Public Comments

February 23, 2026
at 8:31 PM

Deborah
37924

3-K-26-DP
Deborah (37924), February 23, 2026 at 8:31 PM

My objection is the same as for the last lot --we lost our Greenway which was supposed to serve as our common area-- the homeowners were ignored and the constructio approved anyway. So this lot is even smaller than the one you approved...how can you approve such a small lot for building another equivalent house?

February 23, 2026
at 11:02 PM

Justin
37924

3-K-26-DP
Justin (37924), February 23, 2026 at 11:02 PM

Our neighborhood is called "the park at bablay." If this is rezoned, there will be no park.

February 24, 2026
at 8:57 AM

Carol
37924

3-K-26-DP
Carol (37924), February 24, 2026 at 8:57 AM

As a homeowner in The Park at Babelay Road, I formally object to Case 3-K-26-DP regarding the replat of Lot 73. This parcel, originally designated as common area and previously denied building approval, now seeks to incorporate 2007 right-of-way to become buildable. I request a technical review to ensure compliance with all standards.

I do object to making either paved roadway narrower just so the small corner can be built upon. There has been no meeting or consultation with the homeowners regarding this request.

Amy
37924

3-K-26-DP
Amy (37924), March 1, 2026 at 4:10 PM

Please see attachment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260301161041.pdf

March 1, 2026
at 4:10 PM

March 12, 2026
at 3:09 PM

Bettina
37924

3-K-26-DP
Bettina (37924), March 2, 2026 at 4:42 PM

I object to the redone/building of a home on this lot. The lot is not large enough for the neighborhoods standard lot size. The developer is, therefore, looking to incorporate the right of way as part of the lot so that the square foot minimum is met. I find this highly unprofessional and inappropriate.

March 2, 2026
at 4:42 PM

4-G-26-RZ

Craig
37931

4-G-26-RZ
Craig (37931), March 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM

This location cannot house a development with the current road infrastructure. It's a 2 lane tight road. And the only road access out of developement would be on a blind curve.

March 13, 2026
at 7:44 PM

Jenn
37917

4-O-26-RZ
Jenn (37917), March 13, 2026 at 7:44 PM

This is just a move to avoid following the law and doing right with the atmosphere. The amount of pollution not to mention the smell in our neighborhood is ridiculous. Hopefully the govt will see this smoke screen and avoid this situation.

March 13, 2026
at 7:49 PM

Michelle
37917

4-O-26-RZ
Michelle (37917), March 13, 2026 at 7:49 PM

This particular business has no place in a mainly residential area. They need to relocate if they want to continue this type of business, somewhere so that their toxic putrid smell doesn't invade neighborhoods.

March 14, 2026
at 9:23 AM

Paul
37917

4-O-26-RZ
Paul (37917), March 14, 2026 at 9:23 AM

Do not allow this change in zoning. This is right next to a large, historic, heavily populated neighborhood. In no way is this a heavy industrial area!

March 15, 2026
at 10:45 AM

Lisa
37917

4-O-26-RZ
Lisa (37917), March 15, 2026 at 10:45 AM

I am writing to oppose the request to rezone the grease processing facility near the Parkridge neighborhood to I-H (Heavy Industrial). Parkridge alone contains over 900 homes within a small area, and nearby neighborhoods are also affected. This is not a case of a few homes bordering an industrial zone, but a dense residential community experiencing ongoing impacts.

The facility has already been cited for operating out of compliance, particularly due to strong odors from grease processing that travel throughout the neighborhood. Residents frequently experience these odors early in the morning when families are starting their day.
A concerning pattern has also developed in which the facility appears to operate its most odor-producing activities late at night and early in the morning, then cease operations before city staff can observe violations. This makes enforcement difficult while the neighborhood continues to bear the impacts.

Rezoning to heavy industrial after documented violations would set a troubling precedent and introduce an incompatible land use into a dense residential area. Grease processing belongs in appropriately zoned industrial districts.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Commission to deny this rezoning request.

4-K-26-RZ

Bradley
37920

4-K-26-RZ
Bradley (37920), March 15, 2026 at 2:30 PM

The signage for this case has been placed at the end of a dead end road completely out of view of the community. I have made attempts to contact the owner of the property to discipline plans with no response. From what I understand the large church on this road was also unaware of this being rezoning to light industry. I am requesting on behalf of our community that this case be postponed until the church and the public are correctly notified of this request. I have notified commissioners Kim Frazier and Andy Fox for help regarding this poor sign placement.

March 15, 2026
at 2:30 PM

4-K-26-RZ

Bradley
37920

4-K-26-RZ
Bradley (37920), March 15, 2026 at 2:45 PM

The sign for this case has been placed at a spot hidden from public view and does not even stand on the correct property. Attempts have been made to contact the owner to discuss plans with no response. This property sits adjacent to the property now owned by Knox county that can only be used as a park. Rezoning this area would require a large buffer and sound blocking construction in order to maintain the parks character and usefulness.

The church on this road is also unaware of any rezoning attempt. The church has a large playground just a few feet from the only road allowing access to this property which to my understanding is used daily. Large heavy trucks with the inability to stop quickly will cause the park and church pedestrians to be in constant danger. This property also sets on the road that is claimed to be used for the relocation of Bower Field away from Chapman Highway.

March 15, 2026
at 2:45 PM

March 16, 2026
at 2:19 AM

Kayahan
37932

4-D-26-DP
Kayahan (37932), March 16, 2026 at 2:19 AM

Please see attached document.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260316021945.pdf

4-SB-26-C

Kayahan
37932

4-SB-26-C
Kayahan (37932), March 16, 2026 at 2:20 AM

Please see the attached document.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260316022038.pdf

March 16, 2026
at 2:20 AM

March 16, 2026
at 11:07 AM

Gary
37932

4-D-26-DP
Gary (37932), March 16, 2026 at 11:07 AM

This is absolutely absurd. We've been told by numerous agents when purchasing this lot and house that no house would ever be placed behind us since it was the woods and creek. There's already so many issues in the neighborhood that have yet to get resolved and now instead of fixing the issues you want to build more? This is the most ridiculous thing we've heard and will not be happy if this plan moves forward.

March 18, 2026
at 2:19 PM

Dorida
37932

4-D-26-DP
Dorida (37932), March 18, 2026 at 2:19 PM

To commissioners,: when are you going to stop allowing developers to do whatever they want. This land, close to the creek, should be left as a green belt also for wildlife there. We live in Hayden Farms on the edge of this land development. Years of dirt dust, and vibration could cause cracks in nearby foundations and is over development of houses. Smithbilt builds house plans with loud hvac condensers placed adjacent to main living room area that creates noise stress through wall. Have to turn off thermostat to avoid loud condensers. Not a fan of this company plan.

March 18, 2026
at 4:57 PM

Kelli
37917

4-O-26-RZ
Kelli (37917), March 18, 2026 at 4:57 PM

I am writing in opposition to the rezoning of this property so that this business can continue to pollute a residential neighborhood. This type of business does not belong at this location at all. They should move to an established I-H zoned location. The horrible smell has been an ongoing problem for years.

March 18, 2026
at 6:35 PM

Piper
37932

4-D-26-DP
Piper (37932), March 18, 2026 at 6:35 PM

I'm a resident of Hayden Farms and strongly oppose this expansion. We moved here believing the neighborhood was complete, so this new construction is unexpected and disruptive. It will increase traffic on our roads, create safety issues, and bring years of noise, dust, and construction into our daily lives. The plan also lacks basic infrastructure like sidewalks and safe connections, and current residents should not be left dealing with the damage or costs from this project.

March 19, 2026
at 12:28 PM

MariEllen
37932

4-D-26-DP
MariEllen (37932), March 19, 2026 at 12:28 PM

I echo concerns about the proposed expansion and ask that it be carefully reconsidered with stronger protections in place. Residents were originally told this community was complete and would not be expanded, so this proposal comes as an unexpected and significant change. There are serious concerns around increased traffic, safety, and the lack of guaranteed pedestrian connectivity between phases. In addition, the plan does not yet ensure protections for existing infrastructure or adequate mitigation for the long-term construction impact on current residents. This development also presents a rare opportunity to secure meaningful greenway access and public amenities, which should be required as part of approval. Growth is understandable, but it must be balanced with clear commitments that protect current homeowners and improve overall quality of life.

4-L-26-RZ

Jason
37920

4-L-26-RZ
Jason (37920), March 19, 2026 at 8:17 PM

We met a few years ago to discuss how the members of the Sayne Lane community do not want any more rezoning to increase population density. This was already granted to a close property that was rezoned. Against the request of the community, Knox county granted an increase of density for that large tract making it into a large subdivision. This is enough. Based on that request, that should satisfy Knox County's desire for population increase. Clearly this is only to benefit the construction company to make more money with added freedom to sell more residences out side of the originally designed zone restrictions that the citizens of the communities found acceptable. STOP SELLING US OUT!

March 19, 2026
at 8:17 PM

March 19, 2026
at 9:24 PM

Hemant
37932

4-D-26-DP
Hemant (37932), March 19, 2026 at 9:24 PM

I'm a resident of Hayden Farms and strongly oppose this expansion. We moved here believing the neighborhood was complete, so this new construction is unexpected and disruptive. It feels like there are already water issues and areas we're fixing is still pending. Please find the attachment of how the water easement has been impacted at the entrance of this community. Also, the street lights have not turned on in one year from the time we've been here.

March 19, 2026
at 9:28 PM

Hemant
37932

4-D-26-DP
Hemant (37932), March 19, 2026 at 9:28 PM

Attachment
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260319212811.pdf

March 19, 2026
at 10:25 PM

Kathryn Fraser
37917

4-O-26-RZ
Kathryn Fraser (37917), March 19, 2026 at 10:25 PM

We ask that you do not permit Liquid Environmental Solutions (LES) to change their zoning to I-H. LES is imminent to a highly dense residential area and one of Knoxville's historic neighborhoods. Although we live over half a mile from the LES site, LES's activities can make being outside unbearable because of the strong, rotten-egg-like smell they produce. As another has documented, after LES's activities became increasingly reported they now appear to conduct their most odor-producing activities at night or early in the morning, before government offices are open and when enforcement is made difficult. (I have walked outside at 3:00 a.m. and nearly been knocked off my feet by the smell.) Liquid Environmental Solution's activities and the strong, continual odors they have produced have become a nuisance to the residents of Parkridge and, we are sure, to our neighbors in the surrounding area.

We ask that their request for I-H zoning be denied. They need to either move to an already I-H area where this kind of activity is appropriate, or be required to conduct their activities completely within an enclosed building.

4-K-26-RZ

Cynthia
37920

4-K-26-RZ
Cynthia (37920), March 20, 2026 at 3:22 PM

I'm commenting because this area is located in behind my home. I would like to have input if by chance there is a change that is going to allow growth on the hillside in the forest behind me has a large cavern. In the zoning change before, they were not going to build on the hillside. Why do they want to change this?

March 20, 2026
at 3:22 PM

March 20, 2026
at 7:06 PM

Kellen
37931

4-D-26-DP
Kellen (37931), March 20, 2026 at 7:06 PM

I know you guys will always approve an infinite amount of rezoning and building plans to allow the builders to cram as many houses in as small a space as possible. However, the responsible thing to do is also consider the improvements that can be done to these spaces to better accommodate the community and improve quality of life. There is a letter proposing additional greenway and creek access. This seems like a small price to pay for these filthy rich builders to give back in return for the county allowing them free reign to build whatever they want.

4-C-26-SU

Lea Ann
well

4-C-26-SU
Lea Ann (well ), March 20, 2026 at 9:14 PM

No message

March 20, 2026
at 9:14 PM

4-J-26-RZ

Jason
37920

4-J-26-RZ
Jason (37920), March 21, 2026 at 6:08 AM

I want to oppose this zoning change for this property to allow for commerce and any increase of density noting that this would prove challenging to the already increasing population that has been allowed through zoning. This is supposed to be an agricultural area, and should there be a desire to make a commercial location, not the land east of this location in the Mountain Grove area which is already zoned for such allowing for existing traffic for that purpose. Please do not continue to erode the rural setting our community expects based on existing zoning.

March 21, 2026
at 6:08 AM