July 11, 2024
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

74 Comments

X Date X ZIP Code

Margaret
37934

6-B-24-UR
Margaret (37934), June 1, 2024 at 7:38 AM

As an immediate neighbor of this proposed development, I am writing in opposition to the construction of an EZ Stop on Concord Road. This proposed location for a bustling gas station and restaurant is immediately adjacent a historic cemetery, still in use today with frequent new burials. The Village of Concord is a protected historic area, and encroachment into this area - particularly with an outlet on Second Drive immediately next to the cemetery, is an outrageous proposal. There are so few intact historical communities in this region, and all attempts should be made to preserve historic Concord as well as its surrounding infrastructure in the spirit of tranquility currently present. The increased traffic from this business will bleed over into the adjacent cemetery/place of rest in a way that is disrespectful to the dead, to the Masons next door, and to the neighbors adjacent to this property, like myself. I understand that development is inevitable, but every effort should be taken to be deliberate and intentional about the influx of traffic to the area and the noise pollution for the immediately adjacent historic cemetery.

June 1, 2024
at 7:38 AM

Belinda
37934

6-B-24-UR
Belinda (37934), June 2, 2024 at 7:10 PM

Please see attachment comment
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240602191004.pdf

June 2, 2024
at 7:10 PM

6-B-24-UR
Max (37934), June 3, 2024 at 11:51 AM

Greetings! We have: 1 - A sewage treatment plant across Concord - That makes noise. 2 - A main rail line close by - That makes noise 3 - A turn circle (turn-about) - That very often has “drifters” - Noise And now, 4 - A proposed gas station that will be located just across the property line, that will produce more noise pollution, as well as light pollution; all at the edge of a community on the Registry of Historical Places. Perhaps open 24 hours per day? Dentist office OK; this NO!

June 3, 2024
at 11:51 AM

Mark
37934

6-B-24-UR
Mark (37934), June 4, 2024 at 11:13 AM

See attachment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240604111317.pdf

June 4, 2024
at 11:13 AM

John
37934

6-B-24-UR
John (37934), June 4, 2024 at 1:29 PM

I live behind the Mason's Lodge and our family will be affected by the EZ Stop. I agree with all comments made already. I propose: (1) no drive-up speaker. (2) no alcohol sales. (3) a much smaller footprint. (4) no entrance on second Dr. The thing that bothers me is that no one is asking for this facility. We have Kroger for groceries and fuel, we have Wiegels for fuel and snacks plus a few cute restaurants in that area. It simply is not necessary.

June 4, 2024
at 1:29 PM

Carol
37934

6-B-24-UR
Carol (37934), June 5, 2024 at 12:51 PM

Please see the attached PDF message regarding Use on Review Case for 1025 Concord Rd.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240605125156.pdf

June 5, 2024
at 12:51 PM

Doug
37934

6-B-24-UR
Doug (37934), June 5, 2024 at 7:15 PM

In reference to the proposed EZ Stop fuel station, convenience store, and drive-thru restaurant being consider for 1025 Concord Road. I am completely against this! This is a residential area and makes zero sense to add a gas station! We already have gas stations at Kroger and Choto. This will create terrible traffic issues for everyone living in the immediate area but also for everyone trying to make their way to the round about. I strongly request that this proposal is rejected!

June 5, 2024
at 7:15 PM

Sharon
37934

6-B-24-UR
Sharon (37934), June 5, 2024 at 9:51 PM

The proposed building of a large, 24-hour food mart/gas station/restaurant is inappropriate for this site. As a resident of Old Concord, a neighborhood adjacent to this property, I am concerned about the added noise associated with clearing more of the land. It is noisy already, with the traffic on Concord Road, and the property is not deep enough to accommodate the building, gas pumps, etc. without clearing most of the existing trees that currently provide some sound barrier. Also, traffic is already a problem in this area, since the roundabout at Northshore and Concord Rd. is close to Second Street, the proposed entrance to this business. Second Street is very narrow, so that one car must pull over onto the side of the road while another passes. A hill obstructs the view when turning south onto Concord Rd, making that turn nearly impossible at busy times now. It can only get worse with the addition of this type of business at this location. In addition, the bright lighting associated with gas stations/food marts would affect some of the residents of my neighborhood, as the business will be very close by. I am not opposed to the growth of business along Concord Road: however the added noise, traffic issues, and bright lights all night long are not appropriate so close to a residential community.

June 5, 2024
at 9:51 PM

Laura
37934

6-B-24-UR
Laura (37934), June 5, 2024 at 10:12 PM

As a resident of the Historic Village of Concord, I oppose the EZ Stop development on Concord Road. I am very aware that this property will eventually be developed, but I feel that there are many other options that could be considered besides a large gas station and drive-thru restaurant. This development will be detrimental to the village behind this property. I have many concerns, but my main ones are losing all the tree buffers between the village and Concord Road, light and noise pollution from the gas station and drive-thru speaker, and traffic that will inevitably use our roads as a cut-through. We currently have a quiet, peaceful place to live and need the development of that land to fit and protect the historic nature of our village.

June 5, 2024
at 10:12 PM

jamie
37934

6-B-24-UR
jamie (37934), June 6, 2024 at 10:31 AM

Proposed site location is too close to Concord Rd./Northshore roundabout. Traffic in this area is already very congested with adding this new business.

June 6, 2024
at 10:31 AM

Stephanie
37934

6-B-24-UR
Stephanie (37934), June 6, 2024 at 6:36 PM

My husband and I just finished restoring our 1890 home in the Historic Concord Village and have been in the process of moving our family to our new home over the last few weeks. To say it's an honor to be able to become part of the Historic Concord community is an understatement, as we are beyond in love with our new community and have felt since the moment we purchased our home beyond grateful to be able to become part of an area that the Town of Farragut and Knoxville have made a priority to preserve. We agree that progress around the community will ultimately happen, but believe any development planned for needs to be accomplished in a style and sentiment that fits the area, which a gas station, such as an EZ Stop, does not. This plan will do nothing to uplift the community or area surrounding it, and will only detract from the history and charm that makes this area so special. We were so impressed by this area when we decided to make the move. If something like an EZ Stop can be moved further down the way, possibly closer to the grocery store of other developments by Kingston Pike, that would feel more fitting and appropriate for a development of that size and chain. Please help us keep this area beautiful, and keep Farragut beautiful. We urge the Knox Planning board members to please come by the area to see firsthand the impact this would have on the area, before making any decisions.

June 6, 2024
at 6:36 PM

Jonathan
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), June 6, 2024 at 9:48 PM

I am not against the development of Concord Rd. I am not against progress but do ask that developers are required to build/develop in ways that respect residents living in proximity. Thicker natural barriers, thoughtful design and layout to minimize pollution (noise, light, chemical, etc) and traffic patterns that all limit traffic exposure to residential areas nearby should be required.

June 6, 2024
at 9:48 PM

Florence
37934

6-B-24-UR
Florence (37934), June 7, 2024 at 12:17 PM

I am apposed to the EZ stop project on Concord road. My husband and I are resident since 1995. We raised our son in this community. I am French American and I appreciate the quaint village that reminds me of Europe. Fast food places and gas stations do not build a cultural identity. Knoxville has already erased so much of its past. It would be nice to keep some historical beauty and quiet around West Knoxville. We have a super center at Kroger and other places for fuel on North shore drive and Westland. I am also concerned about wildlife that is constantly displaced and crushed under cars, light pollution and such. Can we share a little with our wild neighbors? Foxes, rabbits, deer and other mammals live around the lake. This gas station will add nothing to our community, but noise, traffic and pollution. It will also degrade the historical feel of our small West Knoxville community. If you must build, then build a little park with native plants or invite a small restaurant owner to make something original and part of the community. I am thinking about the plaid apron in Sequoyah Hills that is a good example.

June 7, 2024
at 12:17 PM

Tommie
37934

6-B-24-UR
Tommie (37934), June 11, 2024 at 10:22 AM

Thank you for the opportunity to voice my concerns over the proposed EZ Stop. The scale of the EZ Stop is much too large for the surrounding area and especially for Concord. The roads in Concord are very narrow and it is already a challenge for two cars to pass much less a car and pick up truck on the narrow roads and the proposed project will greatly increase traffic and congestion in the area. The scale and nature of the EZStop does not fit with any other existing development in the area and would increase traffic on an already congested road that is prone to traffic back ups already. It is also a very unfortunate location because it will be directly in front of an active and historic cemetery. The noise and light pollution will be an unfortunate consequence if the EZ Stop is built. I hope this plan will be reconsidered and a more thoughtful and appropriate use of the land can be found.

June 11, 2024
at 10:22 AM

Jonathan
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), June 12, 2024 at 6:50 AM

I am opposed to this plan. My concerns is for the only historic neighborhood in the county. Removing the natural barriers would drastically alter the current protection we have from the heavy traffic on Concord Road. The light pollution from this project would make it harder to see the night sky, The noise from the proposed drive through would destroy the peacefulness you can experience while walking through the neighborhood or sitting on your front porch. The congestion at the entrances of the neighborhood would make it harder to get to and from our homes. It seems that the scope of this project is too large for the site and would leave little to no room for a good natural barrier between the progress of Farragut and our peaceful, historically protected neighborhood.
Separately I would like to speak a concern for all those that do not live in our neighborhood but have relatives buried in the historic cemetery that shares a direct border with this site. This is a very active cemetery and people have been buried there very recently. We lay wreaths for the veterans and people place flowers on graves. It would be shameful and maybe a little disrespectful to have to listen to someone ordering at a drive through while you are trying to visit a gravesite of someone you love.

June 12, 2024
at 6:50 AM

Abby
37934

6-B-24-UR
Abby (37934), June 12, 2024 at 1:34 PM

I am submitting a comment concerning the proposed development of the gas station on Concord Rd/Campbell Station. I am a resident of the Old Concord Historic district and my property abuts the cemetery that is directly behind the proposed development. I do not feel this development is appropriate for the area. The area is residential and there are many families with young children that ride their bikes and residents that walk for exercise along the roads of Old Concord directly off of Concord Rd. There are no sidewalks in the historic community. The large, busy would lead to increased traffic through the residential area creating a hazardous situation for pedestrians and children. Secondly, the noise problem from the increased traffic from the development and removal of trees would affect the community. The increased noise from Concord Rd is already noticeable between winter season (no leaves on trees) to summer (leaves on trees to buffer the noise). The removal of the trees and the increased traffic will elevate the traffic noise. The noise would diminish the peaceful atmosphere around the cemetery where families come to visit relatives on a regular basis. Thirdly, the light pollution from the gas station would be horrible due to same reasons of tree removal leading to glaring lights. I am opposed to this development and do not feel it is right for the area for the above reasons.

June 12, 2024
at 1:34 PM

Jeremy
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jeremy (37934), June 12, 2024 at 2:57 PM

Please see attached for my comments...
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240612145747.pdf

June 12, 2024
at 2:57 PM

Gary
37934

6-B-24-UR
Gary (37934), June 12, 2024 at 6:28 PM

see attachment
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240612182816.pdf

June 12, 2024
at 6:28 PM

Todd
37934

6-B-24-UR
Todd (37934), June 12, 2024 at 7:37 PM

I oppose the development (6-B-24-UR). As a nearby resident in historic Concord village, seems this development will negatively impact us and the recently installed & upgraded parks & greenways. I know this land is privately owned but if developed it should be done in a way that adds to our historic community and natural areas. I'm not convinced the area needs a fuel station. Every road into this area has a gas station, I count 10 within a 3-mile radius and 16 within 4 miles. In the last few weeks, when driving past the nearby Choto Weigle's, always less than 3 and multiple times not a single pump was in use. Those who know the history of the area are aware of remnants of the 3 shuttered gas stations within 500 yards of this location, it would be a shame if a 4th was added. Also seems like common sense not to put a restaurant a couple hundred yards from a sewage treatment plant. I don't think this is the right fit here. See attached for a full list of my concerns.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240612193732.pdf

June 12, 2024
at 7:37 PM

Scott
37934

6-B-24-UR
Scott (37934), June 17, 2024 at 10:53 AM

I fully support the local company EZ Stop getting the land to put in a nice convenient store with restaurant. We live close by and would be a great addition.

June 17, 2024
at 10:53 AM

Bailey
37934

6-B-24-UR
Bailey (37934), June 17, 2024 at 8:17 PM

I am a longtime resident of the Concord/Farragut area, and I heavily oppose the development listed for the EZ rest stop and restaurant. As a resident that has lived here for years and has helped out many times to clean and restore graves, the Masonic lodge, and other historical sites within the area, it is completely inappropriate to have such a development in the historic area of concord. The proposed site backs up directly upon the historic Masonic cemetery, which dates back to 1800 and houses many veterans. The site itself was once home to the old Concord church, which would have also been the site of pre-1800 burials. I’m not 100% confirming that there are burial sites on the land, but it is highly likely due to the history of the site/area around the site, as well as the history of Concord as a whole. I am not speaking for all residents, but to me, having a historical site such as this developed for a gas station (which isn’t needed in the area) is depressing. It would mean the permanent loss of an important site, as well as the potential permanent loss of history for the area.

June 17, 2024
at 8:17 PM

6-B-24-UR
Jon (37934), June 17, 2024 at 11:19 PM

I strongly oppose the development of a EZ Stop/Resuaraunt at Northshore and Concord, It's getting Ridiculous!

June 17, 2024
at 11:19 PM

Carol
37934

6-B-24-UR
Carol (37934), June 18, 2024 at 12:54 PM

The Village of Concord is the only historic village in Knox County and as such is a treasure. The home owners here, of which I am one, love the peace and quiet, their neighbors, and their ability to safely walk the streets with their dogs, or help their toddlers learn to ride their tricycles. Nearby neighborhoods enjoy our village too, and are welcome here. Adding an EastStop gas station is an insult to the village in many ways as has been amply explained in previous comments. Actually I can't see it making a profit as there are so many similar nearby facilities. For any productive use of the property on Concord Road we would welcome small, quiet businesses. In order to preserve the integrity of our peaceful village, beloved by everyone who knows it, we require a broad barrier of original tree growth between the Masonic cemetery, and all areas of the Historic Overlay, of 35 to 50 feet, no outlet onto Second Drive which is a narrow street and part of the overlay, and no noise, light, or toxic fume pollution.

June 18, 2024
at 12:54 PM

David
37934

6-B-24-UR
David (37934), June 18, 2024 at 1:27 PM

I am a member of the Old Concord Residents Association. There is an historic village ethos in Concord which we have had to defend multiples of times. It is the atmosphere of the place that is special. We all understand commercial development will happen on Concord Road. But the EZ Stop is encroaching on the village, even using one of our little streets, Second Drive, as ingress and egress. From what I can see, this development is similar to any Pilot station with a McDonald's or Wendy's attached to it. Lighting is a huge issue for us, as is noise. Also understand, that Second Drive is the only place we can safely exit onto Concord Road to Northshore. It is a very dangerous lefthand turn from Lakeridge. Everyone speeds entering or exiting the roundabout. There should be no use of Second Drive at all. Small retail and office spaces would be much safer than this high traffic project. It is my hope that EZ Stop will be respectful and responsive to our concerns.

June 18, 2024
at 1:27 PM

Carol
37934

6-B-24-UR
Carol (37934), June 18, 2024 at 3:06 PM

PDF document is attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240618150602.pdf

June 18, 2024
at 3:06 PM

Taylor
37934

6-B-24-UR
Taylor (37934), June 18, 2024 at 4:35 PM

Please see attachment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240618163505.pdf

June 18, 2024
at 4:35 PM

Melissa
37934

6-B-24-UR
Melissa (37934), June 18, 2024 at 6:09 PM

I’ve lived here since 1988, and am extremely unhappy about all the “building improvements” that are destroying the scenic, rural beauty and “small town” feel of the area. I strongly oppose this plan. It does not fit with the historic setting, and would increase the traffic congestion in the area.

June 18, 2024
at 6:09 PM

Shirley
37934

6-B-24-UR
Shirley (37934), June 18, 2024 at 7:55 PM

This proposed development joins the Concord Masonic Cemetery, and I feel this development as currently designed descecrates this historic cemetery which is the final resting place of many pioneer family members of the Concord/Farragut Community. This sacred cemetery must be protected from the encroachment of this unwise and unnecessary development. The only way to ensure the cemeteryâs protection is to deny this proposal. Please vote NO on this rezoning.

June 18, 2024
at 7:55 PM

6-B-24-UR
Eve (37934), June 18, 2024 at 8:26 PM

Our first church building from 1798 was demolished by federal troops then rebuilt as concord Presbyterian in 1877. In order to have ingress and egress to all church activities - our direct route is the one lane road known as second ave. Invading our access and inhibiting our ingress with drive through traffic from EZstop is inherently irresponsible development. More than that - it is disrespectful of normal enjoyment of our quaint village. We have no record of what unknown graves from the original church at Masonic Lodge may be savaged either. But please consider the veteran graves at Masonic lodge that are visible. We value those graves and do not want the families and veteran organizations to endure the disrespect you are proposing. Respect those living in Concord, those buried there and those worshiping there. Do the right thing towards a historic village!!!

June 18, 2024
at 8:26 PM

Bill
37934

6-B-24-UR
Bill (37934), June 19, 2024 at 11:15 AM

There are several large acre parcels between the Village of Concord and the newly widened Concord Road on the east side of the road. We understand that these parcels will be developed over time, so I am asking the planning commission to consider all of these starting with the current proposal from EZ Stop. This type of development, (ez stop), would be good for Kingston Pike or other more large scale commercial developed corridors But not for this more residential light commercial corridor. The Commission has the ability to control development and approving a large, 7K sf 24/7 gas station with a drive through, speakers, and lighting is inappropriate at best. The components of this proposal are incompatible with the surroundings especially Knox County's only Historic Overlay Zone mere feet away from the historic cemetery. My additional comments are submitted via attached pdf, thank you.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240619111513.pdf

June 19, 2024
at 11:15 AM

Anna
37934

6-B-24-UR
Anna (37934), June 19, 2024 at 9:23 PM

I am opposed to this development. See attached comments.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240619212302.pdf

June 19, 2024
at 9:23 PM

Stacey
37934

6-B-24-UR
Stacey (37934), June 19, 2024 at 9:56 PM

As a resident of Old Concord, I am very apprehensive about a large gas station located near the end of my neighborhood. My husband and I share a home at the end of Lake Ridge Drive. I moved here a little over two years ago. It is one of my favorite spots in Farragut because. It’s still has a lot of historic structures, which gives it a very small town feel. Adding a new gas station a little less than a block where an old abandoned gas station is located like a risky venture. It will be very hard to get in and out of the gas station with no traffic light and all the traffic coming off of the roundabout. We frequently take walks where we have to cross over Concord to get to the Greenway. It’s very hard to get across that street as there is no crosswalk. Adding a gas station which would likely increase the amount of traffic in that spot would make crossing even more dangerous and really devalue our neighborhood. A great part of our neighborhood charm is the fact that we are within walking distance to several parks and the Greenway. Adding this gas station will really detract from that.

June 19, 2024
at 9:56 PM

Melissa
37934

6-B-24-UR
Melissa (37934), June 20, 2024 at 6:15 AM

I have lived in Farragut since 1988. I am extremely unhappy and upset about all the “building improvements” that are removing the beautiful, rural landscape, destroying the unique “small town” feel, and replacing it with way too many “cookie cutter” or multi level buildings. I oppose this plan. It does not fit with the historic setting, and would increase the traffic congestion in the area.

June 20, 2024
at 6:15 AM

Robert
37934

6-B-24-UR
Robert (37934), June 20, 2024 at 8:35 AM

This project will ruin the historic charm of Concord. Upset the traffic patterns in a negative way for the area. It is just not comparable to the neighborhood.

June 20, 2024
at 8:35 AM

Melissa
37934

6-B-24-UR
Melissa (37934), June 20, 2024 at 12:52 PM

My main concern about the EZ Stop is that it doesnât add value to the community. Iâm not opposed to the area being developed, but Iâd like it to be something that respects the integrity and quaintness of the neighborhood. A coffee shop, boutique, cafe, or something quiet with minimal traffic. A gas station is very invasive for the residents. Itâs like putting it in the back of someoneâs neighborhood. Our kids canât ride their bikes. Itâs an extreme increase in noise and light pollution. This area has what most people want: the serenity of nature and the lake, while still being close to town. The proposed development is in complete disregard to the residents it most affects. It also poses a significant traffic danger to non-residents (and us). The area is really dangerous for drivers to access. If someone is traveling eastbound on Northshore and takes the roundabout to Concord Rd, they have to get over to the right lane. But thereâs a solid white no-pass lane to protect the westbound drivers turning onto Concord. Itâs a very dangerous and tricky spot, even for someone like me whoâs well-practiced. Sometimes I have to go all the way down to Loop just to turn to get to my own house cause itâs so busy. I donât want to Deter progress, and I know it is necessary. There just have to be better ideas than whatâs currently proposed.

June 20, 2024
at 12:52 PM

Daphne
37934

6-B-24-UR
Daphne (37934), June 20, 2024 at 4:54 PM

I've lived in farragut for almost 52 years now. It's unreal how Farragut at one point was farming land and now it's becoming worst than down town Knoxville. Farragut needs to keep it's historic buildings and lands alone. What history are we leaving behind? That Knoxville can move in and take over our history. Our homes and lands are our pride. My family are buried in the Mason cemetery and I know for a fack that they would not approve this change. They have already made concord look bad. Keep our history alive. Not just in pictures and paintings. I for one don't approve the change. And what happens to the wild life that we are disturbing because the rich want to get richer. I love the moon cemetery. I can set with my family and look over and see the lake and there is peace. No sounds of horns no smell of gas or lound unwanted sounds Just peaceful. Don't take our history and throw it away for another gas station we don't need. Keep Farragut clean and not over population with unwanted things.

June 20, 2024
at 4:54 PM

Scarlet
37934

6-B-24-UR
Scarlet (37934), June 21, 2024 at 5:46 AM

My husband and I bought our home in 2018, after he retired from the military. We selected Farragut for it's location and convenience to things we like to do. We also chose it because it was somewhat shielded from densely populated areas and crime. In our 6 years of living here there has been continuous growth and population increases. With NO change in infrastructure, to include security measures. When exactly will the Powers That Be in Farragut be satisfied with the growth.!? When Kingston Pike and Campbell Station look like the Bearden and Mall area? Please reconsider this development and future commercial development to preserve a small fraction of peace and tranquility in Farragut.

June 21, 2024
at 5:46 AM

Jonathan
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), June 21, 2024 at 6:43 AM

Please review the attached file to see comments on the oversized nature of this Ezstop project.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240621064345.pdf

June 21, 2024
at 6:43 AM

Ginger
37934

6-B-24-UR
Ginger (37934), June 21, 2024 at 8:30 AM

Developing a large convenience store/gas station at the end of Concord Rd. is incredibly short-sighted. The Northshore corridor is exploding with development, making the roundabout even less effective than it already is. The residents of Concord are being forgotten. If that area is to be developed for that kind of business, it should be a Weigels-sized station to minimize the impact of that area.

June 21, 2024
at 8:30 AM

Christina
37934

6-B-24-UR
Christina (37934), June 21, 2024 at 9:14 AM

I am against an EZ Mart gas/restaurant being built in that location. This is not the area for a business like this.

June 21, 2024
at 9:14 AM

Sarah
37934

6-B-24-UR
Sarah (37934), June 21, 2024 at 4:39 PM

I have lived in the Village of Old Concord for 48 years. The community has worked for decades to protect the history and atmosphere of this unique place. Old Concord is a coveted place to live and is well known in Knoxville for its unique atmosphere in the heart of Farragut. Overall our general feeling is that we don't want this particular development. If it does pass, we would like to see some alterations. These alterations have been presented by our community members in other posts. I am most concerned about traffic and noise and light pollution that will affect the entire atmosphere of our village. I am also concerned about the increase in traffic through the neighborhood that will affect the safety of our children. We are not unreasonable and know this land will eventually be developed but we're rooting for something smaller and more appropriate for our village and its residents.

June 21, 2024
at 4:39 PM

William
37934

6-B-24-UR
William (37934), June 21, 2024 at 5:48 PM

Our Historic Village of Concord was established in 1854. Knox County designated it a Historic District and placed it on the National Register of Historic Places in Knoxville to protect a part of our local history. Our community, a tightly woven tapestry of older and younger families, shares a common value of community, where our children and adults walk and ride bikes within our village, undisturbed by heavy traffic and noise. We take pride in our clean, litter-free streets and the tranquility that comes with limited noise.
The proposed EZ Go Gas Station will increase the traffic and threaten to unravel this way of life. We hope our County Administrators will act on our village's request and protect our families from high-traffic encroachment venues, such as fast food and gas stations. The increase in noise and light pollution will harm our peaceful village and forever alter how we currently enjoy our community. Our village is small and safe, with little outside traffic, and our children play outside with relative safety.
We have spoken with the Developer at a recent meeting at the Masonic Lodge in Concord; although the planning and preparations look nice, we know that this will bring a devastating change to our lives, all for the benefit of another gas station and fast food opportunity. Please deny this application for building an EZ Gas Station and fast food drive in our residential village.

June 21, 2024
at 5:48 PM

Audrey
37934

6-B-24-UR
Audrey (37934), June 21, 2024 at 7:52 PM

I may not be able to completely express my utter discontent and dissatisfaction with this proposal through this online format but I can certainly try. Starting with Old Concord is a historic neighborhood with homes dating back to the Civil War, it is a place worth protecting. This plan is an infringement on the above by bringing more traffic, more light pollution, and more noise to a neighborhood that is already experiencing those three things to a capacity I would describe as comfortable. Second, there is the concern of the above including the addition of fuel stores so close to Loudon Lake, three public parks and a local golf course While we hope nothing happens, the risk will exist. Third, in addition to the above, the proposed site backs up onto the cemetery of a Masonic Lodge, with gravestones as old as the early 20th century and plots still being used. No one wants to visit family members' final resting spots next to a 24-hour gas station that includes a drive-through restaurant. Fourthly, and finally, Old Concord Village and the surrounding neighborhoods have long been quaint and historical, this plan would break that untimely infringe greatly on a community with multiple churches, a neighborhood that has long been ideal for raising children, and a village with multiple generations of families. I cannot stress enough how much I oppose this development.

June 21, 2024
at 7:52 PM

William
37934

6-B-24-UR
William (37934), June 22, 2024 at 11:15 AM

Our Historic Village of Concord was established in 1854. Knox County designated it a Historic District and placed it on the National Register of Historic Places in Knoxville to protect a part of our local history. Our community, a tightly woven tapestry of older and younger families, shares a common value of community, where our children and adults walk and ride bikes within our village, undisturbed by heavy traffic and noise. We take pride in our clean, litter-free streets and the tranquility that comes with limited noise. The proposed EZ Go Gas Station will increase the traffic and threaten to unravel this way of life. We hope our County Administrators will act on our village's request and protect our families from high-traffic encroachment venues, such as fast food and gas stations. The increase in noise and light pollution will harm our peaceful village and forever alter how we currently enjoy our community. Our village is small and safe, with little outside traffic, and our children play outside with relative safety. We have spoken with the Developer at a recent meeting at the Masonic Lodge in Concord; although the planning and preparations look nice, we know that this will bring a devastating change to our lives, all for the benefit of another gas station and fast food opportunity. Please deny this application for building an EZ Gas Station and fast food drive in our residential village.

June 22, 2024
at 11:15 AM

Peyton
37934

6-B-24-UR
Peyton (37934), June 23, 2024 at 11:10 AM

Please reject that proposal to build a large gas station on Concord Road where it is not needed, will create problems in the flow of traffic, and will damage the quality of life in a residential area.

June 23, 2024
at 11:10 AM

6-B-24-UR
JON (37934), June 24, 2024 at 7:39 AM

Please see the attached file regarding the "use as a drive through" and the failure of this plan to be in harmony with Article 4 section 2 4.10.17. The use will not significantly injure the value of adjacent property by noise, lights, fumes, odors, vibration, traffic congestion or other impacts which may detract from the immediate environment. The proposed landscaping would in this case would fail to prevent harmful impacts to the adjacent properties.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240624073957.pdf

June 24, 2024
at 7:39 AM

Mary Anne
37934

6-B-24-UR
Mary Anne (37934), June 24, 2024 at 9:08 AM

A gas station being built on Concord rode is a terrible idea. The proposed site is too close to the round about. We have a gas station at Kroger. It will put too much traffic and poses a danger due to people pulling out from the gas station.

June 24, 2024
at 9:08 AM

Nancy
37934

6-B-24-UR
Nancy (37934), June 24, 2024 at 4:15 PM

see attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240624161549.pdf

June 24, 2024
at 4:15 PM

6-B-24-UR
JON (37934), June 25, 2024 at 6:20 AM

Please review the attached USDA information on using agroforestry to buffer noise. All of the information is relevant but buffer density is most relevant to this case. As there is specific guidelines that state the proposed 25 foot setback of natural barrier. "A single row of trees will not provide noticeable noise reduction. At best they will provide a visual screen between residents and the noise source." "The noise buffer must completely block the line of sight. If any light can be seen through the buffer, it is providing no appreciable noise reduction. When only trees and shrubs are used for the buffer, this means the planting must be at least 100 feet wide with evergreen species for year around reduction. Even with wide and dense vegetative buffers noise reduction above 3 to 5 dBA is not likely." EzStop should consider increasing their 25 foot set back to 100 feet along the back of the property that faces residents and the cemetary. This will achieve at a 3-5dBA in noise reduction from the drive through and offer protection to the historic village behind the property.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240625062056.pdf

June 25, 2024
at 6:20 AM

Carol
37934

6-B-24-UR
Carol (37934), June 25, 2024 at 3:29 PM

This proposed large, noisy, brightly lit, busy gas station project is totally inappropriate for our peaceful, unique, historic village. Concord is worth preserving just the way it is. Also 18 wheeler trucks will be diverted to drive through our narrow quiet streets. I am horrified it has been given a possible go ahead by the planning commission. The drive through restaurant line is directly next to the regularly used Masonic Cemetery. I thought almost all of you were Christian in this county - where is your respect?

June 25, 2024
at 3:29 PM

Brenda
37934

6-B-24-UR
Brenda (37934), June 25, 2024 at 7:25 PM

As someone who doesn't even live near the proposed development site, this seems like a very bad idea. I oppose this EZ Rest Stop. Why? For many reasons:

-It will bring so much more traffic to Concord. After looking through the developer's traffic study, the data doesn't seem to take into account how large developments like this will bring in more cars and traffic. It's inevitable. The traffic study seems very sketchy and skewed (coming from a professional data analyst).

-The site backs up on protected land, and, if unmarked burials are found, it WILL BE protected land. Seems like these people don't really care about others, do they? All they care about is how the money talks

-The site backs up on people's neighborhoods and homes! How invasive

-Last time I checked laws, 7000sqft is much more than 5000sqft

-No matter what, once the "new" wears off of the EZ Rest Stop, it will eventually sit empty or get sold to another chain corporation.

June 25, 2024
at 7:25 PM

Jonathan
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), June 27, 2024 at 7:44 AM

Please review attached comments on building size.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240627074429.pdf

June 27, 2024
at 7:44 AM

Belinda
37934

6-B-24-UR
Belinda (37934), June 27, 2024 at 1:40 PM

As of 6/27/24, an on-line petition has garnered 502 signatures and growing from 37934 zip code and surrounding neighborhoods opposing this development. Please listen to the community and oppose this proposal. It is not the right fit for the traffic and the cultural character of the only remaining historic community in Knox county. https://chng.it/NyrS47WSJk

June 27, 2024
at 1:40 PM

George
37934

6-B-24-UR
George (37934), June 27, 2024 at 2:48 PM

This land will be developed, but it will only be supported by local residents if it's compatible with their area and cultural needs. This area does have a tight knit group of people that don't tend to be transient. Develop this land that will serve a useful purpose, and have longevity. Then it will be successful. Any investment into a business with a gas station plus food, in my opinion, is doomed to fail. Just up the road is a new shopping area about to open, with a variety of restaurants and stores. Residents travelling up North Shore to the affluent residential areas, I can assure you will not stop on the way home from work and get takeout from a gas station business. That's a laughable idea. I cannot believe the evident lack of diligence. Rezone within the law, but make it a compatible venture, not this silly idea.

June 27, 2024
at 2:48 PM

Jeffrey
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jeffrey (37934), June 27, 2024 at 5:12 PM

I am strongly opposed to this project. It is counter to the nature and esthetic of the area, and there are real environmental impact concerns. This is not even to mention the traffic issues. A grocery/gas station may be needed by the metrics of the developer, but the community is saying no. I ask that this goes unapproved.

June 27, 2024
at 5:12 PM

Lazaro
37934

6-B-24-UR
Lazaro (37934), June 27, 2024 at 6:07 PM

The experiment of a gas station/convenience/food shop on this stretch of Concord Road has been tried in the past and failed. There was a little sandwich shop that once had gas pumps at 1116 Concord Road which is right across Second Street from the proposed location of this EZ Stop. That shop was failed and is now an eyesore to our community. I am not against development per se but it should be fitting with the area and benefit the residents of said area. The EZ Stop plans are not in line with the community of Old Concord. There are no architectural cues from our community the plans for the building look like every other gas station in town. What accommodations will EZ Stop provide to our community for the additional traffic they will drive through our area. Especially in regards to safety concerns. One of the ideas from our community leaders was making the exit onto Second Street from the EZ Stop right turn only. That idea looks to have already been shot down. If they were interested in partnering with our community they would listen to the input of our community leaders and agree to the requested remediations. Or even better come up with solutions that would serve our community on their own. Like addressing the added traffic on Concord Road that will make it more difficult for our community to walk across the road to access the greenway by building a pedestrian bridge. This development as it stands does not make sense for Old Concord or our surrounding community.

June 27, 2024
at 6:07 PM

Sean
37934

6-B-24-UR
Sean (37934), June 27, 2024 at 8:24 PM

This project is inappropriate and I believe illegal to approve. Putting a gas station in a residential area is not appropriate. I also believe this falls under spot zoning, which is illegal. You also potentially get into issues where you create issues for existing neighbors. If this has lighting after dark, you are radically changing the surrounding property's use. This would be illegal. Kingston Pike is a more appropriate location for something like this.

June 27, 2024
at 8:24 PM

Megan
37934

6-B-24-UR
Megan (37934), July 1, 2024 at 11:49 AM

Message attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240701114913.pdf

July 1, 2024
at 11:49 AM

Bill
37934

6-B-24-UR
Bill (37934), July 6, 2024 at 11:07 AM

Please deny this application for the EZ Stop gas station on Concord Road. If that is not going to happen, ask the developers to redesign the floor plan to reduce the size to the maximum of 5K SF permitted per the zoning. A firewall simply defeats the intentions of the zoning designation. There is another adjacent lot that they are not willing to use for this gas facility but is in the same option on the property the gas station is located on. It seems that their development finances depend on being able to develop the side lot into an income stream. This shouldn't be forced on the community just to make a profit. The gas station could be broken up into two separate buildings and moved forward towards Concord Road and increase the rear buffer of trees to 75 feet as well as 75 feet for the buffer between this development and Second Drive and maybe spread it out enough to have ingress and egress only on Concord Road and not on Second. The issue is not only left turns into the neighborhood, but folks cutting through from Woody and Loop roads late at night and then tossing trash out in the neighborhood. We already pick up large amounts of beer cans that folks don't want to get caught with late at night. thank you for your consideration and please deny this project, it's not appropriate for this area..

July 6, 2024
at 11:07 AM

Gary
37934

6-B-24-UR
Gary (37934), July 6, 2024 at 4:50 PM

The previously posted comments regarding the sink hole that underlies the proposed gas station site (see comments of June 21, 2024) must be submitted to the Knox County permitting department and Tennessee Department of Evironment and Conservation. This is a serious situation that could affect Loudon Lake water quality that services the First Utility District service area. Building over a sink hole is not a permitted activity as stated by the Knoxville County Permitting Department. Consequently, no building permit or water discharge permit should be issued to the EZ stop gas station company.

July 6, 2024
at 4:50 PM

Wilfred
37934

6-B-24-UR
Wilfred (37934), July 6, 2024 at 7:43 PM

As I understand it, this is a pending convenience store development of a lot in the Concord area near the roundabout with Northshore Drive. As a resident in this area, I cannot think of a worse or more unnecessary use of property along that thoroughfare. There are numerous gasoline and grocery options already available within a mile of this location (the Kroger center and other options on Kingston Pike, for example). Safety considerations are also an issue in that location. A development of this nature would upset this peaceful residential area.

July 6, 2024
at 7:43 PM

Tammy
37934

6-B-24-UR
Tammy (37934), July 7, 2024 at 8:52 PM

See attached PDF
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240707205207.pdf

July 7, 2024
at 8:52 PM

Belinda
37934

6-B-24-UR
Belinda (37934), July 8, 2024 at 7:32 PM

As of 7/8/24, there are 660 signatures for our online petition from Change.org opposing the development - https://chng.it/chmpw7cJJv. (see attachment). In addition, a door-to-door petition taken within 2-3 miles of proposed development has signatures of over 530 neighbors opposed to this development - see attached list. Please listen to the residents surrounding this development site and vote NO.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240708193218.pdf

July 8, 2024
at 7:32 PM

Peter
37934

6-B-24-UR
Peter (37934), July 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM

Please find my brief comments, in opposition to this project, attached.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240708215104.pdf

July 8, 2024
at 9:51 PM

6-B-24-UR
Jon (37934), July 9, 2024 at 8:42 AM

Please see comments on how the IBC and zoning codes have completely different purposes and using the IBC to justify breaking zoning code is inappropriate in this case. Using the IBC consideration of "separate building," which is intended for the purpose of calculating limits based on occupancy classifications and construction type, clearly circumvents the purpose and intent of the Knox County zoning regulations in regards to building size limitations within a CN zone.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240709084239.pdf

July 9, 2024
at 8:42 AM

Todd
37934

6-B-24-UR
Todd (37934), July 9, 2024 at 9:17 PM

I strongly encourage the planning commission to deny the "use permitted on review" due to the failure for the proposed use to meet the requirements adopted in the Knox County Code of Ordinances. A denial decision as set forth in Appendix A Zoning, article 4 and article 6, is allowed and strongly supported because of, but not limited to, the following reasons:
1 The use is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning regulations; and
2 The use is inconsistent with adopted plans and policies, including the general plan and the sector plans; and
3 The use is incompatible with the character of the neighborhood where it is proposed, and with the size and locations of buildings in the vicinity; and
4 The use will significantly injure the value of adjacent property by noise, lights, fumes, odors, vibration, traffic congestion or other impacts which may detract from the immediate environment; and
5 The use is of a nature and so located as to draw substantial additional traffic through residential streets; and
6 The nature of development in the surrounding area is such as to pose a potential hazard to the proposed use and create an undesirable environment for the proposed use.
Attached is a detailed writeup with backup for each of the above concerns.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240709211756.pdf

July 9, 2024
at 9:17 PM

6-B-24-UR
Eve (37934), July 9, 2024 at 10:36 PM

After reading the attempt to cancel the recommendations which would assure the normal enjoyment and preservation of Concord village - one thing stands out. The repeated phrase of interference from traffic, noise, and unsightliness is unproven fear. If half of the traffic they have clocked themselves we're to turn in second St- It would be detrimental to concord AND ez stop customers. That is fact - not fear. They have clocked in excess of 15,000 cars per day. That's 15,000 cars per day who currently have no reason to enter into second st Ez stop is trying to create a venue to bring them, their noise, their litter and their emissions to daily life in a historic district They are in effect confirming our fears by wanting to capture the excess of 15,000 cars per day. They can make a profit by accommodating what they oppose. They can do everything proposed so our fear of 15,000 cars a day won't harm a historic village Local businesses should care the most about accommodating the integrity of historic places. That's why they are designated for this deference

July 9, 2024
at 10:36 PM

Melissa
37934

6-B-24-UR
Melissa (37934), July 10, 2024 at 9:38 AM

Please explain to me how the size limit for a development on a CN lot is 5,000 sq ft and this proposed building is now 7,715 sq ft?! This is massive and ridiculous and completely against the policies that are in place to protect this community and preserve its integrity. This is WRONG and insulting.

July 10, 2024
at 9:38 AM

Leigh
37934

6-B-24-UR
Leigh (37934), July 10, 2024 at 10:47 AM

Please do not consider this development for this area. It does not fit with the surrounding neighborhoods and would considerably change the character of the area. This is not the progress we need. This type of development needs to stay along the Kingston Pike corridor and away from Historic Concord. The residents deserve better.

July 10, 2024
at 10:47 AM

Jonathan
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), July 10, 2024 at 11:41 AM

Please see the attached document with comments that support the limiting the number of pumps for this fueling station.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240710114122.pdf

July 10, 2024
at 11:41 AM

Jonathan
37934

6-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), July 10, 2024 at 12:16 PM

Additional request for recommendations due to the intensity level of having 3 separate uses on reviews in one establishment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240710121657.pdf

July 10, 2024
at 12:16 PM

Mark
37934

6-B-24-UR
Mark (37934), July 10, 2024 at 12:42 PM

Legal counsel for applicant is quoted as saying "I can tell you nobody's property values go down when something like this comes in" in the 6/26 issue of the Farragutpress. Is this value opinion supported by a professional appraiser? There are several homes in a historical district within 200-300 feet of the large proposed improvement.

July 10, 2024
at 12:42 PM

Greg
37934

6-B-24-UR
Greg (37934), July 10, 2024 at 1:07 PM

Complete disgust in this matter. No need for a convenient store/etc in this location. This is an historical site. We finally received side walks for walkers, runners, and bikers. We don't need anymore red lights. Please keep this place sacred for the people whom helped build it and turn down the all mighty dollar, that's what it's all about.

July 10, 2024
at 1:07 PM

Karen
37934

6-B-24-UR
Karen (37934), July 10, 2024 at 5:13 PM

Why does Farragut want to develop every area. This is not necessary. When I die I will be buried in the cemetery behind that development! Did you know that streets to the left is historic Concord? Do you care?

July 10, 2024
at 5:13 PM