November 12, 2026
Planning Commission meeting
Planning Commission meeting
Public Comments
146 Comments for
Mackenzie
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
Mackenzie (37922), October 13, 2026 at 9:29 AM
Mourfield and Blue Grass road already have horrible traffic and congestion. Adding anything to the grass fields is going to cause nothing but chaos and even worse air quality in the area. Leave Knoxville with some green lots i promise not everything has to be concrete! Mackenzie (37922), October 13, 2026 at 9:29 AM
Holly
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
Holly (37922), October 15, 2026 at 5:27 PM
I respectfully ask that any zone changes include a provision for construction of a sidewalk and road buffer as a condition. That area is constrained by a narrow intersection that would be dangerous with additional cars. Please put in the proper safety boundaries that make sure everyone gets home each night. Holly (37922), October 15, 2026 at 5:27 PM
Roy
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
Roy (37922), October 20, 2026 at 11:08 AM
Best case : zone agriculture and sell as farm.Roy (37922), October 20, 2026 at 11:08 AM
Next best case : Single family housing.
Shermans Meadow
Kimberly
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
Kimberly (37922), October 20, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Since moving here in 2019 I have seen the traffic triple on Bluegrass and have ended up with several cars in my yard from accidents. This road was not built to withstand this type of traffic . Stop over developing everything. We need sidewalks, roads without harsh drop offs and better plans before we just over build an already over developed area. Kimberly (37922), October 20, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Chris
37922
37922
11-A-26-DP
Chris (37922), October 21, 2026 at 6:45 PM
I write to provide public comment on the variance waiver request submitted by Reginald Bell for the property located at 9315 Sway Branch Lane located in the Williford Subdivision of West Knoxville.Chris (37922), October 21, 2026 at 6:45 PM
As a current homeowner in the neighborhood I am adamantly opposed to the granting of this waiver. I would be of the opinion that when developed, this plot was never intended for a home build. This seems to be true for several other properties in the subdivision that do not currently occupy a home . As an example, just several properties to the south of this location, a developers attempt to build outside the scope of required code and circumvent the policies set forth by our county, led to drainage and stability issues of properties above and adjacent to it. Allowing for a waiver to this zoning variance as submitted may lead to similar issues with neighboring properties. It seems foolish to allow for something that has already been proven to be unsuccessful. Additionally, any allowance for a build, and/or waiver to current requirements would likely lead to the unnecessary removal and destruction of what is left of the natural resources, wildlife, and beauty that exists within this area.
It is for these reasons that I respectfully submit my opposition to the referenced request and ask for your boards denial of such.
Tom
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
Tom (37922), October 22, 2026 at 8:29 AM
Commercial zoning in this area of residential and agricultural use will be completely inappropriate. The roads are narrow and have several blind hills.Commercial development in this area will negatively affect property values.The increased road use by commercial type vehicles will also be dangerous for current residents.Tom (37922), October 22, 2026 at 8:29 AM
amanda
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
amanda (37922), October 22, 2026 at 7:07 PM
I am an adjoining property owner concerned about the proposed rezoning at 8664 S. Northshore Drive (11-N-26-RZ).amanda (37922), October 22, 2026 at 7:07 PM
My family has lived here for 16 years. Our property sits downhill from the proposed development and has experienced significant flooding, requiring extensive drainage improvements.
There have also been numerous serious crashes directly in front of this property. During peak hours, we regularly wait 8-10 minutes just to exit our driveway safely. Adding substantial residential traffic to this already dangerous stretch of Northshore is deeply concerning.
I respectfully request a lower residential density, comprehensive traffic and drainage studies, and appropriate buffers along neighboring properties.
I recognize the owner's right to develop their land, but please consider this decision as if your own children and grandchildren were pulling onto this road every day.
Thank you for your consideration.
Amanda S.
George
37922
37922
11-B-26-PA
George (37922), October 26, 2026 at 4:21 PM
The mystery that is zoning designations makes it hard to understand what's being requested or planned for this property in the heart of a purely single-family home residential area. George (37922), October 26, 2026 at 4:21 PM
The request says Suburban Mixed Residential. When I looked it up, it said this: "Housing Types: Permits a mix of residential designs, including single-family detached homes, townhomes, and house-scale multifamily developments.
Density: Generally allows Planned Residential (PR) zoning densities up to 12 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), depending on topography and infrastructure capacity."
Furthermore, a side-by-side request is apparently for commercial development to be allowed via the rezoning.
This rezoning is wholly incompatible with the surrounding single-family home area. Bluegrass Road is a small country road. If planning commission staff or board members lived adjacent or near this property, it's doubtful they'd like the requested rezoning.
Single-family homes, yes. Changing the nature of the entire area, no.
Courtney
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Courtney (37922), October 27, 2026 at 1:08 PM
Northshore extending from Lyons View/Lakeshore all the way to Pellissippi and beyond is already overcrowded and dangerous. There are backups, wrecks, and traffic delays constantly. Not to mention concern for flooding in the specific area being addressed in this rezoning. Please protect the safety (and sanity) of all of the residents already living in this area and protect this property from further overcrowding.Courtney (37922), October 27, 2026 at 1:08 PM
Clayton
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Clayton (37922), October 27, 2026 at 2:58 PM
I live in Kensington and I oppose 11-D-26-PA and 11-N-26-RZ (agenda item 35).Clayton (37922), October 27, 2026 at 2:58 PM
The densest development anywhere close by is my neighborhood, and this request is far denser. I live inside my neighborhood with 6 acres on a parcel behind me, and the fact that my neighbors are not leaning over my yard is a reason I was drawn to the area. The land is surrounded by single homes on very large lots. This change is not in keeping with the character of the area.
The land is designated Rural Conservation and Stream Protection now, and that is how it was purchased. Buying two homes surrounded by large lots does not give a developer a right to a spot rezoning.
It appears to me that a somewhat significant portion of the land is in the FEMA Zone AE floodplain. Runoff from a development at this level could create downstream problems. S Northshore Dr is two lanes here, and over a hundred new homes would load onto it. I ask that at a minimum a traffic study and a drainage study be conducted.
Something like 10 to 12 homes would draw little opposition from the neighborhood. There are no sidewalks, and this development is not walkable to anywhere in terms of jobs. When I ran for office I was accused of being too pro development, and I am in fact pro development when it is done in a wise and responsible manner. Buying two houses to put up 100 plus new ones on a 2 lane road next to old farms is absolutely not it.
Clayton W.
Joseph
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Joseph (37922), October 28, 2026 at 8:18 PM
To think Northshore can handle additional homes or traffic is absurd. To get anywhere on Northshore during regular hours is bad enough but between the hours 7:00-8:00am and 4:00-6:00pm is terrible. When accidents occur, which they do, it shuts the whole street down which can be dangerous for emergency vehicles.Joseph (37922), October 28, 2026 at 8:18 PM
Please consider how this would forever negatively impact the daily lives of the community.
Jennifer
37922
37922
11-A-26-PA
Jennifer (37922), October 29, 2026 at 1:56 PM
I'm providing comment to protest the rezoning of 1608 Maplegreen Ln/ Parcel ID 154 042 to a Neighborhood Commercial zone. Please see attached letter for my comments. I implore you to please vote no on this zoning request.Jennifer (37922), October 29, 2026 at 1:56 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261029135641.pdf
David
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
David (37922), November 2, 2026 at 12:39 PM
I am opposed to this due to traffic concerns.David (37922), November 2, 2026 at 12:39 PM
Making a left hand turn on to Northshore during morning and evening rush hour is already dangerous, especially Northshore between Morrell and Tooles Bend.
Traffic backs up in the right turn lane and even if someone is nice enough to let you in to turn left, it is very difficult to see on coming traffic.
Adding traffic associated with high density housing in this area is going to result in more accidents.
Gregory
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Gregory (37922), November 2, 2026 at 1:19 PM
S NorthshoreDrive is too busy as it is to support high density residential. Please consider existing residents safety.Gregory (37922), November 2, 2026 at 1:19 PM
Beth
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Beth (37922), November 2, 2026 at 1:30 PM
In regard to the proposed rezoning of this land: this property is a needed to serve an important role in flood mitigation and control in an area of Northshore that is prone to flooding. Removal of all naturally occurring (trees, grass, natural stream) land forms will harm the infrastructure currently in place (roads, drainage on the opposite side of the road, etc).Beth (37922), November 2, 2026 at 1:30 PM
Lauren
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Lauren (37922), November 2, 2026 at 1:50 PM
I strongly oppose rezoning this property from Rural Conservation/Stream Protection to Suburban Residential at a density of 12 units per acre.Lauren (37922), November 2, 2026 at 1:50 PM
This land is needed as an environmental buffer and for natural flood control. Northshore has a history of flooding that has resulted in school and business closures and creates serious safety concerns during flash-flood events. Increasing development and impervious surfaces could worsen stormwater runoff and flooding.
The existing infrastructure also does not appear adequate to support this level of density. Northshore already experiences significant traffic congestion, accidents, and safety concerns. Adding substantial residential development without improvements to roads, drainage, intersections, and emergency access will further strain the community.
Please deny this rezoning request and preserve the current Rural Conservation/Stream Protection designation to protect the safety and long-term sustainability of the Northshore community.
Amy
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Amy (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:04 PM
The current infrastructure cannot handle another high density subdivision in this location. Traffic conditions and the number of accidents on this area of Northshore are already out of hand. Please look into this and reconsider.Amy (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:04 PM
Courtney
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Courtney (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:16 PM
Infrastructure is not in place to support these residences. Accidents, including fatalities, are already prevalent. Roads cannot sustain current traffic. Courtney (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:16 PM
The landed is needed for purposes it is already zoned for- an environmental buffer and flood zone control.
Lori
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Lori (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:43 PM
I'm a resident near the location of the proposed zoning changes and would like to respectfully voice my opposition. My backyard abuts Northshore Drive, allowing us to see firsthand the frequent high volume of traffic and emergency vehicle passage, heavy congestion any time there is utility or mowing work, and unfortunately regular accidents/collisions. As others have mentioned, turning out onto Northshore Drive often takes several minutes, as Northshore drive is only two lanes and windy. The Northshore Drive Corridor Study completed in 2021 found "nearly all of Northshore Drive has a segment crash rate higher than the average when compared to similar facilities across the state." All of these factors contribute to it being a poor location for high density housing. The stretch of Northshore Drive in question was planned with the understanding of rural zoning, and it's hard to imagine forcing potentially 100+ dwellings onto the already taxed corridor.Lori (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:43 PM
The other concern I have is how the proposed rezoning would impact the wildlife and natural beauty of mature trees and the overall character of this more rural area within Knox County. Thank you for considering these objections.
Lori
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Lori (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:43 PM
I'm a resident near the location of the proposed zoning changes and would like to respectfully voice my opposition. My backyard abuts Northshore Drive, allowing us to see firsthand the frequent high volume of traffic and emergency vehicle passage, heavy congestion any time there is utility or mowing work, and unfortunately regular accidents/collisions. As others have mentioned, turning out onto Northshore Drive often takes several minutes, as Northshore drive is only two lanes and windy. The Northshore Drive Corridor Study completed in 2021 found "nearly all of Northshore Drive has a segment crash rate higher than the average when compared to similar facilities across the state." All of these factors contribute to it being a poor location for high density housing. The stretch of Northshore Drive in question was planned with the understanding of rural zoning, and it's hard to imagine forcing potentially 100+ dwellings onto the already taxed corridor.Lori (37922), November 2, 2026 at 2:43 PM
The other concern I have is how the proposed rezoning would impact the wildlife and natural beauty of mature trees and the overall character of this more rural area within Knox County. Thank you for considering these objections.
Wes
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Wes (37922), November 2, 2026 at 3:50 PM
This cannot happen. Traffic is already terrible at high-demand times and this will only make things worse. Northshore already needs more lanes; to consider adding high-density housing - and thus the corresponding traffic - is absolutely ridiculous. Hell no!Wes (37922), November 2, 2026 at 3:50 PM
Laura
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Laura (37922), November 2, 2026 at 4:28 PM
Please think long and hard before passing this to be such condensed housing. Northshore has been getting so congested and not only during just early morning with people getting to work and school. Also, with the flooding that has occurred there, studies need to be done to make sure this is not going to be a very dangerous area for drivers. I can't imagine that a builder would not be worried about these things. May need to think about making Northshore safer first.Laura (37922), November 2, 2026 at 4:28 PM
Lee
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Lee (37922), November 2, 2026 at 9:40 PM
I oppose both 11-D-26-PA and 11-N-26-RZ. I do not oppose development but the surrounding area is almost exclusively single family residential with zoning densities ranging between 3-5 dwelling units per acre. Allowiing this parcel a density that is 2.5 to 4 times more than surrounding developments and altering the character of the area with attached housing would be irresponsible of our Knox County govenerment. Let the developer develop the tract like other parcels in this section of Northshore Drive and at a similar density to its neighbors. Any additional traffic burden placed on this section of Northshore would also be problematic as traffic volume have increased significantly in recent years. Lee (37922), November 2, 2026 at 9:40 PM
Josh
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Josh (37922), November 2, 2026 at 9:45 PM
See attached. Josh (37922), November 2, 2026 at 9:45 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261102214500.pdf
Julie
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Julie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 12:45 PM
This land is needed as an environmental buffer and flood zone control. There is no infrastructure for this as there are already significant traffic issues and accidents are already too prevalent. The developer hasn't even met with the neighbors.Julie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 12:45 PM
Steve
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Steve (37922), November 3, 2026 at 12:47 PM
1. Looking on KGIS, it appears approximately 20% of the land of the two parcels are covered by the 500 yard flood zone, and part of even the 100 year flood zoom butts right up to Northshore Dr.Steve (37922), November 3, 2026 at 12:47 PM
It would seem that adding all that impermeable surface for the units and parking would dramatically increase the chance of Northshore Dr. flooding on a regular basis.
Since Northshore Dr. is a major east west artery, it would be unreasonable for the County to risk cutting cut off access to thousands of households every time we have a heavy rain.
2. PC should not consider an increase in density in the remaining land (e.g., "in exchange" for the unuseable flood zone area).
3. PC should not consider reducing parking requirements as a way of solving the problem, and in fact PC should require the developer to use PICP pavers with 40% permeation for all parking areas, sidewalks, and access roadways over the 500 year flood zone. Roof runoff should also be buffered locally.
Julie
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Julie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM
I strongly oppose the proposed multi-unit development across from our neighborhood. The road is already heavily traveled, and there are multiple accidents in this area every year. Adding a significant number of residential units will only increase traffic, congestion, and the potential for serious accidents, creating additional safety concerns for both residents and commuters.Julie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Beyond traffic, this development raises concerns about the strain on existing infrastructure, emergency access, stormwater drainage, and the overall character of the surrounding community. A development of this size and density is simply not appropriate for this location. Growth and development should be thoughtful and responsible, taking into consideration the safety, quality of life, and long-term interests of the people who already live here.
We are not opposed to progress, but we are opposed to development that creates unnecessary safety risks and negatively impacts an established neighborhood.
Julie
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Julie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Adding apartments would be catastrophic to roadway safety. Northshore is not able to sustain that amount of traffic without a significant increase in risk to motorists. Do not put greed before what our infrastructure can actually handle safely.Julie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Amber
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Amber (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:01 PM
I strongly oppose the development 8664 S. Northshore Drive (11-N-26-RZ). We have lived in the Kensington subdivision for 13 years and prior to that we lived in Lyons Crossing also located on S. Northshore for 5 years. Over the 18 years we have lived on Northshore, the daily traffic on Northshore has become practically unbearable and not safe. Turning a left at any given time of the day is essentially risking your life; people speed at ridiculous rates. My children who are 16 and 19 are on this street daily as are many many other young drivers along with buses transporting kids to and from Rocky Hill Elem. The area cannot handle any more development at this time. What used to take 5 minutes to get from my home to the Rocky Hill Shopping Center now takes 15 at the least. The roads must be improved and flooding/drainage issues must be addressed. Please vote NO to amendment 11-N-26-RZAmber (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:01 PM
John
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
John (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:16 PM
I would like to respectfully express my opposition to the proposed development along Northshore Drive.John (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:16 PM
While I certainly understand the need for continued growth and additional housing in the Knoxville area, I do have concerns about the potential impact a development of this size could have on the surrounding neighborhoods.
Northshore Drive is already a heavily traveled corridor, and adding this much congestion could place additional strain on traffic flow, infrastructure, and overall road safety. I also believe it is important to consider how a development of this density would fit within the character of the existing residential community.
My concern is not with growth itself, but rather ensuring that new developments are thoughtfully planned and appropriate for the areas in which they are proposed.
I would respectfully encourage our local planning officials to carefully evaluate the potential impact on traffic, safety, and neighboring homeowners before moving forward with this proposal.
Thank you for your time and consideration of the concerns of those of us who live in the surrounding community.
Raina
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Raina (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:19 PM
What surveys have been done on the flood zone and traffic at this spot on Northshore? There are already several fatal crashes each year, as well and many other accidents and the addition of 200 units with further exacerbate these issues. Also, this is a very well know place for flooding to happen. If the earth is removed this will also get worse. Raina (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:19 PM
James
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
James (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:30 PM
I am all for us adding more housing to our community, BUT only when we have the infrastructure to support it. North Shore is overcrowded and dangerous. There aren't even turn lanes on one of Knoxville's busiest roads. Rush hour traffic often goes all the way from Morrell to Knightsbridge! James (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:30 PM
Josie
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Josie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:36 PM
I strongly and wholeheartedly oppose this rezoning proposal.Josie (37922), November 3, 2026 at 2:36 PM
This area of Northshore already experiences excessive traffic congestion, including frequent accidents. There is not transportation/road infrastructure to support this huge additional influx of residences.
Additionally, the area already experiences significant flooding. The environmental impact of this development should prevent its building.
Justin
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Justin (37922), November 3, 2026 at 3:49 PM
I live across the street from this lot.Justin (37922), November 3, 2026 at 3:49 PM
The traffic is already bad through this area. There was an accident a few weeks ago at night that happened right outside my back yard. That kind of activity will increase if a lot of homes are added to this area.
If the lots were larger, this might be something that could work. But adding a large number of people to this already crowded area where the road cannot be expanded is asking for trouble.
Jessi
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Jessi (37922), November 3, 2026 at 3:56 PM
We strongly oppose this rezoning request because placing a large development on an already narrow, heavily burdened corridor poses a serious threat to public safety and the character of our community. This two-lane road is already operating near capacity, and adding hundreds of additional daily vehicle trips will cause severe traffic congestion. Without adequate shoulders, dedicated turn lanes, or clear sightlines, the influx of traffic will dramatically increase the risk of serious wrecks, rear-end collisions, and hazardous bottlenecking. This gridlock also directly endangers residents by delaying emergency medical, fire, and police response times when seconds matter most, all while creating an unsafe environment for children waiting at bus stops. Beyond the immediate infrastructure strain on local roads and services, this dense development prioritizes clear-cutting and pavement over the preservation of the rolling hills, mature tree canopies, abundant wildlife, and open green spaces that make East Tennessee special. Many of us chose to live here precisely for its scenic natural beauty and community character; if we wanted an environment dominated by asphalt, high density, and relentless traffic, we would have chosen an urban center. Growth must be managed responsibly, and approving a high-density subdivision on a roadway entirely incapable of handling it is a public safety hazard that cannot be justified.Jessi (37922), November 3, 2026 at 3:56 PM
Wendy
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Wendy (37922), November 3, 2026 at 3:58 PM
Please, please do not rezone this parcel of land. We have so many issues with heavy traffic, accidents on Northshore and flooding. I live nearby in Lyons Crossing and traffic on Northshore has become almost unbearable. We take our lives in our hand every time we try to make a left turn out of the neighborhood. There are too many drivers and people already! Please listen to the residents who are already here and keep this parcel zoned conservation.Wendy (37922), November 3, 2026 at 3:58 PM
Alyson
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Alyson (37922), November 3, 2026 at 4:26 PM
As a new resident to Knoxville, I cannot speak to the growing traffic over the years, but I can say that Northshore is one of the most congested two lane roads I've used as someone who has lived in Georgia, South Carolina, and Maryland. The road is oversaturated with cards and is a safety hazard on a daily basis, let alone under rainy and ice conditions. I cannot imagine an additional neighborhood adding to this already unsafe traffic pattern. As the infrastructure stands, I current vehemently oppose the zoning proposal for the ways it was degrade quality of life in this area of Knoxville.Alyson (37922), November 3, 2026 at 4:26 PM
Laura
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Laura (37922), November 3, 2026 at 4:55 PM
I absolutely oppose high density development, really any further residential development along Northshore Drive due to high traffic volumes & inadequate infrastructure. It is nearly impossible to make a left turn out of Kensington 7-9am and 3-7pm. Northshore Drive has non-existent shoulders, only deep ditches. This roadways has wrecks on the daily between Wallace Road and Ebeneezer Rd. The water system is also inadequate due to low water pressure. First Utility District is terrible, and likely does not have the capacity to service more developmentLaura (37922), November 3, 2026 at 4:55 PM
Sydney
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Sydney (37922), November 3, 2026 at 5:01 PM
It is already incredibly difficult turning out onto Northshore from my neighborhood, and this is only going to make this much worse and more dangerous! Lots of wrecks happen along here, and it would be in the best interest of everyone involved to plant this subdivision elsewhere!Sydney (37922), November 3, 2026 at 5:01 PM
Atlee
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Atlee (37922), November 3, 2026 at 5:05 PM
I am asking for this rezoning request to be denied. This level of density in this particular location on Northshore will be detrimental. The road cannot handle the current traffic levels and will be significantly worse with the alloted allowance. Please consider the number of traffic accidents from the last year within a mile of the location. That stretch of Northshore should have been improved and widened 25 years ago to handle what is there now. Please do not let this pass. Atlee (37922), November 3, 2026 at 5:05 PM
Adam
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Adam (37922), November 3, 2026 at 5:12 PM
We live near this are and I agree with what everyone is saying. Northshore is not set up for the quantity of people that live in this area now. I fear for my kids pulling on to Northshore as is! Wrecks are already an issue. I know we need more housing, but expand Northshore first to handle this. Please don't let this go through. Adam (37922), November 3, 2026 at 5:12 PM
Marsadee
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Marsadee (37922), November 3, 2026 at 6:16 PM
I live on Kensington Dr. near the proposed site, and my children attend Rocky Hill. I respectfully ask the Commission to deny this rezoning or defer it until a traffic impact study is complete.Marsadee (37922), November 3, 2026 at 6:16 PM
Northshore is already unsafe and over capacity, with no sidewalks or shoulders and heavy backups at peak hours. Adding high density housing would bring hundreds of daily trips to a road that cannot safely handle current traffic.
Children here walk, bike, and wait for buses along these roads. More traffic without improvements puts them at greater risk.
Rocky Hill is already over capacity, and this development adds students with no plan for more space.
Growth should follow infrastructure, not outpace it. This request is premature and inconsistent with the area's plan. If approved, I ask that it be conditioned on lower density and required road and sidewalk improvements.
Thank you,
Marsadee W.
[redacted]
Alicia
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Alicia (37922), November 3, 2026 at 7:20 PM
I strongly oppose rezoning this 11-acre property for high-density development at 12 units per acre. Adding 130+ homes would dramatically change the character of this community and place even more pressure on roads already struggling with traffic, congestion, accidents, and inadequate infrastructure.Alicia (37922), November 3, 2026 at 7:20 PM
This land is an important environmental buffer because of the creek and existing flooding concerns. Increased impervious surface and stormwater runoff could worsen flooding and directly impact neighboring homes and the surrounding community.
It is especially concerning that the developer has not even met with the neighbors who will be most affected. This is not just a zoning change, it will permanently impact our neighborhood's safety, environment, traffic, and quality of life.
Please DENY this rezoning until the full community impact is thoroughly studied.
Dimple
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Dimple (37922), November 3, 2026 at 7:41 PM
Wholeheartedly feel that this development is a bad idea. As it is Northshore is very congested with several bottlenecks and frequent accidents that are not just minor. Before any other developments Northshore needs to be expanded with either a turn lane or pull offs. Dimple (37922), November 3, 2026 at 7:41 PM
In addition, this developer hasn't even met with the neighbors and discussed how the development will affect the flooding impact on the creek.
Please reject this application.
Laura and Jason
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Laura and Jason (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:11 PM
I have lived in two locations off of Northshore for a decade now. During that time I have personally called 911 at least 4 times due to vehicle crashes that have occurred along the stretch of road from Whittington creek to Rudder Lane. To say this road is at capacity for residential traffic is an understatement. As a mother with a teenage driver, the thought of them pulling out onto that road everyday terrifies me and it's not because she is a bad driver, people go too fast and the road wasn't designed to handle this much traffic safely. We should all be outraged that more hasn't been done to first secure the safety of our families before considering the potential for more development. Additionally, the loss of more green space and run off areas will only further the issues we see with road ponding and flooding during storms, making safety concerns that much more critical. I hope the focus will be on improving this critical corridor for the safety of current families before considering adding more. Laura and Jason (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:11 PM
Forrest
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Forrest (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:21 PM
I live off of Northshore drive near the proposed property and I am worried about what would happen to traffic and safety of drivers if this project goes through. I have only lived in this home for 1 year and I've witnessed 3 crashes including multiple different parties from my back porch which backs up to Northshore drive. Pulling out of our neighborhood is also very dangerous at times and can be a very lengthy process. I truly hope the plans of 11-d-26-pa are reconsidered and stopped. Forrest (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:21 PM
Jenn
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Jenn (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:26 PM
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning and apartment development along this section of Northshore Drive.Jenn (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:26 PM
TRAFFIC & ROAD SAFETY: This particular stretch of Northshore is already heavily congested, with dangerous curves, limited visibility, and a history of serious accidents, including fatalities. Adding hundreds of additional vehicles to roads that are already struggling to accommodate existing traffic raises significant safety concerns. These are roads our families and children travel every single day.
FLOODING & DRAINAGE: Flooding is already a concern in this area. Increasing impervious surfaces through large-scale development could further strain existing drainage systems and negatively impact surrounding properties. These risks deserve thorough, independent evaluation before any zoning changes are considered.
INFRASTRUCTURE: Our roads, drainage systems, and public services must be able to safely support the development being proposed. Growth without adequate infrastructure planning places the burden on existing residents.
Please listen to the residents who live here, drive these roads, send their children to these schools, and experience these challenges firsthand.
Ashley
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Ashley (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:36 PM
This land is needed as an environmental buffer and flood zone control. There is no infrastructure for this, traffic and accidents are already too prevalent.Ashley (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:36 PM
Elaine
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Elaine (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:52 PM
I am a resident of Kensington neighborhood, across from the property location pertaining to this rezoninb request. This stretch of Northshore is already extremely congested, especially during morning and evening rush hour. It regularly takes several minutes to turn out of our neighborhood during those times with existing traffic. Serious accidents are unfortunately also extremely common through that stretch, as the road is narrow and winds through curves. There is no room to expand Northshore as a creek borders both sides of the road, and is already the cause of regular flooding when it rains. In addition to the road congestion issues, our local schools, Rocky Hill Elementary in particular, is already far exceeding capacity and does not have the space to accommodate so many more children from this high of a density housing development. The developers of this project have made no attempt to contact anyone in the HOAs of Kensington or other surrounding neighborhoods to discuss the potential project and do not have the best interests of the community in mind with this proposal. Elaine (37922), November 3, 2026 at 8:52 PM
Jennifer
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Jennifer (37922), November 3, 2026 at 9:12 PM
Please do not approve this rezoning request. There is already enough traffic in this area and adding this many more housing units will only make an already bad situation worse. For once can you refrain from approving a rezoning- listen to the constituents.Jennifer (37922), November 3, 2026 at 9:12 PM
Sarah
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Sarah (37922), November 3, 2026 at 9:54 PM
I have concerns about public safety and traffic. Northshore is only two lanes, with no pull offs and no center turning lane. I think a traffic impact study needs to be conducted and reviewed by Knox County Engineering and TDOT since Northshore is a state highway. Sarah (37922), November 3, 2026 at 9:54 PM
Beth
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Beth (37922), November 3, 2026 at 10:04 PM
Please reconsider approving this zoning request. Northshore is overly congested at all times of day, with accidents happening constantly. Our neighborhood entrance and the adjoining telephone pole have been hit multiple times, causing damage to neighborhood property and resulting in multiple power outages. (No life-threatening injuries.). The property being considered for rezoning floods frequently. Without significant infrastructure upgrades on Northshore Dr and to the property in question, responsible and sustainable development is not feasible at this time. Beth (37922), November 3, 2026 at 10:04 PM
Zach
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Zach (37922), November 4, 2026 at 5:55 AM
I live in Lyons Crossing, and my parents live nearby. This 11-acre property sits right in the middle of the area we drive every day, and I'm asking you to deny the rezoning for 200+ apartments.Zach (37922), November 4, 2026 at 5:55 AM
Traffic is already at a breaking point. During the morning and afternoon commutes, it takes 15+ minutes just to get through Rocky Hill or the Ebenezer/Northshore intersection. Adding hundreds more cars between two busy entrances will make it worse and more dangerous.
This land also acts as a flood buffer for the creek and surrounding homes. Paving it over sends that water into our neighborhoods.
The developer hasn't even met with the neighbors. The people who live here deserve a voice before a project this size moves forward.
I'm not against growth, but this is the wrong place for it. Please deny the rezoning.
Lisa
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Lisa (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:08 AM
The property's Rural Conservation and Stream Protection designations are especially important. Concerns about flooding and drainage should be investigated through a thorough engineering review, including downstream impacts. Replacing open land with roofs and pavement must not leave neighboring homeowners facing additional runoff, erosion, or water intrusion.Lisa (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:08 AM
Before approving either request, the County should require a cumulative traffic and safety analysis, verified utility and emergency-service capacity, and enforceable infrastructure improvements. Promises of addressing problems later are not adequate protection for existing residents.
Please deny these requests as proposed. Protecting the community means ensuring that the scale and location of development fit both the surrounding neighborhoods and the infrastructure available to serve it.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261104060857.pdf
Amy
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Amy (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:11 AM
Before approving any additional apartment complexes, the county needs to conduct a comprehensive impact assessment. We need to be looking at traffic patterns, road capacity, school enrollment and capacity, emergency services, and the overall impact on the surrounding communities. Our roads are already congested, and our schools are dealing with growth and capacity challenges. Adding hundreds of additional residents without first addressing these issues is irresponsible planning.Amy (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:11 AM
It is frustrating to see development prioritized without considering the long-term consequences for the people who already live here. Growth should not happen simply because developers see an opportunity to build. There needs to be a thoughtful plan that considers whether our infrastructure, schools, and community can actually support it. Approving more apartments without addressing these concerns is a horrible idea.
Chris
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Chris (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:08 AM
I respectfully disagree with this proposed development. 130+ units on this section of Northshore Rd will create more congestion on an already challenging stretch of 2-lane road for East and Westbound traffic. It certainly won't make it any safer as now more drivers would have to turn left onto Westbound Northshore, and cross the Eastbound lanes.Chris (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:08 AM
The proposed 11 acres is also low lying and flood prone, so drainage for a development of this size would be a major concern during high rainfall weather events as the flood water currently runs across Northshore Rd at the Tooles Bend curve.
Katie
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Katie (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:27 AM
Traffic is already increasingly a huge issue on North Shore. I'm concerned that adding this number of houses off North Shore would just exacerbate the problem. I also want to preserve the beauty of North Shore as much as possible.Katie (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:27 AM
Holly
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Holly (37922), November 4, 2026 at 10:06 AM
I live in Whittington Creek. Northshore road is already at capacity. Please do not build any more residential buildings in this area. Currently, it is a huge safety issue. I can't imagine what it will be like if more residential buildings are built. Holly (37922), November 4, 2026 at 10:06 AM
Penny
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Penny (37922), November 4, 2026 at 11:06 AM
I have lived in Whittington Creek, just west of this proposed development, for 10 years. Prior to that, I lived in Lyons Crossing, just east of this proposed development, for 16 years. In the 26+ years that I have lived along Northshore Drive, the traffic and congestion have increased exponentially to the point that it is nearly impossible to turn left at any time of the day. There is simply not the infrastructure to support the volume of cars on Northshore as it is. This proposed development will only make the problem worse. Further, this proposed development will exacerbate the flooding problems along Northshore. At times, parts of Northshore have been completely covered with water, thus blocking east-west traffic of a major roadway. This proposed development does not adequately mitigate the impacts to the creek that is adjacent to the road. Finally, the developer of this proposed project has made no effort to communicate with the affected neighborhoods along this stretch of Northshore to gain insight and perhaps better plan to minimize or avoid these adverse impacts. The property owners in this area - who are voters and taxpayers - deserve better. I urge you to vote NO and reject this application.Penny (37922), November 4, 2026 at 11:06 AM
jay
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
jay (37922), November 4, 2026 at 11:58 AM
I am opposed to development with density off Northshore. This road is already dangerous as evidenced by the number of tombstone markers located on it. We do not need to compound it with increased traffic count while it remains a two-lane road.jay (37922), November 4, 2026 at 11:58 AM
John
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
John (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:13 PM
I have lived in this area for over 30 years and first bought property about 35 years ago. I live within a mile of the property. I have seen tremendous development in the area, particularly in the last few years. Unfortunately the infrastructure has had minimal upgrade. I feel that such a high density development would be a catastrophic impact on the area increasing traffic, putting excessive strain on local utilities and schools. I am particularly concerned about the impact on an already tenuous water drainage situation. John (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:13 PM
John
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
John (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:15 PM
Good day. I am a property owner and resident in the Whittington Creek subdivision, which is closely adjacent to the parcel for which rezoning to allow construction of apartment units is before the Commission. While carefully planned housing additions in Knox County are certainly reasonable, I must respectfully object to this rezoning. The area in question is an already heavily-congested section of South Northshore Drive. The road is narrow and winding. Shoulders are limited and there is often bicycle traffic. Turning onto Northshore in this general area is already a challenge at many times of the day owing to heavy traffic. Increasing that traffic on this already limited road will make travel on South Northshore Drive even more challenging and dangerous. We do not need additional housing density in that location. The parcel is zoned Rural Conservation in order to help preserve the resources of this part of Knox County and to limit potentially detrimental development, which the proposed construction would represent. I would urge the Commission to reject the requested zoning change and maintain that property as a Rural Conservation Zone.John (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:15 PM
Rachel
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Rachel (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:18 PM
I am a homeowner in this area and am extremely concerned about the proposed rezoning at 8664 S. Northshore Drive (11-N-26-RZ).Rachel (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:18 PM
This section of Northshore is already extremely dangerous due to the traffic and narrow two-lane road. Many serious wrecks occur in this area and adding this many new units would further worsen the situation. I am very worried about the safety of my family, friends and neighbors if this rezoning were to pass, and am strongly opposed to this proposal.
Elizabeth
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Elizabeth (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:51 PM
I strongly oppose both the comprehensive plan amendment (11-D-26-PA) and the rezoning (11-N-26-RZ) for 8684 S. Northshore Drive, and I expect the Commission to deny them.Elizabeth (37922), November 4, 2026 at 12:51 PM
I live in an established neighborhood along the South Northshore corridor, and I see vehicle accidents and volume-related road problems several times a week. This narrow, two-lane road cannot safely absorb the traffic that development at 12 units per acre with higher density housing would bring.
The undeveloped acreage here is central to this area's character and long-term health. It carries a Rural Conservation designation for good reason, and that protection should hold.
Our schools are equally unprepared. Their facilities are already stretched to capacity, and with funding cut year after year, they have no means to absorb an influx of this scale.
My neighborhood is full of young families. We are organized, we are paying attention, and we vote. We will oppose this development at every stage, from this hearing through County Commission. Deny this request.
Hayley
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Hayley (37922), November 4, 2026 at 1:27 PM
Shortened to keep within character count: full comments attached: Hayley (37922), November 4, 2026 at 1:27 PM
I oppose the proposed rezoning and increased density at this location. I live less than a mile away and have lived along the Northshore corridor for nearly 40 years. I have witnessed tremendous growth with few meaningful infrastructure improvements to keep pace.
S. Northshore Drive is already a congested, narrow, curving two-lane road with limited shoulders and guardrails. My family travels it daily, and in the past six months alone, I have stopped twice to assist drivers who went off the roadway.
I am also concerned about flooding and drainage, water and sewer capacity, and the cumulative impact of continued growth on our schools.
I support responsible growth, but our infrastructure must be able to support it. I respectfully ask the Planning Commission to deny this request or defer action until comprehensive traffic, utility, drainage and school-capacity impacts are evaluated and shared publicly.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261104132748.pdf
Sarah
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Sarah (37922), November 4, 2026 at 1:52 PM
I am not supportive of this development. As a resident of the Northshore corridor, I already battle dangerous levels of traffic daily. I cannot safely turn out of my subdivision at certain busy times of the day and feel that Northshore cannot sustain any more residential traffic. Sarah (37922), November 4, 2026 at 1:52 PM
Matthew
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Matthew (37922), November 4, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Has already stated by all the other prior comments, most of which I agree with this would be a bad idea for the area. Please vote no. Matthew (37922), November 4, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Patrick
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Patrick (37922), November 4, 2026 at 2:27 PM
I strongly oppose both 11-D-26-PA and 11-N-26-RZ and urge the Planning Commission to deny these requests.Patrick (37922), November 4, 2026 at 2:27 PM
My greatest concern is public safety. Northshore Drive is already a dangerous, heavily congested two-lane road with limited shoulders and inadequate turning lanes. The 2021 Northshore Drive Corridor Study documented crash rates above the statewide average along nearly the entire corridor. Adding potentially 135 residences would only increase traffic, dangerous intersections, and the risk of serious accidents.
I am particularly concerned about families, young drivers, school buses, and emergency responders. Additional congestion could delay emergency vehicles when every second matters.
Flooding is another major concern. This area already experiences drainage problems, and replacing natural land with pavement and rooftops could worsen flooding and threaten neighboring properties.
The proposed density of up to 12 dwellings per acre is also inconsistent with surrounding neighborhoods. It would permanently change the character of the area while eliminating valuable green space and wildlife habitat.
Before considering development of this magnitude, the county must address existing road safety issues, flooding, and infrastructure limitations.
Knoxville needs responsible growth, but infrastructure and public safety must come first. I strongly urge the Commission to deny both applications and protect the safety and long-term interests of our community.
Douglas
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Douglas (37922), November 4, 2026 at 2:49 PM
This proposed location holds a substantial amount of traffic that is barely sustainable currently. 100+ new units isn't feasible as the narrow Northshore corridor is already very dangerous and have seen cars pass against a yellow line at this very spot. Douglas (37922), November 4, 2026 at 2:49 PM
The needless amount of random sprawl is a blight on Knoxville currently. This location is zoned to protect natural resources and that continues to make good common sense.
No doubt Knox County needs additional housing inventory but this is not a reasonable plan and will endanger each driver who passes Northshore daily.
Micah
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Micah (37922), November 4, 2026 at 3:36 PM
I am a resident of the Northshore corridor who commutes on it daily. Northshore already suffers from traffic backups and it is not feasible nor desirable to expand it. Reclassifying this land from agricultural to allow dense residential development with multi-unit dwellings would further exacerbate the traffic problem. Additionally, it goes against the Advance Knox comprehensive plan that has already been developed.Micah (37922), November 4, 2026 at 3:36 PM
Keli
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Keli (37922), November 4, 2026 at 5:30 PM
Please do not allow this development to be constructed. My family has lived in our home since 1998. Since 2020, the traffic has increased significantly. Northshore has become very dangerous due to the increase and not being modified to accommodate the traffic. We struggle to turn off of Tooles Bend in the mornings and afternoon especially. There have been too many accidents already. Please reconsider this as in the interests of the public safety and not for the additional tax revenue! Keli (37922), November 4, 2026 at 5:30 PM
matthew
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
matthew (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:45 PM
I strongly urge that the planning commission turn down the application for the development of this property, given the present volumes of traffic on Northshore. My wife and I live in Whittington Creek and my daughter and her family, including our 3 grandchildren, live across Northshore on Saint Ives Boulevard. Although they live only 0.4 miles away from us, we have to come out of our subdivision and turn left, waiting for a column of traffic to present us with a narrow opening, which may take many minutes to finally allow us to rapidly accelerate and dodge the oncoming traffic. To allow a new development to feed more vehicles into Northshore, without solving our present daunting traffic flow issue, would only worsen a presently unsafe traffic situation.matthew (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:45 PM
Matthew and Barbara M.
Erin
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Erin (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:47 PM
Northshore is already entirely too busy with residential traffic. An apartment complex further adding to the residential traffic is the last thing we need. Not mention the overcrowding at the schools which would be directly affected by this apartment complex. Erin (37922), November 4, 2026 at 6:47 PM
Molly
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Molly (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:02 PM
I agree with aforementioned points re: concerns about the proposed development at 8684 S. Northshore drive. As a non-native Knoxvillian I was shocked when moving here to see how many highly trafficked roads are narrow, winding and only two lanes (Westland, Northshore, Lyons view, etc). Northshore is inconvenient at best, beyond miserable at worst. My biggest concerns are flooding and the further deterioration of the land with increased movement of water and the loss of protected wildlife space, increased congestion on the road and subsequent statistical likelihood of increased accidents and the complete and total disregard for Rocky Hill Elementary School and the impacts 120+ units could have on a school (like all of the schools in Knox co) that are facing cut after cut after cut. There is no infrastructure to support a community like this in the location that is being suggested. Listen to your community, not to the number on the check.Molly (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:02 PM
Ben
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Ben (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:15 PM
As a next-door neighbor to the proposed development, I strongly oppose this rezoning proposal. As another so astutely noted, none of the plan amendment criteria (5) have been met. The infrastructure is not in place to support this type of development in this area. The narrow road lacks a turning lane and floods quite impressively (I've witnessed it many times) not only because of the, lay of the land, but also because of the natural creeks that run by the roadway. This development will negatively affect flooding due to runoff. Also, proposing such a dense dwelling unit does not fit the scope and character of this rural area. There are many other suitable areas in Knoxville that would gladly support this type of endeavor. It seems that this location is desirable to the developer primarily due to the monetary benefit this zip code brings. He certainly did not meet with me or any other neighbors (to my knowledge) to discuss concerns. Otherwise, this proposal would never have been attempted. To approve this without first addressing the areas of concern such as the roadway, flooding, high density of units, etc would be reckless. I respectfully urge the planning commission members to vote NO.Ben (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:15 PM
James
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
James (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:21 PM
Subject: Request to Reconsider Rezoning Case 11-N-26-RZ, 8684 S NorthshoreJames (37922), November 4, 2026 at 8:21 PM
Dear Members of the Commission,
I'm writing to respectfully ask the Commission to reconsider the rezoning request for Case 11-N-26-RZ at 8684 S Northshore, which would allow a 130-unit, multi-tent housing development on an 11-acre site.
I recognize the need for housing, but I'm concerned that a development of this scale may not be appropriate for this site unless its impacts are fully addressed. I ask the Commission to carefully review the proposal's plans for traffic and access, emergency services, water and sewer capacity, drainage, lighting, noise, waste management, and buffering from nearby properties.
Before making a decision, please consider requesting additional information about these impacts, allowing another opportunity for public comment, and evaluating whether changes, such as reducing or phasing the number of units, improving site buffers, or adding clear operating and emergency-response plans, would better address community concerns.
Thank you for considering my request and the concerns of residents near 8684 S Northshore.
Brad
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Brad (37922), November 4, 2026 at 9:03 PM
I am a resident in Whittington Creek and oppose this plan. It would place significant additional demand on infrastructure, especially traffic safety concerns on Northshore. Any discussion of more development in this area must be accompanied with requirements that developers fund a widening of Northshore, installation of traffic lights, or other remedial measures to counter the effects of additional demand.Brad (37922), November 4, 2026 at 9:03 PM
Hannah
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Hannah (37922), November 4, 2026 at 9:18 PM
I have lived in Whittington Creek the last 11 years and traffic is already getting much worse in the past 5 years after the multiple apartment complex developments off Ebeneezer and that is a 4 lane road. Northshore is a 2 lane road that is curvy and windy and adding more traffic and congestion would make Northshore a nightmare. Also, adding an apartment complex development and would also create more dangerous roads with people turning out of the new apartment complex going either way on Northshore. I do not think this is a good idea. Also, with flooding, Northshore often floods in those zones where the apartments are going to be built. Northshore is already congested enough and does not need any more traffic added to it. Hannah (37922), November 4, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Michael
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Michael (37922), November 5, 2026 at 9:18 AM
I have lived in west Knoxville for 40 years and Whittington Creek since 1999. As more and more residential developments have increased over the years Northshore Dr. has been left as is. Because it is still restricted to two lanes with minimal access to turn lanes, it has reached capacity for safe driving. Knox County saw the same problem with Ebenezer/Peters Rd. years ago. It was a dangerous overdeveloped area. Now it is a safe 5-lane thoroughfare. Adding more residential developments without improving Northshore is a danger to public safety. Please deny any changes from Agriculture to Residential anywhere along the Northshore corridor. Thank you for your service. Michael (37922), November 5, 2026 at 9:18 AM
Andy
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Andy (37922), November 5, 2026 at 10:04 AM
My name is Andy P. and I live in the Wittington Creek Subdivision. I strongly oppose the proposed change in permitted zoning. Northshore Drive is currently inadequate to handle the existing traffic patterns on the road. Getting out of my subdivision is difficult, traffic is often backed up in and around the Rocky Hill Village area, and frequent road and tree maintenance often cause long delays with my commute. Andy (37922), November 5, 2026 at 10:04 AM
In my opinion, this proposal should be viewed along the same lines as the relatively recent development proposal down Tools Bend Road (in the last 10 years). Unit the Northshore infrastructure is changed to accomodate more vehicle traffic, adding higher density developments such as this will only increase traffic and traffic accidents.
Ashley
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Ashley (37922), November 5, 2026 at 10:38 AM
I oppose this development. Traffic is already difficult in this area and I have concerns about where the water that routinely floods this area will go. Also Rocky Hill ES is at capacity. Nothing about this makes sense. Ashley (37922), November 5, 2026 at 10:38 AM
It's ok to have green space! Not every speck of land in Knox county needs to have housing built on it.
Kevin
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Kevin (37922), November 5, 2026 at 12:29 PM
I strongly oppose this rezoning. We have lived in the Whittington Creek neighborhood off Northshore since 2004 and since that time there has been a dramatic increase in traffic and feel that adding more properties to Northshore drive will be a safety concern due to the further increase in traffic volume. Turning left out of our neighborhood requires a lot of caution not only due to the traffic volume increase but also the speeds that cars drive. The section of Northshore near our neighborhood has more of a straight section and speeds exceed well over 50 MPH. In my opinion, this road is not large enough to handle the current volume and further development on Northshore Drive needs to be stopped.Kevin (37922), November 5, 2026 at 12:29 PM
Monica
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Monica (37922), November 5, 2026 at 2:06 PM
I strongly oppose rezoning request 11-N-26-RZ due to the significant traffic congestion already affecting this area. There are more appropriate locations throughout Knoxville that could better accommodate a development of this nature. Moving forward with this project at the proposed location would only worsen existing traffic conditions and create unnecessary safety risks for both current and future residents.Monica (37922), November 5, 2026 at 2:06 PM
Daniel
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Daniel (37922), November 5, 2026 at 2:38 PM
It is my understanding that the creek is under protected status, I do not see anything mentioned about changing that status in this rezoning petition. Daniel (37922), November 5, 2026 at 2:38 PM
It is my belief that there is a cave entrance on the northwest section of this property, that would likely present protected wildlife.
Northshore and surrounding roads cannot handle more traffic during perfect conditions, the addition of 200+ cars to this during the occurrence of situations like flooding would exacerbate an already overburdened infrastructure. The northern half of this property is within a FEMA flood zone. The addition of these cars to the alternate routes taken during flooding would exacerbate an already dangerous situation.
Finally, it is wise to consider all rezoning requests adjoining naturally flowing springs may be with duplicitous intent, in that a successful rezoning may be the first step toward our communities first water cooled data plant.
Natalie
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Natalie (37922), November 5, 2026 at 2:58 PM
Northshore Road is quickly becoming a main artery in Knoxville and the infrastructure set in place was never intended for it to be a main artery. Northshore traffic is already a concern for many people and this will further increase traffic and increase the dangers of this road. Natalie (37922), November 5, 2026 at 2:58 PM
Jack
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Jack (37922), November 5, 2026 at 6:28 PM
This historic State Road can't handle any more traffic. We really need to have less traffic than we have now and this development will crush the travelers that are trying to make it home to their families. Please stop this development!Jack (37922), November 5, 2026 at 6:28 PM
Rachel
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Rachel (37922), November 5, 2026 at 8:04 PM
I have lived off Northshore all of my life. Now, as I raise my children here, I long to preserve the beauty, safety, and quality of life of this beautiful stretch of East Tennessee. The proposed development threatens to degrade all of these aspects of our life. I strongly oppose the rezoning of agricultural land to high density residential living. This will add an even higher volume of traffic to Northshore Drive. Over the past few years, there has been an increase in motor vehicle accidents between Kensington Drive and Bickerstaff Boulevard. It is hard to imagine how difficult traffic would be if this development were established. It concerns me for watershed issues as well as the overcrowding effects to local public schools. Please prioritize maintaining property values and preserving quality of life for the residents of our community! Rachel (37922), November 5, 2026 at 8:04 PM
Alex
37922
37922
11-B-26-RZ
Alex (37922), November 6, 2026 at 12:30 AM
Years ago, before the economy downturn around 2008, the property was zoned as an office park, which was basically neighborhood commercial with offices that blended into the surrounding residential. It was going to be the office for a residential construction company, a real estate office, a mortgage company, a law firm and other low traffic offices pertaining to the residential construction industry. The economy took a downturn and it was never completed.Alex (37922), November 6, 2026 at 12:30 AM
The immediate area around the property has remained single family residential with new homes filling the vacant land and so to stay more in character with the neighborhood, the request is to downzone the property from offices to single family residential townhouses. The application is for PR planned residential 5 units per acre on 3 acres, which makes a total of 15 townhouses.
Mary-Elizabeth
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Mary-Elizabeth (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:29 AM
I strongly oppose this rezoning and proposed development request. The proposed density is not compatible with the existing character of this section of South Northshore Drive, which is predominantly low-density residential.Mary-Elizabeth (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:29 AM
Northshore is a narrow two lane road with minimal shoulders and few alternate routes. The current congestion associated with routine road work, lane closures, and normal daily traffic is already an issue. While the traffic generated by this development may represent only a small percentage increase on paper, even a 6% increase can have a significant impact on a roadway that already carries more than 15,000 vehicles per day and is operating beyond its intended capacity. Several nearby four lane roads carry less traffic than Northshore despite having substantially greater capacity.
I am also concerned about public safety and emergency response. Northshore serves as a critical east-west route with limited alternatives for emergency vehicles responding to incidents west of this location. Increased traffic on an already narrow corridor could further impede emergency access and response times.
I respectfully request that this rezoning be denied because the proposed density is not appropriate for the existing road network, surrounding land uses, and infrastructure serving this area.
James
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
James (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:30 AM
I have added my comments in the attached letter. James (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:30 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261106113044.pdf
Rachel
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Rachel (37922), November 6, 2026 at 1:29 PM
The number of proposed houses is too intense for the current road and traffic count. Please don't put the cart in front of the horse. That intensity is better suited for a 4 lane road with turn lanes like on Ebenezer. Rachel (37922), November 6, 2026 at 1:29 PM
Fred
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Fred (37922), November 6, 2026 at 1:30 PM
I have lived in the Bennington/Ebenezer Road and now in the Whittington Creek/Northshore Drive area since 1989 and have experienced all the growth along these thoroughfares. My daughter teaches at Rocky Hill Elementary School and drives there via Northshore every day. See attached pdf for details of my opposition.Fred (37922), November 6, 2026 at 1:30 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261106133039.pdf
Christina
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Christina (37922), November 6, 2026 at 4:23 PM
Please see the attached letter. Christina (37922), November 6, 2026 at 4:23 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261106162348.pdf
Katie
37922
37922
11-B-26-PA
Katie (37922), November 6, 2026 at 6:07 PM
Hello,Katie (37922), November 6, 2026 at 6:07 PM
As a resident of a neighborhood off S Northshore in the area of this rezoning request, I am incredibly concerned over the lack of infrastructure to support any additional residential density. S Norhshore is a two lane road that cannot handle any more traffic. Most of our neighborhoods are only accessible via S Northshore. It is nearly impossible to get in or out safely as it is now. I have seen countless wrecks as people are simply trying to get in or out. In addition, the storm water management in this area is at maximum capacity. Our neighborhood is dealing with a significant erosion issue caused by the runoff from neighborhoods above us. Please give careful consideration to addressing the infrastructure before approving any rezoning along S Northshore. Thank you.
Katie
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Katie (37922), November 6, 2026 at 6:14 PM
Good Evening,Katie (37922), November 6, 2026 at 6:14 PM
I am writing to express my concerns over the proposed rezoning to allow residential development of this parcel. The infrastructure in this simply cannot absorb any more residential development at this time. S Northshore is already way over crowded with neighborhoods whose only access is off S Northshore. As a resident of one of these neighborhoods, I can attest that at times it is nearly impossible to get in and out of my neighborhood. The road cannot handle any more traffic. And in addition to the traffic, there are environmental issues to consider. The current infrastructure and creek system cannot handle any additional water runoff from new residential neighborhoods. Please do not add to an already dangerous road and overbuilt infrastructure. Thank you.
Thomas
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Thomas (37922), November 6, 2026 at 8:32 PM
This would be horrible addition to an already over crowded area. Many wrecks occur very close to where this land is.Thomas (37922), November 6, 2026 at 8:32 PM
Northshore is a 2 lane road and already has problems supporting the traffic going both ways.
Construction vehicles on this road are also challenged by how narrow it is and it would only be a matter of time before a fatal accident would happen.
Please don't make a crowded area even worse. I have lived here many years and would like to pass my home on to my son.
Allison
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Allison (37922), November 6, 2026 at 8:42 PM
I have concerns about adding traffic to an already congested area of Northshore Drive. It is already difficult to travel both directions on Northshore, particularly at rush hour, especially when taking left turns. Allison (37922), November 6, 2026 at 8:42 PM
In addition, the higher density development is not compatible with the character of the surrounding community, and further, would have negative impact on the environment since development, and loss of green space would further disrupt wildlife habitats and negatively affect the area's natural environment.
It is also important to note that local schools are already experiencing capacity challenges, and additional residential development could place further demands on school facilities and resources.
Thomas
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Thomas (37922), November 6, 2026 at 8:49 PM
I am strongly opposed to this development, and I think there are some pretty significant issues that need to be considered.Thomas (37922), November 6, 2026 at 8:49 PM
Traffic and infrastructure are my biggest concerns. Northshore Drive already struggles with traffic, and anyone who regularly travels this stretch knows that. Adding 130 residential units and all the additional daily commuters to an already congested area is only going to make things worse. The bigger issue is that there is very little, if any, room to expand the roadway or make the infrastructure improvements needed to support that kind of growth.
Drainage and flooding are another major concern. This area already experiences flooding issues. Adding more rooftops, parking lots, and pavement will increase stormwater runoff and potentially make an existing problem worse.
Beyond that, 130 units on approximately 11 acres is drastically out of step with the surrounding neighborhoods, which are generally 3-5 units per acre. The added lighting, loss of green space, impact on wildlife, and additional strain on schools and public resources are also concerns.
Ultimately, I don't believe this location has the infrastructure or capacity to support a development of this size. The impact on existing residents needs to be taken seriously before decisions like this are made.
Sarah
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Sarah (37922), November 6, 2026 at 10:33 PM
I am a resident of Old Kensington and am very concerned about this proposal. Northshore Rd is narrow with steep drops. It is prone to flood and visibility for cars trying to enter Northshore is difficult. Wrecks have become more of a common occurrence in this area and increased traffic will only make this road more congested and dangerous. The developer hasn't meet with neighbors or spoken to surrounding HOAs. This number of proposed properties will also add a strain to our already crowded schools.Sarah (37922), November 6, 2026 at 10:33 PM
Andrew
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Andrew (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:00 PM
I strongly oppose Case 11-N-26-RZ and Case 11-D-26-PA and respectfully request that both be denied. I have lived in the Northshore area for over 30 years. Expansion has intensified pressure on our community. Roads ofcourse are congested but also other resources, S. Northshore Drive is already heavily congested, and our roads, schools, stormwater systems, utilities, and emergency services. I am concerned about increasing this property from Agricultural zoning to Planned Residential at up to 12 units per acre and changing its plan designation from Rural Conservation to Suburban Residential. The plan for any developer is of course to ask for 12 but settle for less units/acre. But any additional growth in this corridor is not sustainable currently and to approve would be to support irresponsible growth. Please do not approve this re zoning. Andrew (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:00 PM
Andrew
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Andrew (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:00 PM
I strongly oppose Case 11-N-26-RZ and Case 11-D-26-PA and respectfully request that both be denied. I have lived in the Northshore area for over 30 years. Expansion has intensified pressure on our community. Roads ofcourse are congested but also other resources, S. Northshore Drive is already heavily congested, and our roads, schools, stormwater systems, utilities, and emergency services. I am concerned about increasing this property from Agricultural zoning to Planned Residential at up to 12 units per acre and changing its plan designation from Rural Conservation to Suburban Residential. The plan for any developer is of course to ask for 12 but settle for less units/acre. But any additional growth in this corridor is not sustainable currently and to approve would be to support irresponsible growth. Please do not approve this re zoning. Andrew (37922), November 6, 2026 at 11:00 PM
Bri
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Bri (37922), November 7, 2026 at 12:37 AM
For the reasons outlined in the attached comments and corresponding exhibits, I respectfully request denial of applications 11-D-26-PA and 11-N-26-RZ as proposed.Bri (37922), November 7, 2026 at 12:37 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261107003755.pdf
Chris
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Chris (37922), November 7, 2026 at 12:50 AM
Please see attached comments opposing 11-D-26-PA and 11-N-26-RZ.Chris (37922), November 7, 2026 at 12:50 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261107005023.pdf
Carolyn
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Carolyn (37922), November 7, 2026 at 8:06 AM
Traffic on Northshore has become horrendous as it is. Additional housing will cause more congestion. There is no infrastructure in place to support this. Accidents, including fatalities, are already prevalent. Northshore cannot sustain current traffic. Carolyn (37922), November 7, 2026 at 8:06 AM
The property is needed for purposes it is already zoned for. It's an environmental buffer and flood zone control. If housing is put on the property what will cause when heavy rains occur.
Carolyn
Blake
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Blake (37922), November 7, 2026 at 8:57 AM
I request you deny the request to rezone the requested off S Northshore Dr from ag to residential. As a resident in Kensington we have witnessed the unbelievable increase of traffic all hours of the day through this area with increased traffic and wait times along with difficulty exiting our neighborhood. The amount of car accidents right along this stretch is growing rapidly and the amount of high school age children driving puts them at more risk by allowing this proposal. We are overcrowding pockets of West Knoxville where infrastructure including roads and schools cannot handle the growth. Please refrain from moving this proposal forward. Blake (37922), November 7, 2026 at 8:57 AM
Denise
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Denise (37922), November 7, 2026 at 6:54 PM
We do not support building a multi unit housing complex. Northshore cannot support the increased volume.Denise (37922), November 7, 2026 at 6:54 PM
Meghan
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Meghan (37922), November 7, 2026 at 8:41 PM
#35 Meghan (37922), November 7, 2026 at 8:41 PM
11-N-26-RZ
11-D-26-PA
The area you are wanting to rezone on Northshore needs to stay as is. Changing it to add more homes to that area is insane! It's a dangerous area to bring MORE traffic to. I drive Northshore daily and the traffic is becoming more dangerous. There are so many vehicles on the road that pulling out of a subdivision must be done at high speeds. Turning out on Wallace can take 10 minutes *minimum* during rush hour. I would suggest you try pulling out there and at all subdivisions in between during rush hour before you change the zoning for someone to make money!
Mark
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Mark (37922), November 8, 2026 at 1:43 PM
I strongly oppose 11-D-26-PA.Mark (37922), November 8, 2026 at 1:43 PM
We have lived in Lyons Crossing for over 30 years. Northshore traffic has gotten progressively worse over time and, as a result, more dangerous due to growth over the years. We should not be adding any more significant developments between Ebeneezer and Westland until the Northshore has been redeveloped to 4 lanes plus a turning lane similar to Ebeneezer. Otherwise, it will soon be gridlock with more accidents and injury.
Mark
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Mark (37922), November 8, 2026 at 1:44 PM
I strongly oppose 11-N-26-RZMark (37922), November 8, 2026 at 1:44 PM
We have lived in Lyons Crossing for over 30 years. Northshore traffic has gotten progressively worse over time and, as a result, more dangerous due to growth over the years. We should not be adding any more significant developments between Ebeneezer and Westland until the Northshore has been redeveloped to 4 lanes plus a turning lane similar to Ebeneezer. Otherwise, it will soon be gridlock with more accidents and injury.
Mary Ellen
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Mary Ellen (37922), November 8, 2026 at 2:16 PM
I strongly oppose 11-D-26-PAMary Ellen (37922), November 8, 2026 at 2:16 PM
I have lived in Lyons Crossing for over 30 years. it is very difficult to turn left out of any of these neighborhoods at any time of the day, not just rush hour. Northshore needs to be widened before any more development happens.
Mary Ellen
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Mary Ellen (37922), November 8, 2026 at 2:17 PM
I strongly oppose 11-N-26-RZMary Ellen (37922), November 8, 2026 at 2:17 PM
I have lived in Lyons Crossing for over 30 years. it is very difficult to turn left out of any of these neighborhoods at any time of the day, not just rush hour. Northshore needs to be widened before any more development happens.
Alexander
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Alexander (37922), November 8, 2026 at 6:09 PM
My wife and I grew up in Kensington, and went to Rocky Hill and then to Bearden. Traffic was always bad and has only gotten worse. Turning left on Northshore is extremely difficult and dangerous now. I moved back into Kensington recently with my wife and son. The current traffic is bad enough and this level of development will make it much worse. We cannot have any additional developments without the roads and infrastructure to support it. If approved this will negatively affect every homeowner in this area. Alexander (37922), November 8, 2026 at 6:09 PM
William
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
William (37922), November 9, 2026 at 7:52 AM
I am opposed to rezoning this for residential development. Northshore drive is already unprepared for the current traffic that we have. There is no way to expand the road, and the road already has a drop off to a creek along the north side of the road just adjacent to this planned development that is very dangerous. There's no berm along the road adjacent to the creek. Leaving Kensington addition from the east exit is already dangerous due to the curve in the road to the west of the exit, which will only get worse with more traffic. That area is also prone to flooding which will only get worse if there's more housing. I believe that this area along Northshore drive is completely saturated with housing and no further development should occur. There is also wildlife there that will be displaced if that is developed.William (37922), November 9, 2026 at 7:52 AM
William
37922
37922
11-A-26-PA
William (37922), November 9, 2026 at 8:50 AM
I am not in favor of this rezoning to NC due to current infrastructure.William (37922), November 9, 2026 at 8:50 AM
I would be in favor of a neighborhood deli, bakery, coffee shop or other local gathering space. But there would need to be improvements to Bluegrass and Mourfield road for me to support this plan.
For Neighborhood Commercial there needs to be some form of connection to the surround neighborhoods. There are no sidewalks or even a shoulder to walk on to get to the proposed development. There is no infrastructure to support biking or walking to this property from the surrounding neighborhoods.
For any commercial property there is a need to be supplied so that the commercial entity can have goods to sell. Any road leading into the property's location on bluegrass, has a tight turn that a tractor trailer would have to cross the center lane to accomplish the turn. This combined with the narrow lanes on Bluegrass make for a large safety risk to the community. Even School buses must currently wait for the road to be clear on both sides before turning in or out of neighborhood.
Also, if this Neighborhhod Commercial rezoning is for a storage unit, as was commented earlier. There are already storage units on Westland and Northshore near the Pellissippi parkway. This use would not serve the narrow lanes of Bluegrass road. Already when lawn services come down the road with their trailers, it is uncomfortable to be driving in the other lane due to the width of the trailers.
Thank you, Will.
Adair
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Adair (37922), November 9, 2026 at 10:00 AM
I live in a subdivision just down the road from this plot of land off of S. Northshore and want to echo everyone's comments. This area is already too developed and the roads cannot handle more cars without widening which seems impossible for Northshore. While they've done large projects to prevent future flooding issues (my neighborhood was in the direct path of the recent flooding and we were home bound for several days), I agree that more development would put more strain on the already at capacity drainage and sewage lines. Adair (37922), November 9, 2026 at 10:00 AM
Brian
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Brian (37922), November 9, 2026 at 10:33 AM
See attached letter, this will also apply to 11-D-26-PA.Brian (37922), November 9, 2026 at 10:33 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261109103325.pdf
Brian
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Brian (37922), November 9, 2026 at 10:34 AM
Please see attached letter, this also applies to 11-N-26-RZ.Brian (37922), November 9, 2026 at 10:34 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261109103445.pdf
Kim
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Kim (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:15 AM
I strongly oppose the development 8664 S. Northshore Drive (11-N-26-RZ). We have lived in our subdivision for 24 years right off of North Shore Dr. Over the 24 years, the daily traffic on Northshore has become unbearable and not safe. Turning a left at any given time of the day is essentially impossible not to mention a risk to your life; people speed at ridiculous rates on northshore . The area cannot handle any more development at this time. Kim (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:15 AM
Jill
37922
37922
11-A-26-PA
Jill (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:20 AM
Bluegrass/Mourfield road already floods when it rain so what will happen with more asphalt and less ground in that area? Also, it is a congested area with so many houses and more being built just a short distance west of there. The neighborhoods close by would hate to see this field rezoned for a commercial storage facility. It will add more traffic to an already busy road.Jill (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:20 AM
Beth
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Beth (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:35 AM
Please vote against this rezoning request near Tooles Bend Road. This is a very curvy section of Northshore which is a two lane road. The traffic on Northshore has steadily increased in the last five years, and it is often very difficult to make a left turn out of our subdivision. This proposal is for high density housing on very little land and would add to the traffic burden and reduce the beauty of the area.Beth (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:35 AM
Thank you
Lindsey
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Lindsey (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:48 AM
I strongly oppose the proposed rezoning of this property from agricultural to residential. I live in Kensington and this area is already struggling with significant traffic congestion. Adding this level of residential development would increase the strain on infrastructure that is already inadequate.Lindsey (37922), November 9, 2026 at 11:48 AM
The existing road is narrow, winding, and two lanes, with no shoulders, limited turns lanes and a history of accidents. Traffic is heavy, and making turns onto the road is dangerous due to lack of turn lanes and limited visibility. Adding more vehicles to these conditions raises safety concerns for everyone traveling this road.
The area experiences water drainage issues, and further development could worsen flooding and runoff problems. Local schools are operating at or near capacity and additional residential growth would place a greater strain on school facilities, staffing and resources.
The county needs to address the infrastructure, road safety, drainage, and school capacity issues that already exist. Approving higher-density residential use without meaningful improvements would place an unfair burden on residents and create additional safety risks.
I urge the Planning Commission to deny this rezoning request. This area is simply not equipped to accommodate additional residential development in its current condition.
Sean
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Sean (37922), November 9, 2026 at 12:51 PM
Please deny this request for multi-unit housing along Northshore Drive until infrastructure is in place FIRST. The increased population over the last 6 years has created a traffic nightmare moving east and west in the city, and nothing has been done about it. Northshore has too much traffic for a two-lane road, and would need to be widened before any more multi-unit housing can be added. There was a published 5-year plan to expand Northshore to 4 lanes from Western Avenue to Pellissiippi and a 10-year plan to expand from Pellissippi on to Concord Rd. in Farragut. That was published over 20 years ago, and nothing has been done about it. We need better roads throughout the city, and if new developers want to grow their product, they need to cover part of the costs to get the roads in place, and that must come before the new buildings.Sean (37922), November 9, 2026 at 12:51 PM
11-N-26-RZ
B (37922), November 9, 2026 at 3:43 PM
As a concerned resident in the area between Rocky Hill and Ebenezer, I would strongly advise against approval of the proposed development with density. B (37922), November 9, 2026 at 3:43 PM
Northshore Drive already has all-day congestion issues and rush hour commutes only make the situation worse. With young drivers and families driving this roadway daily, the occurrence of wrecks are becoming very commonplace. The challenge lies in entering Northshore Drive with no turn lanes and heavy traffic patterns.
Ashley
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Ashley (37922), November 9, 2026 at 4:26 PM
I strongly urge the Planning Commission to deny the proposed rezoning request on Northshore Drive. My family and I have lived in the Northshore Drive area for 20 years, and we have witnessed a significant increase in traffic congestion and safety concerns as more residential developments continue to be built in the area. Making a left turn out of the Kensington neighborhood has become increasingly difficult and dangerous. Adding more than 130 apartments directly across the street would only intensify the existing traffic problems and create even greater safety risks for residents and commuters. These are valid concerns, as just today a serious accident occurred on Northshore Drive in this exact location, resulting in the closure of both lanes of traffic. Incidents like this are becoming far too frequent. As a parent of teenage drivers, I am genuinely concerned about their safety when they travel on Northshore Drive. The existing infrastructure and road conditions are not equipped to safely accommodate this additional volume of traffic. The safety and well-being of current residents should be a priority when considering further development in this area.I respectfully but strongly ask the Planning Commission to vote NO on this rezoning request. Please consider the impact this development will have on the residents who already travel these roads every day.Ashley (37922), November 9, 2026 at 4:26 PM
John
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
John (37922), November 9, 2026 at 4:26 PM
I request that this be denied and if argued allow for a much lower residential density - RAE - for this proposed area. Northshore is currently not equipped to handle the current traffic loads and this housing density could set a precedent for the remaining undeveloped properties on Northshore Drive further exacerbating an already dangerous and congested area in west Knoxville. Flooding in this area is already an issue and this again would compound the existing problems. John (37922), November 9, 2026 at 4:26 PM
Cynthia
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Cynthia (37922), November 9, 2026 at 5:10 PM
We oppose the rezoning of the property 11-N-26-RZ. We live in a subdivision that is entered/exited onto Northshore. This is just west of the proposed zone revision. Traffic has increased tremendously in the thirteen years we have lived here. It is almost impossible to make a left hand turn out of our subdivision and in fact, extremely difficult to even make a right turn onto Northshore. I oppose the high density neighborhood that would have to feed onto Northshore. Northshore needs more lanes and perhaps roundabouts for the existing subdivision traffic. Infrastructure roadwork needs to be done prior to building more housing units that will contribute to already existing traffic snarls.Cynthia (37922), November 9, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Heather
37922
37922
11-B-26-PA
Heather (37922), November 9, 2026 at 6:26 PM
Any further development of any kind directly off of Northshore is irresponsible at best and dangerous at worst. I live in between 2 sites of proposed development when the infrastructure is already lacking. There are thousands of cars that pass my development each day and it often takes 2-3 minutes to safely pull out of my development. PLEASE STOP building u til you update the infrastructure. Also, can our one truck fire station handle even more residences? Heather (37922), November 9, 2026 at 6:26 PM
Mandy
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Mandy (37922), November 9, 2026 at 8:38 PM
As a resident of the affected area, I am also opposed to this development. I respectfully request that the Commission vote against it.Mandy (37922), November 9, 2026 at 8:38 PM
Jayme
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Jayme (37922), November 10, 2026 at 8:38 AM
The proposed rezoning at 8664 S. Northshore Drive (11-N-26-RZ) raises numerous environmental, infrastructure, and safety concerns. I live less than one mile from this property and share from personal experience. Jayme (37922), November 10, 2026 at 8:38 AM
As others have mentioned, flooding and drainage challenges are a real problem in this area, which should be sufficiently studied and addressed.
This stretch of Northshore is narrow, winding, and shoulder-less in many areas. Visibility is minimal around curves and traffic has drastically increased in just the six years I have lived in this area. Pulling out of our neighborhood onto Northshore is difficult and even dangerous no matter the time of day. I fear at some point, I will always have to turn right and take a detour, or leave 20 minutes early to account for being stuck in my own neighborhood.
What is the proposal to alleviate traffic? Because if it does worsen, we may be forced to move at some point.
David
37922
37922
11-B-26-RZ
David (37922), November 10, 2026 at 9:53 AM
Dear Members of the Knoxville-Knox County Planning Commission,David (37922), November 10, 2026 at 9:53 AM
I am not opposed to responsible growth and development, but I do not believe infrastructure along Northshore Drive is keeping pace with the rapid increase in residential development. Traffic congestion has already exceeded the capacity of the existing roadway, creating daily delays and constant safety concerns for residents.
Before approving additional housing density through rezoning case #11-N-26-RZ, I urge decision-makers to require a comprehensive transportation and roadway improvement plan. Road expansions and infrastructure upgrades should be planned and funded before additional development approvals are granted. Growth is important, but it must occur in a way that ensures our roads and public infrastructure can support it.
John
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
John (37922), November 10, 2026 at 1:41 PM
I've known Jerry and his family for many years and I've lived in the Bluegrass community my whole life. The fact of the matter is that the community that we live in today is nothing like the one we grew up in. Things grow and change over time and that's just the way it is. Every subdivision that has been built on bluegrass road at one time was a part of a farm or vacant land that was sold to build houses. I've talked to Jerry about his plans for the field on bluegrass road and to be honest, I would rather see a boat and RV storage facility than to see more houses or apartments. The property has been in his family for over a hundred years and he wants to keep it in his family. This is a way that he can create revenue without selling to a developer. John (37922), November 10, 2026 at 1:41 PM
Jerry is a good man, he put his name and phone number on this page for people to reach out to him if they have any questions. I would suggest that you do that if you have any concerns. Thanks for your time.
DONALD
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
DONALD (37922), November 10, 2026 at 2:58 PM
I oppose granting this zoning restriction due to Traffic and congestion: Adding 130 residential units to an already heavily traveled section of Northshore Drive could significantly increase traffic congestion and create additional safety concerns. Residents can share their personal experiences with existing traffic conditions. I and my family personally have to deal with exiting on Tools Bend Road onto Northshore, which is already very challenging.DONALD (37922), November 10, 2026 at 2:58 PM
Compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods: Much of the surrounding area consists of lower-density residential development, generally ranging from 3-5 units per acre. A 130-unit development on approximately 11 acres represents a substantially higher density and is not compatible with the character of the surrounding community.
Stormwater runoff and flooding: This section of Northshore already experiences significant drainage and flooding issues. Additional impervious surfaces, including parking lots, roads, and rooftops, could increase stormwater runoff and potentially worsen flooding conditions for neighboring and downstream properties.
Wildlife and environmental impact: Increased development, lighting, and loss of green space could further disrupt wildlife habitats and negatively affect the area's natural environment.
School overcrowding: Local schools are already experiencing capacity challenges, and additional residential development could place further demands on school facilities and resources.
Matt
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Matt (37922), November 10, 2026 at 6:17 PM
The existing infrastructure does NOT support existing traffic, this additional traffic will overwhelm an already bloated system. Matt (37922), November 10, 2026 at 6:17 PM
Garrett
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Garrett (37922), November 10, 2026 at 6:41 PM
Hi my letter is attached in the pdf. Garrett (37922), November 10, 2026 at 6:41 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261110184106.pdf
Robert
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Robert (37922), November 10, 2026 at 8:58 PM
I strongly oppose this. That many homes on each acre will create much more traffic along Northshore. Which is already busy. I live across from the nursery and already an having a difficult time merging onto Northshore because of how busy it is. Robert (37922), November 10, 2026 at 8:58 PM
And I believe this many homes on each acre will negatively affect the property allies around the area. We moved to this area because of the nice neighborhoods surrounding the area, and putting that many homes on each acre will likely spoil the feel of the area. Appears a developer simply wants to make as much money on the development regardless of how it might negatively affect the surrounding area. I will be out of town on November 12. Otherwise I would have attended the meeting to personally oppose this proposal.
Peter
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Peter (37922), November 11, 2026 at 7:15 AM
Property should not be developed at 12 units per acre near a water shed that feeds a wetland without percautions that prevent runoff moving into these areas Peter (37922), November 11, 2026 at 7:15 AM
Property must be developed to hold 10 times the 100 year flood runoff
Property needs mechanisms such as retention ponds and paver based driveways parking areas to retain all runoff on property
12 units per acre is going to have unknown vehicle condition with potential for chemicals entering the wetland areas surounding this property without control of runoff on the property
Please review EPA federal guidelines for property with waterways that lead to wetlands
It is very clear what needs to take place for this dense of a housing development
I recommend single home development to protect the enviroment and meet EPA guidelines for runoff retention on property
Northshore drive is not designed to habdle any additional traffic. This should be studied to determine what locations need stop lights to control flow for the additional capacity Northshore drive will see with this dense of a population housing development. Recommend a traffic engineer submit a report to identify the quantity of traffic lights and locations necessary to support the maximum outflow from the property development
Pamela
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Pamela (37922), November 11, 2026 at 8:17 AM
Please deny Plan Amendment 11-D-26-PA. The proposed development would have a significant negative impact on traffic and the residents who must access the already heavily travelled two lane Northshore Drive. Turning left out of Cottington Court can be dangerous due to impaired sight lines to the right on Northshore and heavy traffic coming from Pellissippi Parkway and traffic coming from the East.Pamela (37922), November 11, 2026 at 8:17 AM
Thank you.
Edward
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Edward (37922), November 11, 2026 at 9:23 AM
South North shore drive is already congested every day this development would only make the issue worse without significant infrastructure improvements this development will be a safety and livability problem. Edward (37922), November 11, 2026 at 9:23 AM
Christopher
37922
37922
11-A-26-DP
Christopher (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:11 AM
To whom it may concern,Christopher (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:11 AM
I couldn't make the hearing today, however a 15-ft setback seems awfully close if this has to do with the empty lot next to our house.
Thank you
Christopher D.
[redacted]
Johnny
37922
37922
11-A-26-RZ
Johnny (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:19 AM
I've known Jerry and his family for many years and I've lived in the Bluegrass community my whole life. The fact of the matter is that the community that we live in today is nothing like the one we grew up in. Things grow and change over time and that's just the way it is. Every subdivision that has been built on bluegrass road at one time was a part of a farm or vacant land that was sold to build houses. I've talked to Jerry about his plans for the field on bluegrass road and to be honest, I would rather see a boat and RV storage facility than to see more houses or apartments. The property has been in his family for over a hundred years and he wants to keep it in his family. This is a way that he can create revenue without selling to a developer.Johnny (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:19 AM
Jerry is a good man, he put his name and phone number on this page for people to reach out to him if they have any questions. I would suggest that you do that if you have any concerns. Thanks for your time.
Lindsay
37922
37922
11-B-26-RZ
Lindsay (37922), November 11, 2026 at 11:03 AM
I'm appalled at the thought of this many homes (which I am now hearing rumors of apartments) being considered for this area of Northshore. I have lived in the Kensington neighborhood for over 10 years and my partner has owned our home for 20 years. The traffic has gotten out of control. There was a midday accident involving 4 vehicles around 130pm on Monday, November 9th. This accident with injuries was close to the area where this new development would be located. I was trying to leave the neighborhood and stuck in traffic for 30 minutes. Traffic was backed up in both directions as far as I could see. Thankfully, it wasn't rush hour. This development would be a nightmare for those already residing in close proximity. This rezoning should in no way be approved. Those considering a rezone should be removed from their position on council. Our neighborhood is highly opposed to this development. This area of Northshore is incredibly tight and already dangerous. Developers need to find another location away from Northshore drive for their dense building plans. Kensington and Whittington Creek neighborhoods pay more than our fair share of (and recently increased) property taxes and are also concerned how a dense development will impact the local schools. Lindsay (37922), November 11, 2026 at 11:03 AM
Erica
37922
37922
11-I-26-RZ
Erica (37922), November 11, 2026 at 11:19 AM
I oppose the re-zoning. These spaces are important to keep agricultural as our areas are becoming more crowded and less balanced. Where does it stop if we don't say no? Erica (37922), November 11, 2026 at 11:19 AM
Kate
37922
37922
11-D-26-PA
Kate (37922), November 11, 2026 at 4:09 PM
We have lived off of Northshore for almost 8 years. In that time traffic has increased drastically. I am strongly opposed to the proposal of a high-density development and would urge you to vote against it. A development of this size and occupancy does not fit the character of the neighborhood, not to mention that the surrounding subdivisions are some of the largest in the area. The small stretch of road in between Ebenezer and Morrell would be pushed to the brink and that includes a dangerous S-curve at Toole's Bend. We have lived in multiple different states and have seen how putting infrastructure ahead of development makes a huge difference on the end result of a community. When voting please consider everything people have listed and especially the safety and well-being of the community where this is being proposed.Kate (37922), November 11, 2026 at 4:09 PM
Luke
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Luke (37922), November 11, 2026 at 4:11 PM
My family firmly opposes this development request. In addition to increasing strain on roads, the risk of increased flooding which will leave folks in Whittington Creek stranded is irresponsible. Add in the increased risk of accidents and the struggle to get emergency crews to scenes, it could be truly life altering for many folks in the area. This would also likely hurt property values as the area becomes more congested and dangerous. Luke (37922), November 11, 2026 at 4:11 PM
Kori
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Kori (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:01 PM
I am against the rezoning for more residential housing along Northshore. This area already is very congested and difficult to get out of neighborhood safely. Kori (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:01 PM
Jerry
37922
37922
11-N-26-RZ
Jerry (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:04 PM
Dear Members of the Knoxville/Knox County Planning Commission:Jerry (37922), November 11, 2026 at 10:04 PM
My wife and I are writing to express our strong opposition to the plan amendment and rezoning requested under Case 11-N-26-RZ. We have significant reservations about the developer's proposal for the reasons outlined in the accompanying PDF.
Thanks for your consideration.
Jerry and Eleesa Epps
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20261111220419.pdf