July 8, 2021
Planning Commission meeting
Planning Commission meeting
Public Comments
138 Comments for
Justin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), February 12, 2021 at 1:37 PM
482 lots is WAY too many lots for that area. There is nothing that large in our entire community. This would create non stop traffic in my front yard around the clock. Justin (37871), February 12, 2021 at 1:37 PM
Sarah
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Sarah (37871), February 19, 2021 at 9:51 AM
The massive size of this subdivision is absolutely ridiculous for this area. Ruggles Ferry Road cannot support this much daily traffic. Most people have lived on this road their whole lives and have seen the traffic increase in the past few years and no one living on this road wants to see this increase dramatically. This is a rural area and while growth is welcomed, 482 houses is not needed/wanted for this community. Please consider downsizing the number of homes. You can profit just as much from nicer homes on larger lots.Sarah (37871), February 19, 2021 at 9:51 AM
Becca
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Becca (37871), February 22, 2021 at 10:30 AM
My house is directly across from the entrance to this MEGA-subdivision. This would create non-stop traffic on Ruggles Ferry and the connecting roads can not handle this traffic. The concept of this many houses does not fit with the current setting of this area. Becca (37871), February 22, 2021 at 10:30 AM
Kevin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kevin (37871), February 22, 2021 at 9:09 PM
I own and live on 12.5 acres adjoining this proposed dense subdivision. While I am not opposed to a subdivision that fits into the surrounding area, I am opposed to a subdivision that has almost 3 homes per acre. Most of the homes in this area are on 2 acres or more. One of the main reasons we moved from West Knoxville to this location 20 years ago is because it is more rural and has a country feel. A subdivision with this density would definitely take away from the attractiveness of this area. This proposed subdivision would not only dramatically increase traffic on Ruggles Ferry Road but would also decrease property values in the area. Kevin (37871), February 22, 2021 at 9:09 PM
Peggy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), February 25, 2021 at 7:57 AM
My family opposes this development. We moved here because of the rural nature of this community. North Ruggles Ferry Pike can not accommodate traffic from a subdivision of this magnitude. Please DO NOT approve this!Peggy (37871), February 25, 2021 at 7:57 AM
Kathy and Kraig
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kathy and Kraig (37871), February 27, 2021 at 8:55 AM
Please do not approve this development! As a family we live in East Knox County because of the quiet rural environment and the sense of belonging to a community that embraces nature, community and supports our farmers. We still have bald eagles flying in the skies and Otters, Beavers and Muskrates swimming in the Holsten River. The proposed development will have a significant impact on our environment, especially the Holsten River habitat. This development does not match the surrounding area, nor the intent of the community to maintain its rural heritage.Kathy and Kraig (37871), February 27, 2021 at 8:55 AM
The size of this development will have a significant impact on the infrastructure in our community. The impact on the feeder roads especially Burris Road, Pleasant Hill and Ruggles Ferry will create a level of traffic that will have dangerous results and a negative impact on noise levels, congestion and overall safety on our small rural roads.
Development is inevitable, however we ask that the County Commission represent the residence who live here presently and that you consideration the uniqueness of each part of our County and approve developments that enhance the East County community, not destroy it's very essence of rural living.
Bobby and Abby
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bobby and Abby (37871), March 1, 2021 at 4:15 PM
I do not agree with this new development as I am very concerned about the increase in traffic due to having small children and disruption of country side view. Bobby and Abby (37871), March 1, 2021 at 4:15 PM
Andrea
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Andrea (37871), March 1, 2021 at 10:25 PM
I added my comments as a PDF. This development really needs to be evaluated to the impact of the community around it.Andrea (37871), March 1, 2021 at 10:25 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210301222522.pdf
Kenzie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kenzie (37871), March 3, 2021 at 10:55 AM
see attachedKenzie (37871), March 3, 2021 at 10:55 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210303105556.pdf
Greg
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Greg (37871), March 3, 2021 at 2:49 PM
Not a fan of this project, I live nearby- I already can not get some services like quality home internet (Bellsouth DSL) , the poor signal i get will now be divided between 482 other households which will cause the signal to be much worse per Bellsouth. Traffic on Ruggles Ferry which is a rural road will not be safe. Even worse are the connecting roads to get to Asheville Hwy such as Cash Rd, Pleasant Hill, and Wooddale Rd which are not even two lane roads and could not safely support this amount of traffic. Greg (37871), March 3, 2021 at 2:49 PM
JUSTIN
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
JUSTIN (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:33 PM
See attached pdfJUSTIN (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:33 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210304153340.pdf
Brad
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:37 PM
This project will be terrible for the community and will turn people off to our area. It does not fit what the people of Carter want and needs to be dropped. Brad (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:37 PM
April
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
April (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:46 PM
The development of 482 lots on Ruggles Ferry Pike is not only going to be an eyesore for the area, but a logistical nightmare for the community. Traffic is already a problem early in the morning and later in the afternoons as people commute to school and work, and adding an additional 482 families is only going to make the experience worse. Additionally, Carter schools do not have the capacity to handle even half that amount of potential enrollees, and since Carter Elementary was recently renovated I can’t imagine it would be renovated once more to accommodate even more students any time soon.
The homes currently on and around Ruggles Ferry are generally large, expensive family homes, and to add almost 500 lower-end homes will not only add the problems mentioned above, but will greatly impact the property value of any homes in this area.
This is a project no one in the Carter community supports aside from those who are receiving the financial gain from it. It must be stopped to preserve our community. April (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:46 PM
Sherry
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Sherry (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:55 PM
This plan has way too many houses. The roads can not handle this much traffic. Secondary roads are very narrow. I am very concerned about this development. Sherry (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:55 PM
Kylie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kylie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:05 PM
I oppose the development of this high density development. Please consider a development plan that aligns to the current standards of the surrounding neighborhood. Kylie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:05 PM
Brandi
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brandi (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:22 PM
Ruggles Ferry cannot handle the traffic, the schools cannot handle that many more students. The beauty in Straw Plains is all the open land. Why does it have to be almost 500 homes stacked on top of each other, instead space them out and have and better quality built home especially in the area. Brandi (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:22 PM
Travis
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Travis (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:23 PM
I oppose the development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. This would be one of the largest and most dense developments in all of Knox County. Lessen the density. Travis (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:23 PM
Ann Marie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 5:36 PM
Please don’t allow this huge development to happen! There would be tremendous traffic congestion on our two lane rural road. I have lived on Graves Road for 50 of my 57 years and our community does not want such a huge development! How would the Carter schools even accommodate all of the potential children? All of the roads that feed into Asheville Highway are extremely narrow, so how would traffic be for those roads? Please, please let our community stay a small rural community!Ann Marie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 5:36 PM
Jessie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jessie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:09 PM
I am writing for concern and opposing the large development in our rural area. You can drive down Ruggles Ferry almost any sunny day and see people walking, running, walking their dogs and riding bikes. Not only does a development this size and number of houses not match the rural area, but it is dangerous to our community with the increase of traffic for our pedestrians. A development with reasonable and respectful homes is considerable. The one in question is greedy and not appropriate for the area. Jessie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:09 PM
Caroline
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Caroline (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:36 PM
I am opposed to the size and density of this development being nearly 3 homes per acre. I am concerned about the infrastructure needed to support a development of this size, as well as the impact that it will have on the school system, roads, environment, etc. I urge you to reconsider this development, or at the very least, to dramatically reduce the amount of homes reflected in the current plan. Caroline (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:36 PM
Anne
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Anne (37871), March 4, 2021 at 7:08 PM
I have lived in this community for over 50 years. I have seen a lot of changes, some good, some not so good. While I am open to the concept of a subdivision being built in our area I am strongly opposed to the density of this proposal. I would like to see it reduced to a maximum of 1 house per acre or preferably 2 acres. We are a rural farming community. My house is 1.5 miles from the end of my driveway to the main entrance of the proposed subdivision. In this 1.5 miles there are 6 operating farms (and 2 on the other side of the entrance) that have slow moving farm equipment traveling all hours of the day and night. With the added growth in the last few years Ruggles Ferry has become a Nascar speedway. It has no shoulders or sidewalks and in some places steep drop offs that could cause serious injury if your wheel slipped off the edge of the road. It will be a disaster going to happen when an additional 800 to 1000 cars are added. Ruggles Ferry and the smaller side roads that carry traffic to Asheville Highway cannot handle this additional load.Anne (37871), March 4, 2021 at 7:08 PM
This is a rural farming community and we would like for it to retain that atmosphere. We do not want it to become a West Knoxville. That is why we live HERE and not THERE.
Ashley
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ashley (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM
This is going to negatively affect my community. The traffic, the beauty of the farm land will be destroyed by this. That is the main reason we live here. Our community will be destroyed.
If this is something that goes through, The plan needs to be rethought. Take a look at the Hardin Valley community less houses bigger lots. Greenways, parks etc. This in someway should benefit the community if it goes in. We need a park for kids, an area families can gather, greenways for walking. That’s what this community needs. Ashley (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM
Betty
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Betty (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:46 AM
I oppose the development of 482 lots on Ruggles Ferry RD Betty (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:46 AM
Justin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:53 AM
I’m against the construction plan to build 482 on Blake Lane. Justin (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:53 AM
Becca
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Becca (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:09 AM
Good morning. I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed development, "Innsbruck Farms" planned for N Ruggles Ferry Pike at Blake Road, case file number 3-SB-21-C. I live directly across from the proposed entrance into this subdivision. 482 houses, I feel, does not fit the current setting of this area. There is nothing in our community that dense. The closest subdivision that could even compare is Shannon Valley Farms with 2.1 DU/Acre with 91 units on 154.7 acres. Innsbruck Farms is proposing 482 units on 171.88 acres. This is so misplaced for our community. Also the roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to main highways can't not support the amount of traffic that 482 houses will add. Cash Road, Burris Road, Arms Road and Pleasant HIll Road are all connecting roads that now can't handle the traffic. None of these roads are lined and most aren't wide enough for 2 cars while passing. Becca (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:09 AM
I'm not against development in our community, but I feel like this development does not have the community at heart.
Valerie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Valerie (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:34 AM
I am in opposition of the 485 house development being planned for Blake Lane. There is not adequate demand or infrastructure in that area for that many new homes. It should also be considered that less than a mile away Neals Landing is also being expanded to add hundreds of houses. Our current schools (especially Carter Elementary and Middle) do not have the space for students for a new build of this size. Those issues need to be addressed BEFORE a new subdivision of this size should even be considered. In addition, the land to house ratio of this proposed subdivision is WAY too low. If this passes I would hope it is at least for a lower number of houses on that amount of acreage to provide for a larger yard and maintain the standards set by the homes that have been built in that area in the last 20 years. And also requiring greenways and such like are being required in areas such as Hardin Valley will new subdivision development. The people of east Knox county deserve the same!Valerie (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:34 AM
Suzannah
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:23 AM
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed development of 482 lots off Ruggles Ferry Pike. I am a home owner less than a mile from this development. I do not feel the current landscape of the community will support this number of homes, families or vehicles on Ruggles Ferry. I hope you will reconsider the desires of the community and reject this proposal. Suzannah (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:23 AM
Pam
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:26 AM
Too many houses for this small area. Too much traffic for small roadsPam (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:26 AM
Brittany
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brittany (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM
I think this is a terrible idea...
It will crowed the Carter school community make the roads so busy Brittany (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM
Brad
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM
I am a member of the community and live less than a mile from the proposed site. I am writing to oppose the development. The landscape will not support the amount of homes projected on the development. Secondly, it will add an unacceptable and unsafe amount of traffic for Ruggles Ferry Pike and the surrounding roads. There are no roads in the area, other than Ruggles Ferry, to accommodate the amount of traffic the subdivision will bring. 428 homes times two cars (at least) each. That's close to 1000 vehicles on small country roads. I strongly support the denial of this development going forward and would hope the commission listens to the people it will effect the most. I urge the commission to vote against the development.Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM
Brad
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM
I am a member of the community and live less than a mile from the proposed site. I am writing to oppose the development. The landscape will not support the amount of homes projected on the development. Secondly, it will add an unacceptable and unsafe amount of traffic for Ruggles Ferry Pike and the surrounding roads. There are no roads in the area, other than Ruggles Ferry, to accommodate the amount of traffic the subdivision will bring. 428 homes times two cars (at least) each. That's close to 1000 vehicles on small country roads. I strongly support the denial of this development going forward and would hope the commission listens to the people it will effect the most. I urge the commission to vote against the development.Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM
travis
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
travis (37871), March 5, 2021 at 2:56 PM
Please see attached.
Thank youtravis (37871), March 5, 2021 at 2:56 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210305145606.pdf
Jody
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jody (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:27 PM
I am very concerned about the amount of traffic and the affect this project will have on our schools Jody (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:27 PM
Paul
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Paul (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:43 PM
Although not opposed to development, I believe this proposed project is completely inconsistent with the area. It should be approved at much less dense level.At least, please table this action until a later date to give more time for citizens review. Paul (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:43 PM
Darrell
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Darrell (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:31 PM
As a resident of the community I believe the proposed development is to large. The road network surrounding the development is not designed to accommodate the amount of traffic 482 new units would generate. Darrell (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:31 PM
Shirley
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shirley (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:12 AM
Dear Commissioners, Thank you for considering my concerns in the development known as,Innsbruck Farms. This 482 acre is one of the most dense proposals in the county. The traffic study indicates that more than 4,000 vehicles will will filter onto Ruggles Ferry and it's few subsidiary side streets. We are still proud to be an agricultural area. Farm equipment use Ruggles Ferry with slow-moving equipment. As you know, most of this two-lane road is double-lined, no pass zone. We have all witnessed what happens when frustrated drivers take risks.Shirley (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:12 AM
We are seeing a growth in our part of the county. I am aware of three other smaller developments being proposed. I am very concerned about the impact of this greatly increased student population will have on Carter Schools.
We respectfully ask that a decision be delayed since our community was only made aware of this impactful development. Thank you
Mary Gail
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary Gail (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:34 AM
I oppose the development of Innsbruck Farms as proposed. The housing density is not in keeping with immediate neighborhood and general east Knox County area. We choose to retire here over 5 years ago. After living in “subdivisions” in Dallas, Houston, and California, we were attracted to the slower pace semi-rural nature of this area. West Knoxville certainly offered more of the amenities we were accustomed to (shopping, doctors, restaurants) but we were willing to make the extra drive to enjoy surroundings of natural beauty and open spaces. We have seen too many blighted landscapes of cheek by jowl rooflines on postage stamp, scraped earth parcels of land. They are an abomination here, an insult to current residents and a testament to heedless & unconscionable profit mongering. I do not oppose all development. I do oppose this proposed plan of suffocating density. It does not belong in our neighborhood.Mary Gail (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:34 AM
Jeffrey
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jeffrey (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:52 AM
Let me first say that the meeting scheduled for Monday needs to be postponed to a later date. the citizens of this area need more time to gather facts, information, and plans to work in concert with the developer. I have not spoken to anyone who is against well planned and thought out growth and development. The proposed size and density of Innsbruck Farms brings with it many concerns, including but not limited too, dramatic traffic increase, sewage handling, traffic and pedestrian safety on Ruggles Ferry and connecting side roads, and current property values. This area does not have the infrastructure to handle a development of this size, and continue the quality of life for those who live here. I have lived on Ruggles Ferry for 57 years and have witnessed well planned growth and development. The proposed size of this development, and the safety concerns it brings is the exact opposite of well planned and thought out. The proposed Innsbruck Farms development is about nothing more than cramming in as many homes as possible, and making the most money possible, without concern for the surrounding community and the citizens who live here. As stated earlier, I am not against growth and development: however, I am opposed to development that is bereft of common sense, and concern for the surrounding community and its people. Thank you for your thought and attention regarding this urgent matter. Sincerely, Jeff McMillanJeffrey (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:52 AM
Garlena
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Garlena (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM
Please accept my letter of opposition for the Innsbruck Farms development proposed off Ruggles Ferry Pike.Garlena (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306110323.pdf
Donald
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:05 AM
Please accept this as my opposition to the Innsbruck Farms development proposed off Ruggles Ferry Pike.Donald (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:05 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306110555.pdf
Justin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:21 AM
I respectfully oppose the plans for Innsbruck Farms. Growth and development is good but it is a travesty to learn that the current plans for this development if not ratified would result in the most densely populated subdivision in Knox county. We are not west Knoxville. We do not have the infrastructure, developments, schools and other public amenities to support a development of 482 lots in this area especially considering other planned developments in this area. The people of our community need the MPC to support our opposition and vote to limit the number of lots in this development. We support the decision to develop but this level of density will be a detriment to our community and the proposal clearly doesn’t take into consideration the negative impacts on our residents. Rather it’s only about squeezing in the most homes to make the most profits possible for the developer and land owner. Please consider to delay and oppose the current plans so that we may keep everyone’s best interests in consideration. Thanks Justin Cate Justin (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:21 AM
Jeanine
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jeanine (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:25 AM
I am opposed to the proposed development, (Innsbruck) , on the basis of the density of # of homes per acre. 480 homes is way out of line if you consider the already established area surrounding the Innsbruck project. I strongly encourage you to table your vote re: Innsbruck. more time to consider other ratios within reason. The affect this project will have long term is far too important and should not be rushed through. This was just brought to our attention in the last month. In summary..... concerns are: traffic increase; peaceful setting that we invested in; impact on wildlife; community safety; further impact regarding increased interest in future developments.Jeanine (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:25 AM
Jim and Donna
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jim and Donna (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:34 AM
We are concerned and opposed to the subject development in our area. Reasons for this opposition include the impact on the traffic on 2-lane Ruggles Ferry Pike and also side roads that are sometimes difficult to maneuver because of the roads being narrow and winding. We see new housing going on around us continually, but the number proposed for this area seems unreasonable and would like to see a reduction in the number of houses on this property. Another concern is about the schools in the area being able to handle the possible increase in students. Thank you for taking the time to hear our community's concerns.Jim and Donna (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:34 AM
Jessica
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jessica (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:26 PM
My family lives 2 miles from new development that is proposing 482 homes. We are 100% against this. Our small two lane road cannot accommodate such traffic. We are very concerned for the safety of our community. Jessica (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:26 PM
Julia
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Julia (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:47 PM
My husband and I strongly disagree with this high-density planned development with crowding homes on small lots when the uniformity of the surrounding area is lots at a minimum of 1 acre. Reasons as an insufficient traffic safety was performed during a pandemic, a Level 3 Traffic Study is requested. Existing infrastructure issues now and an increase of 482 homes will only impact that further. The duration of living through a construction zone for 10 years. The horrible affect on the living creatures in the environment. Safety concern of traffic issues with accessing our homes.Julia (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:47 PM
We oppose this high-density development but would appreciate a lower-density development of 1 acre per home at a minimum, for our safety and livelihood.
Pam
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), March 6, 2021 at 2:21 PM
I am seriously concerned about the traffic safety issues and the overwhelming burden the Innsbrook Farms development would place on our schools in the Carter community. I vehemently oppose the proposed development plan. Thank you.Pam (37871), March 6, 2021 at 2:21 PM
Randy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Randy (37871), March 6, 2021 at 7:46 PM
I attended a meeting this evening requested by the property interests and developer. After two hours of presentation and a Q&A session, I request the Planning Commission postpone a final determination on this concept plan.The reasons are the suddenness of the proposal and comments from the meeting today. By his own admission, the developer is in various stages of completing a website for the development, working on some safety and traffic concerns, considering amenities (non motorized vehicle access to the river, sidewalks, dog park, etc.), and finalizing covenants and restrictions.I support quality, safe, and sustainable development. I am very concerned that this very dense development will have unintended consequences for our community and result in very similar traffic/safety concerns endemic to This west Knox County.This is not consistent with the rural nature of East Knox County. Folks moving to our end of the county are not looking for this type dense neighborhood. This is an opportunity for the planning staff to have think a little out of the box for a unique neighborhood.If the county wants this type of development then maybe the county should fund some of the safety concerns expressed by my neighbors in our meeting today.Randy (37871), March 6, 2021 at 7:46 PM
RONNIE
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
RONNIE (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:21 PM
The current development of 482 lots for houses that are going be built takes no true data showing the roads can handle the traffic. A vehicle count was taken only on one end of Ruggles Ferry which receives the least traffic. The west end is the most traveled due to the majority are headed to West Knoxville to work. The is a major safety issue for the current community. The houses that surround that have recently been built are on at least one acre to five acre tracts of land and most all wouldn’t have built if they knew this was going to happen. The feeder roads such as Burris Road and Cash road are not adequate for two vehicles to pass in certain sections. The concern is pollution to the Holstein River from run off and holding ponds. Such beautiful farm land to be cut up with such poor planning. Not happy with development but at least could have been one house per acre to keep our rural area safe and not so congested.RONNIE (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:21 PM
Shannon
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM
I strongly oppose Innsbruck development as proposed. It is too dense of a project and poses a safety risk to this area. I am attaching a PDF file.Shannon (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306222816.pdf
Elizabeth
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Elizabeth (37871), March 7, 2021 at 8:18 AM
As a homeowner whose property adjoins this proposed development, I plead with the MPC to reject this concept plan. A bird's-eye view of Ruggle's Ferry Road reveals that the density of this planned subdivision is wholly out of sync with the character of this community. Twenty-five years ago, my husband and I bought nearly thirteen acres at auction and built our dream home here. We relocated from a crowded Cedar Bluff subdivision so that we could raise our four children in a place where they had room to explore, wildlife to observe, and fresh air to breathe in safety. We envisioned our grandchildren enjoying the same blessings. If the MPC approves this concept plan, you will allow this developer to bring West Knoxville to my backyard, literally---twenty lots squeezed along my property line. Please send this developer back to the drawing board. This property should be developed in a more intelligent, more respectful way that adds value to our beautiful community.Elizabeth (37871), March 7, 2021 at 8:18 AM
Vicki
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Vicki (37871), March 7, 2021 at 1:07 PM
Hello, My family and I moved from a busy east Knoxville neighborhood to a beautiful 10 acre property on Shackleford Lane 7 years ago, mainly because we needed land and a barn for our six horses. Our property is very typical of other properties in this beautiful community, most houses on 5 to 15 acres aside from the large farms that remain and are actively being farmed. A high density subdivision simply does not match this community nor are the roads able to accommodate safely the kind of traffic this number of houses would bring in. Therefore we are strongly opposed to this developer's plan.Vicki (37871), March 7, 2021 at 1:07 PM
Donna
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donna (37871), March 7, 2021 at 6:39 PM
The proposed development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry is way too many for this area. The additional number of automobiles on this stretch of the road will be very dangerous for the residents that already live along the road. They could very well be taking their lives in their hands just to walk across the road to get their mail.
This community is small and rural and the residents that live there want it to remain that way. The time it will take to construct all this development will cause damage to this setting. The developer and the seller of the property are only interested in MONEY. They don't care how much this project will inconvenience the current residents. They don't care how all of the equipment going back and forth will damage the roads. They don't care how the noise will affect the peace of the neighborhood.
The development should not be permitted.
Donna (37871), March 7, 2021 at 6:39 PM
Shannon
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:38 AM
I am writing to oppose 3-SB-21-C a new development in East Knoxville near Ruggles Ferry Golf Course. I have included a letter that I would appreciate you taking the time to read and consider. Shannon (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:38 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308083847.pdf
Allen
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Allen (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:00 AM
We oppose the Innsbruck Farms development. The concept plan shows 482 lots on 171 acres. The current infrastructure along Ruggles Ferry Pike cannot handle this type of development. Allen (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:00 AM
Michael (Bo)
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Michael (Bo) (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:28 AM
Please see attached letter dated 03-08-2021Michael (Bo) (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:28 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308092809.pdf
Stanley
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Stanley (37871), March 8, 2021 at 11:41 AM
Concerning the plan to build 482 homes on 171 Acres or 2.8 homes per acre. Concern #1 traffic on Ruggles Ferry Pk, which is already a busy 2 lane road. With 482 homes and 2 cars per home there would be 964 vehicles. To get to Ashville Highway many would travel Buris Rd., Cash Rd., or Weeddale Rd. All are very narrow and heavily populated with many children playing and people walking and riding bikes; they will not be able to handle this amount of traffic. Recent traffic count paid for by the developer on the other end of Ruggles going toward Strawberry Plains does not come close to the amount of traffic going toward Knoxville or the interstate. This amount of traffic on these narrow roads will cause many accidents, as well as, serious injuries and deaths. This property has 2 creeks that empty into the Holston River. The current plan to build this many homes cannot contain run off and will pollute the river. This amount of homes will also overpopulate Carter Schools. Construction using heavy equipment and trucks will destroy Ruggles Ferry Pk. This community does not attempt to keep from growing. This property could be a very nice development with larger lots and houses. This type of development will destroy our community as I have known it for 78 years. Please do your job and help our community to reach a better plan for the number of homes on this property.Stanley (37871), March 8, 2021 at 11:41 AM
Susan & Tom
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Susan & Tom (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:44 PM
We are opposed to the Innsbruck Farms proposal as submitted. See pdf attachment.Susan & Tom (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:44 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308124430.pdf
Brandon & Kendra
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brandon & Kendra (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:45 PM
We oppose the development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. The numbers of houses is way too much for this area. Our farmers on tractors up and down this road are now in danger due to the high traffic that this development will bring. Our roads are now in danger. Our school system in the Carter community is not even equipped for this. We truly love our small and RURAL community and how we wish it could stay this way. This development should NOT be permitted. We strongly oppose.Brandon & Kendra (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:45 PM
Tim
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tim (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:03 PM
I live near the proposed development and I am strongly opposed to this Concept Plan and the negative impact on our community. I am supportive of well thought out planned development, but this plan fails in so many areas. This is one of the largest and highest density plans in all of Knox County to build 482 homes in our community. Our rural community will have major negative impact on our traffic, safety, infrastructure, side or feeder roads, and change the perspective of our entire rural character forever! This plan is not in alignment with the East Knox County Sector and East Knox Community Plans that were provided to give guidance for these types of future developments - in fact this is contrary to all of the primary objectives of those plans for future well thought out development. The traffic study accompanying this plan calls for significant recommendations from the negative impact of 4,400+ new daily trips as a result of this new planned development. I respectfully request a postponement of the March 11th meeting and allow our community 30-60 days to respond to the developer on this plan which is still being changed weekly. Thanks for your consideration. Tim (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:03 PM
Bill
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bill (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:14 PM
See attached fileBill (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:14 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308141419.pdf
Mary Beth
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:23 PM
As a lifetime resident of this community, I am writing to oppose the massive Innsbruck Farms subdivision. I am not opposed to a property owner wanting to develop his land nor am I opposed to welcome new neighbors. But anyone can look and see how our rural community looks. This obnoxiously sized subdivision does nothing to offer beneficial growth. Its throwing in 482 homes that our roads, schools and even emergency services can not support. It will ruin the community for those of us who have loved and supported and want the best for not just ourselves but for our neighbors as well. We politely and strongly urge you to refuse this massive development and encourage the developer to plan a development that benefits not only him but the whole community. I also ask that you consider yourself personally in this matter and what you would want if you were faced with a neighborhood destroying development. Please allow our community to keep its rural setting Mary Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:23 PM
Hali
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Hali (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:25 PM
I read an article stating there was no way to stop the build of this subdivision, but is there any way to tremendously downsize? Residents of this area love that they have big yards, and livable ground. Putting this many houses in one area will not only be an eye sore, it will absolutely take away from the rural part of our community. Not to mention traffic concerns. There's a projected 1,000 car increase, and that's not what we need, especially in this particular area. Blake Lane is a dead end road, it's quiet, no traffic, we don't want, or need subdivision access on our road. We like quiet, laid back, and we most certainly love the view that we have without adding almost 500 houses and tons of cars in and out. This isn't the city. I understand the builders and contractors making money and creating revenue, but I don't believe it should be done at the expense of the Ruggles Ferry community. Hali (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:25 PM
Catherine
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Catherine (37871), March 8, 2021 at 6:03 PM
Hello, I am a member of the Carter Community and very concerned about this proposed development. While I am not opposed to forward progress and development as a whole, the size and range of homes proposed as part of this plan are unfortunately not in alignment with the surrounding area nor reflective of the type of development most desired by the community. There are numerous subdivisions already established in our community, two of which are currently expanding, that offer the same housing options that are being proposed. What our community doesn't have, and can support, is a housing range that is a step higher offering larger lots with custom homes that is complementary to what is already being built in that area. Personally, my family, and several like mine that have ties to and are grounded in this community, are looking for homes in the $400k and up range that have more spacious lots. Continuing on with this proposed plan will also very likely drive many of the invested families that have built nearby to move elsewhere outside of our community. That means they are also taking their economic value with them and unfortunately leaving a large void in their wake. The goal would be to build up our community value not diminish it. I hope you consider not moving forward with such a large development that doesn't support a long term need and does not serve our community. Thank you.Catherine (37871), March 8, 2021 at 6:03 PM
Jeff
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jeff (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:35 PM
I feel that the housing density of this planned subdivision is to much for the area it is in. I am not opposed to developing the land just not at this volume with more land in the area that has the ability to be developed in the future. It will put the poeple on this road in a dangerous future if the density is allowed to start at this rateJeff (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:35 PM
Beth
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:18 PM
The proposed development of Innsbruck Farms should be reconsidered in regards to the number of houses intended to be built. A sudden growth of such magnitude for this area would greatly negatively affect the present surroundings. Further accurate assessments of the traffic situation should be performed to see the true ramifications of the proposed addition of 483 homes on the rural country roads running near this property. I am not opposed to the development taking place, but feel a reduction of homes involved would be better suited for the area. Doubling the lot sizes and reducing the number of homes in half would seem like a reasonable resolution to consider. I understand the necessity of business and profit, but feel this should not supersede doing the right thing in development of this project. I ask that more time be given to reconsider the present plan and make changes that would be more appropriate for the community while still providing a reasonable profit for the developer. Thank you.Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:18 PM
David
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:26 PM
The density of this development is outrageous in comparison to the other properties in the area. I do not oppose the development, just the totally ridiculous decision to pack so many houses into it and then overload the area regarding traffic and utilities. This development just does not fit nor belong in this area in its presently proposed density. My family has been in East Knox County since the 1850’s and I have lived on Ruggles Ferry Pike the past 15 years. The rural character of this area should be preserved as much as possible even as it is understood that growth and development are inevitable. The responsible way to address the issue is to propose a plan that fits the area regarding lot sizes and house density. It is readily apparent that there has been an attempt to maximize the potential profit of a packed subdivision at the expense of preserving the character of the area. Please allow time for these matters to be respectfully discussed so that any reasonable alternatives can be explored regarding density and so that further evaluation of the effects on traffic and utilities can be properly assessed. Thank you. David L. Parker, DDSDavid (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:26 PM
Mary
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 8:21 AM
This plan will overwhelm the community. The roads, schools and businesses are not designed to have this many people. It will change the integrity of the community and is not welcomed. Change and growth are both invited, this change is too traumic for this community. Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 8:21 AM
David
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), March 9, 2021 at 9:12 AM
Please see attached letter of opposition for 3-SB-21-C.David (37871), March 9, 2021 at 9:12 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309091232.pdf
Mary
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:34 AM
I add my voice of opposition to the Concept Plan for this property. I second the concerns others have expressed about traffic, safety, burden on schools & infrastructure. Mr Chrisman admitted at our meeting with him on Saturday night that he has not performed due diligence....he has not performed market demand analysis to truly assess what buyers want. He stated”I know what demand is from builders.” He also seemed surprised to learn how much large (1-2+acres) have sold for recently, with larger, upscale homes built....homes that “fit” into the pastoral feel of the area. Homes like those surrounding his proposed development. When asked if he could consider building fewer homes on larger lots, he stated “the numbers don’t work.” Well of course we get it....scraping the land, building miles of roads and sewer lines is expensive. Perhaps those “numbers” could be different if he rethinks his plan, let’s go of his ego and works towards a different understanding of the best use of this property. He might make “the number” work with fewer roads, fewer sewers, fewer houses. Mr Chrisman should be sent back to his drawing board. We are people here, not numbers.Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:34 AM
jay
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
jay (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:53 AM
Lot sizes are to small for the development. The houses near there are on over half an acre. I would like the developer to make the lot sizes bigger so it will maintain house value in that area. jay (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:53 AM
Catie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Catie (37871), March 9, 2021 at 11:03 AM
Please reconsider allowing this development of over 400 new homes on Ruggles Ferry. My husband and I recently moved back home to Strawberry Plains with hopes of raising our children in a more rural area after spending the last 10 years living in large cities like Charlotte and Atlanta. We are currently building a home that will now be directly beside the entrance to this subdivision. I’m obviously concerned about the safety of my kids as they play in our yard, the traffic that will come considering there’s no infrastructure to support the added travelers, the overcrowding that will happen to the schools, the environmental impact that it will have on the river, and the way a subdivision this size would change the rural feel of this community that so many love and want to protect. Catie (37871), March 9, 2021 at 11:03 AM
kevin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 1:26 PM
I am opposed to this development as it is currently planned. kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 1:26 PM
This is too much to add to this community without tremendous county (taxpayer) investment in road and other improvements. Even with those improvements, it would drastically lower the quality of life for current residents, especially during the proposed 10 year period of construction.
The Ajax transportation impact study included in the case information on the MPC website is missing about 60 pages. This is over 70% of the report that community members can't see. What's on those 60 pages? I think if it laid out plans and definite timelines showing everything would be fine, it would be there. As it is, we don't even know what was considered and what was overlooked. Is this even legal, to withhold this much of a report vital to the plan's consideration from the area stakeholders (residents)?
My more specific comments are in the attached letter. Please read it!
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309132658.pdf
kevin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 5:38 PM
The developer is proposing 482 homes on 172 acres in this development. This calculates out to 2.80 dwelling units/acre. The knox county mpc has a useful tool to help picture what this would look like.
The tool can be found at https://maps.knoxmpc.org/apps/DensityExplorer. If you will search ONLY detached housing units and set the DU/Acre slider to 2.7 to 2.8, one of the developments shown will be Creekside Manor in Hardin Valley. It's the small blue box closest to Loudon county on the map and has 2.8 dwelling units per acre according to the stats. Click on the box for aerial views to see what that looks like. That's the density the developer is planning for Innsbruck Farms. Fits in here---NOT!
kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 5:38 PM
ALLEN
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
ALLEN (37871), March 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTSALLEN (37871), March 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309193835.pdf
Nathan
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Nathan (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:10 PM
We moved to Blake Lane in 2016 as a way for our severely autistic daughter to finally get peace and quiet away from a neighborhood. We have had many instances where she has had severe seizures and life or death was literally decided by a matter of minutes. Ambulances have not had to worry about fighting through traffic to get to our house. This development would change that. If there were an accident on any of the roads between us and the paramedics because of the increased vehicle count, they could arrive to us too late. In addition, when getting off the interstate at Asheville Highway after work each day, I already have to wait ten minutes just to get from the exit ramp on Interstate 40 to John Sevier. I can’t imagine what all the additional cars from this development would do to the after-work commute for all of us. Nathan (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:10 PM
Joshua
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Joshua (37871), March 10, 2021 at 9:17 AM
The proposed subdivision is too dense for the infrastructure and the community it will be part of. The local roads are not prepared to absorb an additional 1000 vehicles and the side roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to Asheville Hwy are barely wide enough for two cars to pass as is. Joshua (37871), March 10, 2021 at 9:17 AM
Increasing the traffic by that level will not only be a nuisance to existing residents but will pose a safety hazard for other drivers and the pedestrians I see walking on Ruggles Ferry daily. There are no sidewalks or other safe areas in our community for seniors and community members to walk near their homes and this would be removing that as an option.
While I don't oppose development, this level of density will not only impact the traffic on local homes, it will also change the rural feel of our community. It would be an overall negative to quality of life and place a burden on other community members.
Home lots should be restricted to 1 acre minimum at the smallest.
Cara Beth
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Cara Beth (37871), March 10, 2021 at 6:00 PM
I am not opposed to growth in the community. I am a real estate agent and I understand the need for more housing in this area. Growth is a great thing for the community however this is a rural area and the roads and schools are not equipped to handle a development this dense. I think the residents of this area need more time to hopefully reach a compromise with the developer so that this new development will become a positive asset to our wonderful community instead of something that will push out the current residents who love it so much. Cara Beth (37871), March 10, 2021 at 6:00 PM
Donald
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), March 10, 2021 at 11:52 PM
Strongly oppose this development, for the numerous reasons detailed by the 136 other people commenting thus far.Donald (37871), March 10, 2021 at 11:52 PM
Too large and too crowded of a development for the area.Plan is totally out of character for the area.Traffic study is flawed: done in wrong direction (eastbound, not westbound) on one day only, during a pandemic when most people stayed home--does not represent the true situation.
please deny this application to overbuild a quiet, rural community.
Peggy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), March 17, 2021 at 6:52 PM
I am very strongly opposed to this development. Traffic study was flawed in that the counter was in front of my house on the east side of the development near A.J. High on a cold January day during a pandemic when most people were working from home. Most of the traffic will turn west towards Knoxville. Ruggles Ferry and the feeder side roads are not designed to handle the traffic. Schools are almost at capacity now. Does not fit with our rural environment. Please consider the surrounding community when looking at this proposal. We are still a farming community and want to retain our rural way of life.Peggy (37871), March 17, 2021 at 6:52 PM
Nancy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Nancy (37871), March 30, 2021 at 12:06 PM
We have several issues with Innsbruck Farms (Case #3-SB-21-C) and the proposed +/- 500 homes. First the density of the development does not even come close to matching the existing rural area of the Ruggles Ferry Community. Second is the traffic study. One study was completed on Ruggles Ferry Pike. There should be additional studies done on the feeder roads that lead to Andrew Johnson Highway. These roads include Cash Road, Burris Road, Wooddale Road and Pleasant Road. Once the commission sees these studies they will be able to see that the area cannot currently support and additional 4,500 to 5,000 additional trips by passenger cars, school busses, delivery vehicles, farm equipment and construction trucks. Third would be the capacities of our area utilities. None of the utilities have given a definitive answer if the current water, sewer, electrical, gas and sanitation would be able to handle a surge of +/- 500 homes in the area. The best answer given has been "we think". Lastly, has an environmental study been done on the acreage yet? It could be an ecological disaster if a protected specie resides inside that area and is discovered after any type of land development has begun. It is obvious that much more thought and planning needs to go into this development before any approval can be submitted and allowing the developer to move forward.Nancy (37871), March 30, 2021 at 12:06 PM
Fred
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Fred (37871), March 31, 2021 at 9:41 PM
I have great concern for this development because of the number of houses planned and the limited road access to the site. None of the roads that would access the planned site are capable of handling the traffic flow that would be generated by this number of houses. Most of these roads (except for Ruggles Ferry) are narrow country roads that will not allow for a traffic flow of the volume that would result. Please consider limiting the number of houses that would be built in the development. I am not opposed to the development, just to the size of it/number of houses and traffic volume.Fred (37871), March 31, 2021 at 9:41 PM
Susan
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Susan (37871), June 14, 2021 at 5:39 PM
Please consider this an addendum to an earlier message I sent in opposition to the Innsbruck Farms proposal as submitted. This morning (6/14/2021) in daylight, many oppositional signs displayed in neighbors' yards in our community, were removed by some unknown individual(s). This kind of behavior is just as shocking and disappointing as when it occurs during election seasons. While it is likely that we will never know where responsibility may lie, or if it was a poorly hatched prank, the reality is only signs related to the proposed subdivision were targeted. This juvenile conduct has no real bearing on the decisions you make regarding this proposal, but I feel COMPELLED to emphasize our community is NOT resistant to responsible development that will enhance all of the Ruggles Ferry area, and preserve the safety and serenity we enjoy and would like to share with others. (High density housing and choking traffic is inconsistent with responsible.) It is alarming to consider that civil discourse might be discounted when all we hope for is what will be best for our community and Knox County. An ideal outcome for the Ruggles Ferry community would be for Innsbruck Farms to be a model for future development in Knox County and elsewhere.Susan (37871), June 14, 2021 at 5:39 PM
Thomas
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Thomas (37871), July 5, 2021 at 1:38 PM
The amount of homes being proposed is very inconsistent with the current density of the area. Traffic alone will increase risk to all people who currently live in the area. Traffic accidents will increase!Thomas (37871), July 5, 2021 at 1:38 PM
Bo
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bo (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:00 AM
Please review the attached letter in regards to opposing the Innsbruck Farms Development. This 480+ home planned community is by far outside the density of the Ruggles Ferry Community. Concerns noted in the letter are the feeder roads to Asheville Highway, additional +/-4,400 daily trips down our roads, property value decline, current electrical, water and sewer grids and sanitation. This development will come very close to doubling the amount of homes in our area with nothing being done by the county in preparation for this. Bo (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:00 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210706100002.pdf
Fred
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Fred (37871), July 6, 2021 at 8:58 PM
I have lived in the Ruggles Ferry area for 22 years. As I consider the ramifications of the 3-SB-21-C development, I cannot believe that MPC would allow this as proposed. There is no way these roads can handle the amount of traffic that would be generated as a result of 475 homes in this small of an area. The traffic studies that have been done had major flaws, and seem to be extremely biased toward "railroading" a decision. With only 2 access points to 475 homes, traffic would be a nightmare.Utilities would drastically change, and it would have a major impact on the Carter schools, which would fall back on the county to deal with and pay for.The developer has advertised 'waterfront property' but the elevation in the designated area makes water access impossible. No consideration has been given to the environmental fallout this would cause. Where are the studies for that?This proposal is completely out of character for the surrounding area.I think I am safe in saying there is no way that any of our planning commission members would approve a development like this in their own area.Please deny the present proposal and ask the developer to come back with a reasonable plan.Thank you.Fred (37871), July 6, 2021 at 8:58 PM
Emily
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Emily (37871), July 6, 2021 at 9:50 PM
I go on record in opposition to the proposed development at Innsbruck Farms. I respectfully request Commission members take the time to actually READ these public comments posted on this case. I will not restate….since many many others have well articulated our reasons for not wanting a development of such density. I share those concerns. I share their opposition. Thank you for your time & consideration.Emily (37871), July 6, 2021 at 9:50 PM
Tim
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tim (37871), July 6, 2021 at 9:57 PM
The residents of the Ruggles Ferry Community are unified in our opposition to this Concept Plan. We are very supportive of well thought out plans that create new opportunities in our community. Unfortunately, this plan is not that. It is complete opposite and not in alignment with the surrounding community. If this plan was for 150 homes on minimum 1 acre lots with other variants sizes of lots larger, the community would embrace and support that plan and welcome new neighbors as we have done throughout our history. Our residents currently opposed to this plan, own over 6,000 acres in the community and the land owners and developer own 201 acres. It is sad that residents who own 99.99% of the road frontage and 6,000 acres that is opposed to this development, have to endure developments such as this as "math exercises" to make massive profits to force disruption, and destruction in our community. Tim (37871), July 6, 2021 at 9:57 PM
Our community is a very special place and we respectfully request the MPC to DENY this concept plan application or make significant requirements to revise this plan to be more harmonious with the community regarding density, traffic, safety and alignment with the rural character of our community.
Anne
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Anne (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:08 PM
I strongly urge you to deny the Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan 3-SB-21-C. I am not against developing this property but I am against the density of the development and the problems it will bring.Anne (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:08 PM
I live on the corner of Ruggles Ferry Pike and Graves Road. Between the main entrance to Innsbruck Farms which is 1 1/2 miles from my driveway there are 5 working farms that touch Ruggles Ferry. Ours being one of these. On the east side of the main entrance are another 2 working farms. That is a total of 7 working farms that use Ruggles Ferry every day. We have many slow moving tractors, equipment and other farm vehicles that use Ruggles Ferry each day. How do you think these are going to compete with an additional 4400 car trips per day. This is a safety issue for my husband, my son and my grandson. Essentially this is going to put us out of business. We not only lose our income but our way of life that we have worked so hard to hang on too. My husband's grandparents purchased this farm in the early part of the 1940's. My husband was born on this farm, as were our children and grandchildren. We all still live here together. We are 5 generations living and working on this farm.
This development will destroy our community. Please, I urge you to deny this subdivision concept plan.
Amy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Amy (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:15 PM
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASEAmy (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:15 PM
Vote NO on Innsbruck Farms. Fire zoning laws, recent traffic studies, wetland preservation and bald eagle conservation clearly provide evidence of a lack of infrastructure, safety issues and potential ecological violations.
This monstrosity of a build among rural homes and farmland will destroy the beautiful landscape forever and cause irreversible damage to our community and the environment. Please stop this build.
Bill
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bill (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:26 PM
I am urging you to deny Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan 3-SB-21-C. Bill (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:26 PM
The idea of 475 homes on 171 acres is so far out of step with our community that words are hard to come by to express my total adversity to this plan. The people who live in this community have space of their own to enjoy life. The vast majority of our community would welcome a development with bigger lots and houses (150 to 200 dwellings on this property). By building 475 houses on small lots, with concrete driveways with 5.2 miles of roads, removal of the woodland already on this property, there will be a irreversible effect on the environment in our neighborhood.
I fine it very offensive that we as a community have to give up our enjoyment and peacefulness so the developer who has never lived here and the project manager can follow their greed for money when all the rest of the community will suffer forever. We will loose our peace and tranquility we have enjoyed for years.
I am 74 years old and have lived on the same piece of land my entire life. I have farmed this land and still do along with my son and grandson. I also have neighbors that still farm in the Ruggles Ferry area. Safety is a big issue for us since we use Ruggles Ferry with our slow moving farm equipment.
I beg you to deny this 475 home concept because it will destroy the peacefulness and the safety of this community.
Peggy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM
I am strong opposed to 3-SB-21-C. Please deny this request.Peggy (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM
Suzannah
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:30 PM
I’d like to submit to you my opposition to the development of Innsbruck Farms. I was born and raised on Ruggles Ferry and my husband and I purchased 5 acres on which to raise our family. We currently have three teenagers and one of the biggest concerns I have is the traffic a subdivision that size would yield on Ruggles Ferry. We chose to build in this area with a more rural feel. The development of a subdivision with 400 plus homes does not fit the landscape of this community. Please consider all our community members have expressed to you & deny the request of this plan!Suzannah (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:30 PM
Connie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Connie (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:32 PM
This proposal is so far outside of what the rest of the area is like. It will affect traffic and safety, property values, schools, and environment in a negative way. The developer is unwilling to make any significant compromises, and the changes he has made are laughable. He says "the math doesn't work" but in actuality what it will cost the residents and Knox County is a much bigger stretch than anything he can show. Please deny this proposal - it does not consider the residents in the area and only put money in the pockets of one individual or company.Connie (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:32 PM
Pam
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:40 PM
Please DENY this concept plan. Too many houses for our neighborhood with too much traffic congestion.Pam (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:40 PM
Donald
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:48 PM
Please deny approval of this development which is ridiculously too large for this rural area and its infrastructure. Please listen to an entire community that is joined in opposition to the plan. Donald (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:48 PM
Jennifer
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jennifer (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:18 PM
Please don’t let greed surpass common sense.Jennifer (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:18 PM
Bobby
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bobby (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:28 PM
My family and I oppose this development strongly. Please reconsider for the safety of the kids on this road. This area does not have this amount of housing and do not feel it is safe. Bobby (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:28 PM
David
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:34 PM
Ruggles Ferry Road is not Middlebrook Pike. It cannot possibly handle the additional 4,420 vehicular trips per weekday projected by the traffic study for this proposed project. It couldn’t even handle half that number. The safety of every individual in this community depends on the wisdom and common sense of the MPC. Please deny this proposal.David (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:34 PM
Suzannah
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:44 PM
I am opposed to this large of a development on the allotted land. There will be an overwhelming number of cars on Ruggles Ferry and its small feeder roads that will completely alter the aesthetic of the area. Suzannah (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:44 PM
David
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), July 7, 2021 at 2:57 AM
Having lived on Ruggles Ferry Pike for over 15 years and having had family in the area for over 150 years, I have great concerns over the proposed Innsbruck Farm Development that is coming before the committee for a vote this Thursday. This development is in no way representative of other residences in the area regarding lot sizes and total of number of houses requested to be built. The roads in the area will not adequately accommodate such a tremendous influx of daily travel that will result from the number of homes proposed. This is a rural area with numerous farms and regular travel of tractors on the roadway. It is a quiet, serene neighborhood with families who decided to move here for that reason. I understand growth will occur, but I feel this should be done in a reasonable and responsible manner. This egregious proposition by the developers of Innsbruck Farms should be rejected due to the total inappropriateness of the request. The development does not fit with the area and there have been insufficient traffic studies to accurately show the demise to the community that this project will cause. I ask that you speak for us in disallowing this proposal to continue. Our ability as common citizens is limited, but you have the entrusted authority to stand up for us. Please do so.David (37871), July 7, 2021 at 2:57 AM
James
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
James (37871), July 7, 2021 at 5:29 AM
Please vote no to this proposal. Traffic nightmare.James (37871), July 7, 2021 at 5:29 AM
William and Shirley
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
William and Shirley (37871), July 7, 2021 at 6:31 AM
As requested in previous correspondences, please preserve the character of our neighborhoods, the purity of our River, and the safety of all who live and travel Ruggles Ferry Pike. Your understanding of our plight is essential.William and Shirley (37871), July 7, 2021 at 6:31 AM
Bo
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bo (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:19 AM
This concept plan needs to be denied. Community cannot support this many houses and daily trips.Bo (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:19 AM
Shannon
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:37 AM
I am still very much OPPOSED to the development of Innsbruck Farms as proposed. Shannon (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:37 AM
Ann Marie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:48 AM
We DON'T want 475 homes in our neighborhood, we don't want the additional traffic on our rural roads, we don't want 10 YEARS of construction. We want to maintain our rural, country characteristic.Ann Marie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:48 AM
Ann Marie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:48 AM
We DON'T want 475 homes in our neighborhood, we don't want the additional traffic on our rural roads, we don't want 10 YEARS of construction. We want to maintain our rural, country characteristic.Ann Marie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:48 AM
Sharon
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Sharon (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:58 AM
Please deny the plan for Innsbruck Farms on Ruggles Ferry. My husband has lived on Ruggles Ferry for 60 years, and myself for 40 years. We own two homes that will be impacted by this development. Please consider the safety issues that a development of this size will have on the citizens of Ruggles Ferry.Sharon (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:58 AM
Davina
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Davina (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:59 AM
I’m concerned about this large of a development in this community. Concerned for the impact on the Holston River and the area wildlife of both the river and land. Concerned for the impact on Carter schools, large volume of traffic, and road conditions. Too many houses!Davina (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:59 AM
Stacey
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Stacey (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:00 AM
We oppose!! Do not overload this community with traffic, crime, noise pollution. We moved out here to be away from the congestion. We moved from an area in another state that did this. It ruined the area and the city. Too much growth is not always a good thing. Stacey (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:00 AM
Nancy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Nancy (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:15 AM
I am here to express my extreme disappointment in the Innsbruck Farms development. I am strongly opposed to the building of 480+ homes in my area. I live on Ruggles Ferry and the traffic is already ridiculous. I moved here for the beauty and the country feeling it has and this will certainly destroy it. Once the commission sees these studies they will be able to see that the area cannot currently support and additional 4,500 to 5,000 additional trips by passenger cars, school busses, delivery vehicles, farm equipment and construction trucks. Please deny this application to overbuild a quiet, rural community. This is all about money and greed.Nancy (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:15 AM
John
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
John (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:52 AM
I am writing you today asking you to deny the Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan. This area is still a quiet countryside and all of us who live here value that lifestyle. This development will destroy our area. It will make it look like West or North Knoxville. Many of the people who have moved into this community are running to escape that style of living. Do what's right for the taxpayers who live here! DENY!!John (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:52 AM
Thomas
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Thomas (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:17 AM
I am opposed to the Innsbruck Farms project due to it's poorly planned lay out. You have a developer wanting to develop 200 acres that will negatively impact all of the property owners in the immediate area that own 6,000 acres. That is classic tail wagging the dog thinking. Not to mention the risk you put your citizens in by increased traffic and congestion. Please deny this project. Thomas (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:17 AM
Bo
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bo (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:18 AM
The MPC Commission needs to deny this concept plan. If you have not driven the Ruggles Ferry Community you need to before a decision is made. You can see first hand how this dense development will ruin our area.Bo (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:18 AM
Brad
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:30 AM
I strongly ask the Commission to look at what is proposed and deny the request for the Innsbruck Farms Subdivision. The changes offered by the developer are laughable and honestly insulting. Once again, the new proposal offers nothing new to improve the area. Nor does it offer any solution for traffic that will inundate Ruggles Ferry and other small county roads with cars. This development creates more problems than it does benefits to the area and has not been thought through very well. As a government entity it is your job to hear the voice of the community and figure out what is best, not listen to a handful seeking to gain a profit and move away from the community they are effecting.Brad (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:30 AM
Justin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:11 AM
See attached pdf.Justin (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:11 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707101152.pdf
Brad
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:15 AM
I ask that this plan be denied. It doesn’t fit with the rural character and the developer has not acted in good faith with the community. Brad (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:15 AM
Kathy
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kathy (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:18 AM
This large of a development will have a negative impact on the community. Significant traffic impact on a rural road that doesn’t even have a shoulder. Development should be consistent with the area it is to be located within. I strongly oppose & ask for denial of builders request as presented. Kathy (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:18 AM
Victoria
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Victoria (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:36 AM
I respectfully and earnestly ask you to vote no to this subdivision plan. Our quiet rural community with it's small country roads cannot handle this enormous development.Victoria (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:36 AM
kevin
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:25 AM
As a resident of the area where this development is proposed, I ask that this development not be approved in it's currently proposed plan. The housing density would be the highest in Knox County and seriously out of character with the surrounding area. It's a high-density island planted in a low-density (mostly farmland) area. It will more that triple by estimates the amount of traffic on Ruggles Ferry, not to mention the alternate access roads that were not even considered in the traffic study done.
The real estate, financing, and construction industries are well represented on the commission. What I am asking is that you put aside business relationships and try to look at this from the perspective of those of us who live in this area. We've invested a lot in the homes and land we have. Many of us escaped west Knoxville and this development will bring it to our doorstep. Listen to our voices.If you won't listen to us, listen to the Knoxville Board of Realtors which has given an opinion that this development is not needed in this area at this time.
Give us something we can live with. Give us the park the 2017 plan (https://archive.knoxplanning.org/plans/smallarea/east_county_2017.pdf) told us we would get. Don't give us 482 (or 480) homes surrounded by our low density neighborhood. kevin (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:25 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707112512.pdf
Julia
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Julia (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:26 AM
See attached letter.Julia (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:26 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707112632.pdf
Ashley
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ashley (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:34 AM
As a member of the community I ask that you deny this request. If you simply take a short drive down Ruggles Ferry you will see the signs of opposition. We as a community stand behind those who live on Ruggles Ferry that would be directly impacted. The deleterious effect of this build will spread throughout our small, rural area affecting our schools, roads and the safety of our community. I ask that you deny. Ashley (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:34 AM
Darrell
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Darrell (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM
I oppose this development due to the negative impact on our community infrastructure and resources. Darrell (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM
Tamera
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tamera (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:55 AM
I strongly oppose the current development plan of Innsbruck Farms. Please deny this request because it is the desire of the members of this community! Thank you!Tamera (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:55 AM
Tammie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tammie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:08 PM
Please deny the Innsbruck Development application. The area roads could not handle the large volume of traffic that would be generated with the proposed development and would have a negative impact in this community. Tammie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:08 PM
Catherine
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Catherine (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:10 PM
This proposed plan is not in the best interest of our community nor is it in alignment with the current infrastructure. The size and scope of this plan would over extend our schools, roadways, and is much larger than desired. There are other subdivisions within our community than can easily fulfill any housing needs that this plan would strive to meet. There is however an apparent need for homes of similar size and style to what is already in place in and around Ruggles Ferry. Catherine (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:10 PM
Trent
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Trent (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:25 PM
The Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan would be detrimental to the Ruggles Ferry/Carter area. 475 houses? The traffic increase, noise pollution to the residents in that immediate area, along with the fact that this huge increase in homes will greatly reduce the current rural living we so enjoy.PLEASE don't accept this plan!!!! While the housing market is in need for more homes, this is NOT the place to add them!Trent (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:25 PM
Amanda
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Amanda (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM
Please deny the approval of Innsbruck Farms subdivision. My family moved to Shackleford Lane in October. The country setting, wildlife and serenity were exactly what we were looking for. Adding the subdivision would take away the entire reason everyone in this area loves it. By adding the subdivision you will destroy the country setting and force wildlife to leave. Please do not turn this area into city living. Thank you!Amanda (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM
Christopher
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Christopher (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:30 PM
Please deny the approval for the Innsbruck Farms subdivision. By approving this, you will be destroying the reason the current residents love. The area is currently set up as a country setting, but this will turn the area into city living. Please say no to this subdivision. Thank you!Christopher (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:30 PM
Kylie
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kylie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 1:08 PM
I would like to oppose the recovery center in the Carter community. This is too close to the surrounding schools and there is no access to public transportation from this location. This is not a successful location for this facility. Kylie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 1:08 PM
3-SB-21-C
P (37871), July 7, 2021 at 1:39 PM
Please do Not allow this on Ruggles Ferry. This is Way Too Many houses in such a small space. It's not the subdivision that we are opposing, but the number of houses. The lots Have to be bigger!! Please do not approve thisP (37871), July 7, 2021 at 1:39 PM
TERESA
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
TERESA (37871), July 7, 2021 at 3:57 PM
I oppose this plan!! It negatively impacts the rural character of the community and there is no way that Ruggles Ferry Road can handle the traffic! The schools, grocery stores, restaurants, etc. are very limited in our area and are not capable of handling the influx of people and are at max capacity as it is. Please deny this plan!!!TERESA (37871), July 7, 2021 at 3:57 PM
Vicki
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Vicki (37871), July 7, 2021 at 4:05 PM
Innsbruck FARMS?!!! What a lie. There is nothing FARM about this other than the highest dollar yield possible from that 200 acres. This development would destroy the remaining family farms and change the beautiful face of the Ruggles Ferry community FOREVER. Don't let GREED govern! Don't let them turn east Knox county into another West Knoxville. PLEASE deny this plan.Vicki (37871), July 7, 2021 at 4:05 PM
Lee Ann
37871
37871
3-SB-21-C
Lee Ann (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:42 PM
I strongly oppose the approval of the Innsbruck Subdivision due to the high volume of traffic it will put on the main road which is Ruggles Ferry. We are looking at up to potentially 800-1,000 more cars per day traveling to and from work, and the road is extremely narrow and curvy. The connecting roads to Asheville Highway, (Burris, Cash, and Woodale), are also extremely narrow and have blind hills on at least two of the roads. Lee Ann (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:42 PM
I am also very concerned about the run-off into the Holston River from the subdivision. I do not want to destroy the natural beauty of the river, or the wildlife in and around the river. The dense population of the new subdivision will greatly affect the habitats of the wildlife in our area.
Finally, this subdivision is proposed as the largest subdivision in Knox County and will send a high volume of students to The Carter Middle and High school, Chilhowee school, and Sunnyview school. Overcrowding of schools is never considered when developments go in, and as a school teacher I see the results of poor planning first hand.
Please vote to "DENY" this proposed subdivision in our area.
Brittany
37871
37871
7-A-21-UR
Brittany (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:39 PM
I just wanted to say what a wonderful ministry Mike and Amanda Bartleson provide to the community with their Dog training facility, B&B K9 and their non profit, Paws and Badges. This truly is Mike's calling. He truly cares for all the dogs and their families. He has trained my dog and helped my family so much! Please please research what they do and hear them out. Please work with them so they can continue to minister to our wonderful community!Brittany (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:39 PM