November 12, 2026
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

3 Comments for
X ZIP Code
Case Number
Name
Comment
Attachment
On Behalf Of
Date
10-SC-26-F
Amy
37934
10-SC-26-F
Amy (37934), October 30, 2026 at 1:08 PM
In the Rezoning Report dated 4/9/2026, FILE #: 4-T-26-RZ the following statement appears:
1. The property does not currently have sewer, but it is available for connection in the adjacent townhome subdivision.
Concord Villas HOA wants to reiterate that sewer connections are NOT available in Concord Villas. Also, there are slopes between 20 and 45 degrees between the parcel in question and Concord Villas. First Utility District already approached Concord Villas about connecting another adjacent property in 2025 and it was not permitted.
We just want to avoid any confusion in the sewer connection process.
Thank you
October 30, 2026
at 1:08 PM
11-N-26-RZ
Tony
37934
11-N-26-RZ
Tony (37934), November 4, 2026 at 10:04 AM
Dear Sir or Madam, although I do not live in the immediate area, I frequently visit to see family and friends, including five grandchildren who reside nearby. The current zoning, Rural Conservation, was designated to preserve the rural character of the area, and the existing infrastructure reflects that low-density designation. With over 50% of the land remaining undeveloped in Knox. county, and opportunities to repurpose underutilized areas where infrastructure can support additional housing, it does not make sense to add 100 more homes to an already overcapacity area. I am not opposed to affordable housing but strongly believe it should be implemented responsibly. A developer's desire to maximize property value or Knox County's interest in increasing tax revenue should not be sufficient reasons to approve this request. We are against this proposal.
Tony G
November 4, 2026
at 10:04 AM
11-N-26-RZ
Peggy
37934
11-N-26-RZ
Peggy (37934), November 4, 2026 at 11:18 AM
**Dear Sir or Madam,**
Although I do not reside in the immediate area, I have a strong personal connection to this community through family and friends, including my five grandchildren who live nearby. I visit the area often and care deeply about preserving the character and quality of life of this community.
The Rural Conservation zoning designation exists for a reason: to protect the area's rural atmosphere and maintain development at a level that its existing infrastructure can reasonably support. Adding another 100 homes to an area that is already experiencing capacity concerns raises serious questions about the impact on roads, traffic, public services, and the overall quality of life for those who live there.
I understand the importance of affordable housing and recognize the need for responsible growth. However, development decisions should take into consideration the long-term needs of the community, not simply the potential financial benefits to a developer or increased tax revenue for Knox County. There are other areas that may be better suited for additional housing, particularly where infrastructure is already in place to accommodate growth.
I respectfully urge you to consider the lasting impact this decision could have on the surrounding community and to deny this zoning request.
**I strongly oppose this proposal.**
Sincerely,
Mrs. Peggy S. G.
November 4, 2026
at 11:18 AM