July 8, 2021
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

390 Comments for
X Date
Case Number
Name
Comment
Attachment
On Behalf Of
Date
3-SB-21-C
Justin
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), February 12, 2021 at 1:37 PM
482 lots is WAY too many lots for that area. There is nothing that large in our entire community. This would create non stop traffic in my front yard around the clock.
February 12, 2021
at 1:37 PM
3-SB-21-C
Courtney
37806
3-SB-21-C
Courtney (37806), February 18, 2021 at 12:05 PM
Hello my name is Courtney Key and I live in Mascot, Tennessee. Originally from the Powell area which is closer to the city of Knoxville I could not wait to move out here and experience what living in the country was like. I know that I don’t live in straw plains but I am still apart of this community and this particular area wanting to build a mega subdivision is very close to my home. Since I live so close I travel this area quite often. My husband and I love our community because of the slower paced, quiet and rural lifestyle. You can’t experience these things living closer to Knoxville which is why we moved out here. I fear for the day this area becomes too built up and brings with it a ton of traffic killing our way of life out here. Bringing in all this new traffic would really take away from the peaceful, quiet slow paced lifestyle that we all know and love out here. Not only that but the massive size of this project takes away from the beautiful land. I hope you will consider how the massive size of this project would affect the life of this community and the reason everyone loves living out here. Lastly please consider making this a smaller project, thank you.
February 18, 2021
at 12:05 PM
3-SB-21-C
Evangelynn
37924
3-SB-21-C
Evangelynn (37924), February 18, 2021 at 3:40 PM
I am very concerned about this proposed development, particularly the potential impacts to the neighborhood streets and traffic and the area utility services (water and sewer). I believe the density of this planned development is inappropriate for the surrounding area, and the fact that the entry points are both on Ruggles Ferry is a huge drawback. Traffic on this road is already a concern and this will worsen that situation. Water and sewer services are sometimes a problem in this area and I am concerned this many lots will overburden the system. Finally, I don't want to see my property values decrease due to the issues created by this subdivision. This is very unfair to the other property owners in the neighborhood.
February 18, 2021
at 3:40 PM
3-SB-21-C
Sarah
37871
3-SB-21-C
Sarah (37871), February 19, 2021 at 9:51 AM
The massive size of this subdivision is absolutely ridiculous for this area. Ruggles Ferry Road cannot support this much daily traffic. Most people have lived on this road their whole lives and have seen the traffic increase in the past few years and no one living on this road wants to see this increase dramatically. This is a rural area and while growth is welcomed, 482 houses is not needed/wanted for this community. Please consider downsizing the number of homes. You can profit just as much from nicer homes on larger lots.
February 19, 2021
at 9:51 AM
3-SB-21-C
Carl
37924
3-SB-21-C
Carl (37924), February 19, 2021 at 10:16 AM
Attached is my letter opposing concept plan 3-SB-21-C. Thank you.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210219101600.pdf
February 19, 2021
at 10:16 AM
3-SB-21-C
Becca
37871
3-SB-21-C
Becca (37871), February 22, 2021 at 10:30 AM
My house is directly across from the entrance to this MEGA-subdivision. This would create non-stop traffic on Ruggles Ferry and the connecting roads can not handle this traffic. The concept of this many houses does not fit with the current setting of this area.
February 22, 2021
at 10:30 AM
3-SB-21-C
David
37924
3-SB-21-C
David (37924), February 22, 2021 at 12:45 PM
I oppose this high intensity project due to the negative environmental impact it will have on the Holston River Basin area of the proposed site. Has the Environmental Impact Study been completed?
February 22, 2021
at 12:45 PM
3-SB-21-C
Derek
37924
3-SB-21-C
Derek (37924), February 22, 2021 at 5:43 PM
Please see my attached letter regarding the above noted planned development. Thank you for your service and for your consideration of our concerns.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210222174334.pdf
February 22, 2021
at 5:43 PM
3-SB-21-C
Kevin
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kevin (37871), February 22, 2021 at 9:09 PM
I own and live on 12.5 acres adjoining this proposed dense subdivision. While I am not opposed to a subdivision that fits into the surrounding area, I am opposed to a subdivision that has almost 3 homes per acre. Most of the homes in this area are on 2 acres or more. One of the main reasons we moved from West Knoxville to this location 20 years ago is because it is more rural and has a country feel. A subdivision with this density would definitely take away from the attractiveness of this area. This proposed subdivision would not only dramatically increase traffic on Ruggles Ferry Road but would also decrease property values in the area.
February 22, 2021
at 9:09 PM
3-SB-21-C
Peggy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), February 25, 2021 at 7:57 AM
My family opposes this development. We moved here because of the rural nature of this community. North Ruggles Ferry Pike can not accommodate traffic from a subdivision of this magnitude. Please DO NOT approve this!
February 25, 2021
at 7:57 AM
3-SB-21-C
Kathy and Kraig
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kathy and Kraig (37871), February 27, 2021 at 8:55 AM
Please do not approve this development! As a family we live in East Knox County because of the quiet rural environment and the sense of belonging to a community that embraces nature, community and supports our farmers. We still have bald eagles flying in the skies and Otters, Beavers and Muskrates swimming in the Holsten River. The proposed development will have a significant impact on our environment, especially the Holsten River habitat. This development does not match the surrounding area, nor the intent of the community to maintain its rural heritage.

The size of this development will have a significant impact on the infrastructure in our community. The impact on the feeder roads especially Burris Road, Pleasant Hill and Ruggles Ferry will create a level of traffic that will have dangerous results and a negative impact on noise levels, congestion and overall safety on our small rural roads.

Development is inevitable, however we ask that the County Commission represent the residence who live here presently and that you consideration the uniqueness of each part of our County and approve developments that enhance the East County community, not destroy it's very essence of rural living.
February 27, 2021
at 8:55 AM
3-SB-21-C
Bobby and Abby
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bobby and Abby (37871), March 1, 2021 at 4:15 PM
I do not agree with this new development as I am very concerned about the increase in traffic due to having small children and disruption of country side view.
March 1, 2021
at 4:15 PM
3-SB-21-C
Andrea
37871
3-SB-21-C
Andrea (37871), March 1, 2021 at 10:25 PM
I added my comments as a PDF. This development really needs to be evaluated to the impact of the community around it.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210301222522.pdf
March 1, 2021
at 10:25 PM
3-SB-21-C
GREG
37924
3-SB-21-C
GREG (37924), March 2, 2021 at 8:13 AM
I have property on Burris Road and Graves Road. I travel Ruggles Ferry back and forth with farm equipment. The traffic is already bad now at times and there has been numerous times of almost an accident due to high speed vehicles. We certainly DO NOT NEED ALL the traffic that this would bring it pose many problems. The Carter schools are crowded now , they would have trouble handling all the many children that this would be having. I AM OPPOSED TO THIS BEING PUT IN>
March 2, 2021
at 8:13 AM
3-SB-21-C
Constance
37924
3-SB-21-C
Constance (37924), March 2, 2021 at 10:01 AM
I disagree with the plan of building 400 new homes in an area that will need a lot of money to accommodate an increased number of people, traffic, and sewage. Unless their are plans comparable of increased road space on Ruffles Ferry Road, water and sewage accommodation and traffic needs it will would be Unadvisable to do so. There are many lower income families that live in this area that own property and houses. Increased taxes could make it impossible to keep their property and homes. Thank you for your time concerning this matter.
March 2, 2021
at 10:01 AM
3-SB-21-C
Kenzie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kenzie (37871), March 3, 2021 at 10:55 AM
see attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210303105556.pdf
March 3, 2021
at 10:55 AM
3-SB-21-C
Greg
37871
3-SB-21-C
Greg (37871), March 3, 2021 at 2:49 PM
Not a fan of this project, I live nearby- I already can not get some services like quality home internet (Bellsouth DSL) , the poor signal i get will now be divided between 482 other households which will cause the signal to be much worse per Bellsouth. Traffic on Ruggles Ferry which is a rural road will not be safe. Even worse are the connecting roads to get to Asheville Hwy such as Cash Rd, Pleasant Hill, and Wooddale Rd which are not even two lane roads and could not safely support this amount of traffic.
March 3, 2021
at 2:49 PM
3-SB-21-C
Josh & Melissa
37924
3-SB-21-C
Josh & Melissa (37924), March 4, 2021 at 8:11 AM
Hello I am a home owner on Ruggles Ferry Pike and would like to voice my opposition to this new neighborhood. I agree with the concerns that I am sure you have heard about traffic on our small roads. While I oppose I understand growth is inevitable. My ask is that the lot size be a mandatory ½ acre (would love to have 1 acre lots!) and also would ask that since this will be a burden on the existing members of the community that the builders give us something we can all enjoy such as a community boat launch on the river and a playground/picnic area for residents to enjoy. Sidewalks throughout the neighborhood would be great as well to ensure the residents new and existing have a safe place to walk considering the additional traffic that will be added. Thank you in advance for your consideration and help with ensuring the betterment of the community.
March 4, 2021
at 8:11 AM
3-SB-21-C
Ritchie
37902
3-SB-21-C
Ritchie (37902), March 4, 2021 at 11:04 AM
I could not agree more with your email. While 1 acre lots would certainly be wonderful, the 1/2 acre size is still well below the density that would be allowed in that zone, so anything close to that would be a great compromise. I also agree with the amenities you have suggested, as this is a very nice existing neighborhood - arguably the highest end neighborhood in the entire 8th District.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210304110426.pdf
March 4, 2021
at 11:04 AM
3-SB-21-C
JUSTIN
37871
3-SB-21-C
JUSTIN (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:33 PM
See attached pdf
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210304153340.pdf
March 4, 2021
at 3:33 PM
3-SB-21-C
Brad
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:37 PM
This project will be terrible for the community and will turn people off to our area. It does not fit what the people of Carter want and needs to be dropped.
March 4, 2021
at 3:37 PM
3-SB-21-C
April
37871
3-SB-21-C
April (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:46 PM
The development of 482 lots on Ruggles Ferry Pike is not only going to be an eyesore for the area, but a logistical nightmare for the community. Traffic is already a problem early in the morning and later in the afternoons as people commute to school and work, and adding an additional 482 families is only going to make the experience worse. Additionally, Carter schools do not have the capacity to handle even half that amount of potential enrollees, and since Carter Elementary was recently renovated I can’t imagine it would be renovated once more to accommodate even more students any time soon. The homes currently on and around Ruggles Ferry are generally large, expensive family homes, and to add almost 500 lower-end homes will not only add the problems mentioned above, but will greatly impact the property value of any homes in this area. This is a project no one in the Carter community supports aside from those who are receiving the financial gain from it. It must be stopped to preserve our community.
March 4, 2021
at 3:46 PM
3-SB-21-C
Sherry
37871
3-SB-21-C
Sherry (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:55 PM
This plan has way too many houses. The roads can not handle this much traffic. Secondary roads are very narrow. I am very concerned about this development.
March 4, 2021
at 3:55 PM
3-SB-21-C
Johnnie
37806
3-SB-21-C
Johnnie (37806), March 4, 2021 at 4:01 PM
482 new houses on Ruggles Ferry Rd would put way to much traffic on a already busy road. People built new houses in this community because of its scenic beauty and this housing development would destroy it. Please VOTE no on this request.
March 4, 2021
at 4:01 PM
3-SB-21-C
Kylie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kylie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:05 PM
I oppose the development of this high density development. Please consider a development plan that aligns to the current standards of the surrounding neighborhood.
March 4, 2021
at 4:05 PM
3-SB-21-C
Whitney
37924
3-SB-21-C
Whitney (37924), March 4, 2021 at 4:06 PM
Please take the time on a lovely Sunday afternoon to walk, bike or drive around our relaxed, east Knox County neighborhood and enjoy our Holston River views towards House Mountain.

Please vote to reduce the houses to 1 per acre (or ideally 1 per 2 acres lol).

We would welcome 100 new neighbors but 482 is insane.

We do not want to become Turkey Creek East.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210304160627.pdf
March 4, 2021
at 4:06 PM
3-SB-21-C
Donna
s Fer
3-SB-21-C
Donna (s Fer), March 4, 2021 at 4:16 PM
I am extremely opposed to this proposed development. With 482 homes it will add close to 1,000 cars to an already well traveled 2 lane Ruggles Ferry Pike. I can only go across the road to my mailbox at certain times due to the traffic already here. We moved here from Nashville and chose the area due to the rural atmosphere with sparse development. This may be the most densely populated development in Knox County which I feel is unacceptable for this area. Thank you
March 4, 2021
at 4:16 PM
3-SB-21-C
Brandi
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brandi (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:22 PM
Ruggles Ferry cannot handle the traffic, the schools cannot handle that many more students. The beauty in Straw Plains is all the open land. Why does it have to be almost 500 homes stacked on top of each other, instead space them out and have and better quality built home especially in the area.
March 4, 2021
at 4:22 PM
3-SB-21-C
Travis
37871
3-SB-21-C
Travis (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:23 PM
I oppose the development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. This would be one of the largest and most dense developments in all of Knox County. Lessen the density.
March 4, 2021
at 4:23 PM
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 5:36 PM
Please don’t allow this huge development to happen! There would be tremendous traffic congestion on our two lane rural road. I have lived on Graves Road for 50 of my 57 years and our community does not want such a huge development! How would the Carter schools even accommodate all of the potential children? All of the roads that feed into Asheville Highway are extremely narrow, so how would traffic be for those roads? Please, please let our community stay a small rural community!
March 4, 2021
at 5:36 PM
3-SB-21-C
Jessie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jessie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:09 PM
I am writing for concern and opposing the large development in our rural area. You can drive down Ruggles Ferry almost any sunny day and see people walking, running, walking their dogs and riding bikes. Not only does a development this size and number of houses not match the rural area, but it is dangerous to our community with the increase of traffic for our pedestrians. A development with reasonable and respectful homes is considerable. The one in question is greedy and not appropriate for the area.
March 4, 2021
at 6:09 PM
3-SB-21-C
Caroline
37871
3-SB-21-C
Caroline (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:36 PM
I am opposed to the size and density of this development being nearly 3 homes per acre. I am concerned about the infrastructure needed to support a development of this size, as well as the impact that it will have on the school system, roads, environment, etc. I urge you to reconsider this development, or at the very least, to dramatically reduce the amount of homes reflected in the current plan.
March 4, 2021
at 6:36 PM
3-SB-21-C
Steve
37709
3-SB-21-C
Steve (37709), March 4, 2021 at 6:51 PM
The number of vehicles this high density subdivision will bring to the immediate and surrounding areas is totally unacceptable. The infrastructure simply cannot handle it and widening of the current roads will have a bad effect on property values. In addition, the noise and light pollution this subdivision will bring will destroy the quietness of the area. Please vote against this construction of this subdivision.
March 4, 2021
at 6:51 PM
3-SB-21-C
Anne
37871
3-SB-21-C
Anne (37871), March 4, 2021 at 7:08 PM
I have lived in this community for over 50 years. I have seen a lot of changes, some good, some not so good. While I am open to the concept of a subdivision being built in our area I am strongly opposed to the density of this proposal. I would like to see it reduced to a maximum of 1 house per acre or preferably 2 acres. We are a rural farming community. My house is 1.5 miles from the end of my driveway to the main entrance of the proposed subdivision. In this 1.5 miles there are 6 operating farms (and 2 on the other side of the entrance) that have slow moving farm equipment traveling all hours of the day and night. With the added growth in the last few years Ruggles Ferry has become a Nascar speedway. It has no shoulders or sidewalks and in some places steep drop offs that could cause serious injury if your wheel slipped off the edge of the road. It will be a disaster going to happen when an additional 800 to 1000 cars are added. Ruggles Ferry and the smaller side roads that carry traffic to Asheville Highway cannot handle this additional load.

This is a rural farming community and we would like for it to retain that atmosphere. We do not want it to become a West Knoxville. That is why we live HERE and not THERE.
March 4, 2021
at 7:08 PM
3-SB-21-C
Ashley
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ashley (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM
This is going to negatively affect my community. The traffic, the beauty of the farm land will be destroyed by this. That is the main reason we live here. Our community will be destroyed. If this is something that goes through, The plan needs to be rethought. Take a look at the Hardin Valley community less houses bigger lots. Greenways, parks etc. This in someway should benefit the community if it goes in. We need a park for kids, an area families can gather, greenways for walking. That’s what this community needs.
March 5, 2021
at 7:03 AM
3-SB-21-C
Scott
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Scott (N/A), March 5, 2021 at 7:59 AM
This project will be a disaster for our area. I oppose this completely. We already have enough trouble with the golfers racing down the road we don’t need another 1000 cars a day on this road.
March 5, 2021
at 7:59 AM
3-SB-21-C
Betty
37871
3-SB-21-C
Betty (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:46 AM
I oppose the development of 482 lots on Ruggles Ferry RD
March 5, 2021
at 8:46 AM
3-SB-21-C
Justin
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:53 AM
I’m against the construction plan to build 482 on Blake Lane.
March 5, 2021
at 8:53 AM
3-SB-21-C
Brad
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 9:52 AM
I’m opposed to this project!
March 5, 2021
at 9:52 AM
3-SB-21-C
Becca
37871
3-SB-21-C
Becca (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:09 AM
Good morning. I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed development, "Innsbruck Farms" planned for N Ruggles Ferry Pike at Blake Road, case file number 3-SB-21-C. I live directly across from the proposed entrance into this subdivision. 482 houses, I feel, does not fit the current setting of this area. There is nothing in our community that dense. The closest subdivision that could even compare is Shannon Valley Farms with 2.1 DU/Acre with 91 units on 154.7 acres. Innsbruck Farms is proposing 482 units on 171.88 acres. This is so misplaced for our community. Also the roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to main highways can't not support the amount of traffic that 482 houses will add. Cash Road, Burris Road, Arms Road and Pleasant HIll Road are all connecting roads that now can't handle the traffic. None of these roads are lined and most aren't wide enough for 2 cars while passing.

I'm not against development in our community, but I feel like this development does not have the community at heart.
March 5, 2021
at 10:09 AM
3-SB-21-C
Valerie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Valerie (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:34 AM
I am in opposition of the 485 house development being planned for Blake Lane. There is not adequate demand or infrastructure in that area for that many new homes. It should also be considered that less than a mile away Neals Landing is also being expanded to add hundreds of houses. Our current schools (especially Carter Elementary and Middle) do not have the space for students for a new build of this size. Those issues need to be addressed BEFORE a new subdivision of this size should even be considered. In addition, the land to house ratio of this proposed subdivision is WAY too low. If this passes I would hope it is at least for a lower number of houses on that amount of acreage to provide for a larger yard and maintain the standards set by the homes that have been built in that area in the last 20 years. And also requiring greenways and such like are being required in areas such as Hardin Valley will new subdivision development. The people of east Knox county deserve the same!
March 5, 2021
at 10:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
Leslie
37924
3-SB-21-C
Leslie (37924), March 5, 2021 at 11:12 AM
This proposed subdivision would have terrible repercussions for the community. There would be too much traffic for the county roads affected to handle. Excessive speed on Ruggles Ferry Pk is already a problem and the added traffic would be a hazard. The schools in the community could also become overcrowded. A subdivision of this size should not be built in this area.
March 5, 2021
at 11:12 AM
3-SB-21-C
Brent
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brent (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:19 AM
I oppose the development of 482 homes.
March 5, 2021
at 11:19 AM
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah
37871
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:23 AM
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed development of 482 lots off Ruggles Ferry Pike. I am a home owner less than a mile from this development. I do not feel the current landscape of the community will support this number of homes, families or vehicles on Ruggles Ferry. I hope you will reconsider the desires of the community and reject this proposal.
March 5, 2021
at 11:23 AM
3-SB-21-C
Pam
37871
3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:26 AM
Too many houses for this small area. Too much traffic for small roads
March 5, 2021
at 11:26 AM
3-SB-21-C
Brittany
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brittany (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM
I think this is a terrible idea... It will crowed the Carter school community make the roads so busy
March 5, 2021
at 12:34 PM
3-SB-21-C
Kristen
37721
3-SB-21-C
Kristen (37721), March 5, 2021 at 12:46 PM
This road cannot support this type of development nor can Carter Elem.
March 5, 2021
at 12:46 PM
3-SB-21-C
Brad
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM
I am a member of the community and live less than a mile from the proposed site. I am writing to oppose the development. The landscape will not support the amount of homes projected on the development. Secondly, it will add an unacceptable and unsafe amount of traffic for Ruggles Ferry Pike and the surrounding roads. There are no roads in the area, other than Ruggles Ferry, to accommodate the amount of traffic the subdivision will bring. 428 homes times two cars (at least) each. That's close to 1000 vehicles on small country roads. I strongly support the denial of this development going forward and would hope the commission listens to the people it will effect the most. I urge the commission to vote against the development.
March 5, 2021
at 12:55 PM
3-SB-21-C
Brad
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM
I am a member of the community and live less than a mile from the proposed site. I am writing to oppose the development. The landscape will not support the amount of homes projected on the development. Secondly, it will add an unacceptable and unsafe amount of traffic for Ruggles Ferry Pike and the surrounding roads. There are no roads in the area, other than Ruggles Ferry, to accommodate the amount of traffic the subdivision will bring. 428 homes times two cars (at least) each. That's close to 1000 vehicles on small country roads. I strongly support the denial of this development going forward and would hope the commission listens to the people it will effect the most. I urge the commission to vote against the development.
March 5, 2021
at 12:55 PM
3-SB-21-C
Whitney
3-SB-21-C
Whitney March 5, 2021 at 1:04 PM
I live off Ruggles Ferry Road and I am very troubled about nearly 500 houses being built in our neighborhood.

My immediate neighbors and I all own at least 5 acres of pristine east Tennessee land.

The houses closer to the proposed subdivision are beautiful, golf course homes with an acre or more between each on.

It's the type of neighborhood where kids feel safe, neighbors visit on porches and people feel safe walking along the road soaking up the sunshine and enjoying the fresh air.

We love land, trees, peace, quiet and space between ourselves to stretch out and breathe deep in east Knoxville.

If you drive along Ruggles Ferry Road, you'll notice beautiful family farms and road signs to watch out for tractors on the road.

We love the simple, uncomplicated, uncluttered and QUIET life out here.

482 homes would create a traffic nightmare on this little road and end our peaceful solitude along the Holston River.

It would end our country way of life with extra traffic and hoards of people buzzing around.

It would max out our local school's capacities to provide quality education for our kids.

The size and quality of houses within Innsbruck Farms would reduce our current property values.

This is a neighborhood where the newer homes built in the last 20 years are 4,000-5,000 square foot.

Innsbruck Farms homes would barely be what... ~ 1,200 square foot to fit 3 houses per acre.

Please take the time on a lovely Sunday afternoon to walk, bike or drive around our relaxed, east Knox County neighborhood and enjoy our Holston River views towards House Mountain.

And please vote to reduce the houses to 1 per acre (or ideally 1 per 2 acres lol).

We would welcome 100 new neighbors but 482 is insane.

We do not want to become Turkey Creek East.
March 5, 2021
at 1:04 PM
3-SB-21-C
Chad
37871
3-SB-21-C
Chad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 1:10 PM
I oppose this development
March 5, 2021
at 1:10 PM
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (N/A), March 5, 2021 at 1:21 PM
First of all, that you for taking your time to read my email. Please don’t allow this huge development to happen! There would be tremendous traffic congestion on our two lane rural road. I have lived on Graves Road for 50 of my 57 years and our community does not want such a huge development! How would the Carter schools even accommodate all of the potential children? All of the roads that feed into Asheville Highway are extremely narrow, so how would traffic be for those roads? Please, please let our community stay a small rural community!
March 5, 2021
at 1:21 PM
3-SB-21-C
Whitney
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Whitney (N/A), March 5, 2021 at 1:24 PM
I live off Ruggles Ferry Road and I am very troubled about nearly 500 houses being built in our neighborhood.

My immediate neighbors and I all own at least 5 acres of pristine east Tennessee land.

The houses closer to the proposed subdivision are beautiful, golf course homes with an acre or more between each on.

It's the type of neighborhood where kids feel safe, neighbors visit on porches and people feel safe walking along the road soaking up the sunshine and enjoying the fresh air.

We love land, trees, peace, quiet and space between ourselves to stretch out and breathe deep in east Knoxville.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210305132451.pdf
March 5, 2021
at 1:24 PM
3-SB-21-C
travis
37871
3-SB-21-C
travis (37871), March 5, 2021 at 2:56 PM
Please see attached. Thank you
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210305145606.pdf
March 5, 2021
at 2:56 PM
3-SB-21-C
Jody
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jody (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:27 PM
I am very concerned about the amount of traffic and the affect this project will have on our schools
March 5, 2021
at 7:27 PM
3-SB-21-C
Justin
37914
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37914), March 5, 2021 at 7:28 PM
Knox County has set aside East Knoxville for the preservation of farmland and protection of wildlife. What is the EPA and TVA response to the impact of mass development to the natural resources of the area?
March 5, 2021
at 7:28 PM
3-SB-21-C
Frances
37914
3-SB-21-C
Frances (37914), March 5, 2021 at 7:31 PM
Being a Realtor in the community I do need more homes to sell, but small lots are not what I hear customers are looking to purchase! The locals and all the out of town buyers that are moving to East Tennessee are asking me to find them homes on 1 acre++ I sold 14 homes in this neighborhood in 2020 and all were on 1 acre ++ There is a way to honor the community and the ancestors of this farm land community. Have you all considered an agrihood? What about a Liveonafarm agrihood community with a pavilion for a CSA Farmers Market and a community garden? The new model of living that is popping up across the country taps into the local food movement.
March 5, 2021
at 7:31 PM
3-SB-21-C
Paul
37871
3-SB-21-C
Paul (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:43 PM
Although not opposed to development, I believe this proposed project is completely inconsistent with the area. It should be approved at much less dense level.At least, please table this action until a later date to give more time for citizens review.
March 5, 2021
at 7:43 PM
3-SB-21-C
Derek
37924
3-SB-21-C
Derek (37924), March 5, 2021 at 7:48 PM
I strongly oppose this development as presented. Its high density doesn’t fit our rural area and will create tremendous traffic and related safety issues. Rather than 1/4 to 1/3 acre lots with 482 houses, we would support 1/2 acre or larger lots with up to 150 or so houses. The present plan couldn’t be farther from the development recommended in the 2017 East Knox County Plan. Thanks you for your consideration.
March 5, 2021
at 7:48 PM
3-SB-21-C
Deborah
37924
3-SB-21-C
Deborah (37924), March 5, 2021 at 8:09 PM
I strongly oppose the development as proposed. Adding that many homes will create major traffic and safety concerns. Ruggles Ferry is the only lined road. All of the other roads that will be traveled heavily are narrow, non-lined, windy roads with many blind curves and hills. Examples Burris, Cash, Pleasant Hill, etc. Thank you for hearing my concern.
March 5, 2021
at 8:09 PM
3-SB-21-C
Allen
37871
3-SB-21-C
Allen (37871), March 5, 2021 at 9:34 PM
I oppose this massive build.
March 5, 2021
at 9:34 PM
3-SB-21-C
Carl
37924
3-SB-21-C
Carl (37924), March 5, 2021 at 9:56 PM
We don't need this in our community. There will be to much traffic and waste of good farm land I farm and it's hard enough now to drive a tractor and transport hay equipment and with this it will be a heck of alot harder. The water line won't hold that much not the electric it will put to much of a load on things
March 5, 2021
at 9:56 PM
3-SB-21-C
Darrell
37871
3-SB-21-C
Darrell (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:31 PM
As a resident of the community I believe the proposed development is to large. The road network surrounding the development is not designed to accommodate the amount of traffic 482 new units would generate.
March 5, 2021
at 10:31 PM
3-SB-21-C
Shirley
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shirley (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:12 AM
Dear Commissioners, Thank you for considering my concerns in the development known as,Innsbruck Farms. This 482 acre is one of the most dense proposals in the county. The traffic study indicates that more than 4,000 vehicles will will filter onto Ruggles Ferry and it's few subsidiary side streets. We are still proud to be an agricultural area. Farm equipment use Ruggles Ferry with slow-moving equipment. As you know, most of this two-lane road is double-lined, no pass zone. We have all witnessed what happens when frustrated drivers take risks.

We are seeing a growth in our part of the county. I am aware of three other smaller developments being proposed. I am very concerned about the impact of this greatly increased student population will have on Carter Schools.

We respectfully ask that a decision be delayed since our community was only made aware of this impactful development. Thank you
March 6, 2021
at 9:12 AM
3-SB-21-C
Mary Gail
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary Gail (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:34 AM
I oppose the development of Innsbruck Farms as proposed. The housing density is not in keeping with immediate neighborhood and general east Knox County area. We choose to retire here over 5 years ago. After living in “subdivisions” in Dallas, Houston, and California, we were attracted to the slower pace semi-rural nature of this area. West Knoxville certainly offered more of the amenities we were accustomed to (shopping, doctors, restaurants) but we were willing to make the extra drive to enjoy surroundings of natural beauty and open spaces. We have seen too many blighted landscapes of cheek by jowl rooflines on postage stamp, scraped earth parcels of land. They are an abomination here, an insult to current residents and a testament to heedless & unconscionable profit mongering. I do not oppose all development. I do oppose this proposed plan of suffocating density. It does not belong in our neighborhood.
March 6, 2021
at 9:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jeffrey
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jeffrey (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:52 AM
Let me first say that the meeting scheduled for Monday needs to be postponed to a later date. the citizens of this area need more time to gather facts, information, and plans to work in concert with the developer. I have not spoken to anyone who is against well planned and thought out growth and development. The proposed size and density of Innsbruck Farms brings with it many concerns, including but not limited too, dramatic traffic increase, sewage handling, traffic and pedestrian safety on Ruggles Ferry and connecting side roads, and current property values. This area does not have the infrastructure to handle a development of this size, and continue the quality of life for those who live here. I have lived on Ruggles Ferry for 57 years and have witnessed well planned growth and development. The proposed size of this development, and the safety concerns it brings is the exact opposite of well planned and thought out. The proposed Innsbruck Farms development is about nothing more than cramming in as many homes as possible, and making the most money possible, without concern for the surrounding community and the citizens who live here. As stated earlier, I am not against growth and development: however, I am opposed to development that is bereft of common sense, and concern for the surrounding community and its people. Thank you for your thought and attention regarding this urgent matter. Sincerely, Jeff McMillan
March 6, 2021
at 10:52 AM
3-SB-21-C
Garlena
37871
3-SB-21-C
Garlena (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM
Please accept my letter of opposition for the Innsbruck Farms development proposed off Ruggles Ferry Pike.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306110323.pdf
March 6, 2021
at 11:03 AM
3-SB-21-C
Melinda
37924
3-SB-21-C
Melinda (37924), March 6, 2021 at 11:04 AM
I not against growth in our community but I believe 400 + houses are the extreme! My biggest problem is the roads.. PLEASE before approving this ride on these roads.. Wooddale, Cash, Pleasant Hill & especially Burris Rd. These are small roads that if passing a wide truck not to mention a school bus you have to stop!!! School busses with precious cargo + 1000 more cars! The red lights lights at the end of Ruggles will not help the back roads!! And the roads should be fixed before any houses go up! Please think about the safety of our children & NO one should have to cross the road to get their mail... Death trap!
March 6, 2021
at 11:04 AM
3-SB-21-C
Donald
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:05 AM
Please accept this as my opposition to the Innsbruck Farms development proposed off Ruggles Ferry Pike.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306110555.pdf
March 6, 2021
at 11:05 AM
3-SB-21-C
Robbie
7871
3-SB-21-C
Robbie (7871), March 6, 2021 at 11:19 AM
Development is out of character with current homes and lots. Feeder roads are not designed to handle the extra traffic this development will produce. We moved here for peace and simplicity from west Knoxville. Please don’t destroy this area.
March 6, 2021
at 11:19 AM
3-SB-21-C
Justin
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:21 AM
I respectfully oppose the plans for Innsbruck Farms. Growth and development is good but it is a travesty to learn that the current plans for this development if not ratified would result in the most densely populated subdivision in Knox county. We are not west Knoxville. We do not have the infrastructure, developments, schools and other public amenities to support a development of 482 lots in this area especially considering other planned developments in this area. The people of our community need the MPC to support our opposition and vote to limit the number of lots in this development. We support the decision to develop but this level of density will be a detriment to our community and the proposal clearly doesn’t take into consideration the negative impacts on our residents. Rather it’s only about squeezing in the most homes to make the most profits possible for the developer and land owner. Please consider to delay and oppose the current plans so that we may keep everyone’s best interests in consideration. Thanks Justin Cate
March 6, 2021
at 11:21 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jeanine
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jeanine (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:25 AM
I am opposed to the proposed development, (Innsbruck) , on the basis of the density of # of homes per acre. 480 homes is way out of line if you consider the already established area surrounding the Innsbruck project. I strongly encourage you to table your vote re: Innsbruck.  more time to consider other ratios within reason.  The affect this project will have long term is far too important and should not be rushed through. This was just brought to our attention  in the last month. In summary..... concerns are: traffic increase; peaceful setting that we invested in; impact on wildlife; community safety; further impact regarding increased interest in future developments.
March 6, 2021
at 11:25 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jim and Donna
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jim and Donna (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:34 AM
We are concerned and opposed to the subject development in our area. Reasons for this opposition include the impact on the traffic on 2-lane Ruggles Ferry Pike and also side roads that are sometimes difficult to maneuver because of the roads being narrow and winding. We see new housing going on around us continually, but the number proposed for this area seems unreasonable and would like to see a reduction in the number of houses on this property. Another concern is about the schools in the area being able to handle the possible increase in students. Thank you for taking the time to hear our community's concerns.
March 6, 2021
at 11:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jessica
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jessica (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:26 PM
My family lives 2 miles from new development that is proposing 482 homes. We are 100% against this. Our small two lane road cannot accommodate such traffic. We are very concerned for the safety of our community.
March 6, 2021
at 12:26 PM
3-SB-21-C
Julia
37871
3-SB-21-C
Julia (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:47 PM
My husband and I strongly disagree with this high-density planned development with crowding homes on small lots when the uniformity of the surrounding area is lots at a minimum of 1 acre. Reasons as an insufficient traffic safety was performed during a pandemic, a Level 3 Traffic Study is requested. Existing infrastructure issues now and an increase of 482 homes will only impact that further. The duration of living through a construction zone for 10 years. The horrible affect on the living creatures in the environment. Safety concern of traffic issues with accessing our homes.

We oppose this high-density development but would appreciate a lower-density development of 1 acre per home at a minimum, for our safety and livelihood.
March 6, 2021
at 12:47 PM
3-SB-21-C
Larry
37924
3-SB-21-C
Larry (37924), March 6, 2021 at 2:20 PM
Opposition to this Concept PlanReasons1. Traffic could not handle: Ashville Hwy, Ruggles Ferry Rd, Burris RD, Wooddale Rd, and Cash Rd2. Danger to residents due to massive construction of homes, roads sewer, water, Electrical work (KUB), Xfinity. AT&T 3. Community does not have facilities in this area to handle the mass number of people that would be relocating here4. Changing a rural Framing community, large lots for residential homes, to massive housing development5. Destroying the tranquility and environment of this area
March 6, 2021
at 2:20 PM
3-SB-21-C
Pam
37871
3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), March 6, 2021 at 2:21 PM
I am seriously concerned about the traffic safety issues and the overwhelming burden the Innsbrook Farms development would place on our schools in the Carter community. I vehemently oppose the proposed development plan. Thank you.
March 6, 2021
at 2:21 PM
3-SB-21-C
rebecca
37924
3-SB-21-C
rebecca (37924), March 6, 2021 at 2:41 PM
1-we live in this area for forty years because we wanted a quiet, peaceful, country setting. the increased traffic, planned subdivision of 480 homes will destroy this setting due to extreme overcrowding, noise pollution, increase traffic which leads to increased accidents on these narrow country roads. i am not opposed to building in this area but it should be where it fits into the country flavor of this area and reflects the homes already built on Ruggles Ferry. possibly decrease the number of homes by half the number proposed.
March 6, 2021
at 2:41 PM
3-SB-21-C
Jennifer
37764
3-SB-21-C
Jennifer (37764), March 6, 2021 at 3:09 PM
To whom it may concern, We strongly oppose the proposed build of 482 homes in our rural community of Strawberry Plains. I live in River Islands subdivision, so I am in favor of proper development, as long as it is thoughtful. Many family and loved ones will be strongly affected by this plan, from their home/road/land, schools, lifestyle, privacy and safety. I grew up in East Knoxville, and these small back roads are not built to support this type of development. I have been entirely disappointed to hear of the proposed plan and hope that the builder might reconsider. I think the Carter community needs “less of the same” and instead build more upscale, custom homes with larger lot sizes that attract more economic support to our schools, churches and community. I strongly oppose this plan, and I hope that our many voices are heard. Thank you.
March 6, 2021
at 3:09 PM
3-SB-21-C
Josh
55555
3-SB-21-C
Josh (55555), March 6, 2021 at 4:20 PM
This project could have substantial runoff issues for the Holston river which could impact the natural species that live and around it. The river is also a big destination/attraction for people and their families from all over that enjoy recreation water sports on the Holston. The Holston and lower watersheds such as the Tennessee River are famous for its smallmouth bass which are a big draw for the Knoxville area and especially for the tourism industry. Projects like this can have lasting affects on the ecosystems for generations.
March 6, 2021
at 4:20 PM
3-SB-21-C
Randy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Randy (37871), March 6, 2021 at 7:46 PM
I attended a meeting this evening requested by the property interests and developer. After two hours of presentation and a Q&A session, I request the Planning Commission postpone a final determination on this concept plan.The reasons are the suddenness of the proposal and comments from the meeting today. By his own admission, the developer is in various stages of completing a website for the development, working on some safety and traffic concerns, considering amenities (non motorized vehicle access to the river, sidewalks, dog park, etc.), and finalizing covenants and restrictions.I support quality, safe, and sustainable development. I am very concerned that this very dense development will have unintended consequences for our community and result in very similar traffic/safety concerns endemic to This west Knox County.This is not consistent with the rural nature of East Knox County. Folks moving to our end of the county are not looking for this type dense neighborhood. This is an opportunity for the planning staff to have think a little out of the box for a unique neighborhood.If the county wants this type of development then maybe the county should fund some of the safety concerns expressed by my neighbors in our meeting today.
March 6, 2021
at 7:46 PM
3-SB-21-C
Wilma
924
3-SB-21-C
Wilma (924), March 6, 2021 at 8:46 PM
I believe this project is not proper for our rural community. Traffic is already bad, plus the speeding is daily. Plus our children and walking,bikers are in jeopardy already. Our schools will be over crowded and terrible traffic during business hours. The side roads to Asheville Highway are so narrow you have to come to a stop to be able to pass. Blind hill is at the entrance so how long would it be before someone would be killed due to the frequent speeding. Too many homes to add, should be more of a community setting like we already have.
March 6, 2021
at 8:46 PM
3-SB-21-C
RONNIE
37871
3-SB-21-C
RONNIE (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:21 PM
The current development of 482 lots for houses that are going be built takes no true data showing the roads can handle the traffic. A vehicle count was taken only on one end of Ruggles Ferry which receives the least traffic. The west end is the most traveled due to the majority are headed to West Knoxville to work. The is a major safety issue for the current community. The houses that surround that have recently been built are on at least one acre to five acre tracts of land and most all wouldn’t have built if they knew this was going to happen. The feeder roads such as Burris Road and Cash road are not adequate for two vehicles to pass in certain sections. The concern is pollution to the Holstein River from run off and holding ponds. Such beautiful farm land to be cut up with such poor planning. Not happy with development but at least could have been one house per acre to keep our rural area safe and not so congested.
March 6, 2021
at 9:21 PM
3-SB-21-C
Shannon
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM
I strongly oppose Innsbruck development as proposed. It is too dense of a project and poses a safety risk to this area. I am attaching a PDF file.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306222816.pdf
March 6, 2021
at 10:28 PM
3-SB-21-C
Elizabeth
37871
3-SB-21-C
Elizabeth (37871), March 7, 2021 at 8:18 AM
As a homeowner whose property adjoins this proposed development, I plead with the MPC to reject this concept plan. A bird's-eye view of Ruggle's Ferry Road reveals that the density of this planned subdivision is wholly out of sync with the character of this community. Twenty-five years ago, my husband and I bought nearly thirteen acres at auction and built our dream home here. We relocated from a crowded Cedar Bluff subdivision so that we could raise our four children in a place where they had room to explore, wildlife to observe, and fresh air to breathe in safety. We envisioned our grandchildren enjoying the same blessings. If the MPC approves this concept plan, you will allow this developer to bring West Knoxville to my backyard, literally---twenty lots squeezed along my property line. Please send this developer back to the drawing board. This property should be developed in a more intelligent, more respectful way that adds value to our beautiful community.
March 7, 2021
at 8:18 AM
3-SB-21-C
Sally
37924
3-SB-21-C
Sally (37924), March 7, 2021 at 11:25 AM
Please reconsider the site plan for this development. We are a RURAL community. We object to the projected noise pollution, light pollution, water pollution, and the increased traffic this dense housing development will bring to our community.
March 7, 2021
at 11:25 AM
3-SB-21-C
Vicki
37871
3-SB-21-C
Vicki (37871), March 7, 2021 at 1:07 PM
Hello, My family and I moved from a busy east Knoxville neighborhood to a beautiful 10 acre property on Shackleford Lane 7 years ago, mainly because we needed land and a barn for our six horses. Our property is very typical of other properties in this beautiful community, most houses on 5 to 15 acres aside from the large farms that remain and are actively being farmed. A high density subdivision simply does not match this community nor are the roads able to accommodate safely the kind of traffic this number of houses would bring in. Therefore we are strongly opposed to this developer's plan.
March 7, 2021
at 1:07 PM
3-SB-21-C
Brittany
30024
3-SB-21-C
Brittany (30024), March 7, 2021 at 1:35 PM
I oppose the development of 482 lots on Ruffles Ferry Pike. This will be the largest and most dense development in the entire county. There has been no study done to see the effect this will have on the environment and echo systems in the area. The roads don’t have the infrastructure to handle all of the traffic this will bring and plainly put, no one wants to see the land demolished.
March 7, 2021
at 1:35 PM
3-SB-21-C
Jill
37924
3-SB-21-C
Jill (37924), March 7, 2021 at 1:50 PM
I oppose the housing development project, and respectfully request delaying the planned development until an environmental study has been conducted. The vast density of this development will cause untold stress in this small communities infrastructure. Respectfully, Jill McMillan.
March 7, 2021
at 1:50 PM
3-SB-21-C
Roy
37924
3-SB-21-C
Roy (37924), March 7, 2021 at 2:46 PM
I am Against this Subdivision of House’s and will be willing to speak or whatever is needed to get this Stopped!!!! Thanks
March 7, 2021
at 2:46 PM
3-SB-21-C
Robert
37924
3-SB-21-C
Robert (37924), March 7, 2021 at 4:21 PM
We do not support the above mentioned project. The two main reasons being the density and the traffic. The roads that are to accommodate this project is not sufficient for the traffic. We request that you consider delaying the project until a better plan can be worked out to accommodate our community better and the neighbors surrounding the project.
March 7, 2021
at 4:21 PM
3-SB-21-C
Rhett
37924
3-SB-21-C
Rhett (37924), March 7, 2021 at 4:49 PM
I live close to the proposed development, right off one of the feeder roads (Burris Lane), on Whitlock Lane. I have lived in this house for almost 35 years and moved here to be in a rural setting. Like most I hear, I am definitely not again growth, just not the proposed "crowded city development" in the middle of the country. The feeder roads which I travel to access Ruggles Ferry and Asheville Hwy are very narrow and many times require stopping to let another vehicle pass. It seems like this proposal needs some more input before proceeding ahead. Maybe a compromise, as to the density of the project, would be both wise and definitely safer.
March 7, 2021
at 4:49 PM
3-SB-21-C
Angela
37764
3-SB-21-C
Angela (37764), March 7, 2021 at 5:00 PM
I speaking on behalf of my family that lives on Ruggles Ferry and my concern of the extra traffic it is going to cause with this proposed development. I’ve had family that has lived on this road for over 60+ years and Ruggles has become a heavy traffic area. I would ask you to allow the home owners a continuance in this,so they could work together with the developer to reach a solution with their concerns.
March 7, 2021
at 5:00 PM
3-SB-21-C
Larry
37764
3-SB-21-C
Larry (37764), March 7, 2021 at 5:03 PM
I am contacting you concerning the subdivision build on Blake Lane off Ruggles Ferry. I have family members who live across the road from where the developers want to put 482 houses on this farm land. I am asking that you grant a continuance to the homeowners to work out a solution with the developers on a solution to the obvious problems regarding this development. Thank you
March 7, 2021
at 5:03 PM
3-SB-21-C
Scott
37924
3-SB-21-C
Scott (37924), March 7, 2021 at 6:12 PM
I am AGAINST THIS Subdivision. This road cannot handle that many more cars on it. The school can’t handle that many more kids
March 7, 2021
at 6:12 PM
3-SB-21-C
Brenda
37924
3-SB-21-C
Brenda (37924), March 7, 2021 at 6:37 PM
I oppose Innsbruck development because of: Safety Roads Schools Congestion Affect on farming
March 7, 2021
at 6:37 PM
3-SB-21-C
Donna
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donna (37871), March 7, 2021 at 6:39 PM
The proposed development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry is way too many for this area. The additional number of automobiles on this stretch of the road will be very dangerous for the residents that already live along the road. They could very well be taking their lives in their hands just to walk across the road to get their mail. This community is small and rural and the residents that live there want it to remain that way. The time it will take to construct all this development will cause damage to this setting. The developer and the seller of the property are only interested in MONEY. They don't care how much this project will inconvenience the current residents. They don't care how all of the equipment going back and forth will damage the roads. They don't care how the noise will affect the peace of the neighborhood. The development should not be permitted.
March 7, 2021
at 6:39 PM
3-SB-21-C
Traci
37924
3-SB-21-C
Traci (37924), March 7, 2021 at 6:47 PM
I OPPOSE THIS HAPPENING. THE ROAD COULD NOT HANDLE THAT MUCH TRAFFIC.

IT WOULD ALSO BE VERY DANGEROUS FOR FARMERS WHO ARE TRYING TO TRAVEL DOWN ROAD WITH HAY OR TAKING CARE OF LIVESTOCK. I AM NOT SURE HOW THEY COULD SAFELY MANUVER DOWN RUGGLES FERRY WITH THAT MANY PEOPLE.

I AM NOT SURE HOW OUR ROAD COULD SUPPORT THAT MUCH TRAFFIC. HOW COULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO EVERY MOVE UP OR DOWN THE ROAD WITHOUT HEAVY TRAFFIC.

I AM ALSO OPPOSE TO THE NUMBER OF HOMES PER ACRE. MOST HOMES ON THIS ROAD HAVE AT LEAST AN ACRE.

March 7, 2021
at 6:47 PM
3-SB-21-C
Patricia B.
37924
3-SB-21-C
Patricia B. (37924), March 8, 2021 at 6:56 AM
I do not support the development that is planned for Ruggles Ferry Pike. I have lived there for MANY years and seen many changes. I want it added that I OPPOSE any development outside of one family homes in our beautiful community. DON'T LET THEM DESTROY IT.
March 8, 2021
at 6:56 AM
3-SB-21-C
Julie
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Julie (N/A), March 8, 2021 at 8:34 AM
Attached is our letter of objection to this development. One added comment is that there are homes still for sell in surrounding developments in this area.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308083424.pdf
March 8, 2021
at 8:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
Shannon
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:38 AM
I am writing to oppose 3-SB-21-C a new development in East Knoxville near Ruggles Ferry Golf Course. I have included a letter that I would appreciate you taking the time to read and consider.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308083847.pdf
March 8, 2021
at 8:38 AM
3-SB-21-C
Frank H.
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Frank H. (N/A), March 8, 2021 at 8:43 AM
Residents in the Strawberry Plains area have recently been made aware of a new development, “Innsbruck Farms" positioned on the banks of the Holston River in Strawberry Plains. This development consists of 482 homes on 171 acres of land, and currently ranks in the top three highest density populations in Knox County. Notwithstanding the impact on existing infrastructure, traffic, etc., the impacts on the ecosystem bear investigation. In contrast, I oppose the development as a Sportsmen, Conservationist, and a Champion of Environmental Quality simply due to the run-off into the Holston River.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308084333.pdf
March 8, 2021
at 8:43 AM
3-SB-21-C
Allen
37871
3-SB-21-C
Allen (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:00 AM
We oppose the Innsbruck Farms development. The concept plan shows 482 lots on 171 acres. The current infrastructure along Ruggles Ferry Pike cannot handle this type of development.
March 8, 2021
at 9:00 AM
3-SB-21-C
Allen
3-SB-21-C
Allen March 8, 2021 at 9:07 AM
I oppose the Innsbruck Farms development due to the housing density that is proposed. The current infrastructure along North Ruggles Ferry Pike cannot handle this size of development.

I'm not opposed to growth however I am opposed to 3 home per acre type builds.
March 8, 2021
at 9:07 AM
3-SB-21-C
Michael (Bo)
37871
3-SB-21-C
Michael (Bo) (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:28 AM
Please see attached letter dated 03-08-2021
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308092809.pdf
March 8, 2021
at 9:28 AM
3-SB-21-C
Stanley
37871
3-SB-21-C
Stanley (37871), March 8, 2021 at 11:41 AM
Concerning the plan to build 482 homes on 171 Acres or 2.8 homes per acre. Concern #1 traffic on Ruggles Ferry Pk, which is already a busy 2 lane road. With 482 homes and 2 cars per home there would be 964 vehicles. To get to Ashville Highway many would travel Buris Rd., Cash Rd., or Weeddale Rd. All are very narrow and heavily populated with many children playing and people walking and riding bikes; they will not be able to handle this amount of traffic. Recent traffic count paid for by the developer on the other end of Ruggles going toward Strawberry Plains does not come close to the amount of traffic going toward Knoxville or the interstate. This amount of traffic on these narrow roads will cause many accidents, as well as, serious injuries and deaths. This property has 2 creeks that empty into the Holston River. The current plan to build this many homes cannot contain run off and will pollute the river. This amount of homes will also overpopulate Carter Schools. Construction using heavy equipment and trucks will destroy Ruggles Ferry Pk. This community does not attempt to keep from growing. This property could be a very nice development with larger lots and houses. This type of development will destroy our community as I have known it for 78 years. Please do your job and help our community to reach a better plan for the number of homes on this property.
March 8, 2021
at 11:41 AM
3-SB-21-C
Kevin
37918
3-SB-21-C
Kevin (37918), March 8, 2021 at 11:43 AM
See attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308114356.pdf
March 8, 2021
at 11:43 AM
3-SB-21-C
Janet and Robbie
3-SB-21-C
Janet and Robbie March 8, 2021 at 12:11 PM
My husband, Robbie, and I are opposed to this proposal as presented to us by the developers Saturday afternoon at neighborhood meeting. The proposed development is too dense for the character of our neighborhood. Consideration has not been given to the impact it will have on roads, schools and ecology of the area.

We were surprised when we heard this was happening and need more time to research and talk with developers as we are all affected by huge change.

Why try to bring west Knoxville here? Space is the character of east Knoxville. Help us keep it that way. Is this really the biggest neighborhood project in Knox County?
March 8, 2021
at 12:11 PM
3-SB-21-C
Susan & Tom
37871
3-SB-21-C
Susan & Tom (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:44 PM
We are opposed to the Innsbruck Farms proposal as submitted. See pdf attachment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308124430.pdf
March 8, 2021
at 12:44 PM
3-SB-21-C
Brandon & Kendra
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brandon & Kendra (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:45 PM
We oppose the development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. The numbers of houses is way too much for this area. Our farmers on tractors up and down this road are now in danger due to the high traffic that this development will bring. Our roads are now in danger. Our school system in the Carter community is not even equipped for this. We truly love our small and RURAL community and how we wish it could stay this way. This development should NOT be permitted. We strongly oppose.
March 8, 2021
at 12:45 PM
3-SB-21-C
Joshua
37924
3-SB-21-C
Joshua (37924), March 8, 2021 at 1:31 PM
I grew up in the Carter community. As a part of the Blake family I have fond memories of my grandfather "Rennie" and how he lived as a farmer and integral member of this community. Tractor rides with my grandfather on Ruggles Ferry Road, snapping beans with my grandmother Lillian, fishing for turtles to sell, seeing the interactions between my family and the community as they picked their own crops and took them to the store to pay and converse...these are a few of the memories and legacy of this area. Like many who are concerned with the new development I am not opposed to bringing more people into this area to enjoy it as well, but I am concerned that a massive housing development would forever change the feel and legacy that my family has had the privilege to be a part of for decades and centuries in truth. I have moved back to this area in hopes that my children will be able to appreciate the land and its people as I have. We have begun to use the land that my grandparents kept to pass on to us. My wife and I only have the beginnings of a small farm with chickens and a garden starting, but our plans are to expand and see what all we can accomplish in farming as a family in the years to come. I don't think the feel and spirit of area is to have the kind of development that has been proposed. I am not asking to halt everything all together, only to more carefully consider what the ramifications will be of such an undertaking. Thank you.
March 8, 2021
at 1:31 PM
3-SB-21-C
Tim
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tim (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:03 PM
I live near the proposed development and I am strongly opposed to this Concept Plan and the negative impact on our community. I am supportive of well thought out planned development, but this plan fails in so many areas. This is one of the largest and highest density plans in all of Knox County to build 482 homes in our community. Our rural community will have major negative impact on our traffic, safety, infrastructure, side or feeder roads, and change the perspective of our entire rural character forever! This plan is not in alignment with the East Knox County Sector and East Knox Community Plans that were provided to give guidance for these types of future developments - in fact this is contrary to all of the primary objectives of those plans for future well thought out development. The traffic study accompanying this plan calls for significant recommendations from the negative impact of 4,400+ new daily trips as a result of this new planned development. I respectfully request a postponement of the March 11th meeting and allow our community 30-60 days to respond to the developer on this plan which is still being changed weekly. Thanks for your consideration.
March 8, 2021
at 2:03 PM
3-SB-21-C
Bill
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bill (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:14 PM
See attached file
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308141419.pdf
March 8, 2021
at 2:14 PM
3-SB-21-C
Herbert
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Herbert (N/A), March 8, 2021 at 3:40 PM
I’m contacting you about Innsbruck Farms development (Item 22, file #3-SB-21-C) This project came to the attention of the community about 3 weeks ago. There were many attempts to reach the developers with questions. We finally met with a representative on March 6th. Their plan is not complete and has changed many times in the 3 weeks. The traffic study showed an additional 4,400 trips per day on Ruggles Ferry Pike. Not to mention very narrow roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to Asheville Highway. Our community is not trying to stop the development, but simply asking the developers to be more responsible and sensitive to our rural community. In the +-5,700 acres that make up our community between the Holston River and Asheville Hwy & AJ Highway, there are approximately 800 homes. This developer is proposing 482 homes on +- 200 acres. We are asking for at least a 30 postponement, but a 60 day postponement would be better. I’m asking for your help. Again, we are not trying to stop development in our area, instead we are asking for developers and MPC be sensitive to our rural character. Also, efforts mentioned in the East Knox Community Plan which was adopted in 2017, have been for the most part not been considered in this plan. This is an opportunity for Knox County to have a showcase development. But 482 homes on +-200 acres is just not acceptable to our community. We want to work with the developer.
March 8, 2021
at 3:40 PM
3-SB-21-C
Mary Beth
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:23 PM
As a lifetime resident of this community, I am writing to oppose the massive Innsbruck Farms subdivision. I am not opposed to a property owner wanting to develop his land nor am I opposed to welcome new neighbors. But anyone can look and see how our rural community looks. This obnoxiously sized subdivision does nothing to offer beneficial growth. Its throwing in 482 homes that our roads, schools and even emergency services can not support. It will ruin the community for those of us who have loved and supported and want the best for not just ourselves but for our neighbors as well. We politely and strongly urge you to refuse this massive development and encourage the developer to plan a development that benefits not only him but the whole community. I also ask that you consider yourself personally in this matter and what you would want if you were faced with a neighborhood destroying development. Please allow our community to keep its rural setting
March 8, 2021
at 4:23 PM
3-SB-21-C
Hali
37871
3-SB-21-C
Hali (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:25 PM
I read an article stating there was no way to stop the build of this subdivision, but is there any way to tremendously downsize? Residents of this area love that they have big yards, and livable ground. Putting this many houses in one area will not only be an eye sore, it will absolutely take away from the rural part of our community. Not to mention traffic concerns. There's a projected 1,000 car increase, and that's not what we need, especially in this particular area. Blake Lane is a dead end road, it's quiet, no traffic, we don't want, or need subdivision access on our road. We like quiet, laid back, and we most certainly love the view that we have without adding almost 500 houses and tons of cars in and out. This isn't the city. I understand the builders and contractors making money and creating revenue, but I don't believe it should be done at the expense of the Ruggles Ferry community.
March 8, 2021
at 4:25 PM
3-SB-21-C
Kraig
3787
3-SB-21-C
Kraig ( 3787), March 8, 2021 at 4:27 PM
Due to the size of the proposed development and the short notice given to the community I feel that a continuation on the hearing is warranted We. need to be able to deliver our concerns.
March 8, 2021
at 4:27 PM
3-SB-21-C
Catherine
37871
3-SB-21-C
Catherine (37871), March 8, 2021 at 6:03 PM
Hello, I am a member of the Carter Community and very concerned about this proposed development. While I am not opposed to forward progress and development as a whole, the size and range of homes proposed as part of this plan are unfortunately not in alignment with the surrounding area nor reflective of the type of development most desired by the community. There are numerous subdivisions already established in our community, two of which are currently expanding, that offer the same housing options that are being proposed. What our community doesn't have, and can support, is a housing range that is a step higher offering larger lots with custom homes that is complementary to what is already being built in that area. Personally, my family, and several like mine that have ties to and are grounded in this community, are looking for homes in the $400k and up range that have more spacious lots. Continuing on with this proposed plan will also very likely drive many of the invested families that have built nearby to move elsewhere outside of our community. That means they are also taking their economic value with them and unfortunately leaving a large void in their wake. The goal would be to build up our community value not diminish it. I hope you consider not moving forward with such a large development that doesn't support a long term need and does not serve our community. Thank you.
March 8, 2021
at 6:03 PM
3-SB-21-C
Jeff
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jeff (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:35 PM
I feel that the housing density of this planned subdivision is to much for the area it is in. I am not opposed to developing the land just not at this volume with more land in the area that has the ability to be developed in the future. It will put the poeple on this road in a dangerous future if the density is allowed to start at this rate
March 8, 2021
at 8:35 PM
3-SB-21-C
Beth
37871
3-SB-21-C
Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:18 PM
The proposed development of Innsbruck Farms should be reconsidered in regards to the number of houses intended to be built. A sudden growth of such magnitude for this area would greatly negatively affect the present surroundings. Further accurate assessments of the traffic situation should be performed to see the true ramifications of the proposed addition of 483 homes on the rural country roads running near this property. I am not opposed to the development taking place, but feel a reduction of homes involved would be better suited for the area. Doubling the lot sizes and reducing the number of homes in half would seem like a reasonable resolution to consider. I understand the necessity of business and profit, but feel this should not supersede doing the right thing in development of this project. I ask that more time be given to reconsider the present plan and make changes that would be more appropriate for the community while still providing a reasonable profit for the developer. Thank you.
March 8, 2021
at 9:18 PM
3-SB-21-C
David
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:26 PM
The density of this development is outrageous in comparison to the other properties in the area. I do not oppose the development, just the totally ridiculous decision to pack so many houses into it and then overload the area regarding traffic and utilities. This development just does not fit nor belong in this area in its presently proposed density. My family has been in East Knox County since the 1850’s and I have lived on Ruggles Ferry Pike the past 15 years. The rural character of this area should be preserved as much as possible even as it is understood that growth and development are inevitable. The responsible way to address the issue is to propose a plan that fits the area regarding lot sizes and house density. It is readily apparent that there has been an attempt to maximize the potential profit of a packed subdivision at the expense of preserving the character of the area. Please allow time for these matters to be respectfully discussed so that any reasonable alternatives can be explored regarding density and so that further evaluation of the effects on traffic and utilities can be properly assessed. Thank you. David L. Parker, DDS
March 8, 2021
at 9:26 PM
3-SB-21-C
Elyse
37924
3-SB-21-C
Elyse (37924), March 8, 2021 at 10:12 PM
As a resident in the area, I am very concerned about not only how it will change the feel and look of the area (the reason we moved here last fall), but also the safety and feasibility of adding such an enormous development. Our little road off of Ruggles Ferry can barely handle two cars passing each other as it is. The extra traffic on the feeder roads as well as Ruggles Ferry itself is a huge safety concern. I’m also worried, as a Realtor, if that many houses in a rural area subdivision will truly sell. I haven’t had a client in 3 years wanting to move INTO a subdivision. I wonder if the first phase of homes don’t sell as the developer hopes, if the remaining lots will be snatched up by a big name builder who will build cheap, unsightly homes and further ruin the land that has been a treasured part of this community for generations. The wildlife alone would be reason enough to conserve the land. When you add safety concerns - and if a traffic study was done on the side roads (which people WILL use) - it’s unbelievable such a project is even being considered by Knox county. I implore you not to allow this to happen to our community.
March 8, 2021
at 10:12 PM
3-SB-21-C
Kelly
37924
3-SB-21-C
Kelly (37924), March 8, 2021 at 11:51 PM
I live on a road used as a cut through between Asheville Hwy and Ruggles Ferry. Our road is scary now, I cannot imagine what it will be once nearly 500 families move to our area. In my mind, that’s at least 600 more vehicles on our road. Speed, blind hills, elderly neighbors, children = safety concern. With the addition of houses on Ruggles Ferry golf course and more houses around the Graves road area have proven that our road is the main crossover between Asheville/Ruggles Ferry. On Cash Rd, we take our safety into our own hands when we leave home. Adding the additional traffic will just complicate our ability to leave home.
March 8, 2021
at 11:51 PM
3-SB-21-C
Mary
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 8:21 AM
This plan will overwhelm the community. The roads, schools and businesses are not designed to have this many people. It will change the integrity of the community and is not welcomed. Change and growth are both invited, this change is too traumic for this community.
March 9, 2021
at 8:21 AM
3-SB-21-C
David
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), March 9, 2021 at 9:12 AM
Please see attached letter of opposition for 3-SB-21-C.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309091232.pdf
March 9, 2021
at 9:12 AM
3-SB-21-C
Mary
37871
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:34 AM
I add my voice of opposition to the Concept Plan for this property. I second the concerns others have expressed about traffic, safety, burden on schools & infrastructure. Mr Chrisman admitted at our meeting with him on Saturday night that he has not performed due diligence....he has not performed market demand analysis to truly assess what buyers want. He stated”I know what demand is from builders.” He also seemed surprised to learn how much large (1-2+acres) have sold for recently, with larger, upscale homes built....homes that “fit” into the pastoral feel of the area. Homes like those surrounding his proposed development. When asked if he could consider building fewer homes on larger lots, he stated “the numbers don’t work.” Well of course we get it....scraping the land, building miles of roads and sewer lines is expensive. Perhaps those “numbers” could be different if he rethinks his plan, let’s go of his ego and works towards a different understanding of the best use of this property. He might make “the number” work with fewer roads, fewer sewers, fewer houses. Mr Chrisman should be sent back to his drawing board. We are people here, not numbers.
March 9, 2021
at 10:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
jay
37871
3-SB-21-C
jay (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:53 AM
Lot sizes are to small for the development. The houses near there are on over half an acre. I would like the developer to make the lot sizes bigger so it will maintain house value in that area.
March 9, 2021
at 10:53 AM
3-SB-21-C
Catie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Catie (37871), March 9, 2021 at 11:03 AM
Please reconsider allowing this development of over 400 new homes on Ruggles Ferry. My husband and I recently moved back home to Strawberry Plains with hopes of raising our children in a more rural area after spending the last 10 years living in large cities like Charlotte and Atlanta. We are currently building a home that will now be directly beside the entrance to this subdivision. I’m obviously concerned about the safety of my kids as they play in our yard, the traffic that will come considering there’s no infrastructure to support the added travelers, the overcrowding that will happen to the schools, the environmental impact that it will have on the river, and the way a subdivision this size would change the rural feel of this community that so many love and want to protect.
March 9, 2021
at 11:03 AM
3-SB-21-C
kevin
37871
3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 1:26 PM
I am opposed to this development as it is currently planned.

This is too much to add to this community without tremendous county (taxpayer) investment in road and other improvements. Even with those improvements, it would drastically lower the quality of life for current residents, especially during the proposed 10 year period of construction.

The Ajax transportation impact study included in the case information on the MPC website is missing about 60 pages. This is over 70% of the report that community members can't see. What's on those 60 pages? I think if it laid out plans and definite timelines showing everything would be fine, it would be there. As it is, we don't even know what was considered and what was overlooked. Is this even legal, to withhold this much of a report vital to the plan's consideration from the area stakeholders (residents)?

My more specific comments are in the attached letter. Please read it!
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309132658.pdf
March 9, 2021
at 1:26 PM
3-SB-21-C
Winston
37924
3-SB-21-C
Winston (37924), March 9, 2021 at 2:29 PM
The quick timing and short period for the residence of the area to learn about the Innsbruck Farms Development is troubling. Anytime I see something trying to be pushed through approval in a hurried manner leaves me to believe there is something amiss.

The project is too dense for the surrounding community. The surrounding 5500 acres in the Ruggles Ferry Community has a land to home ratio of over 5 acres per home. This project has a land to home ratio of .34 acres to home. This is a drastic divergence from the residential character of the area.

The developer traffic study was flawed. They didn’t study the traffic pattern to the west (towards Knoxville) of the Innsbruck development which is the direction most traffic will go when leaving this area and consequently will return from this direction. To get to Ashville Highway most of this traffic will use Burris Road and Cash Road which are the main feeder roads for this area of the community, and they are currently inadequate for the existing homes not to mention the very active Ruggles Ferry Golf course traffic. This is a huge safety issue for myself and my neighbors on Cash road and will have disastrous results if not considered and addressed.

March 9, 2021
at 2:29 PM
3-SB-21-C
Winston
37924
3-SB-21-C
Winston (37924), March 9, 2021 at 2:36 PM
My concerns about the Innsbruck Farms Development is the environmental impact this high-density development will have. This development is the first large development for RC Ruggles LLC/Blain Cristman and creates concern about this being engineered and developed correctly. With such high density the increased roofs, driveways, and roads will contribute greatly to water runoff into the Holston river.

Also, the project appears to have insufficient common area for community use. All the common areas on the map are storm water retention ponds, which have no recreational use, except one and it is a ¼ acre dog park. This is not nearly enough common area for a 200 acre tract with 480 homes.
March 9, 2021
at 2:36 PM
3-SB-21-C
kevin
37871
3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 5:38 PM
The developer is proposing 482 homes on 172 acres in this development. This calculates out to 2.80 dwelling units/acre. The knox county mpc has a useful tool to help picture what this would look like. The tool can be found at https://maps.knoxmpc.org/apps/DensityExplorer. If you will search ONLY detached housing units and set the DU/Acre slider to 2.7 to 2.8, one of the developments shown will be Creekside Manor in Hardin Valley. It's the small blue box closest to Loudon county on the map and has 2.8 dwelling units per acre according to the stats. Click on the box for aerial views to see what that looks like. That's the density the developer is planning for Innsbruck Farms. Fits in here---NOT!
March 9, 2021
at 5:38 PM
3-SB-21-C
ALLEN
37871
3-SB-21-C
ALLEN (37871), March 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309193835.pdf
March 9, 2021
at 7:38 PM
3-SB-21-C
Nathan
37871
3-SB-21-C
Nathan (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:10 PM
We moved to Blake Lane in 2016 as a way for our severely autistic daughter to finally get peace and quiet away from a neighborhood. We have had many instances where she has had severe seizures and life or death was literally decided by a matter of minutes. Ambulances have not had to worry about fighting through traffic to get to our house. This development would change that. If there were an accident on any of the roads between us and the paramedics because of the increased vehicle count, they could arrive to us too late. In addition, when getting off the interstate at Asheville Highway after work each day, I already have to wait ten minutes just to get from the exit ramp on Interstate 40 to John Sevier. I can’t imagine what all the additional cars from this development would do to the after-work commute for all of us.
March 9, 2021
at 10:10 PM
3-SB-21-C
Louis
3-SB-21-C
Louis March 10, 2021 at 7:45 AM
The current Innsbruck Farms subdivision development plan raises significant concerns regarding its impact on the Holston River.

Its proposed construction and resultant occupancy of the subdivision consists of 482 homes on 171 acres of land, an extremely high density.

Without all appropriate studies completed and then given the opportunity for public review, our concerns, given the proximity of the subdivision and it future residents to the Holston River, are for the potential of irreversible and ongoing harm to both its wildlife and downriver human inhabitants along the River including the length of its sensitive riparian environment.

Any and all agency approvals required to proceed with this development should be considered only when the required studies based on thorough and sound environmental protection policies are completed which are measurable, documented and made available for public review.

In addition, assurances should be in place during any preliminary site preparation, all construction and eventual occupancy that no harm be done whatsoever without enforceable consequences should harm occur.
March 10, 2021
at 7:45 AM
3-SB-21-C
Joshua
37871
3-SB-21-C
Joshua (37871), March 10, 2021 at 9:17 AM
The proposed subdivision is too dense for the infrastructure and the community it will be part of. The local roads are not prepared to absorb an additional 1000 vehicles and the side roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to Asheville Hwy are barely wide enough for two cars to pass as is.

Increasing the traffic by that level will not only be a nuisance to existing residents but will pose a safety hazard for other drivers and the pedestrians I see walking on Ruggles Ferry daily. There are no sidewalks or other safe areas in our community for seniors and community members to walk near their homes and this would be removing that as an option.

While I don't oppose development, this level of density will not only impact the traffic on local homes, it will also change the rural feel of our community. It would be an overall negative to quality of life and place a burden on other community members.

Home lots should be restricted to 1 acre minimum at the smallest.
March 10, 2021
at 9:17 AM
3-SB-21-C
Carl
3-SB-21-C
Carl March 10, 2021 at 1:39 PM
In addition to the 130+ comments on the MPC website (as well as the attendance of scores of concerned neighbors at recent meetings on March 5th and 6th), please note the following petitions which have been compiled in the Strawberry Plains community to oppose the Innsbruck Farms concept plan and request a postponement of the vote to approve. I trust that these numbers below speak for themselves. Thank you in advance for listening to the collective voice of concerned neighbors.

Paper Petition from Ruggles Ferry Pike neighbors and surrounding community – See attached… - ~170 physical signatures

Online petition -- https://www.thepetitionsite.com/650/917/529/oppose-concept-plan-3-sb-21-c/ - 547 electronic signatures and counting
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310133958.pdf
March 10, 2021
at 1:39 PM
3-SB-21-C
Carl
37924
3-SB-21-C
Carl (37924), March 10, 2021 at 1:45 PM
In addition to the 130+ comments on the MPC website (as well as the attendance of scores of concerned neighbors at recent meetings on March 5th and 6th), In addition to the 130+ comments on the MPC website (as well as the attendance of scores of concerned neighbors at recent meetings on March 5th and 6th), please note the following petitions which have been compiled in the Strawberry Plains community to oppose the Innsbruck Farms concept plan and request a postponement of the vote to approve. I trust that these numbers below speak for themselves. Thank you in advance for listening to the collective voice of concerned neighbors.

1. Paper Petition from Ruggles Ferry Pike neighbors and surrounding community – See attached PDF >>>>> ~170 physical signatures

2. Online petition -- https://www.thepetitionsite.com/650/917/529/oppose-concept-plan-3-sb-21-c/ >>>>>> 547 electronic signatures and counting

Thank you in advance for your time, efforts, and consideration.


View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310134541.pdf
March 10, 2021
at 1:45 PM
3-SB-21-C
Daniel
37920
3-SB-21-C
Daniel (37920), March 10, 2021 at 2:35 PM
I represent several members of the Ruggles Ferry Community who oppose the Innsbruck Farms concept plan. Please see the attached correspondence.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310143537.pdf
March 10, 2021
at 2:35 PM
3-SB-21-C
Cara Beth
37871
3-SB-21-C
Cara Beth (37871), March 10, 2021 at 6:00 PM
I am not opposed to growth in the community. I am a real estate agent and I understand the need for more housing in this area. Growth is a great thing for the community however this is a rural area and the roads and schools are not equipped to handle a development this dense. I think the residents of this area need more time to hopefully reach a compromise with the developer so that this new development will become a positive asset to our wonderful community instead of something that will push out the current residents who love it so much.
March 10, 2021
at 6:00 PM
3-SB-21-C
David
37924
3-SB-21-C
David (37924), March 10, 2021 at 7:13 PM
As an almost 30 resident of the Ruggles Ferry community I oppose the Innsbruck Farms subdivision as currently planned and ask the the developer for a postponement or for the Planning Committee to postpone 3-SB-21-C to give all parties more time for review and consideration. Please see my attached letter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310191333.pdf
March 10, 2021
at 7:13 PM
3-SB-21-C
Donald
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), March 10, 2021 at 11:52 PM
Strongly oppose this development, for the numerous reasons detailed by the 136 other people commenting thus far.

Too large and too crowded of a development for the area.Plan is totally out of character for the area.Traffic study is flawed: done in wrong direction (eastbound, not westbound) on one day only, during a pandemic when most people stayed home--does not represent the true situation.

please deny this application to overbuild a quiet, rural community.
March 10, 2021
at 11:52 PM
3-SB-21-C
Scott
37924
3-SB-21-C
Scott (37924), March 11, 2021 at 11:34 AM
The planning for this is a sham. Little notice was given to the community in what appears to be an attempt to railroad this through. The traffic study that was "done" is completely inadequate as it did not study any of the other roads other than rubbles ferry. Burris rd will not handle 1000 cars a day "their estimate" as the traffic now is less than 20 cars a day. A further traffic study should be done. As the answers the builder gave about schools and roads was that’s the county’s problem.
March 11, 2021
at 11:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
Heather
37924
3-SB-21-C
Heather (37924), March 12, 2021 at 9:12 PM
I hate that I missed getting this submitted before the hearing. But every time I thought about having too I felt sick. I’ve woken up many nights lately dreading this build. The sheer number of houses included is absurd and honestly just plain greedy on the developers part. Our community cannot handle this nor do we want to. I know what our small neighborhood did to Sunnyview community and we are only a neighborhood of 42 houses. Anyone who lives here knows we live this direction for a reason. We drive away from all the congestion. If you live in our community you know that Ruggles Ferry CANNOT handle almost 1000 more cars. Honestly it couldn’t handle 400 more cars from 180 houses. Our schools CANNOT accommodate these families. Personally I moved back to this community for all of these reasons and the fact that my family grew up here. My family are the Burrises of Burris Road. We all love our small community. This is the sort of build that will push us from our homes and to Jefferson City. Alas I know what’s going to be done is going to be done and I have very little faith that it will be the right thing.
March 12, 2021
at 9:12 PM
3-SB-21-C
Peggy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), March 17, 2021 at 6:52 PM
I am very strongly opposed to this development. Traffic study was flawed in that the counter was in front of my house on the east side of the development near A.J. High on a cold January day during a pandemic when most people were working from home. Most of the traffic will turn west towards Knoxville. Ruggles Ferry and the feeder side roads are not designed to handle the traffic. Schools are almost at capacity now. Does not fit with our rural environment. Please consider the surrounding community when looking at this proposal. We are still a farming community and want to retain our rural way of life.
March 17, 2021
at 6:52 PM
3-SB-21-C
Chris
37924
3-SB-21-C
Chris (37924), March 20, 2021 at 4:03 PM
We my wife & myself have lived on Ruggles Ferry Pike for 42 1/2 years. We built our home in 1978 and have seen more than a few changes over the years. Growth is usually good for rural areas and we feel in this case, based on facts, this is not the case. We live on a two lane road and with
the amount of traffic a 482 home sub division will add to this area will be a huge problem for all who live on or off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. Ruggles Ferry Pike is only 7 Miles Long and the proposed sub division would contain 5.5 miles of roads . We are concerned with changes to our community
and the impact on life as we have known it . One other issue is the fact that this area has been promised two parks over 10 years ago and we still do not have one. A green space like every area in Knoxville contains for walking and enjoying time with family and friends. Please take a few minutes to drive around our community and I hope you will understand why we are requesting a second look at the situation as home owners we find ourselves in. We love our community and enjoy the rural setting we are in. 
March 20, 2021
at 4:03 PM
3-SB-21-C
Mia
37924
3-SB-21-C
Mia (37924), March 27, 2021 at 10:30 AM
I oppose the volume of homes being proposed in this project. We are concerned about the volume of cars and traffic and the impact on community services and schools. We moved here because it is a low density neighborhood, so 482 homes on 200 acres will completely reverse that in the area. I have heard from many neighbors in our subdivision who also oppose these plans. Many were told there would not be such an expansion when they chose to move here, and apparently those were outright lies. This is manipulative. Please listen to those living in the area and hear their concerns, as they should have a say over the profit of those wishing to build.
March 27, 2021
at 10:30 AM
3-SB-21-C
Nicole
37924
3-SB-21-C
Nicole (37924), March 27, 2021 at 11:50 AM
The proposed Innsbruck Farms subdivision should not be allowed to move forward in its current form. This area is not designed for this volume of traffic, the schools are not capable of absorbing that many new students, and the density of homes in this cookie-cutter planned development is not going to help maintain property values of homes that have been here for a long time.

When existing AND new construction homes have been on the market for longer than the rest of Knox county here on this side of the county, I have a hard time trying to see how there is even a need for 482 new homes in this area. It seems poorly thought-out on so many levels. Quality over quantity would be much better for this area. Please consider fewer homes and homesites for this area if building has to happen. Maintaining safety and quality of life in our rural area is important to us.
March 27, 2021
at 11:50 AM
3-SB-21-C
Scott
37924
3-SB-21-C
Scott (37924), March 29, 2021 at 10:00 PM
this is an abhorrent plan for the people who live here now. I didn't move here as my neighbors didn't either to be in the middle of a housing slum. This will destroy the very fabric of our community and the reason we live here. I don't want my road widened with a 1000 cars a day on it. When I moved here I was told by the county that the smallest lot size allowed was an acre. Is this guy being allowed to do this because he's rich and bribing people?
March 29, 2021
at 10:00 PM
3-SB-21-C
Nancy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Nancy (37871), March 30, 2021 at 12:06 PM
We have several issues with Innsbruck Farms (Case #3-SB-21-C) and the proposed +/- 500 homes. First the density of the development does not even come close to matching the existing rural area of the Ruggles Ferry Community. Second is the traffic study. One study was completed on Ruggles Ferry Pike. There should be additional studies done on the feeder roads that lead to Andrew Johnson Highway. These roads include Cash Road, Burris Road, Wooddale Road and Pleasant Road. Once the commission sees these studies they will be able to see that the area cannot currently support and additional 4,500 to 5,000 additional trips by passenger cars, school busses, delivery vehicles, farm equipment and construction trucks. Third would be the capacities of our area utilities. None of the utilities have given a definitive answer if the current water, sewer, electrical, gas and sanitation would be able to handle a surge of +/- 500 homes in the area. The best answer given has been "we think". Lastly, has an environmental study been done on the acreage yet? It could be an ecological disaster if a protected specie resides inside that area and is discovered after any type of land development has begun. It is obvious that much more thought and planning needs to go into this development before any approval can be submitted and allowing the developer to move forward.
March 30, 2021
at 12:06 PM
3-SB-21-C
gloria
37924
3-SB-21-C
gloria (37924), March 30, 2021 at 6:38 PM
P lease don't approve this. Ruggles Ferry Pike can not handle the traffic that this subdivision would bring. We already have a large amount of traffic. People leaving the subdivision and going to Knoxville would travel Ruggles Ferry because the other roads are too narrow and crooked. Please consider my request
March 30, 2021
at 6:38 PM
3-SB-21-C
Scott
37917
3-SB-21-C
Scott (37917), March 30, 2021 at 11:12 PM
The level of traffic that this will cause is an abomination. We will not be able to get out of our driveway. we currently see about 20 cars a day go up and down our road and the traffic study says that will increase to a 1000. This level of development will destroy our community and the country way of life we enjoy. These people should be held to the same standard that the county told me when I moved here, that you could not have a lot size smaller than one acre. If they are being allowed to do this I want to know who they are bribing.
March 30, 2021
at 11:12 PM
3-SB-21-C
steve
37924
3-SB-21-C
steve (37924), March 31, 2021 at 8:45 AM
See attached PDF please.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210331084530.pdf
March 31, 2021
at 8:45 AM
3-SB-21-C
Fred
37871
3-SB-21-C
Fred (37871), March 31, 2021 at 9:41 PM
I have great concern for this development because of the number of houses planned and the limited road access to the site. None of the roads that would access the planned site are capable of handling the traffic flow that would be generated by this number of houses. Most of these roads (except for Ruggles Ferry) are narrow country roads that will not allow for a traffic flow of the volume that would result. Please consider limiting the number of houses that would be built in the development. I am not opposed to the development, just to the size of it/number of houses and traffic volume.
March 31, 2021
at 9:41 PM
3-SB-21-C
Kellen
37924
3-SB-21-C
Kellen (37924), April 2, 2021 at 2:59 PM
Please see attachment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210402145933.pdf
April 2, 2021
at 2:59 PM
3-SB-21-C
Staci
37924
3-SB-21-C
Staci (37924), April 5, 2021 at 12:13 PM
I do not support the Innsbruck Farms development. I am concerned about the negative effects this would have on our community.
April 5, 2021
at 12:13 PM
3-B-21-RZ
Kevin
37918
3-B-21-RZ
Kevin (37918), April 7, 2021 at 7:25 AM
This is a narrow strip of land, which raises questions about how access will be provided to each dwelling unit. The Planned Residential Stakeholder Committee viewed a similar narrow parcel on Ebenezer that was challenging due to the narrowness. Additionally, the topography could create an issue with light from higher ground streaming down to established neighbors on adjacent, low density lots zoned agricultural. Light trespass will be an issue, and appropriate screening should be required with the Use on Review.
April 7, 2021
at 7:25 AM
3-SB-21-C
charles
37924
3-SB-21-C
charles (37924), April 7, 2021 at 6:45 PM
Please don't let this pass
April 7, 2021
at 6:45 PM
1-B-21-PA
Sandra
37919
1-B-21-PA
Sandra (37919), April 7, 2021 at 8:09 PM
I hope that the request for this change in our neighborhood is denied.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210407200928.pdf
April 7, 2021
at 8:09 PM
6-I-21-UR
David
37931
6-I-21-UR
David (37931), May 17, 2021 at 9:41 AM
Please deny this request for outdoor self-storage. This company already built their 3- story indoor storage building (with 78 outdoor RV/boat parking spots) which is adjacent to this lot. See 6-D-19-UR. I can only hope the owner and the commission can find a better use of this plot.
May 17, 2021
at 9:41 AM
6-A-21-SP
Lynda
37931
6-A-21-SP
Lynda (37931), May 20, 2021 at 2:48 PM
Traffic is already very bad on Ball Camp Pike and will get worse with the construction of the Schaad Road extension. The nearby existing intersections are already dangerous to pull out of. Rezoning this plot and the adjoining plot will result in making an already dangerous situation worse and I am afraid will result in bodily injury to someone or worse.
May 20, 2021
at 2:48 PM
3-SB-21-C
Phillip
3-SB-21-C
Phillip May 24, 2021 at 2:09 PM
Thank you for your willingness to serve Knoxville and Knox County through your role on the planning commission! I am writing today in support of the proposed Innsbruck Farms development located in East Knox County off of Ruggles Ferry Pike.

I ask that you consider the drastic need and long-term benefits to Knox County from this project. In order to support a growing city/county and future job growth, there has to be large housing developments of all kinds (rural, suburban, urban, downtown, etc.) to sustain our future. All across the United States, housing demand is at an all time high. At the time of this email, there are only 361 active real estate listings for homes in all of Knox County. Development projects like this are crucial to combat the large housing need.

I have been on both sides of the aisle with development, as a concerned resident and as a property owner working to develop properties. I understand not wanting to see an area change or get developed, but individuals have to realize that it is only a matter of time before this currently underdeveloped part of our county starts receiving more and more proposed residential and commercial developments.

I have repeatedly heard the argument of the concerns of increased traffic on the adjoining roads surrounding this property and the associated safety. Sure some of the smaller roads will need widening and improvements, but how often is this not an issue with a new development. I am on Ruggles Ferry Pike often, which I feel can safely accommodate the increased traffic from this neighborhood at its peak. Oftentimes when driving on Ruggles Ferry Pike, you will only meet one or two cars on this long 6 mile road. In my opinion, this road is currently underutilized, considering the size and quality of this road.

Thank you for taking the time to read my email. I ask that you support this needed development project in Knox County.
May 24, 2021
at 2:09 PM
3-SB-21-C
Marian
37924
3-SB-21-C
Marian (37924), May 24, 2021 at 9:01 PM
Regarding the Innsbruck Farms proposed development:

I am emphatically Opposed to the amount of houses for this development!!!

I feel it would have a very negative impact on our community with regards to traffic, safety, environmental issues as well as diminishing the ‘rural living’ of so many who have enjoyed this area for years!!
May 24, 2021
at 9:01 PM
3-SB-21-C
Tesha
37924
3-SB-21-C
Tesha (37924), May 24, 2021 at 9:12 PM
I’m against this development 100%. I’m concerned about the safety with adding that many houses to an already busy road. I don’t think our roads, schools or community would be able to grow that much that fast. Please don’t allow this to pass. I love my community as it is and very concerned with the changes that could come from this very large subdivision.
May 24, 2021
at 9:12 PM
3-SB-21-C
VANESSA
37924
3-SB-21-C
VANESSA (37924), May 24, 2021 at 10:47 PM
My family has personally owned property on Ruggles Ferry since the turn of the century and before. My ancestors operated a small store as well as a dairy farm. As of this date, my husband and I own 35 acres on Ruggles Ferry. We have no intention of developing the property. It's history. We live in a subdivision in north Knoxville, that was sadly, once a vibrant farm. Enough is enough! There is no "planning" to this. Ruggles Ferry Rd is no where near prepared for the amount of the traffic that a subdivision of this size would bring. It's ridiculous! There is not even a decent grocery store in the area! The Food City on Ashville Hwy can in no way handle the volume of customers that a subdivision of that size would bring. Not to mention the size of the schools in the area. Unfortunately, it's all about money and greed. It was heartbreaking enough when I watched the Blake Farm become the golf course, but as it developed-I came to terms with it-beautiful houses, estate size lots and the golf course still has a "rural" feel/look to it. Fine-develop it to a degree-but 482 homes??!! No one in this area wants Ruggles Ferry/East Knox County to become the next Hardin Valley! Developers have been allowed to continue to develop beautiful farm property for urban sprawl with no regard to infrastructure! This is beautiful property backing up to the Holston River! Please save our peaceful community!
May 24, 2021
at 10:47 PM
3-SB-21-C
Larry
37924
3-SB-21-C
Larry (37924), May 24, 2021 at 11:09 PM
The development of more than 400+ Homesites is not what our community needs. Currently, we suffer from poor service from KUB Electrical infrastructure. The approving committee needs to base their vote on the lack of infrastructure to support a development of this size. Many of the roads are narrow and are already strained during the golf season with traffic not yielding to proper traffic laws such as high speeds and passing along several long stretches with adjacent roads. For the best interest of North Ruggles Ferry Pike and its outlining roads, we would best benefit from fewer homes with 1 Acre lots to preserve the appearance of the rural area feel. We have enough poorly approved developments in Knox County with bottlenecks of getting to main roads.... A planning commission should be planning ahead prior to any approval of large development.
May 24, 2021
at 11:09 PM
6-A-21-SP
Tony
37931
6-A-21-SP
Tony (37931), May 24, 2021 at 11:18 PM
Please see attachment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210524231849.pdf
May 24, 2021
at 11:18 PM
6-A-21-SP
DAVID
37931
6-A-21-SP
DAVID (37931), May 26, 2021 at 11:54 PM
The current planned zoning change for this area does not appear to be one that would benefit the community. The area is located on Ball Camp Pike which is already extremely congested with traffic flow, to only increase with the Shaad Rd extension project. The area in recent weeks has seen deadly motor vehicle accidents due to the level of congestion at Hitching Post and Daybreak Drive, along with the traffic that flows off of Middlebrook Pk. as well as traffic from Lovel Road. While I am sure the current land owner is interested in finding some use for the parcel of land that is currently not useable for any other purpose and can't be sold likely due to the Shaad Rd extension plan. I see no benefit. The area is already close to many restaurants and the hope of possible gaining business from either the local soccer crowd or the county park were concession are sold for the purpose of benefitting the youth sports leagues there seems like a poor choice of showing community support. I strongly urge the County Commission the reject the request for rezoning of this location.
May 26, 2021
at 11:54 PM
3-SB-21-C
William and Shirley
3-SB-21-C
William and Shirley May 30, 2021 at 12:38 PM
Twenty-one years ago we left the congestion and confines of a west Knox suburb to enjoy our haven on Ellijay Way. We have never missed the amenities of shopping, restaurants or entertainment venues because our current lifestyle fulfills our desires.

We live on small acreage where quiet prevails. In the morning, we listen to the calls of turkey. In the dark of night, we hear the mournful cry of coyotes. Big open skies provide a show of meteor showers, rainbows and constellations. The Holston River is our backyard where waterfowl and recreationist enjoy clean waters. We see beauty in hay bales nestled in open fields. Cattle graze openly in meadows. Agriculture is evident here.

The density of the Innsbruck Farms development will alter what we have protected and valued. We ask for oversight in protecting the waterway from pollution from the development of lawns. Eagles are making a comeback and a heron rookery exists a short distance away.

We ask for protection from noise and light pollution.

A serious traffic plan must be developed to safely control the four thousand cars that will be clogging our roadways.

The Carter Schools must be awarded building funds to handle the influx of students.

The destruction of wildlife habitat will permanently destroy how we coexist with valued wildlife.

We purposely chose this area of the county because it is not suburbia. That is what we left behind. Please help us protect what we love.
May 30, 2021
at 12:38 PM
6-I-21-UR
Robert
37931
6-I-21-UR
Robert (37931), June 3, 2021 at 10:51 AM
Please deny this request for additional self-storage. This developer is already building a massive 3-story indoor self-storage facility with plenty of additional outdoor parking areas in the adjacent lot, refer to 6-D-19-UR. Please consider a better use for this land between Beaver Ridge and Oak Ridge Highway.
June 3, 2021
at 10:51 AM
6-A-21-SP
Area Petition
37931
6-A-21-SP
Area Petition (37931), June 7, 2021 at 1:13 PM
Please see attached letter and signatures of 34 residents in the immediate area that oppose the rezoning of this property.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210607131302.pdf
June 7, 2021
at 1:13 PM
6-B-21-RZ
Karla
N/A
6-B-21-RZ
Karla (N/A), June 9, 2021 at 4:13 PM
Attached is a petition in favor of the requested rezoning.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210609161313.pdf
June 9, 2021
at 4:13 PM
6-B-21-RZ
Karla
37931
6-B-21-RZ
Karla (37931), June 9, 2021 at 4:30 PM
Attached is a Facebook post showing those in favor of the project.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210609163012.pdf
June 9, 2021
at 4:30 PM
3-SB-21-C
Susan
37871
3-SB-21-C
Susan (37871), June 14, 2021 at 5:39 PM
Please consider this an addendum to an earlier message I sent in opposition to the Innsbruck Farms proposal as submitted. This morning (6/14/2021) in daylight, many oppositional signs displayed in neighbors' yards in our community, were removed by some unknown individual(s). This kind of behavior is just as shocking and disappointing as when it occurs during election seasons. While it is likely that we will never know where responsibility may lie, or if it was a poorly hatched prank, the reality is only signs related to the proposed subdivision were targeted. This juvenile conduct has no real bearing on the decisions you make regarding this proposal, but I feel COMPELLED to emphasize our community is NOT resistant to responsible development that will enhance all of the Ruggles Ferry area, and preserve the safety and serenity we enjoy and would like to share with others. (High density housing and choking traffic is inconsistent with responsible.) It is alarming to consider that civil discourse might be discounted when all we hope for is what will be best for our community and Knox County. An ideal outcome for the Ruggles Ferry community would be for Innsbruck Farms to be a model for future development in Knox County and elsewhere.
June 14, 2021
at 5:39 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Debbie
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Debbie (37920), June 16, 2021 at 12:13 PM
I am very opposed to this type of development in our neighborhood. The traffic at this intersection is already terrible on a good day. As TDOT has not finished the Alcoa Highway project, this will greatly increase the risk and likelihood for more crashes in the area. At present, Maloney Road is not truly able to handle the traffic increase. Additionally, the noise will increase from increased car traffic on an already over saturated road.
June 16, 2021
at 12:13 PM
7-B-21-RZ
Melinda
37934
7-B-21-RZ
Melinda (37934), June 16, 2021 at 3:24 PM
I am a resident/home owner in the Parkgate/Western Hills subdivision. I am concerned about the lots being rezoned for commercial OB due to them being connected to a residential neighborhood. Myself and others in the neighborhood have concerns about increased through traffic on Parkgate Lane, Increased traffic accidents including cars and children/walkers. Increased crime, especially any sort of medical building (pain clinic, doctors office, more noise, trash and litter. Considering these lots are located within the neighborhood, we have questions regarding what type of business will be added and more importantly where will the entrance or exit be located? I spoke with Lin (property owner on June 15th and he said he planned on building houses on those lots. I'm not sure if he told me that because I'm a concerned resident or because that's his true intentions. Myself and several other neighbors will try to attend the July 8th meeting to get answers to our questions. We welcome the idea of more homes as there is already a shortage, but we are concerned about any business that would be located within our subdivision as this isn't something that would be appealing to any buyers and isn't customary to be located within a residential area.
June 16, 2021
at 3:24 PM
7-B-21-RZ
Earl
37934
7-B-21-RZ
Earl (37934), June 18, 2021 at 2:24 PM
I have concerns over this rezoning request. Unless access to Parkgate Ln is blocked and a privacy wall put up and a new entrance is established from the roundabout at the Farlow Dr / Kingston Pk traffic light, I believe the requested parcel of land should only be rezoned to single family residential like the entirety of the properties on Parkgate Ln. If access to this property is allowed from the Parkgate Ln road front, any commercial interest within the OB designation would lead to a significant spike in non-neighborhood through traffic on a narrow road that has on-road parking, leading to more accidents (walking the neighborhood would become a lot more dangerous). Depending on what business is desired, it could also lead to an increase in theft/break-ins, and potentially violent crime (if anything medical is added, drug seekers walking through the neighborhood will go from zero to too many).

Given the location of the neighborhood, the easements for power lines going through / next to the parcel(s) in question, it should be restricted to single family housing or a park.
June 18, 2021
at 2:24 PM
7-D-21-SP
James
37920
7-D-21-SP
James (37920), June 22, 2021 at 9:25 PM
Property owner off Maloney Rd. since 1976. I purchased this property specifically to live in the county to avoid high city taxes and in an area zoned for single family dwelling. I am in opposition to any rezoning of the Maloney Rd. area. In my opinion, rezoning will forever change our quite community from a rural to inner city environment. Maloney Road traffic increased significantly with the building of Sevier Heights church. An apartment complex will bring additional traffic making it extremely difficult for local residents to leave and enter their homes. In addition, Mount Olive School, (a historic site) cannot handle the possible overload of students and may require busing to Boney Kate and other area locations. We experience a natural run-off from heavy rains that flood my neighbor's driveway joining the back side of my property from Jonathan Way. The water naturally flows South to the coulter sack and turns along side my property to Maloney Road where it continues through a small culvert underneath Maloney, eventually dumping into Ft. Loudon lake. The culvert will not handle heavy rains and at times the water level will rise to approximately 6 ft. crossing my drive way entrance from Maloney Road. I can continue with many more reasons to oppose this project are any other project that will change the graphics of our neighbor. For the sake of gravity, I will stop here.
June 22, 2021
at 9:25 PM
7-C-21-PA
Carol
37920
7-C-21-PA
Carol (37920), June 23, 2021 at 9:19 AM
67 people were at the meeting at Mt. Olive Church to oppose construction of. 200-300 apt. Unit building. Maloney Rd can’t handle traffic. One lane train underpass at the other end of Maloney gets extremely backed up certain times of day already with current traffic. KAT buses were mentioned several times which can bring any type person from any part of town to a residential and currently safe neighborhood.
June 23, 2021
at 9:19 AM
7-A-21-RZ
Alex
37918
7-A-21-RZ
Alex (37918), June 23, 2021 at 1:03 PM
The increase in traffic would cause alot of discourse for students walking to and from school and general neighborhood traffic. This plan would cause a lot of discourse for a nice, quiet neighborhood. Keep the current zoning regulations in place.
June 23, 2021
at 1:03 PM
7-A-21-RZ
Alex
37918
7-A-21-RZ
Alex (37918), June 23, 2021 at 1:03 PM
The increase in traffic would cause alot of discourse for students walking to and from school and general neighborhood traffic. This plan would cause a lot of discourse for a nice, quiet neighborhood. Keep the current zoning regulations in place.
June 23, 2021
at 1:03 PM
7-A-21-RZ
Kyle
37918
7-A-21-RZ
Kyle (37918), June 23, 2021 at 3:58 PM
The development of medium density residential units in this area, which already experiences inordinate amounts of vehicle traffic, would greatly decrease the safety and quality of life for existing residents, most notably the surrounding properties on Kingwood Rd, Holbrook Dr, and Balsam Dr. Rezoning will prove to have detrimental effects to neighborhood property values, and will permanently alter the historic charm and character of Fountain City, one of Knoxville's oldest and proudest communities. 
For years, this empty lot has served the neighborhood as both a drop point for brush pickup and general recreation. Ideally, it will remain a site for public recreation/use.
June 23, 2021
at 3:58 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Austin
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Austin (37932), June 23, 2021 at 7:09 PM
PR zoning is not appropriate given the density on the submitted form. At 1 unit/AC, and given that the majority of the land is well within the pitch of the hillside protection zone a zoning of an exclusive residential (RAE) zone would be the most applicable.

A density of 1 unit/AC is not possible unless the hillside protection is removed. The development of this property should mirror the restrictions of the Black Forest subdivision (zoned PR
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210623190910.pdf
June 23, 2021
at 7:09 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Zach
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Zach (37932), June 24, 2021 at 11:31 AM
PR zoning is not appropriate given the available land on the submitted form. At 1 unit per acre, and given that the majority of the land is well out on the pitch of the hillside protection zone a zoning of an exclusive residential (RAE) zone would be the most applicable.

A density of 1 unit/AC is not possible unless the hillside protection is removed. The development of this property should mirror the restrictions of the Black Forest subdivision (zoned PR) which is right next to this property.
June 24, 2021
at 11:31 AM
7-D-21-SP
Sharon
37920
7-D-21-SP
Sharon (37920), June 24, 2021 at 6:20 PM
I looked at the proposed drawing for the 294 units on Maloney Road here in South Knoxville, and am more than concerned at the possible impact to our zoned elementary school, Mount Olive. We have not yet begun to feel the effects of the subdivision on Maryville Pike (across from Dara's Garden) and cannot imagine what this proposed housing will do to our school's population. Additionally in our zone, have new houses being build off of Belt Road, in two different locations. We understand that rezoning will take place soon to help the overcrowding in some of our area schools (Bonny Kate literally has portable classrooms!) and this proposal for 294 units will house untold numbers of people who will further add to our school's population. We cannot see this proposal as a plus to our community and request that before your commission proceeds further, you go to the proposed location and note the impact that building so many units will have on the surrounding area and our local school, Mount Olive Elementary.
June 24, 2021
at 6:20 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Thomas
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Thomas (37932), June 25, 2021 at 12:19 PM
As a Black Forest homeowner west of this proposed development, I encourage you to vote against this request for the following reasons:
1. Water pressure/flow is already low for our community, requiring a pumping station on the east end of our development. How will this be handled to not impact our water pressure?
2. Black Road is already too narrow and has a significant blind spot on a hill at the west end with a large drop-off, and the increased traffic (during construction and afterward) will only increase the problem.
3. Constant speeding on this straight away, essentially unpatrolled road is already dangerous for the many families in our community which use the sidewalk daily, and the increased traffic (during construction and afterward) will make this worse.
June 25, 2021
at 12:19 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Regis
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Regis (37932), June 25, 2021 at 2:25 PM
As a resident of Black Rd, I ask you to vote against this request. Black Road is already too narrow and doesn't allow for safe traffic flow. In several locations, the road is not even wide enough for two pick-up trucks to pass at the same time. Traffic is also getting to dangerous levels, as many drivers use Black Rd as an alternative to the interstate and drive at very high speeds. Our neighbor's dog was run over by a speeding car two years ago. As mentioned by other commenters, the proposed zoning will also have environmental impacts: the removal of all the trees to allow 6 units to be constructed, as would be required to put 6 units on a 6-acre parcel would destroy the beauty of the ridge, devastate the water quality of Hickory Creek at the base of the hill and go against the existing zoning and protections that were placed on the development of the neighboring Black Forest subdivision.
June 25, 2021
at 2:25 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Ron
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Ron (37920), June 26, 2021 at 12:07 PM
I am vehemently opposed to rezoning these parcels for multi-family development. This area is exclusively single family, low density housing and should remain as such. It does not have the infrastructure such as roads, drainage, schools, gas stations, grocery stores, etc to support a development of this size. There are numerous options for building an apartment complex of this size within areas currently zoned for this type of development. The request to redone these parcels to allow construction of a development that is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhoods should be denied
June 26, 2021
at 12:07 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Sarah
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Sarah (37920), June 26, 2021 at 12:18 PM
The apartments proposed for building on Maloney Rd would take away a lot of green space and impact the environment in an extremely negative way. There are already numerous apartment complexes that have been built on chapman highway and cumberland avenue to accommodate people and families. The apartments would also make it very unsafe for those people who live on Maloney Rd and nearby neighborhoods due to the increase in traffic and increase in people in that area. It would increase the traffic and pollution on Maloney Rd, Belt Rd, and in Martha Washington Heights. Many people living close together such as in apartment complexes leads to an increase in the noise and crime rate.
June 26, 2021
at 12:18 PM
7-A-21-RZ
Jennifer
37918
7-A-21-RZ
Jennifer (37918), June 26, 2021 at 1:47 PM
Please prioritize communities and residents over real estate developers!! Kingwood road is already a busy street and the neighborhood will suffer if there are multi-family residences built at this address. Knoxville is a large city but its most successful neighborhoods have a small town atmosphere. Please allow the charm and community-centered nature of historic Fountain City to remain intact by not rezoning this parcel of land.
June 26, 2021
at 1:47 PM
7-C-21-PA
Denise
37920
7-C-21-PA
Denise (37920), June 26, 2021 at 2:24 PM
I oppose the rezoning of this property from single family to multi family use. The streets in the area are not design to accommodate the volume of traffic this apartment complex will generate. This change will so have a negative impact on the property values of the single family homes in the area. I have concerns about the negative impact an apartment complex of the proposed size would negatively impact quality office for current home owners because of noise pollution, increased crime, light pollution, and water runoff. I respectfully request the board vote against this re-zoning request.
June 26, 2021
at 2:24 PM
7-C-21-PA
Raquel
37920
7-C-21-PA
Raquel (37920), June 27, 2021 at 9:32 AM
I oppose the building of the 200-300 unit apartment complex on Maloney Rd and Alcoa Hwy. From past experience a large apartment complex brings crime to the neighborhood. The traffic would be unbearable as Maloney Road is narrow and traffic would be backed up trying to enter and exit from Alcoa Hwy.

Please do not let Money and revenue influence your vote for this project to move forward. PLEASE SAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD and VOTE NO.
June 27, 2021
at 9:32 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Carol
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Carol (37920), June 27, 2021 at 10:38 AM
The property across Maloney Rd. from me floods with heavy rain now! If there are 10 acres of concrete, pavement, buildings uphill from this area, 5 homes driveways will be flooded and impossible to get out. This has happened already. Feb. 2019 flooding caused this property across from me to look like a lake! The house sits way back. If this development proceeds, Maloney Road will flood as well The neighbors over there could not get out of their driveways then.I am opposed to changing the sector plan for many reasons, but flooding is critical and homeowners who have maintained their properties for many years will have a hardship that should not be taken lightly!
June 27, 2021
at 10:38 AM
7-C-21-PA
Koleman
37865
7-C-21-PA
Koleman (37865), June 27, 2021 at 6:20 PM
Building these apartments will cripple a thriving neighborhood. You are trying to shove community living on family people that bought the land they bought to have a peace of mind knowing they didn’t have 600 other people living around them. I strongly urge that you reconsider this and do not go forward with a plan that would inevitably destroy this community. Where many have live for 50-60 years.
June 27, 2021
at 6:20 PM
7-C-21-PA
Koleman
37865
7-C-21-PA
Koleman (37865), June 27, 2021 at 6:22 PM
This is a single family dwelling neighborhood you can not rezone this as multi-family dwelling this land is our land. Family land not land for you to line your pockets full of money. This is a shame your trying to ruin this great area of Knoxville
June 27, 2021
at 6:22 PM
7-C-21-PA
Karli
37865
7-C-21-PA
Karli (37865), June 27, 2021 at 6:32 PM
Maloney road is a part of a single family living. This area is sacred to many family’s in this community. My grandparents own a property that would back up to the new development. If this were to take place it would ruin the environment that we hoped to raise our kids and our kids, kids. Also if you make this big development it will only increase the crime rate in the area and along with the traffic. Now that Sevier Heights has grown the traffic is insane. It’s dangerous just pulling out of our drive ways now and that’s with our 200-300 apartments going in. People don’t reason the amount of wildlife that’s crosses through that 10 acres. There’s deer, foxes, raccoons, and even coyotes. Also keep in mind there is a flooding issue that does occur in the area. I hope you reconsider how you are effecting the surround single family homes that’s have been in family’s for generations.
June 27, 2021
at 6:32 PM
7-B-21-RZ
Neil
37934
7-B-21-RZ
Neil (37934), June 27, 2021 at 7:00 PM
I have lived in this residential neighborhood since April 2006. I have raised my children here and there are still many young children and families that walk, ride and play on this street. I do not know what the Planning Commission's outcome will be on this hearing. I just ask that you take in consideration that this is a neighborhood that has been what I have considered a place where the children and families could feel safe allowing them to play and enjoy there neighborhood street. If the the Planning Commission does approve the property for commercial building that they do not allow the access point to be connected to our residential road of Parkgate Lane.
June 27, 2021
at 7:00 PM
7-C-21-PA
Hillary
37920
7-C-21-PA
Hillary (37920), June 27, 2021 at 9:51 PM
Please don't build apartments here; Maloney is already a nightmare to exit on/off Alcoa on Sundays (you can be stuck waiting in line for more than hour) secondary to the church on Maloney. I can only imagine if there was emergency traffic during that time as well. This is a residential/country neighborhood that does not have the infrastructure to support more people or traffic (there are no sidewalks, etc)
June 27, 2021
at 9:51 PM
7-D-21-SP
Hillary
37920
7-D-21-SP
Hillary (37920), June 27, 2021 at 9:54 PM
This is an older neighborhood that can not support an influx of apartments. We live here because we enjoy a country/rural feel. We do not need more traffic on small, narrow streets.
June 27, 2021
at 9:54 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Robert
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Robert (37920), June 27, 2021 at 10:52 PM
I feel that the approval of the re-zoning will set the stage for the multi-family project to proceed into detailed design and thus allow the area residents an opportunity to offer suggestions to the developer to promote a sensitive and well designed project. The site is ideal for multi-family due to its adjacency to Alcoa Highway with quick on and off thus minimizing traffic intrusion on the neighboring communities.

Our existing commercial establishments have been devastated by the road construction along Alcoa Highway and we need more residents in the area to entice business re-development to provide neighborhood needs. I attended the developer meeting at Mount Olive Church and am confident in the quality of the project proposed and feel it would be an asset to our neighborhoods.
June 27, 2021
at 10:52 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Kairav
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Kairav (37932), June 28, 2021 at 9:08 AM
As a Black Forest homeowner west of this proposed development, I encourage you to vote against this request for the following reasons:

1. Water pressure/flow is already low for our community, requiring a pumping station on the east end of our development. How will this be handled to not impact our water pressure?

2. Black Road is already too narrow and has a significant blind spot on a hill at the west end with a large drop-off, and the increased traffic (during construction and afterward) will only increase the problem.

3. Constant speeding on this straight away, essentially unpatrolled road is already dangerous for the many families in our community which use the sidewalk daily, and the increased traffic (during construction and afterward) will make this worse.
June 28, 2021
at 9:08 AM
7-I-21-RZ
Jennifer
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Jennifer (37932), June 28, 2021 at 12:56 PM
I am a Black Forest homeowner. This new proposed development will be East of my neighborhood. I request that you vote against this proposed development for the following reasons:

1. Black Road issues:
-Additional resident traffic along this unpatrolled road will increase the already-present danger to the families in our community who use the sidewalks. There are kids who ride bikes and families who walk along this road. There is already constant speeding along this roadway. Increased traffic will make the issue worse.

-Black Road is a narrow road with blind corners. Construction equipment (along with the increased traffic after construction is complete) will compound this risk.

2. Water pressure issues:
-Water pressure is already very low for our neighborhood. There is already a pumping station required on the East end of our development. I am concerned additional development would cause additional problems, unless there is a proposed solution to remedy this.
June 28, 2021
at 12:56 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Carol
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Carol (37920), June 28, 2021 at 1:09 PM
This area is exclusively single family low density housing. It does not have the infrastructure such as roads, drainage, schools, etc. to support a development of this size. There are numerous options for building apartments of this size in areas already zoned for multi family dwellings. The request to rezone these parcels to allow construction of a development that is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood should be denied!
June 28, 2021
at 1:09 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Leslie
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Leslie (37932), June 28, 2021 at 1:55 PM
I live on Black Rd just west of this planned development. I have concerns about how the water supply and water pressure issues will be addressed. We are currently restricted from watering during peak hours due to aging water supply equipment which would cost millions of dollars to replace. Those millions of dollars would come from an increase in the rates of current residents.

I also feel that Black Road is a narrow, dangerous road already. No speed limits are posted or enforced. Adding new housing will create more traffic and more issues for community residents using the road and sidewalks.
June 28, 2021
at 1:55 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Aaron
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Aaron (37932), June 28, 2021 at 2:01 PM
As a Black Forest homeowner west of this proposed development, I encourage you to vote against this request for the following reasons:
1. Water pressure/flow is already low for our community, requiring a pumping station on the east end of our development. How will this be handled to not impact our water pressure?
2. Black Road is already too narrow and has a significant blind spot on a hill at the west end with a large drop-off, and the increased traffic (during construction and afterward) will only increase the problem.
3. Constant speeding on this straight away, essentially unpatrolled road is already dangerous for the many families in our community which use the sidewalk daily, and the increased traffic (during construction and afterward) will make this worse. I cannot put enough emphasis on reason #3. We have several families with young kids and it is so dangerous for them to play in the driveway as so many motorist drive way over the posted speed limit all day, every single day. The safety of our children should be everyones number one concern.
June 28, 2021
at 2:01 PM
7-I-21-RZ
Jennifer
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Jennifer (37932), June 28, 2021 at 3:48 PM
I am a Black Forest homeowner. This new proposed development will be East of my neighborhood. I request that you vote against this proposed development for the following reasons: 1. Black Road issues: -Additional resident traffic along this unpatrolled road will increase the already-present danger to the families in our community who use the sidewalks. There are kids who ride bikes and families who walk along this road. There is already constant speeding along this roadway. Increased traffic will make the issue worse. -Black Road is a narrow road with blind corners. Construction equipment (along with the increased traffic after construction is complete) will compound this risk. 2. Water pressure issues: -Water pressure is already very low for our neighborhood. There is already a pumping station required on the East end of our development. I am concerned additional development would cause additional problems, unless there is a proposed solution to remedy this.
June 28, 2021
at 3:48 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Penny
920
7-H-21-RZ
Penny (920), June 29, 2021 at 12:11 AM
I strongly oppose the rezoning of the properties on Maloney Road to multi family designation.

The character of this quiet residential area will be negatively changed if this rezoning occurs. This will lead to more people, traffic, safety issues, and environmental concerns. The development of a large apartment complex will destroy acres of large trees, cause light and noise pollution along with a negative storm water impact. Access to Mount Olive Elementary School from the proposed apartment location is very limited due to the narrow railroad tunnel.

This area can not support a large apartment complex in this particular location and rezoning will set a precedent for the limited available property along Alcoa Highway.
June 29, 2021
at 12:11 AM
7-I-21-RZ
R
11893
7-I-21-RZ
R (11893), June 29, 2021 at 7:09 AM
I'm a homeowner in the Black Forest community. I am opposed to this proposed subdivision project (Z-1-21-RZ). My observations in the 3 years since I've resided there are more based on traffic flow and road usage:
This is a dangerous road as is.
The amount of non local traffic that uses this road as a cut through is alarming. Not to mention the constant speeding that is now part of the norm.
This is a narrow, hilly and curvy dangerous road. The local residents that walk the street with their young children/ animals has increased substantially since Black Forest has finished. I do not believe this is in the best interest of the Black Forest neighborhood.
June 29, 2021
at 7:09 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Gene
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Gene (37920), June 29, 2021 at 9:42 AM
Attached is my support letter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210629094206.pdf
June 29, 2021
at 9:42 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Andy
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Andy (37920), June 29, 2021 at 10:27 AM
Maloney road is a peaceful and quiet established wooded neighborhood that I feel would be negatively impacted by a sprawling large apartment complex. There are 4 nearly empty shopping centers nearby along Alcoa Highway that would be perfect for this type of situation. In fact something like this was recently built on Chapman highway adjacent to the Post Office. Maloney road should remain single family residential.
My main concern is losing all of the trees in the neighborhood. I can actually feel the difference in temperature when I drive from my house on Maloney Road onto Alcoa Highways due to the shade we have. It would be a tragic shame to lose that when there are so many other areas in bad need of development. Please vote NO on rezoning Maloney Road. If you feel like it must proceed, I would request that you require at least 50% of the wooded area to remain wooded. It seems like many developers prefer to remove every tree within a property, and this would leave the neighbors with no screening from the complex.
June 29, 2021
at 10:27 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Leah
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Leah (37920), June 29, 2021 at 10:36 AM
As a long time resident of a nearby neighborhood, I do not wish to see an apartment complex come into our peaceful residential area.
June 29, 2021
at 10:36 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Kathy
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Kathy (37920), June 29, 2021 at 12:13 PM
My letter is attached below
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210629121344.pdf
June 29, 2021
at 12:13 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Dolores
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Dolores (37920), June 29, 2021 at 1:59 PM
An apartment complex on Maloney Road would be a huge invasion into a single family neighborhood both along Maloney Road and surrounding neighborhoods. Apartments in this area would add nothing but problems for all who reside here (traffic, noise, loss of trees and privacy to name a few). If HUD should ever become involved with the rental, it could cause property values to drop. This area has no need for an apartment complex and it would be better in an area where zoning is already multi-family. As a resident of this area, I object to this development and I strongly urge you to vote against rezoning the property in question.
June 29, 2021
at 1:59 PM
7-C-21-PA
Dawn
37920
7-C-21-PA
Dawn (37920), June 29, 2021 at 4:48 PM
I'm a Lakemoor Hills resident and OPPOSE the proposed 200-300 unit multifamily apartment complex. My concerns are crime, decreased property values, desecration of natural beauty in exchange for an ugly concrete jungle, traffic congestion, increased potential for traffic accidents, no control over rent costs and quality of tenants, light pollution, run-off water, storm drainage. I understand higher population density increases the potential for local business investment; however, the negatives of the proposed development greatly outweigh the minor inconveniences of having to drive a bit farther for gas and groceries. I would expect more local business investment will or won't come in the future based on roadwork and market. We don't need to add a huge number of people. An apartment complex would be a huge negative for this highly desirable area.
June 29, 2021
at 4:48 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Shari
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Shari (37920), June 29, 2021 at 8:04 PM
I want to voice my oppositions to the rezoning of this area on Maloney Rd to multi family dwelling for an apartment complex . This type of development will have a negative change to the dynamics of this area. This is a quiet pleasant area. There will be so much more traffic on the narrow backroads and create backups at the one lane underpass. These type of complexes tend to bring in crime to the area. And, we feel the home values will be lowered due to the apartments. Please reconsider approving this development.
June 29, 2021
at 8:04 PM
7-C-21-PA
Reed
37920
7-C-21-PA
Reed (37920), June 30, 2021 at 10:50 AM
I own and reside at 3116 Maloney Road, and I am vehemently OPPOSED to this rezoning request. I am the closest residential neighbor to the proposed development, and only the two-lane width of Maloney Road separates my property from the proposed apartment complex property. I oppose this rezoning primarily because the design of the complex shows TWO points of entry and exit, BOTH of which enter and exit not onto Alcoa Highway, but directly onto Maloney Road opposite the rear entrances for Sevier Heights Baptist Church and my residence. Dominion Group's design proposes a total of 11 three-story structures which will be strikingly out of character with the architecture of this residential neighborhood. Current traffic from Sevier Heights' M-F childcare, sports and other non-Sunday programs (not to mention Sunday traffic) bottleneck the roundabouts morning and evening, and as MPC members no doubt are aware, the other end of this segment of Maloney Road terminates near a one-lane underpass at Maryville Pike just shy of Mt. Olive School and its attendant traffic. Maloney Road is a quiet, winding, unimproved two-lane county residential road. Already, we are seeing increased cut-through to Alcoa Highway from the new Sevier Meadows residential development. Please perform due diligence before you vote and DRIVE this segment of Maloney Road M-F between 7-8 a.m. or 5-6 p.m., or on Sunday at noon, then respectfully vote NO on this rezoning request.
June 30, 2021
at 10:50 AM
7-C-21-PA
Christy
37920
7-C-21-PA
Christy (37920), June 30, 2021 at 3:52 PM
I am vehemently opposed to the rezoning and apartment plan recently proposed. My entire letter is attached. Please find the excerpt below regarding the Knox County School PRZ:

Additionally, the apartment complex will lay within Knox County School Transportation's "Parental Responsibility Zone" (PRZ), which means that any child who is zoned for Mount Olive will have to be driven to the school by their respective parents. This means an estimated 175+ cars going through the one lane tunnel FOUR times a day (to/from drop-off and then to/from pick-up). That is a nightmare, and will either cause KCS Transportation to amend their rules, which will set a precedent for the rest of the county, OR the County will have to completely redo Maloney Road, and the train tunnel, causing further misery and delays for community residents as well as the railroad, as well as the destruction of an old and historic rail tunnel, recently painted with a mural to reflect the school and community. (It should also be pointed out that the tunnel's clearance is too low for a school bus to pass through.....)

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210630155211.pdf
June 30, 2021
at 3:52 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Kara
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Kara (37920), June 30, 2021 at 5:38 PM
The Maloney Road apartment complex should NOT be approved. The roads are narrow and windy, we also have a 1 lane underpass that could not withstand this extra traffic. Traffic is bad enough when Sevier Heights services let out 2x on Sundays and on Wednesday evenings. It would even back up traffic at Maloney and Maryville Pike, it's hard enough to turn left there now as it is during rush hour and Mount Olive elementary school starting and dismissal times. Plus there are 2 entrances and exits from this proposed complex and both exit on Maloney Rd none on Alcoa Hwy, this will congest our round about even more. What is the draw to this area for the developer? To ruin our neighborhoods just to line his greedy pockets? Anyone voting yes for this should be ashamed of themselves. Our area is a quiet, rural area with beautiful land and trees and families that have lived there for generations and we do NOT want this complex in our community.
June 30, 2021
at 5:38 PM
7-C-21-PA
Sharon
37920
7-C-21-PA
Sharon (37920), June 30, 2021 at 8:30 PM
After my initial comment, I looked at the topographical map of this proposed development. The trees behind the houses serve a very important function: they mop up the water that cascades from the houses in Rolling Hills during some of the storms we have been experiencing. Very close to the proposed development is a bathymetric feature: a channel. I googled "channel" and got the following: "Channel heads are often associated with colluvium, hollows and landslides. Overland flows (as those that come from Rolling Hills) converge in topographical depressions where channel initiation begins." This development could cause a lot of problems for current Maloney Road residents and long term problems for the builders.
June 30, 2021
at 8:30 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Linda
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Linda (37920), July 1, 2021 at 4:09 PM
The apartment complex project has been presented as high quality construction targeted to medium income workers. Proposed landscaping will act as a sound and visual buffer between it and other properties. It sounds like a place I would like to live in should I decide to move from my home which is near by. Development is inevitable along this nearly completed section of Alcoa Highway. One that owners of blighted properties and parcels waiting for an end to road construction have been waiting for. Some traffic from the apartments will use roads on adjacent neighborhoods occasionally, but outgoing traffic will use the most convenient and direct route - Alcoa Highway. As a nearby neighbor I find the developer’s interest in bus service attractive because I would use it. I’m not opposed to this project at all. It could encourage more high end and attractive development in the area.
July 1, 2021
at 4:09 PM
7-D-21-SP
Michael
38506
7-D-21-SP
Michael (38506), July 1, 2021 at 5:27 PM
I am opposed to apartment developments in the area. The roads are very narrow and curvy and we have people and families that walk regularly in the area. It is a peaceful area and a large population spike would make it a very different place. The zoned area should stay as single family dwellings.
July 1, 2021
at 5:27 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Mike
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Mike (37920), July 1, 2021 at 10:09 PM
Please see attachment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210701220946.pdf
July 1, 2021
at 10:09 PM
7-A-21-UR
James (Jim)
37938
7-A-21-UR
James (Jim) (37938), July 2, 2021 at 9:01 AM
Please see attached PDF document.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210702090108.pdf
July 2, 2021
at 9:01 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Kandace
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Kandace (37920), July 2, 2021 at 9:11 AM
I Highly oppose this rezoning...We all live in a neighborhood that pretty much every one knows each other
This will cause crime, destruction of the roads and landscape of the surrounding areas..
We did not move into the city limits for a reason...
I have seen this slimy way of doing business in Charlotte and Atlanta and all it does is destroy the area .
Do Not Destroy Our County for your Greed......Do Not Turn Knox County into an Atlanta and/or a Charlotte..
July 2, 2021
at 9:11 AM
7-A-21-RZ
Carlene
37918
7-A-21-RZ
Carlene (37918), July 2, 2021 at 12:08 PM
Please review attached PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210702120802.pdf
July 2, 2021
at 12:08 PM
3-SB-21-C
Diane
37924
3-SB-21-C
Diane (37924), July 2, 2021 at 12:43 PM
The schools will be over burdened with new students. Just now on Strawberry Plains Pike Habit For Humanity is building 112 houses . Then right behind it is another large subdivision being built with over 200 new houses that will empty out on Asheville HWY. That is just the latest two subdivision that the MPC has approved. The schools are at full capacity now. The MPC needs to consider this because it is a REAL CONCERN FOR THIS COMMUNITY!
July 2, 2021
at 12:43 PM
7-D-21-SP
James
37920
7-D-21-SP
James (37920), July 2, 2021 at 2:37 PM
It is now 1:00 PM and I just returned back into my house after viewing two beautiful (bucks) white tail deer grazing in my yard. This is one of many reasons that attracted us to this location off Maloney Rd. We moved here for the awesome beauty that nature has so adequately supplied. The ability to set on our deck in the early morning or late evening, enjoying the sound of birds chirping, an occasional screech awl, crickets and even frogs croaking; make the Maloney Road area worth saving. There are those who want to change our country style neighborhood (zoned for single family dwelling) into a downtown metropolitan. This is an unwelcomed change. Most of us want to breath fresh air not the fumes from CAT buses and increased motor traffic in the area. I believe most local residents will oppose rezoning of any kind. The Alcoa Hwy (TDOT) project and the new housing development off highway 33 (Old Maryville Pike) has pushed area wildlife to seek refuge in the nearly ten-acre wooded area that is now being considered for development. This abundance of wild life ranges from deer, fox, racoon, rabbit, squirrel, ground hog, and beautiful birds including some red-tail hawk. What a shame if rezoning is approved, we lose this rare treasure forever.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210702143745.pdf
July 2, 2021
at 2:37 PM
3-SB-21-C
Daniel
37902
3-SB-21-C
Daniel (37902), July 2, 2021 at 4:55 PM
I am writing on behalf of the Ruggles Ferry Community Association to request a 30-day postponement. A revised plan was recently submitted. The community would like additional time to obtain an independent traffic study and to suggest further revisions to the subdivision design. Please see the attached correspondence.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210702165512.pdf
July 2, 2021
at 4:55 PM
6-A-21-SP
Rhonda
37931
6-A-21-SP
Rhonda (37931), July 3, 2021 at 10:13 AM
I know that I'm not the only one that feels like we should have a few more restaurants or fast food places in the Karns community. Chik-fil-a for example. We have too many storage units and walk in clinics.
July 3, 2021
at 10:13 AM
7-C-21-PA
Sam
37920
7-C-21-PA
Sam (37920), July 3, 2021 at 10:32 AM
I am a long tine resident of Maloney Road (since 1946) and I am opposed to the case 7-C-21-PA. We are a quiet community of single residential homes. We have dealt for so long with the traffic of Alcoa Highway trying to cross it to enter and exit Maloney Road safely. Now with the new created roundabout, it is safer for both sides of Maloney Road and the Lakemoor community to cross the highway. But, because of the new roundabout, we now have increased "through traffic" to Maryville Pike. We have large trucks, big vans, and even semi-trucks traveling down our two-lane road. These trucks and vans either have to turn around or take Belt Road, another narrow two-lane road, not suited for that type of traffic. Maloney Road has a one-car tunnel at the other end and prevents this traffic from going on to Maryville Pike. This tunnel also is backed up many times in both directions with cars trying to reach Maryville Pike and Mount Elementary School. Plus we have all the traffic for Sevier Heights Baptist Church that backs the roundabout up. We do not need nor want another 400-500 additional cars from a 300-apartment complex added to the situation. These builders will not be living in this complex themselves, but we who do live here will have to deal with this mess forever. PLEASE VOTE NO TO THIS PLAN AND REZONING FROM R2.
July 3, 2021
at 10:32 AM
7-C-21-PA
Sam
37920
7-C-21-PA
Sam (37920), July 3, 2021 at 10:40 AM
I am writing to oppose case 7-C-21-PA. I am a long time resident of Maloney Road, and I already experience water run off problems across my property. During heavy rains, I receive water run off from anointing property across my back yard. Added to that, is water that flows from the Rolling Hills Subdivision. This water is flowing to get to a culvert, which goes under Maloney Road at my driveway. I also get water from another neighbor flowing to the same point. Because the culvert is so small and Knox County refuses to enlarge, the water backs up to the point the water flows over Maloney Road to get to the other side. Water at that point is about 6-8 feet deep at the road. The purposed apartment will back up to my property and I’m sure that will increase more water run off on to my property just because of all the concrete parking areas and all the different buildings. They tell us that will not be a problem but that’s what Rolling Hills told us when it was built, yet we live with the problem today. If this is passed, we are the people that have to deal and live with the problems from now on after the builders leave.

Please vote not to this plan and any rezoning from our residential R2.
July 3, 2021
at 10:40 AM
7-I-21-RZ
David
37932
7-I-21-RZ
David (37932), July 4, 2021 at 2:49 PM
 I would like to name a couple suggestions that possibility make the proposed development would acceptable to the residents of Black Rd and at the same time make the new homes more desirable (and sellable) to future home owners.

Suggestion #1. Make Black Rd. 3 feet wider. When the Black Forest subdivision was built 4 or 5 years ago, the Knox County Engineering department extended the north side of Black Rd. by 3 feet from the eastern property line of Black Forest subdivision to the top of the blind hill where the First Utility water tank is located. I suggest that the same thing be done by adding 3 feet to the north side of Black Rd. from the eastern property line of the new proposed subdivision to where Black Rd. has already been widen by 3 feet at the eastern property line of Black Forest subdivision. This would equate to about 3/10th of a mile of new paving.
Suggestion #2. Have the developer of the new subdivision add sidewalks along Black Rd. in the new development. The existing Black Forest subdivision has a sidewalk the run from the eastern to western end of the development. This equal close to a 1/2 mile of sidewalk. If the new proposed development had a sidewalk, it would about another 2/10th of a mile. It is correction that there would be about a 1/10th gap in the two sidewalks joining due to the fact that there are two individual properties between the two subdivision.
July 4, 2021
at 2:49 PM
7-D-21-SP
Gene and Cindy
37920
7-D-21-SP
Gene and Cindy (37920), July 4, 2021 at 9:00 PM
I oppose the Dominion group apartment complex zoning on Maloney Road. Maloney Road has too many hidden driveways and a safety concern to add more traffic. Also there are no sidewalks to Mount Olive Elementary. Along Alcoa Highway has so many sites better suited for an apartment complex this size with better traffic flow. There are many abandoned business lots in my opinion would be a much better location and you would have much less opposition. Those abandoned and unused business lots have so much potential to be built back up and provide shopping and restaurants within walking distance to the apartments.
July 4, 2021
at 9:00 PM
3-SB-21-C
Thomas
37871
3-SB-21-C
Thomas (37871), July 5, 2021 at 1:38 PM
The amount of homes being proposed is very inconsistent with the current density of the area. Traffic alone will increase risk to all people who currently live in the area. Traffic accidents will increase!
July 5, 2021
at 1:38 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Melanie
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Melanie (37920), July 5, 2021 at 6:29 PM
My family and I are strongly opposed to the construction of this apartment complex. We moved to south Knoxville from west Knoxville two summers ago and one of the deciding factors had to do with our efforts to flee the suffocating congestion of west Knoxville. Please don't bring that to our lovely, peaceful south Knoxville! I homeschool my three children, and we frequently take walks along Belt Rd., Legion, Smallwood and surrounding streets. I cringe to think about what extra traffic we would have to dodge with the introduction of upwards of 500 drivers of cars.

Also please don't make this decision for adding this development until you yourself have attempted to merge onto a "round-about" immediately outside of an apartment complex. My oldest child will be learning to drive in the next two years and this terrifies me!

These are considerations of life and death coming as desperate pleas from a mother, but I have not even touched on the heartache that would ensue if you took down nearly ten acres of woods right off the Maloney exit! Driving down Maloney towards Mt. Olive is like our own canopy of woods into the Smokies, right here in our front yards. Please keep that land as it is for those of us who reside here to enjoy.
To restate: we are IN OPPOSITION of changing the sector plan from single to multifamily dwelling.
July 5, 2021
at 6:29 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Carrie
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Carrie (37920), July 5, 2021 at 6:49 PM
As a homeowner on Maloney I am OPPOSED to the planned apartments at the end of Maloney road at Alcoa. I enjoy living in a quiet subdivision and moved to this side of town to enjoy less traffic. The traffic burden coupled with the KAT bus service would ruin this quiet atmosphere. I also believe the proposal places a burden on Mount Olive school at this time. Please DO NOT APPROVE the apartments at the end of Maloney and Alcoa Highway!!!!
July 5, 2021
at 6:49 PM
7-A-21-UR
Kaitlin
37923
7-A-21-UR
Kaitlin (37923), July 5, 2021 at 8:12 PM
Paws & Badges is a nonprofit organization that provides and trains service dogs for first-responders, veterans, and civilians suffering from PTSD. I am a recipient of one of those service dogs. Through their work, Mike and Amanda Bartleson saved my life. Because of them, their love for people and for dogs, I can live a fulfilling life. I now have the tools necessary to be the best wife and mother possible. I was once someone who was reclusive and suicidal. Paws & Badges, Amanda and Mike, my service dog… they all saved me from that. Without B&B K9, none of that would have been possible. I’ve had the pleasure of knowing Mike and Amanda for a couple of years, and during this time I’ve seen just how passionate they are about helping people and loving dogs. Outside of Paws & Badges, B&B K9 is an indispensable part of the Knoxville community. They are reliable, safe, and the only people I would ever entrust my service dog to. They are knowledgeable and experienced and they prioritize the needs of their clients above all else. Any community should embrace B&B K9 and the integrity of the work that they do. As a dog owner, I only trust my dogs with the best, and B&B K9 is just that… the best.
July 5, 2021
at 8:12 PM
7-A-21-UR
Peyton
37615
7-A-21-UR
Peyton (37615), July 5, 2021 at 8:35 PM
The work that B&B K9 does is life saving for a large Group of people through there charity paws and badges... service dogs have saved numerous people from suicide, Mike has always been so professional and nice, he trained our German shepherd when everyone else said he was untrainable.

Shutting him down is not only an attack on small business but an attack on veterans and law enforcement.
July 5, 2021
at 8:35 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Jonathan
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Jonathan (37920), July 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM
I'd like to oppose the development of 200-250 apartment units at or near Maloney Rd. The following items represent a few of the concerns I have regarding this proposed development, the first is traffic:

Adding 200-250 units adjacent to or on a two land residential road means a potential increase in traffic to the time of 400-500 cars plus visitors to the complex, further straining existing infrastructure.
July 5, 2021
at 9:23 PM
3-SB-21-C
Scott
37924
3-SB-21-C
Scott (37924), July 5, 2021 at 10:41 PM
This design is a disaster of sheer greed. The reason most of us choose to live here is because it is not farragut. People live here for a quiet country life. We don't want a walmart or thousands of houses. When I moved here the county told me that I could not have a lot smaller than one acre. Now if that applies to me it should apply to everyone. Otherwise I want to know who is being paid off?
July 5, 2021
at 10:41 PM
3-SB-21-C
Herb
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Herb (N/A), July 6, 2021 at 8:11 AM
Please review the attached letter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210706081109.pdf
July 6, 2021
at 8:11 AM
7-A-21-UR
Kelly
N/A
7-A-21-UR
Kelly (N/A), July 6, 2021 at 8:26 AM
My name is Kelly Morring, I am the sister of Michael and Amanda Bartleson owner's of B&B K-9 and his non profit Paws & Badges. I am emailing you tonight to show my support for there Business. I am a little confused how one person can persuade you to not allow this business to continue. Have you done any research on what he dose and how many people he helps? I will definitely be at the meeting on Thursday. I hope you all can do some research or reach out to the many individuals who Mike has helped not only with service dog's but the training he provides for his clients and their fur babies! This is not just a business for him this is his life, his passion, his happiness. PLEASE DON'T LET ONE PERSON RUIN THIS FOR SO MANY OTHERS.
July 6, 2021
at 8:26 AM
3-SB-21-C
Bo
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bo (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:00 AM
Please review the attached letter in regards to opposing the Innsbruck Farms Development. This 480+ home planned community is by far outside the density of the Ruggles Ferry Community. Concerns noted in the letter are the feeder roads to Asheville Highway, additional +/-4,400 daily trips down our roads, property value decline, current electrical, water and sewer grids and sanitation. This development will come very close to doubling the amount of homes in our area with nothing being done by the county in preparation for this.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210706100002.pdf
July 6, 2021
at 10:00 AM
3-SB-21-C
Andrea
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Andrea (N/A), July 6, 2021 at 10:33 AM
Please read attached letter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210706103347.pdf
July 6, 2021
at 10:33 AM
7-A-21-SU
Mindy
37917
7-A-21-SU
Mindy (37917), July 6, 2021 at 11:56 AM
Mindy don't want this store here would cause recks because kids have to walk threw and cars will try to pull in and they will get hit.
July 6, 2021
at 11:56 AM
7-A-21-SU
Stephanie
37917
7-A-21-SU
Stephanie (37917), July 6, 2021 at 12:04 PM
I think its a horrible idea to have another store on this road we have too many kids running around and the traffic there is horrible. No stop sign right there either.
July 6, 2021
at 12:04 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Rachel
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Rachel (37920), July 6, 2021 at 12:14 PM
I am strongly opposed to the apartment complexes at the end of Maloney Road. I work for the city and in my position see firsthand the amount of crime that can be incased within apartment complexes. If this goes the wrong way we could be dealing with juveniles who come into neighboring communities looking for opportunities to commit crimes. I see apartment complexes that are havens for drug dealing and gang activity to include regular shootings. I, along with several others, found this community years ago. Maloney Road has been a peaceful, quiet area...we have enjoyed living here. In addition, this small stretch of road is not conducive to the amount of traffic that this would bring in. We have a one lane tunnel at one end and the severe traffic from Sevier Heights on the other. I firmly believe this is not a good idea and that there are much better locations along Alcoa Hwy that would better serve this purpose if it is absolutely necessary.
July 6, 2021
at 12:14 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Brian
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Brian (37920), July 6, 2021 at 12:19 PM
I oppose the apartment complex at the Maloney Road/Alcoa Hwy interchange. My family lives down Maloney Road. We don't want to have to fear traffic, crime, noise pollution, and light pollution. We did not move to an area where KAT busses run for a reason. We want a safe place to raise our children.
July 6, 2021
at 12:19 PM
7-A-21-UR
Christina
37721
7-A-21-UR
Christina (37721), July 6, 2021 at 12:39 PM
Please read attached letter
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210706123954.pdf
July 6, 2021
at 12:39 PM
7-A-21-RZ
Carlene
N/A
7-A-21-RZ
Carlene (N/A), July 6, 2021 at 2:04 PM
Please read attachment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210706140425.pdf
July 6, 2021
at 2:04 PM
3-SB-21-C
Cecil
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Cecil (N/A), July 6, 2021 at 2:06 PM
WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO A NEW DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WE ARE OPPOSED TO A SUBDIVISION OF THIS MASSIVE SIZE & SCALE. THERE WOULD BE AN ESTIMATED 4,400 ADDITIONAL DAILY CAR TRIPS ON RUGGLES FERRY PIKE AND NEARBY ROADS WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR THAT MUCH TRAFFIC. WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOU TO VOTE NO.
July 6, 2021
at 2:06 PM
7-D-21-SP
India
37920
7-D-21-SP
India (37920), July 6, 2021 at 2:07 PM
I am writing in opposition to the apartment complex proposal. As a Lakemoor Hills resident already enduring noise and disruption from the "Gentleman's Ball" business, the highway and highway and even the church I cannot imagine adding apartments in this location. The approval of this project would set a precedent for similar properties along this small corridor counter to the residential neighborhoods that have bordered Alcoa highway for decades. The sector plan and the neighborhood’s vision could support more residential projects (successful developments have occurred on Maloney and Maryville pike) or even townhomes along this corridor but not large apartment complexes.

Despite being along the busy Alcoa highway this is a residential area.
July 6, 2021
at 2:07 PM
7-H-21-RZ
paul
37920
7-H-21-RZ
paul (37920), July 6, 2021 at 2:42 PM
I strongly oppose the proposed rezoning of this property. The proposed development does not fit the character of the neighborhood. We have invested our life savings into our home and choose the area based on single family dwelling / low density residential . The traffic, noise infrastructure, and water runoff issues are plenty enough to decline this request. You the members of the commission do not have to go along with every scheme developers have to increase their profits. Please respect the voice of the neighbors and decline this proposal.
July 6, 2021
at 2:42 PM
7-A-21-UR
Cindy
37918
7-A-21-UR
Cindy (37918), July 6, 2021 at 3:55 PM
I am writing with concern regarding B&B K9 not being allowed to operate at their current location on Emory Road. I have know Amanda and Mike for several years and they have trained my rescue dog. They are professional and very mindful of the surroundings when training. They truly care for the dogs and their owners. I have seen such compassion from both Mike and Amanda. I have also seen the other side of this family that works to provide support/service dogs for First Responders, Military, and private citizens who suffer from PTSD and other debilitating diseases, at no cost to the person. If you have time please go to the Paws and Badges website and do a quick glance at what they do. Giving the opportunity to continue this work will allow them to provide the support that sometimes a dog can only give and possibly save a life; whether it be one or twenty lives; it is very much worthwhile. I know in my heart that B & B K9 will continue to always be professional and mindful of those around them
July 6, 2021
at 3:55 PM
7-C-21-PA
Sam
37820
7-C-21-PA
Sam (37820), July 6, 2021 at 4:29 PM
Please see attached comments. Requesting commission vote in opposition of proposed developed on Maloney Road as it is not congruent with sector plan, rezoning, or one year plan.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210706162942.pdf
July 6, 2021
at 4:29 PM
7-A-21-UR
Applicant
7-A-21-UR
Applicant Correspondence
July 6, 2021 at 4:31 PM
My name is Mike Bartleson. I am currently the Founder of Paws & Badges Inc as well as the head volunteer trainer at B&B K-9 Obedience Training, which is owned by my wife Amanda Bartleson. I would like to inform you that I received a code complaint for a dog training facility that is being held behind my residence, which is unseen from the road. (Approximately 260 feet from E Emory Road).

I have read the letter that was sent in by the complainant who is my neighbor. After reviewing his letter, along with the County Code Maps, ETC. I was hoping I would be able to speak to someone concerning the false information that was provided by the complainant.

We did not buy this house to turn it into a dog obedience facility. We live on the front acre parcel in the main house with my 4 Kids and wife and inside dogs. Nothing is going to be built on our property other than a 6 foot chain and privacy fence. We only train dogs in a 4 car detached garage that is on the second parcel of land behind our house.

I hope this reaches you within time before the meeting.

Attached is information about how B&B K-9 operates as well as Paws & Badges Inc.

Any help or advice would help us out greatly. I'm just trying to help people in this community at an affordable price and no charge to any Recipients who have qualified for our P.T.S.D. Service Dog Program.
applicant
July 6, 2021
at 4:31 PM
7-A-21-SU
Samantha
37917
7-A-21-SU
Samantha (37917), July 6, 2021 at 7:44 PM
To much traffic flow for the kids who walk to and from school. There would be alot of stealing going on from the school kids coming in there. Main concern is the traffic. There is alot of kids walking by there every morning and every afternoon. Also there is already 2 convient stores on this same road would be useful to make it a car wash or laundry matt something other then another store.
July 6, 2021
at 7:44 PM
7-A-21-SU
Kayla
Dale
7-A-21-SU
Kayla (Dale ), July 6, 2021 at 7:44 PM
We already have two stores on that street and that already causes way to much traffic. We need more of a laundry mat or a car wash or restaurant would be nice not another store
July 6, 2021
at 7:44 PM
3-SB-21-C
Tom
3-SB-21-C
Tom July 6, 2021 at 7:58 PM
Please deny the Innsbruck Farms project. It is inconsistent with the surrounding area and puts your citizens at risk for a dangerous increase in traffic flow.
July 6, 2021
at 7:58 PM
3-SB-21-C
Arlene
37924
3-SB-21-C
Arlene (37924), July 6, 2021 at 8:27 PM
IMy family and I have enjoyed living on Ruggles Ferry Pike for over 25 yrs. The building of 482 houses will severely impact this area and not for the good. I cannot imagine the amount of cars that will not only be traveling our road but also the side roads that connect us to Ashville Highway. These side roads are narrow and hilly and would be dangerous with that much increased traffic. Our community is rural, the homes that have been built here in the last several years have been well spaced and have not been detrimental to the area as this subdivision would be. Please consider our community when you vote.
July 6, 2021
at 8:27 PM
3-SB-21-C
Robert
37924
3-SB-21-C
Robert (37924), July 6, 2021 at 8:51 PM
Please deny the Innsbruck Farm request.
July 6, 2021
at 8:51 PM
3-SB-21-C
Elnora
37924
3-SB-21-C
Elnora (37924), July 6, 2021 at 8:57 PM
Please deny the Innsbruck Farm request. Consider the negative impact this development will have on our Community.
July 6, 2021
at 8:57 PM
3-SB-21-C
Fred
37871
3-SB-21-C
Fred (37871), July 6, 2021 at 8:58 PM
I have lived in the Ruggles Ferry area for 22 years. As I consider the ramifications of the 3-SB-21-C development, I cannot believe that MPC would allow this as proposed. There is no way these roads can handle the amount of traffic that would be generated as a result of 475 homes in this small of an area. The traffic studies that have been done had major flaws, and seem to be extremely biased toward "railroading" a decision. With only 2 access points to 475 homes, traffic would be a nightmare.Utilities would drastically change, and it would have a major impact on the Carter schools, which would fall back on the county to deal with and pay for.The developer has advertised 'waterfront property' but the elevation in the designated area makes water access impossible. No consideration has been given to the environmental fallout this would cause. Where are the studies for that?This proposal is completely out of character for the surrounding area.I think I am safe in saying there is no way that any of our planning commission members would approve a development like this in their own area.Please deny the present proposal and ask the developer to come back with a reasonable plan.Thank you.
July 6, 2021
at 8:58 PM
7-A-21-SU
KELLY
37923
7-A-21-SU
KELLY (37923), July 6, 2021 at 9:13 PM
Not a good idea at all the traffic and the kids then all the cars kids have to cross there would be an accident I do not agree with this at all. It's a BIG NO for Me!
July 6, 2021
at 9:13 PM
3-SB-21-C
Chris
37924
3-SB-21-C
Chris (37924), July 6, 2021 at 9:30 PM
We have lived on Ruggles Ferry for over 40 years and have seen many changes during those years.
This is still a rural community and neighbors still know each other. Ruggles Ferry is a winding 7 + mile road it is still a common site to see tractors and other farm equipment on this road. The home owners own over 7 miles of Ruggles Ferry the developer owns 200'. Who stands to loose the most
if this mess goes through the way the developer wants? Fact this road is not suitable for the amount
of traffic this proposed sub division will bring along with it. I am asking that you listen to our speaker
who represents this community and vote DENIED to the developer!!
July 6, 2021
at 9:30 PM
3-SB-21-C
Daniel
37872
3-SB-21-C
Daniel (37872), July 6, 2021 at 9:43 PM
Having arrived in the North Ruggles Ferry area recently from northern Virginia I am impressed by the rural nature and peaceful surroundings….a sense a “space”. I have seen big developments scrape/rape the land in my former hometown, where developments similar to Innsbruck Farms were allowed. All of the concerns voiced by current RF residents (traffic, infrastructure, crime, blight) came to pass there. Let’s not allow it to happen here!
July 6, 2021
at 9:43 PM
7-A-21-SU
Janet
37923
7-A-21-SU
Janet (37923), July 6, 2021 at 9:45 PM
Traffic is way to fast people speed never doing the speed limit would cause wrecks no stop sign their just a bad idea
July 6, 2021
at 9:45 PM
3-SB-21-C
Emily
37871
3-SB-21-C
Emily (37871), July 6, 2021 at 9:50 PM
I go on record in opposition to the proposed development at Innsbruck Farms. I respectfully request Commission members take the time to actually READ these public comments posted on this case. I will not restate….since many many others have well articulated our reasons for not wanting a development of such density. I share those concerns. I share their opposition. Thank you for your time & consideration.
July 6, 2021
at 9:50 PM
3-SB-21-C
Tim
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tim (37871), July 6, 2021 at 9:57 PM
The residents of the Ruggles Ferry Community are unified in our opposition to this Concept Plan. We are very supportive of well thought out plans that create new opportunities in our community. Unfortunately, this plan is not that. It is complete opposite and not in alignment with the surrounding community. If this plan was for 150 homes on minimum 1 acre lots with other variants sizes of lots larger, the community would embrace and support that plan and welcome new neighbors as we have done throughout our history. Our residents currently opposed to this plan, own over 6,000 acres in the community and the land owners and developer own 201 acres. It is sad that residents who own 99.99% of the road frontage and 6,000 acres that is opposed to this development, have to endure developments such as this as "math exercises" to make massive profits to force disruption, and destruction in our community.

Our community is a very special place and we respectfully request the MPC to DENY this concept plan application or make significant requirements to revise this plan to be more harmonious with the community regarding density, traffic, safety and alignment with the rural character of our community.
July 6, 2021
at 9:57 PM
3-SB-21-C
Mike
37924
3-SB-21-C
Mike (37924), July 6, 2021 at 9:57 PM
We live off Rugglesferry on a dead end st. When sunnyview school buses start bringing kids in and out, traffic backs up onto Rugglesferry. With an additional 4000plus vehicles/trips impacting our main access road traffic onto Asheville Hwy we will have awful congestion especially at peak hours. We all know how frequently we have motor vehicle accidents on Asheville Hwy/John Sevier and Strawberry Plains that all run into Asheville Hwy and I40 Ramps. Just look at how many motor vehicle accidents already in 2021. Emergency vehicles will be impacted and lives will be lost because of congestion let alone a simple fender bender or broken down vehicle. We have Neals Landing off Brakebill/Asheville Hwy 4 way intersection also expanding with new homes going in let alone bigger concerns like the Amazon facility and additional tractor trailers that will be frequenting the I 40 area not minutes from here.
July 6, 2021
at 9:57 PM
3-SB-21-C
Marian
37924
3-SB-21-C
Marian (37924), July 6, 2021 at 9:59 PM
I pray you vote to DENY the Innsbruck housing proposal. This project will be a detriment to our rural community. PLEASE …..DENY this proposal!!!!!!
July 6, 2021
at 9:59 PM
3-SB-21-C
Gail
37872
3-SB-21-C
Gail (37872), July 6, 2021 at 10:05 PM
Innsbruck Farms should be DENIED! DENY a cabal of duplicitous money mongers the right to ruin the dreams of so many of us who cherish our quiet rural life here. DENY them the right to turn North Ruggles Ferry area into Farragut or Hardin Valley. We came here to get away from that rat race! DENY them the right to BULLY local residents by imposing the will of the few on many. The negative impact on local residents cannot be overstated. DENY this ill considered development!!!!
July 6, 2021
at 10:05 PM
3-SB-21-C
Elyse
37924
3-SB-21-C
Elyse (37924), July 6, 2021 at 10:05 PM
Please hear all our many voices, begging you to deny the proposal for Innsbruck Farms Subdivision to be developed. Not only will it completely alter the feel of the area, the schools and roads will be a nightmare with the influx. Not to mention all the wildlife species (including bald eagles!) that it will destroy/push out! The developer has given the impression he was taking into account the community’s concerns. After all this time (and postponement requests), they came to us with a laughable “alternate plan.” It is such an incredibly small tweak to the original, that it’s insulting. It’s sad, but greed causes much damage. We implore you to think of all the implications and problems this could cause and help us as a community that has stepped up and united together for the good. We would love to see something done with the land that preserves the beauty and heritage of the area and still gives the seller a fair price. Please give this serious thought and attention, honoring the many who have spent countless hours and much energy, money, etc., in an effort to bring this appeal before you and speak for the large community impacted by this proposal.
July 6, 2021
at 10:05 PM
7-A-21-SU
Sue
37914
7-A-21-SU
Sue (37914), July 6, 2021 at 10:05 PM
very bad place to put a store would be bad the store woud get robbed alot the other stores get robbed already! Not safe at all!
July 6, 2021
at 10:05 PM
3-SB-21-C
Barb
37924
3-SB-21-C
Barb (37924), July 6, 2021 at 10:07 PM
I live in Graysburg Sub Div off Bagwell Rd that flows out onto Rugglesferry. When Sunnyview school traffic is bringing kids in n from school being a dead end one way in one way out traffic just waits in line as the buses start to go on their routes. We have no choice but to sit and wait. My big concern is with recent issues at Austin East emergency vehicles having to respond to a serious alert at Sunnyview or surrounding homes will be stuck because the traffic will build up in all directions from Bagwell trying to enter or leave onto Rugglesferry let alone traffic coming off of Asheville Hwy. Lives will be lost in the event of a school shooting, fire, motor vehicle accident etc.
July 6, 2021
at 10:07 PM
3-SB-21-C
Anne
37871
3-SB-21-C
Anne (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:08 PM
I strongly urge you to deny the Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan 3-SB-21-C. I am not against developing this property but I am against the density of the development and the problems it will bring.

I live on the corner of Ruggles Ferry Pike and Graves Road. Between the main entrance to Innsbruck Farms which is 1 1/2 miles from my driveway there are 5 working farms that touch Ruggles Ferry. Ours being one of these. On the east side of the main entrance are another 2 working farms. That is a total of 7 working farms that use Ruggles Ferry every day. We have many slow moving tractors, equipment and other farm vehicles that use Ruggles Ferry each day. How do you think these are going to compete with an additional 4400 car trips per day. This is a safety issue for my husband, my son and my grandson. Essentially this is going to put us out of business. We not only lose our income but our way of life that we have worked so hard to hang on too. My husband's grandparents purchased this farm in the early part of the 1940's. My husband was born on this farm, as were our children and grandchildren. We all still live here together. We are 5 generations living and working on this farm.

This development will destroy our community. Please, I urge you to deny this subdivision concept plan.
July 6, 2021
at 10:08 PM
3-SB-21-C
Amy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Amy (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:15 PM
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE

Vote NO on Innsbruck Farms. Fire zoning laws, recent traffic studies, wetland preservation and bald eagle conservation clearly provide evidence of a lack of infrastructure, safety issues and potential ecological violations.

This monstrosity of a build among rural homes and farmland will destroy the beautiful landscape forever and cause irreversible damage to our community and the environment. Please stop this build.
July 6, 2021
at 10:15 PM
7-A-21-SU
Carmyah
37917
7-A-21-SU
Carmyah (37917), July 6, 2021 at 10:19 PM
I wouldn't want another store on that road its not a great neighborhood kids are right there there's alot of shootings in that neighborhood and with the school next door and if we kids was to be letting out for school and drug deal go bad a Innocent kid or kids could get injured or may end up dead not a good idea for a store there cars speed as well threw there isnt any stop sighns to slow them down!
July 6, 2021
at 10:19 PM
3-SB-21-C
Mary
37872
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37872), July 6, 2021 at 10:22 PM
I have posted comments here before. In March of this year. Is developer (Blaine Chrisman) trying to drag this out in hopes that our opposition will lose momentum? Months ago he tried to couch it in terms of "addressing the concerns of the community" and seeking a "win-win" solution. And now, months later, after several canceled meetings and ignored requests, his "willingness" to compromise consists of a "revised plan" which drops density from 482 units to 475! And a "riverfront community park" where no one except a billy goat can access the river(?!?!) This speaks volumes about the consideration this developer gives to our community. Clearly he is only chasing the $$$$. Yet all of us will pay the piper if this development is approved. We don’t want him or those of his ilk despoiling/desecrating our community. I am still opposed!
July 6, 2021
at 10:22 PM
3-SB-21-C
John
37918
3-SB-21-C
John (37918), July 6, 2021 at 10:24 PM
I grew up and my parents still live at 8617 Ruggles Ferry Pike. We respectively request this project to be denied based upon the size of the project and it's impact on the community.

Two concerns are top of mind:
- The additional traffic and lack of a plan to adequately support the additional daily commuters.
- The types of homes that will be brought to the neighborhood. With no restrictions on the type of homes that can be built, anything could end up being built that would hurt the community.

Again, please deny this property until a plan for a much smaller development is brought before the board.
July 6, 2021
at 10:24 PM
3-SB-21-C
Bill
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bill (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:26 PM
I am urging you to deny Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan 3-SB-21-C.

The idea of 475 homes on 171 acres is so far out of step with our community that words are hard to come by to express my total adversity to this plan. The people who live in this community have space of their own to enjoy life. The vast majority of our community would welcome a development with bigger lots and houses (150 to 200 dwellings on this property). By building 475 houses on small lots, with concrete driveways with 5.2 miles of roads, removal of the woodland already on this property, there will be a irreversible effect on the environment in our neighborhood.

I fine it very offensive that we as a community have to give up our enjoyment and peacefulness so the developer who has never lived here and the project manager can follow their greed for money when all the rest of the community will suffer forever. We will loose our peace and tranquility we have enjoyed for years.

I am 74 years old and have lived on the same piece of land my entire life. I have farmed this land and still do along with my son and grandson. I also have neighbors that still farm in the Ruggles Ferry area. Safety is a big issue for us since we use Ruggles Ferry with our slow moving farm equipment.

I beg you to deny this 475 home concept because it will destroy the peacefulness and the safety of this community.
July 6, 2021
at 10:26 PM
3-SB-21-C
Peggy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM
I am strong opposed to 3-SB-21-C. Please deny this request.
July 6, 2021
at 10:28 PM
3-SB-21-C
Donna
rry.
3-SB-21-C
Donna (rry. ), July 6, 2021 at 10:29 PM
I am opposed to the Innsbruck plan on Ruggles Ferry.

There are countless reasons why this plan should be denied but I will only address a few.

Traffic is already an issue on Ruggles Ferry and with the proposed 482 houses (the most dense development in Knox County) it will be unbearable. It is already a challenge for us to go to our mailbox and my grandchildren cannot play in our front yard. We have numerous children living on this road and safety is a huge issue.

We lose power frequently now and I can’t imagine how the power will be affected with 482 more dwellings.

We chose to live in a quiet peaceful area in Knox County not in a highly traveled congested area. And now this way of life is being challenged. This is a total money maker for some but for us it totally disrupts our way of life. A beautiful tranquil farm land is going to be ruined forever because of greed

We are not against development but this is ridiculous and goes against what this community is so proud of

Please vote to deny this plan.
July 6, 2021
at 10:29 PM
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah
37871
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:30 PM
I’d like to submit to you my opposition to the development of Innsbruck Farms. I was born and raised on Ruggles Ferry and my husband and I purchased 5 acres on which to raise our family. We currently have three teenagers and one of the biggest concerns I have is the traffic a subdivision that size would yield on Ruggles Ferry. We chose to build in this area with a more rural feel. The development of a subdivision with 400 plus homes does not fit the landscape of this community. Please consider all our community members have expressed to you & deny the request of this plan!
July 6, 2021
at 10:30 PM
3-SB-21-C
Connie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Connie (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:32 PM
This proposal is so far outside of what the rest of the area is like. It will affect traffic and safety, property values, schools, and environment in a negative way. The developer is unwilling to make any significant compromises, and the changes he has made are laughable. He says "the math doesn't work" but in actuality what it will cost the residents and Knox County is a much bigger stretch than anything he can show. Please deny this proposal - it does not consider the residents in the area and only put money in the pockets of one individual or company.
July 6, 2021
at 10:32 PM
3-SB-21-C
Gail
3-SB-21-C
Gail July 6, 2021 at 10:35 PM
I respectfully voice my opposition to this Case which will be voted on Thursday July 8. Please take the time to review comments posted on your website. Many residents of our local community have taken time to articulate their concerns and opposition. It would be a disappointment if those voices are not heard by members of Knox County Planning Commission. And of course a much bigger disappointment if the Innsbruck Farm development is approved as currently proposed.
July 6, 2021
at 10:35 PM
3-SB-21-C
Pam
37871
3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:40 PM
Please DENY this concept plan. Too many houses for our neighborhood with too much traffic congestion.
July 6, 2021
at 10:40 PM
3-SB-21-C
Donald
37871
3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), July 6, 2021 at 10:48 PM
Please deny approval of this development which is ridiculously too large for this rural area and its infrastructure. Please listen to an entire community that is joined in opposition to the plan.
July 6, 2021
at 10:48 PM
3-SB-21-C
Mary
37872
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37872), July 6, 2021 at 10:52 PM
I still oppose this development. For reasons already submitted. Please read all posted Public Comments before making your decision
July 6, 2021
at 10:52 PM
3-SB-21-C
Paula
3-SB-21-C
Paula ( ), July 6, 2021 at 10:52 PM
Please deny this development. We moved here for the peace and quiet of the country, not to have houses so close that you could reach out of your window and shake hands with your neighbor. Please consider the many people in this neighborhood, not just the few that are seeing dollar signs this development will bring them.
July 6, 2021
at 10:52 PM
3-SB-21-C
Larry
37924
3-SB-21-C
Larry (37924), July 6, 2021 at 11:15 PM
Please vote No on Innsbruck Farms development. Previous land owners have managed to sell property within the community settings. This is a poorly thought out plan that has zero consideration for the land / home owners in the community of Ruggles Ferry Pike!
July 6, 2021
at 11:15 PM
3-SB-21-C
Jennifer
37871
3-SB-21-C
Jennifer (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:18 PM
Please don’t let greed surpass common sense.
July 6, 2021
at 11:18 PM
3-SB-21-C
Bobby
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bobby (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:28 PM
My family and I oppose this development strongly. Please reconsider for the safety of the kids on this road. This area does not have this amount of housing and do not feel it is safe.
July 6, 2021
at 11:28 PM
3-SB-21-C
David
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:34 PM
Ruggles Ferry Road is not Middlebrook Pike. It cannot possibly handle the additional 4,420 vehicular trips per weekday projected by the traffic study for this proposed project. It couldn’t even handle half that number. The safety of every individual in this community depends on the wisdom and common sense of the MPC. Please deny this proposal.
July 6, 2021
at 11:34 PM
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah
37871
3-SB-21-C
Suzannah (37871), July 6, 2021 at 11:44 PM
I am opposed to this large of a development on the allotted land. There will be an overwhelming number of cars on Ruggles Ferry and its small feeder roads that will completely alter the aesthetic of the area.
July 6, 2021
at 11:44 PM
3-SB-21-C
Abbey
37924
3-SB-21-C
Abbey (37924), July 6, 2021 at 11:50 PM
As a lifelong Ruggles Ferry resident, I am highly opposed to development of this magnitude. This development does not suit this area and would have immense negative impacts on the surrounding community. I grew up here and have become a homeowner here, and realize the harsh affects this would have on infrastructure and well-being of the community. I urge decision makers to deny this application. We are not against development, but a development this size is irresponsible and hurtful.
July 6, 2021
at 11:50 PM
3-SB-21-C
Hayden
37924
3-SB-21-C
Hayden (37924), July 6, 2021 at 11:51 PM
As a homeowner that would be greatly affected by this development I strongly oppose the grossly oversized plan that has been submitted. I love living in this part of the county because of the rural setting and lack of overcrowding that is seen in other pats of the county. Placing nearly 500 new homes in a minuscule part of this community would greatly diminish the safety and attraction that this community holds.
July 6, 2021
at 11:51 PM
3-SB-21-C
Abbey
37924
3-SB-21-C
Abbey (37924), July 7, 2021 at 12:00 AM
All community members are in agreement, as demonstrated by the signs lined along Ruggles Ferry and feeder roads. The applicants have not properly researched the traffic patterns, just one example of their poorly prepared plan. They are focused on profit and not the potential impacts of this united community. Denying this application puts the community members first.
July 7, 2021
at 12:00 AM
3-SB-21-C
Hayden
37924
3-SB-21-C
Hayden (37924), July 7, 2021 at 12:01 AM
Massive development that overwhelms the available infrastructure would cause far more harm than good for this community. I strongly oppose the planned proposal.
July 7, 2021
at 12:01 AM
3-SB-21-C
Abbey
37924
3-SB-21-C
Abbey (37924), July 7, 2021 at 12:05 AM
As a young person in the community, I understand the need for growth and encourage it. However, 482 homes is unreasonable and unsustainable, especially on approx. 200 acres.
July 7, 2021
at 12:05 AM
3-SB-21-C
David
37871
3-SB-21-C
David (37871), July 7, 2021 at 2:57 AM
Having lived on Ruggles Ferry Pike for over 15 years and having had family in the area for over 150 years, I have great concerns over the proposed Innsbruck Farm Development that is coming before the committee for a vote this Thursday. This development is in no way representative of other residences in the area regarding lot sizes and total of number of houses requested to be built. The roads in the area will not adequately accommodate such a tremendous influx of daily travel that will result from the number of homes proposed. This is a rural area with numerous farms and regular travel of tractors on the roadway. It is a quiet, serene neighborhood with families who decided to move here for that reason. I understand growth will occur, but I feel this should be done in a reasonable and responsible manner. This egregious proposition by the developers of Innsbruck Farms should be rejected due to the total inappropriateness of the request. The development does not fit with the area and there have been insufficient traffic studies to accurately show the demise to the community that this project will cause. I ask that you speak for us in disallowing this proposal to continue. Our ability as common citizens is limited, but you have the entrusted authority to stand up for us. Please do so.
July 7, 2021
at 2:57 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jo
37924
3-SB-21-C
Jo (37924), July 7, 2021 at 3:42 AM
Extremely opposed to this plan!!! Asking it be DENIED!!!!!
July 7, 2021
at 3:42 AM
3-SB-21-C
David
37924
3-SB-21-C
David (37924), July 7, 2021 at 5:05 AM
I am still totally against this subdivision plan in it's current state and as proposed.
July 7, 2021
at 5:05 AM
3-SB-21-C
Evangelynn
37924
3-SB-21-C
Evangelynn (37924), July 7, 2021 at 5:06 AM
Please, please reject this proposal as currently written. This is absolutely nothing but a money game for these people, but for those of us who actually live in the community that will be very affected by this development, it is our whole way of life that will be impacted (destroyed). Please put the needs of real human beings above GREED and reject this proposal as it is currently written.
July 7, 2021
at 5:06 AM
3-SB-21-C
James
37871
3-SB-21-C
James (37871), July 7, 2021 at 5:29 AM
Please vote no to this proposal. Traffic nightmare.
July 7, 2021
at 5:29 AM
3-SB-21-C
William and Shirley
37871
3-SB-21-C
William and Shirley (37871), July 7, 2021 at 6:31 AM
As requested in previous correspondences, please preserve the character of our neighborhoods, the purity of our River, and the safety of all who live and travel Ruggles Ferry Pike. Your understanding of our plight is essential.
July 7, 2021
at 6:31 AM
3-SB-21-C
Josh
37924
3-SB-21-C
Josh (37924), July 7, 2021 at 6:49 AM
Please consider denying this plan. The area will not support this many houses and I feel this will negative impact on our community for years to come.
July 7, 2021
at 6:49 AM
3-SB-21-C
Albert
30305
3-SB-21-C
Albert (30305), July 7, 2021 at 6:53 AM
I strongly oppose the development of Innsbruck Farms development.
July 7, 2021
at 6:53 AM
3-SB-21-C
Bo
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bo (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:19 AM
This concept plan needs to be denied. Community cannot support this many houses and daily trips.
July 7, 2021
at 7:19 AM
3-SB-21-C
steve
37924
3-SB-21-C
steve (37924), July 7, 2021 at 7:21 AM
I am not opposed to some development but this proposal is to dense for our community. Our roads will not support the traffic flow. Change is ok but this is dramatic.
July 7, 2021
at 7:21 AM
3-SB-21-C
Shannon
37871
3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:37 AM
I am still very much OPPOSED to the development of Innsbruck Farms as proposed.
July 7, 2021
at 7:37 AM
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie
37924
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37924), July 7, 2021 at 7:45 AM
Please take the extensive proposed Innsbruck Farms subdivision into consideration. The extreme amount of homes is above and beyond the limitations of our quiet neighborhood.
July 7, 2021
at 7:45 AM
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:48 AM
We DON'T want 475 homes in our neighborhood, we don't want the additional traffic on our rural roads, we don't want 10 YEARS of construction. We want to maintain our rural, country characteristic.
July 7, 2021
at 7:48 AM
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:48 AM
We DON'T want 475 homes in our neighborhood, we don't want the additional traffic on our rural roads, we don't want 10 YEARS of construction. We want to maintain our rural, country characteristic.
July 7, 2021
at 7:48 AM
3-SB-21-C
Sharon
37871
3-SB-21-C
Sharon (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:58 AM
Please deny the plan for Innsbruck Farms on Ruggles Ferry. My husband has lived on Ruggles Ferry for 60 years, and myself for 40 years. We own two homes that will be impacted by this development. Please consider the safety issues that a development of this size will have on the citizens of Ruggles Ferry.
July 7, 2021
at 7:58 AM
3-SB-21-C
Davina
37871
3-SB-21-C
Davina (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:59 AM
I’m concerned about this large of a development in this community. Concerned for the impact on the Holston River and the area wildlife of both the river and land. Concerned for the impact on Carter schools, large volume of traffic, and road conditions. Too many houses!
July 7, 2021
at 7:59 AM
3-SB-21-C
Stacey
37871
3-SB-21-C
Stacey (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:00 AM
We oppose!! Do not overload this community with traffic, crime, noise pollution. We moved out here to be away from the congestion. We moved from an area in another state that did this. It ruined the area and the city. Too much growth is not always a good thing.
July 7, 2021
at 8:00 AM
3-SB-21-C
Kim
37932
3-SB-21-C
Kim (37932), July 7, 2021 at 8:14 AM
After careful consideration of all concept planning documents, review of the RA Low Density Residential zoning ordinance, meeting with citizens, and visiting the proposed site and surrounding area, I ask for your consideration to postpone or deny this proposed plan based on the following provided in the attached document.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707081408.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 8:14 AM
3-SB-21-C
Nancy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Nancy (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:15 AM
I am here to express my extreme disappointment in the Innsbruck Farms development. I am strongly opposed to the building of 480+ homes in my area. I live on Ruggles Ferry and the traffic is already ridiculous. I moved here for the beauty and the country feeling it has and this will certainly destroy it. Once the commission sees these studies they will be able to see that the area cannot currently support and additional 4,500 to 5,000 additional trips by passenger cars, school busses, delivery vehicles, farm equipment and construction trucks. Please deny this application to overbuild a quiet, rural community. This is all about money and greed.
July 7, 2021
at 8:15 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jane
37924
3-SB-21-C
Jane (37924), July 7, 2021 at 8:25 AM
Please deny plan for Innsbruck Farms! It will be DETRIMENTAL for our rural setting! As a community we love our peaceful surroundings.
July 7, 2021
at 8:25 AM
3-SB-21-C
Carl
37924
3-SB-21-C
Carl (37924), July 7, 2021 at 8:35 AM
Please see the attachment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707083550.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 8:35 AM
3-SB-21-C
Michael
37924
3-SB-21-C
Michael (37924), July 7, 2021 at 8:36 AM
My opposition to this development is of paramount concern to not only myself but to my fellow neighbors in this entire community. Approval of such a subdivision will destroy our rural identity and and create problems far reaching in to every ones future in this area. A housing development of this nature will be a detriment to this area. The scale of this proposal is ludicrous with the only factor being met is money. Please, someone in their right mind, stop this proposal from going any further.
July 7, 2021
at 8:36 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jeff
3787
3-SB-21-C
Jeff ( 3787), July 7, 2021 at 8:38 AM
Tomorrow is the day, you have the opportunity to stand up for Ruggles Ferry community and deny the concept plan for Innsbruck Farms. A great name choice to make it sound like it fits the community as it now exists. Growth is not the issue here, high density development in a zoned low density area is the issue. One only has to look reasonably at the plan, the surrounding area, and the other housing developments in the area to conclude the size of this plan is an abomination to common sense. The developers statement that "they can’t make the money work" if the development is smaller tells you all you need to know. This is all about making money regardless of the impact on the surrounding community, traffics and safety concerns, and schools. I ask you to please deny this concept plan as it is now.
July 7, 2021
at 8:38 AM
3-SB-21-C
Wayne
37924
3-SB-21-C
Wayne (37924), July 7, 2021 at 8:40 AM
Please stop this build!
July 7, 2021
at 8:40 AM
3-SB-21-C
John
37871
3-SB-21-C
John (37871), July 7, 2021 at 8:52 AM
I am writing you today asking you to deny the Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan. This area is still a quiet countryside and all of us who live here value that lifestyle. This development will destroy our area. It will make it look like West or North Knoxville. Many of the people who have moved into this community are running to escape that style of living. Do what's right for the taxpayers who live here! DENY!!
July 7, 2021
at 8:52 AM
3-SB-21-C
Tracy
37924
3-SB-21-C
Tracy (37924), July 7, 2021 at 8:56 AM
I oppose this development. A development of this size will drastically change our community and the beauty within. We do not want the construction, traffic, destruction, strain on our school systems, or anything else that this will bring.
July 7, 2021
at 8:56 AM
3-SB-21-C
Powell
3787
3-SB-21-C
Powell ( 3787), July 7, 2021 at 8:56 AM
Please say no to Subdivision on Ruggles Ferry Pike.
July 7, 2021
at 8:56 AM
3-SB-21-C
Debbie
37924
3-SB-21-C
Debbie (37924), July 7, 2021 at 8:59 AM
I am requesting at this time that this plan be denied. This plan will bring traffic, crime, overload our schools. Most of the residents that have purchased homes around here enjoy the life of rural living. They have spent there working life purchasing homes in the country. This is just a pad your pockets deal. No consideration was taken into account for all the residents that have worked hard for a quiet life. DENY this ridiculous plan that sits in front of you.
July 7, 2021
at 8:59 AM
3-SB-21-C
Susan
37924
3-SB-21-C
Susan (37924), July 7, 2021 at 9:06 AM
The development of the sheer number of homes in this planned subdivision will overwhelm the county road system, the rural setting and habitats, the schools of the east end, as well as, destroy the lifestyle chosen by the people who already live in this area by choice.
July 7, 2021
at 9:06 AM
3-SB-21-C
Becky
37924
3-SB-21-C
Becky (37924), July 7, 2021 at 9:14 AM
I have lived on Burris Road for 40 years we choose to live in this rural setting for the peaceful quiet surroundings. We choose to live where there was not a lot of traffic. We choose to live where we get to enjoy the sounds of nature and see the animals who also reside in this rural setting. We are not opposed to new building in this area BUT we DO NOT want under planned, over crowded, subdivisions that change the character of this area..please take our way of living into consideration as you make decisions that will affect our way of life for here on out.
July 7, 2021
at 9:14 AM
3-SB-21-C
Thomas
37871
3-SB-21-C
Thomas (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:17 AM
I am opposed to the Innsbruck Farms project due to it's poorly planned lay out. You have a developer wanting to develop 200 acres that will negatively impact all of the property owners in the immediate area that own 6,000 acres. That is classic tail wagging the dog thinking. Not to mention the risk you put your citizens in by increased traffic and congestion. Please deny this project.
July 7, 2021
at 9:17 AM
3-SB-21-C
Bo
37871
3-SB-21-C
Bo (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:18 AM
The MPC Commission needs to deny this concept plan. If you have not driven the Ruggles Ferry Community you need to before a decision is made. You can see first hand how this dense development will ruin our area.
July 7, 2021
at 9:18 AM
3-SB-21-C
Brad
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), July 7, 2021 at 9:30 AM
I strongly ask the Commission to look at what is proposed and deny the request for the Innsbruck Farms Subdivision. The changes offered by the developer are laughable and honestly insulting. Once again, the new proposal offers nothing new to improve the area. Nor does it offer any solution for traffic that will inundate Ruggles Ferry and other small county roads with cars. This development creates more problems than it does benefits to the area and has not been thought through very well. As a government entity it is your job to hear the voice of the community and figure out what is best, not listen to a handful seeking to gain a profit and move away from the community they are effecting.
July 7, 2021
at 9:30 AM
3-SB-21-C
Kevin
37918
3-SB-21-C
Kevin (37918), July 7, 2021 at 9:43 AM
The proposed Concept Plan for Innsbruck Farms (3-SB-21-C) raises a number of issues and concerns, which KCPA believes the Planning Commission needs to thoroughly examine. Please see the attached letter for questions concerning open space, connectivity to adjacent recreational uses, interior sidewalks for student access to bus stops, necessary transportation improvements, peripheral boundary, and community compatibility.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707094342.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 9:43 AM
3-SB-21-C
Robin
37861
3-SB-21-C
Robin (37861), July 7, 2021 at 9:57 AM
I would like to see the MPC deny the 475 home development . There are so many reasons on so many different levels
July 7, 2021
at 9:57 AM
3-SB-21-C
Wilma
37924
3-SB-21-C
Wilma (37924), July 7, 2021 at 10:00 AM
Please don’t let that many homes go on so few acres and add to our traffic. This is our rural area that we love and would like to keep that way.
July 7, 2021
at 10:00 AM
3-SB-21-C
Justin
37871
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:11 AM
See attached pdf.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707101152.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 10:11 AM
3-SB-21-C
Brad
37871
3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:15 AM
I ask that this plan be denied. It doesn’t fit with the rural character and the developer has not acted in good faith with the community.
July 7, 2021
at 10:15 AM
3-SB-21-C
William
37924
3-SB-21-C
William (37924), July 7, 2021 at 10:16 AM
We are strongly opposed to this subdivision because of the stress on all roads in this area. The number of houses they are planning to build would put a lot more cars on Burris Rd and all other roads. Our school system would not be able to handle the growth.
July 7, 2021
at 10:16 AM
3-SB-21-C
Kathy
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kathy (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:18 AM
This large of a development will have a negative impact on the community. Significant traffic impact on a rural road that doesn’t even have a shoulder. Development should be consistent with the area it is to be located within. I strongly oppose & ask for denial of builders request as presented.
July 7, 2021
at 10:18 AM
3-SB-21-C
Justin
37914
3-SB-21-C
Justin (37914), July 7, 2021 at 10:22 AM
I ask that this plan be denied. It doesn’t fit with the rural character and the developer has not acted in good faith with the community.
July 7, 2021
at 10:22 AM
3-SB-21-C
Joshua
37924
3-SB-21-C
Joshua (37924), July 7, 2021 at 10:22 AM
This many homes will forever change the essence of what has made our community special for many generations. I still oppose the plan and hope to see more meaningful changes proposed.
July 7, 2021
at 10:22 AM
3-SB-21-C
Tyler
37861
3-SB-21-C
Tyler (37861), July 7, 2021 at 10:24 AM
I ask this plan to be denied. This plan does not meet the rural character of the community.
July 7, 2021
at 10:24 AM
3-SB-21-C
Becca
37909
3-SB-21-C
Becca (37909), July 7, 2021 at 10:24 AM
I strongly oppose this development. My house is directly across the entrance to this subdivision. 4,400 additional cars daily will not allow my front yard to be a safe environment for my 4 children to play. The developer does not care about the Ruggles Ferry community or the negative impacts of 482 houses in a rural farming community. This area will forever be changed. Please deny this concept plan.
July 7, 2021
at 10:24 AM
3-SB-21-C
Nicholas
37923
3-SB-21-C
Nicholas (37923), July 7, 2021 at 10:25 AM
This development does not fit the area. The safety and infrastructure surrounding the development is also inadequate.
July 7, 2021
at 10:25 AM
3-SB-21-C
Victoria
37871
3-SB-21-C
Victoria (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:36 AM
I respectfully and earnestly ask you to vote no to this subdivision plan. Our quiet rural community with it's small country roads cannot handle this enormous development.
July 7, 2021
at 10:36 AM
7-I-21-RZ
Michael
37932
7-I-21-RZ
Michael (37932), July 7, 2021 at 10:43 AM
Will hillside protection be adhered to if this proposal is approved? Will water pressure, already at a minimum, be affected? It would seem logical that the development of this property should adhere to the same restrictions of the Black Forest subdivision (zoned PR) which is right next door to this property.
July 7, 2021
at 10:43 AM
3-SB-21-C
Winston
37924
3-SB-21-C
Winston (37924), July 7, 2021 at 11:05 AM
I attended a community meeting last night and was updated on the proposed Innsbruck development project. I am appalled at the lack of cooperation this developer and property owner have given the Ruggles Ferry Community Association in working at making this a reasonable development. 475 homes crammed onto 175 acres is outrageous anywhere in the rural settings of Knox County. The track is 200 acres so when you take out the 15 to 25 acres of land for the roads, park, setbacks, infrastructure, and common property that will reduce the buildable land to 175 acres. That puts the development at almost 3 homes to the acre which is no where compatible to the surrounding community.

Also, another very troubling aspect of this high density development is the additional traffic that will be created. The roads in the area are already stressed and at times dangerous. A more reasonable less dense plan is needed so it will be compatible to the rural area.

Please consider these factors, and the stress and burden this development will put on the community when deciding on this development and reject the Innsbruck plan.

July 7, 2021
at 11:05 AM
3-SB-21-C
Patricia
37924
3-SB-21-C
Patricia (37924), July 7, 2021 at 11:18 AM
I have sent a letter in opposition to rezoning. I still oppose it.
July 7, 2021
at 11:18 AM
3-SB-21-C
Cris
37924
3-SB-21-C
Cris (37924), July 7, 2021 at 11:24 AM
This project doesn't fit the Ruggles Ferry area and will create many problems for the hundreds that live on and around Ruggles Ferry Road. There is no subdivision anywhere like this project within the surrounding area. The closest subdivisions are no where this dense. The subdivision to the east is one home per acre and the development to the west are homes om 5-10 acres.

When you consider the lack of compatibility with the area, the environmental runoff into the river, the traffic congestion it will create, and the overall negative impact this 200 acre development will have on the nearly 6,000 acre Ruggles Ferry Community the plan should be denied.

Please reject the Innsbruck Farms development.
July 7, 2021
at 11:24 AM
3-SB-21-C
kevin
37871
3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:25 AM
As a resident of the area where this development is proposed, I ask that this development not be approved in it's currently proposed plan. The housing density would be the highest in Knox County and seriously out of character with the surrounding area. It's a high-density island planted in a low-density (mostly farmland) area. It will more that triple by estimates the amount of traffic on Ruggles Ferry, not to mention the alternate access roads that were not even considered in the traffic study done. The real estate, financing, and construction industries are well represented on the commission. What I am asking is that you put aside business relationships and try to look at this from the perspective of those of us who live in this area. We've invested a lot in the homes and land we have. Many of us escaped west Knoxville and this development will bring it to our doorstep. Listen to our voices.If you won't listen to us, listen to the Knoxville Board of Realtors which has given an opinion that this development is not needed in this area at this time. Give us something we can live with. Give us the park the 2017 plan (https://archive.knoxplanning.org/plans/smallarea/east_county_2017.pdf) told us we would get. Don't give us 482 (or 480) homes surrounded by our low density neighborhood.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707112512.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 11:25 AM
3-SB-21-C
Julia
37871
3-SB-21-C
Julia (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:26 AM
See attached letter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707112632.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 11:26 AM
3-SB-21-C
Jason R. “Rocky”
37764
3-SB-21-C
Jason R. “Rocky” (37764), July 7, 2021 at 11:34 AM
Please do not approve this request for the Innsbruck development. Please DENY!!! Our current infrastructures are not adequate for the safety of our community members not to mention the environmental impacts on the River access. 10 years ago we (East Knox County Community) were promised community parks. This property would be a great asset for our community as a park with River front access and its natural beauty. Invest in our community like you have South Knoxville Urban wilderness and Baker’s creek projects. I am for development but it must reflect our community. The Innsbruck Farms plan does not reflect our population or our community, however, 100 homes with larger lots and a park would enhance our community, make it safer for our children and families. This development is to dense for this are. I respectfully ask for each of you NOT TO APPROVE THIS PLAN.
July 7, 2021
at 11:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
Ashley
37871
3-SB-21-C
Ashley (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:34 AM
As a member of the community I ask that you deny this request. If you simply take a short drive down Ruggles Ferry you will see the signs of opposition. We as a community stand behind those who live on Ruggles Ferry that would be directly impacted. The deleterious effect of this build will spread throughout our small, rural area affecting our schools, roads and the safety of our community. I ask that you deny.
July 7, 2021
at 11:34 AM
3-SB-21-C
Donna
3
3-SB-21-C
Donna ( 3), July 7, 2021 at 11:35 AM
I am requesting that you deny the building of this property because of the large number of houses proposed and the impact of the volume of traffic on Ruggles Ferry and auxiliary roads. The developers don’t seem to take this seriously because they only offered to reduce the number from 482 to 475. We do not object new housing in our area but only the large number concentrated in this particular development. The access would also be better if it were not directly off Ruggles Ferry but from Burris/Blake. Please vote deny on behalf of the citizens who will be directly affected by all the added traffic.
July 7, 2021
at 11:35 AM
3-SB-21-C
Johnnie
3780
3-SB-21-C
Johnnie ( 3780), July 7, 2021 at 11:48 AM
Please stop this madness!!! Ruffles Ferry can not carry all the added traffic.
July 7, 2021
at 11:48 AM
3-SB-21-C
Darrell
37871
3-SB-21-C
Darrell (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM
I oppose this development due to the negative impact on our community infrastructure and resources.
July 7, 2021
at 11:52 AM
3-SB-21-C
Tamera
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tamera (37871), July 7, 2021 at 11:55 AM
I strongly oppose the current development plan of Innsbruck Farms. Please deny this request because it is the desire of the members of this community! Thank you!
July 7, 2021
at 11:55 AM
3-SB-21-C
Mary
37764
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37764), July 7, 2021 at 12:01 PM
We need the committee to DENY 3-SB-21-C Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan! We DON'T want 475 homes in our neighborhood, we don't want the additional traffic on our rural roads, we don't want 10 YEARS of construction. We want to maintain our rural, country characteristic. We’re urging for denial on 3-SB-21C.
July 7, 2021
at 12:01 PM
3-SB-21-C
Mary
37764
3-SB-21-C
Mary (37764), July 7, 2021 at 12:01 PM
We need the committee to DENY 3-SB-21-C Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan! We DON'T want 475 homes in our neighborhood, we don't want the additional traffic on our rural roads, we don't want 10 YEARS of construction. We want to maintain our rural, country characteristic. We’re urging for denial on 3-SB-21C. Thank you!
July 7, 2021
at 12:01 PM
3-SB-21-C
Trecia
379
3-SB-21-C
Trecia ( 379), July 7, 2021 at 12:03 PM
Innsbruck Farms Development needs to be denied. This plan in no way fits into the nature of this community. This area is zoned for Low Density Residential. Innsbruck does not fit.People choose to live on this community for its rural, low density,and low traffic nature. The traffic problems and changes necessary to fix those problems are going to drastically change the quality of life people in this community want, and not for the better. Please put yourself in the position of these community members. Would you want your quality of living to change as it is going to change for us. Deny this plan.
July 7, 2021
at 12:03 PM
3-SB-21-C
Trecia
3-SB-21-C
Trecia July 7, 2021 at 12:05 PM
Deny this plan.
July 7, 2021
at 12:05 PM
3-SB-21-C
Jodie
37914
3-SB-21-C
Jodie (37914), July 7, 2021 at 12:05 PM
This plan is absurd & I strongly disagree with it. I don't see how our roads and schools could manage an influx of housing & people of this magnitude in one isolated area, not to mention the impact that construction for that length of time could cause. We are a small rural community and one whose majority of members moved to and/or grew up enjoying the area BECAUSE of its lack of crowding and loss of natural landscape caused by massive neighborhood developments, such as this. I hope that the committee listens to the people that this will impact and denies the plan.
July 7, 2021
at 12:05 PM
3-SB-21-C
Tammie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Tammie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:08 PM
Please deny the Innsbruck Development application. The area roads could not handle the large volume of traffic that would be generated with the proposed development and would have a negative impact in this community.
July 7, 2021
at 12:08 PM
3-SB-21-C
Catherine
37871
3-SB-21-C
Catherine (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:10 PM
This proposed plan is not in the best interest of our community nor is it in alignment with the current infrastructure. The size and scope of this plan would over extend our schools, roadways, and is much larger than desired. There are other subdivisions within our community than can easily fulfill any housing needs that this plan would strive to meet. There is however an apparent need for homes of similar size and style to what is already in place in and around Ruggles Ferry.
July 7, 2021
at 12:10 PM
3-SB-21-C
Trent
37871
3-SB-21-C
Trent (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:25 PM
The Innsbruck Farms Concept Plan would be detrimental to the Ruggles Ferry/Carter area. 475 houses? The traffic increase, noise pollution to the residents in that immediate area, along with the fact that this huge increase in homes will greatly reduce the current rural living we so enjoy.PLEASE don't accept this plan!!!! While the housing market is in need for more homes, this is NOT the place to add them!
July 7, 2021
at 12:25 PM
3-SB-21-C
Amanda
37871
3-SB-21-C
Amanda (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM
Please deny the approval of Innsbruck Farms subdivision. My family moved to Shackleford Lane in October. The country setting, wildlife and serenity were exactly what we were looking for. Adding the subdivision would take away the entire reason everyone in this area loves it. By adding the subdivision you will destroy the country setting and force wildlife to leave. Please do not turn this area into city living. Thank you!
July 7, 2021
at 12:26 PM
3-SB-21-C
Christopher
37871
3-SB-21-C
Christopher (37871), July 7, 2021 at 12:30 PM
Please deny the approval for the Innsbruck Farms subdivision. By approving this, you will be destroying the reason the current residents love. The area is currently set up as a country setting, but this will turn the area into city living. Please say no to this subdivision. Thank you!
July 7, 2021
at 12:30 PM
3-SB-21-C
Kylie
37871
3-SB-21-C
Kylie (37871), July 7, 2021 at 1:08 PM
I would like to oppose the recovery center in the Carter community. This is too close to the surrounding schools and there is no access to public transportation from this location. This is not a successful location for this facility.
July 7, 2021
at 1:08 PM
7-A-21-SU
Jeff
37917
7-A-21-SU
Jeff (37917), July 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM
No parking for cars to mean kids coming that way from school I don't think it would be a good idea or a safe place to have a store there
July 7, 2021
at 1:22 PM
3-SB-21-C
P
37871
3-SB-21-C
P (37871), July 7, 2021 at 1:39 PM
Please do Not allow this on Ruggles Ferry. This is Way Too Many houses in such a small space. It's not the subdivision that we are opposing, but the number of houses. The lots Have to be bigger!! Please do not approve this
July 7, 2021
at 1:39 PM
7-H-21-RZ
Barbara
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Barbara (37920), July 7, 2021 at 1:59 PM
I am writing to express opposition to the proposed zoning changes for the apartment complex development at the corner of Maloney Road and Alcoa Highway. My full comments are in the attached pdf file.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707135922.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 1:59 PM
7-A-21-UR
Attie
37918
7-A-21-UR
Attie (37918), July 7, 2021 at 2:43 PM
Please see the attached document.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210707144301.pdf
July 7, 2021
at 2:43 PM
7-A-21-UR
Glenda
37777
7-A-21-UR
Glenda (37777), July 7, 2021 at 2:45 PM
I understand that the people making the complaint don’t want changes made in their neighborhood. These people had the option to purchase said property to run and make changes or not. It doesn’t seem to me that with no addition to traffic and as long as they stay within their boundaries that their complaints have any validity.
July 7, 2021
at 2:45 PM
3-SB-21-C
TERESA
37871
3-SB-21-C
TERESA (37871), July 7, 2021 at 3:57 PM
I oppose this plan!! It negatively impacts the rural character of the community and there is no way that Ruggles Ferry Road can handle the traffic! The schools, grocery stores, restaurants, etc. are very limited in our area and are not capable of handling the influx of people and are at max capacity as it is. Please deny this plan!!!
July 7, 2021
at 3:57 PM
3-SB-21-C
Vicki
37871
3-SB-21-C
Vicki (37871), July 7, 2021 at 4:05 PM
Innsbruck FARMS?!!! What a lie. There is nothing FARM about this other than the highest dollar yield possible from that 200 acres. This development would destroy the remaining family farms and change the beautiful face of the Ruggles Ferry community FOREVER. Don't let GREED govern! Don't let them turn east Knox county into another West Knoxville. PLEASE deny this plan.
July 7, 2021
at 4:05 PM
7-A-21-UR
MK
37917
7-A-21-UR
MK (37917), July 7, 2021 at 7:20 PM
I can’t imagine that anyone would have objections about what Paws with Badges does. To give veterans fully trained and certified service animals for PTSD is the work of an Angel. It’s absurd that someone would choose to attempt to undermine the work this organization does. On top of that work, B&B K9 does so much for the community and it’s dog owners. My golden retriever was attacked and turned into a different dog overnight and Mike helped get his anxiety and reactivity under control. BOTH organization’s change lives and give back to our local community. To take legal action on such selfless work is unacceptable!
July 7, 2021
at 7:20 PM
3-SB-21-C
Lee Ann
37871
3-SB-21-C
Lee Ann (37871), July 7, 2021 at 7:42 PM
I strongly oppose the approval of the Innsbruck Subdivision due to the high volume of traffic it will put on the main road which is Ruggles Ferry. We are looking at up to potentially 800-1,000 more cars per day traveling to and from work, and the road is extremely narrow and curvy. The connecting roads to Asheville Highway, (Burris, Cash, and Woodale), are also extremely narrow and have blind hills on at least two of the roads.

I am also very concerned about the run-off into the Holston River from the subdivision. I do not want to destroy the natural beauty of the river, or the wildlife in and around the river. The dense population of the new subdivision will greatly affect the habitats of the wildlife in our area.

Finally, this subdivision is proposed as the largest subdivision in Knox County and will send a high volume of students to The Carter Middle and High school, Chilhowee school, and Sunnyview school. Overcrowding of schools is never considered when developments go in, and as a school teacher I see the results of poor planning first hand.

Please vote to "DENY" this proposed subdivision in our area.
July 7, 2021
at 7:42 PM
7-A-21-SU
Timmy
37912
7-A-21-SU
Timmy (37912), July 7, 2021 at 9:29 PM
Just concerned with it being super close to a middle school, also no stops signs and definitely not enough parking. It would just become a hangout spot for the kids after school who walk and they will end up standing out there doing bad things and stealing from the store as well. Safety of the kids should come first. This building would be better as something else besides another convient store we have plenty of them on this road.
July 7, 2021
at 9:29 PM
7-A-21-UR
Brittany
37871
7-A-21-UR
Brittany (37871), July 7, 2021 at 10:39 PM
I just wanted to say what a wonderful ministry Mike and Amanda Bartleson provide to the community with their Dog training facility, B&B K9 and their non profit, Paws and Badges. This truly is Mike's calling. He truly cares for all the dogs and their families. He has trained my dog and helped my family so much! Please please research what they do and hear them out. Please work with them so they can continue to minister to our wonderful community!
July 7, 2021
at 10:39 PM
7-A-21-UR
Jeanne
37918
7-A-21-UR
Jeanne (37918), July 7, 2021 at 10:59 PM
As a resident of said neighborhood this denial is unreasonable and detrimental to our community. Along E. Emory Rd between Maynardville Hwy and Tazewell Pike there are numerous businesses both stand alone and adjacent to the owner’s residence. The designation of LDR has not been adhered to in previous cases. There is currently under construction 2 housing developments within a mile of B&B K-9 one being 91 townhomes, the other 65 homes. B&B K-9 provides our community with service much needed for responsible dog owners who want their pets to be good citizens. Please approve B&B K-9’s business to remain open.
July 7, 2021
at 10:59 PM
7-A-21-UR
Cheryl
37932
7-A-21-UR
Cheryl (37932), July 8, 2021 at 1:27 AM
Please see attachment below.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708012715.pdf
July 8, 2021
at 1:27 AM
3-SB-21-C
Aaron
N/A
3-SB-21-C
Aaron (N/A), July 8, 2021 at 9:38 AM
Attached is a figure showing where the County would request sidewalk internal to this development.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708093832.pdf
July 8, 2021
at 9:38 AM
7-A-21-UR
Kim
37924
7-A-21-UR
Kim (37924), July 8, 2021 at 9:53 AM
Please see attachment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708095331.pdf
July 8, 2021
at 9:53 AM
7-C-21-RZ
Kevin
37923
7-C-21-RZ
Kevin (37923), July 8, 2021 at 10:07 AM
We have grave concerns about this property being developed due to:

* This property is just above us

* Heavy Construction Vehicles going back and forth on Nubbin Ridge during construction/development of said property

* The building[s] that will be built especially their foundation[s.]

* The additional infrastructure (electric, sewage, natural gas, etc.)

* The additional vehicular traffic on Nubbin Ridge

We tried to have the trees that appeared dead immediately above our property cut down; but we missed at least one as:

We had a tree fall thru our master bedroom and bath on March 29, 2020, just before 6 AM, fortunately no one was hurt; but the damage to our house was so extensive that even the Red Cross came out and offered us shelter. Hopefully the pictures in the attachment will illustrate what happened.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708100724.pdf
July 8, 2021
at 10:07 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Mary D.
37920
7-H-21-RZ
Mary D. (37920), July 8, 2021 at 10:47 AM
We are opposed to the proposed re-zoning and apartment complex at Maloney Road adjacent to Sevier Heights Baptist Church. See attached letter.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708104710.pdf
July 8, 2021
at 10:47 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Sean
37919
7-H-21-RZ
Sean (37919), July 8, 2021 at 11:21 AM
Please see attached applicant update on project concept and communication with neighborhood.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708112130.pdf
July 8, 2021
at 11:21 AM
7-H-21-RZ
Sean
37919
7-H-21-RZ
Sean (37919), July 8, 2021 at 11:21 AM
Please see attached applicant update on project concept and communication with neighborhood.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708112134.pdf
July 8, 2021
at 11:21 AM
7-A-21-UR
Samantha
37971
7-A-21-UR
Samantha (37971), July 8, 2021 at 12:58 PM
Not only does Paws and Badges save lives, but Mike and Amanda are the people I'd personally HOPE to have as neighbors with dogs- they know exactly how to own, train, and handle dogs of all personalities and to do so in a safe and secure way. I have learned so much from all of the employees of BnB K9 during training sessions with my dog, and I've found myself in turn passing on many of those lessons to help new dog owners I meet elsewhere. This family and this organization is not only beneficial to the community, but it is essential. Some of us have dogs that are stigmatized because of their breed, and so to find people so welcoming and ready to train them and love them is not always easy. Mike and Amanda know that all dogs, no matter how neurotic/anxious/etc., can be helped and have proven that time and time again. Please consider the horrible impact that this decision would have on countless humans and dogs in the community.
July 8, 2021
at 12:58 PM
3-SB-21-C
Daniel
3-SB-21-C
Daniel Submitted during the meeting
attachment provided during the July, 2021, meeting
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20211130090837.pdf
Submitted during the meeting