October 3, 2024
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

94 Comments
Shaun
37917
10-B-24-PA
Shaun (37917), September 16, 2024 at 7:30 PM
I am a nearby resident, and I absolutely support the rezoning of this land to medium density. Knoxville is sorely lacking in this style of housing, and while I would personally love to see townhomes built on the land, based on the proximity to the apartments, I assume more of them will be placed on this land. Again, I am a big proponent of this rezoning, and hope that the infrastructure nearby (sidewalks, etc) can be improved to accommodate the higher number of residents (but by no means find that to be a requirement as density is great in this area, I'd love to see more business nearby because of the higher density).
Mary Jo
37912
7-A-24-SU
Mary Jo (37912), August 2, 2024 at 11:36 AM
See attached document regarding my concerns about this proposed development.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240802113604.pdf
Carlene
37918
4-A-24-OA
Carlene (37918), August 5, 2024 at 11:12 AM
I am asking that 4-A-24-OA be postponed for 30 days. This amendment to the text of the Knoxville Zoning Ordinance is complex. The language of the proposed text changes/additions was not on the PC website and available to the public until Friday, August 2, 2024. In other words, there was nothing for the public to consider or review until Friday. Six days is insufficient time for the public to seriously consider complex text changes. Six days does not allow for meaningful participation during the PC phase of the legally-mandated review process.
Bill
37919
8-A-23-OA
Bill (37919), July 26, 2023 at 9:25 AM
I support R. Bentley Marlow's proposal to help allow more affordable housing and reduce our housing crisis.
Finbarr
37919
8-A-23-OA
Finbarr (37919), July 31, 2023 at 11:14 AM
this suggestion seem reasonable and probably helpful.
Patricia
37912
5-SC-24-C
Patricia (37912), June 24, 2024 at 11:11 AM
In 2014 a developer submitted the use of Monterey Oaks 8.23 acres tract for 18 single-family detached lots, at a density of 2.19 du/ac. FILE #1-SB-14-C MPC stated that one of the (10) conditions for approval was: "Providing a geotechnical study prepared by a registered engineer for the proposed building sites for Lots 6-15, verifying that the subsurface is suitable for building construction. The geotechnical study must be submitted to the Knoxville Department of Engineering for review and approval prior to approval of a building permit for each lot." It was observed that the original developer (Camdun Realty LLC) dug out a large area within the now proposed duplex site as a dumping ground for dozens of large tree stumps, which were then buried. The decomposition of these stumps would make the ground unstable for the future of permanent buildings. It is critical for the safety and integrity of any structures that this area be deemed thoroughly safe. This major concern, as well as the previous runoff problems related to the slope of the acreage, must be given serious investigation before any building is permitted.

Christina
37921
8-A-23-OA
Christina (37921), August 2, 2023 at 8:12 PM
I support this application, particularly the addition of a “detached multi-family” development type and removal of the special use review requirement for ADUs. See supportive reasoning attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230802201252.pdf
Jessica
37909
9-SC-24-C
Jessica (37909), August 22, 2024 at 3:22 PM
Will this new development connect to Timbercrest in any way? We would rather it not. It will have it's own entrance, correct? The neighborhood would rather not connect to this development via Yosemite nor Lance Dr. A lot of woods will be sacrificed for these new homes.
Patricia
37909
9-SC-24-C
Patricia (37909), August 22, 2024 at 5:29 PM
This plan will release too many cars into our neighborhood. It needs another exit to Lonas. The neighborhood park and pool are very close to the proposed exit on Lance, and it could add a lot of traffic in that area. Please, make them exit elsewhere, not at Lance and Yosemite.
Howell
37909
9-SC-24-C
Howell (37909), August 25, 2024 at 3:55 PM
Is this still per the original drawings that NO access will be from Farland Dr.? Is it just dividing the once big lots into small lots? We don't want a "cut through" for Timbercrest.
Kevin
37921
9-A-24-SU
Kevin (37921), August 28, 2024 at 10:15 AM
I think it's a good idea to have a garage on this end of Chapman Hwy especially with all the shops run down to the other end of Chapman Hwy. I think it will be a great idea because people with car troubles on this end could stop by and get some help
Richard
37914
9-A-24-SU
Richard (37914), August 28, 2024 at 11:36 AM
Would be a benefit to the community bring employment and opportunity to others
Joesette
37920
9-A-24-SU
Joesette (37920), August 28, 2024 at 4:28 PM
This is a really great car company and it will increase employment opportunities. And also more space for auto repairs.
Sparkle
37920
9-A-24-SU
Sparkle (37920), August 28, 2024 at 4:33 PM
We needed for the community. It's so convenient for neighborhood and employment.
Clay
37714
9-A-24-SU
Clay (37714), August 28, 2024 at 5:53 PM
I think we need garage around here. A lot of car lot not garage. More employment
Donovan
37920
9-A-24-SU
Donovan (37920), August 28, 2024 at 6:00 PM
In my opinion we need more locally owned and operated shops here in knoxville who do good business with the community and help the little guy I would rather car conexxion expand than for another set of apartments spring up please help us help the little guys.
Ethan
37920
9-A-24-SU
Ethan (37920), August 28, 2024 at 6:08 PM
The garage is convenient and close, and offers employment opportunities. We can't wait !!
Robert
37920
9-A-24-SU
Robert (37920), August 28, 2024 at 6:29 PM
It would help a local business owner grow his business in our south knox area and help the look of the property
Donald
37920
9-A-24-SU
Donald (37920), August 29, 2024 at 10:32 AM
Help is good for our community I love to have it and have a local guy on a business right there to serve the community
Narjia
37738
9-A-24-SU
Narjia (37738), August 29, 2024 at 10:32 AM
Yes!!! It would be a local business and give us more job availability!!! This would be really beneficial!
Shameika
37738
9-A-24-SU
Shameika (37738), August 29, 2024 at 10:36 AM
The development of car connexions garage would be a great establishment at its location. I have been visiting this shop for several years and it has provided great and affordable services at a convenient location. It would be a great establishment for the surrounding community at large as this development would not just service current customers like myself but will attract people of the neighborhood and new customers and also provide employment opportunities for the people within the area of study and expertise.
Tara
37915
9-A-24-SU
Tara (37915), August 29, 2024 at 11:19 AM
We need more local shops this would be a great addition ... We would love to support this business in moving to our area
Brad
37912
9-E-24-RZ
Brad (37912), August 29, 2024 at 12:10 PM
My name is Brad Dye and I live at 6211 Primus Road which is in relation to this proposed re-zoning. Please see my concerns below: 1. How would the traffic flow and infrastructure be routed to/from this proposed re-zoning area if they are planning on a multi-housing/family development? Currently, the infrastructure Northbound on Primus is not suited for a significant increase in traffic! Also, would they or do they intend to connect Northbound Primus to Wilbanks/Callahan Road making it a through road from Callahan to Murray Road? This would change everything with a huge increase in traffic and the flow especially when I-75 North or South is delayed due to accidents or construction! Do they plan an entry/exit from Keck Road also? That would be the more feasible entry/exit to a multi-family development. 2. What level of housing do they plan to put on this property? I am concerned with my property value and the potential for a decrease in value if not developed to help the property value in this area versus a lower income development or HUD! 3. I am very concerned with an increased exposure to my property and the properties surrounding me which my neighbors are concerned also! Potentially, we could be looking at adding additional property security with gates/fencing to maintain our current level of privacy which will be costly! Please respond accordingly! Thank you, Brad Dye
Barry
37918
9-A-24-SU
Barry (37918), August 29, 2024 at 12:37 PM
This location would be ideal for a local automotive repair shop that will service the local community and provide affordable repairs and local jobs. I know the owners personally and their family and they bring value and culture to the area and should be allowed to expand their business.
Kelly
37924
9-A-24-SU
Kelly (37924), August 29, 2024 at 1:42 PM
This would be a great asset to the community in terms of needed services and employment opportunities.
Clement
37931
9-A-24-SU
Clement (37931), August 29, 2024 at 3:06 PM
It's very good idea good for creating job
Ashley
37920
9-A-24-SU
Ashley (37920), August 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM
This is a great buisness that is great price espically intodays times. There are not alot of machanics in the area that are trustwortly. They add to this community and would onlly add more vaule and help to this south knox community.
8-A-23-OA
Ron (37919), August 3, 2023 at 3:27 PM
It seems like this is exactly the kind of revision that our zoning needs to even attempt to address the findings of the MMH report and the need for affordable housing.
Detached multifamily housing seems like a greatly underutilized and a more affordable option in a city that moderate income people are having a hard time even finding housing in.
Sandra
37920
9-A-24-SU
Sandra (37920), August 29, 2024 at 5:19 PM
We need this garage in this area
Mark
3 I 9
9-G-24-RZ
Mark (3 I 9), August 31, 2024 at 5:16 PM
I hope you do not rezone this.. any green space that there is you keep rezoning and building a massive amount of houses. The streets here are already at a standstill and way to congested and you guys keep approving more land to get taken up by houses. I didn't move here in " the country" to have you guys make it all houses. There are plenty of other towns that can be built up some. The schools are already overloaded and you want to burden us even more. You keep building massive sub divisions all around in one spot and it is insane. I hope you do not approve this because it will be a disaster to the town
Anthony
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Anthony (37931), August 31, 2024 at 6:38 PM
I would like to submit a request for the planning commission to carefully consider the current housing developments on Karns Valley Drive and the potential impact that a new housing development will create. The traffic saturation level on this road is extremely high even with the addition of the temporary red light at Karns Valley Drive and Beaver Ridge. Karns Valley is frequently used by large commercial trucks. There are currently several condo units in development on Karns Valley Drive which impinge upon the visibility of drivers attempting to exit the established neighborhoods on the road and have contributed to the traffic congestion. I am not necessarily opposed to a new housing development on the proposed site. However, I would ask for the commission to consider limiting the number of units allowed to be build upon this property and for the units to be reflective of the current established neighborhoods in the area.
Bradley
37920
9-A-24-SU
Bradley (37920), September 2, 2024 at 1:13 PM
Have had work done here before they need to expand. A new garage would help the south knoxville community
Howell
37909
9-SC-24-C
Howell (37909), September 2, 2024 at 5:58 PM
This is much different than the first time he asked for the subdivision. In the first one there was not much or any access to Farland and not all the way through to Timbercrest. As far as I can tell no one was consulted in the Far View Hills section on the road going all the way through to Timbercrest. It needs to be looked at better to see if there are any other way to access it. I am really concerned that there was no contact with Far View Hills Neighborhood.
Sara
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Sara (37931), September 2, 2024 at 8:56 PM
As a resident of Brookhaven subdivision, there are so many issues to consider with a new building. The first is the traffic that is already horrendous along Karns Valley. The second is concerns about Beaver creek as it is a wonderful blue way with tons of life. How will this effect our precious waters and wildlife?? Finally, the addition of townhomes/condos/duplex's is absolutely greedy and a disgusting use of that land that will effect our livelihoods long after the builders have made their money and left.
Dominique
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Dominique (37931), September 4, 2024 at 12:47 PM
Building a new subdivision on the Mcfarland land is going to add to existing problems we have due to the influx of new people. The area is becoming over developed with residents but our community infrastructure is not developed enough to support the rapidly growing population. More residents will add to traffic which is already a huge problem. In addition, our roads are falling apart and we only get temporary fixes. New housing will be detrimental to our community.
Capt Chris
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Capt Chris (37931), September 4, 2024 at 1:02 PM
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the ongoing construction of additional residences in our Karns community. While I understand the desire for growth and development, I believe that the current pace of construction is far outpacing the infrastructure and resources necessary to support a larger population. The traffic congestion on Emory Road and surrounding areas has become increasingly unbearable. The roads are already overburdened, leading to long wait times, increased pollution, and a significant decline in quality of life for residents. Adding more homes to the mix will only exacerbate these problems. I urge the relevant authorities to reconsider the current rate of development and take steps to mitigate the negative impacts on our community. This may include:
* Imposing a temporary moratorium on new construction until the existing infrastructure can be adequately upgraded.
* Reevaluating the zoning regulations and land use.
* I believe that it is essential to prioritize the well-being of our community and the long-term sustainability of our development. By taking action to address the traffic congestion and other related issues, we can ensure that our community remains a desirable place to live and work for years to come.
Scott
37909
9-SC-24-C
Scott (37909), September 4, 2024 at 1:19 PM
Those of us on Farland Dr. strongly oppose having 22 homes placed on such a small parcel of land, along with a direct connection to Farland Dr. Especially not if there is a connection to Yosemite Trail and or Lance Dr; Farland is not designed to handle such an increase in traffic. I keep hearing from neighbors that the original plan was approved with 7 or so houses, with the condition that the connection of the development to Lonas Dr would be through Brentway Cir. Then it was "discovered" that Brentway was a private street, so then the entrance was pushed to Farland. If this is true, this was clearly a bait and switch to get approval from the city. Anyone who looks at a map will see that Brentway is a private street in an apartment complex.
Tammy
37932
9-G-24-RZ
Tammy (37932), September 4, 2024 at 3:49 PM
Traffic on Karns Valley has significantly increased over the last year. It is at a standstill at peak times during the day which is extremely difficult to pull out of or into the Brookhaven subdivision. While I also hate to see all the land converted to subdivisions, the infrastructure cannot support the current load much less anything additional. As a parent of driving teenagers it's extremely stressful as they navigate driving with people flying past on the outsides of the road to pass the full length of Karns Valley. It's getting out of control.
Benjamin
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Benjamin (37931), September 4, 2024 at 7:31 PM
This new development should take into consideration the heavy amount of traffic in Karns Valley and Emory Road. The addition of a 6du property in this area will not be supported with the current road infrastructure in this area. I know that our concerns will not halt the development of this property but I highly encourage a 4DU property instead. At least this will offer a few less cars in an already heavily populated area.
Chad
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Chad (37931), September 4, 2024 at 7:37 PM
Traffic on Karns Valley and the red light at West Emory and Beaver Ridge Road cannot handle the traffic now with the multiple new Smithbilt developments in the area. Please consider traffic upgrades prior to allowing another neighborhood to be built. Also, six units per acre is unreasonably too close together. The new development should match neighboring communities at four units per acre.
Teri
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Teri (37931), September 4, 2024 at 8:23 PM
You should not rezone this. The schools are already over crowded and there's too much traffic congestion with the roads built the way they are and you are destroying the protected wet lands.
Amanda
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Amanda (37931), September 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM
Hello. I am writing to voice my concerns about the new possible subdivision. Our community infrastructure does not support the quick rise in population. There have been several new subdivisions on Karns Valley and West Emory in the last several months, and it has negatively impacted the community as a whole. Traffic is always backed up so badly in the morning and afternoon. Not only do I have difficulty getting in and out of my own subdivision, our school busses are having difficulty getting children to school on time due to traffic back up. Please do not allow any more residential space because we simply cannot keep up with it!
9-G-24-RZ
Amy (37931), September 5, 2024 at 11:36 AM
I have attached a document with my statement as well as photos. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240905113658.pdf
Bryant
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Bryant (37931), September 5, 2024 at 8:34 PM
My comments are in the attached document. Thanks for your time and attention.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240905203402.pdf
Stephanie
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Stephanie (37931), September 5, 2024 at 9:07 PM
Please plan for roads before allowing more houses in this area. We already have a hard time getting out of our subdivision because of traffic flow on Karns Valley Road.
Tiffany
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Tiffany (37931), September 6, 2024 at 7:56 AM
I am a current resident of Brookhaven and our entire neighborhood has concerns with this planned development. Overcrowding, more traffic on an already saturated infrastructure, safety concerns, roads that are already inaccessible during certain times of the day. Those are just a few of the many reasons why building more homes in this area is a terrible idea. Wildlife is another concern. As we continue to build up the area we are removing habitats. There will be even more incidents of animals being stuck by vehicles which will increase the risk of medical emergencies.
Jordan
37909
9-SC-24-C
Jordan (37909), September 6, 2024 at 9:05 AM
I live on Yosemite trail and this develop could drastically impact how busy our road will be. I would like to request a traffic study being conducted before any construction work begins. Thank you.
Brianne
37909
9-SC-24-C
Brianne (37909), September 6, 2024 at 2:33 PM
I am writing to request that a thorough traffic study be done before this construction is allowed to proceed. As a resident of Yosemite Trail, adding 21 homes AND connecting the road to Farland Drive would cause an inconsiderable increase in traffic and make living on Yosemite Trail dangerous. I would have the planning commission ask the builder and landowner to only connect the new house for Farland Drive as they have much fewer houses than are already in the Timbercrest neighborhood. If that that is not possible than I please urge and and request an in-depth traffic study to be done before construction is allowed. Thank you for reading my plea.
George
37932
8-A-23-OA
George (37932), August 7, 2023 at 12:05 PM
Agenda items (8A23OA,8B23OA,8C23OA,8D23OA,8E23OA)all relate to defining ADU's and relaxing set backs, buffers and the like. These requests can be construed to introduce ADU's to Knoxville. However, may also be construed as method to simply increase building density way tighter than current standards. They also can allow a rental property be added to nearly any lot/location.
I am against each of these agenda items.
And I think the County, the Planning Commission and residents need A LOT more conversations about introducing and controlling ADU's (like the ADU must be occupied by an immediate family member) prior to introduction of this concept.
Following this research, the concept should be trialed in one district to learn impact and control, and NOT just open the floodgates in all districts!
Scott
37909
9-SC-24-C
Scott (37909), September 8, 2024 at 11:41 AM
Everything about this site plan is acceptable with the exception of the connection to Farland Dr. Please do not allow this connection to take place. Timbercrest is a stand alone neighborhood and should continue to be a stand alone neighborhood. No resident of Timbercrest will want the additional traffic that the conection would allow. The houses are an acceptable expansion, the connection is NOT.
Leslie
37909
9-SC-24-C
Leslie (37909), September 8, 2024 at 1:40 PM
I do not mind the new neighborhood being build. I do however do not think think neighborhood should connect to the current Timbercrest neighborhood. It will cause too much traffic in the neighborhood making it unsafe for the current residents. People will use it was a way the cut though and avoid traffic. It will bring down the currently safe and quiet community.
Laura
37909
9-SC-24-C
Laura (37909), September 8, 2024 at 8:32 PM
Please refer to the attached letter for concerns.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240908203248.pdf
Michael
37909
9-SC-24-C
Michael (37909), September 9, 2024 at 7:43 AM
The area around the Timbercrest Pool is conserved as natural area. Any engineered water runoff zone adjacent to the pool natural area which cuts down trees won't be appropriate for the land or natural hydrology. The proposed house lots may be too small. Compute the average lot size and standard deviation of every lot in the Far View Hills and Timbercrest neighborhoods. Ensure that the proposed development has an average lot size within 5% of the existing lot sizes for these neighborhoods. This would be a fair, mathematically impartial standard for lot size.
Emilia
37909
9-SB-24-C
Emilia (37909), September 9, 2024 at 9:27 AM
My husband, Jose March-Leuba, and I are the owners of the first lot in Bennett Place (see attached plan drawing) that will be directly affected by this development of the corner property in Broome Road. We will not tolerate disruption of our bordering vegetation (trees and shrubs) because that will negatively affect our property. We will also no tolerate noise at night and would like to have some assurance that this will not happen. Is it even legal to put so many town houses in such an small parcel? We oppose this development unless certain guarantees are provided. 
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240909092709.pdf
Jessica
37909
9-SC-24-C
Jessica (37909), September 9, 2024 at 10:54 AM
See attached letter from Timbercrest Neighborhood Association
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240909105403.pdf
Tara
37920
8-A-23-OA
Tara (37920), August 8, 2023 at 7:47 AM
This proposal will damage existing neighborhoods with negligible affordable housing benefits. This removes opportunities for neighborhoods to have a voice in development, and loosens requirements for developers. This will change the character of historic neighborhoods, leading to additional traffic and safety issues. This is an effort to silence neighborhood input, while providing a boon for developers in the guise of ‘affordable housing.’
Aaron
37917
8-A-23-OA
Aaron (37917), August 8, 2023 at 8:28 AM
See attachment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230808082833.pdf
Dustin
37917
8-A-23-OA
Dustin (37917), August 8, 2023 at 8:11 PM
See attached for my full comments in support of this Amendment as both a local renter who can't afford a house due to lack of supply and as a Knoxville Transportation Authority Commissioner.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230808201157.pdf
Patricia
12
5-SC-24-C
Patricia (12), June 2, 2024 at 2:19 PM
When considering the request to allow development on the Monterey Oaks property, please note the following :
Since 2006 there have been six owners of this property. The last owner had planned to build two or three homes (for family), but three of the other previous owners had plans for larger developments, but were not successful in their attempts.
In 2006 Camdun Realty LLC spent hundreds of thousands of dollars clearing the hardwoods and vegetation, grading extensively, and preparing 18 lots for sale. However, with heavy rain the problem of uncontrollable runoff became an issue , with water gullies created, and water collecting at the end of the cul-de-sac on Peppercorn Lane, at the foot of the hill. The problem persisted , even with plastic fencing, straw bales, and a retention pond at the lowest point of the property . Finally the property was auctioned off. Two other attempts to develop have also been unsuccessful, due to financial or environmental obstacles.
There is a reason this property has not been developed for 18 years. Please do not let the neighborhood suffer the consequences of another attempt.









Polly
37909
9-SC-24-C
Polly (37909), September 10, 2024 at 10:10 AM
I would welcome an opportunity for the neighborhoods to work with the developer. That would have been best at an earlier stage. Both neighborhoods will have negative impact with the existing plan. Something to consider is splitting, mostly equally, the number of houses between the neighborhoods and not connecting the two neighbors, but leaving the number of houses the same. That is a suggested compromise that might be agreeable to most. It's always alarming when things are not discussed in advance and the notification from Planning didn't give neighborhoods enough time to properly get correct information. Thank you for your consideration for responsible growth for Knoxville.
Fleida
4638
5-A-24-SU
Fleida (4638), June 4, 2024 at 2:41 PM
I have lived here for 25 years This has always been a good neighborhood for seniors to walk in and children to play in. the increased traffic from new project in not good for neighborhood. The new project should have its own entrance in and out instead of going 1 mile thru a subdivision with 10 connecting stop signs. Halfway up melstone there is a pool were many traffic accidents have occurred.
Carole
37912
5-A-24-SU
Carole (37912), June 4, 2024 at 2:59 PM
i am opposed to the project because of the increased traffic. this single residence was not designed for this amount of traffic going down melstone to merchants rd. there is a community pool half way down on melstone were is is always crowded on spring and summer months
Debbie
37912
5-A-24-SU
Debbie (37912), June 4, 2024 at 5:02 PM
Please see attached letter. A petition with 96 signatures of residents that this development would impact is attached in another comment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240604170201.pdf
Debbie
37912
5-A-24-SU
Debbie (37912), June 4, 2024 at 5:40 PM
See pgs 1-7 of 12 page petition. Divided into parts to upload. This file contains 1-56 signatures
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240604174038.pdf
Betty Jo
37912
7-P-24-RZ
Betty Jo (37912), July 8, 2024 at 12:26 PM
We agree wholeheartedly with Planning staff on denial of increasing the zoning on this property from single family to multi-family use. The Inskip area has been inundated with multi-family housing over the years. This would also increase the traffic on roads that have not been improved or updated in years. Please uphold staff's recommendation to not change the zoning or the plan amendments for this property.
Debbie
37912
5-A-24-SU
Debbie (37912), June 4, 2024 at 5:42 PM
See 2nd part of petition, 57-96 signatures
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240604174224.pdf
R. Bentley
37921
8-A-23-OA
R. Bentley (37921), August 10, 2023 at 12:16 PM
Please see attached...
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230810121655.pdf
Sofía
37909
9-SC-24-C
Sofía (37909), September 11, 2024 at 8:30 AM
I am writing to express my strong concern regarding the proposed plans to chop down the woods adjacent to my property. I believe that preserving these woods is crucial for several reasons:
Environmental Impact: The woods provide significant ecological benefits, such as supporting local wildlife, improving air quality, and offering natural flood control. Their preservation is vital for maintaining these environmental functions.
Community Well-Being: These woods contribute to the quality of life in our community by offering recreational space, promoting mental well-being, and enhancing the aesthetic appeal of the area.
Property Values: Natural green spaces like these can increase property values and attract individuals who value environmental conservation, benefiting the community economically.
Historical or Cultural Value: If applicable, the woods may have historical or cultural significance for our community, which would be worth preserving.
Alternative Solutions: I urge the committee to consider alternative plans that achieve the desired goals without requiring the destruction of these valuable woods.
I hope you will consider these points carefully and seek solutions that balance development needs with environmental and community interests. Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Jonathan
37909
9-SC-24-C
Jonathan (37909), September 11, 2024 at 8:42 AM
I agree that a traffic study needs to be conducted as well as a land timber study. The amount of houses is also a big concern. The development will have a huge negative impact on the neighborhood.
Chris
37909
9-SC-24-C
Chris (37909), September 11, 2024 at 8:42 AM
Please see attached letter.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240911084250.pdf
Sherman
37909
9-SC-24-C
Sherman (37909), September 11, 2024 at 8:45 AM
We have been Timbercrest home owners for over 60 years. Connecting Yosemite Trail and Farland Drive will result in a short cut through the heart of Timbercrest. It would change the character of Timbercrest, hurt property values, and be very disruptive to the well established peace and serenity of the area. There are already 3 access roads into Timbercrest. Timber Pass, Starmont Trail, and the Knoxville Racquet Club’s private driveway. We do not need a 4th road into this quiet neighborhood. We are not aware of any homeowner in Timbercrest or Farview Hills in favor of having these 2 roads connected.
Will
37909
9-SC-24-C
Will (37909), September 11, 2024 at 9:27 AM
I understand the need for more housing but this proposed project is completely out of place compared to the surrounding neighborhoods. Entirely too many houses on small lots that don't fit in with the rest of the lots. Additionally, there is a lot of wildlife in those woods including coyotes, deer, all sorts of small mammals etc. that will be displaced because of this, has that been considered? Ultimately, we are destroying the beauty of this area that attracted so many to it in the first place by destroying the woods, there's already multiple development projects in this area why do we need another one?
Stephen
37909
9-SC-24-C
Stephen (37909), September 11, 2024 at 9:49 AM
Please find letter attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240911094955.pdf
Barry
37909
9-SC-24-C
Barry (37909), September 11, 2024 at 10:04 AM
I am a resident of Timbercrest neighborhood. I strongly oppose this development as currently proposed. My main objection is the proposed connection between Yosemite Trail and Farland Drive. This will provide a new corridor connecting, not only these two neighborhoods, but also other single- and multi-family developments further east, resulting in increased traffic by outsiders through our neighborhood. Our streets are heavily used by pedestrians and playing children. If the connection is considered essential for emergency access, I recommend a locked gate at the connection that can be opened only by emergency responders. In addition, the proposed site is steeply sloped and in an area of unstable soils. Additional studies (traffic, soil and geology) are needed to determine the "highest and best use" of this site. This development will do nothing to provide housing that is critically needed by low- and moderate-income people in our city.
Julio
37909
9-SC-24-C
Julio (37909), September 11, 2024 at 10:21 AM
As a neighbor of Timbercrest my concern is with the amount of homes planned. Ten homes with a good size plot for each, while conserving woodlands would be a better option. We purchased our home two years ago because of the appeal and community Timbercrest is. The homes have a great size yard for family activities and kids to play, the neighborhood is mostly sorrounded by woodlands which is amazing for noise pollution and the environment in general. The homes in Timbercrest, as do the ones in Far View Hills aren't exactly cookie cutter homes. They have their own "persona" which flows as a neighborhood. At the end of the day if a project goes forth it has to go forth with a serious look at large plots that eould allow for protection of some woods and give those potential families a yard for an improved quality of life. Contrary to the belief of many people, "lets just cram in as many homes as we can for profit" Homeowners want some distance, some privacy, some room. Knoxville has to be the standard bearer in doing things right, not falling for these proposals without taking more precautions in terms of environment, public safety and just the overall satisfaction of future residents. To circle back, growth is very important, but not while sacrificing woodlands, i know a proposal can be put forth that takes into consideration all factors. I hope that cool heads and a sound way forward prevail.
Daine
37909
9-SC-24-C
Daine (37909), September 11, 2024 at 10:59 AM
See attached for a letter from the Timbercrest Recreation Club (TRC aka the pool) to the planning commission
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240911105957.pdf
Scott
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Scott (37931), September 11, 2024 at 12:14 PM
I am concerned about the request for PR zoning with 6 du/ac. I am a licensed professional engineer in the State of Tennessee, and I have 29 years of fire protection experience. I practice as a fire protection engineer, and I believe that 6 du/ac under PR zoning does not allow for enough separation between dwelling to ensure fire safety for the development. Attached is a letter I have authored detailing why I believe this to be the case.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240911121413.pdf
Allison
37909
9-SC-24-C
Allison (37909), September 11, 2024 at 12:33 PM
Opposition Letter Attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240911123327.pdf
SUSAN
38301
9-SC-24-C
SUSAN (38301), September 11, 2024 at 12:53 PM
My family's home is at the end of Yosemite where the connector would be added, thus turning a quiet residential street into a thruway for traffic and diminishing the quality of life, creating a safety hazard, and reducing property values. Timbercrest has survived for many years with neighbors who look out for each other and keep connections even many years after leaving the neighborhood. By increasing traffic volume the integrity of the community will be compromised without any real benefit to the current homeowners. Thank you for your consideration.
Marsha
37909
9-SC-24-C
Marsha (37909), September 11, 2024 at 1:34 PM
We have lived on Farland drive for 25 years we move there because of the quiet safe neighborhood. We have a variety of families that live in our neighborhood from Seniors to new families with small children families that have pets that all like to walk in the safe confines of our neighborhood. The Proposal for the homes being built in Timbercrest Farland Drive was not listed as an access area. What has changed? If there are 21 homes built in that area that will increase traffic on Farland Drive to no less than an additional 42 to 50 vehicles per day and that's just speaking of residence that will most likely have two cars for each home Farland Drive and Tonalea cannot handle that kind of traffic much less be a safe place for families to walk pets children and strollers or our seniors to feel safe walking. Why are these homes not being built in the same proportion as the other homes and lots in both of these subdivisions? I'm not an architect I'm also not a developer but why can there not be an easement of trees left between these additions and existing properties? I am not against growth but let's be reasonable let's look at this from a safety standpoint at the least not just profit margin. This plan needs reconsideration of what goes on this property we all have a common goal peace and safety for our families.
Megan
37909
9-SC-24-C
Megan (37909), September 11, 2024 at 2:16 PM
As a resident of Timbercrest neighborhood, I am concerned about the effect of the proposed construction on the green spaces and wildlife which are a primary reason why I sought to live in this community. I support the increase of affordable housing, but it must be done in a way that does not destroy the natural beauty and resources that make Knoxville such a wonderful place to live. My hope is that this developer will work with the residents of surrounding communities to meet their concerns about the destruction of the forested area and the increased traffic in the neighborhood.
Paul
37909
9-SC-24-C
Paul (37909), September 11, 2024 at 2:44 PM
I am concerned that the retention pond adjacent to the pool and playground will be a breeding ground for mosquitoes. It should be located as far away from that area as possible or if possible, eliminated.
Matthew
37909
9-SC-24-C
Matthew (37909), September 11, 2024 at 2:47 PM
I am opposed to the current plan to connect our neighborhood roads to this new development. We have enough traffic from the Knoxville Raquet Club, Pilot Headquarters and City Hills Church already and exposing us to more new traffic from a new development would be devastating to the safety of our children and the integrity of our community established neighborhood. We deal with speeders and stop sign runners on a daily basis as it is and don’t need anymore safety concerns to our neighborhood.
Jackie
37909
9-SC-24-C
Jackie (37909), September 11, 2024 at 5:24 PM
I've lived in Timbercrest for the majority of my life, it is beautiful and calm, there isn't a better place for midday walks with friends/family or even your pets. Its charm is the quiet suburban energy where ever you look. The beauty of our neighborhood is the community and the simplistic charm of it. The new development will turn Timbercrest into a drive-through littered with speed bumps and signs every which way. The greenery decorating the end of blocks will be infested with massive bulldozers followed by cut and paste manufactured plastic houses. In the end, the development of these houses will lead to a destruction of property and peace that Timbercrest has held for years.
Claudia
37909
9-SC-24-C
Claudia (37909), September 11, 2024 at 5:35 PM
I address you, knowing that it is past the time you set for comment entries. However, I want to let you know that the construction of new expensive houses on the area where nature and animals can interact freely will cause an impact and devastation of their habitat. Not only that is what I want to address but safety, the construction will be really dangerous due to the area that is not completely flat. Also, the erosion and softness of its ground will put in danger new houses. You should reconsider these because there may be tons of claims against safety and damage concerns. What can be done? You can do walking trails that are nature friendly for the community. The construction also will damage the peace and quiet of the neighborhood for many months. We appreciate very much your time and attention!
Allyn
, Kno
9-SC-24-C
Allyn (, Kno), September 12, 2024 at 1:02 PM
Speaking for my family and myself, we oppose the plan to extend Yosemite into the planned addition to Far Vue Hills. 22 houses on 7 acres will be too densely populated. It result in changing the streets of Yosemite and Starmont into a thruway vastly increasing the traffic. It will result in changing the characteristics of Timbercrest in a negative way thus decreasing Timbercrest property values. We strongly oppose the plan.
Karen
37909
9-SB-24-C
Karen (37909), Submitted during the meeting
I am more in favor of townhouses than commercial development. I understand peoples concerns but something like a gas station or other in and out kind of market or store would be an eyesore and much more disruptive. I don't know if these will be for rent or purchase. Some nice landscaping would be nice so that they do not look barren or plain. I hope concerns can be adequately addressed. buyers often care for property more than renters but if a responsible management company can oversee it and sound issues are addressed it should be good.
Submitted during the meeting
Karen
37909
9-SB-24-C
Karen (37909), Submitted during the meeting
PS. We also discussed traffic patterns. The hill on Broome Rd. leading to Middlebrook is a blind hill and many people do drive too fast. Seems like a sign warning drivers to slow down would be advisable. Also if the entrance to the townhouses is just to the right of Middlebrook, drivers waiting to turn left into townhouses could be at risk from drivers who just turned right off Middlebrook. Hopefully all the Bennett place concerns were addressed. Sounds like protective barrier vegetation, soft lighting and traffic issues will be carefully considered.
Submitted during the meeting
Rana
37920
9-G-24-SU
Rana (37920), September 13, 2024 at 12:09 PM
As a homeowner that lives very close to Calvary Chapel, I and other neighbors have been negatively impacted by the increased traffic we have seen as the church has expanded. The church is located just off of a busy highway ramp on an already congested road in a residential area. Particularly on Sundays and Wednesday evenings when church lets out, there is a pronounced increase in traffic to the point that I struggle to find an opening to pull out of my driveway (which is within sight of the church property) onto john Sevier Hwy. As a resident and homeowner that neighbors the church, I am opposed to further expansion of this property unless the city manages increased negative traffic impacts with reasonable mitigations. Thank you.
Chad
37920
9-A-24-SU
Chad (37920), September 15, 2024 at 4:32 PM
This would be a great for the locals, an it'll help folks work an a lot more!
Henrietta
37931
9-G-24-RZ
Henrietta (37931), September 15, 2024 at 4:35 PM
It is quite disappointing that the case notes by the Planning Commission is approving the rezoning and development of the property. Development is great, however any incremental revenue to the county is not invested back into the infrastructure of the area. Karns/Hardin Valley areas have developed at an impetuous rate, with no consideration or parallel development of the roads and infrastructure. The traffic along single lane roads along Karns Valley Dr and W Emory Rd is absurd and most importantly a major safety issue in the event of an emergency - fire or medical etc. It is impossible to pass or to get into and out of subdivisions/driveways. Travel times to Middlebrook Pike/Hardin Valley Rd have tripled due to current growth. Further growth would not be beneficial to current or new residents. I live in the Brookhaven neighborhood, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to safely exit and enter my own home, and during morning and late afternoon hours it is impossible. Additionally, the building of townhomes currently being carried out along Karns Valley Dr has resulted in excess trash and ongoing noise. Further development in the area would exacerbate this situation and devaluing our property, diminishing greenery. This rezoning and development should not be approved! 
Jerry
37909
9-SC-24-C
Jerry (37909), September 15, 2024 at 11:59 PM
To Knoxville Planning Committee on the 9-C-24-C proposal to build 21 new houses and connect Yosemite trail to McFarland. I'm against the connecting of the roads, this would effect traffic flow through our neighborhood where our kids play and enjoy life. Like I said in my last comments to your board about any new developments in our wonderful city is to have sidewalks mandatory to help keep kid out of the roads, unless this committee "DOES NOT CARE ABOUT KIDS"? I also never received any sort of feedback from my last comments when you approved the last development off Lonas Road which is no more than a old horse and wagon road with no shoulders or sidewalks. I think you should at least have some sort of caned email to let the emailer know you received it. Please do not allow the 2 neighborhoods to be connected! Also do not allow all 21 houses to be build on the land, there are so many mature trees that would be destroyed and soil impact on the steep hillsides that could cause erosion problems and passably land slides due to soft soil. The trees are our best fried for keeping stable soil. Maybe they could build lesser houses and keep the soil stable!
Jamie
37909
9-SC-24-C
Jamie (37909), September 16, 2024 at 10:10 AM
Development of the hillside on the pool side could detrimentally affect the sightline and seclusion of the area and possibly the structure of the foundation. The developer selling said land has a history of razing the area to bare dirt before building leaving not a single tree and his actions would not reflect the needed attention to the stability and appearance of the wooded area. Tree canopy has been shown to reduce temperatures by 10-15 deg on hot sunny days. Removing a tree canopy would not be helpful to the affected area.
Benjamin
37920
10-A-24-SU
Benjamin (37920), September 16, 2024 at 11:31 AM
This application for a restaurant and butcher shop in the South Haven community has my full, unwavering support. I have lived at the above address for 7 years and have witnessed a lot of new people moving into the community, restoring houses, and introducing a cash infusion to the zip code, as a whole. As such, I feel the timing is perfect for such a business to open with a nearby and eager customer base. I look forward to Willy's being open soon and cannot wait to join my neighbors in welcoming this establishment to our neighborhood.