5-H-22-RZ Nancy (37932), April 25, 2022 at 2:09 PM
We got a card in the mail about the rezoning for 5-H-22-RZ at the May meeting. My question is when will the site plan be determined? Specifically will they try to connect the tip of this new office property to the residential Berrywood? Can a restriction be placed that they will not tie the back of this property into Berrywood?
Berrywood is already challenging at Hardin Valley Road having two subdivisions coming onto HVR from either other side - leading to unsafe pullout from all three subdivisions onto Hardin Valley. Allowing a connection at the upper end of Berrywood to allow more traffic on this out-of-code road (steepness and slant) would even further reduce safety.
Such a restriction against extending Berrywood was supposed to be put in place after the site plan for the apartments was approved years ago, but I do not know if this was ever done.
5-H-22-UR Sheila and Ordal (37849), April 25, 2022 at 2:36 PM
Our concerns regarding this development include increased traffic on a narrow winding road with limited sight in several areas and with the flooding problems. I spoke with Mr. Bansler and he will address the HUD housing question. This is an older established subdivision and rental properties do not mesh with our area. We have lived here for 26 years and have enjoyed the area and we do not want to see more traffic. We have lots of cars that cut thru on Irwin from Central to Oakmead and on to Beaver Creek. I feel a traffic count should be done not only for the increased housing but for all the traffic on this road. This would give an accurate account of the traffic problems. Please consider the residents quality of life before approving this. Thank You!
5-E-22-RZ Kelsey (37932), April 27, 2022 at 8:06 AM
Please do not approve this request for another Planned Residential in Hardin Valley. There have already been so many new neighborhoods built and there are so many in the process of being built. Hardin Valley needs a park and walking trails, not another neighborhood. Traffic is already terrible and the schools are already full. This land should be used for a park or trails. By approving this, you will be taking away another part of what makes Hardin Valley special. Please consider those who already live there and the implications this will have on us.
5-C-22-SP CHARLES (37932), May 2, 2022 at 11:09 AM
A minimum 50 ft x 20 ft high greenway bordering all Chestnut Grove property. All wildlife should be rescued and relocated prior to development. Preserve as much of the natural trees and landscape as possible. Development should be commensurate with bordering property.
I am not again progress or building, as long as it brings a value to our community. Questions: 1-What is the value add to build either town homes or homes on a small lot? 2- Lake Cove subdivision would like to see a big tree buffer added between the properties. Can that happen at the beginning of the project and not the end. It helps with huge dust storm from trucks. 3- Also Lake Cove would like to see the entrance to your property a good distance from ours to avoid any accidents of cars turning into each other. 4- Once again, how will you address the dust problem during construction. When the wind blows from the south (85% of the time). It carries the dirt and dust right into Lake Cove subdivision. It happen with the building of The Woods at Chick by Ball Homes. 5- Lots 1-4, in Lake Cove, would like to have a fence and tree buffer. That will be key to the value of these homes.
We hope which ever company builds there, will be sensitive to the adjoining lots in Lake Cove.
I see the areas to guard against the numerous sinkholes . I am inquiring about the drainage issues. The large drainage pipe for all the interstate runoff that keeps 1/3 of this property flooded 7 months of the year ! Where is the water to be routed to now ?
Please widen Hardin Valley road and increase school capacity before approving more rezonings and development in Hardin Valley, especially this application, which is right at a huge trouble spot.
Because of the painful current overcrowding in Hardin Valley, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that this application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered.
If the planning commission decides to change the zoning for this application, please put binding requirements in the motion that the developers actually have to follow for the good of Hardin Valley and the surrounding neighborhoods. On rezoning, please require at least:
The protection of the steep hillsides on about a third of this land, require leaving the forest, vegetation, and wildlife there.
Require similar density, housing design, and price points to surrounding neighborhoods, such as Chestnut Grove (which surrounds much of this land).
The creation of a buffer zone from existing housing developments using the existing mature trees and vegetation.
Because of the painful current overcrowding in Hardin Valley, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that this application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered.
If the planning commission decides to change the zoning for this application, please put binding requirements in the motion that the developers actually have to follow for the good of Hardin Valley and the surrounding neighborhoods. On rezoning, please require at least:
The protection of the steep hillsides on about a third of this land, require leaving the forest, vegetation, and wildlife there.
Require similar density, housing design, and price points to surrounding neighborhoods, such as Chestnut Grove (which surrounds much of this land).
The creation of a buffer zone from existing housing developments using the existing mature trees and vegetation.
5-C-22-SP Charlotte (37932), May 3, 2022 at 1:46 PM
Buffer of sufficient feet from existing lot lines · Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature trees and vegetation within the buffer zone · Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model · Install additional natural vegetation buffer for height and decrease visibility · Preserve property values and aesthetics · Regulation of fencing for type and consistency · Housing design and price points consistent with Chestnut Grove
5-E-22-RZ Charlotte (37932), May 3, 2022 at 1:48 PM
Community-wide concerns and infrastructure needs: · Traffic Safety – need for a west-bound turning lane at the development · Traffic Safety – need for a pedestrian walkway/access, sidewalks, and crosswalk at Hardin Valley Road · Increased traffic volume and entrance/exit on Hardin Valley Road at the schools, · Implementation of traffic calming mechanisms · Road frontage buffer of sufficient feet for community aesthetics and pedestrian safety · Wetland preservation: blue-line streams, multiple active springs, marshy area with cattails · Wildlife disturbance and impact: turkeys, deer, racoons, opossum, hawks, owls, songbirds, flying squirrels · Need for public park, recreational areas, and green space, greenways · Comply with the Knox County Northwest Sector Plan · Forest preservation/reforestation/ old growth trees · Impact on school capacity · Storm water runoff · Alignment with surrounding property development like Chestnut Grove · Utility impact: demand on water & water pressure, electricity and gas Thank you for your consideration of the above in making rezoning decisions.
Lived in Chestnut Grove for 35 years watching traffic increase substantially with no particular county improvements. Hardin Valley with increased commercial and residential along with increased traffic issues, Requesting on the adjacent 58 acre development coming before your Planning Commission the following considerations: Forest preservation ( no clear cutting) -keep old trees and vegetation. Protect wildlife (turkey population, along with deer , raccoon) Possibly an Albino squirrel group. Preserve property values aesthetics with housing design restrictions. Because of above concerns ,I would request the current zoning regulations remain in affect-request for a rezoning be denied with no other zoning options considered.
Property owner in Chestnut Grove for 35 years. Not much change to county infrastructure just increased traffic. Concerned about 58 acres considered for development off Hardin Valley Road. Current zoning designation needs to remain in place. Application for rezoning needs to be denied. Increased density more that one dwelling per acre is essential to preservation of the forest ,vegetation needs to stay to protect watershed and green space. Also protection of wildlife needs to be considered . The land in question has been forest and farmland for last 100 years. Please consider good stewardship of our the Hardin Valley area not just concrete and development.
The density in this area by all homeowners are over 1-6/acre. The only existing development is 11/2/acre. The adjacent property density has not been approved by county commission and road visibility has 400ft plus guard rail with zoning sign attached because no place for sign around curve. Very dangerous. Please deny this density.
5-E-22-RZ Kathleen (37932), May 4, 2022 at 9:22 AM
Chestnut Grove specific concerns: · Buffer of sufficient feet from existing lot lines · Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature trees and vegetation within the buffer zone · Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model · Install additional natural vegetation buffer for height and decrease visibility · Preserve property values and aesthetics · Regulation of fencing for type and consistency · Housing design and price points consistent with Chestnut Grove "Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above."
A poor development could adversely affect property values in Chestnut Grove.
Due to these concerns and issues, I request the current zoning remain unchanged and that no other zoning options be considered. However, if the Planning Commission decides a zoning change is appropriate, I request the decision comport with the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, and give due consideration to the recommendations from other property owners/residents of Chestnut Grove. Thank you.
5-E-22-RZ Margaret (37932), May 4, 2022 at 6:12 PM
I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE REZONING DUE TO ITS IMPACT ON INCREASED TRAFFIC, SCHOOL OVERCROWDING, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON WILDLIFE , FOREST, MARSHLAND, THREE SPRINGS AND CREEKS, HILLSIDE POTENTIAL DESTRUCTION. WE HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD BUILT IN A WAY TO CONSERVE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT AND DO NOT WANT THIS DAMAGED. WE WOULD LIKE AN ADEQUATE BUFFER FROM UR NEIGHBORHOOD TO PRROTECTEXISTING FOREST, VEGETATION AND NATRUAL MOVEMETN OF WILDLIFE ( INCLUDING DEER, TURKEY (GAGGLE OF UP TO 22 SEEN IN OUR YARD), FOX, BIRDS (3 TYPES OF WOODPECKERS, HAWKS, BLUEBIRD AND MANY MORE). Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above."
I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE REZONING DUE TO ITS IMPACT ON INCREASED TRAFFIC, SCHOOL OVERCROWDING, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON WILDLIFE , FOREST, MARSHLAND, THREE SPRINGS AND CREEKS, HILLSIDE POTENTIAL DESTRUCTION. WE HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD BUILT IN A WAY TO CONSERVE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT AND DO NOT WANT THIS DAMAGED. WE WOULD LIKE AN ADEQUATE BUFFER FROM UR NEIGHBORHOOD TO PRROTECTEXISTING FOREST, VEGETATION AND NATRUAL MOVEMETN OF WILDLIFE ( INCLUDING DEER, TURKEY (GAGGLE OF UP TO 22 SEEN IN OUR YARD), FOX, BIRDS (3 TYPES OF WOODPECKERS, HAWKS, BLUEBIRD AND MANY MORE). Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above."
I am opposed to rezoning and developing this approximately 58 acres on Hardin Valley Road. The development of Hardin Valley has proceeded at an incredibly a rapid pace. If you go to the Knox County Planning website and search on Hardin Valley, an excess of applications to develop land into housing developments can be found. Visiting the staff reports allows citizens to read the comments by neighbors living in the same area. Very few if any support the development citing overcrowding of the schools and lack of infrastructure that relate to traffic and drainage issues. And yet many of these requests are approved. It appears the citizen’s voices, those who have children in these overcrowded schools and drive these roads daily are not being considered. Why is that? Why are we not given a voice in the planning of our own neighborhood? I understand there is a housing crisis and I do not want to be a “not in my backyard” type person, but a person that says “yes, in my backyard” but that takes a community planning together with a long term vision. Please consider the voice of the citizens that reside in Hardin Valley before approving this new development with close to 200 new dwelling units built by Homestead Land Holdings, LLC.
In regards to the rezoning request for this property, as a resident of Chestnut Grove which is adjacent to this property, I have the following concerns and am opposed to this request: Buffer of sufficient feet from existing lot lines Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature tree and vegetation within the buffer zone Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model Install additional natural vegetation buffer for height and decrease visibility Preserve property values and aesthetics Regulation of fencing for types and consistency Housing design and price points consistent with Chestnut Grove
Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above.
5-C-22-SP Michael (37932), May 5, 2022 at 10:51 AM
Please deny this request for rezoning. There are wetlands on this land that needs to be protected. Wetlands are valuable habitat for native plants and wildlife. If you add this development, how are you going to protect those wetlands and the wildlife that lives there? It's important to conserve the natural wildlife and trees for people to live healthy lives. What are your plans for the overcrowding in the schools? What are your plans for the runoff from development? What are your plans for sustaining natural habitats? The forest needs to be kept. The hillside needs to be protected. This land has been forest and farmland for years. It's not built for a development. Please vote NO to rezoning this land.
Our family has many concerns regarding this matter, but I will condense them for this comment: First, development of this property will ravage the local wildlife as the majority of this property is wooded and old growth forest. Second, this development would be right in front of our local schools, where there is already too much traffic and congestion. Kids walk this area and my five children, in particular, run up and down Hardin Valley Road for cross country. Third, the rezoning sought would stand out negatively in the area, which is more rural. For example, the primary development that directly abuts this property (chestnut grove) is a planned neighborhood where every house sits on 1-3 acres. Fourth, rezoning and development would present significant issues for storm water runoff. Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, and the existing development bordering most of the proposed property (i.e., Chestnut Grove).
5-E-22-RZ Glenn and Angie (37932), May 5, 2022 at 3:09 PM
Thank you for your service in planning for our community's needs, coherence, and the preservation of its unique natural character. Attached are our concerns for the sector plan and rezoning in Hardin Valley. Because of these concerns, we request that the current zoning remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, we request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, existing developments bordering this property and the attached recommendations.
· Buffer of sufficient feet from existing lot lines · Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature trees and vegetation within the buffer zone · Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model · Install additional natural vegetation buffer for height and decrease visibility · Preserve property values and aesthetics · Regulation of fencing for type and consistency · Housing design and price points consistent with Chestnut Grove
"Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above."
*additional comments from my previous response *My husband and I have lived in Chestnut Grove Subdivision 32 years. Many years ago we purchased from the Asbury Family about 6 acres directly behind our home for the purpose of preserving the wildlife and natural habitat. *Several years ago, after researching Hardin Valley property values, my husband and I along with other Chestnut Grove Homeowners made a serious, substantial offer to purchase the 58 acres which is up for rezoning that our neighborhood borders. *The offer had a clause in it stating that we would not sell the property for development but would keep it in its natural state and agricultural zoning *The owners of the property would not entertain our offer not would they tell us what it would take to purchase the property. *Humanity has the privilege of being responsible for all creatures and landscapes. It is the responsibility of Knox County to preserve this privilege and the property and wildlife associated with it. *We plead with you to not rezone this property *If the property is unable to avoid rezoning, then we plead that you follow guidelines I submitted in my previous response.
Please consider keeping this property zoned agricultural Keep the current zoning as agricultural. Vegetative plants are important for wildlife like wild turkeys, red foxes, owls and raccoons A nature walk by the creek would help wildlife and provide green space . A 500 foot buffer between Chestnut Grove and the new development would offer important protection for wildlife . A buffer would provide green space for Chestnut Grove and the new development
5-E-22-RZ Patricia (37932), May 5, 2022 at 9:06 PM
My concerns about the rezoning of this property on Harden Valley Road: The increase in the traffic congestion around the schools, the impact on the school capacity, the impact on demands for utilities, stormwater runoff, and wildlife disturbance.
Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above."
5-C-22-SP Louis K (37932), May 5, 2022 at 10:01 PM
I request that the Planning Commission ensure that the proposed building project on the present agricultural land of approximately 58 acres be in harmony with the existing Chestnut Grove subdivision. The proposed new subdivision shares an extensive L-shaped boundary with Chestnut Grove. Therefore, it would in essence be an extension of the current subdivision. Chestnut Grove has a density of fewer than one home per acre and is substantially wooded with majestic mature trees. The area serves as home to a large diversity of birds and land wildlife. These attributes add economic and aesthetic value to this part of Knox County, which could be maintained and enhanced by requiring similar values in development of the adjacent agricultural land.
-density of one home per acre -do not remove large trees -steep hillside on this site should not be built
5-E-22-RZ Tim & Teresa (37932), May 5, 2022 at 10:01 PM
·Traffic Safety. need west-bound turn lane at development, walkway/sidewalks, crosswalk at Hardin Valley ·Increased traffic vol. at entrance/exit on at the schools, ·Impact on school capacity · Forest preservation ·Demand on water, electric, gas ·Buffer from existing lot lines ·Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature trees/veg. w/in buffer zone ·Need to keep forest as a part of green space. Use Chestnut Grove as model ·Install add. natural vegetation buffer for height/decrease visibility ·Preserve property values/aesthetics ·Reg. of fencing for type/consistency ·Housing design/price consistent with Chestnut Grove
In summary, we request that current zoning remain and that application for rezoning be denied. We request that no other zoning options be considered. If the commission decides to re-zone, then we request that it be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most of the proposed site and the other concerns listed above
5-E-22-RZ Louis K (37932), May 5, 2022 at 10:23 PM
I request that the Planning Commission ensure that the proposed building project on the present agricultural land of approximately 58 acres be in harmony with the existing Chestnut Grove subdivision. The proposed new subdivision shares an extensive L-shaped boundary with Chestnut Grove. Therefore, it would in essence be an extension of the current subdivision. Chestnut Grove has a density of fewer than one home per acre and is substantially wooded with majestic mature trees. The area serves as home to a large diversity of birds and land wildlife. These attributes add economic and aesthetic value to this part of Knox County, which could be maintained and enhanced by requiring similar values in development of the adjacent agricultural land.
I request that rezoning of this land be denied. If the Planning Commission decides to approving rezoning, please consider the following requests -density of one home per acre -do not remove large trees -steep hillside on this site should not be built
5-E-22-RZ Russell (37932), May 6, 2022 at 12:41 AM
Please see the attached PDF file with my family's concerns.
Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above.
Road frontage buffer of sufficient feet for community aesthetics and pedestrian safety Wetland preservation Wildlife disturbance and impact: turkeys, deer, racoons, opossum, hawks, owls, songbirds, flying squirrels Need for public park, recreational areas, and green space, greenways Comply with the Knox County Northwest Sector Plan Forest preservation/reforestation Impact on school capacity Storm water runoff Alignment with surrounding property development like Chestnut Grove Utility impact: demand on water & water pressure, electricity and gas
Chestnut Grove specific concerns: Buffer of sufficient feet from existing lot lines Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature tree and vegetation within the buffer zone Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model Install additional natural vegetation buffer for height and decrease visibility Regulation of fencing for types and consistency Housing design and price points consistent with Chestnut Grove
Traffic Safety – need for a west-bound turning lane at the development Traffic Safety – need for a pedestrian walkway/access, sidewalks, and crosswalk at Hardin Valley Road Increased traffic volume and entrance/exit on Hardin Valley Road at the schools Implementation of traffic calming mechanisms Road frontage buffer of sufficient feet for community aesthetics and pedestrian safety Wetland preservation Wildlife disturbance and impact: turkeys, deer, racoons, opossum, hawks, owls, songbirds, flying squirrels Need for public park, recreational areas, and green space, greenways Comply with the Knox County Northwest Sector Plan Forest preservation/reforestation Impact on school capacity Storm water runoff Alignment with surrounding property development like Chestnut Grove Utility impact: demand on water & water pressure, electricity and gas
Chestnut Grove specific concerns: Buffer of sufficient feet from existing lot lines Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature tree and vegetation within the buffer zone Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model Install additional natural vegetation buffer for height and decrease visibility Preserve property values and aesthetics Regulation of fencing for types and consistency Housing design and price points consistent with Chestnut Grove
Please don't allow this land to be rezoned, the zoning needs to remain as-is. We are very concerned about the proposed development: · Wetland preservation: blue-line streams, multiple active springs, marshy area with cattails · Wildlife disturbance and impact: turkeys, deer, racoons, opossum, hawks, owls, songbirds, flying squirrels. · Comply with the Knox County Northwest Sector Plan · Forest preservation/reforestation/ old growth trees · Alignment with surrounding property development like Chestnut Grove · Vegetation buffer: cannot remove mature trees and vegetation within the buffer zone · Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model · No more than one home should be allowed per usable acre. Because of these concerns and issues, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above.
We are opposing the zoning change on Hardin Valley road from agriculture to low density housing. - We would like to see the county follow the Northwest Sector Plan. - Hardin Valley Elementary is already overcrowded having to bring in portable classrooms, some enrichment classes, such as art and music, are occurring in the homeroom classroom as the space for teaching their class has been taken over with double classrooms, having 2 teachers in a room with 40 plus students. As these grades move through the Hardin Valley system, the overcrowding issue will only become exacerbated. - Houses are already being built in the Hardin Valley area at a rate of 1 house every 32 hours. The infrastructure of the roads and school cannot handle this. We have been told that the increase in traffic is only from the school traffic. From personal experience of living in the area, I can vouch that is an untrue statement as most days when we are using Valley Vista Road and trying to turn right onto Hardin Valley road, it becomes a near impossible feat anytime between 7a – 6:30p. If I am needing to turn left onto Hardin Valley road, I have to drive down Yarnell road, turn right onto Campbell Station road, then turn right onto Hardin Valley road to safely and timely arrive at my destination in that area. For the reasons stated above, we are opposed to the rezoning of this property along Hardin Valley road.
We are opposing the zoning change on Hardin Valley road from agriculture to low density housing. - We are very concerned about the water run off if this rezoning and development is built. Our neighborhood, Chestnut Grove, does not have sewer or water run off drainage. All of our storm water naturally flows through our hills and natural waterways. If the land is changed in any way restructuring the land or removing the natural vegetation the whole area will have erosion and flooding issues. - Hill top protection must be a priority. Residents choose to live in locations for the feel of the surroundings. Driving past this specific area on Hardin Valley road really gives one the feeling of being in the foothills of the mountains and in a nice, clean, natural wooded space. Our specific neighborhood appears hidden as our developer respected and worked the natural vegetation into their development plans. All we ask is that surrounding developers respect the surrounding neighborhoods and keep with similar aesthetics. - The old growth forest must stay. Not only does it add to the aesthetics of the Hardin Valley area, but it is also home to many animals that the residents of the area love to see and enjoy. For the reasons stated above, we are opposed to the rezoning of this property along Hardin Valley road.
We are opposing the zoning change on Hardin Valley road from agriculture to low density housing. - We would like to see the county follow the Northwest Sector Plan. - Hardin Valley Elementary is already overcrowded having to bring in portable classrooms, some enrichment classes, such as art and music, are occurring in the homeroom classroom as the space for teaching their class has been taken over with double classrooms, having 2 teachers in a room with 40 plus students. As these grades move through the Hardin Valley system, the overcrowding issue will only become exacerbated. - Houses are already being built in the Hardin Valley area at a rate of 1 house every 32 hours. The infrastructure of the roads and school cannot handle this. We have been told that the increase in traffic is only from the school traffic. From personal experience of living in the area, I can vouch that is an untrue statement as most days when we are using Valley Vista Road and trying to turn right onto Hardin Valley road, it becomes a near impossible feat anytime between 7a – 6:30p. If I am needing to turn left onto Hardin Valley road, I have to drive down Yarnell road, turn right onto Campbell Station road, then turn right onto Hardin Valley road to safely and timely arrive at my destination in that area. For the reasons stated above, we are opposed to the rezoning of this property along Hardin Valley road.
We are opposing the zoning change on Hardin Valley road from agriculture to low density housing. - We are very concerned about the water run off if this rezoning and development is built. Our neighborhood, Chestnut Grove, does not have sewer or water run off drainage. All of our storm water naturally flows through our hills and natural waterways. If the land is changed in any way restructuring the land or removing the natural vegetation the whole area will have erosion and flooding issues. - Hill top protection must be a priority. Residents choose to live in locations for the feel of the surroundings. Driving past this specific area on Hardin Valley road really gives one the feeling of being in the foothills of the mountains and in a nice, clean, natural wooded space. Our specific neighborhood appears hidden as our developer respected and worked the natural vegetation into their development plans. All we ask is that surrounding developers respect the surrounding neighborhoods and keep with similar aesthetics. - The old growth forest must stay. Not only does it add to the aesthetics of the Hardin Valley area, but it is also home to many animals that the residents of the area love to see and enjoy. For the reasons stated above, we are opposed to the rezoning of this property along Hardin Valley road.
Please deny the rezoning! Please comply with the Knox County Northwest Sector Plan! Our family is concerned about the proposed development as it will negatively impact Hardin Valley. Please consider: - Forest preservation/reforestation/ old growth trees (Need to keep forest as a part of green space – do not clear cut, use Chestnut Grove as a model) - Wildlife disturbance and impact: turkeys, deer, raccoons, opossum, hawks, owls, songbirds, flying squirrels, etc. - Impact on school capacity and traffic congestion Please don't pave paradise to put in a "parking lot"
As a long a twenty year resident of Hardin Valley and The Chestnut Grove subdivision, I would like to oppose the rezoning of this parcel of land. I have concerns for the community. The traffic on Hardin Valley is already at maximum capacity and the schools are too crowded. Furthermore, the continued development of this community without preservation of old tree growth, wetlands, and animal habitat is an irresponsible stewardship of Hardin Valley. Our community doesn't need more homes, it needs more recreational areas, green spaces and walkways. As a resident of Chestnut Grove, I would like to see a vegetation buffer for height and to decrease visibility. Our neighborhood is a unique and long-standing property in Hardin Valley and deserves to have its aesthetics and property values preserved and protected.
Because of these concerns, I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection Designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property and the other recommendations which are outlined above.
5-C-22-SP Katherin (37932), May 6, 2022 at 9:09 AM
I request that the current zoning designation remain, that the application for rezoning be denied, and that no other zoning options be considered. If the planning commission decides to change the zoning, then I request that the decision be guided by the Northwest Sector Plan, the Hillside Protection designation, the existing development bordering most the proposed property
5-C-22-SP Susannah (37932), May 6, 2022 at 9:31 AM
Please keep the current zoning for agricultural purposes.
Hardin Valley road exits have already been widened due to great expense and the traffic still builds up onto Pellissippi Parkway at carpool times.
Turning lanes and sidewalks are already needed which will also be an added necessary expense which will also increase with the addition of the 4,000 plus houses that have already been permitted to be built.
The green space in our area is rapidly decreasing with many clear cut hillsides. Our wildlife along the creek bed which includes black bears, red tailed hawks, wild turkeys, deer, opossum, raccoons, chipmunks etc have a safe haven on the proposed property. If rezoning must occur please consider leaving a nature trail along the creek which already has natural dale of ferns with a ropes course and bridge that are idyllic. If the creek bed is filled in and the trees clear cut the bears and wildlife that have been living quietly in the woods will be roaming and upset.
The current home has spacious grounds for many profitable uses that do not require removal of the trees and creek bed wildlife.
Thank you for considering our plea on behalf of the wildlife.
5-E-22-RZ Susannah (37932), May 6, 2022 at 9:44 AM
Thank you for considering this plea to keep the current zoning as agriculture.
Hardin Valley Road and Schools are already over crowded. Hardin Valley Road Exit backs up onto The Pellissippi Highway causing delays in all directions at carpool times.
The proposed property has a wooded creek bed which is currently a safe haven for families of black bears, deer, wild turkeys, red tailed hawks, kestrels, etc. Please consider the opportunity for a beautiful nature trail which already contains a well built ropes course fun for all ages.
The flooding in our neighborhood has been less catastrophic than other neighborhoods because of the natural hills and creek. Please do not clear cut and fill in the creek.
I am writing to comment on the proposed re-zoning of the property in Chestnut Grove as part of Hardin Valley. This represents Concerns based on lack of infrastructure and also specific concerns for residents of Chestnut Grove and Elm Grove. Please see attached pdf. View Attachment
I wanted to take a moment to provide feedback on this proposed change to zoning. I am not sure if this request has been withdrawn as both posted notice signs were removed around 5/8/2022 and remain down as of the morning of 5/9/2022.
I am opposed to this change in zoning for a variety of factors. First, the change is inconsistent with the Sector Plan for the area. Much of the area surrounding this proposed rezoning is on residential housing or agricultural. To change this zoning will continue to open the Emory Road corridor to greater and greater amounts of commercial businesses that is inconsistent with the sector plan and potential creates safety concerns which will be discussed next.
More importantly in my mind is the public safety issue that this zoning would open up given the existing road structure and traffic. The property sits at the corner of Emory Road and Greenwell Road. Greenwell Road is a feeder road into Emory Road with many subdivisions with traffic turning in both directions. This intersection is already dangerous given the speeds that have become common place on Emory Road and the lack of a traffic signal. Multiple accidents including fatalities have occurred at this very spot.
I urge you to uphold the staff recommendation and deny this zoning and sector plan change request.
I agree with the planning staff to decline the rezoning request and I am also opposed. • First, the main reason I oppose the rezoning is that it sets a precedent in the area for commercial properties. The area out here is all agricultural and residential, and I think still quite beautiful. The nearest commercial properties to this location are 1 mile to the west and 2 miles to the east. Once a commercial zone is established in a residential or agricultural zone, it opens the door for more commercial properties. • Second, if the rezoning request is approved, there is no promise that the owner will not sell the property and give a future owner the opportunity to build any kind of business on the property allowed for Commercial Rural. This includes restaurants, gas stations, grocery stores and so on. • Third, the other reason I oppose is the traffic flow on that corner. As the planning staff has pointed out, there is no access via Greenwell due to the drainage ditch and holding pond. Traffic flow from Greenwell and along East Emory to the property could be confusing and possibly dangerous.
We have lived on Meeting house Road for 44 Years, and there was only one home on this property this whole time. Adding 50-60 more vehicles to Jenkins road every day could be a nightmare. Jenkins is our only way out and our home is at a deadend. Hopefully you will vote NO!!!! to this expansion.
I have no problems with development of the property on Jenkins road. However, my concern is with the number of homes that will be built on the land. Jenkins Road is not a big road at all and already carries the traffic from several subdivisions. Jenkins road also has a blind hill before getting to the property. This blind hill and speed of cars coming over the hill is already dangerous coming out of the Westop ll, the subdivision directly across the street from development. Please consider limiting the number of homes to two to three homes per acre. Thank you for your consideration.
The commission staff has recommended three houses per acre. Why would you go beyond that if the staff is recommending three? I oppose more than three houses per acre.
5-O-22-RZ Douglas (37920), May 10, 2022 at 7:57 AM
Please come out and walk this property before making such an important decision.. The map shows a lot, but until you walk it you can’t understand. These decisions that your making are gonna affect this area in a negative way. Bad curve to add 100 plus cars in the morning traffic flow. Can the schools handle this many more kids? Especially New hopewell elementary?
5-C-22-SP Jonathan (37931), May 10, 2022 at 1:03 PM
I am against rezoning to planned residential. Zoning 3 units per acre is absurd. At a maximum, it should be 1 unit per acre to main the aesthetics of the land. See attached comments (cross-filed with 5-C-22-SP). View Attachment
The HOA recognizes that >5du/ac is consistent with the Woods of Choto across Choto Road and Choto Meadows on the south side of the Farris property. Choto Meadows is separated from the Farris property by a wide tree buffer. There is no buffer between Lake Cove subdivision and the adjacent Farris property. Also, Holden Branch stream runs across the Farris property from Woods of Choto to Fort Loudon Lake which prohibits the building of residences. Lake Cove subdivision is >3du/ac. Because there is no buffer between the two properties as stated above and because of the decreased land available for building, we respectfully request that the property be designated as >3du/ac or, at most, >4du/ac.
Also, the number of cars forecasted by staff is a significant increase that will cause major traffic difficulties on what staff has called, a "country road". Choto road has no shoulders. The increase of cars from the Woods of Choto traffic has caused back-ups on Choto Road. The stretch of road directly in front of the subdivision is already badly in need of repair. We request that any approval of an increase in lots on the Farris property be accompanied by the widening of Choto road to include a turn lane into the Farris property as well as road shoulders. The entrance to the Farris property is in a precarious location as pertains to the entrances of both Lake Cove and the Woods of Choto properties and needs to be carefully considered.
Please do not approve housing more dense that three houses per acre for the lot at 7912 Jenkins Road. Please consider the existing neighbors of this property in your decision-making. Please think - what if this proposed development were near my house? What would I want near me?
We don't need a 30% increase in traffic on tiny, no shoulder, Jenkins Road. We don't need all this additional traffic trying to enter Jenkins at a blind hill.
Also, when are you going to put a sidewalk on Jenkins Road? We have no choice but to drive to leave our home due to the lack of sidewalk or even shoulder on Jenkins. We're actually within walking distance to the shopping center at Cedar Bluff and Middlebrook with the Krogers, but the only safe way to get there is to get in a car.
5-O-22-RZ Richard (37920), May 10, 2022 at 4:02 PM
Although I am not opposed to the rezoning itself, I am submitting a plea to deny the request for five dwellings per acre on the afore mentioned rezoning of 5-O-22 RZ. 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre would fit more consistently within the established neighborhood. There is also a concern for traffic safety due to the property being located on Gov. John Sevier Highway in a curve with low visibility.
There is also concern for an increase of student population at the zoned New Hopewell elementary school. Please adhere to the Knox Planning departments’ research, planned studies and favorable recommendation.
Please deny this amount of density in regards to number of houses for this lot. The amount of homes needs to match the existing planning involved with the historic neighborhood moving forward. This is county and not city and should be treated accordingly. Please consider these suggestions from the community members and educated engineers.
I live off Choto Road in Knox County, it took quite a while to convince people of the need for a fire station in this community. Concerns listed below.
1) Currently, with the establishment of several new housing developments, along Choto and Northshore this has increased the vehicle traffic, and this has posed significant traffic backup.
2) Several other developments along McFee area, will increase the traffic flow even more.
3) It's hard to believe the planners have established sufficient traffic studies; Fire Response/Paramedic responses to handle numerous situations with the volume of homes coming to this area.
4) The number of homes per lot size ~ 1 acre per home should not be reduced due to the continual increase to the safety of the knox county citizens. (Due to Fire/Emergency time responses to homes; potential traffic accidents)
In summary, lot sizes should stay as currently designed; (thus reducing the continual pressure on traffic and emergency responses) future studies should be done to ensure public safety is of the Upmost Importance.
I ask that you consider limiting the Development of the parcel at 1606 Hart Road to 3 single-family dwelling units per acre instead of the recommended 4 dwelling units per acre and the requested 5 dwelling units per acre.
We are located next to the proposed Harper Auto Collision Center. I am personally in favor of the location. Mr. Harper has gone out of his way to work with us on any concern over traffic, ingress and landscaping.
I recently bought a house in a new subdivision off Beeler Road. Traffic in the general area of Halls/Emory/Beeler is already significantly higher than I expected. I strongly suggest you at least keep the proposed subdivision to the original staff recommendation of 3 du/ac.
We are the incoming HOA board for the neighborhood where these houses will be built. We don't have any context for this decision because we haven't seen any floor plans, only the stakes outlining where Goodall Homes originally intended to put houses.
Based on those stakes, we aren’t sure five feet will be enough to move some of these homes a reasonable distance from the edge of the 2:1 dropoff behind them.
The approval recommendation states traffic to the neighborhood will not be affected, but have the effects of this variance on parking been considered? If the driveway is shortened, will there be ample space for parking that does not obstruct the sidewalk (if there is one) or spill over onto the street? Residents are already frustrated with street parking and congestion here.
It seems that homes with a smaller footprint would make more sense on the lots in question, which have less level space to build on.