July 10, 2025
Planning Commission meeting
Planning Commission meeting
Public Comments
13 Comments for
Diana
37931
37931
7-Q-25-RZ
Diana (37931), July 1, 2025 at 5:27 AM
Please see the attached opposition to the 32 acre rezoning request. Diana (37931), July 1, 2025 at 5:27 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250701052729.pdf
Jeff
37931
37931
7-A-25-OA
Jeff (37931), July 7, 2025 at 12:32 PM
The landscape section should be removed or limited to large lots above 1 acre or commercial in nature. Vast amounts of time and money is wasted trying to meet arbitrary compliance when its not possible to meet on small lots. Even when you prove that you can not meet the required plantings, the alternative plans get denied and you end up wasting even more time. Trees are being forced to be installed on top of retaining walls, under power lines, over water lines with no flexibility given. These create major liabilities for property owners. Jeff (37931), July 7, 2025 at 12:32 PM
Duane
37931
37931
7-Q-25-RZ
Duane (37931), July 8, 2025 at 5:29 PM
My property is directly affected by this planned development. The gulley that runs from the top of the ridge and through our property is inundated with run off during heavy rains and in the spring. Looking at the elevations of the ridge behind us there is no way any development can account for the additional run off that will be caused by this development and not cause damage to our property.Duane (37931), July 8, 2025 at 5:29 PM
The adverse impact on the ridge and current land owners below are not being considered. We were not contacted by the developer to address any concerns or possible issues. I am in full agreement with the comments made by Diane that this is an attempt to push a development before final rules are put in place.
The ridge forest is habitat for a diverse wild life population that will be destroyed. I believe the original owners placing this into a protected area should be enforced. We have ruined so much of our natural beauty in Knox county and the ridges need to be protected.
Cassie
37931
37931
7-K-25-RZ
Cassie (37931), July 10, 2025 at 5:50 AM
I live on Hazelnut and have watched as this owner has slowly added more large box trucks to the property much like the previous owner it seems they are trying to circumvent the zoning and just do what they want with the property. On top of filling in the food plain which effects those of us that also live on the creek and despite being told to remove the fill dirt they have made zero effort to remove any of it. Like they think if they just wait it out we will forget they are violating FEMA guidelines. I am 100% opposed to this property being rezoned to commercial in any way. I understand that this property faces Oak Ridge hwy but it is still part of our neighborhood and with it also being on Grassy creek what they do on that property effects our property and creek downstream. It has finally settled some but for months after they added the dirt the creek was full of red dirt every-time it rained. They bought the property knowing it was majority floodplain and also probably knowing that the previous owner was denied rezoning as well. I was worried from the purchase of this property when I saw it was bought by a business and not a private owner. I ask that yoy please deny the rezoning request. Cassie (37931), July 10, 2025 at 5:50 AM
Diana
37931
37931
7-Q-25-RZ
Diana (37931), June 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM
I am a lifelong, third generation Knox County resident. I am deeply concerned about this proposed rezoning and redevelopment of the property on Ball Road close to my home. Case 7-Q-25-R2. Please see the attached letter explaining my opposition to additional residential development on Ball Road due to dangerous traffic already in existence. Thanks for your attention to this request. I will ask to speak at the hearing to oppose any new residential development on Ball Road as it is already grossly over traveled and dangerous.Diana (37931), June 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250617081452.pdf
Shane
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Shane (37931), May 6, 2025 at 4:05 PM
The parcel of land, 5240 Schaad Road is adjacent to 7223 Ball Camp Pike. I, respectfully object to the rezoning proposal from agricultural to commercial. There are deep concerns that it could negatively affect the value, the use or enjoyment of the property, and alter the character of the neighborhood community! Thank you.Shane (37931), May 6, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Lester
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Lester (37931), May 6, 2025 at 9:51 PM
We have lived here for 54 years. This is a residential area and would Appreciate you denying this request for commercial. This property should only be residential, only has drainfield for 1 bedroom and no water. Please consider our request. It doesn't have a driveway either.Lester (37931), May 6, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Heather
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Heather (37931), May 7, 2025 at 10:46 AM
I am writing as a resident of [address redacted] to formally express my opposition to the proposed rezoning of the property located at 5240 Schaad Rd from residential to commercial use.Heather (37931), May 7, 2025 at 10:46 AM
Our neighborhood is characterized by its peaceful residential nature, and introducing a commercial entity would disrupt this tranquility. The potential increase in traffic, noise, and activity associated with commercial operations raises significant concerns about safety, especially for children and pedestrians, and the overall quality of life for residents.
Furthermore, such a change could set a precedent for future commercial encroachments, potentially altering the character of our community irreversibly. I urge the Commission to consider the long-term implications of this rezoning and to prioritize the well-being and preferences of existing residents.
Scott
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Scott (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:24 AM
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of the property located at 5240 Schaad Road. This property is entirely surrounded by single-family homes, and there are currently no other commercial or business establishments in the immediate vicinity. Introducing a business into this residential neighborhood would significantly disrupt the character and peacefulness of the area.Scott (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:24 AM
As a homeowner of the adjacent property, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact. The proposed rezoning would likely result in an eyesore and a nuisance to the community. Additionally, the property lacks essential infrastructure for commercial use. It currently has:
No water connection
No access to public sewer services
Soil conditions that support only a single-bathroom sewage system
No existing entrance or driveway
These limitations further underscore the unsuitability of the site for business development.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning application be denied in order to preserve the integrity and residential nature of our neighborhood.
Michelle
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Michelle (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:34 AM
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of the residential land located at 5240 Schaad Rd, Knoxville, TN, from residential to commercial use. Michelle (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:34 AM
First , our neighborhood has always been a peaceful residential area, and rezoning this land for commercial use would disrupt the quiet and close-knit nature of our community. Turning this land into a commercial zone would not only affect the character of the area but could also lead to additional commercial development in the future.
Additionally, traffic in our area has already increased significantly with the construction of the new road. Our neighborhood has sidewalks used daily by families, children, and elderly residents for walking and recreation. With increased traffic, many residents would no longer feel safe using these sidewalks which undermines the walkability of our community.
Lastly, a shift to commercial use could have negative consequences for nearby property values and diminish the residential appeal of our area. Noise, lighting, and increased activity from commercial operations could deter future families from settling in what has always been a peaceful residential zone.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the commission to deny the rezoning request and preserve the residential nature of our neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration.
Chris
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Chris (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:43 AM
I am writing as a concerned neighbor to formally oppose the proposed rezoning of the parcel located at 5240 Schaad Rd from residential/agricultural to commercial use.Chris (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:43 AM
This proposed change is concerning for several reasons:
1. The surrounding area is primarily residential and agricultural, fostering a peaceful and rural environment. A shift to commercial zoning would not only disrupt the character of the neighborhood but also contradict the original intent of land use in this area.
2. Commercial development typically brings a significant increase in vehicle traffic, including delivery trucks and customer vehicles. This rise in traffic would pose safety risks to local residents, particularly children and pedestrians.
3. Rezoning may lead to noise pollution, light pollution, and runoff that could affect local farmland, wildlife, and water supplies.
4. Commercialization could result in decreased property values and negatively affect our quality of life.
I respectfully urge the board to reject this rezoning request and preserve the integrity and intent of our communitys land use plan.
jane
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
jane (37931), May 7, 2025 at 3:00 PM
My Parents bought 27 acres at [address redacted] when I was a very young girl. I have lived here for over 70 Years. My Husband & I now own that home. Our residential driveway is directly beside the proposed rezoning spot. We also own a home at [address redacted] directly across from the proposed rezoning spot. I am totally against rezoning that spot at 5240 Schaad. to anything except residential or agriculture This is a Family Friendly community of Homes residential & agriculture.This is not a good fit at all for that spot. There is already an approved development (which is actively developing) for an EZ Stop that was changed from AG to CM at the corner of Schaad & Johnson Rd which is only approx. 0.3 miles from this proposed rezoning Thank you and please deny this proposal.jane (37931), May 7, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Ronald
37931
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Ronald (37931), May 5, 2025 at 11:27 AM
We are residents of this neighborhood and our property boundaries this lot. We have lived here 50+ years and raised our children and grandchildren here. This lot is surrounded by residential housing and there is not a business within a mile at this time. We are afraid if it is rezoned commercial, it will damage the family atmosphere of the neighborhood and influence lower property values. We are asking you to deny this request and leave it residential for the betterment of the families located here. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.Ronald (37931), May 5, 2025 at 11:27 AM