Public Comments

November 13, 2024
at 1:58 PM

Kim
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Kim (37918), November 13, 2024 at 1:58 PM

The city / county should not be adding this many residences in a very small area without widening Tazewell Pike and adding additional traffic controls and turning lanes all along Tazewell Pike from Murphy Road to Broadway St. This stretch of road is already extremely congested and nearly impossible to travel during morning and evening rush hour. The city / county has not made any street improvements to accommodate the current population growth as it is, and therefore no medium to large subdivisions or apartment / condo complex projects should be approved until the city / county has made the necessary upgrades to accommodate current and projected population growth.

10-I-24-RZ

Connie
37914

10-I-24-RZ
Connie (37914), September 25, 2024 at 3:49 PM

Neighbors from the Asbury Ramsey Area
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240925154930.pdf

September 25, 2024
at 3:49 PM

November 13, 2024
at 2:09 PM

Sandy
37938

11-J-24-DP
Sandy (37938), November 13, 2024 at 2:09 PM

Enough is enough. Look at what this man and his business has already brought to this community. Look at the quality or should we say substandard quality of his development. Look at the track record of his past developments in even a short term 5 year plan. This community has already endured enough. Postpone this decision.

10-C-24-DP

Gayle
37920

10-C-24-DP
Gayle (37920), September 27, 2024 at 9:20 AM

I'm a concerned citizen scared to death about the reckless development without proper support and safety concerns. Please prevent overcrowding and poisoning of our soil and water ways. You have a professional and moral obligation to stop this from occurring. I hope you wait until TDEC tests the site for public safety before zoning and residential housing.

September 27, 2024
at 9:20 AM

September 29, 2024
at 12:04 PM

Marcie
37920

8-A-24-DP
Marcie (37920), September 29, 2024 at 12:04 PM

I have given my opinion on this forum before but because it has been delayed I need to voice my dread on this build. Crenshaw is way to small to carry this much traffic. You can not just widen a small part when they will be using the whole street. This is a busy road because the whole community uses it to get to John Sevier. It's not much more than a 1 lane road that has needed work for years. Please consider the road problem before advancing on an approval.

Steve
37920

8-A-24-DP
Steve (37920), July 31, 2024 at 1:22 PM

Chrenshaw is a very narrow road. The additional traffic will require better intersections at Chrenshaw and 33 and also Chrenshaw and 168. It is already very busy and those exiting onto Chrenshaw from 33 north exit much too fast and will be very dangerous for the residents of the complex entering Chrenshaw. I think a better plan is to enter and exit onto a third lane on John Sevier, like this do entering onto John Sevier from Chrenshaw.

July 31, 2024
at 1:22 PM

Jennifer
37920

8-A-24-DP
Jennifer (37920), July 31, 2024 at 1:32 PM

Concerns of having so many addtional families trying to use such a small residential road in addtional to the current traffic. WhY can they not have a turn off from Maryville Pike?

July 31, 2024
at 1:32 PM

August 1, 2024
at 5:49 PM

Marcie
37920

8-A-24-DP
Marcie (37920), August 1, 2024 at 5:49 PM

I live right off Crenshaw. The traffic will be too much for a 1 1/2 lane road. It's going to be a nightmare for us living on or off Crenshaw.

November 13, 2024
at 3:52 PM

Randall
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Randall (37918), November 13, 2024 at 3:52 PM

In regards to the properly in question, I have several concerns/questions.

1. The drainage on the property needs to be carefully protected as it eventually drains onto our property at Bradford. Runoff from the surrounding hillsides runs down onto this property and eventually drains off into drainage ditches that cross our development. With this property being undeveloped, the water is allowed to soak in gradually before the excess runs onto our development. Developing this property will reduce the ability for water to soak in and thereby cause a greater chance of flooding in Bradford.

2. In considering the traffic that already exists on Tazewell, adding any additional traffic will only lead to more congestion than we already see. More cars anttem to turn left into this development will add to the numerous backups we already see on Tazewell, especially at peak times.

Appreciate your consideration for these two important points in developing said property.

7-A-24-SU

Mary Jo
37912

7-A-24-SU
Mary Jo (37912), August 2, 2024 at 11:36 AM

See attached document regarding my concerns about this proposed development.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240802113604.pdf

August 2, 2024
at 11:36 AM

November 13, 2024
at 6:14 PM

Stacy
37914

11-J-24-DP
Stacy (37914), November 13, 2024 at 6:14 PM

I am concerned about the infrastructure for this area being able to keep up with the amount of homes being added. We have hardly any shops in this area and my kids who are in middle and high school now have went through their whole academic career in schools that are some of the oldest in Knoxville . Additionally all have trailers to house students already. Will new schools and stores be added to accommodate this growth?

November 13, 2024
at 10:05 PM

Sarah
37914

11-J-24-DP
Sarah (37914), November 13, 2024 at 10:05 PM

Please do not approve the building of ao many residential properties. Our community cannot handle that type of growth. Our schools are crowded as it is. Please reconsider this plan and protect our community

November 14, 2024
at 7:58 AM

Mark
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Mark (37918), November 14, 2024 at 7:58 AM

For all of the well-documented facts presented here by many concerned residents and citizens, I strongly oppose the rezoning request of the property at 5027 Tazewell Pike. I am a 25+ year resident of Mont Richèr Subdivision and see first-hand that this property is not suitable for the revised 5 units per acre, much less the original request for 10 units per acre. I encourage the Planning Commission to deny the applicant’s rezoning request in favor of the safety of the community and to avoid the many problems noted in the numerous comments.

November 14, 2024
at 8:40 AM

Jill
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Jill (37918), November 14, 2024 at 8:40 AM

I have lived here for the past 30 years, and I oppose this zoning change. My reasons include: (1) Tazewell Pike traffic has reached an all-time high! There is so much traffic on Tazewell Pike, and safety is a bigger issue. Not only has it become more dangerous, delays are more frequent because of accidents. Backups seem normal. Unfortunately, there was a fatality in front of my subdivision Mont Richer' within the last year. The blind curve is extremely dangerous. This new addition would hinder this area of traffic. (2) Sink holes and flooding make this property prohibitive no matter how many units (5 or 10). (3) The large apartment complex across the street from this property would create a more dangerous traffic situation on a two lane road. It’s extremely dangerous with waiting autos turning into the complex. The proximity of units in a rural area increases the danger to an intolerable level.

10-C-24-DP

William
37920

10-C-24-DP
William (37920), October 2, 2024 at 9:54 AM

We have had several large developments on J Sevier, Tipton Sta, Maryville Pk, which have impacted our community, and already overcrowded schools. There does not seem to any control/restrictions for the sizes of the subdivisions. Horton has a reputation for cheap housing and Clayton builds modular homes. Oh, it's just South Knoxville, right? I feel as if we have been adding "trailer parks" to our once scenic highway and community as a whole, as well as loss of forests, and compromising watershed. The last quality subdivision was a few years ago with Gideon's Landing. There are persons who would buy better quality housing if it was offered. Please reconsider controlling the size of subdivisions, and the frequency of construction. This is a get rich quick for the developers, with no concern for community residents and environmental impact whatsoever.

October 2, 2024
at 9:54 AM

November 15, 2024
at 5:01 PM

Ed
37932

11-B-24-UR
Ed (37932), November 15, 2024 at 5:01 PM

As other commenters have stated, the very existence of fuel tanks that close to the lake and sinkholes prevalent is a disaster waiting to occur. This company has no regard to the wishes of the neighborhood or with people who use Second Drive. Of all the things that could go on this property this is the least attractive, wanted, or needed. This thing needs to go away for good. Say no.

November 20, 2024
at 8:56 AM

Sharon
37934

11-B-24-UR
Sharon (37934), November 20, 2024 at 8:56 AM

I strongly encourage members of the planning commission to drive to the proposed EZ Stop site and then through our village. Letters from residents cannot adequately convey traffic concerns or the need for construction of some kind of concrete barrier keeping vehicles from turning into Old Concord from the gas station. Decisions the commission makes regarding this community should not be made simply by looking at a map.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241120085603.pdf

12-SB-24-C

Erin
37931

12-SB-24-C
Erin (37931), November 26, 2024 at 4:55 PM

No more subdivisions should be built until the road and traffic issues are addressed. We no longer feel like a community but just a bunch of random subdivisions connected by tiny roads. City/comminity planning needs to be addressed. A greenway or side walk is necessary for the community.

November 26, 2024
at 4:55 PM

12-SE-24-C

Denise
37938

12-SE-24-C
Denise (37938), November 27, 2024 at 4:34 PM

No! This road cannot handle more traffic. Turning out of and into Brackett from Emory has always been dangerous. With the additional number of housing units being built on Brackett currently and all along Emory Road this is an accident waiting to happen. Please stop. No more.

November 27, 2024
at 4:34 PM

November 28, 2024
at 5:03 PM

Dwain and Martha
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Dwain and Martha (37918), November 28, 2024 at 5:03 PM

This is to express additional concerns that further substantiate our strong objections to the rezoning request. As a matter of procedure, how can the planning staff make any recommendation regarding the request at this phase of the rezoning process? Much preliminary work should be done before any decision is made, and the staff should shift a lot of that responsibility to the developer. The impression is that the staff is relying upon very broad, generic, and unspecified data that are not related to the proposed siteâs topographical and environmental features. The absence of an accurate correlation can result in wrong impressions and bad decisions. Please see additional document.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241128170306.pdf

November 29, 2024
at 8:47 PM

Todd
37934

11-B-24-UR
Todd (37934), November 29, 2024 at 8:47 PM

The public notice signs were removed weeks ago for this proposed development. Although these were posted prior to the previously schedule meeting, the developer postponed to the next meeting and then promptly removed the public notice signs, effectively minimizing public awareness of this development. This was also done the last time this development was brought to the commission. These signs should be reposted as soon as possible to gain true public input.

December 1, 2024
at 2:52 PM

Kevin
37918

12-C-24-DP
Kevin (37918), December 1, 2024 at 2:52 PM

Applicant should provide a written description of what will occur in "AMENITY & COMMON AREA #1"

December 1, 2024
at 8:17 PM

Misty
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Misty (37918), December 1, 2024 at 8:17 PM

Please see attached objection to rezoning of 11-I-24-RZ
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241201201742.pdf

December 2, 2024
at 3:34 PM

Chelsie
37912

12-G-24-RZ
Chelsie (37912), December 2, 2024 at 3:34 PM

I am actively working to mitigate water runoff from the slope on my property. If the trees on this parcel are removed, it will not only eliminate the natural sound barrier but also significantly increase water runoff. Before approving the development of this land, I urge you to carefully consider the impacts on drainage, increased road noise, and the potential need for an additional traffic light on the already congested Clinton Highway.
To address these concerns, I recommend limiting the housing density, maintaining a narrow treeline between neighborhoods, and ensuring proper drainage solutions, such as retention ponds, if necessary. These measures are essential to protect both the environment and the quality of life for current and future residents.

December 2, 2024
at 5:09 PM

Terri
37912

12-G-24-RZ
Terri (37912), December 2, 2024 at 5:09 PM

Please, please, please consider that every time you have approved building above our subdivision. It has flooded the creek that passes down the middle of the subdivision. It floods up into homes basement and across the road. It erodes the ground and were have original trees fall from roots being shallow due to erosion. I know it does not effect you but it does effect our beautiful little neighborhood. Please put yourself in the place of these homeowners that have lived as children and continue as adults in these homes only to be flooded out because you chose to give people with money the right to build with little to no caring for who and how it effects others.

December 3, 2024
at 2:39 PM

David
37932

12-C-24-DP
David (37932), December 3, 2024 at 2:39 PM

Please see attached questions for the commissioner regarding the Traffic Impact Study
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241203143933.pdf

December 3, 2024
at 10:10 PM

Amber
37912

12-G-24-RZ
Amber (37912), December 3, 2024 at 10:10 PM

Please be considerate of those living in the neighborhood when you are making decisions. We enjoy our tucked away, quiet area. If this area is built up, I hope it is separate from our neighborhood with no cut through. We do not want traffic cutting through to get around Clinton Highway. Many people bike, walk, and run and we do not want any cut through traffic making our roads less safe.
I am concerned that the noise barrier provided by the trees will be taken away, leaving our neighborhood less enjoyable. I am further concerned that there will be more flooding. When the businesses were buil along Clinton Highway, it caused flooding issues that homeowners had to deal with. When construction was started up behind Hobby Lobby, we again had flooding issues - this time on the other side of the street.
Please be thoughtful and courteous for those of us living here.

December 4, 2024
at 1:49 PM

Kevin
37918

12-C-24-DP
Kevin (37918), December 4, 2024 at 1:49 PM

Attached is a summary of rezonings and developments approved in this vicinity since 2019, including the trip counts that were provided in the reports. They total more than 15,000 estimated daily trips, with many of those on Sam Lee Rd.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241204134934.pdf

12-SB-24-C

Kelsey
37932

12-SB-24-C
Kelsey (37932), December 4, 2024 at 2:45 PM

This subdivision is too many homes for Hardin Valley with the current road structure and school situation. This will bring too many people to the area, which is not prepared for this amount of people. If there needs to be a subdivision, it should be 1 home per acre, as Hardin Valley used to be. The infrastructure needs to be changed until this should be built. In addition, there are MANY homes being built in Hardin Valley that are not being sold. These houses need to sell before more should be built. This community is being overwhelmed with unsold houses and apartments.

December 4, 2024
at 2:45 PM

December 4, 2024
at 3:26 PM

Kimberly
37923

12-C-24-DP
Kimberly (37923), December 4, 2024 at 3:26 PM

Please do something about the traffic/roads before buidling any more new homes. I encourage anyone that supports this to take trip towards HV schools between 7:45 - 8:30 and again from 3:30 - 4:30 every day. There isn't a traffic cop that helps these students navigate the traffic and nothing has been done about it. Or anywhere in that area. Sam Lee is awful during those times as well. I'm sure adding these new homes will definitely help the traffic situation. Try teaching your child to drive/navigate that area. It's horrid. Address the roads before building new homes.

December 5, 2024
at 8:06 AM

Teresa
37932

12-SD-24-C
Teresa (37932), December 5, 2024 at 8:06 AM

I am very concerned about these being built so close to such a steep hill. All of the water is going to run down that hill and flood my property. I am asking you to protect my property when making decisions. I should not have to worry about damage to my home because someone is looking to make the most money possible. I ask that you please put yourself in my place when making decisions. Thank you

December 5, 2024
at 9:49 AM

Janice
37932

12-SD-24-C
Janice (37932), December 5, 2024 at 9:49 AM

The Braxton Creek neighbors are extremely concerned about this development because we are “downhill” from this development. We see no drainage plan. We want to request any drainage be routed away from Braxton Creek.

12-E-24-DP

Janice
37932

12-E-24-DP
Janice (37932), December 5, 2024 at 9:50 AM

December 5, 2024
at 9:50 AM

December 5, 2024
at 10:04 AM

William
37934

12-SD-24-C
William (37934), December 5, 2024 at 10:04 AM

I would like consideration of my deep concern regarding the current level of available documentation for this project. I believe that it’s reasonable for additional engineering evaluation to occur relative to stormwater management, Hillside protection/erosion, wooded and natural vegetation elimination, and impact to adjacent residential properties. I do not believe that the planning commission should approve this plan to go forward until better evaluation and communication occurs with all those impacted.

12-E-24-DP

William
37934

12-E-24-DP
William (37934), December 5, 2024 at 10:06 AM

December 5, 2024
at 10:06 AM

11-C-24-DP

Kevin
37918

11-C-24-DP
Kevin (37918), December 5, 2024 at 12:53 PM

Needs to incorporate stub-outs to property on the north and the east to facilitate future connections, as this is in the Planned Growth Area. No more thermometer subdivisions please.

December 5, 2024
at 12:53 PM

December 5, 2024
at 1:43 PM

Kevin
37918

12-C-24-DP
Kevin (37918), December 5, 2024 at 1:43 PM

Attached is the TDOT Inventory and Appraisal Report page for the Swafford Road bridge over Beavercreek.
The report recommends widening the bridge, with a 2020 cost estimate of $496,000.
Source: https://www.tn.gov/content/tn/tdot/structures-/inventory-and-appraisal/inventory-and-appraisal-reports.html - the "Off System" PDF for Knox County.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205134319.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 1:57 PM

Kevin
37918

12-C-24-DP
Kevin (37918), December 5, 2024 at 1:57 PM

The applicant should be required to have a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified arborist before a grading permit is issued, and the grading permit and concept plan should require implementing the recommendations of the tree preservation plan. See https://extension.psu.edu/a-guide-to-preserving-trees-in-development-projects for
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205135755.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 2:59 PM

Jessica
37721

12-B-24-RZ
Jessica (37721), December 5, 2024 at 2:59 PM

I do not support this request. If you note the current surroundings, this property is already zoned at the appropriate du/acre. Direct surroundings suggest 1-2, with 3 being the absolute max. This road is a narrow road, and cannot support 5 du/acre. I would suggest the infrastructure being drastically improved before entertaining an increase in du/acre. Please visit this road and site before making a decision as In my opinion, it’s already at the appropriate zoning and should not be increased.

December 5, 2024
at 3:22 PM

Kevin
37918

12-C-24-DP
Kevin (37918), December 5, 2024 at 3:22 PM

Regarding tree protection: I contacted foresters at UT Extension and UT Facilities. They strongly recommend a publication from the International Society of Arboriculture:
Best Management Practices - Managing Trees During Construction, Third Editionhttps://wwv.isa-arbor.com/store/product/139/

December 5, 2024
at 3:57 PM

Wally
37932

12-SD-24-C
Wally (37932), December 5, 2024 at 3:57 PM

The proposed Black Road Development does not appear to have an adequate drainage plan for the additional runoff from all the condo roof tops, driveways, and roadways. If stormwater drainage is routed to the nearby sinkhole, it could result in groundwater pollution, additional limestone washout or plug the bottom and cause additional runoff to existing drainage ways. The development is located on a ridge top or side slopes which can increase washout potential. The extensive tree and vegetation removal will also increase this problem.

December 5, 2024
at 4:00 PM

Kristan
37721

12-H-24-DP
Kristan (37721), December 5, 2024 at 4:00 PM

Emory Rd can not take the traffic it has now and their idea to help with that is a turning lane. So the people who live on Emory now have to give up some of their property for a turning lane and more money in y'all pocket. The amount of people you all have pushed out here is ridiculous! The roads are over crowded and the schools are over crowded. We are not west knoxville if we wanted ti live like that we'd move. Stop trying to bring west knoxville to corryton we don't want it.

12-E-24-DP

Wally
37932

12-E-24-DP
Wally (37932), December 5, 2024 at 4:03 PM

December 5, 2024
at 4:03 PM

December 5, 2024
at 5:28 PM

Kevin
37918

12-H-24-DP
Kevin (37918), December 5, 2024 at 5:28 PM

This plan needs to have stub-outs for connectivity to adjacent lots, which could be done by eliminating lot 21 or 22. There needs to be a tree preservation plan required before issuing a grading permit. The tree preservation plan should be prepared by an ASCA Consulting Arborist, and then adhered to during the grading and construction phase.

12-F-24-DP

Dustin
37931

12-F-24-DP
Dustin (37931), December 5, 2024 at 5:47 PM

Hello I have concerns about the plans to build a gas station/car wash just down the street from my house. After looking at the maps associated with this case it came to my attention that this new building will be just a few hundred feet from my house, I am also currently on well water and have concerns that the detergents and chemicals from the underground storage of gasoline and car wash cleaning supplies may effect my drinking water.

December 5, 2024
at 5:47 PM

December 5, 2024
at 6:58 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 6:58 PM

*Attached as a file for clarity. I will also be submitting visual aids that help clarify my talking points. Unfortunately, I will have to submit these one at a time. I apologize if that is confusing, but they will be organized and in folders for your review at the hearing. Thank you

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205185804.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:24 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:24 PM

Floodplains in Knoxville, Tn
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205192436.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:25 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:25 PM

Impervious Surface in Knoxville, Tn.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205192535.pdf

10-C-24-DP

Victoria
37920

10-C-24-DP
Victoria (37920), October 16, 2024 at 12:54 PM

Please contact Chrissy McNaughton about this property

Chrissy McNaughton, PhD | East Tennessee Regional Manager, Knoxville Field Office
Division of Remediation
3711 Middlebrook Pike
Knoxville, TN 37921
Cell: (865) 863-0270
Christina.McNaughton@tn.gov

Dr. McNaughton acknowledged reading the attachment, researching and now identified this property as one of concern, and gave this for TDEC's attorneys to review. It would behoove Knox County Planning Commission to not approve this rezoning at the upcoming meeting. I think the best move in the interest of all parties impacted (Schuberts, DR Horton, and the contiguous neighbors) would be deferment of this vote until TDEC does an investigation.

Review this DEED RESTRICTION that:

"no dwelling house or building of any description to be used as a dwelling house will be erected or located on the property to be hereinbelow described closer to the now existing powder magazines of the Atlas Powder Company than the dwellings that are presently located on the said property to be hereinbelow described. This covenant and restriction is to run with the following property in whomsoever the title may be vested."

Thank you kindly for your consideration to defer the vote on 10-C-24-DP Location 2814 Tipton Station Road.

October 16, 2024
at 12:54 PM

December 5, 2024
at 7:26 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:26 PM

Impervious Surface in Knoxville, Tn.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205192625.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:27 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:27 PM

Tree Canopy in Knoxville, Tn. overlayed with impervious surface
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205192745.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:29 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:29 PM

Knoxville tree canopy overlayed with impervious surface and floodplains
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205192944.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:31 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:31 PM

Current development of "The Ridge" at Neal's Landing
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193101.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:31 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:31 PM

Current view from Vista View. 141 houses being constructed for " The Ridge" at Neal's Landing
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193158.pdf

October 22, 2024
at 8:10 AM

Amy
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Amy (37918), October 22, 2024 at 8:10 AM

Narrow entrance to this property for multi development along with already 3 large developments entrances within feet of this proposed development ? The entrance is in a blind spot for travelers coming down Tazewell Pike. There are no turning lanes on Tazewell Pike for any of these developments. Also the bad curve coming from the East and proximity of other large entrances so close together.

December 5, 2024
at 7:32 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:32 PM

View from construction of "The Ridge" at Neal's Landing
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193240.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:33 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:33 PM

Density of houses that have been constructed so far, five to six dwelling units per acre.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193326.pdf

October 24, 2024
at 2:44 PM

Gary
37934

11-B-24-UR
Gary (37934), October 24, 2024 at 2:44 PM

see attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241024144450.pdf

December 5, 2024
at 7:34 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:34 PM

Floodplains around Asheville Highway housing developments, including proposed parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193420.pdf

7-SE-24-C

Ryan
37931

7-SE-24-C
Ryan (37931), June 21, 2024 at 9:29 PM

Byington Beaver Ridge Rd is a narrow 2 lane State Route and last year saw an average daily traffic count of 9,630 cars. It's 35 mph posted limit is routinely disregarded substantially and has been the host of multiple fatal traffic accidents. You will show NO DUE REGARD to the safety of current residents if you shoehorn 21 additional lots into a backyard and call it a subdivision. There is no infrastructure to support such lunacy. The proposal should be laughed out of the room. The lot has VERY little road frontage (just barely 200'), and it would be an engineering marvel to add the required access road to feed a new subdivision of 21 additional lots where there is just barely room for one driveway. Because of old growth trees, typical to the original home construction, traffic visibility is poor and would be a recipe for disastrously bad crashes. The current utilities are NOT adequate, as there are constant outages and repairs on the water mains which are stressed by capacity and age. The developer has turned this formerly beautiful lot into an eyesore and a landfill, growing a bumper crop of old appliances, garbage, and construction debris for almost 2 years now. Please don't allow developer greed to rule this decision, please take into account the safety of the current residents on this road. Please make the right choice and deny this proposal.

June 21, 2024
at 9:29 PM

October 24, 2024
at 10:04 PM

John
37934

11-B-24-UR
John (37934), October 24, 2024 at 10:04 PM

The proposed EZ Stop project in Concord still needs to have a completed archeological survey. The adjoining cemetery may have burial plots under the proposed site. Also, people who drive north from the North shore roundabout, continue to turn onto Lakeridge or 2nd Street and cut through to Olive Road. They drive fast, ignore stop signs (personally observed), drive erratically towards pedestrians walking on Olive Road (personally observed), and it will be a hundred times worse if EZ Stop is allowed to build. Concord is an Historic and peaceful community. Let's keep it that way!

December 5, 2024
at 7:35 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:35 PM

Tree canopy around Asheville Highway housing developments overlayed with current impervious surface. Includes proposed parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193534.pdf

7-C-24-DP

Ryan
37931

7-C-24-DP
Ryan (37931), June 21, 2024 at 9:31 PM

June 21, 2024
at 9:31 PM

October 24, 2024
at 10:55 PM

Stephanie
37934

11-B-24-UR
Stephanie (37934), October 24, 2024 at 10:55 PM

My family and fellow community members of historic old concord strongly oppose the requests of the EZStop developers/owners. As stated previously, the neighborhood is mostly one lane roads without room for traffic caused by the gas station. The suggested “right turn only” sign, is not enough to discourage drivers from entering our streets. I encourage you to observe the “right turn only” stop leaving starbucks at Campbell station. Within minutes, you would observe minimum three vehicles ignoring the signage and turning left onto Campbell station. The only solution is a right turn concrete median on the second st exit. We would also request that there is a minimum amount of pumps as to keep the site smaller and less noise pollution (and vehicle pollution) to our attached neighborhood.

December 5, 2024
at 7:36 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:36 PM

Tree canopy around Asheville Highway developments overlayed with impervious surface and floodplains. Includes proposed parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193659.pdf

October 24, 2024
at 10:56 PM

Rena
37922

11-B-24-UR
Rena (37922), October 24, 2024 at 10:56 PM

I grew up in Farragut and hate to see more unnecessary progress to the "Old Concord" area.

Also, there will be no easy way to turn left on 2nd Dr, only an exit onto Concord Rd; further the 200+ yr old Cemetery boundary intrusion at the Masonic Lodge will be negatively affected.

December 5, 2024
at 7:38 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:38 PM

Parcel ID 62 047 and another development plan being proposed over Shining Creek
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205193838.pdf

October 24, 2024
at 11:00 PM

Tissie
37934

11-B-24-UR
Tissie (37934), October 24, 2024 at 11:00 PM

Ruining our history and our community with UGLY, and intrusive development is not the way Farragut residents need or want. The current submission of EZ Stop plans for a gas station, the large amount of gas pumps, the intrusion on the Masonic Cemetery, and preventing the ability for traffic to gain access to 2nd Drive as an exit or shortcut is unacceptable.

December 5, 2024
at 7:41 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:41 PM

Parcel ID 62 047 is the only remaining open green space. Forested area near Asheville Highway has already been zoned as CA (a general business zone)
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194106.pdf

October 24, 2024
at 11:37 PM

Cindy
37934

11-B-24-UR
Cindy (37934), October 24, 2024 at 11:37 PM

Why would anybody want a convenience store at this location??? There is already so much traffic you can't get anywhere. The round-about already causes so much confusion and backed up traffic! Can't we just save a little natural earth for this once quaint little community?

December 5, 2024
at 7:42 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:42 PM

Parcel ID 62 047 Native Meadow with goldenrod, ironweed, and broom sedge. Surrounded by trees- early fall
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194236.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 6:32 AM

Jennifer
37934

11-B-24-UR
Jennifer (37934), October 25, 2024 at 6:32 AM

Stop EZ Stop from building at 2nd Dr in historic Concord area! This area does not need a gas station in its location due to the following reasons:

* the amount of gas pumps be lessened in size & amts

* NO ability to turn left on 2nd Dr, only an exit onto Concord Rd

* Save the 200+ yr old Cemetery boundary intrusion at Masonic Lodge

ALSO-please think about strategic planning when allowing gas stations in areas due to traffic and accidents as well as does it make sense? In this case the traffic would increase accidents and people have multiple other options for gas within a short distance.

December 5, 2024
at 7:44 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:44 PM

Parcel ID 62 047 native meadow in late fall- provides late season food for local wildlife.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194402.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 8:12 AM

Gina
37922

11-B-24-UR
Gina (37922), October 25, 2024 at 8:12 AM

I don't understand why this gas station has to in such a historic area. That area is not capable of handling so much traffic added to what is already there. I grew up in this area and my Mother still lives off Hughlan Dr. There are plenty of gas stations and restaurants in the area while historic areas are being transformed into commercial areas. No good

December 5, 2024
at 7:45 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:45 PM

Goldenrod in full bloom at Parcel ID 62 047 Fall
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194510.pdf

7-SE-24-C

Cynthia
37931

7-SE-24-C
Cynthia (37931), August 9, 2024 at 8:08 PM

The posted speed limit on Byington Beaver Ridge Road is 35, but 45-50 is normal. Pulling out onto this road is dangerous enough for the existing residents on this section of road, but to add 18 homes (which according to the estimated daily traffic impact is 219 trips Mon-Fri only) using one entrance/exit to do it is reckless. There have been multiple deaths on this road, not to mention wrecks without fatal injury in recent years. Slowing down to pull into your driveway is dangerous, and you risk your life every time you pull out. People either speed and don't pay attention or sit in stand-still traffic due to the backup from the underpass. The water main has broken twice in the 4 years we have lived here, and the additional strain of 18 new homes? A recipe for disaster. With any heavy rain, there is standing water on the road directly in front of the property. Also, adding a road that crosses a natural drainage path behind the existing house (and multiple existing houses on that side of the street) poses a serious concern. They have conveniently tidied up the property before each of the hearings before the planning commission, but during the drawn out year and a half renovation to the existing home, the property has been an eyesore and a complete disaster. I cannot imagine how they will manage the construction of 18 new homes and the chaos that will bring for many years to come. The location of this project is a tremendously bad idea.

August 9, 2024
at 8:08 PM

October 25, 2024
at 8:18 AM

Tina
37934

11-B-24-UR
Tina (37934), October 25, 2024 at 8:18 AM

I live very close to the proposed gas station on Concord Road. I am very concerned about the noise that it will bring to our residential area. While I would like for the gas station to not be allowed at all, I would like at the very least for it to be much smaller. The current businesses near us do not create traffic or noise. I am surprised that a developer does not want to build homes or condos in this location.

December 5, 2024
at 7:45 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:45 PM

Deer browsing in meadow at parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194550.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 8:43 AM

Pebby
37934

11-B-24-UR
Pebby (37934), October 25, 2024 at 8:43 AM

Quit trying to build [redacted] on our neighborhood.

December 5, 2024
at 7:46 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:46 PM

Parcel ID 62 047 Mowed but can see the significant slope- winter
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194636.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 12:23 PM

Robin
37934

11-B-24-UR
Robin (37934), October 25, 2024 at 12:23 PM

This is regarding the gas station petition. Over development is ruining out small town. The main objections are: * they are requesting far too many pumps for the area. Not suitable or fitting of the surroundings. * there is no ability to turn left on 2nd Dr, only an exit onto Concord Rd * We have to protect the 200+ yr old Cemetery boundary intrusion at Masonic Lodge

December 5, 2024
at 7:47 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:47 PM

Red-tailed hawk overlooking meadow for food, over parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194734.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 12:46 PM

michael
37772

11-B-24-UR
michael (37772), October 25, 2024 at 12:46 PM

My family is buried next to this proposed gas station. This would be abysmal to anyone who has relatives buried there. Not to mention the traffic already sucks in this area when I go to Kroger to get groceries. Are you trying to drive people away from this area?

December 5, 2024
at 7:48 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:48 PM

Coyote in meadow at parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194826.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 2:44 PM

Jody
37922

11-B-24-UR
Jody (37922), October 25, 2024 at 2:44 PM

There will be too much congestion and traffic in an already busy area!!!!

December 5, 2024
at 7:49 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:49 PM

Great blue heron at 205 North Wooddale Rd., near current house on parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205194935.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 9:18 PM

Cliff
37922

11-B-24-UR
Cliff (37922), October 25, 2024 at 9:18 PM

I would like to express my concerns regarding the proposed EZ Stop on Concord Rd adjacent to the Concord Historic District. The original proposal was eventually removed because the concept was not appropriate for this area. The size of the store has been reduced, but 14 pumps is not necessary. That many pumps would cause a chaotic situation on an already busy road with limited access. The residence of Concord requested right only turn-out onto Second Drive to prevent “cut through” traffic in a residential area with very narrow streets. This location backs up to a historic cemetery and Masonic Lodge and should require an archaeological survey. This area was used as encampment during the Civil War. Further reason for the survey. The residence of Concord and Knox County are very proud of this historic district. Please protect this piece of history.

December 5, 2024
at 7:50 PM

Joseph
37924

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37924), December 5, 2024 at 7:50 PM

Proposed conservation area for parcel ID 62 047
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241205195055.pdf

October 25, 2024
at 9:26 PM

Staci
37934

11-B-24-UR
Staci (37934), October 25, 2024 at 9:26 PM

That area is way way way to overpopulated by way of traffic already! It's always congested! Usually backed up beyond belief! Accidents constantly! We have enough retail in that area as well as gas pumps that we do not need another quick mart kind of place. Not only does that bring in additional crime. I don't care what you say. It does but unnecessary congestion that road cannot be widened at all due to the lake ! therefore, putting in the monstrosity that is being proposed and unwanted is going to do absolutely positively nothing but create more problems than can ever be rectified! We do not want that in Farragut/Concorde It was voted down once what makes anyone think we would want it just because it was re-filed Buy a bunch of money, hungry individuals that are not from here!! We've dealt with enough over development from a local named Bud Culllom and we do not need any outsiders, jumping on the same type of bandwagon!

December 5, 2024
at 8:26 PM

Terri
37721

12-B-24-RZ
Terri (37721), December 5, 2024 at 8:26 PM

I live on shipe road about 1/2 mile from this property. Shipe road is a quiet neighborhood and already has houses being built all around it. We bought this property 30 years ago because of the open and the peaceful areas. I understand that progress is inevitable, but 5 houses on one acre takes away from the country feeling. There are two very sharp curves less than 1/4 mile from this property that already makes it dangerous. The schools in this area are being pushed to the limit with all the subdivisions coming in. I work in a school in the mascot area, and we are already at our limit. Please consider the neighbors that have lived and loved this area for years, and don't want a large subdivision in our neighborhood. Thank you, Terri Kopp

October 26, 2024
at 12:14 PM

Eve
37934

11-B-24-UR
Eve (37934), October 26, 2024 at 12:14 PM

I want to go on record warning about traffic problems already existing close to the northshore ttaffic circle. Ez stop stated tey wanted to "capture" traffic. Everyone i talk to at the davis ymca and at church- feel the traffic jam caused by this will end in someones death. The commuting is fast and can back up quickly. Now farragut will be installing utility updates along concord rd too. At what point do we destabilize an economy with too much development?? Think soberly about this responsibility. Sacrificing historic concord with excess gas pumps and excess traffic down a one lane rd is an abuse of residents and church goers no one ever used their private property rights to hurt people on purpose- like this How much money will ever be enough if you bring a facility too big and intrusive to be justified ! Quality of life is nothing to callously disregard

December 5, 2024
at 8:26 PM

Wes
37938

12-H-24-DP
Wes (37938), December 5, 2024 at 8:26 PM

I am not against growth by any means but something has got to be done with Brackett Road itself. Brackett Rd is pretty much 1 1/2 cars wide from Emory Road to Bell Road. The Construction Traffic the Development that is being completed next to this has destroyed the Road. The Ingress and egress at Brackett and Emory is a death trap. If you are exiting from Emory to Brackett and the same time someone is exiting from Brackett to Emory Road you have to wait for traffic to clear as 2 cars can not fit on Brackett Road. I would strongly request the committee to drive out here about 7:30 am or 5:00 pm and attempt to turn onto Brackett from Emory as well as Exit From Brackett to Emory to fully understand. It is right under a blind hill as well. Traffic needs to be routed to Bell Rd and a Red Light w Turn Lanes installed at Emory and Bell Rd. That was discussed qnd a lot of road work was to take place with the current development already underway but i guess that was all just an embellishment. Brackett Road Resident

October 26, 2024
at 4:12 PM

Natalie
37934

11-B-24-UR
Natalie (37934), October 26, 2024 at 4:12 PM

Concord Road and Northshoreis already too crowded.

No left turn allowed

December 5, 2024
at 9:57 PM

Kathleen
37918

12-H-24-DP
Kathleen (37918), December 5, 2024 at 9:57 PM

I have never been more frustrated with the roads/traffic situation and no one is listening. Our community is being completely ruined in large part because the infrastructure is absolutely not adequate. Emory road is bumper to bumper during peak hours and left hand turns are very unsafe. Please stop ruining our quality of life by limiting our mobility even more.

October 26, 2024
at 6:28 PM

Mary
37325

11-B-24-UR
Mary (37325), October 26, 2024 at 6:28 PM

There is already too much congestion at this intersection and there is plenty of gas available nearby. Another way to ruin the ambience of the area

December 6, 2024
at 6:44 AM

Melinda
37938

12-H-24-DP
Melinda (37938), December 6, 2024 at 6:44 AM

I am against this development. Brackett Road/Majors Rd/ Bell Rd. CANNOT sustain any more traffic! In most of this area, the roads can barely be called 2 lane and it is difficult to pass another vehicle coming from the other direction without one or the other coming to a complete stop. We cannot just keep putting houses in this area without infrastructure to sustain it! I am algo concerned about how this proposal will affect Lammie Branch and do not see anything about that here. It affects my subdivision as well and flow should be maintained. Please vote NO on this proposal for all of us who already live here. And please take the time to drive the aforementioned roads yourself so that you can see the possible affect on our area. Thank you!

October 26, 2024
at 9:46 PM

Charlene Hall
37934

11-B-24-UR
Charlene Hall (37934), October 26, 2024 at 9:46 PM

Allowing the EZ Stop to be built here will cause impingement to the historic former church site, as well as to the Cemetery. There are unmarked graves in the proposed construction area, and we already have limited road access to the Cemetery. We do not need additional obstructions. Further, placing a convenience store in this spot would promote vandalism to the Cemetery and create even more traffic snarls on heavily traveled Concord Road.

December 6, 2024
at 7:50 AM

Katy
37721

12-H-24-DP
Katy (37721), December 6, 2024 at 7:50 AM

Development is obviously inevitable, but you have to start investing in our infrastructure. If giant neighborhoods continue to be built, then roads and schools must also be improved/enlarged. Emory Road and Tazewell Pike are both carrying highways worth of traffic in two narrow lanes with no shoulders. Accidents happen daily; lives are lost most weeks. There is absolutely no law enforcement of speed limits. Do better, Knox County!

October 28, 2024
at 12:23 PM

D
37933

11-B-24-UR
D (37933), October 28, 2024 at 12:23 PM

Please see attached. Thank you
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241028122324.pdf

December 6, 2024
at 8:53 AM

Hannah
37721

12-H-24-DP
Hannah (37721), December 6, 2024 at 8:53 AM

Corryton CANNOT handle any more traffic. The roads are not meant for the volume and it’s already overcrowded. Not to mention, the schools are not meant for this many people either. We do not need or want anymore homes in Corryton! This is a small town and we want to keep it as such.

October 28, 2024
at 5:36 PM

Mark
37934

11-B-24-UR
Mark (37934), October 28, 2024 at 5:36 PM

Thank you for considering my comments.

Once again I must take the time to submit my comments 11-B-24-UR, the Jason Voorhees of applications. This gas station is a business that is clearly not wanted by the families living in the adjacent neighborhood. This is not the appropriate type of business for this neighborhood. There are so may other businesses that would be welcomed. But we get stuck with a gas station. It will not generate new business or increase revenue. It will only take business from existing businesses. The only person to benefit will be the owner, and that will be at the expense of the rest of us.

So I must ask, why do we go through these processes when so many of these applications get approved regardless of the wishes of the people that will have to deal with it daily? What recourse do we have? Some in the neighborhood will inevitably hire a lawyer to try to stop it again. If that doesn't work, then it will probably get built. No one will be happy but the business owner and maybe some guy wanting a Honey Bun. If it does work, then the applicant will just reapply, and the process repeats.

So how about this time let's show a little courage here and reject this application for the people. What do you say?

11-D-24-SU

Tammie
37771

11-D-24-SU
Tammie (37771), December 6, 2024 at 10:59 AM

Members of the Board of Directors of the KCWRT will be in attendance at the meeting.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241206105901.pdf

December 6, 2024
at 10:59 AM

October 28, 2024
at 5:58 PM

Karen
37934

11-B-24-UR
Karen (37934), October 28, 2024 at 5:58 PM

We have been through this once! Why again?Farragut has enough congestion without starting another area!

December 6, 2024
at 2:09 PM

Kellan
37721

12-H-24-DP
Kellan (37721), December 6, 2024 at 2:09 PM

I highly suggest any one considering this as a “good idea” to drive tazewell pike… or any one of the narrow 2 lane roads with no shoulders on any given day between the hours of 7-9am and then again from 2-6 pm and please let me know if you think another 70 houses (figure 2 people from each home drive) 140 new cars on this road during rush hour. Not against growth but we NEED to have he infrastructure for it. There isn’t even a grocery store in Corryton.

October 28, 2024
at 6:58 PM

Mary
37934

11-B-24-UR
Mary (37934), October 28, 2024 at 6:58 PM

I am writing on behalf of our community regarding concerns about the potential increase in traffic by vehicle coming in and out of Old Concord Village. Obviously we do not want the gas station restaurant due to increased noise, traffic and artificial light. If we cannot stop this awful structure that does not fit our community/Village at least install a concrete barrier to keep people from driving through our quiet village by placing a concrete barrier with a left turn only back to Concord Rd. so we do not have additional traffic driving through the neighborhood.

December 6, 2024
at 2:53 PM

Kathy
37721

12-B-24-RZ
Kathy (37721), December 6, 2024 at 2:53 PM

I am Kathy Rhyne, and the property in question borders our driveway for several hundred feet.
This is a difficult area to pull out of due to the curvy and narrow Shipe Rd. We already have so much traffic. Itâs very difficult to get out in the mornings onto Washington Pike. In the afternoons, traffic is backed up trying to get off of I 640 E. onto the Washington Pike exit, most days as far as Kohls!
To allow another subdivision with so many more cars will endanger everyone , children , walkers and drivers.
There is also New Hope Christian school, which causes congestion every day as parents drop their children or pick them up. There is no bus for New Hope.
I will be at the meeting next Thursday, but please consider denying approval for such a large subdivision!

December 6, 2024
at 3:55 PM

Kerri
37938

12-H-24-DP
Kerri (37938), December 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM

Brackett Road cannot sustain the amount of traffic with the recent addition of the adjacent subdivision. Adding another will truly cripple this small street. The road itself has also been badly damaged by the construction and needs repairs. Motorists are swerving to avoid holes and nearly hitting others head on. I am also a school teacher in the Gibbs community, and our schools are bursting at the seams. We cannot keep up with this amount of growth. I also have concerns about the environmental changes this will cause to Lammie Branch creek and wildlife.

October 29, 2024
at 8:07 PM

Terry
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Terry (37918), October 29, 2024 at 8:07 PM

This property borders Bradford Place on Tazewell Pike. There is a spring and two creeks on this property that cause flooding across properties and on to Tazewell Pk. I addition to water / runoff concerns, traffic is also a huge concern. Tazewell Pk cannot take any increased traffic. It's bumper to bumper traffic now!

December 6, 2024
at 4:41 PM

Todd
37934

11-B-24-UR
Todd (37934), December 6, 2024 at 4:41 PM

See attached for details on why I strongly encourage the planning commission to deny the âuse permitted on reviewâ due to the failure for the proposed use to meet the requirements adopted in the Knox County Code of Ordinances. A denial decision as set forth in Appendix A â Zoning, article 4 and article 6, is allowed and strongly supported because of, but not limited to, the following reasons:
1 The use is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning regulations; and
2 The use is inconsistent with adopted plans and policies, including the general plan and the sector plans; and
3 The use is incompatible with the character of the neighborhood where it is proposed, and with the size and locations of buildings in the vicinity; and
4 The use will significantly injure the value of adjacent property by noise, lights, fumes, odors, vibration, traffic congestion or other impacts which may detract from the immediate environment; and
5 The use is of a nature and so located as to draw substantial additional traffic through residential streets; and
6 The nature of development in the surrounding area is such as to pose a potential hazard to the proposed use and create an undesirable environment for the proposed use.
The recommended approval conditions by the planning staff do not bring this development in compliance with the ordinances and cause further concern with the development being forced into an area not suitable for this type of development.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241206164142.pdf

October 30, 2024
at 11:02 AM

Susan
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Susan (37918), October 30, 2024 at 11:02 AM

As someone who has lived here a dozen years, I oppose this zoning change. My reasons are three fold. (1) There is already to much traffic on Tazewell Pike and this will further impede safe driving. There has already been one fatality in front of my subdivision Mont Richer' within the last year. (2) The property is known for water retention and sink holes. This is due to a natural spring that makes building that many units prohibitive. (3) The apartment complex across the street from this property would create a dangerous traffic situation on a two lane road. The proximity of that many units in a rural area increases the danger to an intolerable level.

December 7, 2024
at 4:37 PM

Randy & Theresa
37721

12-B-24-RZ
Randy & Theresa (37721), December 7, 2024 at 4:37 PM

Our house and property is adjacent to the proposed site in question. If the Zone passes for Shipe Road it will be detrimental to the established neighborhood, create stress for area wildlife and the narrow country road. This area would not be able to handle the influx of traffic created by 5 units per acre on a small stretch of road connecting to Washington Pike. Across is a small Christian school named New Hope that barely has enough parking spaces for members and family dropping off students. Additionally, students that attend area public schools walk on Shipe Road without a sidewalk, stop in front of New Hope as this is the bus stop for Knox County. Children play on Shipe Road as well and we feel this is unsafe with extra traffic. We hope you will deny the proposed density up to 5 du/ac.

October 31, 2024
at 11:42 AM

Gary
37934

11-B-24-UR
Gary (37934), October 31, 2024 at 11:42 AM

Other items that need to be addressed in the plans are: 1. Post constructions contours should be addressed to show how the sink hole will be covered. Knox County does allow construction over sink holes., 2.Note on map C201 says "detention ponds will be allowed to discharge to TDOT system as long as peak flow rates are less than pre-developed peak flow." Since the proposed gas station lies within the sink hole area, this enclosed basin does not drain (by definition of a basin) consequently there is no (zero) peak flow off site. The TDOT and/or TDEC must address this discharge situation.

December 7, 2024
at 8:38 PM

Seth
37912

12-G-24-RZ
Seth (37912), December 7, 2024 at 8:38 PM

I respectfully urge you to reconsider approving the proposed land development near my home due to significant environmental and community concerns. The project could severely impact local drainage, exacerbating flooding risks in our area. The removal of existing vegetation and natural features will compromise the landâs ability to absorb rainwater, leading to increased runoff and potential flooding of surrounding properties, including mine. This could put our homes at risk and increase the burden on local infrastructure. Additionally, the development threatens the natural tree line that serves as an essential sound barrier, protecting our neighborhood from noise pollution. These trees provide not only aesthetic value but also a layer of privacy and tranquility that would be lost if they are demolished. The destruction of this green space will affect both the environment and the quality of life for residents. I implore the committee to prioritize the protection of our communityâs safety, natural resources, and well-being by rejecting this development proposal. Please consider alternative solutions that do not disrupt our environment or our way of life. Thank you for your attention and understanding.

August 28, 2024
at 10:15 AM

Kevin
37921

9-A-24-SU
Kevin (37921), August 28, 2024 at 10:15 AM

I think it's a good idea to have a garage on this end of Chapman Hwy especially with all the shops run down to the other end of Chapman Hwy. I think it will be a great idea because people with car troubles on this end could stop by and get some help

October 31, 2024
at 12:21 PM

Nancy
37934

11-B-24-UR
Nancy (37934), October 31, 2024 at 12:21 PM

There were 15 modifications that EZ-Stop was mandated to correct at the end of the first meeting of the Zoning Meeting. Those concerns need to be binding on the modifications for filing the second proposal. Those include, but are not limited to: 1. a Concrete Island at the exit to Second St that directs all traffic on Second Dr. to the right toward Concord Rd., 2. Archelogical report on the border with the Historical Cemetary to look for unmarked graves and border encroachment onto Cemetary property., 3. Geological report that Sinkholes exist under the proposed build., 4. The Building in keeping with zoning at 5000 sq ft or less., 5. Too many gas pumps in keeping with a residental surrounding (other gas stations in the area have 3-4 islands). Other questions about the current drawing: 1. What is the purpose of the signage on Second Dr. on the SE corner? It is a 30'x30' sign that say "Local Deliveries Only" on the edge of Historic Concord Village? EZ-Stop would profit from fitting in with the local environment instead of looking like an Interstate gas station.

12-A-24-SU

Patti
37912

12-A-24-SU
Patti (37912), December 7, 2024 at 9:58 PM

Why here. Merchants Road is covered up already with all kinds of people. Donât go out at night because itâs not safe anymore. In the mornings, it looks like the walking dead on Merchants and yes they spread out all over. Restaurants and businessâ have closed left and right but nooooo you have to put something else to draw them into this area. Someone decided this is the area we will push them to. Buses drop off people a lot at Ingles on Cedar Lane. We see themâ¦suitcases and all. They donât know where they are and walk through the neighborhoods and into the woods all around. This used to be a really good place to live, work and play in your yards but not anymore. By all means push more on us but donât push towards all the other areas that ARE still untouched by this mess. I am all for helping druggies and alcoholics but there has to be a limit to the stresses that are put on CITY AND COUNTY TAX PAYERS! We deserve better than this! Rant over but still disgusted! Do better, you work for the tax payers!

December 7, 2024
at 9:58 PM

August 28, 2024
at 11:36 AM

Richard
37914

9-A-24-SU
Richard (37914), August 28, 2024 at 11:36 AM

Would be a benefit to the community bring employment and opportunity to others

12-SE-24-C

Theodore
37938

12-SE-24-C
Theodore (37938), December 8, 2024 at 7:05 AM

Although progress and development is not necessarily a bad thing, adding thus many residences without proper infrastructure development is disastrous. Brackett Road itself needs to be updated, and E. Emory Road from Maynardville Pike through Corryton needs to be widened and have some traffic control (ie- traffic signals) to regulate the flow and safety for safety of all that travel it. This road is already inadequate for the amount of traffic, and has numerous accidents annually (some fatal) that TDOT and Knox Country need to manage proactively.

December 8, 2024
at 7:05 AM

December 8, 2024
at 3:52 PM

Sharon
37721

12-B-24-RZ
Sharon (37721), December 8, 2024 at 3:52 PM

Fix the traffic problems first!! Geez too many new builds and narrow lanes!! Fix the roads to accommodate more housing! Ridiculous Knox planning approving the traffic/wrecks etc!!

August 28, 2024
at 4:28 PM

Joesette
37920

9-A-24-SU
Joesette (37920), August 28, 2024 at 4:28 PM

This is a really great car company and it will increase employment opportunities. And also more space for auto repairs.

October 31, 2024
at 9:54 PM

Gary
37934

11-B-24-UR
Gary (37934), October 31, 2024 at 9:54 PM

Other items that need to be addressed in the plans are: 1. Post constructions contours should be addressed to show how the sink hole will be covered. Knox County does not allow construction over sink holes., 2.Note on map C201 says "detention ponds will be allowed to discharge to TDOT system as long as peak flow rates are less than pre-developed peak flow." Since the proposed gas station lies within the sink hole area, this enclosed basin does not drain (by definition of a basin) consequently there is no (zero) peak flow off site. The TDOT and/or TDEC must address this discharge situation.

December 9, 2024
at 8:40 AM

Joseph
37902

12-D-24-RZ
Joseph (37902), December 9, 2024 at 8:40 AM

Se attached... proposed conservation easement acreage and aerial view.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241209084017.pdf

August 28, 2024
at 4:33 PM

Sparkle
37920

9-A-24-SU
Sparkle (37920), August 28, 2024 at 4:33 PM

We needed for the community. It's so convenient for neighborhood and employment.

November 1, 2024
at 5:26 AM

Matthew
37924

11-J-24-DP
Matthew (37924), November 1, 2024 at 5:26 AM

Just want to say again i'm against this development. We have too much traffic on our roads as is. This is adding way too much more traffic to the area that our roads can't support. Also there are tons of wildlife that live in the woods and area you are destroying. Leaving them no where to go is a bit absurd. There still should be some sort of tree line and wildlife area these creatures can go. Bears, Rabbits, Deer, and much much more. Tearing this entire area up to cram 100's of houses in one area is quite absurd. I request this be re-considered and some housing areas be removed to keep a wildlife area for the wildlife around the area to go. Also it looks like you are putting property lines on an easement my family created so that the houses on the hill had access to their homes. This was put there so my cousins could access their home. I'm not sure it's legal to be building homes on this easement. This was suppose to be there for our family. Not for public use and most certainly not to build on. Part of my property was taken to build this easement.

12-B-24-OB

R. Bentley
37902

12-B-24-OB
R. Bentley (37902), December 9, 2024 at 8:47 AM

See attached Sanborn Maps from 1903, 1917, and 1924.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241209084705.pdf

December 9, 2024
at 8:47 AM

August 28, 2024
at 5:53 PM

Clay
37714

9-A-24-SU
Clay (37714), August 28, 2024 at 5:53 PM

I think we need garage around here. A lot of car lot not garage. More employment

November 1, 2024
at 11:40 AM

Ken
34

11-B-24-UR
Ken (34), November 1, 2024 at 11:40 AM

Mike, I just wanted to let you know that although the building size has been reduced, we in the Historic Concord community still oppose this project. When we appealed their plan to the zoning board the board commented this project was not congruent with the neighborhood. This has not changed. We still feel it is too many gas pumps and the exit onto 2nd drive should built to not allow left turns at all. Also the study should still be made in regard to possible grave sites on the property before any approval is made. Please take these matters into consideration before approving a project of this nature.

12-C-24-OB

R. Bentley
37902

12-C-24-OB
R. Bentley (37902), December 9, 2024 at 8:48 AM

See attached Sanborn Maps from 1903, 1917, and 1924.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241209084851.pdf

December 9, 2024
at 8:48 AM

August 28, 2024
at 6:00 PM

Donovan
37920

9-A-24-SU
Donovan (37920), August 28, 2024 at 6:00 PM

In my opinion we need more locally owned and operated shops here in knoxville who do good business with the community and help the little guy I would rather car conexxion expand than for another set of apartments spring up please help us help the little guys.

November 1, 2024
at 12:23 PM

Todd
37934

11-B-24-UR
Todd (37934), November 1, 2024 at 12:23 PM

Plan not in harmony with lighting zoning regulations 4.10.10 & 5.38.14

In conflict with the zoning regulations, the 14 elevated lights above pumps notated as "A" on the Lighting Proposal are configured with a "Forward Throw" which direct light into the historic village and residential zones.

Additionally, the color temperature of the exterior lighting is specified at 5,000 Kelvin. This color emits harsher and excess blue and green emissions from LEDs. This leads to increased light pollution, as these wavelengths scatter more within the eye and have detrimental environmental and glare effects. This conflicts with 4.10.10 and 5.38.14 of the Knox County Code of Ordinances.

Propose to limit the hours of operations & require light off by 10:30 PM due to the close proximity to residential lots.

9-A-24-HPA

Benjamin
37902

9-A-24-HPA
Benjamin (37902), December 9, 2024 at 12:06 PM

Applicant Correspondence
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241209120605.pdf

December 9, 2024
at 12:06 PM

August 28, 2024
at 6:08 PM

Ethan
37920

9-A-24-SU
Ethan (37920), August 28, 2024 at 6:08 PM

The garage is convenient and close, and offers employment opportunities. We can't wait !!

9-G-24-SU

Benjamin
37902

9-G-24-SU
Benjamin (37902), December 9, 2024 at 12:06 PM

Applicant Correspondence
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241209120652.pdf

December 9, 2024
at 12:06 PM

August 28, 2024
at 6:29 PM

Robert
37920

9-A-24-SU
Robert (37920), August 28, 2024 at 6:29 PM

It would help a local business owner grow his business in our south knox area and help the look of the property

November 1, 2024
at 5:23 PM

Mona I.
37772

11-B-24-UR
Mona I. (37772), November 1, 2024 at 5:23 PM

My comments and justifications for them are very lengthy and submitted via pdf file. The following is a summary:

-Clarification of encroachment on Concord Masonic Cemetery
-Size of property to be encroached
-Legal source used for the encroachment
-Do not allow encroachment onto Concord Masonic Cemetery property
-Require architectural survey of boundary between proposed development and Concord Masonic to ascertain if unmarked graves are present
-Do not allow loud speaker communications at drive through or walk up window
-Prohibit left turn egress from Second Drive by installing a physical barrier to prevent vehicles from entering in that direction
-Clarify the intention to Widen Second Drive, i.e. development area only or the entirety of Second Drive
-Do not widen Second Drive along Masonic Cemetery Property
-Place a traffic light at Second Drive and Concord Road to allow left hand turns
-Document the height of the building within the site plan
-Determine if a variance would be necessary to allow for canopy of fuel pumps that would increase the size of the building
-Verify signage for Monument Sign that is follows the visibility triangle measurement system
-Verify that the Monument face size does not exceed 5 feet
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241101172305.pdf

11-A-24-RZ

Benjamin
37902

11-A-24-RZ
Benjamin (37902), December 9, 2024 at 12:08 PM

Applicant Correspondence
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241209120803.pdf

December 9, 2024
at 12:08 PM

November 2, 2024
at 4:28 AM

Jonathan
37934

11-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), November 2, 2024 at 4:28 AM

THE USE WILL DRAW ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THROUGH RESIDENTIAL AREAS. The residents are asking for the proposed Second Drive exit to be a true right-out only exit with concrete curbing to prevent left turns as a condition to mitigate additional traffic through the residential area.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241102042857.pdf

December 9, 2024
at 12:09 PM

Benjamin
37902

11-B-24-UR
Benjamin (37902), December 9, 2024 at 12:09 PM

Applicant Correspondence
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241209120933.pdf

August 29, 2024
at 10:32 AM

Donald
37920

9-A-24-SU
Donald (37920), August 29, 2024 at 10:32 AM

Help is good for our community I love to have it and have a local guy on a business right there to serve the community

November 2, 2024
at 11:05 AM

Mona
37772

11-B-24-UR
Mona (37772), November 2, 2024 at 11:05 AM

My prior comments inaccurately used the term architectural survey. I mean to type archeological survey. Thank you for considering my error. Comments have been resubmitted with correction.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241102110503.pdf

August 29, 2024
at 10:32 AM

Narjia
37738

9-A-24-SU
Narjia (37738), August 29, 2024 at 10:32 AM

Yes!!! It would be a local business and give us more job availability!!! This would be really beneficial!

August 29, 2024
at 10:36 AM

Shameika
37738

9-A-24-SU
Shameika (37738), August 29, 2024 at 10:36 AM

The development of car connexions garage would be a great establishment at its location. I have been visiting this shop for several years and it has provided great and affordable services at a convenient location. It would be a great establishment for the surrounding community at large as this development would not just service current customers like myself but will attract people of the neighborhood and new customers and also provide employment opportunities for the people within the area of study and expertise.

November 2, 2024
at 4:42 PM

Gary
37934

11-B-24-UR
Gary (37934), November 2, 2024 at 4:42 PM

A raised concrete median with mountable curb as described on Map C101 should be constructed at drive way “B” exit onto 2nd drive. This would allow for only right hand turns to prevent unnecessary traffic into the Concord Historic District. Or the drive way should be totally eliminated mainly for safety issues and if not for the respect to the historic neighborhood. As described in no. 2 of the side notes of Map L101, “the northern 1/3 of the parcel shall be developed by others in the future.” The current zoning is CN (neighborhood commercial). Does the current land use request affect this area? The northern 1/3 area should remain as CN since no development is proposed under this request.

November 3, 2024
at 8:02 AM

Toby
29646

11-B-24-UR
Toby (29646), November 3, 2024 at 8:02 AM

This note pertains to the proposed EZ Stop development at Concord Road and Second Drive in west Knox County. I personally have strong feelings about maintaining the character of the Concord Masonic Lodge and Cemetery that are adjoining the proposed EZ Stop. I have many of my people buried there; and also own three burial plots that I will eventually use. Allowing vehicles to exit the EZ Stop onto Second Drive will desecrate the hallowed feel and history of the Masonic cemetery. Just as importantly, increased traffic on Second Drive will likely destroy the remaining blocks of Old Concord. That road is narrow and not constructed for many vehicles, or especially through trucks serving the store. Please don't allow this development to destroy what little remains of historic West Knoxvile.

August 29, 2024
at 11:19 AM

Tara
37915

9-A-24-SU
Tara (37915), August 29, 2024 at 11:19 AM

We need more local shops this would be a great addition ... We would love to support this business in moving to our area

November 3, 2024
at 1:32 PM

David
37934

11-B-24-UR
David (37934), November 3, 2024 at 1:32 PM

1. As was discussed in the Planning Meeting and Use on Review, this project is not appropriate to the atmosphere and historic significance of Historic Concord. Concord is the only historic overlay in Knox County outside of the city limits. 2. Entering and exiting will be hazardous due to the speed and traffic on Concord Road. 3. There should be no left turn out of EZ Stop onto Second Drive. Point #2 above addresses the reason for concern. Drives will cut through Old Concord to avoid entering Concord Road. Traffic through the village is not in keeping with Point #1. Also, narrow streets with many walkers and kids on bikes make increased traffic very dangerous. 4. I am not in favor of the number of gas pumps EZ Stop is proposing. The whole scale is simply too large.

November 3, 2024
at 2:20 PM

Carol
37934

11-B-24-UR
Carol (37934), November 3, 2024 at 2:20 PM

EZ Stop's 5,000 sq.ft. building complies with CN Zoning but the canopy and 14 pumps make the project too big for the location. Knox County does not seem to have clear regulations on pump limits, but that part of the property should compliment the building size., not over power it. Please abide by public sentiment by requiring them to decrease the canopy size and number of pumps. Eliminate the outlet onto Second Drive. A situation exists at Weigel’s,1405 Lovell Rd, where planners approved a side exit onto Deerbrook so drivers can avoid heavy traffic on Lovell. It increases traffic on Deerbrook when cars and trucks cut through to Parkside. Planners will be encouraging fueling tankers and cars to cut through a residential community if you allow the outlet onto Second Drive. EZ Stop needs to present a better plan.

August 29, 2024
at 12:37 PM

Barry
37918

9-A-24-SU
Barry (37918), August 29, 2024 at 12:37 PM

This location would be ideal for a local automotive repair shop that will service the local community and provide affordable repairs and local jobs. I know the owners personally and their family and they bring value and culture to the area and should be allowed to expand their business.

November 3, 2024
at 6:26 PM

Laura
37934

11-B-24-UR
Laura (37934), November 3, 2024 at 6:26 PM

I would like to submit my comments opposing the EZ Stop development on Concord Road. While I appreciate EZ Stop finally submitting a smaller building size, the number of pumps and the canopy that covers them is still too large. The Board of Zoning Appeals initially denied this project because it did not fit the neighborhood and surrounding community, which is the purpose of the Neighborhood Commercial zoning put in place by the county. This project still does not fit the community, even with the smaller building.

August 29, 2024
at 1:42 PM

Kelly
37924

9-A-24-SU
Kelly (37924), August 29, 2024 at 1:42 PM

This would be a great asset to the community in terms of needed services and employment opportunities.

November 4, 2024
at 9:02 AM

Shirley
37934

11-B-24-UR
Shirley (37934), November 4, 2024 at 9:02 AM

This proposed gas station/fast food development will result in the permanent desecration of the historic Concord Masonic Cemetery which is the sacred resting place of many area pioneer families and their descendants. The prospect of this inappropriate development is heartbreaking for those whose loved ones are buried there, some in unmarked graves which will certainly be encroached upon. Please have the courage to deny this devastating project. There are more appropriate uses for this property.

August 29, 2024
at 3:06 PM

Clement
37931

9-A-24-SU
Clement (37931), August 29, 2024 at 3:06 PM

It's very good idea good for creating job

August 29, 2024
at 5:00 PM

Ashley
37920

9-A-24-SU
Ashley (37920), August 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM

This is a great buisness that is great price espically intodays times. There are not alot of machanics in the area that are trustwortly. They add to this community and would onlly add more vaule and help to this south knox community.

August 29, 2024
at 5:19 PM

Sandra
37920

9-A-24-SU
Sandra (37920), August 29, 2024 at 5:19 PM

We need this garage in this area

November 4, 2024
at 1:44 PM

Brenda
918

11-I-24-RZ
Brenda (918), November 4, 2024 at 1:44 PM

I am concerned about the amount of water that flows on this property and the properties that join it. Property is very low. Hard rain causes water to stand in the rear of this property and the land around it which are private residences. Also the traffic on Tazewell Pk. In this area is already very heavy. Tazewell Pk. Is two lanes and already has several roads in a very small distance turning onto it. There are no turn lanes and speeding is a problem.

November 4, 2024
at 5:37 PM

Rebecca
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Rebecca (37918), November 4, 2024 at 5:37 PM

I am against this rezoning. This area consists of 11 acres. The requested rezoning is to place 10 du/ac per acre. That would result in up to 110 apartments on 11 acres. The traffic is obviously a major problem, but esthetic changes to our beautiful area will also not be positive. Single family property will decrease in value. In the quest for builders to profit and increase housing, this tract of property is not a best option for the proposed rezoning. I encourage those in leadership positions to consider the homeowners who reside in this area and say no.

September 2, 2024
at 1:13 PM

Bradley
37920

9-A-24-SU
Bradley (37920), September 2, 2024 at 1:13 PM

Have had work done here before they need to expand. A new garage would help the south knoxville community

November 5, 2024
at 3:32 AM

Jonathan
37934

11-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), November 5, 2024 at 3:32 AM

This Development should be sympathetic to the National Register Historic District of the Village of Concord which state: Pavement widths should be continued into any proposed development. The widening of Second Street should be as limited as possible. Narrow streets are a key part of the setting of the Historic Neighbor. Please see the attached document with our guidelines. While this property is not in the historic overlay, It is at the entrance of the Historic District and should be compatible with guidelines when it is possible. There is no usefulness in continuing the widening of second street past the proposed entrance and, therefore it should be avoided.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105033244.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 4:47 AM

Melina
37914

11-J-24-DP
Melina (37914), November 5, 2024 at 4:47 AM

I disagree with this development.

7-SE-24-C

John
37931

7-SE-24-C
John (37931), July 1, 2024 at 4:58 PM

To build anything on this poor road will be insane. Traffic behavior well exceeds the 35 mph speed zone.....cars and trucks are lined up at least a half mile from the RR tunnel in the afternoon time slot There have been multiple fatal accidents in the 14 years I have lived here. To enter or leave the intersection of Hodge Rd. is almost impossible in the early and evening drive time hours. To build an entrance for this subdivision on this property where there is already an existing home having the front next to the main road is the most ridiculous idea I have ever witnessed. Please for the sake of taxpayers and residents of this area that call it home, please deny this application and tell the developers to take their money elsewhere !

July 1, 2024
at 4:58 PM

November 5, 2024
at 8:14 AM

William
37902

11-B-24-UR
William (37902), November 5, 2024 at 8:14 AM

See attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105081420.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 8:26 AM

Jon
37934

11-B-24-UR
Jon (37934), November 5, 2024 at 8:26 AM

Please see the attached comments that show: While the convenience store is now scaled down to 4,975 sq. ft. the fueling area will be an additional 4,560 sq. ft. putting this establishment at 9,535 sq. ft. This is not in harmony with 5.38.04.B. No individual building or commercial establishment shall have a floor area exceeding five thousand (5,000) square feet.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105082642.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 9:28 AM

Charles
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Charles (37918), November 5, 2024 at 9:28 AM

I would oppose this development for numerous reasons, but the biggest is that the area simply lacks the infrastructure required. There is already excessive traffic on Tazewell Pike, and it makes it hard for current residents to get in and out of the existing neighborhoods safely. There are also numerous issues with sinkholes in the area and springs, causing hazardous conditions-the Cottages on Tazewell community had a large sinkhole form a few years after being built that required several trucks of concrete to be poured into the ground to stabilize the area. There is already a flooding issue in the area during rains and snow, and this would be worsened by a new property removing all the root systems that absorb the runoff. All in all, the area simply does not have the means to support an additional community without adding additional lanes to Tazewell Pike and adding drainage runoffs.

November 5, 2024
at 3:40 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:40 PM

I have enclosed several photos taken in 2005 and 2013 from our back porch and in the 5027 Tazewell Pike Property showing the back of our house and Bradford Condos Between my property and 4509 Simona Rd is 1 of 2 main drainage ditches for the runoff of Beverly Acres Subdivision. The rainwater starts at Mountain Crest (Black Oak Ridge-South side) down Ridgemont to Santa Monica to Malibu to a underground culvert on Angeles to the South side of Simona border my property to 5027 Tazewell Pike creates a small pond backing into my yard and 4505 Simona several times a year with extreme rain. In addition, runoff from Gouffon,Stokely and Bellerive in Mont Richer Subdivisions. All of these runoffs contribute to the flooding of Tazewell Pike at Fountain Gate Road In addition, Shannondale School is at or close to capacity creating a backup of traffic on Shannondale Rd and Tazewell Pike.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105154040.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 3:42 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:42 PM

more photos
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105154252.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 3:44 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:44 PM

more photos
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105154415.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 3:45 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:45 PM

more photos
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105154515.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 3:46 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:46 PM

more photos
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105154614.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 3:47 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:47 PM

more photos
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105154713.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 3:48 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:48 PM

more photos
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105154810.pdf

November 5, 2024
at 3:52 PM

Richard
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Richard (37918), November 5, 2024 at 3:52 PM

more photos. I also have a video on my phone that i could not send via email

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241105155211.pdf

November 6, 2024
at 2:52 PM

Mona
37772

11-B-24-UR
Mona (37772), November 6, 2024 at 2:52 PM

Comments are attached in pdf format
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241106145252.pdf

November 6, 2024
at 7:01 PM

Lindsay
28786

11-B-24-UR
Lindsay (28786), November 6, 2024 at 7:01 PM

I am writing regarding the Concord Masonic Cemetery and the EZ STOP development.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241106190122.pdf

November 6, 2024
at 7:27 PM

Mona
37772

11-B-24-UR
Mona (37772), November 6, 2024 at 7:27 PM

For those who are not familiar with the layout of the Old Concord area, the attached map is illustrative of the various routes of traffic from proposed EZ Stop Development through Old Concord if exit onto Second Drive from development is allowed. One can see the effect of increased traffic throughout this residential area.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241106192758.pdf

November 6, 2024
at 9:09 PM

Jonathan
37934

11-B-24-UR
Jonathan (37934), November 6, 2024 at 9:09 PM

The site plan has proposed signs that would violate CN zoning code. Please review the attached document.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241106210903.pdf

November 6, 2024
at 9:29 PM

Abby
37934

11-B-24-UR
Abby (37934), November 6, 2024 at 9:29 PM

See PDF
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241106212914.pdf

November 6, 2024
at 9:34 PM

Barbara
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Barbara (37918), November 6, 2024 at 9:34 PM

In addition to the topographical issues mentioned above, the concerns about the current traffic flow, even without any additional development in this area, should be taken very seriously. Due to the multiple new developments that are further north in the county, traffic on Tazewell Pike has become dangerously heavy especially during morning and evening rush. Currently, several large developments exist in immediate proximity to the one being proposed in this rezoning request. It is a very common occurrence for us to sit at the entrance of Bradford Place condominiums, which is just below the proposed site, while streams of 20 - 30 cars at a time fly by, bumper to bumper, at 50 - 55 mph. When you can finally glimpse a small break in traffic, you literally take your life in your hands pulling on to this two lane road which has no turn lane and no shoulders. Seriously… there should at least be an official, unbiased, traffic study done before this rezoning is even considered.

November 6, 2024
at 9:38 PM

Abby
37934

11-B-24-UR
Abby (37934), November 6, 2024 at 9:38 PM

At the last Planning Commission meeting it was brought up about an archaeological survey that should be performed. I think it is important that this survey be done by a third party group NOT the developer (Tommy Hunt/EZ Stop). This will allow for a thorough survey of the grounds to make sure graves are not disturbed.

September 9, 2024
at 10:29 PM

Mark
37920

8-A-24-DP
Mark (37920), September 9, 2024 at 10:29 PM

I have notice several developers attempting to gain approval for developing along Gov. John Sevier Highway. This Scenic Highway should be considered, as an established area, where access and egress should be limited. Look at the numbers of applications being considered. There are about five parcels being considered for low and medium density units per acre currently. I want to keep the established low density, single family dwelling, character in this area. That being said, I am not for passing low density zoning just to have the developer request more DU/AC or use zoning features to transfer property for other purposes. Please do not pass more than 2 units per acre for this property to stay in character with the neighborhood.

11-A-24-SU

Paul
37917

11-A-24-SU
Paul (37917), November 7, 2024 at 3:12 AM

Would like to discuss extending the easement or road to rear lot located at 2825 Mineral Springs Ave going to top of ridge. Would like ability to extend easement and road to access 2825 Mineral Springs Ave rear lot for future single family residence. Moreover, would the proposed builder allow or KUB allow shared public utilities to surrounding properties that tie into proposed work. 2825 Mineral Springs Ave 37917 would like to request proposed new zoning to be extended to rear lot of 2825 Mineral Springs Ave owner for future personal single family home.

November 7, 2024
at 3:12 AM

November 7, 2024
at 5:28 AM

Mark
37934

11-B-24-UR
Mark (37934), November 7, 2024 at 5:28 AM

The proposal to exit a high volume establishment onto a small road that leads through a quiet historic neighborhood is insane. No sign is going to prevent this as drivers and GPS will see the advantage in swerving through the small roads leading to Canton Hollow thereby avoiding the increasing traffic congestion in Farragut. I urge the Commission Members to drive these narrow roads through not only Old Concord but also through other communities leading to Canton Hollow. You will only need to do this once to understand. If the Commission is convinced that the community needs another high volume gas station/fast food store then there is ample commercial land to create an exit back onto the existing high volume Concord Road that at least was designed for this purpose! I suppose an exit back onto Concord might use up more commercial land but that is a price that should be paid to maintain the safety of our communities.

September 10, 2024
at 10:07 AM

Steve
37920

8-A-24-DP
Steve (37920), September 10, 2024 at 10:07 AM

While I understand that development is going to move forward I believe that there is some better options for all who live in the area. Currently the design is to have the only entrance and exit to the development on Crenshaw close to the intersection of Maryville Pike, with little work to address traffic. We (individuals in general) all tend to take the shortest distance between our destination points. For work and most consumer needs (groceries, dinning, hardware etc.) for this area you need to travel east towards Chapman Highway. The current design of Crenshaw and topography of the road and land will not be able to accommodate an increase of traffic from this development as planned. It would be better for ingress and egress to the development if the entrance, exit is on Gov. John Sevier or on Maryville Pike at Old Maryville Pike. Crenshaw is a small narrow road that struggles with current traffic during "rush hours" and vehicles larger than mid size passenger cars. Society now had a lot more home delivery I.E. amazon vehicles that makes it nearly impossible to pass on this road if one vehicle does not come to a stop or merge into someone's yard or driveway disrupting flow or damaging yards. Gov. John Sevier is planned to be widened in the near future to four lanes. This would allow a better design for ingress and egress to the planned development, and allow the surrounding area less burdened with a negative impact.

November 7, 2024
at 3:15 PM

Tricia
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Tricia (37918), November 7, 2024 at 3:15 PM

Please see the attached PDF for my comments.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241107151531.pdf

November 7, 2024
at 4:33 PM

Joel
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Joel (37918), November 7, 2024 at 4:33 PM

Please refer to attached PDF
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241107163350.pdf

November 7, 2024
at 5:02 PM

Joe
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Joe (37918), November 7, 2024 at 5:02 PM

This property has several problems with development. First, traffic. If allowed at the density requested 110 units could be built. This would cause increasing problems with accidents along this stretch of road. Secondly, and most importantly, is the water runoff problem. Two creeks, one of which appears to be spring fed, are on the property. During heavy and more frequent rainstorms that property has real runoff problems. This level of development would increase the water flowing into the Bradford Place property and cause problems with our culverts and would then flow to the Fountain Gate area and cause problems there.

November 7, 2024
at 7:01 PM

Charles and Dorothy
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Charles and Dorothy (37918), November 7, 2024 at 7:01 PM

We are concerned about the spring fed Blue Water that comes from this property and passes through our property. we know that there are restrictions regarding the need to preserve the status of this water. We know that after heavy rains the water from the subdivision above us on the North side floods the field behind us on the property in question and have concerns about any building that might be planned for that area. We have noted standing water up to and including the property line for Bradford Place homeowners.

November 7, 2024
at 7:34 PM

John
37918

11-I-24-RZ
John (37918), November 7, 2024 at 7:34 PM

Issues concerning traffic.And Flooding on adjoining property

November 7, 2024
at 9:08 PM

Renee
37871

11-J-24-DP
Renee (37871), November 7, 2024 at 9:08 PM

STOP THIS INSANITY!

November 8, 2024
at 9:04 AM

Debby & Don
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Debby & Don (37918), November 8, 2024 at 9:04 AM

The additional housing proposed for the property between Bradford Place and Mont Richer will certainly cause flooding problems for Bradford Place. The additional water runoff will affect the two creeks which run through Bradford Place causing flooding and erosion of the hillside adjoining said property. With Bradford Place, the Cottages on Tazewell , Mont Richer and a possible new housing development all side by side the traffic on Tazewell Pike, which is a two-lane roadway would be congested and more dangerous than ever to travel on. I certainly hope these two areas of concern are presented to the Planning Commission during the public hearing.

November 8, 2024
at 12:25 PM

REBECCA
37918

11-I-24-RZ
REBECCA (37918), November 8, 2024 at 12:25 PM

I am a resident of Bradford Place and I am concerned about the proposed zoning change for the property located at 5027 Tazewell Pike. If this property is developed to proposed capacity there would be an increased flooding events as any runoff will feed both creeks that come onto Bradford Place. Flooding is already an issue on Tazewell Pike at the Fountain Gate Entrance where the two creeks from Bradford converge with a third creek at Fountain Gate. Also, the existing property only has 50 feet of right of way. Tazewell Pike is already overburdened with traffic as a result of growth in the area. As a result there have been more serious accidents in the area. Thank you for concerning my concerns.

November 8, 2024
at 12:49 PM

Deborah
e way

11-I-24-RZ
Deborah (e way), November 8, 2024 at 12:49 PM

I am a homeowner in bradford place my concern is that flooding is a grave issue here. Also when learning about sinkholes on this property, that is also a great concern that they are not taking care of properly for the future and also my concern is that this land will be stripped of all vegetation and we have very large beautiful trees on this property that borders bradford place should all these trees be cut down then there will be no route system to prevent further flooding . thank you

November 8, 2024
at 1:16 PM

Sarah
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Sarah (37918), November 8, 2024 at 1:16 PM

See pdf attachment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241108131632.pdf

November 8, 2024
at 2:26 PM

MAN (Susanna)
37918

11-I-24-RZ
MAN (Susanna) (37918), November 8, 2024 at 2:26 PM

Refer to attachment
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241108142615.pdf

November 8, 2024
at 10:11 PM

Jennifer
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Jennifer (37918), November 8, 2024 at 10:11 PM

I have lived in Bradford Place since 2001. This is a peaceful and beautiful area to live in but unfortunately, with apartment complex across from us, and the increase in developments all around, the traffic is dangerous and frankly almost unbearable. As it is now, I risk my life trying to pull out from the Bradford Place entrance. The entrance to the proposed development behind Bradford is pretty much at a blind curve at a hill. Adding multiple dwellings at that location is essentially sealing the deal on a road death trap. This development will also cause flooding issues for Bradford Place as it will feed the two creeks that run through our property and behind many condos. This is a well known flooding area. There are many times that the entrance at Fountaingate is not passable due to flooding. We are responsible for the roads in Bradford Place and all of us at the top of the hill must travel down and over a culvert that is at great risk of collapse with likely additional strain caused by the development. If this were to happen, we would be trapped with no way out and the expense to repair, if it was possible, would be great. This development puts Bradford Place at risk of flooding and infrastructure failure. I strongly oppose this. I respectfully ask you to listen to these real concerns because it is risk to life and personal property and could make our neighborhood virtually unlivable because of flooding.

November 8, 2024
at 10:32 PM

Dwain and Martha
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Dwain and Martha (37918), November 8, 2024 at 10:32 PM

Our 1st concern is related to water runoff. We stand a very good chance of having increased flooding events since any runoff will feed both creeks that come onto Bradford. This has the potential of damaging homes and roads, damaging two culverts under the roads, and accelerating erosion of a hill for some our homeowners. Our road is private, and repairs would be at our expense. The property in question has a sink hole that is a result of runoff from Beverly Acres Subdivision. A spring is on the property which would require protections. The lower half of the property is prone to flooding, and there is a strong possibility of caves or more sinkholes on the property. Flooding is already an issue on Tazewell Pike at the Fountain Gate entrance where the 2 creeks from Bradford converge with a 3rd creek. Our 2nd concern is related to road capacity - traffic. Tazewell pike is already overburdened with traffic as a result of growth in the area and is experiencing more serious accidents. The existing property only has a 50 ft. right-of-way. The entrance to the proposed development is at an area already prone to serious accidents at Tazewell Pike and the entrance to Mont Richer. There has been one death in the last year at this site.

November 9, 2024
at 7:46 AM

Lawrence
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Lawrence (37918), November 9, 2024 at 7:46 AM

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241109074609.pdf

November 9, 2024
at 10:21 AM

John
37924

11-J-24-DP
John (37924), November 9, 2024 at 10:21 AM

This Subdivision will be straight across the street from my house the community does not need or want this our schools and roads can not handle this please do not vote for this development.

November 9, 2024
at 5:13 PM

Kathryn
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Kathryn (37918), November 9, 2024 at 5:13 PM

See Attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241109171332.pdf

November 10, 2024
at 3:52 PM

Kevin
37918

11-B-24-UR
Kevin (37918), November 10, 2024 at 3:52 PM

What is the need for the wrap-around drive lanes on the sides and rear of the proposed building? This adds additional impervious surface, grading, etc. Other similar convenience stores have been built without needing roads all the way around them - i.e. the Weigels on Washington Pike.

Introduction of this space for automobiles invites vehicular traffic to the rear section of the property, along with the noise and exhaust that this traffic brings. Elimination of the two drive-lanes would reduce impervious surface (and run-off and required detention ponds), and eliminate a potential source of nuisance noise and light trespass to neighbors.

11-SG-24-C

John
37924

11-SG-24-C
John (37924), November 10, 2024 at 11:49 PM

This property is across the street from my house it is hard to believe that another big subdivision is being built in this area when there is plenty of houses that this community does won't or need in this area. please do not allow this development to be passed

November 10, 2024
at 11:49 PM

November 11, 2024
at 10:19 AM

TA
37918

11-I-24-RZ
TA (37918), November 11, 2024 at 10:19 AM

see attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241111101933.pdf

November 11, 2024
at 12:12 PM

Kathryn
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Kathryn (37918), November 11, 2024 at 12:12 PM

Please see attached comments and pictures
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241111121225.pdf

November 11, 2024
at 4:42 PM

Jane
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Jane (37918), November 11, 2024 at 4:42 PM

I have two major concerns for which I am submitting separate comments due to space limitation. This concern #1 is for worsening of serious rush hour traffic issues in this area of Tazewell Pike. There are major traffic safety issues for approximately a mile either side of this proposed development. I drive in this area both morning and afternoon providing transportation for my school-aged grandchildren. Visibility is already very poor due to the curve in Tazewell Pike near the entrance to Mount Richer and change in elevation; additional traffic at 5027 Tazewell Pike will not only add to an overburdened route but will markedly increase the hazard to drivers attempting to turn out of Bradford and Fountaingate, as well as those attempting to turn across traffic from the very large apartment development directly across from 5027 Tazewell Pike (on the south side of Tazewell Pike). I am requesting that additional multi-unit development not be approved for this area. Thank you, in advance, for your consideration.

November 11, 2024
at 4:46 PM

Jane
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Jane (37918), November 11, 2024 at 4:46 PM

I have two major concerns for which I am submitting separate comments due to space limitation. This concern #2 is for worsening of water run-off and land shifting problems that already exist. I live next door in Bradford Place, a community that has already had to expend significant funds over the last 3 years to address land shifting, felt largely related to water run-off; my home has already suffered necessary alterations to my patio retaining wall, leading to unavoidable alterations in appearance that will affect the resale value of my home. Significant changes to nearby land and water run-off that would be necessary for a multi-unit development place us at even higher risk for worsening safety issues, as well as other value-altering issues. I am requesting that additional multi-unit development not be approved for this area. Thank you, in advance, for your consideration.

November 11, 2024
at 6:13 PM

Florence
37934

11-B-24-UR
Florence (37934), November 11, 2024 at 6:13 PM

We do not want this big gas station in our neighborhood. Is this a case of big money that has no consideration of the people all over again? Do we want to call this greed? This is obvious that NO ONE is our neighborhood is in favor of such a project! Why don't you build your gas station close to Kroger in Farragut? There is a lot of land and it looks like it is the perfect place for such a business. They are building a whole city over there. This gas station will increase noise and traffic pollution. We have kids and pets roaming free in our streets because it is that peaceful. Kids ride their bikes also at dusk. People like to walk our streets for exercice and walk their dogs. I don't want to imagine an deadly accident over a greasy burger! Is it worth the security of our children? Why don't we approve a small business that will represent the fabric of our community instead? I urge you to stop this project...If not possible, let's make 2nd street only an exist into Concord road.

November 11, 2024
at 8:36 PM

Susan
37924

11-J-24-DP
Susan (37924), November 11, 2024 at 8:36 PM

We do not need another subdivisio. Our roads, schools, infrastructure cant handle it. John sevier & Asheville hwy back up both directions morning and evenings..

November 11, 2024
at 8:59 PM

Arnold
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Arnold (37918), November 11, 2024 at 8:59 PM

Please see attached Objection to Rezoning Request.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20241111205931.pdf

November 12, 2024
at 7:55 AM

Amber
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Amber (37918), November 12, 2024 at 7:55 AM

As a homeowner you lives by and uses tazewell pike daily. We are already landlocked. The roads can not accommodate the growth and with adding more access roads, more homes should NOT be going in. The amount of subdivisions builders are attempting to put in without the city insisting on focusing on infrastructure first is immoral and unjust. We are literally being trapped with no exit point that flows in cases of emergencies. Over the last 3 years, the commute out of the area has seen significant growth due to the increase of homes/cars and only continues to worsen. Roads before more homes!!!

10-SB-24-C

Victoria
37920

10-SB-24-C
Victoria (37920), November 12, 2024 at 9:17 AM

Please understand our concern for contamination of this property from the storage of dynamite. I also think that making future residents pay for infrastructure is a bad idea. Please do not approve the petition of D.R. Horton for a special Residential District. https://www.wate.com/investigations/neighbors-fight-proposed-subdivision-at-old-dynamite-storage-site-in-south-knox-county/

November 12, 2024
at 9:17 AM

November 12, 2024
at 9:23 AM

susan
37924

11-J-24-DP
susan (37924), November 12, 2024 at 9:23 AM

This development of 245 housing units and the nearby planned 114 town house development on Asheville Highway will create over 350 of housing units within a quarter of a mile of one another. These developments will destroy the rural and largely agricultural character of this community. These developments will place an undue burden on the infrastrucure and the people that live here.

November 12, 2024
at 1:49 PM

Hali
37871

11-J-24-DP
Hali (37871), November 12, 2024 at 1:49 PM

Asheville Highway does not need anymore traffic. There’s too much going on in the area as is, far too many people, far too many houses. I absolutely oppose another development in my area.

9-G-24-SU

Rana
37920

9-G-24-SU
Rana (37920), September 13, 2024 at 12:09 PM

As a homeowner that lives very close to Calvary Chapel, I and other neighbors have been negatively impacted by the increased traffic we have seen as the church has expanded. The church is located just off of a busy highway ramp on an already congested road in a residential area. Particularly on Sundays and Wednesday evenings when church lets out, there is a pronounced increase in traffic to the point that I struggle to find an opening to pull out of my driveway (which is within sight of the church property) onto john Sevier Hwy. As a resident and homeowner that neighbors the church, I am opposed to further expansion of this property unless the city manages increased negative traffic impacts with reasonable mitigations. Thank you.

September 13, 2024
at 12:09 PM

11-T-24-RZ

Kevin
37918

11-T-24-RZ
Kevin (37918), November 12, 2024 at 5:20 PM

KCPA would support a density of up to 1 du/ac for this, which aligns with the recommendation for the parcel to the east (10-I-24-RZ, agenda item 38). The subject property is in a rural area of East Knox County with sparse residential development, steep, forested slopes and winding street access.

November 12, 2024
at 5:20 PM

September 15, 2024
at 4:32 PM

Chad
37920

9-A-24-SU
Chad (37920), September 15, 2024 at 4:32 PM

This would be a great for the locals, an it'll help folks work an a lot more!

November 12, 2024
at 5:34 PM

Kevin
37918

11-I-24-RZ
Kevin (37918), November 12, 2024 at 5:34 PM

This parcel is so problematic, with water, flooding, and traffic issues, that Planning Commission should insist on a Development Plan to be submitted with this. The applicant wants to develop this problematic parcel, they need to bring the whole plan to the rezoning request.