November 12, 2020
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

18 Comments for
X DateX ZIP Code
Case Number
Name
Comment
Attachment
On Behalf Of
Date
11-A-20-SP
Rita
37932
11-A-20-SP
Rita (37932), November 3, 2020 at 1:13 AM
I am a next door neighbor who lives at 1801 N. Campbell Station Rd. and am writing in opposition to the rezoning of the Long Farm Way portion of the 41 acre parcel of this property. The original plan was meant to be a low density area with no more than 15 or more acres per house and only 2 houses per easement. This plan has been a known restriction that was put in place when the Long Farm was subdivided to protect the land and surrounding neighbors from a high density development.

The developers are trying to get around the restrictions by accessing it through the adjacent property and we think allowing this large development will set a dangerous precedent and be unfair to the other Long Farm lot owners. Also, the large curve would be even more dangerous with the new entrance/exit point there ,causing increased number of speed signage and increased traffic problems. Please consider our opposition to the rezoning of this development and keep the restriction of this large development.
November 3, 2020
at 1:13 AM
11-C-20-RZ
Kim
37932
11-C-20-RZ
Kim (37932), November 5, 2020 at 12:15 PM
The developer reached out to me to discuss his vision for this project several weeks ago. We discussed at length the concerns that adjacent property owners and community members had regarding the safety of Campbell Station Rd, density according to topography, setbacks, amenities, adding value to the community, aligning his vision with the community's vision, the Growth Plan, the Sector Plan, the case file of this property, easement deeds, other offers on this property, preservation of vegetation, buffers, egress / ingress locations, site distances, zoning and densities of nearby properties, etc.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20201105131522.pdf
November 5, 2020
at 12:15 PM
11-I-20-RZ
Kim
37932
11-I-20-RZ
Kim (37932), November 5, 2020 at 12:16 PM
First a little history - nearly 7 years ago when our group was advocating for the addition of a middle school in the NW Sector, we also strongly encouraged our county to consider the growth in our area and plan ahead by including an additional elementary school in this sector of our county into the 5 year capital plan. The new proposed NW Elementary School is underway and planned for Coward Mill Rd. The site selection for the school was vetted after KCS secured a purchase agreement of the parcel. Therefore, major infrastructure improvement costs, including improvements to Coward Mill Rd and extending Cherahala Rd, were bumped up on the county's list of priorities. As you might conclude, the financial burden for these improvements is significant, but necessary, as plans for the school move forward. As a result, the existing residents of Coward Mill Rd (most of which are long time, second and third generation) land owners have concerns. Last week I met with a group of community members to hear those concerns: traffic congestion and safety, easements, density, long term planning and future growth. I have spoken to the applicant and relayed these concerns to which he is taking into consideration. The community would like to see a density of 3 or less, which aligns with other developments nearby who have densities at 3.5, 1-3,1-3, and 1-3.5. The applicant is awaiting a determination from his engineer and I am awaiting the staff recommendation to determine how to bring the applicant and community members together.
November 5, 2020
at 12:16 PM
11-B-20-UR
Kim
37932
11-B-20-UR
Kim (37932), November 5, 2020 at 12:17 PM
Upon meeting with another group of residents on Coward Mill Rd, it was determined that these resident were unaware that the zoning of this property was heard and determined at the October 8th planning meeting with a zoning of LDR 3.5 du/acre. Which supports the need to better the notification process as our group has stated multiple times - the current timeline for notification and methods are simply inadequate and place unrealistic time constraints directly on the community. After a lengthy discussion of the criteria used by the Planning Commission to conclude their decision, the residents were more understanding and willing to talk with the applicant on possible concept plan design conditions. Discussions are underway.
November 5, 2020
at 12:17 PM
11-G-20-UR
Kim
37932
11-G-20-UR
Kim (37932), November 6, 2020 at 2:32 PM
I wanted to ask that the proposed impact of traffic congestion be considered when reviewing this application. Hardin Valley is excited that the applicant requested community input for the best and highest use of this land and responded favorably with the much needed addition of a childcare facility in our area. However, we do have concerns regarding the traffic patterns and or congestion that will directly correlate with high traffic count times of the day as indicated in the 2019 HV Traffic Mobility Study. We simply ask that you consider and suggest reasonable solutions to mediate this concern.
November 6, 2020
at 2:32 PM
11-G-20-UR
Hardin Valley Planning Advocates
37932
11-G-20-UR
Hardin Valley Planning Advocates (37932), November 6, 2020 at 2:50 PM
Dear Commissioners, I wanted to ask that the proposed impact of traffic congestion be considered when reviewing this application. Hardin Valley is excited that the applicant requested community input for the best and highest use of this land and responded favorably with the much needed addition of a childcare facility in our area. However, we do have concerns regarding the traffic patterns and or congestion that will directly correlate with high traffic count times of the day as indicated in the 2019 HV Traffic Mobility Study. We simply ask that you consider and suggest reasonable solutions to mediate this concern.
November 6, 2020
at 2:50 PM
11-A-20-SP
Ed and Laura
37932
11-A-20-SP
Ed and Laura (37932), November 6, 2020 at 6:11 PM
This email is in regard to the proposed planned residential rezoning project proposed by Urban Development on Campbell Station rd at Catoga kennels.

As a resident of this area (11707 Yarnell Rd) my husband and I strongly oppose any further development of this magnitude until Campbell station rd sees significant improvement.

Specifically the dangerous interaction of Yarnell and Campbell Sta and the increased traffic at Camp Sta and Hardin Valley. These intersections need a traffic circle or light before any future development occurs.
November 6, 2020
at 6:11 PM
11-A-20-SP
Martin and Mary Lou
37932
11-A-20-SP
Martin and Mary Lou (37932), November 9, 2020 at 12:07 PM
We are very concerned about a proposal to allow building 196 new homes on 1737 N. Campbell Station. We understand the desire to build in Hardin Valley and are not opposed to all new building, but ask that it be thoughtful and proactive. Many homes in this area are already in the process of being built or have been built and not occupied. Our schools are already overcrowded. This area is experiencing traffic issues and congestion which would obviously get worse. Traffic would increase by 1,932 more trips a day according to the Traffic Impact Letter completed October 2020. Campbell Station and Yarnell are both 2 lane roads (often narrow) and cannot handle this amount of traffic. We simply do not have the infrastructure.

Your own staff has made a preliminary recommendation for 124 homes. What would be your rationale for going against this finding? We ask that you follow the guidelines for Hillside Protection. Please give thought to the impact on the environment, both trees and wildlife. We are at risk of diminishing both which are reasons why Hardin Valley is beautiful.

We regret that health issues and Covid 19 prohibit our attending this meeting in person.

PLEASE be thoughtful and proactive in your decisions regarding Hardin Valley. Please send confirmation that this email has been received-thanks.
November 9, 2020
at 12:07 PM
11-C-20-RZ
Samuel
37932
11-C-20-RZ
Samuel (37932), November 9, 2020 at 7:03 PM
I just wanted to voice my family's concern regarding rezoning this property. Having moved to Hardin Valley in 2012, we've witnessed first hand the growth the community has both enjoyed and is now having to learn to tolerate. Traffic along Campbell Station, and specifically at the Yarnell intersection, is a daily problem. It would be prudent to delay further land development so as to allow the surrounding roadways to catch up. I'm also concerned about the population density and home values. We moved to a rural part of Knoxville for a reason, because it was rural, and not with the hope that it would someday soon be further developed and over populated. When will enough be enough? Just look at the development that has already (and is currently) taking place. Let's postpone rezoning for more development until, at least, the infrastructure/roadways have a chance to catch up. Thanks for your time.
November 9, 2020
at 7:03 PM
11-C-20-RZ
Ryan
37932
11-C-20-RZ
Ryan (37932), November 9, 2020 at 7:10 PM
The fact that a portion of this property had previously been rezoned to low density residential should have no bearing on the current rezoning request. This was 14 years ago and obviously a lot has changed since then with regards to the growth and infrastructure and planning. All of the surrounding properties in this area are agricultural or rural residential with densities at one house per acre up to 1 house per 20 or more acres. Approving this rezoning would be inconsistent and significantly effect the adjoining properties, not only in terms of land use but property value. Also, with a large development, all who live in the area will have their safety at our homes and on the road irreversibly changed.please deny this rezoning, this is not a good location for a large development.
November 9, 2020
at 7:10 PM
11-D-20-RZ
Marcie
37932
11-D-20-RZ
Marcie (37932), November 10, 2020 at 10:44 AM
I am highly discouraged to see the potential of rezoning from agricultural to residential. I live at the intersection of yarnell and Campbell station and my son attends Hardin Valley Elementary. We moved to Hardin Valley to actually SEE some green and you are allowing the filling of homes for tax dollars without the consideration of WHY people moved here in the first place. Campbell Station road is a disaster already and the schools are over filled and having to use pods. I sincerely hope before you look at the simple dollar amount you will consider how this effects all of us who live here. I live at 1521 Misty Valley Way and frequent Campbell station- i am appalled it is even being considered to add 200 homes and traffic to this already disastrous road. The Yarnell intersection is scary as it is. You need to catch up with infrastructure (roads and schools) before you add one more home to this place- it’s getting ridiculous.
November 10, 2020
at 10:44 AM
11-D-20-RZ
Charles
37932
11-D-20-RZ
Charles (37932), November 10, 2020 at 2:44 PM
The Commission should reject the rezoning for this Subdivision. The infrastructure in Hardin Valley can’t stand any more traffic. People are going to be killed at the intersection of Yarnell Road and Campbell Station Road and at the intersection of Campbell Station Road and Hardin Valley Road. Mud will gush down the ridge onto Yarnell Road. Please don’t be irresponsible and approve this subdivision rezoning.
November 10, 2020
at 2:44 PM
11-C-20-RZ
Travis & Stacey
37932
11-C-20-RZ
Travis & Stacey (37932), November 10, 2020 at 3:16 PM
I’m writing in regard to to another proposed subdivision in the Hardin Valley area. I’ve been growing more and more concerned with the density of homes in the newer subdivisions that have been springing up over the past few years and now they’ve started to encroach on our small, wooded property where we lived since 2015. In addition to the impacts on privacy and the natural beauty still largely present in the area, traffic on N. Campbell Station & Yarnell will become even more problematic as the number of residents goes up at break neck pace. Please consider pumping the brakes on this new development that sits right in the middle of some beautiful countryside.
November 10, 2020
at 3:16 PM
11-A-20-SP
Misty
37932
11-A-20-SP
Misty (37932), November 11, 2020 at 7:18 AM
Please do not approve 196 unit subdivision on Campbell Station. Campbell Station Rd cannot handle an increase in cars. Just the other day there was a really bad wreck in that curve where the entrance of that subdivision would be. The schools are already overcrowded.
November 11, 2020
at 7:18 AM
11-A-20-SP
Jennifer
37932
11-A-20-SP
Jennifer (37932), November 11, 2020 at 11:20 AM
Attached please find our letter of opposition for case #11-A-20-SP and case #11-C-20-RZ. We have multiple concerns regarding this location and these specific parcels. Thank you for your consideration.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20201111112005.pdf
November 11, 2020
at 11:20 AM
11-C-20-RZ
John
37932
11-C-20-RZ
John (37932), November 11, 2020 at 12:26 PM
I object to the further development of Campbell Station Rd in Knoxville at this time. This road is not designed to handle the additional traffic flow that it must for the current development. In addition, the surrounding roads cannot support the additional traffic without greatly impacting the current residents. Lastly, the Hardin Valley schools are already dealing with overcrowded situations. The addition of 100+ more families will only exacerbate this issue. I feel it is time for the county to deal with some of these outlying issues prior to allow these developers carte blanche to squeeze homes in where ever open land may be. They have no investment in the Hardin Valley environment after they've completed their builds and this is where we, the residents, need our local government officials to stand up for what's best for us.
November 11, 2020
at 12:26 PM
11-C-20-RZ
Jennifer
37932
11-C-20-RZ
Jennifer (37932), November 11, 2020 at 12:28 PM
I object to the further development of Campbell Station Rd in Knoxville at this time. This road is not designed to handle the additional traffic flow that it must for the current development. In addition, the surrounding roads cannot support the additional traffic without greatly impacting the current residents. Lastly, the Hardin Valley schools are already dealing with overcrowded situations. The addition of 100+ more families will only exacerbate this issue. I feel it is time for the county to deal with some of these outlying issues prior to allow these developers carte blanche to squeeze homes in wherever open land may be. They have no investment in the Hardin Valley environment after they've completed their builds and this is where we, the residents, need our local government officials to stand up for what's best for us.
November 11, 2020
at 12:28 PM
11-A-20-SP
Carol
37932
11-A-20-SP
Carol (37932), November 11, 2020 at 2:36 PM
My husband and I are totally opposed to this proposal for Long Farm Way. Our valley continues to be over come by massive neighborhoods. The environmental impact to our creek, hills, and wildlife continues to be compromised, the schools are heavily overcrowded already. The roads continue to be carrying way too much traffic for the amount of homes being allowed to be built. We have lived here 18 years the traffic and creek have both been affected by building up excess homes and even homes being built on flood property built up higher to accommodate large amounts of housing to overrun our valley. The roads as they are are not safe for one more large housing development to come in this valley. We are sure you will take all these points and make the best decision for our County. Please consider not bringing in more money for peoples gain but, what is the right thing to do. Please Stop this from happening. We look forward to your reply as to the decision made.
November 11, 2020
at 2:36 PM