Public Comments

March 30, 2022
at 6:45 PM

William
37920

4-A-22-PD
William (37920), March 30, 2022 at 6:45 PM

The building of these apartment houses is raising a great deal of concern amongst our South Haven community. This part of South Knoxville is already a heavily crowded part of town, and these apartments will add to the issue tenfold. One has to worry about the consequences that will be had for traffic in the town on the already busy and narrow streets. Property values are also expected to plummet. While the old school should be repurposed, the effects of such a large income of people into the community is very worrisome.

March 31, 2022
at 4:18 PM

Astrid
37920

4-A-22-PD
Astrid (37920), March 31, 2022 at 4:18 PM

please see PDF
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220331161827.pdf

March 31, 2022
at 7:41 PM

Sonia
37920

4-A-22-PD
Sonia (37920), March 31, 2022 at 7:41 PM

It breaks my heart to see what happened in Nashville happening in Knoxville. There is no way they’re is enough room while maintaining the I integrity of the community infrastructure. We’d love to stay and support this community but if these projects continue their is no way we will.

Astrid
37920

4-A-22-PD
Astrid (37920), April 1, 2022 at 7:39 AM

My PDF won't post so I will upload multiple comments here. I honestly am not sure where to even begin. I purchased my 102 year old home on McClung in 2020. I exclusively looked in this area to buy my first home because I wanted to be part of the rejuvenation and revitalization of the South Knoxville. The neighborhood and roads are very closely stitched together so when I was made aware by a fellow neighbor of Mr Cockrill's plan to put in 99 more residential dwellings I was shocked. My shock then quickly turned to concern as these plans included raising three/four additional buildings on the small sight along with 130 parking spaces? We are a small family neighborhood and the current infrastructure is not capable of handling that many more individuals. We have existing sewage and flooding issues that are not being addressed and the electrical grid goes out pretty regularly. More concerning to me as those issues 'can' be fixed is the amount of people he is proposing be relocated to this dense area.

April 1, 2022
at 7:39 AM

Astrid
37920

4-A-22-PD
Astrid (37920), April 1, 2022 at 7:39 AM

(second part) His current proposal will completely alter the dynamic of our neighborhood. COMPLETLY. Not to mention the amount of green space negatively impacted, the whole reason for our urban wilderness initiative, along with the wildlife. I wholeheartedly agree the building cannot remain abandoned and am 1000% for using the EXHISTING structure for some sort of living space but believe mid to high end condominiums to be a better option/fit by only utilizing the current structure. When meeting with Mr Cockrill he made it a point that he 'does not need to do this, he enjoys rehabilitating historic buildings' . If that is truly the case there should be no questions as to what would work for both the developer and the neighborhood. This neighborhood CANNOT absorb this type of development. PLEASE do not allow this rezoning to take place. You will loose the whole purpose of trying to flip this area of town. A number of neighbors including myself have already started to consider leaving the neighborhood if this 'development' goes through.

April 1, 2022
at 7:39 AM

April 5, 2022
at 10:27 AM

Loney
37920

4-A-22-PD
Loney (37920), April 5, 2022 at 10:27 AM

The proposed building of these apartment will greatly impact our community by way of traffic, overcrowding schools, and most importantly homeowners will sale and move away. We take great pride in our neighborhood and do agree with the redevelopment of the existing structure. Please do not allow this rezoning!

Stephanie
37920

4-A-22-PD
Stephanie (37920), April 5, 2022 at 3:41 PM

I live at 1829 Beech Street and have for 13 years. I love our neighborhood, and have great concerns regarding turning said property into low income apartments. Beech Street is narrow, and cannot accommodate the homeowners who currently reside on that street. I worry about the property values of the homes that so many people have worked so hard to keep. I worry about increased crime in our area, and what it will expose our children to. I do not have a problem with families in need of a home, however, please consider section 8 houses as opposed to low income apartments. The houses will at least fit into the neighborhood, there will only be a need for driveways as opposed to 199 parking spaces. Please at least take into consideration allowing section 8 houses in our area, as any change will be an adjustment for those of us who have lived in the neighborhood for so long.

April 5, 2022
at 3:41 PM

Patsy
37920

4-A-22-PD
Patsy (37920), April 5, 2022 at 9:42 PM

Revitalize Historical Giffin Elementary School. In the past several years it had been discussed of it becoming an assisted living. Could that not be revisited? South Knoxville has numerous low income/section 8 apartments. We just recently had 2 more low income/section 8 apartment complexes built with in 2 miles of this suggested development. Please Vote NO on the rezoning!

April 5, 2022
at 9:42 PM

April 5, 2022
at 11:10 PM

Katherine
37920

4-A-22-PD
Katherine (37920), April 5, 2022 at 11:10 PM

Let me start out by saying that I am all for the revitalization of the old Giffin Elementary School. The building needs to be utilized. The concern that I have, along with many others, regarding the development of (4-A-22-PD) 99 apartments being built on Beech Street are the additional cars/traffic. More traffic has been added in the past several years because of Ijams Nature Center & Bakers Creek development. These apartments would add to this congestion along with more speeding on South Haven. The roads in the South Haven community are not as maintained as they should be. The roads around the development (McClung Ave., South Haven, Beech Street, Lenland Ave) are narrow, uneven in many areas and have numerous potholes. This will also get worse with the added traffic. A person also has to be concerned about additional crime coming into our area with so many new people. South Knoxville has had 2 new low income/section 8 apartment complexes added with in 2 miles of Beech Street in the past couple of years already. PLEASE DO NOT allow this to happen. Help us keep our quaint neighborhood.

Cara
3792

4-A-22-PD
Cara ( 3792), April 6, 2022 at 1:04 PM

My concern to this request is to the deterioration of our neighborhood. My husband and I relocated to the area in 2019. I am originally from South Knoxville and moved back after 25 years in the fountain city area. Our current home on McClung has been in our family since 1952, so I have been a part of the community all of my life. The upcoming of the community is what brought us back. Homes were being remodeled and brought back to life. The parks and trails were opening up and to us the South Haven area had once again started to look like home.

April 6, 2022
at 1:04 PM

Cara
37920

4-A-22-PD
Cara (37920), April 6, 2022 at 1:06 PM

We started the process of remodeling the old eyesore on the corner. It was literally the worst home in the area. So many of our neighbors have put in so much time and effort to reestablish the small area. I have been here for three years and not one summer have I been able to sit on my back porch for dinner/bbq. Our sewer system is disgusting. The smell is embarrassing when having company. A study showed sewage in the creek. It’s been three years and the city/KUB can’t control this situation. How could the sewer handle adding 93 units and the additional construction on that slope? It will be devastating to our creek and it’s wildlife. That wooded area has become a bird sanctuary and what little wildlife left in South Haven will be gone. Not to mention the creek has been known to hold the endangered Berry Cave Salamander. Our tiny roads are already over traveled and we just finally got speed bumps In an attempt to help with that issue. Some homes barely have yards already and taking more for sidewalks would not be fair to those home owners. The neighborhood could not sustain such an increase in population. The school is a staple for our community and tho we know it needs to be used for something, having it surrounded with concrete buildings will not do it justice as a historic building. I wish to deny the application.

April 6, 2022
at 1:06 PM

Kara
37920

4-A-22-PD
Kara (37920), April 6, 2022 at 4:34 PM

This project proposes too much dwelling density. The proposed area is tucked inside a quiet neighborhood, with a park and a stream running though it. These plans would take down many of the very large trees along this area. I would love to see this space converted into condos or mixed income housing at way less capacity.

April 6, 2022
at 4:34 PM

Jess
37920

4-A-22-PD
Jess (37920), April 6, 2022 at 6:28 PM

I oppose this rezoning. The proposed use of the 6.3 acres and forested hillside is extremely out of character for our neighborhood. South Knoxville is known for it's natural landscapes and this rezoning would destroy one of South Haven neighborhood's forested areas. We have coyotes, salamanders, amazing hawks and other birds - it is truly a haven not just for the residents but also for the wildlife. Erecting 5 additional buildings on this property is out of character for the area and would create towering buildings along a steep hillside that should remain forested. I actually would like to know if a hillside protection overlay would be appropriate, given the grade of the hillside. I am absolutely in favor of an appropriate use for the historic school itself. The original plan for an assisted living facility would have given residents beautiful trees and birds to watch out their windows and contributed minimal traffic, noise pollution, light pollution, and potential crime on our community. There are many many other options for re-use of the facility and I will enthusiastically support rezoning, if necessary, for plans that fit within our neighborhood. It is the duty of the MPC and City Council to ensure that zoning changes and development are beneficial to our community. Neither the use case nor the scale of this proposal are beneficial.

April 6, 2022
at 6:28 PM

Edward
37920

4-A-22-PD
Edward (37920), April 6, 2022 at 7:01 PM

My grandparents, my parents as well as myself have lived in the South Knoxville & South Haven community for over 100 years. I myself went to Giffin Elementary school. I would like to see the school be revitalized into something that will help our community & help our property values continue to increase but not section 8 or low income housing put into our community. With Ijams Nature Center expanding & Bakers Creek being developed & the Greenways, our property values have started to increase. Traffic has gotten more congested with people coming from all over to these areas & will only get worse with 99 more apartments added on Beech Street. The City of Knoxville can not keep up with the maintanence on the roads in the area now. The roads have a lot of uneveness & pot holes & these too will get worse with the added daily trips from the 99 apartments being added. One has to also realize that the exit from Beech Street onto Lenland Ave is a right turn ONLY. The left turn is a dead end. Lenland & South Haven it is a blind intersection & there will be in increase of accidents because it is bad enough now with the traffic that we have. Why crame 99 more apartments in the middle of a small neighborhood community? It is a shame that an out of town delveloper can come into our neighborhood with low income/section 8 housing & force this upon our community. Please VOTE NO on the rezoning!

April 6, 2022
at 7:01 PM

Tyler
37912

4-A-22-PD
Tyler (37912), April 7, 2022 at 9:43 AM

I SUPPORT this development because it includes 99 units of subsidized housing.

April 7, 2022
at 9:43 AM

April 7, 2022
at 11:51 AM

Catherine
37919

4-A-22-PD
Catherine (37919), April 7, 2022 at 11:51 AM

I am writing in support of the affordable housing project proposed for the former Giffin School in south Knoxville. Knoxville and Knox County should do everything possible to help our citizens find decent places to live. You shouldn't have to be rich to afford housing.

Nathan
37920

4-A-22-PD
Nathan (37920), April 7, 2022 at 2:19 PM

The ordinances governing planned developments state (section 16.7) that they "should ONLY be applied to further those applications that provide compensating amenities and benefits to the City AND neighborhood." (emphases mine). The MOST important component of the neighborhood to consider is the surrounding neighborhood - those neighbors directly impacted by the proposed development. This proposal does NOT benefit the surrounding neighborhood and is therefore disqualified from the zoning exemptions requested under Planned Development. The current "Historic Giffin Square" proposal will NEGATIVELY impact both property values and quality of life for people in the surrounding neighborhood, for the following reasons:
1) the scale is too large,

2) it effectively eliminates the positives Giffin School brings to the neighborhood, and

3) the type of use is inappropriate for the location.

If preserving the historic school building is a +1 for the neighborhood, the combined effects of problems 1-3 above are at least a -10. That is, whatever good this development might bring to the neighborhood is vastly diminished by the negative impacts it will have. In the attached PDF I detail my reasoning for the above comments.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220407141912.pdf

April 7, 2022
at 2:19 PM

Kendall
37920

4-A-22-PD
Kendall (37920), April 7, 2022 at 2:26 PM

This will take so much away from a beautiful neighborhood. Repurposing the school I think would be a wonderful addition to the neighborhood. We don’t need more units beyond that in our little community.

April 7, 2022
at 2:26 PM

John
37920

4-A-22-PD
John (37920), April 7, 2022 at 3:22 PM

Im opposed to this rezoning,I don't want our neighbor changed into a busy traffic in the neighborhood,its always been a quiet area,I oppose this all together.

April 7, 2022
at 3:22 PM

Sarah
37920

4-A-22-PD
Sarah (37920), April 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM

Hello. I have major concerns about this structure. A sad truth of subsidized housing is it often brings crime to the area. As a single woman this is concerning. The infrastructure in this area is unable to support more people, everything is is packed as it is. This location is not the best place for new subsidized housing, especially not as many units as the plan proposes.

April 7, 2022
at 3:30 PM

Bob
37920

4-A-22-PD
Bob (37920), April 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM

My request is for My City is to Not build this LOW RENT Living ln this Area .(1)is because of traffic .(2) is because of the clients that will becoming and @all hours of the .(3) Is that ,The South end has given more Than any other part of City.(4) If you Just look @ what has happened on Chapman Hwy. Just in the last 3 years

People it’s TIME To VOTE, get some people out of Office!

April 7, 2022
at 6:46 PM

Heather
37920

4-A-22-PD
Heather (37920), April 7, 2022 at 7:54 PM

As a former Giffin student and long-time resident of South Knoxville, I support this project. With all due respect to neighbors' concerns, I don't think these problems are unsolvable. Please read my attached PDF for more detail. Thank you.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220407195405.pdf

April 7, 2022
at 7:54 PM

Rosie
37917

4-A-22-PD
Rosie (37917), April 8, 2022 at 7:41 AM

This is a huge need in our community. I support this project and its proposed location.

April 8, 2022
at 7:41 AM

Brian
37920

4-A-22-PD
Brian (37920), April 8, 2022 at 9:01 AM

I am here against the proposal to add a 99 unit complex to our small residential neighborhood of South Haven. Beech Street and the adjoining roads are no place for such traffic. Crime has been on the increase in our neighborhood and more then doubling the population would significantly add to the problem putting our neighbors in danger. I do not know exact numbers but in the last year alone there have been ridiculous numbers of apartments, subdivision, dwellings proposed and approved for the South Knoxville area when nothing is being done about Chapman Highway other then the obvious band-Aids here and there. As I am typing this Chapman and Young High pike are shut down to a possible fatal accident. This is an everyday occurrence and adding people by the 100’s -1000’s a year needs to stop until our families can travel safely to the grocery store. This proposal should need to scale down tremendously to be approved.

April 8, 2022
at 9:01 AM

Janie
37920

4-A-22-PD
Janie (37920), April 8, 2022 at 9:49 AM

I am in opposition to this development of a 99 unit going into this neighborhood. Overcrowding this small neighborhood and traffic issues are of great concern to me.

April 8, 2022
at 9:49 AM

Stephanie
920

4-A-22-PD
Stephanie (920), April 8, 2022 at 1:53 PM

I have lived in this neighborhood for 13 years, raised my children here. Now I have my two year old granddaughter I would love to raise on beech street also, however I have great concerns about low income apartments in our quiet neighborhood. I am concerned it will increase the crime rate in our area. I am concerned it will depreciate the value of my home, our homes. I wish the property could remain untouched because of the protected animals in that area. I would so prefer section 8 houses, single family homes because it will fit with the surrounding structures adding value to the neighborhood. Please remember so many families have homes here, and they bought these homes for the security and protection it gives to our families. Please don’t create anything to take away from what we have worked so hard to have. I understand helping needy families, however do it for the benefit of both, future residents as well as current residents,

April 8, 2022
at 1:53 PM

April 9, 2022
at 12:38 AM

Emily
37865

4-A-22-PD
Emily (37865), April 9, 2022 at 12:38 AM

On behalf of Knoxville, this would be its downfall. If you choose to place subsidized housing you’re going to hurt it’s charm and market appeal, especially now when so many people are relocating to South Knoxville. The equity will vanish! This is a terrible terrible idea! This isn’t a low income area, we have Island Home less than a mile down the road. This makes no sense! Not to mention what it does to the safety standards! Weren’t we looking to bring better business to the area? Grow the area so that we bring in more money?? There’s a better plan for this school, one that brings money in instead of the former.

Gregory
37920

4-A-22-PD
Gregory (37920), April 9, 2022 at 6:59 AM

We need workforce housing in this area, which is close to businesses and to downtown Knoxville. If you look over the traffic study, adding 946 vehicle trips per 24 hour period is next to nothing and will not change traffic on any local roads or on Chapman Highway. In the traffic study, even at peak morning and afternoon times, there are only 53 trips during the AM peak hour and 76 trips during the PM peak hour. Surely the area roads can handle that small increase in vehicle trips without causing any issues while giving South Knoxville 99 units of extra, much-needed housing and tax revenue for the city. The old school has been vacant and neglected for decades now and new housing would be a perfect fix to this historic building. There does need to be adequate parking for residents and guests, so there is no overflow parking on area streets. It also must be proven that construction will not cause water drainage issues in the surrounding homes and that there should also be as many trees saved and not cut down as possible. In order to make all this work, a retention pond may be needed and the project may have to be reduced in size and scope by maybe eliminating one of the proposed buildings. Also, if the developer is promising anything to the community, like a community center or anything for community use, then it MUST be required that the builder follow through and complete everything as promised.

April 9, 2022
at 6:59 AM

Ben
37920

4-A-22-PD
Ben (37920), April 9, 2022 at 1:05 PM

Please see attached for my comments.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220409130543.pdf

April 9, 2022
at 1:05 PM

April 11, 2022
at 2:59 AM

Billie
37920

4-A-22-PD
Billie (37920), April 11, 2022 at 2:59 AM

I have lived in this community for 48 years. I do not want to see housing projects go up in the old Giffin Elementary School. I live on the dead-end at the bottom of hill I do not want to have to drive thru the projects every time I come and go from my home. My main concern is my children and grandchildren I don't want them to have to pass thru to ride there bikes or catch a school bus. This is the most craziest thing I've heard I lived thru the change when they built the new bridge and re-done our community then. We definitely don't need these apartments in our community we have a very nice quiet community with alot of elderly people this will be a very very bad thing. I would rather see a community center, assistant living, something for the children not apartments that are gonna cause harm and I'm sure drug use in our community I Vote NO!!!! Don't take what little we have left and make it into projects. Things are just starting to look up around here and as a 48 year Home Owner our value of our properties have just started to rise with the new bike park and all the new Sevier Ave developments. I think this needs to be revised and thought about really hard and also when our property value starts to go down hill whom ever the ideal plan of this needs to buy us out at the top dollar I think the ones that live right there and will have to see these projects every time they leave inside there home we should have the say and the final vote.

April 12, 2022
at 10:14 PM

S D
37920

4-A-22-PD
S D (37920), April 12, 2022 at 10:14 PM

I OPPOSE the rezoning of Giffin school property! Our neighborhood cannot absorb the impact of 100+ new families in this space. Low income housing brings many problems to any neighborhood. We have many low income housing units on this side of Chapman Hwy. We have Southmont, Stonewall, Young High Flats, Southside Flats and many voucher houses! We have enough! Senior housing sounds nice but the working family housing is the issue!!

5-D-22-RZ

Michael
37938

5-D-22-RZ
Michael (37938), May 9, 2022 at 7:40 AM

I wanted to take a moment to provide feedback on this proposed change to zoning. I am not sure if this request has been withdrawn as both posted notice signs were removed around 5/8/2022 and remain down as of the morning of 5/9/2022.

I am opposed to this change in zoning for a variety of factors. First, the change is inconsistent with the Sector Plan for the area. Much of the area surrounding this proposed rezoning is on residential housing or agricultural. To change this zoning will continue to open the Emory Road corridor to greater and greater amounts of commercial businesses that is inconsistent with the sector plan and potential creates safety concerns which will be discussed next.

More importantly in my mind is the public safety issue that this zoning would open up given the existing road structure and traffic. The property sits at the corner of Emory Road and Greenwell Road. Greenwell Road is a feeder road into Emory Road with many subdivisions with traffic turning in both directions. This intersection is already dangerous given the speeds that have become common place on Emory Road and the lack of a traffic signal. Multiple accidents including fatalities have occurred at this very spot.

I urge you to uphold the staff recommendation and deny this zoning and sector plan change request.

May 9, 2022
at 7:40 AM

5-D-22-RZ

Mike
37938

5-D-22-RZ
Mike (37938), May 9, 2022 at 8:38 AM

I agree with the planning staff to decline the rezoning request and I am also opposed.
• First, the main reason I oppose the rezoning is that it sets a precedent in the area for commercial properties. The area out here is all agricultural and residential, and I think still quite beautiful. The nearest commercial properties to this location are 1 mile to the west and 2 miles to the east. Once a commercial zone is established in a residential or agricultural zone, it opens the door for more commercial properties.
• Second, if the rezoning request is approved, there is no promise that the owner will not sell the property and give a future owner the opportunity to build any kind of business on the property allowed for Commercial Rural. This includes restaurants, gas stations, grocery stores and so on.
• Third, the other reason I oppose is the traffic flow on that corner. As the planning staff has pointed out, there is no access via Greenwell due to the drainage ditch and holding pond. Traffic flow from Greenwell and along East Emory to the property could be confusing and possibly dangerous.

May 9, 2022
at 8:38 AM

5-B-22-SP

Robert
37918

5-B-22-SP
Robert (37918), May 11, 2022 at 1:30 PM

See Attached pdf file
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220511133034.pdf

May 11, 2022
at 1:30 PM

6-G-22-UR

Jeremy
37931

6-G-22-UR
Jeremy (37931), June 6, 2022 at 4:47 PM

Hello, I was under the impression this was denied for 7du an acre, but now it looks like it has been approved. I am also trying to figure out why the planning board is letting the developer put 95 homes on 10.60 acres. This is 9 Du per acre, which is well above any development nearby. I would like someone to contact me and explain to me how this can be justified. You have my contact info above. I will post this on my neighborhood Facebook page to let everyone know what's happening. Have a great day!

June 6, 2022
at 4:47 PM

6-SD-22-C

Alan
37931

6-SD-22-C
Alan (37931), June 7, 2022 at 10:14 AM

This property is surrounded on three sides by single family dwellings with a low to medium density. The plan for this property should not be approved unless it continues with this low to medium density single dwellings. What they are proposing (95 units) is far to many units for the 14 acres. The proposal that the developer is wanting approved is only good for them and not for any of the surroundings neighbors.

June 7, 2022
at 10:14 AM

Sus
37920

4-A-22-PD
Sus (37920), June 7, 2022 at 10:55 PM

Life long South Knox resident. You are destroying our neighborhoods! KCDC, voucher programs, low income housing are destroying home owner values! No limits on occupancy in rental units! Eleven people lived in house on Lenland that burned yesterday! Rental houses with 10 all male residents! Gunshots fired at mcclung and s haven into Mary James park in the afternoon! 12 shots rang out! No arrests! S Haven is a speeders paradise! Help us! So Knox can’t take anymore low income housing!!!! We have too much already!!! Southmont on Moody, Bertie Rand St apts, Taliwa apts , Stonewall apts, Stonewall II, Young High flats, Southside flats, KCDC voucher housing on every street! We have more than our share of low income housing now!!! STOP PLEASE!

June 7, 2022
at 10:55 PM

June 14, 2022
at 10:54 AM

john
37920

4-A-22-PD
john (37920), June 14, 2022 at 10:54 AM

we don"t need any more apartment development in south knoxville. driving through streets is already bad enough now and you want to add more traffic. And to add 75 -100 units more (enough is enough)

6-SD-22-C

Sarah
37921

6-SD-22-C
Sarah (37921), June 15, 2022 at 5:41 PM

This is way too many single family homes per acre. How is this justified to do time and time again in Knoxville that is already overflowing with these types of cookie cutter homes stacked one on top of the other. Stop letting this happen. It is absolutely ruining Knoxville to have these literally everywhere.

June 15, 2022
at 5:41 PM

Zelma
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Zelma (37931), June 21, 2022 at 1:37 PM

I oppose connecting the Hattie's Place Subdivision to Fitzgerald Road. I have lived on Boss Road, which Fitzgerald connects to my entire life. Both Boss and Fitzgerald are a one lane country road with not many places to pull over. We recently had speed bumps added to our roads to slow and deter traffic. The end of Fitzgerald is connected to Ball Road and Ball Camp Road where the railroad crosses. This is an extremely dangerous intersection where many traffic accidents happen. I hope the planning commission would take into consideration the lives of the people that already live on Boss and Fitzgerald. Adding a ton more traffic to an already dangerous situation is just a very poor planning decision and not taking any concern for the folks that already are taking that risk.

June 21, 2022
at 1:37 PM

Zelma
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Zelma (37931), June 21, 2022 at 3:05 PM

I wrote a comment previously on the proposal which I read incorrectly. If the plan is to make the area agricultural, I whole-heartedly approve of this request. I am sorry for any confusion.

June 21, 2022
at 3:05 PM

June 23, 2022
at 10:00 AM

Ryan
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Ryan (37931), June 21, 2022 at 8:20 PM

If this property owner is indeed requesting agricultural, I fully support. Only if this is to allow for more natural grasses growing in the fields. Caring neighbor.

June 21, 2022
at 8:20 PM

5-D-22-RZ

Sheree
938

5-D-22-RZ
Sheree (938), June 22, 2022 at 9:02 PM

With regard to Sector Plan Change and Rezoning for 2707 E. Emory Road I agree with the Staff’s Recommendation and the Public Comments submitted to date to deny both the Sector Plan Change and the Rezoning. In a previous comment it was noted that the list of 60 some potenntial businesses and offices allowed with the Rural Commercial zoning is overwhelming and unnecessary. To add to this, locating commercial businesses in this area would increase traffic on an already congested and dangerous intersection leading onto Emory road. There have already been three fatalities at that very intersection. There are many commercial businesses just three miles in either direction thus the need for additional businesses is not necessary and would add to safety issues already present at that intersection and curve. Encouraging unnecessary commercial development would result ultimately in businesses failing while reducing property values unnecessarily. Residential development is needed as affordable housing is an issue in Knox County. Single family residential development is consistent and compatible with the surrounding area and would help in addressing the housing crisis in our county.

June 22, 2022
at 9:02 PM

7-R-22-RZ

Eric
37920

7-R-22-RZ
Eric (37920), June 23, 2022 at 10:00 AM

A local realtor company, Realty Executives, is selling a lot of the surrounding land in the Neubert Springs area, which is heavily forested. They are doing so quite quickly according to them, "while the market is hot." Most of this land (outside of the pre-existing housing) is home to falcons, owls, foxes, deer, coyotes, turkeys. All sorts of amphibians and reptiles. This particular realtor said that the land and habitat was going to be bush hogged and sold for further destruction. I understand that this is private property but can anything be done to help with preservation?

I don’t have the money to buy the land. But there is no need for this land to be destroyed, or renovated in any way. To my understanding, the same realtor company has already done this once further down the road to the protest of the residents. The reason this land is so beautiful is due to the forest. I do not want to see another habitat destroyed. I think we’ve done enough destruction. We have plenty of greenways and housing. We need to leave what little we have left for nature. Please consider too that it is our forests and rivers that make Knox and Knox County so beautiful.

Paul
37931

7-B-22-UR
Paul (37931), June 24, 2022 at 2:29 PM

We are very concerned about this development and want to ensure that no incursions from this development occur on our property. We want the developer/owner to put up a substantial fence between our properties to keep workers, contractors, future land owners and etc. from incursions onto our property in any manner. The present developer and land owner would pay for this fence and pay to maintain it for the foreseeable future.

If these conditions cannot be met we ask that this development be denied.

June 24, 2022
at 2:29 PM

Melissa
37772

7-B-22-UR
Melissa (37772), June 24, 2022 at 6:38 PM

I am concerned about respect for the Burial grounds on the adjoining property. It is important to me that a fence is built by the developers to avoid desecration of the graves and impacting our tranquil setting.

In addition, trees straddling the property line should remain unharmed to preserve the green zone for our view and for the value to animals and the environment.

The final item is concern about drainage. Use of our field, which contains space for a community garden, open play space, a burial ground, and overflow parking for church related events, may be compromised by inadequate planning. If the proposed building activity which adjoins our property uses nonpermeable surfaces and an insufficient method of handling runoff this will adversely affect our property value and usage of our land.

June 24, 2022
at 6:38 PM

Sylvia
37920

4-A-22-PD
Sylvia (37920), June 27, 2022 at 1:41 PM

I think the negotiated plan with the South Haven Neighborhood Association seems to be the best solution to a blighted area and the need for Affordable Housing. Thank goodness we have active neighborhood associations in South Knoxville who are always on the alert.

June 27, 2022
at 1:41 PM

Sara
37020

4-A-22-PD
Sara (37020), June 27, 2022 at 2:45 PM

With regard to affordable house,the entire country is behind on building Housing that fixed income people and workers can afford. It is essential that we build strong neighborhoods that include housing for every part of our population. Infrastructure must also be built to accommodate that housing I have supported the affordable housing in Knoxville since the grants began this war needs to be continued.

June 27, 2022
at 2:45 PM

June 28, 2022
at 11:49 AM

Ken and Dee
37920

4-A-22-PD
Ken and Dee (37920), June 27, 2022 at 3:08 PM

We have lived in South Knoxville over 40 years. We are in favor of subsidized housing and also in favor of repurposing our old schools. I think other examples of this should put to rest some of the concerns expressed in other comments. We favor this proposal.

June 27, 2022
at 3:08 PM

7-A-22-SU

Tanya
37921

7-A-22-SU
Tanya (37921), June 28, 2022 at 11:49 AM

I do not think this is a good idea as I'm concerned it will adversely affect the SFRs in the area.

7-H-22-SP

Anne
37909

7-H-22-SP
Anne (37909), June 30, 2022 at 3:21 PM

I would like to know more about this change of zoning for this property that directly joins our neighborhood off Wesley Road.

When Tennova bought the property several years ago, we heard that there would be medical facilities built there. We did not hear about any multi-housing units being built there at all! Please clarify this for us!

Is it possible to have more time to evaluate what is being proposed so that our neighbors are better informed?

Thanks for your consideration. Please let us know if this is possible. Thank you

June 30, 2022
at 3:21 PM

7-A-22-RZ

Lena
37917

7-A-22-RZ
Lena (37917), June 30, 2022 at 4:23 PM

Please see attached letter received via mail 6.29.22
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220630162314.pdf

June 30, 2022
at 4:23 PM

Michael
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Michael (37931), June 30, 2022 at 5:29 PM

I vote against them making this lot agricultural. There have already been problems with rats from the last time the grass was high and then mowed down. Lawn maintenance is something we're all responsible to do and it isn't fun, but it keeps the property values where they should be in the local market. My understanding is they want to make it agricultural so they don't have to mow the property. Changing the lot to agricultural so the owners don't have to mow is not a good reason.

June 30, 2022
at 5:29 PM

Tina
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Tina (37931), June 30, 2022 at 7:47 PM

I am against this zoning change.

June 30, 2022
at 7:47 PM

Syconda
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Syconda (37931), July 1, 2022 at 1:22 AM

I own a house which shares a fence line with the property in question. The owners before them always kept the grass mowed and I never had issues with vermin. WHEN THEY MOVED IN THE CURRENT OWNERS PLANTED A SMALL BACKYARD GARDEN. They kept the grass mowed and burned some branches since much of the property is wooded. In the last few months they have done no yardwork. And I've had to used several rat traps In my garage to keep the mice down that are coming under the fence from the waist deep grass in their yard. It is a yard not a field. The grass and poison ivy is growing through the privacy fence that borders their yard on my side I know. This is not a rezoning to keep animals or raise large crops from any signs I can see. There is a small back yard garden but I believe the rezoning will cause a pest nuisance to the surrounding residents. For these reasons I am a gainst the rezoning.

July 1, 2022
at 1:22 AM

William
37920

4-A-22-PD
William (37920), July 1, 2022 at 10:52 AM

We already have section 8 housing in this neighborhood. This is not a new experience is for us. lt is unwanted and unneeded at this location. In order for people who would live there to catch a bus they would have to walk to the other section 8 housing development. There are plenty of other locations. Adorable housing should be in every neighborhood not all in one neighborhood. Not to mention the historical value of this property. No thank you.

July 1, 2022
at 10:52 AM

Wayne
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Wayne (37931), July 1, 2022 at 3:07 PM

I share a fence line with this property. I am against the rezoning of this property for reasons mentioned in other comments mainly the vermin concerns. As this property has recently changed owners it can do so in future. Without a detailed plan of what this is going to be used for and what crop will be planted in conjunction with future owners adhering to those specifics, I cannot agree. Depending on the crop, ie hemp, could introduce other undesirable elements to the equation.

July 1, 2022
at 3:07 PM

Sharie
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Sharie (37931), July 4, 2022 at 11:54 AM

I own a house which shares the fence line on the North (wooded) side of the property. The wooded portion of the property has not been maintained at all this year. The overgrown trees are hanging on and over the fence line, there are dead trees/branches that can and eventually will fall and damage fences and houses, holes are being dug under the fence by vermin's that are invading our property. I don't feel that an agricultural zoning for the 2216 Fitzgerald Rd. lot which is in the middle of a subdivision is fair to the people that purchased their property and maintain it. Therefor I am against the rezoning of 2216 Fitzgerald Rd.

July 4, 2022
at 11:54 AM

Jake
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Jake (37931), July 6, 2022 at 8:58 PM

Please see PDF attachment for our comments.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220706205851.pdf

July 6, 2022
at 8:58 PM

7-P-22-RZ

Logan
37909

7-P-22-RZ
Logan (37909), July 7, 2022 at 3:28 PM

Based on the Hillside Protection chart it would seem that any development on this site would be very limited. Please advise on the results of the slope analysis and the percentage of slope of the land in question.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220707152829.pdf

July 7, 2022
at 3:28 PM

Jazmine
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Jazmine (37931), July 8, 2022 at 3:58 AM

I vote against making this yard an agricultural area. I agree that lawn maintenance is something we're all responsible for. It comes with the home ownership responsibility as well as keeps the property values more accurate. It is inappropriate to make a change to one yard for the sake of omitting a regular home owner duty, which will effect so many other home owners in the area.

July 8, 2022
at 3:58 AM

7-I-22-RZ

Rebecca
37920

7-I-22-RZ
Rebecca (37920), July 8, 2022 at 3:44 PM

This land is adjacent to our property in the Serenity River subdivision. They have been good neighbors in the time they have lived on the property. Many zoning changes have taken place on Gov. John Sevier Hwy which will impact traffic and the country settings. The changes involve many, many houses being added to the area. I do not see why there should be any objection to the change being requested by Chase and Robyn Antonini.

July 8, 2022
at 3:44 PM

7-O-22-RZ

Chris
37931

7-O-22-RZ
Chris (37931), July 8, 2022 at 4:36 PM

That’s funny. Right down the road from Zion Rd. You know, the area you "dezoned" back to agricultural for the men’s boarding home. Guess the county can’t make up its mind on what like properties are!!!

July 8, 2022
at 4:36 PM

7-SB-22-C

Bob
37931

7-SB-22-C
Bob (37931), July 9, 2022 at 12:25 PM

Jenkins Road cannot handle the additional traffic that 22 planned lots would add. This should not be approved.

July 9, 2022
at 12:25 PM

Christine
3791

7-C-22-RZ
Christine ( 3791), July 10, 2022 at 7:19 AM

We oppose changing zoning because doing so moves the area in the opposite direction from where that area has been developing. 7-c-22-RZ

July 10, 2022
at 7:19 AM

7-C-22-PA

Alicia
37909

7-C-22-PA
Alicia (37909), July 10, 2022 at 9:19 PM

As an owner of a home property that borders the land being considered for rezoning, I am very concerned. I would like more transparency about what the rezoning, and possible future buildings, would mean for the quality of living for our neighborhood and all of the existing homes that will be directly effected.

July 10, 2022
at 9:19 PM

Rachel
3792

4-A-22-PD
Rachel ( 3792), July 11, 2022 at 1:08 AM

I have lived in south Knoxville a few blocks from this property for over 25 years. I support the planned development for two main reasons - Knoxville needs more affordable housing and this historic building should be preserved for adaptive reuse. Initially, I shared some of the concerns expressed by some neighbors, especially worse traffic. However, the compromise reached by the developer and the South Haven neighborhood has made me comfortable with the proposal. I commend them for working together on this.

July 11, 2022
at 1:08 AM

July 11, 2022
at 10:51 AM

Eric
37920

7-C-22-RZ
Eric (37920), July 11, 2022 at 10:51 AM

The Vestal Community Organization agrees with the Staff Recommendation denying the rezoning request. We maintain that the rezoning to I-H is not consistent with the surrounding development. We are a residential community with an Identity connected with the history and character of Vestal. The Candoro Marble building and surroundings help define Vestal. We wish to see the area preserved. The Vestal Community Organization has taken on projects to help us maintain our identity. We constructed an historical exhibit at the Mary Vestal Park Pavilion to recognize the Candoro Marble Building and the Vestal Lumber and Manufacturing Company along with the history of the area.

In addition, we have serious environmental concerns due to the property located in a Flood Plain with Goose Creek running through the property. The Vestal Community Organization has invested in protecting Goose Creek along with creating Goose Creek to be enjoyed by the public. The Vestal Community Organization took on removing invasive vegetation along Goose Creek and created a riparian zone to allow for protection of Goose Creek and public enjoyment of the area.

We have concerns that the current property owner has not served or considered the best interests of the Vestal Community. We do not believe proper consideration will be provided to the Vestal Community should this rezoning request be granted.

6-G-22-UR

Marj
37931

6-G-22-UR
Marj (37931), July 11, 2022 at 12:11 PM

In small print, the site plan states, "The area of Lot 1 will be used in calculating the total allowable density permitted for the development total." The 14.61 acre total is the size of the land purchase, not the land that will used for the development.

This 4.01 acreage (Parcel 1) is not part of and does not contain any portion of the actual building area and is being used solely to pad and justify building 95 homes on 10.60 acres.

Zoning regulations are meaningless if all a builder needs to do is buy additional land (that is either unbuildable or has no part of the building site) then add that extra land onto the application to justify a much higher density project.

The staff initially recommended denial to Medium Density Residential because it is not compatible with Low Density Residential, which surrounds the proposed plan on three sides.

This staff recommendation was denied because more housing is needed. Are zoning regulations meaningless as well?

July 11, 2022
at 12:11 PM

July 11, 2022
at 12:20 PM

Susan
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Susan (37931), July 11, 2022 at 12:20 PM

My concerns with this property is that the owners won’t keep up with the mowing and upkeep. As of now they have not done so, the past owner kept it mowed. They allow the grasses to grow upwards of 6 feet, which draws rodents. Though I realize they have over 4 acres in the county they are surrounded by family homes. I fight the mice constantly. I don’t believe its safe for the children who live nearby. Thank you for your time. Susan and Tim Crosby. Concerned neighbors.

7-B-22-SP

Benjamin
37902

7-B-22-SP
Benjamin (37902), July 11, 2022 at 1:30 PM

Applicant Correspondence Attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220711133015.pdf

July 11, 2022
at 1:30 PM

7-E-22-RZ

Benjamin
37902

7-E-22-RZ
Benjamin (37902), July 11, 2022 at 1:31 PM

Applicant Correspondence Attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220711133119.pdf

July 11, 2022
at 1:31 PM

Dax
37950

7-C-22-RZ
Dax (37950), July 11, 2022 at 1:47 PM

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220711134700.pdf

July 11, 2022
at 1:47 PM

Dax
37950

7-C-22-RZ
Dax (37950), July 11, 2022 at 1:50 PM

As the President of Candora Properties. I am asking that the property be returned to the original zoning code of I-H. As the property owner, I have never requested a change in its zoning, nor was I notified that it was or had changed. How can a property be rezoned without the owner's permission or notification? Who asked for the rezoning of the property to be changed from I-H to I-MU? The properties that are in line with Candora are all I-H. There is Rogers Group, Inc. (office and plant), SRM Concrete, David Witherspoon, Inc., and Alpha Industries, Inc. Candora properties also have other properties that are all I-H. The few I-MU are houses on Maryville Pike along with the Candora Office that we sold Knox Heritage and is now owned by the Aslan Foundation. I am asking that the property be changed back to the original zone as it has always been since zoning began in Knoxville.

July 11, 2022
at 1:50 PM

7-A-22-SP

Kyle
37919

7-A-22-SP
Kyle (37919), July 11, 2022 at 2:06 PM

I write on behalf of the Legacy Cove Homeowners’ Association. Our neighborhood is across the street from the lots under consideration for rezoning. We would point out that Neighborhood Commercial Zoning may not be a good fit for the property. That zoning, in part, contemplates retail and service establishments within a walking distance. Obviously, no one is going to walk to any establishment on Northshore. That said, given the current state of the property, we do not object to the rezoning, but will be very interested in the proposed use of the property, once rezoned. We would certainly oppose any use which would add materially to the already heavy traffic burden on that portion of Northshore.

July 11, 2022
at 2:06 PM

7-SC-22-C

Penny
37932

7-SC-22-C
Penny (37932), July 11, 2022 at 2:53 PM

"This proposal is for a 102-lot detached residential subdivision on 25 acres. The subject property was part of a 73-acre site rezoned to PR (Planned Residential) 1-2.5 du/ac in 2005 that was all under the same ownership as the current applicant (11-B-05-RZ). Over time, the applicant sold off approximately 47 acres. In 2020, a concept plan was approved for this same property and it was determined that the applicant still retains the development rights to the density on the acreage that was sold (1-SE-20-C / 1-I-20-UR). Because of this, the gross density for entire PR district is approximately 1.5 du/ac (110 lots on approx. 73 acres). The net density for the subject site is approximately 4.08 du/ac (102 lots on approx. 25 acres)."

If there are only 25 actual acres and the parcel is zoned for 2.5 du/acre, shouldn't there only be 62 homes permitted?

The way this report is written and the way this case is being handled appears shady, unethical and favor the developer, not the community, AGAIN. I look forward to hearing how you address this concern.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220711145314.pdf

July 11, 2022
at 2:53 PM

Sarah
37920

7-C-22-RZ
Sarah (37920), July 11, 2022 at 2:59 PM

I want to speak strongly against the proposal to rezone the Candora Marble Warehouses to "heavy industrial". This property and the neighborhood of Vestal would be detrimentally impacted by this change. Not only would this lead to additional dumping and destruction of the historic marble warehouses, it also would move the neighborhood in the wrong direction even as there is increasing interest in historic preservation, new businesses, and desirable housing stock within close proximity of this property. As someone who lives in the neighborhood, I ask that this rezoning request be denied.

July 11, 2022
at 2:59 PM

Julie
37920

4-A-22-PD
Julie (37920), July 11, 2022 at 3:45 PM

I would like to express my support for the development of Historic Giffin Square. Similar affordable housing apartments and complexes made it possible for me to support myself through higher education (through Ph.D.) and the beginning of my career. Further, many older family and friends remained independent after retirement due to these types of complexes. I will be happy to see this same housing offered in the south Knox area.

With respect to safety, I feel that the renovation of the old school property to an apartment/complex will greatly enhance the safety of the area. We often hear gun fire and other disturbing activity in the wooded area on that property, very close to our home . I believe much of this activity takes place due to their being no occupants currently. I feel the presence of tenants will bring more positive activity and lessen this issue.

As a natural resource manager, I am mostly concerned with sufficient stormwater mitigation and practices to protect Baker Creek. I hope to see some green infrastructure practices such as those at Suttree Landing Park (rain gardens, strips of permeable concrete, etc.) and a riparian buffer along Baker Creek.

Finally, I would like to express my excitement and support of the construction of a public sidewalk along McClung Street

July 11, 2022
at 3:45 PM

Sharon
37830

7-B-22-UR
Sharon (37830), July 11, 2022 at 4:25 PM

As a member of the West Knoxville Friends Meeting that owns the adjacent property, I am deeply concerned about the harm to our property that has ALREADY been caused by this proposal and further harm that may result from this development. Before this rezoning has even been approved, workers have trespassed on our property, desecrated our cemetery and removed several of our mature trees. These events are happening now, and some harms cannot be undone.

The development will also change normal drainage patterns that can affect groundwater as well as surface water. Storm channels for runoff may not address all the changes. Our property includes land immediately downhill from the proposed development that is used for community gardens, playground, and overflow parking. With any added drainage it is likely to become swampy, and would be unusable for its current purposes.

Without more concrete and enforceable protections for our property, I ask that the development be denied.

July 11, 2022
at 4:25 PM

Janson
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Janson (37931), July 11, 2022 at 8:10 PM

Due to the amount of adjoining properties that will be negatively impacted by the rezoning, I am against changing the property to agricultural. Lack of field upkeep and chickens as mentioned in other comments are already an issue I have had as well. Changing this property to an agricultural zone will significantly cause adverse effects to neighboring lots.

July 11, 2022
at 8:10 PM

Chris
37932

7-C-22-RZ
Chris (37932), July 12, 2022 at 9:27 AM

As an informed citizen that has been in this area all my life and worked in Vestal for more than 20 years, this rezone back to I-H is restoring it to its normal zoning from years ago. If you look at public facts this one small parcel was rezoned not long ago for unknown reasons. All the other property that surrounds this parcel is already and had been zoned I-H for years. Look at the records. The request from Candoro properties is looking/wanting to take it back to the history that it was. The history of Vestal is great and part of that history is also Rogers Group and before that Tennessee Asphalt that goes all the way back to the 50's. Remember, Candora Marble was heavy Industrial to begin with. Candoro properties has donated and helped this community. It has given marble to Mary Vestal Park for a monument, donated marble to Dogwood Elementary to note its history in this area. Candoro Properties cleans up and helps provide parking working with the Knox Heritage foundation, Candoro Arts and Heritage Center and the Aslen Foundation every year for Vestival.

So, returning the zoning to what is was originally just makes sense and it gives uniformity back to the area as all other parcels surrounding it are all I-H.

July 12, 2022
at 9:27 AM

Carolyn
37920

7-C-22-RZ
Carolyn (37920), July 12, 2022 at 2:11 PM

See attached pdf
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220712141125.pdf

July 12, 2022
at 2:11 PM

7-SA-22-C

Kevin
37918

7-SA-22-C
Kevin (37918), July 12, 2022 at 4:35 PM

This subdivision is another thermometer subdivision - cul-de-sacs with no connectivity to nearby streets.

When the property to the north had a Concept Plan, I submitted comments (https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/2020/may/correspondence/5-SD-20-C_5-L-20-UR.pdf) and stated:

5-SD-20-C - Beeler Rd - also lacks connectivity stub-out to the parcel to the south. Unfortunately when the Opportunity Ridge subdivision was platted, it did not include any stub-outs.

Accepting this Concept Plan from the applicant, without stub-outs, would be the third consecutive subdivision on this side of Beeler Road that does not provide connectivity.

The proposed Concept Plan does not meet the Standards for Street Connectivity set out in the Subdivision Regulations 3.04.C, specifically 2.b:

Providing for future street connections to adjoining undivided property. The proposed street system of a subdivision may be required to include street stub-outs for the logical extension of the street system into the surrounding area.

Please require the developer to provide street connections to the undivided parcel to the south.

Pertinent Subdivision Regulations and my comments on 5-SD-20-C from 2020 attached.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220712163531.pdf

July 12, 2022
at 4:35 PM

Paul
37931

7-B-22-UR
Paul (37931), July 13, 2022 at 7:33 AM

Mistakes have been made by government offices, contractors and others related to this development project. None of these actions were done by any of our members. An old survey was used to set survey pins, see attached photos, on our property, desecrating our burial ground and damaging our property. We cannot tolerate any further incursions and damages. The owner and developer of 7912 Jenkins Rd., as well as all government agencies, must do everything they can to ensure that nothing like this happens again ever, including future property owners. A substantial fence must be installed along our shared property line and maintained by the developer and covenants added to all property deeds to make the property line very clear and forbid any incursions onto WKFM property.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220713073311.pdf

July 13, 2022
at 7:33 AM

July 13, 2022
at 10:31 AM

Brandon
37902

7-C-22-RZ
Brandon (37902), July 13, 2022 at 9:23 AM

See attached document.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220713092333.pdf

July 13, 2022
at 9:23 AM

7-A-22-PA

Doug
37922

7-A-22-PA
Doug (37922), July 13, 2022 at 10:31 AM

Comments attached.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220713103132.pdf

July 13, 2022
at 11:34 AM

L. M.
37915

7-C-22-RZ
L. M. (37915), July 13, 2022 at 11:34 AM

See attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220713113428.pdf

July 13, 2022
at 11:39 AM

Beth
37920

4-A-22-PD
Beth (37920), July 13, 2022 at 11:39 AM

See attached File
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20220713113958.pdf

July 13, 2022
at 12:22 PM

Brady
37920

4-A-22-PD
Brady (37920), July 13, 2022 at 12:22 PM

I support this development because it will bring much needed affordable housing stock to South Knoxville. As a resident of the South Haven neighborhood, I want to see more affordable housing in my community that will allow folks to live here without breaking the bank. I have no concerns about increased crime or drug activity, and any arguments in that vein are simply misguided and wrong. We know that there is not enough housing stock to support people who want to live in Knoxville, and we also have a high homeless population. Projects like this can help alleviate some of the housing crisis we currently face. I appreciate the developers commitment to make this housing affordable for 30 years, and in fact would like to see an even longer time period if possible. 100 years or in perpetuity would be even better. I understand we rarely see agreements this long, but that's something that would benefit even more people. Finally, while this project will serve residents making between 60% and 80% of area median income, we need more housing that supports even lower-income individuals making 30% or less of AMI. I hope this development will serve as an example of affordable housing that can benefit the community, and spur more long-term affordable housing in Knoxville.

7-A-22-PA

Jennifer
37909

7-A-22-PA
Jennifer (37909), July 13, 2022 at 1:05 PM

KOC opposes the amendments because the medium density residential use is incompatible with a medical office park due to vehicular traffic

July 13, 2022
at 1:05 PM

7-D-22-SP

Jennifer
37922

7-D-22-SP
Jennifer (37922), July 13, 2022 at 1:07 PM

KOC opposes the amendments because the medium density residential use is incompatible with a medical office park due to vehicular traffic.

July 13, 2022
at 1:07 PM

Tiffany
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Tiffany (37931), July 13, 2022 at 1:37 PM

I am against rezoning of this property to agricultural use. I live in the adjoining subdivision and the current homeowners of this property do not maintain the property around the subdivision. Homeowners in our subdivision are dealing with overgrown fields and rat infestations that are interfering with the enjoyment of their homes. What will happen if this is rezoned and the property owners have free reign to place animals in areas next to homes and are not required to maintain the property? The feces run off would be into the subdivision backyards and into the two retention ponds that are also adjacent to this property. Homes downwind would impacted. You cannot guarantee that this will not happen and what can be done about it once it is rezoned?

Have there been any studies as to how this will impact those retention ponds? Why weren't all residents of the subdivision notified? This is going to negatively impact the entire subdivision. This will negatively impact home values. I am certain you would have received more comments if you had notified the entire neighborhood. I am typically for Agricultural use but based on the neighborhood's history with this property owner we fear it will only create more headaches for our subdivision.

July 13, 2022
at 1:37 PM

Johnny
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Johnny (37931), July 13, 2022 at 1:38 PM

Against rezoning to agricultural for all the reasons stated in other comments.

July 13, 2022
at 1:38 PM

Rima
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Rima (37931), July 13, 2022 at 2:08 PM

I share a fence with this property. I'm against the rezoning of this property to agricultural. The lack of yard maintenance is already affecting us negatively. Last summer I had much trouble controlling vermin and rodents that caused so much damage to my yard. I believe the problem will get worse if the agricultural zoning is approved.

July 13, 2022
at 2:08 PM

Brandon
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Brandon (37931), July 13, 2022 at 2:21 PM

I’m opposed to the zoning change for this area. As a resident of Hattie’s place subdivision, this zoning change will negatively impact the adjacent homes and potentially other homes in the neighborhood.

July 13, 2022
at 2:21 PM

Craig
37920

4-A-22-PD
Craig (37920), July 13, 2022 at 2:35 PM

I appreciate the detailed plan you have submitted for converting the historic Giffin school to a residence facility that would accommodate low income/working poor individuals. It's encouraging to see housing development that addresses the needs of that population. In my view, too little attention has been devoted by recent developers to create affordable living spaces for that population. Kind regards, Craig Wrisberg 2125 Spence Place Knoxville, TN 37920

July 13, 2022
at 2:35 PM

Nathan
37920

4-A-22-PD
Nathan (37920), July 13, 2022 at 2:53 PM

The current/modified Historic Giffin Square proposal is a vast improvement over the original development plan. As a direct neighbor of this property, I would still prefer a different use for it, but most of my strongest concerns have been lessened by (1) the reduced scale of the project and (2) protection of the mature hardwood forest. I commend the owners/developers for altering their proposal in response to neighborhood input.

I would ask the developers to request an exemption regarding the upper limit of permitted parking spaces. Although the proposal already greatly exceeds the minimum number required by zoning regulations, a miscalculation in the actual number needed will negatively impact the community. The street parking on the surrounding narrow streets is extremely limited and hazard-inducing. If cars are parked on either side of these roads, there is room for only one lane of traffic. Perhaps the proposal could have a designated area for putting in additional parking in the future, should it be necessary. Remember that the development includes a community meeting space, and extra parking will be required whenever that space is in use.

As an aside, the projected number of 7 new elementary school students seems far too low. This development creates 36 new two or three bedroom units. If only half of those have families with 2 elementary students, that’s an influx of 36 kids.

July 13, 2022
at 2:53 PM

Linda
37920

4-A-22-PD
Linda (37920), July 13, 2022 at 2:58 PM

I am commenting as a resident of the South Haven Neighborhood.

I support the proposed development for affordable housing. The South Haven Neighborhood is a Low/Moderate Income area and needs additional, quality affordable housing. I would like to see more opportunity for connections to the surrounding amenities in the neighborhood like a walking trail/ Greenway. I think there may be too much on-site parking.

I appreciate the developer being so responsive to neighbors' concerns.

July 13, 2022
at 2:58 PM

Angela
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Angela (37931), July 13, 2022 at 3:00 PM

Please do not rezone agricultural. It is important this grassy area remains well cared for including weekly mowing for the sake of all the families surrounding it.

July 13, 2022
at 3:00 PM

Sylvia
37922

7-C-22-RZ
Sylvia (37922), July 13, 2022 at 4:04 PM

I'm writing to speak against changing the current zoning for the Milani Warehouses on Candora Avenue. The proposal to change the zoning code to "heavy industrial" and permit the introduction of commercial material storage would change the quality of air from clean and tolerable to toxic and nauseous. If this happens, the recent addition of arts institutions and places that support visitors to the Vestal neighborhood would be negatively impacted.

Knoxville as a residential region is growing exponentially into a beautiful area where people from around the country are coming to live. Once described as a "scruffy little town", Knoxville has become a lovely city of green space that attracts those who love the arts, outdoor life, and other healthy pursuits. I came from Chicago to live in Knoxville many years ago, and I'm proud of our community and urge you to sustain the positive growth patterns by maintaining the quality of the air and beauty around this area.

I urge you not to change the present zoning designation and permit more toxic pollution.

July 13, 2022
at 4:04 PM

Nicole
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Nicole (37931), July 13, 2022 at 5:42 PM

I live in the neighborhood adjacent to this potential rezoning and am very much against this change. The property is not maintained as it is so I do not want to see what becomes of it if their classification changes. Furthermore, we bought our homes in the neighborhood because of the surrounding area. When looking into what could be allowed under the change, it would decrease our property values and potential desirability. Please do not approve this change.

July 13, 2022
at 5:42 PM

Kelly
37931

7-V-22-RZ
Kelly (37931), July 13, 2022 at 5:54 PM

I do not agree with making this an agricultural property. It is too close to homes and neighborhoods where families enjoy playing outside and taking walks. It will not be enjoyable to step outside of their homes to smell bad odors.

July 13, 2022
at 5:54 PM

July 14, 2022
at 11:35 AM

John
37909

4-A-22-PD
John (37909), July 13, 2022 at 6:33 PM

I very much support this proposal - Knoxville needs to work hard to increase affordable housing, and this proposal has been developed with listening and response to neighbborhood concerns. So it's a good one.

July 13, 2022
at 6:33 PM

7-O-22-RZ

Vickie
37931

7-O-22-RZ
Vickie (37931), July 14, 2022 at 11:35 AM

I am new to this process and would request this be on taken off the consent agenda so I can speak at the meeting today.

The side of our home of over 30 years is located very close to the common property line adjacent to this proposed development. We have (2) specific requests to be attached to the rezoning approval today and they are the following:

1. The peripheral building setback would be a minimum of 50 feet adjacent to our common property line.

2. We also request that a minimum 8 foot tall Green Giant Arborvitae be placed along our common property line within 150 feet of our home at 10 feet on center.

July 14, 2022
at 11:53 AM

Gayle
37920

4-A-22-PD
Gayle (37920), July 14, 2022 at 11:53 AM

As the President of the South Haven Neighborhood Association I have been asked to speak on the forum we provided for Community Communication concerning the Giffin Elementary Development Project at 1834 Beech St. SHNA with David Chockrill and David Chase have devoted the major portions of 4 monthly meetings to this project's discussions. We also participated in an additional Saturday meetings announced through Social Media and all welcomed. In addition, David Cockrill offered individual appointments to anyone who needed to speak to individual concerns.

With over 37 community members participating, a list of 34 concerns was established and presented to the Giffin Developers. From this, more discussions results in the revised plans presented today. Major changes were made.

SHNA's goal was to offer a neutral and open forum for all views. We were able to use our member email list , Giffin Neighbors email list and social media to share all the meeting times, plans, concerns and revisions with the community.