June 12, 2025
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

48 Comments for
Case Number
Name
Comment
Attachment
On Behalf Of
Date
12-SF-23-C
Matthew
37932
12-SF-23-C
Matthew (37932), December 6, 2023 at 12:17 PM
PLEASE see the attached letter regarding this illegal development. There is ZERO path forward due to this developers complete disregard of State Law and local Rules & Regulations. Quit wasting taxpayer money defending a developer over Knox County Taxpayer's safety and concerns. This development was determined illegal by Knox County Chancery Court and this staff/commission has no authority to approve as-is. We request you to DENY this plan to avoid a fifth or more lawsuit - The first lawsuit clarifies the illegalities of this plan and the wrongdoings of the previous commission. The next three lawsuits involve the current staff and commission as you have aided this developer and Amy Brooks to, yet again, illegally approve this development against our advisement.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20231206121707.pdf
December 6, 2023
at 12:17 PM
12-G-23-DP
Matthew
37932
12-G-23-DP
Matthew (37932), December 6, 2023 at 12:18 PM
PLEASE see the attached letter regarding this illegal development. There is ZERO path forward due to this developers complete disregard of State Law and local Rules & Regulations. Quit wasting taxpayer money defending a developer over Knox County Taxpayer's safety and concerns. This development was determined illegal by Knox County Chancery Court and this staff/commission has no authority to approve as-is. We request you to DENY this plan to avoid a fifth or more lawsuit - The first lawsuit clarifies the illegalities of this plan and the wrongdoings of the previous commission. The next three lawsuits involve the current staff and commission as you have aided this developer and Amy Brooks to, yet again, illegally approve this development against our advisement.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20231206121818.pdf
December 6, 2023
at 12:18 PM
12-SF-23-C
Mike
37932
12-SF-23-C
Mike (37932), December 12, 2023 at 6:59 PM
I place my trust in you to use the existing laws as the governing framework for making any decisions related to this and all development in Hardin Valley. The developers are fully aware of these laws and if they are allowed to circumvent them by exceptions just because of their relationships, with a wink and a nod that they can go ahead and build with the knowledge that their position will be supported by the planning commission; it sets a terrible precedent.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20231212185946.pdf
December 12, 2023
at 6:59 PM
12-SF-23-C
Michael
37932
12-SF-23-C
Michael (37932), December 12, 2023 at 9:52 PM
Please see the attached .pdf letter/document. A summary is below. I sadly have to write again about the same topic and agenda item - this time in a new form - as I have previously - The Lantern Park subdivision. This project, owned and developed by Scott Smith, continues to be illegally pushed upon you as Commissioners. The idea is that if they keep on asking, keep on attempting to circumvent - and in fact blatantly not follow - local rules and ordinances as well as the law of the State of Tennessee, they could wear down anyone who stands in their way. Their mantra is essentially "might makes right. Please know that we will continue to vigorously oppose what we know to be right, what the judge has already ruled to be illegal, as well as what you - if you are being honest - know to be wrong. We respectfully ask that you DENY this plan before you, in accordance with, among other things, staff recommendation. It is not your job to bail out developers who seek "end arounds" established law and common sense
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20231212215250.pdf
December 12, 2023
at 9:52 PM
12-SF-23-C
Michele
37932
12-SF-23-C
Michele (37932), December 13, 2023 at 11:07 PM
It is ridiculous that the developers are greedy and after 4 lawsuits still trying to get away with doing what they want. We just want to maintain our road/entrance the way it is. There is no need to disturb that.
December 13, 2023
at 11:07 PM
12-SF-23-C
Heather
37932
12-SF-23-C
Heather (37932), January 28, 2024 at 3:19 PM
We vehemently oppose this entire subdivision and plan, as the entirety of it is illegal, especially the minimum distance between Mission Hill and the entrance to Lantern Park, as this variance is illegal and was granted illegally. It’s incredibly disappointing that the planning commission continues to approve development after development without consideration for the impact on the community surrounding this and all the developments. Greater infrastructure needs to be implemented. This development is a blatant disregard for proper planning processes and highlights how corrupt this entire commission and planning process truly is.
January 28, 2024
at 3:19 PM
12-G-23-DP
Heather
37932
12-G-23-DP
Heather (37932), January 28, 2024 at 3:20 PM
We vehemently oppose this entire subdivision and plan, as the entirety of it is illegal, especially the minimum distance between Mission Hill and the entrance to Lantern Park, as this variance is illegal and was granted illegally. It’s incredibly disappointing that the planning commission continues to approve development after development without consideration for the impact on the community surrounding this and all the developments. Greater infrastructure needs to be implemented. This development is a blatant disregard for proper planning processes and highlights how corrupt this entire commission and planning process truly is.
January 28, 2024
at 3:20 PM
12-SF-23-C
Kim
37932
12-SF-23-C
Kim (37932), January 28, 2024 at 3:30 PM
This development was determined illegal by Knox County Chancery Court and this staff/commission has no authority to approve as-is. We request you to DENY this plan to avoid a fifth or more lawsuit - The first lawsuit clarifies the illegalities of this plan and the wrongdoings of the previous commission.
January 28, 2024
at 3:30 PM
12-G-23-DP
Fred
37932
12-G-23-DP
Fred (37932), January 28, 2024 at 4:22 PM
I oppose this entire subdivision and plan, as the entirety of it is illegal, especially the minimum distance between Mission Hill and the entrance to Lantern Park, as this variance is illegal and was granted illegally. Please reject this plan. Please work to preserve and promote smart growth in the county.
January 28, 2024
at 4:22 PM
12-SF-23-C
Jaime
37932
12-SF-23-C
Jaime (37932), January 30, 2024 at 11:04 AM
The proposed development continues to include request for variances that they have created in their proposal. You cannot create your own hardship. This builder was on the planning commission at the time the original proposal was considered. Instead of pushing the rules he should have been an example to the building expectations Knox county currently has. Through litigation, our homeowners association has proven this to be illegal yet the only change has been a one lot reduction that does not address the variance issues. They also continue to build 5 homes on an illegal road location. We ask that you deny this concept plan.
January 30, 2024
at 11:04 AM
12-SF-23-C
Caroline
37932
12-SF-23-C
Caroline (37932), January 30, 2024 at 12:58 PM
I'm a homeowner in Massey Creek for 7 years, and been and oppose the subdivision and plan. This development was determined by Knox County Chancery Court as illegally approved by the previous commission and ordered to be heard through Planning once again if they want to proceed. This developer has not addressed the illegal issues. For example, the minimum distance between Mission Hill and the entrance to Lantern Park is illegal and was granted illegally. Please reject this plan and influence the developer to adhere to the laws.
January 30, 2024
at 12:58 PM
12-SF-23-C
Vonna
37932
12-SF-23-C
Vonna (37932), January 30, 2024 at 3:04 PM
I am a homeowner in the Massey Creek subdivision for over 5 years and I once again am writing to oppose the entire subdivision and plan. The plan developed is illegal due to the minimum distance between Mission Hill and the entrance to Lantern Park. This plan was granted illegal and therefore should be deemed illegal moving forward. Shame on the developer for being money hungry and putting innocent lives at risk.
January 30, 2024
at 3:04 PM
12-SF-23-C
Tom
37932
12-SF-23-C
Tom (37932), January 30, 2024 at 4:07 PM
If what is proceeding has been deemed illegal with a wink and a nod to a builder who clearly appears to have some sort of inside track with friends, where and when does the line get drawn on illegalities? Why do we have any laws? Or do we not follow laws only when someone of importance or connection is inconvenienced? In this case the judge clearly has deemed what is going on as illegal. Yet the ruling is ignored. There is no democratic process here being upheld by our elected officials. Why should any of us follow any laws in Knox County?
January 30, 2024
at 4:07 PM
12-SF-23-C
Mackenzie
37932
12-SF-23-C
Mackenzie (37932), January 30, 2024 at 4:32 PM
I oppose this plan, especially the minimum distance between Mission Hill and the entrance to Lantern Park. This was granted illegally and is an illegal variance. The planning for Hardin Valley needs to be smart and follow the rules and regulations set forth by the planning commission. I urge you to push for this property and plan to be halted and stopped. Let's preserve the safety and well being of the people of this county. Thank you for your consideration.
January 30, 2024
at 4:32 PM
12-SF-23-C
Chris
37932
12-SF-23-C
Chris (37932), January 30, 2024 at 6:17 PM
It’s mind blowing that this issue is constantly resurfacing when the build is in clear violation and they keep pursuing their agenda with Knox County. Can we please stop the madness and wasting tax payers money.
January 30, 2024
at 6:17 PM
12-SF-23-C
Tanya
37932
12-SF-23-C
Tanya (37932), January 30, 2024 at 8:49 PM
I’m a homeowner in Massey Creek subdivision, and I ask that you deny this plan. Through litigation with our HOA, this development plan was deemed illegal by Knox County Chancery Court, as a result, this plan should be denied. The developer should be required to adhere to the law.
January 30, 2024
at 8:49 PM
12-G-23-DP
Brandon
37932
12-G-23-DP
Brandon (37932), January 31, 2024 at 2:01 PM
I'm a homeowner in Massey Creek for 3 years and have been and still oppose the subdivision and plan. This development was determined by Knox County Chancery Court as illegally approved by the previous commission and ordered to be heard through Planning once again if they want to proceed. This developer has not addressed the illegal issues. The Massey Creek HOA has sued and won against this developer for the illegal variances granted. For example, the minimum distance between Mission Hill and the entrance to Lantern Park is illegal and was granted illegally. Please reject this plan and influence the developer to adhere to the laws.
January 31, 2024
at 2:01 PM
4-U-25-RZ
Christopher
37914
4-U-25-RZ
Christopher (37914), April 9, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Town Hall East and the local residents met with the developer regarding this property. It was a productive meeting, but at this time, we are requesting that the R-3 designation be declined. We will work with the developer to come up with a more appropriate use of the property that addresses traffic issues and the privacy of the neighboring residents.
April 9, 2025
at 3:38 PM
6-A-25-UR
Debra & Sterling
37932
6-A-25-UR
Debra & Sterling (37932), April 30, 2025 at 10:23 PM
We reside in the Forest Mills Subdivision and this planned kennel became known to us by our HOA. We are 100% against the planning for this. The constant barking dogs are already a nuisance. There are numerous people who work from home and this will be a significant issue for those who do as well as our quiet time in the evenings and on the weekends.
This will also have a significant impact on the value of our homes and for the homes around us. If any of us would go to sell, this would certainly devalue the price of the homes and property. Please vote no on this.
April 30, 2025
at 10:23 PM
6-A-25-UR
Sterling
37932
6-A-25-UR
Sterling (37932), April 30, 2025 at 10:26 PM
There are already issues with barking dogs for people who work from home. This would devalue our property, ruin the charm and appeal of our community. Concerned about increased traffic as well.
April 30, 2025
at 10:26 PM
6-A-25-UR
Kristen
37932
6-A-25-UR
Kristen (37932), May 1, 2025 at 12:08 AM
See attachment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250501000802.pdf
May 1, 2025
at 12:08 AM
6-A-25-UR
Brianna
37932
6-A-25-UR
Brianna (37932), May 3, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Forest Mill is a quiet neighborhood. Allowing a dog kennel to operate so closely is a nuisance to its residents and will negatively impact property values. If the dog kennel is to be allowed, can the applicant be required to move it further away from the neighborhood homes? The applicant has 26 acres, why is it necessary to place the kennel so close to a neighborhood that was established first? Please consider how you would feel about a dog kennel next to your home.
May 3, 2025
at 7:54 PM
5-I-25-RZ
Ronald
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Ronald (37931), May 5, 2025 at 11:27 AM
We are residents of this neighborhood and our property boundaries this lot. We have lived here 50+ years and raised our children and grandchildren here. This lot is surrounded by residential housing and there is not a business within a mile at this time. We are afraid if it is rezoned commercial, it will damage the family atmosphere of the neighborhood and influence lower property values. We are asking you to deny this request and leave it residential for the betterment of the families located here. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
May 5, 2025
at 11:27 AM
6-A-25-UR
Lisa
37932
6-A-25-UR
Lisa (37932), May 5, 2025 at 1:52 PM
I have lived in the Forest Mill subdivision for 20 years. We chose this location due to the serene and quiet attributes while having the benefit of a subdivision. Since this kennel has come to exist, I can no longer take my dogs out in my backyard because they react negatively to the constant barking from this kennel. We can also no longer enjoy a quiet and relaxed atmosphere in our backyard. Note that we are well down the hill from our neighbors that sit on the hill. They did share a video of them sitting in their backyard and I was appalled that they were having to deal with this. I urge to you vote no for this and preserve the quality of life that we, as residents, chose in the selection of our homes. I urge you to make a statement that it is not ok for someone to create what they want, when they want, without having it analyzed nor approved. I'm sure with any analysis or perhaps a brief visit to our neighborhood, you would definitely not approve this request which has created havoc in our neighborhood.
May 5, 2025
at 1:52 PM
4-A-25-SP
Benjamin
37902
4-A-25-SP
Benjamin (37902), May 5, 2025 at 3:52 PM
See attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250505155253.pdf
May 5, 2025
at 3:52 PM
5-I-25-RZ
Shane
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Shane (37931), May 6, 2025 at 4:05 PM
The parcel of land, 5240 Schaad Road is adjacent to 7223 Ball Camp Pike. I, respectfully object to the rezoning proposal from agricultural to commercial. There are deep concerns that it could negatively affect the value, the use or enjoyment of the property, and alter the character of the neighborhood community! Thank you.
May 6, 2025
at 4:05 PM
5-I-25-RZ
Lester
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Lester (37931), May 6, 2025 at 9:51 PM
We have lived here for 54 years. This is a residential area and would Appreciate you denying this request for commercial. This property should only be residential, only has drainfield for 1 bedroom and no water. Please consider our request. It doesn't have a driveway either.
May 6, 2025
at 9:51 PM
5-N-25-RZ
Louise
37934
5-N-25-RZ
Louise (37934), May 7, 2025 at 8:42 AM
The request to amend the future land use map from Rural Conservation to Suburban Residential should be denied. This area was thoughtfully considered and designated Rural Conservation intentionally.
As stated in the staff report, a significant portion of the property is designated hillside protection, the property is accessed via a substandard road which cannot appropriately support higher density development and the designation of this property as Rural Conservation is in keeping with the surrounding properties which access the same substandard network of roads. There was no error in designating this property Rural Conservation.
Further, this request does not meet one, let alone two, of the criteria to amend the Comprehensive Plan, which is the standard the Knox County Commission imposed when they adopted the Comprehensive Plan.
With no errors in the designation of this property, no changing conditions along the Snyder Road corridor and the failure to meet at least two criteria to amend the future land use map, the request to rezone the property to Planned Residential up to 12 units/acre should be denied.
May 7, 2025
at 8:42 AM
5-I-25-RZ
Heather
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Heather (37931), May 7, 2025 at 10:46 AM
I am writing as a resident of [address redacted] to formally express my opposition to the proposed rezoning of the property located at 5240 Schaad Rd from residential to commercial use.
Our neighborhood is characterized by its peaceful residential nature, and introducing a commercial entity would disrupt this tranquility. The potential increase in traffic, noise, and activity associated with commercial operations raises significant concerns about safety, especially for children and pedestrians, and the overall quality of life for residents.
Furthermore, such a change could set a precedent for future commercial encroachments, potentially altering the character of our community irreversibly. I urge the Commission to consider the long-term implications of this rezoning and to prioritize the well-being and preferences of existing residents.
May 7, 2025
at 10:46 AM
5-I-25-RZ
Scott
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Scott (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:24 AM
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of the property located at 5240 Schaad Road. This property is entirely surrounded by single-family homes, and there are currently no other commercial or business establishments in the immediate vicinity. Introducing a business into this residential neighborhood would significantly disrupt the character and peacefulness of the area.
As a homeowner of the adjacent property, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact. The proposed rezoning would likely result in an eyesore and a nuisance to the community. Additionally, the property lacks essential infrastructure for commercial use. It currently has:
No water connection
No access to public sewer services
Soil conditions that support only a single-bathroom sewage system
No existing entrance or driveway
These limitations further underscore the unsuitability of the site for business development.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning application be denied in order to preserve the integrity and residential nature of our neighborhood.
May 7, 2025
at 11:24 AM
5-I-25-RZ
Michelle
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Michelle (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:34 AM
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of the residential land located at 5240 Schaad Rd, Knoxville, TN, from residential to commercial use.
First , our neighborhood has always been a peaceful residential area, and rezoning this land for commercial use would disrupt the quiet and close-knit nature of our community. Turning this land into a commercial zone would not only affect the character of the area but could also lead to additional commercial development in the future.
Additionally, traffic in our area has already increased significantly with the construction of the new road. Our neighborhood has sidewalks used daily by families, children, and elderly residents for walking and recreation. With increased traffic, many residents would no longer feel safe using these sidewalks which undermines the walkability of our community.
Lastly, a shift to commercial use could have negative consequences for nearby property values and diminish the residential appeal of our area. Noise, lighting, and increased activity from commercial operations could deter future families from settling in what has always been a peaceful residential zone.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the commission to deny the rezoning request and preserve the residential nature of our neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration.
May 7, 2025
at 11:34 AM
5-I-25-RZ
Chris
37931
5-I-25-RZ
Chris (37931), May 7, 2025 at 11:43 AM
I am writing as a concerned neighbor to formally oppose the proposed rezoning of the parcel located at 5240 Schaad Rd from residential/agricultural to commercial use.
This proposed change is concerning for several reasons:
1. The surrounding area is primarily residential and agricultural, fostering a peaceful and rural environment. A shift to commercial zoning would not only disrupt the character of the neighborhood but also contradict the original intent of land use in this area.
2. Commercial development typically brings a significant increase in vehicle traffic, including delivery trucks and customer vehicles. This rise in traffic would pose safety risks to local residents, particularly children and pedestrians.
3. Rezoning may lead to noise pollution, light pollution, and runoff that could affect local farmland, wildlife, and water supplies.
4. Commercialization could result in decreased property values and negatively affect our quality of life.
I respectfully urge the board to reject this rezoning request and preserve the integrity and intent of our communitys land use plan.
May 7, 2025
at 11:43 AM
6-A-25-UR
Amy
37932
6-A-25-UR
Amy (37932), May 7, 2025 at 2:01 PM
As you review the proposal submitted by this business owner, I implore you to consider the surrounding properties, because this property owner does not appear to care. The barking from this kennel has ruined what used to be the solitude of my back yard. The barking is so bad at times that it is channeled down my chimney and into my living room via my fireplace, so even if I have all my doors and windows closed I cant escape the noise. I have tried calling the kennel, sending a letter, and acting like a crazy person by banging on a pot to try to communicate my frustration with the property owner. I was told that it is was a farm, dogs would bark, they were exempt from noise ordinances because they are a business, I should be happy it wasnt a subdivision, and I should feel protected by the dogs. I never thought I would see the day when I wanted a subdivision instead of a farm bordering my property. The nearest parts of the kennel and its dog pens are approximately 200 feet from my back door. Sound is projected straight to the backside of my home. I have recorded many examples of how bad the barking can be. I welcome people to come to my home and see it first-hand. Please consider what is being proposed by this business in relation to the homes surrounding this business.
May 7, 2025
at 2:01 PM
5-I-25-RZ
jane
37931
5-I-25-RZ
jane (37931), May 7, 2025 at 3:00 PM
My Parents bought 27 acres at [address redacted] when I was a very young girl. I have lived here for over 70 Years. My Husband & I now own that home. Our residential driveway is directly beside the proposed rezoning spot. We also own a home at [address redacted] directly across from the proposed rezoning spot. I am totally against rezoning that spot at 5240 Schaad. to anything except residential or agriculture This is a Family Friendly community of Homes residential & agriculture.This is not a good fit at all for that spot. There is already an approved development (which is actively developing) for an EZ Stop that was changed from AG to CM at the corner of Schaad & Johnson Rd which is only approx. 0.3 miles from this proposed rezoning Thank you and please deny this proposal.
May 7, 2025
at 3:00 PM
5-I-25-RZ
Zachary
37771
5-I-25-RZ
Zachary (37771), May 7, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Please see attachment. Character and attachments limit.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250507150155.pdf
May 7, 2025
at 3:01 PM
5-B-25-PA
Kathleen
37924
5-B-25-PA
Kathleen (37924), May 7, 2025 at 3:43 PM
I do not believe the application for rezoning should be denied. The location is not designed for the use they have planned. It is also a very bad intersection already. Now you will have traffic coming off the 25/70 ramp to cross over at the last minute with trailer causing more wrecks. This will mean more people will lose their lives at this intersection. I am not happy that people from west Knoxville want to make a junk area in our front yard when they would not in their area. East Knoxville was once a place with small businesses we could be proud to support. Now everyone wants to put businesses in our area that they do not want in other areas. Please do not allow this to happen.
May 7, 2025
at 3:43 PM
6-A-25-UR
Jason
37932
6-A-25-UR
Jason (37932), May 8, 2025 at 6:00 PM
The proposed land use change is a significant deviation from prior use. The current sitting of the kennel is causing a significant noise problem that impacts the existing properties in the area. Relocation of the kennel informed by an appropriate noise impact study should be required by the commission prior to approval by the commission.
May 8, 2025
at 6:00 PM
6-A-25-UR
Kristi
37932
6-A-25-UR
Kristi (37932), May 9, 2025 at 10:40 AM
Hello, I live in the Forest Mill subdivision that is next to this property. The kennel has brought noise pollution to our once quiet area. I ask that if this change is approved, Mr. Cottle will be a good neighbor and place a barrier to quieten the barking associated with his business.
Sincerely,
Kristi P.
May 9, 2025
at 10:40 AM
6-A-25-UR
Robert
37932
6-A-25-UR
Robert (37932), May 14, 2025 at 8:39 AM
The barking has got to stop! We can't enjoy our back porch and cookout area anymore! My wife wears hearing aids and the additional amplification is driving her insane while outside. Please consider relocation or a enclosed facility to stop the excessive barking and howling. We have concerns about our property value if this continues.
May 14, 2025
at 8:39 AM
6-A-25-UR
Kim
37932
6-A-25-UR
Kim (37932), May 14, 2025 at 8:55 AM
I wear hearing aids and the amplified barking and howling has taken a toll on my outside enjoyment. I am a gun advocate, but have an issue with the number of rounds being shot on the same property close to the dog kennel as well. The poor dogs scatter when the shots start, and they bark and howl excessively after they stop. This madness has to stop! Please consider a nuisance/noise impact study. Our property values are declining due to this boarding facility.
May 14, 2025
at 8:55 AM
6-A-25-UR
Patricia
37932
6-A-25-UR
Patricia (37932), May 14, 2025 at 9:51 AM
I have two issues with the dog kennel on the property behind us.
First, the kennel is located so close to our subdivision that it prevents me from enjoying our back yard due to their relentless barking. This problem is unrelenting and sounds to me that the dogs are constantly upset (see below). I am 75 years old and use hearing aids, but this is a problem without them as well.
Second, I am an animal lover and am concerned about why the dogs bark all the time without stopping, dawn to dusk. The sounds of the gun range that is used on the property are loud and scare me, so it makes sense that it would terrify the dogs as well. It seems to me that a shooting range and a dog kennel business near each other are incompatible with the welfare of those dogs in care.
I urge the planning commission to consider resolving these issues and their impact on a suburban neighborhood. One example of such mitigation would be to move the kennel to another location on the property and construct a sound mitigating structure of some kind that a) reduces the noise of the dogs barking on the kennel's subdivision neighbors and b) protects the dogs hearing from the gun range use.
May 14, 2025
at 9:51 AM
6-E-25-RZ
Canaan
37912
6-E-25-RZ
Canaan (37912), May 14, 2025 at 9:30 PM
I am a long time resident of Keck Road. This road has been continuously developed over the last several years with multiple single family homes. While these are nice, they contribute largely to the increase in traffic on our narrow street. There are children that live on this street, including my own, that more traffic will only hinder their outside play. The road also needs repair from the city due to the increase in traffic and ongoing water issues that cause the asphalt to break. Please see multiple reports to Knoxville's 311. Secondly, the property in question inhabits multiple wildlife species that thrive in the underdeveloped land. Over the years, the various wildlife have been driven out of their habitats by the development that continues to occur on Keck. They are driven towards Callahan Drive which is very dangerous for everyone including the animals. I ask that you heavily consider not re-zoning this for multiple dwellings rather keep it zoned AG for someone who will build 1-2 homes with space and care for our street and the multiple species that were here first.
May 14, 2025
at 9:30 PM
6-A-25-UR
Jeremiah
37932
6-A-25-UR
Jeremiah (37932), May 15, 2025 at 3:47 PM
My name is Jeremiah Cottle - I am the owner of the property in question. I have taken the time to read and address each of the above complaints, slanders and outright lies in the attached…. All video documentation is uploaded on my personal IG for public access. I also encourage everyone that if there is any issue with noise to contact me immediately and we will address it. I am for the approval of the permit
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250515154743.pdf
May 15, 2025
at 3:47 PM
6-A-25-UR
Vaughn
37932
6-A-25-UR
Vaughn (37932), May 16, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Id like to see more people support a veteran owned business. There is a huge need in our community for boarding dogs and having a trusted place to fulfill this need.
I do not like how some neighbors and people are probing the dogs & doing things to get a rise or reaction out of them. It makes it hard to know who the real problem is; people or animals? I say its people. These are not wild animals. They are animals who are loved and have a home, they are being watched and cared for.
We need to support this business, the owner is the nicest and most accommodating, he takes time to listen, acknowledge and has a solution to any concern.
May 16, 2025
at 11:22 AM
6-A-25-UR
Trey
77616
6-A-25-UR
Trey (77616), May 16, 2025 at 12:50 PM
See attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250516125035.pdf
May 16, 2025
at 12:50 PM
6-A-25-UR
Joseph
37763
6-A-25-UR
Joseph (37763), May 16, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Jeremiah has a unique farm in Hardin Valley that i reminiscent of what Hardin Valley used to be. He not only has a working agricultural farm on land zoned for such things he also provides a needed resource for the community. A community in which almost everyone owns a dog.
May 16, 2025
at 4:49 PM
6-A-25-UR
Christine
37932
6-A-25-UR
Christine (37932), May 19, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Jeremiah is dedicated to animal welfare and his proactive approach to addressing community concerns. His commitment to providing for his and others€animals is commendable. The kennel provides valuable services to the community which is essential for pet owners seeking quality care for their dogs.
Furthermore, the site offers ample space for kennel operations, reducing the risk of overcrowding for the neighborhood and for the dogs. The facility's design and management mitigates concerns related to noise and ensures that the business operates in harmony with the surrounding residential area. However, there are local residents that are harassing Jeremiah and the dogs by banging pots and pans in order to induce barking.
While it's important to address the concerns raised by some residents, it's equally vital to remember that they have been caused by harassing neighbors banging pans and recognize the potential benefits this kennel could bring to the community. The kennel has the opportunity to become a valued asset to the area.
May 19, 2025
at 3:21 PM
6-C-25-DP
Jeremiah
37932
6-C-25-DP
Jeremiah (37932), May 19, 2025 at 4:49 PM
I am the owner of the ranch in the west end of this proposed development. I have taken the time to carefully review the proposed plans. The plans, as proposed, would devastate the wildlife and my farm. My proposal only affects approximately 20 homes of the hundreds proposed. It is reasonable and in the spirit of Tennessee law that protects farmers from encroachment. I do not oppose the development of the land, however, I do request that the developer respect my rights protected by this great state and help come to a conclusion that provides room for progress but allows me to stay here.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250519164930.pdf
May 19, 2025
at 4:49 PM