June 11, 2026
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

6 Comments for
X ZIP Code
Julia
37918
5-A-26-DP
Julia (37918), May 6, 2026 at 5:24 PM
Hi. My name is Julia M. I live in Hidden Brook subdivision. My property backs up to the property that is proposed for townhome development. I am very concerned about our property value, traffic and scenery if this moves forward. I ask you to please consider not allowing this development. Due to the heavy traffic that we already have on East Beaver Creek and how hard it is to turn out of our subdivision now. I also don't want this to decrease our homes property value. We love having our backyard with the trees and the undeveloped land for the birds and the wildlife and serenity. If this has to be developed, please lower the number of town homes that are being considered. I also request that the developer leave a tree line between our properties in Hidden Brook subdivision that are on Hannah Brook Rd and Berkford Rd to help keep some serenity and not disturb all of the wildlife in the area.
Kevin
37918
4-A-26-OB
Kevin (37918), May 11, 2026 at 1:11 PM
Knox Community Planning Alliance agrees and concurs with the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group request to postpone so they can continue to work with the developer on this project.
Kent
37918
4-A-26-OB
Kent (37918), May 11, 2026 at 1:47 PM
I love that South Knoxville continues to grow through commercial and residential development. However, from what I've seen, it does not appear that there is anywhere close to adequate parking allotted for this particular development. Until someone can solve that issue (which is already a massive issue along Sevier Ave), I am not in favor of the development.
Further congestion without solutions is not a net win for the Old Sevier community.
Melanie
37918
4-A-26-OB
Melanie (37918), May 12, 2026 at 11:05 AM
I am writing in support of residential development at 315 Kerbela Ave, while raising specific concerns about the adequacy of the parking and traffic flow provisions in the current proposal.

The plan proposes 228-235 parking spaces for 217-223 residential units, approximately one space per unit. This ratio does not appear to account for visitor parking or real-world usage patterns, and the plan does not include a traffic or parking demand study to support these numbers. The shortfall in on-site parking will likely push resident and visitor vehicles onto the surrounding neighborhood streets.

This is a particular concern for Dawson St., where City Church Knoxville operates a parking lot that serves families with young children on Sunday mornings and throughout the week. The entrance to that lot is on Dawson St., and increased cut-through traffic or competition for street parking in this area would directly affect safe access for families dropping off and picking up children.

The transportation diagram also does not clearly address how traffic will flow to and from the site during peak hours, nor how delivery vehicles, moving trucks, and emergency access will be managed given the grade changes and limited street widths in this corridor.

We would ask that the planning commission require a traffic impact study and parking demand analysis as conditions of approval, with particular attention to the impact on Dawson St. and adjacent residential streets.
Rachel
37918
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37918), May 13, 2026 at 7:06 PM
We dont need more apartment complexes here! The traffic is already bad enough. People keep promising responsible growth, this isn't really responsible growth. The infrastructure cant even take it as it is. This needs to stop.
Kevin
37918
6-SB-26-C
Kevin (37918), June 8, 2026 at 10:48 AM
This is yet another thermometer subdivision. Where is the stub-out or connectivity that is strongly encouraged by the Knoxville Knox County subdivision regulations and by the County's Comprehensive Land Use Plan?