September 9, 2021
Planning Commission meeting
Planning Commission meeting
Public Comments
92 Comments for
9-A-20-SC
Cody August 26, 2020 at 11:02 AM
I received a notice of Planning Commission about a being built next door to me. I do not want this to happen. It will depreciate my property value. Please don't let this happen. This is a family subdivision. I have lived here for 20 years. This street can't handle the extra traffic.Cody August 26, 2020 at 11:02 AM
Jay
37919
37919
9-A-20-AC
Jay (37919), September 4, 2020 at 6:33 AM
I'm a resident at 3718 Cate Avenue and president of the Marble City Neighborhood Association. Along with several residents that I have spoken to, I am very concerned about 9-A-20-AC and 9-A-20-SC. The owner is trying to close an alley and a road with this request, but they indicate in the request that they are consolidating several properties, and, according to the person who was working on the property, the goal is to then turn it over to a developer to build apartments. The areas owned by the applicant are zoned RN-2 and RN-1. So, it really should not be allowed. I have several objections in addition to the fact that the zoning should not allow a consolidation of lots and building of apartments, namely: 1- A large development of apartments would radically transform the character of this neighborhood, and not for the better- 2- it introduces significantly more traffic and 3- typically transient people who are not as likely to be invested in this neighborhood and what we're trying to build as a neighborhood association. 4- The area floods regularly. I've lived in the neighborhood for over 12 years and have seen 3rd Creek flood several times in that time period, two of which times were very severe, one time a house in the area and the little church along Pilkay were severely flooded and the house had to be rebuilt, and the other time, a car was swept down Pilkay and slammed into a street sign on Pilkay and Dance Ave, adjacent to this development. 5- The roads are very narrow and people already drive way too fast along those roads, and at least one young person in the neighborhood has been struck by a car very near this proposed development. I would like to speak at the meeting when this is discussed and at least one other resident would like to as well. I'll be communicating details of this with folks in our neighborhood so several others will hopefully attend and/or speak on Sept 10th. I can be most easily reached at 865-200-7662. Or, I can be reached by email at marblecityneighborhood@gmail.com. Please don't let this project proceed as planned. When neighbors first talked to the owner, the plan was to build duplexes, but that has apparently changed radically, and the new development plans are very undesirable to this neighborhood. Thanks!Jay (37919), September 4, 2020 at 6:33 AM
Jacob
37912
37912
9-A-20-AC
Jacob (37912), September 12, 2020 at 10:21 AM
I'm a resident at 1204 Harmony Lane and noticed the knox planning sign at a vacant property on our street. After reviewing the special request and plan with the property, I am against this special request for a multi family home. There are multiple reasons for my choice; first: increased traffic down the street. I already have an issue with vehicles turning around in my driveway and degrading it. The increased traffic could lead to increased maintenance costs on my end.Jacob (37912), September 12, 2020 at 10:21 AM
Next, I worry about lacking background checks and vetting of tenants: our street had a large issue with the previous residents of 1218 Harmony Lane dealing drugs. Ever since they moved out over a year ago, we've had zero issues with crime or suspicious individuals snooping on properties.
Lastly, the request of two driveways, and the size of the planned building, will be an eyesore on the street. This would be a large two-story building, and every other house on the street is a single-floor house. I feel that this will impact the value of all the houses on the street negatively.
I've spoken to multiple neighbors on our street, and all are against this special use permit. I have encouraged them to email you before the next hearing on November 12th.
Thank you for your time.
Applicant
7-SA-21-C
Applicant Correspondence
July 8, 2021 at 9:35 AM
Please read attached Postponement Request.Applicant Correspondence
July 8, 2021 at 9:35 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210708093547.pdf
applicant
Robert
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Robert (37849), July 22, 2021 at 3:55 PM
See attached .pdfRobert (37849), July 22, 2021 at 3:55 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210722155548.pdf
8-G-21-RZ
Harry July 26, 2021 at 8:39 AM
My property is adjacent to 4114 W. Beaver Creek. I have some concerns with the proposed rezoning. Water drainage is a major issue with my property and most of the neighborhood. There are several houses on Evanel Way with drainage ditches that go all the way back to the W. Beaver Creek property, one is a side of my house. On the other side of my house, the water flows like a small creek and floods Evanel Way. I have pictures that document that document that the majority of that water comes from the W. Beaver Creek property and will attach them to this email. Many of our houses on Evanel Way require the use of sump pumps in our crawl spaces to prevent standing water under our homes, and mosquitos are an issue because my back yard stays mushy wet after a hard rain. My concern is that excavation and construction on the W. Beaver Creek property will exacerbate the already substantial issues we are having with water drainage here on Evanel Way and attempts to solve the problems with retention ponds wouldn't solve the issues but would make more problems with mosquitos.Harry July 26, 2021 at 8:39 AM
My next concern is a potential safety hazard, as traffic would be entering and exiting the property via W. Beaver Creek Drive at a blind hill. There is already a flashing warning light and restricted view sign at that area because of the existing roadway hazard. As you know W. Beaver Creek Drive is heavily traveled as it connects Clinton and Oak Ridge highways. Children frequently congregate at the ball field off this road, making the potential much more dangerous in my opinion.
My final concern is the number of dwells per acres. The number of proposed units is not comparable to the surrounding community. I fear this would contribute to further overcrowding of our schools.
Linda
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Linda (37849), July 27, 2021 at 1:25 PM
I live in Lazy Acres subdivision at noted address. The entire subdivision water drains through my property. When I moved here 20 years ago the county would come periodically and dredge the drainage ditch to help the water flow better. This hasn't happened in years and anytime it rains my front yard becomes a creek. Someone can wash their vehicle, use water for whatever reason and my yard is wet for days. Linda (37849), July 27, 2021 at 1:25 PM
I called a few weeks ago because around the culvert itself had filled up so much water was just overflowing from the top/roadway. They did come but dredged only enough around the pipe for the water to flow through still filtering essentially into my yard.
If we move forward with the planned development the water/drainage situation in our neighborhood and my yard is going to be effected greatly. The values of my property and others in this subdivision is going to be greatly impacted even more so than it is already.
I'm happy for anyone to walk through our neighborhood and view the drainage situation at any time.
John
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
John (37849), July 28, 2021 at 10:59 AM
Regarding rezoning of 4114 West Beaver Creek, the developer "Nelson Farm Development LLC" will meet with interested neighbors tomorrow evening, July 29, 2021 at 6:30 at 7249 Evanel Way in Lazy Acres Subdivision. We will meet to share the developer's vision for the property under consideration and to take neighbor input and questions. We look forward to meeting interested neighbors there.John (37849), July 28, 2021 at 10:59 AM
8-G-21-RZ
Cathy July 28, 2021 at 2:44 PM
It was recently brought to our attention that a subdivision might be built before our subdivision on west beaver creek. Cathy July 28, 2021 at 2:44 PM
If this happens it will destroy my home and my neighbors. My home and the ones next to me are the lowest in the subdivision. The excessive storm water that flows from the area they want to build on. The water just about comes to my home. The hydrostatic pressure from the water flow causes flooding in one corner of my crawl space not to mention the numerous water problems that my neighbor has from this. The water amount is so much that when it's not excessively hot out the water just soaks and pools and we can't use our yard.
Please don't allow these people to make worse what is already bad. This will not only destroy my home but my neighbors.
8-G-21-RZ
RICHARD July 29, 2021 at 1:39 PM
i live in Lazy Acres sub division. If i am looking at the map correct this property is behind my house. Our sub division has no draining it all goes in the street and down to W Beaver creek. If more houses are built behind us where is water going? How is this going to effect Powell Park ball fields on the other side.RICHARD July 29, 2021 at 1:39 PM
8-G-21-RZ
RICHARD July 30, 2021 at 3:13 PM
i live in Lazy Acres sub division. If i am looking at the map correct this property is behind my house. Our sub division has no draining it all goes in the street and down to W Beaver creek. If more houses are built behind us where is water going? How is this going to effect Powell Park ball fields on the other side. RICHARD July 30, 2021 at 3:13 PM
Faith
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Faith (37849), August 1, 2021 at 6:22 PM
I am concerned about someone building houses on the property beside Lazy Acres. We have serious water problems every time it rains and building on that property will cause even more problems. Also, there will be a lot more accidents on Beaver Creek as the entrance to that property is on a hill in a curve. Cars fly up and down Beaver Creek. Please help us keep a subdivision from being built on that site. It would also be appreciated if we could get some assistance on our current water problems, drains of some kind. We are tired of being ignored. This is a really nice subdivision but would be wonderful if the water problems were fixed. Faith (37849), August 1, 2021 at 6:22 PM
Eddie
37923
37923
8-A-21-UR
Eddie (37923), August 1, 2021 at 9:20 PM
I believe the work done on this project is effecting the storm water run off. My property is just down from this project and in all the years I've never had any issues with storm water overrunning my fence. Since this project started, we've had so much water coming down from the worksite that it totally washed out and knocked down my fence. This storm only lasted a few hours. I'm concerned with what will happen when we have several days of rain. Eddie (37923), August 1, 2021 at 9:20 PM
Cory
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Cory (37849), August 3, 2021 at 10:24 AM
I'm writing to you about the rezoning plan for the property on West Beavercreek. I believe this is a bad idea for a number of reasons. Extra water runoff into our subdivision which already has an excess water problem with the slightest rainfall, extra traffic on W Beavercreek, esthetics of our neighborhood would be ruined, possibility of crime in our area, destruction of habitat for many animals, and an influx of mosquitos due to planned retention ponds. Please consider all this when you vote.Cory (37849), August 3, 2021 at 10:24 AM
Kim
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Kim (37932), August 4, 2021 at 12:26 PM
On behalf of Hardin Valley Planning Advocates we would like to offer our support of the staff recommendations in regards to the need to plan for future improvements of Hardin Valley Rd. We respectfully ask for consideration to the reduction in the number of lots from 18 to 17 to minimize possible disturbance to future land owner(s) and eliminate potential acquisition costs to the county.Kim (37932), August 4, 2021 at 12:26 PM
Staff Recommendation: The applicant requesting various reductions in standards so the proposed road and lot arrangement work for this site. As explained below, the combination of these requests is problematic because of the need to expand Hardin Valley Road in the near future and the probable need for Knox County to purchase and tear down the house on lot 18 if it is built too close to the Hardin Valley Road frontage.
7-SA-21-C
Wanda ( ), August 4, 2021 at 6:53 PM
As a resident in Massey Creek I would like to offer my support of the staff recommendations in regards to the need to plan for future improvements of Hardin Valley Road. Therefore, I'm respectively requesting consideration to the reduction of lots - from 18 to 17. This recommendation demonstrates great foresight to the needs of this area.Wanda ( ), August 4, 2021 at 6:53 PM
Richard
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Richard (37849), August 5, 2021 at 8:33 PM
This is to oppose the rezoning at 4114 W. Beaver Creek (8-G-21-RZ) Nelson Farm Development. Our property backs up to the property at 4114 W. Beaver Creek. Putting in 40 homes on this 8 acre property will destroy the homes in Lazy Acres with water. The contractor said they would put in 2 retention ponds to keep water off of us but with that many homes it will create disaster for those of us who own in Lazy Acres. We already have a water problem from where the county put in Levi Field. Most of the homes in Lazy Acres had to put pumps under their house and if they put 40 homes in that space it will create even more problems regarding water that the county says there is not "fix" for. It will add additional traffic on already busy side road. We have had three deaths in the area of Lazy Acres. There is a blind hill both directions as you pull out on W. Beaver. We strongly appose this rezoning.Richard (37849), August 5, 2021 at 8:33 PM
Christina
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Christina (37849), August 6, 2021 at 11:00 AM
I am longtime resident of Evanel Way, my property directly connects to the 8 acres located at 4114 W Beaver Creek which is up for review to be rezoned. I fail to see any "need" to rezone this property from agricultural to planed residential. I do not feel this location is right for a development as I do not see that is promotes the general welfare of our community in any way. The development will increase our already bad flooding issues, is not in keeping with the look of our neighborhood, and that it will add to the bad traffic problems and regular accidents we already face. Please see my comments in the attachment. Christina (37849), August 6, 2021 at 11:00 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210806110000.pdf
Danielle
37931
37931
8-A-21-UR
Danielle (37931), August 6, 2021 at 6:14 PM
Many comments have already been submitted about this area, and it's drainage issues. Residents in the area commented that it would be a very bad idea to remove trees that were providing erosion control as well and rip drainage for lower elevations farther South. I believe the problems have already begun, in that earlier Concerns were ignored and trees were removed. Residents of Hardwick and Meadcrest are already experiencing flooding issues. As well since the erosion control of this area is no longer in place, the westside of a parking lot the borders this property for Walker Springs apartments is beginning to noticeably sink and cracks and holes develop as the soil underneath has begun to sink. As the trees in the area that were providing stability for the soil are no longer there. No real Ideas how to fix this, as I feel the damage has already been inflicted on the community and the area, And these problems will only get worse as time it's time passes by. In addition Kama flooding on the Knoxville Greenway O Greenway has worsened, as the Knoxville Greenway is South and lower of this entire area and the drainage is spilling out onto the Greenway.. The damage has been done at this pointDanielle (37931), August 6, 2021 at 6:14 PM
Paul
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Paul (37932), August 8, 2021 at 2:38 PM
I am writing in support of the staff recommendations for the subdivision concept plan 7-SA-21-C. Responsible planning along this section of Hardin Valley Road is desperately needed as the proposed number of homes already approved will have significant impact on the traffic, school system and environment. I would also like to advocate declining requested variance #2 so the tree line along Mission Hill is given a better chance to survive construction and thrive after the disturbance to the environment. Paul (37932), August 8, 2021 at 2:38 PM
Staff Recommendation: The applicant requesting various reductions in standards so the proposed road and lot arrangement work for this site. As explained below, the combination of these requests is problematic because of the need to expand Hardin Valley Road in the near future and the probable need for Knox County to purchase and tear down the house on lot 18 if it is built too close to the Hardin Valley Road frontage
Jaime
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Jaime (37932), August 9, 2021 at 2:02 PM
I am writing to you in reference of the development plan for 7-SA-21-C proposed by Scott Smith Properties. The owner of this company is also a member of your board. It is very concerning that his company would propose a development that would cause your staff to include the following comment "The applicant is requesting various reductions in standards to make the proposed road and lot arrangement work for this site. " I would think a member of your board would not be trying to make exceptions, but instead propose developments that would be best for the land being developed and its surroundings. No wonder we have the issues we have in Hardin Valley. Jaime (37932), August 9, 2021 at 2:02 PM
Every month your board hears countless testimonials both in person and by submitted comments that discuss the overdevelopment of the Hardin Valley area. We all know Hardin Valley road will need to be widened in the near future to accommodate the additional homes being built each day. Please do not allow lot 18 to be included in the plan. Why build a home when we know it will become an issue when this road is updated in the near future. I am in no way against growth, but lets be smart about what we are approving moving forward.
Gene
37921
37921
8-G-21-RZ
Gene (37921), August 9, 2021 at 4:46 PM
Our family property borders the entire back property line of 4114 W. Beaver Creek Dr, 8-G-21-RZ. We are concerned with water drainage just like the people in Lazy Acres. Traffic will also increase within the surrounding roads.Gene (37921), August 9, 2021 at 4:46 PM
Edward
37931
37931
7-SA-21-C
Edward (37931), August 9, 2021 at 7:42 PM
I believe the number of lots should be reduced from 18 to 17 to allow for the widening of Hardin Valley Rd. Edward (37931), August 9, 2021 at 7:42 PM
Debra
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Debra (37932), August 9, 2021 at 9:06 PM
I support the request to reduce the lot size from 18 to anything lesser. This area is being decimated and cannot sustain this. Enough already!Debra (37932), August 9, 2021 at 9:06 PM
Sarah
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Sarah (37932), August 10, 2021 at 12:26 PM
STOP BUILDING MORE SUBDIVISIONS!!!! WE ARE ALREADY OVER CROWDED AT THE SCHOOLS AND ON THE ROADS. THAT IS RUINING WHAT MAKES HARDIN VALLEY SO GREAT, THE COUNTRYSIDE AND SOMEWHAT SMALLER CLASSES. NOW IT IS HECTIC AND I HAVE TO LEAVE MY HOUSE WHICH IS LITTERALLY 5 MINUTES FROM THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AT 650 IN THE MORNING JUST TO MAKE SURE MY KIDS GET TO SCHOOL ON TIME (KEY WORDS, ON TIME! NOT EARLY). WHICH IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS!!!!!! WIDEN THE ROADS BEFORE YOU PUT MORE SUBDIVISIONS IN!!!! Sarah (37932), August 10, 2021 at 12:26 PM
Tyler
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Tyler (37849), August 10, 2021 at 8:43 PM
See attached documentTyler (37849), August 10, 2021 at 8:43 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210810204302.pdf
Katherine
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Katherine (37932), August 10, 2021 at 8:53 PM
In reference of the development plan for 7-SA-21-C proposed by Scott Smith Properties; the owner of this company is also a member of your board. It is very concerning that his member would propose a development that would as for various exceptions to be made to guidelines for the area. Hardin Valley has been over built. Our infrastructure cannot support another Subdivision. Our schools are over crowded, there are too many cars and buses in an area not designed for the volume. Our road needs to be widened before any build should occur. As a planning commission, focus should be on the addition of a public library, a playground, community center, and other areas to promote the community, not putting money in the hands of builders. We moved to Hardin Valley because of it's farm like feel. Now that's gone, we consider moving out regularly. We no longer promote the area as a good place to live--because it isn't. Katherine (37932), August 10, 2021 at 8:53 PM
Brian
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Brian (37932), August 11, 2021 at 3:48 AM
As resident of Hardin Valley, I would like to offer my support of the staff recommendations in regards to the need to plan for future improvements of Hardin Valley Rd. I respectfully ask for consideration to the reduction in the number of lots from 18 to 17 to minimize possible disturbance to future land owner(s) and eliminate potential acquisition costs to the county.Brian (37932), August 11, 2021 at 3:48 AM
Staff Recommendation: The applicant requesting various reductions in standards so the proposed road and lot arrangement work for this site. As explained below, the combination of these requests is problematic because of the need to expand Hardin Valley Road in the near future and the probable need for Knox County to purchase and tear down the house on lot 18 if it is built too close to the Hardin Valley Road frontage.
Debra
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Debra (37932), August 11, 2021 at 10:49 AM
Hardin Valley Road need to be restructured by widening. The growth of our community is too fast to keep up with. If you build a lot within the boarded of the road I fear the house will delay any expansion plans that need to happen. Hardin Valley schools and transportation/roads need to be a focus prior to any further residential and/apt approvals. Our schools can't handle much more. The elementary school has the entire 2nd grade classes in pods this year. How are new sub divisions even getting approved?!?! Focus on the community not the almighty dollar. Our kids deserve better!Debra (37932), August 11, 2021 at 10:49 AM
Mike
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Mike (37932), August 11, 2021 at 12:38 PM
Comments are included in attached pdf file. Bottom line is that I'm concerned that safety and planning are being sacrificed in by allowing lots that will almost certainly interfere with needed infrastructure upgrades and allowing access to Hardin Valley with Mike (37932), August 11, 2021 at 12:38 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210811123800.pdf
Matthew
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Matthew (37932), August 11, 2021 at 1:06 PM
Please see attached letter. I am asking for denial of this plan and its various exceptions to current rules.Matthew (37932), August 11, 2021 at 1:06 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210811130630.pdf
Tamara
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Tamara (37932), August 11, 2021 at 1:58 PM
My full comments are included in the attached pdf file. My concerns relate to subdivision approval prior to consideration of safety and infrastructure plans to support the increase in population and vehicle traffic. Safety is a key consideration, especially with respect to the very small distance between the proposed entrance and its proximity to the existing Mission Valley Rd intersections with Hardin Valley Road. Tamara (37932), August 11, 2021 at 1:58 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210811135830.pdf
Michele
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Michele (37932), August 11, 2021 at 3:41 PM
I oppose the additional subdivision building due to the already crowded Hardin Valley Rd. I moved to this area to have safety and wide open spaces and greenery. I don not wish this to become as crowded as FarragutMichele (37932), August 11, 2021 at 3:41 PM
Anonymous
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Anonymous (37923), August 11, 2021 at 5:30 PM
What about the safety of the neighborhood children!? Neighborhood safety in general!? A campground in the middle of a neighborhood will only bring trouble. More break ins, child kidnapping, etc. Campgrounds don't belong within city limits. Anonymous (37923), August 11, 2021 at 5:30 PM
Doris
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Doris (37919), August 12, 2021 at 11:15 AM
I am opposed to the closure of the Lakeland ROW closure. The driveway and path lead from Cherokee Blvd to Sequoyah Park. I and other neighbors use this ROW several times a week for quick access to the park. The path is distant from both private properties and does not cause problems to either.Doris (37919), August 12, 2021 at 11:15 AM
Janet
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Janet (37919), August 16, 2021 at 2:25 PM
I oppose this request as a resident of this community and with a house on Lakeland Drive. Many residents use this access point to access the riverside park. It is also a nice connection between Whitlow Park and Sequoyah park. In a time of increasing green spaces and greenways, this is not the time to begin to close off ease of access to these spaces. When I bought my home 20 years ago on Lakeland I did so knowing I would have easy access to the riverside park through this connector. At the very least please consider keeping a greenway or walk way open through this area for established residents. The current owner bought this property knowing where his property lines were. My guess is this is an investor with only an interest in increasing his profits not increasing the value of the neighborhood and his community. I object to this request and beg you deny it.Janet (37919), August 16, 2021 at 2:25 PM
Michael
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Michael (37919), August 16, 2021 at 8:46 PM
I strongly oppose the closure of the Lakeland Drive ROW. The applicant's statement that this ROW is only utilized by the two properties that adjoin this ROW is incorrect. This ROW is, in fact, valuable access to Sequoyah Hills Park which is widely used by not only the residents of Sequoyah Hills but also the entire community. Further, I would encourage the City of Knoxville and TVA to require any encroachments of the ROW and Sequoyah Hills Park be removed immediately.Michael (37919), August 16, 2021 at 8:46 PM
Joshua
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Joshua (37919), August 16, 2021 at 9:54 PM
I am opposed to the Lakeland Dr. row closure. It is a negative for the neighborhood and Sequoyah and Whitlow-Logan parks; this seems to solely benefit the landowners to the detriment of the public.Joshua (37919), August 16, 2021 at 9:54 PM
Cassandra
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Cassandra (37919), August 18, 2021 at 10:15 PM
It is not true that the two adjacent property owners are the only people using this right of way. Numerous neighbors and members of the community use it to get to the park from the Cherokee Blvd Greenway or to connect Whitlow park and Sequoyah park. This neighborhood is full of walkers enjoying our parks. Do not limit our access to our parks!Cassandra (37919), August 18, 2021 at 10:15 PM
Steven
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Steven (37919), August 19, 2021 at 6:58 PM
I am opposed to this request, and assume that most of the nearby residents are as well. The adjacent property owners have the benefit of fronting on a beautiful and well-maintained park that enhances their property and property values. In my experience most property owners in similar circumstances oppose public park access next to their homes, just as many do for public access to the beach if the property is near the ocean. In a broad sense I believe that we have seen that we should never reduce public access to public lands, and the property owners bought the property fully aware of the access adjoining their land.Steven (37919), August 19, 2021 at 6:58 PM
The access point that we are discussing, located at Lakeland and Cherokee, is overgrown and has been poorly maintained by the city. I doubt that many of the nearby residents even realize that this is a public access point. I hope that the current or previous adjacent property owners did not play a role in hiding the access or in keeping it inaccessible, but whether the blame lies with the city's lack of investment or negligence, or with the neighbors, the present overgrown state of maintenance may not fit future plans. As the neighborhood and the city grow this will almost certainly be a necessary asset, so why abandon the property now and require an unpleasant condemnation later?
I hope that you will continue to take the long view, and deny this and similar requests.
Marcia
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Marcia (37919), August 19, 2021 at 8:12 PM
I object to the transfer of this public access to private property. This access is used by many walkers, runners, dog walkers, bicyclists, and others in the neighborhood and from other neighborhoods. This and other similar access routes are beneficial for many users and contribute to the overall value of the neighborhood, not only the immediately adjacent property owners.Marcia (37919), August 19, 2021 at 8:12 PM
Allowing this transfer would also set a precedent. Please do not approve this!
Kimberly
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Kimberly (37919), August 19, 2021 at 10:58 PM
I oppose this closure. I have frequently used this to access the park and avoid the congestion of the parking lots. Kimberly (37919), August 19, 2021 at 10:58 PM
Sara
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Sara (37919), August 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM
I have lived within a few short blocks of this ROW for more than 35 years. The statement in the filing that this ROW property is only used by the two adjacent property owners is grossly incorrect. I use this access 4-10 times per week which for those that can do math- Averages 365 uses per year and a cumulative use of more than 12,700 trips up and down this nice shaded trail over the course of my 35 years in Knoxville. I have been caught in more than one pop-up thunderstorm while out enjoying the wonder of nature, and this speedy shortcut home has been a God-send on many occasions. It is an essential access way and also means of egress to countless citizens and must absolutely remain open. Sara (37919), August 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM
Nicholas
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Nicholas (37919), August 21, 2021 at 3:36 PM
I strongly oppose this proposal. I am a Sequoyah Hills resident. Our family and others use this connector between the two parks. It needs to remain public property and accessible.Nicholas (37919), August 21, 2021 at 3:36 PM
9-C-21-SU
K (37923), August 22, 2021 at 10:31 PM
This is not what we want in our backyard! Having a campground connecting to a city neighborhood would only bring property values down. Having transient type of property usage would also bring down community safety. Knowing our neighbors is important; having people rent a space per night doesn’t foster a sense of safety or community. For this to even be considered is wrong and is not what’s best for our neighborhood. This would also increase the traffic within our community and would allow people with no ties to the community to come and go unnoticed. Please do not let this be approved! K (37923), August 22, 2021 at 10:31 PM
paul
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
paul (37923), August 24, 2021 at 11:31 AM
Access to the property via Amherst is a dangerous hidden drive quality across tracks the other way by Chimney Ridge looks like extending driveway down steep hill along my property adds to the noise we tolerate with railroad nearby. Two tents doesn't sound like but where does this campground project end. I am apposed.paul (37923), August 24, 2021 at 11:31 AM
Susie
37932
37932
9-I-21-RZ
Susie (37932), August 24, 2021 at 4:25 PM
I’ve lived in Hardin Valley for 39 years and the devastation that you are allowing to take place by allowing all the development to take place is a disaster. When will this stop? He schools are overcrowded and the wildlife has nowhere to go. The runoff of the stripping of the land is devastating and taking a toll on our roads. Everybody keeps sayings we need new roads but new roads aren’t going to help if you keep developing and bringing in more traffic. When are you going to stop allowing this? Susie (37932), August 24, 2021 at 4:25 PM
Toni
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Toni (37923), August 24, 2021 at 7:00 PM
Terrible idea! To approve this would not be in the spirit of protecting the community/neighborhood. 2-3 tents leads to more! Where does it stop? Who monitors amount charged, length of stay or vetting campers? Zoned Agricultural property has nothing to do with establishing a campground. While this would be a monetary advantage for the land owner, it would be at the expense of all other nearby property owners. I would dare say that if polled, there isn’t a neighborhood around that would feel comfortable with a campground development within their community. The impact of safety, noise, and aesthetics will be a blow to all nearby. Please ask yourself, would you want a campground in your neighborhood? I have spoken with several other neighbors, and all have been against the idea! If this is somehow approved, the precedent is set for others to follow suite; next time it might just be any of your neighborhoods.Toni (37923), August 24, 2021 at 7:00 PM
Laura
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Laura (37932), August 30, 2021 at 11:10 AM
This development should be restricted to 17 houses to ensure that there is enough space for road widening in the future. The congestion is already significant and with so many approved future developments, road improvements will be required to ensure reasonable access to greater Knoxville.Laura (37932), August 30, 2021 at 11:10 AM
Christina
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Christina (37849), August 30, 2021 at 1:41 PM
please see attached petitionChristina (37849), August 30, 2021 at 1:41 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210830134118.pdf
Victor
37923
37923
9-A-21-RZ
Victor (37923), August 30, 2021 at 5:15 PM
Attached are:Victor (37923), August 30, 2021 at 5:15 PM
1. One of the twelve letters mailed to the immediate neighbors of this 19+ acre tract
2. The enveloped used for the letter
3. The location of the 12 neighbors mailed the information letter
4. KGIS Zoning Map of the area near the 19+ acres (area highlighted in green) showing proximity to the Planned Commercial Area at intersection of Bakertown and Schaad Rd
5. Google Earth Aerial of area near 19+ acres showing Schaad Rd under construction and proposed location for grocery anchored shopping center and pharmacy anchored retail - inside the Planned Commercial Area.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210830171546.pdf
Ian
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Ian (37849), August 31, 2021 at 1:08 PM
There are many issues relating to the re-zoning of this property and subsequent construction of a subdivision. Flooding, negative effect on house prices, negative effect on local community and environment, insufficient local resources to cope with increase in traffic, increased demand on schools, law enforcement and other emergencies services to name but a few. With that being said, there is no more a significant issue than the danger posed by the increased level of volume of traffic along W. Beaver Creek. There have been a number of deaths as a result of road traffic accidents in this short stretch of road, most notable directly opposite the entrance to this proposed subdivision - this tragic occurrence resulted in the death of a minor. Many of these fatalities are recent history, not historic!Ian (37849), August 31, 2021 at 1:08 PM
The inclusion of the subdivision can only increase the danger on a road which has already seen a disproportionate number of fatalities (for the local area, city and county). The decision to put the entrance on W. Beaver Creek (as proposed) is purely made by someone motivated by greed. The building plans as shown pose a direct threat to anyone transiting along this road and this HAS to be recognized by City & County!
Perseverance of life, over greed of individuals (and planners/councilor's) any day!
Mackenzie
37932
37932
9-C-21-UR
Mackenzie (37932), August 31, 2021 at 10:14 PM
I currently live on Mission Hill Lane, part of the Massey Creek Subdivision. I am writing to you because of my concerns of the building plan off of Mission Hill Lane and Hardin Valley Road. The proposed entrance on Mission Hill Lane is at the top of a high slope grade. The sight line is very low and it is very difficult to see traffic coming in and out. Adding another entrance to this road will add further disturbance and safety concerns. Also, with the hopes that some day soon Hardin Valley Road will be widened, the 18th Lot is too close to Hardin Valley Road to accommodate that widening. Also, the slope is a very dangerously high grade. The proposal for the triplexes would not be good for the land, drainage of rain/flood risk. Only 2.6 acres of the Hill Protection area should be used. However, it appears that 100% of the high slope area is going to be a part of the plan. This proposal needs to be addressed with these concerns. Mackenzie (37932), August 31, 2021 at 10:14 PM
Barry
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Barry (37923), September 1, 2021 at 4:08 PM
I agree with the previous comments and oppose this Special Use request. Additional traffic in the neighborhood and daily/weekly rentals is a safety issue for both motorists and residents alike. Not to mention the fact that there is no sewer or drain field planned for these sites so who would confirm proper waste methods were being used. Please help the homeowners stop this request from being approved for the safety of the entire neighborhoods residents and their children.Barry (37923), September 1, 2021 at 4:08 PM
Laura
37932
37932
9-SB-21-C
Laura (37932), September 2, 2021 at 9:48 AM
This proposal is problematic on many fronts. This would be dense housing that is not commensurate with the single family homes in the area and continue to put additional congestion on Hardin Valley Road. A development like this should be closer to where the infrastructure could support the density.Laura (37932), September 2, 2021 at 9:48 AM
Mark
37932
37932
9-SB-21-C
Mark (37932), September 2, 2021 at 9:59 AM
Two aspects of this proposal should be denied. The homes in the surrounding area are all single family homes. The townhouse proposal is inconsistent with the surrounding area and should be DENIED. In addition, the entrance to this development should be from Hardin Valley Rd, perhaps into a roundabout at Marietta Church Rd intersection. The Mission Hill Drive is developed consistent with Massey Creek subdivision, and should remain a dedicated Massey Creek entrance. Moreover, Mission Hill Drive intersection at Hardin Valley is already congested during the day, and the addition of more traffic onto Mission Hill Drive will create a safety concern. Thus, this tie in to Mission Hill Drives should be DENIED.Mark (37932), September 2, 2021 at 9:59 AM
Brad
37932
37932
9-SB-21-C
Brad (37932), September 2, 2021 at 11:01 AM
This proposal is problematic on many fronts. This would be dense housing that is not commensurate with the single family homes in the area and continue to put additional congestion on Hardin Valley Road. A development like this should be closer to where the infrastructure could support the density.Brad (37932), September 2, 2021 at 11:01 AM
Bars
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Bars (37932), September 2, 2021 at 11:03 AM
This proposal is problematic on many fronts. This would be dense housing that is not commensurate with the single family homes in the area and continue to put additional congestion on Hardin Valley Road. A development like this should be closer to where the infrastructure could support the density.Bars (37932), September 2, 2021 at 11:03 AM
Christina
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Christina (37923), September 2, 2021 at 5:51 PM
Summary - I agree with the other public comments in opposing this special use permit.Christina (37923), September 2, 2021 at 5:51 PM
Please see my uploaded PDF where I address the following issues in greater detail - - Likelihood of future expansion (owner also own property in filing 6-A-21-RZ)- AirBnB Rules for Knoxville- Safety- Noise- Poor access from major roads and the neighborhood road system- This proposal does not meet multiple of the minimum standards set forth in article 4.104. - Standards for the use on review approval of rural retreats.- Why would anyone want to camp here?
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210902175106.pdf
Rick
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Rick (37849), September 2, 2021 at 10:22 PM
There are a lot of people speeding up and down W. Beaver Creek and adding 80+ cars coming in and out of the new subdivision is going to be extremely dangerous/deadly. If there are going to be 80 houses on 5 acres then they would only need a weedeater, no need for a lawnmower. Cleaning out the drains at Levi field and spillways only caused Lazy Acres to get more flooding than we used to. The only way to fix our drainage issues is to put in pipes and drains. I could build a dam in my yard and keep the water out in the road, that would be my cheapest option. If I put a drain pipe in my yard it will cause all the water to flood the houses on Cadillac Drive. We don't have the money to do that. Rick (37849), September 2, 2021 at 10:22 PM
Molly
37932
37932
9-SB-21-C
Molly (37932), September 6, 2021 at 8:11 PM
The citizens of Waverly, TN recently learned the consequences of building near a creek, but apparently, the developer of this future subdivision did not. We respectfully request that the committee take a look at the KGIS Fema Flood Map before approving this project. Our developer, HMH Development, cared enough about us to put our development high enough on the hill to prevent loss of life and property from a creek flood, but it looks like this future development won't be afforded the same opportunity. So in the event of a flood, and we have to rescue our neighbors in boats, who exactly do those washed-out homeowners pursue in court, the developer, or this approval committee? Molly (37932), September 6, 2021 at 8:11 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210906201116.pdf
Kevin
37923
37923
8-A-21-UR
Kevin (37923), September 7, 2021 at 9:22 AM
I have added my comments into the attachment. Kevin (37923), September 7, 2021 at 9:22 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210907092215.pdf
Tanya
37932
37932
7-SA-21-C
Tanya (37932), September 7, 2021 at 2:55 PM
I live in Massey Creek Subdivision, and I have concerns for the building plan with a proposed entrance off Mission Hill Lane. The entrance would be at the top of steep grade and a curve, which obstructs the sight line of oncoming traffic, so this is a significant safety concern. Also, the proposal of an 18th Lot placed at Hardin Valley Road should be removed as it will cause the any future plans to widen Hardin Valley even more problematic due to the location of this one lot. Based on the development of this area in just the few years we have lived in the area, it is obvious this road will need to be widened to accommodate the ongoing increase in traffic. Tanya (37932), September 7, 2021 at 2:55 PM
Concerned
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Concerned (37923), September 7, 2021 at 8:09 PM
What purpose would a "campground" serve in the middle of a residential area!?!? None. This is nothing more than a get-rich-quick scheme that will only bring trouble to the neighborhood. What about the children that will be exposed to the strangers coming thru? What about property value that will likely go down? What about property taxes that will likely go up? There is no good reasonable reason to put a "campground" in the middle of a residential neighborhood where there is no lakes, mountains, creeks, hiking trails or any other recreational amenities. This property is surrounded by train tacks and other residential properties. Concerned (37923), September 7, 2021 at 8:09 PM
Safety
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Safety (37923), September 7, 2021 at 8:19 PM
Other than this proposed campground paying off their mortgage, what benefit would it serve to the community….none. There’s nothing but train tracks and houses around the proposed site. Where’s the mountains, rivers, hiking trails, everything that most TRUE LIGIT campgrounds have!? More importantly, what about the safety of the neighborhood children!? It’s bad enough in today’s world, let’s not add to it but giving a reason for outsiders to come thru. This is not the place for a campground!! Most of us moved here to get away from the busy roads, heavy traffic, etc. so our children would be safer. Safety (37923), September 7, 2021 at 8:19 PM
George and Erika
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
George and Erika (37849), September 7, 2021 at 8:21 PM
(Please see attached document)George and Erika (37849), September 7, 2021 at 8:21 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210907202141.pdf
KEITH
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
KEITH (37923), September 8, 2021 at 2:55 AM
I AM VERY OPPOSED TO THIS CAMPGROUND !!!! alot of children play outside and ride bikes !!! this would create more traffic and alot of strangers in our neighborhood !!! There could be drugs and possibly sex trafficking !!! WHEN WE PURCHASED OUR HOME THERE WAS NO CAMPGROUND AND IF THERE WAS I WOULD NOT HAVE BOUGHT MY HOME IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD !!! WE WANT TO KEEP OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS SAFE AS POSSIBLE !!! ABSOLUTELY NO CAMPGROUND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS AREA IS RESIDENTIAL SO LETS KEEP IT THAT WAY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!KEITH (37923), September 8, 2021 at 2:55 AM
JUDITH
3
3
9-C-21-SU
JUDITH (3), September 8, 2021 at 3:17 AM
I AM VERY MUCH AGAINST HAVING A CAMPGROUND IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD !!! WE DO NOT NEED MORE VEHICLES FLYING THROUGH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD !!! MORE STRANGERS MEANS DRUGS AND REALLY PUTS CHILDRENS LIVES AT RISK !!! THIS WOULD DEFINITELY DEPRECIATE THE VALUE OF OUR PROPERTY !!! WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE WOULD BE COMING INTO OUR SUBDIVISION !!! THIS IS THE MOST ABSURD THING I HAVE EVER HEARD, PUTTING OUR LIVES IN DANGER BECAUSE SOMEONE WANTS TO MAKE MONEY !!!!!!!!!! I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS IS EVEN BEING CONSIDERED !!! JUDITH (3), September 8, 2021 at 3:17 AM
I DO NOT WANT TO CHANGE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Benjamin C.
37902
37902
8-G-21-RZ
Benjamin C. (37902), September 8, 2021 at 10:14 AM
Please find the attached letter confirming that we have been retained to speak on Agenda Item No. 9 at Thursday’s meeting.Benjamin C. (37902), September 8, 2021 at 10:14 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210908101429.pdf
Austin
37932
37932
9-B-21-UR
Austin (37932), September 8, 2021 at 11:10 AM
I live below and across the creek from the property involved in this case. I see that an overlay of the hillside/slope protection is included in the case plan, but there is no grading plan and no information from the builder on how much of the forest will be cleared.Austin (37932), September 8, 2021 at 11:10 AM
I believe a decision on this case should be postponed until a grading plan is submitted that includes how much of the forest will be bulldozed. Whether a retention pond will be required and if so where that will be located.
If a retention pond is required and therefore an HOA is required the builder should be encouraged to mimic the approach taken by the Black Forest subdivision located roughly 150-feet to the west and designate the entire hillside as HOA common property to contain the retention pond and protect the hillside from irresponsible/unknowledgeable homeowners who might decide to cut all the trees on their property. Homeowners seldom know that their land is still subject to hillside protection or that erosion prevent is still their responsibility if they decide to dramatically change their property.
In summary, what is the grading plan?
Kim
37932
37932
9-I-21-RZ
Kim (37932), September 8, 2021 at 11:32 AM
These parcels were zoned CA -- or as it was called Commercial "A" -- on the original zoning map adopted for Knox County in the 1950s. The Growth Policy Plan and it's policies regarding the Rural Area were not adopted by the City of Knoxville, Town of Farragut and Knox County until 2000 -- so there are many places around the County that have CA zoning in the Rural Area that pre-dates the Growth Policy Plan. It gets sticky with the update and adoption of the NW Sector Plan in 2016 where this property was intentionally designated as AG. The zoning was never updated. We are finding that there are numerous parcels across the county where the underlying zoning does not align with the Sector Plans and should....this parcel being one of them. Planning Staff is currently making an effort to identify those parcels and address, which is a tremendous undertaking. With regards to the request for CR for a portion of this parcel, the more recent NW Sector Plan embodies the vision of the county and community for this area which does not include CR. Kim (37932), September 8, 2021 at 11:32 AM
Kim
37932
37932
9-B-21-SP
Kim (37932), September 8, 2021 at 11:33 AM
These parcels were zoned CA -- or as it was called Commercial "A" -- on the original zoning map adopted for Knox County in the 1950s .The Growth Policy Plan and it's policies regarding the Rural Area were not adopted by the City of Knoxville, Town of Farragut and Knox County until 2000 -- so there are many places around the County that have CA zoning in the Rural Area that pre-dates the Growth Policy Plan. It gets sticky with the update and adoption of the NW Sector Plan in 2016 where this property was intentionally designated as AG. The zoning was never updated. We are finding that there are numerous parcels across the county where the underlying zoning does not align with the Sector Plans and should....this parcel being one of them. Planning Staff is currently making an effort to identify those parcels and address, which is a tremendous undertaking. With regards to the request for CR for a portion of this parcel, the more recent NW Sector Plan embodies the vision of the county and community for this area which does not include CR. Kim (37932), September 8, 2021 at 11:33 AM
Jay
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Jay (37919), September 8, 2021 at 12:42 PM
The board of the Kingston Pike - Sequoyah Hills Association has voted to oppose the closure of right of way referenced in case 9-A-21-SC. The board supports maintaining public access to the city park, which is on the river side of the Cherokee Boulevard properties referenced in the case file above.Jay (37919), September 8, 2021 at 12:42 PM
For decades, neighborhood residents have used the existing current public access to enter the park. Many have mentioned this on our neighborhood Facebook page, and in public comments to the commission.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210908124232.pdf
Matthew
37932
37932
9-I-21-RZ
Matthew (37932), September 8, 2021 at 12:53 PM
This comment is in regards to 9-I-21-RZ & 9-B-21-SP. I ask you to heavily consider denial of commercial property at this location. The surrounding area is single family neighborhoods, too many developments have already been approved within walking distance, & this specific area is heavily congested and will only get worse as the current and proposed developments are completed. Commercial use at this location is very inconsistent with surrounding property. No plans, that I am aware of, are in the works for commercial use and I highly suggest the commercial application is revisited if and when better plans are available. I agree that some areas benefit from mixed use, but this is not one of them at this time. Matthew (37932), September 8, 2021 at 12:53 PM
Margaret
37919
37919
9-A-21-SC
Margaret (37919), September 8, 2021 at 1:25 PM
I have reviewed the application and accompanying pdf’s from various city and state agencies for a city of Knoxville Closure of Public Right of Way for this access to Sequoyah Park.Margaret (37919), September 8, 2021 at 1:25 PM
As a resident of Sequoyah Hills I wish to voice my objection to closing this Public Right of Way.
It is indeed an error on the application that the closure would only affect two properties, the lots to the direct east and west of this parcel. There are over 100 properties in Sequoyah Hills that have use of this Right of Way as the easiest and safest way to access the Park. There are even houses further East with children who use this access on their bicycles to access the Park as the closer entrance at Southgate is too dangerous, no sidewalks, and too much traffic for children on their bicycles.
This has been a Public Right of Way historically for over 80 years in Sequoyah Hills and will should continue to be so for generations in the future. Because a recent homeowner moved into the neighborhood and wants to close the Right of Way and add to his property is not a sufficient or even merited basis for closing the Public Right of Way. A public easement, as the applicant has offered, is not the same thing and is not protected for generations in the future in the same manner as a Public Right of Way.
Brian
37932
37932
9-SB-21-C
Brian (37932), September 8, 2021 at 2:11 PM
See attached comments and photoBrian (37932), September 8, 2021 at 2:11 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210908141137.pdf
Matthew
37932
37932
9-C-21-UR
Matthew (37932), September 8, 2021 at 2:18 PM
Please see the attached pdf on my request to DENY this development. As President of Massey Creek HOA, I am letting you know we are completely against this developer using Mission Hill Ln for an entrance/exit to a 33 unit attached home concept. We professionally maintain the boulevard entrance this concept is requesting to use. Also, the 33 attached home concept is a non-connected separate development from the 47 single family detached homes they are requesting along Hardin Valley Rd. The planning commission should require the applicant to submit two separate development concepts since that is what this is. I see no issue with the 47 detached homes along Hardin Valley Rd as long as Connor Creek, Knox County Greenway, & the hillside is protected and maintained. I am completely against the 33 attached home development. Massey Creek HOA would be happy to discuss purchase options for the 14 or so acres they have proposed to build the 33 attached homes on. Matthew (37932), September 8, 2021 at 2:18 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210908141836.pdf
Kevin
37918
37918
9-A-21-PD
Kevin (37918), September 8, 2021 at 2:49 PM
Request for Landscaping, Lighting, and Master Sign Plans to have public Planning Commission hearings, and appreciation of applicant and staff detail and work on this application.Kevin (37918), September 8, 2021 at 2:49 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210908144929.pdf
Jessie
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Jessie (37849), September 8, 2021 at 2:50 PM
I have some concerns about the impact this rezoning will have on myself and my family, as we live in the Lazy acres neighborhood beside the proposed land. I worry about the traffic that will increase because of a new development, and the hazards that will bring when my children start to learn to drive. I am concerned about the flooding in our neighborhood that is already a problem and will more than likely worsen with the disturbance of land. I also am concerned about our schools ability to handle an influx of the children that will move in to that neighborhood, as Powell elementary is already over crowded. I am also concerned about the increase in noise level that a subdivision of that size will bring to our quiet adjacent neighborhood. Thank you for taking the time to consider my view point and keep them in mind when deciding what is best for our community. Jessie (37849), September 8, 2021 at 2:50 PM
Jaime
37932
37932
9-I-21-RZ
Jaime (37932), September 8, 2021 at 3:35 PM
There in no way should be a commercial development in this location. Within 1/8 of a mile of this location is the Ball Homes 300+ development. In addition to this, across the street are two separate developments you are in the process of approving with 100+ additional homes. We are already looking at a traffic problem at this intersection. Adding any commercial type of property will further add to this growing problem. There are no shoulders or turning lane on this portion of Hardin Valley Road. The area consist of all residential homes. The community stands by the sector plan which does NOT include commercial land use on this parcel of any kind. We have no idea how the 400+ homes above are going to affect this area. Please do not continue to add to the many issues we are already dealing with in Hardin Valley. Jaime (37932), September 8, 2021 at 3:35 PM
Keri
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Keri (37923), September 8, 2021 at 4:39 PM
I too oppose of this proposed campground. I have to many negative reasons why I oppose to list here. But for a few so you get an idea is…. This is a neighborhood I don’t see why anyone would want to camp here anyway. 1-3 tents would be just the start of it. Also, this will bring to much traffic into our neighborhood. And unknown traffic at that. We have kids playing here. Not to mention this is right across the street from me. There a kids right next to here as well as right around the corner. That is to dangerous in my opinion. And would be hard to determine accountability on crime as to most of the campers would be unknown. It’s not like you would be able to look up sex offenders renting these tents! I would rather keep our peaceful mostly, quiet neighborhood just the way it is! Keri (37923), September 8, 2021 at 4:39 PM
Audra
37932
37932
9-I-21-RZ
Audra (37932), September 8, 2021 at 5:21 PM
We do not have the the structure to sustain this type of growth. We need to maintain some green spaces. We can't keep building. Our school and roads can not handle it. Audra (37932), September 8, 2021 at 5:21 PM
Jamie
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Jamie (37923), September 8, 2021 at 5:58 PM
This is quite obviously a money grab by the owner (or group of owners? Or an out of state Investment firm???). As a resident of the neighborhood, this is not something I would feel comfortable living near. I love my home because there is one way in and out and the only people who should be around here, live around here, or are visiting someone. It is safe and protected. Campsites can be noisy and easily trashed. Also, who is going to even camp here?!? In a neighborhood, next to railroad tracks, near 0 trails or waterways?….. absolutely ridiculous plan. Please consider using this property as its zoning intends (agriculture!!!!) or SELL IT. Jamie (37923), September 8, 2021 at 5:58 PM
Penny
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Penny (37923), September 8, 2021 at 6:30 PM
I agree with the above comments. A campground in the middle of a neighborhood surrounded by train tracks? Amazing ambiance???? I think not. Not to mention the previous concerns about children and traffic through a small neighborhood. This is a nice quiet place. Would like to keep it that way.Penny (37923), September 8, 2021 at 6:30 PM
Michael
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Michael (37923), September 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM
As a resident of the Hunting Hills neighborhood I am against the special use of this property as a campground. It will add more traffic that is dangerous to children and all residents. Please do now allow this to happen.Michael (37923), September 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM
Jim
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Jim (37923), September 8, 2021 at 9:20 PM
Not one person in this neighborhood would benefit from this proposal except for the one property owner who is pushing this idea.Don't destroy the neighborhood I have lived in for more than 25 years and that all of us love. Jim (37923), September 8, 2021 at 9:20 PM
Gregory
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Gregory (37849), September 9, 2021 at 1:51 AM
Please see attached file.Gregory (37849), September 9, 2021 at 1:51 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210909015148.pdf
Michael
37932
37932
9-I-21-RZ
Michael (37932), September 9, 2021 at 7:51 AM
I am a homeowner in Vining Mill and my property is directly south of the subject parcel. There is a stream which runs between the parcel and Vining Mill. Along the stream is a beautiful tree line. We request that as the approval process continues and any building permit is contemplated that as much of the tree line be maintained as a buffer and for climate change impacts.Michael (37932), September 9, 2021 at 7:51 AM
Deron
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Deron (37923), September 9, 2021 at 8:03 AM
Access through back of subdivision in unacceptable. 'Pop-up' tents to be used for toilets is NOT a permanent solution, and plans do not detail where all of the 'pop-up' tents will be located. There is no plan for upkeep and replacement of these temporary structures. Putting camp sites along the train tracks will NOT be an enjoyable experience for campers. This will not be used by vacationers, but will wind up being a low-cost stay for the homeless and will lead to a lot of problems for the residents who live in the area. Please do NOT approve this. Nobody who lives in the area wants this here. Planning Commision: would you approve this type of request in YOUR subdivision?Deron (37923), September 9, 2021 at 8:03 AM
Holly
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Holly (37923), September 9, 2021 at 8:31 AM
We recently relocated to the area from Charlotte, NC. We chose this neighborhood for the quietness and it not being a "cut through". The driveway to this property happens to be 3 driveways from ours and I don't see how this is safe for our children. How will this help the value of our homes?Holly (37923), September 9, 2021 at 8:31 AM
We want to feel safe!!
Kathryn
37849
37849
8-G-21-RZ
Kathryn (37849), September 9, 2021 at 9:50 AM
The people of Lazy Acres request that you deny the proposal to rezone the property, at 4114 West Beaver Creek Drive, bordering Lazy Acres. Kathryn (37849), September 9, 2021 at 9:50 AM
Please see the attached PDF containing my specific comments regarding this matter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210909095025.pdf
Lauren
37923
37923
9-C-21-SU
Lauren (37923), September 9, 2021 at 10:03 AM
As a resident of Chimney Ridge Road and a concerned neighbor and mother of 2 children, I find that this request for a campground in a residential neighborhood is not acceptable. I myself am an avid backpacking/tent camper; however this is a residential neighborhood and not a place for a campsite. Furthermore we must address the safety of the campsite/campers with the train in such close proximity there is ample opportunity for injury to campers; as well as children who live in the neighborhood from individuals who may be at the campsite. I moved to this neighborhood because of the safe environment and ability for my children to be able to play outside without my concern for their safety, but now that there will be strangers roaming around behind my house I have to now question their safety. Furthermore there will be individuals now driving through the cul-da-sac looking for a campground in a neighborhood and not watching for children playing which could also lead to an accident. Please consider denying the campsite in our backyards!Lauren (37923), September 9, 2021 at 10:03 AM