Rezoning

3-C-15-RZ

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

RECOMMEND the Knox County Commission approve PR (Planned Residential) zoning at a density up to 3.9 dwelling units per acre


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
RECOMMEND that County Commission APPROVE PR (Planned Residential) zoning at a density of up to 3.9 du/ac.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
West side Dogwood Rd., south of Solway Rd.

Commission District 6
Census Tract 59.07


Size
9.77 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Land Use Designation? LDR & SLPA


Currently on the Property
Vacant land

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
RECOMMEND that County Commission APPROVE PR (Planned Residential) zoning at a density of up to 3.2 du/ac. (Applicant requested 3.9 du/ac.)
PR is an appropriate zone for residential development of this site and is consistent with the sector plan recommendation for the property, which is within the Planned Growth Area on the Growth Policy Plan. The recommended density of up to 3.2 du/ac is consistent with the slope protection recommendations of the Hillside and Ridgetop Protection Plan (HRPP) for residential densities and development. At the requested density of 3.9 du/ac, the proposal exceeds (by 7 units) the maximum 32 units recommended in the HRPP. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has reasonable use of the property at the current density. Except for the CA zoning to the north, all adjacent zoning is Agricultural, which requires a minimum lot size of 1 acre.
Disposition Summary
RECOMMEND the Knox County Commission approve PR (Planned Residential) zoning at a density up to 3.9 dwelling units per acre
Details of Action
RECOMMEND that County Commission APPROVE PR (Planned Residential) zoning at a density of up to 3.9 du/ac.

What's next?

+
After the Planning Commission
This Rezoning case in the County was recommended for approval. The appeal deadline - April 11, 2015 has passed.
Applicant

EJM Properties


Case History