May 14, 2026
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

167 Comments for
Linda
37920
4-A-26-OB
Linda (37920), May 13, 2026 at 8:21 AM
Hello Planning Commissioners,
I appreciate the work that the developer of the Kerbela site (South Waterfront) has done to involve the community in their plans. However, more work needs to be done to make it better. This site is too visible and too important to not get this right. I respectfully ask you to please postpone tomorrow's decision to give the developer and the community more time to work together.
Thank you,
Linda R.[redacted]
4-A-26-OB
Amy (37920), May 13, 2026 at 7:22 AM
This project might seem to solve one problem (lack of available housing) but creates more problems. 1) Increasing traffic in an already congested area, 2) Inaccessibility for pedestrians to and by the surrounding community, 3) Lack of equitable access for persons with disabilities (which is especially important in a 55+ community), and 4) Disrespect for the community that thoughtfully planned for the future of South Knoxville. Surely there is another viable plan that doesn't create more issues.
Brianna
37920
4-A-26-OB
Brianna (37920), May 13, 2026 at 6:57 AM
We do NOT need any more development, apartments, etc. You all are crowding us who were born and raised in South Knox. I can barely get to work now without sitting in traffic or waiting on construction. All the development is actually ruining nature.
Nathan
37920
4-A-26-OB
Nathan (37920), May 12, 2026 at 11:17 PM
I am a life long South Knoxville resident and have watched our little corner of the scruffy city grow immensely the last 10 years. Responsible growth is a net positive for our city. However, I do not believe a 55+ apartment building fits the spirit of The South Waterfront long term goals.
Here is what I would like to see change in the plan:
1. Remove the age requirement. We need a diverse citizenry with young adults, families, and seniors. Age restrictions are a form of reverse discrimination and I do not think we should perpetuate the practice.
2. Require a public accessible overlook area to preserve the amazing view of downtown and the river for all to enjoy.
3. Require residents to use the Kay st access point and do not connect the parking lot to Mimosa or Sevier Ave. We need to continue building pedestrian friendly zones on Sevier Ave. and routing more cars that direction will go against this goal.
4. Limit surface parking. Require a garage or structure to avoid large paved areas that will trap heat.
5. Trees. Plant as many native trees as possible under the guidance of a qualified arborist.
Some of these items are addressed in the plan, but I want to reiterate their importance.
Lastly, in general, this development will be seen by Everyone looking across the river into South Knoxville. Please treat our home with as much care as we do and make it something we are proud of.
Joel and Lisa
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Joel and Lisa (37922), May 12, 2026 at 9:30 PM
We are writing to express our serious concern. We have lived on our property 40 years. Since that time we have watched as development has occurred all around us.
In previous years traffic on Triplett Lane was acceptable. Over the past few years it has increased significantly, causing congestion at the intersection with Kingston Pk, making entry/exit hazardous
First, we experienced the addition of homes added to adjoining property that was subdivided and built on, totally crowding up what was an open space. Most recently we have seen the addition of a 25 unit neighborhood situated on 7 acres built across from our property. While it's a nice development, the added traffic is very noticeable to all of us on this street.
We already deal with persons from up Triplett or coming in off Kingston Pike speeding up and down our little lane like it's an open highway.
The exponential increase in traffic this proposed development would bring causes us great alarm at best and puts all of us in danger at worst. Triplett Lane simply cannot handle any additional load.
In addition, this type of development strays far from the original intent of development for this area, which was to provide open areas of living with sizeable properties. This has already been diminished greatly, and with this proposed rezoning, would be lost completely.
We respectfully submit that our family does not support the application for rezoning, using Triplett Lane as an entry point.
Nancy S
37920
4-A-26-OB
Nancy S (37920), May 12, 2026 at 9:01 PM
The Board of Governors of the Island Home Park Neighborhood Association requests that the proposal be postponed to give the developer time to work with the City and the community to make sure the project meets the South Waterfront form based codes as well as the spirit of the Vision Plan. A traffic study is needed, also.
Cobren
37920
4-A-26-OB
Cobren (37920), May 12, 2026 at 8:52 PM
Hey folks,
Generally, I like development.
I don't want the design to be haphazard.
I think there have been some really important aspects that have not been considered. Especially pertaining to the south water front plans.
Please postpone the meeting so that there is sufficient time to review all the plans.
We can come up with something special, but we need to proceed with care.
Thank you, Cobren
Amanda
37849
5-I-26-RZ
Amanda (37849), May 12, 2026 at 7:08 PM
We have enough bad traffic and congestion with the interstate work. Bringing another shopping center to such a small area will only cause more issues for the people living off Heiskell.
Shannon
37849
5-I-26-RZ
Shannon (37849), May 12, 2026 at 5:30 PM
As a community member, I would not support this re-zoning. Powell has expanded so much in the past few years. Traffic is already an issue with the new housing developments. There are so many buildings in downtown Powell, Clinton Highway in the Powell area and north Emory Road that are vacant. These spaces have been vacant for a long time. It seems ridiculous to continue to leave these vacant buildings vacant while continuing to add new buildings and tear up land. The vacant spaces should be rebuilt/renovated before we continue to re-zone vacant land. I only forsee a time when the community size can't support the businesses it already has and more spaces end up being vacant because businesses can't make enough money.
Living off of Heiskell road, trying to get onto Emory and/or cross onto Central is already congested. Adding another shopping center would only make this worse. Additionally, the community is already building another space beside the library on Powell. Again this will only congest Emory Road worse than it already is. The Schools are already having re-zoning issues as it cant support the number of people in the area. These additional buildings would only compound this problem. Again I implore those with power to look at ways to use spaces already zoned commercial that are not being utilized before re-zoning.
Jeff
37920
4-A-26-OB
Jeff (37920), May 12, 2026 at 4:11 PM
I appreciate that the developers are open to adjustments, but we need to go further with this. I like how Gay and Kerns can be connected, but the building itself if so pitifully designed for Knoxville and its position on our city skyline. Break this building up, put a park overlooking the river, or make a tower to give height difference. Anything other than a 5 story mega block stretching the width of that hill. Knoxville has enough of those! Bring us something better that the city can be proud of at this downtown summit. And please be more intentional with the JFG sign if you are planning to utilize it.
Stephen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stephen (37920), May 12, 2026 at 4:03 PM
Attached are comments from City Church, a direct neighbor of the Kerbela development.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260512160324.pdf
Janie
37849
5-I-26-RZ
Janie (37849), May 12, 2026 at 3:57 PM
Vote No to rezoning. See attached.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260512155730.pdf
Marisa
37920
4-A-26-OB
Marisa (37920), May 12, 2026 at 3:34 PM
This new development will add a lot of value to South Knoxville, the waterfront, and the community overall. It seems the developer has even taken the community into consideration throughout this process such as bringing back the iconic JFG sign and providing walkways for easy access to other South Knox developments. I support the proposed development at 315 Kerbela Avenue and believe it would be a great addition to South Knox.
Joshua
37920
4-A-26-OB
Joshua (37920), May 12, 2026 at 3:23 PM
Hello, my name is Joshua H. I am a property owner and local developer who has built and owns a number of homes and developments in South Knoxville.
I am in favor of this development. We need to continue supporting new housing opportunities and local businesses along Sevier Avenue.
Adding a senior community will further cultivate the diverse age diversity and sense of community that makes South Knoxville such a special place.
Thank you.
4-A-26-OB
Amy (37923), May 12, 2026 at 3:05 PM
I was so excited to learn about the development of a 55+ community in downtown Knoxville. I respectfully request that the planning commission support this development.
This would allow my senior father the opportunity to downsize while remaining in the vibrant area he loves. He is a retired UT professor, and has invested and lived in downtown Knoxville for 40+ years. There are many like him who have invested in and live in the 4th and Gill and Park Ridge areas, and need to transition.
Regarding comments about increased traffic----this isn't student or young adult housing. Seniors are much less likely to drive. Professionally managed communities typically provide transportation via shuttles / small buses.
Cohl
37920
4-A-26-OB
Cohl (37920), May 12, 2026 at 2:55 PM
I am in full support of this development. For decades the property itself has provided little benefits to the general public and generated little revenue for the city, but that is about to change. This developer has clearly taken the South Knox community, and Knoxville as a whole, into consideration when designing these plans. The developer redesigned their project after 3 public meetings with the community (how many other developers in Knoxville have done that?). They have agreed to bring back the JFG sign, work with the city to provide walk ways leading to Kerns bakery (Kern's bakery owner has publicly states he is in full support of this development) and reduce the scale and size of the buildings after hearing public feedback. The site has serious topo and rock challenges that limit what a developer can do with the property which is why variances are needed. The shriner organization could have sold to a student housing developer or any other typical apartment developer but instead chose this buyer because they are building housing for seniors. The city has spent serious tax dollars on the bridge and sevier avenue street scape project. This project can help generate the revenue needed to pay that back.
Kevin
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kevin (37920), May 12, 2026 at 2:49 PM
I would like to share my support for the upcoming project at 315 Kerbela Avenue. I have called South Knoxville my home since 1981 when I started the 4th grade at Giffin Elementary School. I went to Giffin Elementary for 4th & 5th grade and then later on Graduated at South Young High School in 1989 while living on Earl Avenue.
I left for the United States Navy in 1989 and at that time South Knoxville was on the decline. Walking or riding a bike along Sevier Avenue was very dangerous , homes were not being maintained, and the area that I loved and called home had a very bad stigma. I would always here conversations of "stay out of South Knoxville".
Seeing the growth over the past 10 years and being able to be a part of the revitalization has brought me much joy and now seeing that South Knoxville is one of most desirable areas in Knoxville is amazing. I love going to Sevier Avenue to enjoy food & entertainment and I know that this new development will add so much value to South Knoxville, the waterfront, and the community overall.
Maggie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Maggie (37920), May 12, 2026 at 2:14 PM
I do not support the redevelopment in this proposed capacity and urge you to consider the viewscape. This architectural plan will not flow with the current vision for sevier ave and extends the already overly generic multistory development of the area to the west through chapman highway. Please consider requesting multi-use and multi-height development plans rather than two big tall blocks on this prominent Knoxville skyline location.
Aaron
37917
4-A-26-OB
Aaron (37917), May 12, 2026 at 1:43 PM
See attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260512134309.pdf
4-A-26-OB
Kat (37920), May 12, 2026 at 1:39 PM
I have sweet memories of sitting in the Shriners parking lot in the early morning of summer with my friends to watch the sunrise.
I love South knoxville. I think it's great that our community is expanding and so is the infrastructure to accommodate the community.
I love to see more spaces where all kinds of people from different walks of life can walk and bike around and enjoy nature and local businesses. This is the type of community and growth is something I want to be a part of.
This building plan seems squirrelly when it comes to working around city ordinances and has missed the mark of checking in with and hearing the voices of actual community ideas and opinions that will create the type of future we hope for in south knox.
Please don't sequester off this beautiful lot and turn it into something that keeps its residents separate. Please create a space where we can get to know residents and frequent local establishments and enjoy the view together.
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), May 12, 2026 at 1:13 PM
I request that this proposal be delayed for additional input from the community and revised plans from the developer. I appreciate the South Waterfront zoning and vision and this proposal does not meet those requirements. And we should have learned from several ugly buildings on the south side of the river that variances are bad.
This hilltop is an important part of downtown Knoxville and the booming South Knoxville waterfront area. I would like to see something that reflects the uniqueness and artfulness of the Knoxville community rather than another huge apartment building. Surely there can be a plan that includes a welcoming feel to the public rather than a private secluded area. Other cities have such prominent hills be an asset for all citizens. Please work with the developers to be more creative. Thank you.
Mary Beth
37920
4-A-26-OB
Mary Beth (37920), May 12, 2026 at 1:01 PM
This is one of the most important sites in Knoxville and absolutely no variances should be allowed. The code is in place for a reason and this site, above all others, should be held in 100% compliance.
Colton
37920
4-A-26-OB
Colton (37920), May 12, 2026 at 11:38 AM
I have concerns about the project's potential impact on parking availability and traffic flow in the surrounding neighborhood. With over 200 residential units and approximately 228-235 parking spaces proposed , I am concerned that the on-site capacity will not adequately meet demand, which could lead to overflow parking on nearby streets. Additionally, the increased vehicle traffic may place added strain on already constrained roadways and affect the safety and character of the neighborhood.
Nancy S
37920
4-A-26-OB
Nancy S (37920), May 12, 2026 at 11:07 AM
It is very important that this project comply with the South Waterfront codes. Since there are deficiencies in the proposal, this project should be postponed for the developer to work with the City and community groups to create a compliant project for such a prominent place.
I oppose including the use of the historic 'ghost steps' in any way. The steps should be preserved as an important beloved relic as they are. The property owner could/should apply for inclusion of the "steps to nowhere" on the National Registry of Historic Places. That would be a win/win because the property owner/developer would not have to include non-code compliant steps in the project while mollifying the citizens who demand that they be included.
Please postpone this.
Melanie
37918
4-A-26-OB
Melanie (37918), May 12, 2026 at 11:05 AM
I am writing in support of residential development at 315 Kerbela Ave, while raising specific concerns about the adequacy of the parking and traffic flow provisions in the current proposal.
The plan proposes 228-235 parking spaces for 217-223 residential units, approximately one space per unit. This ratio does not appear to account for visitor parking or real-world usage patterns, and the plan does not include a traffic or parking demand study to support these numbers. The shortfall in on-site parking will likely push resident and visitor vehicles onto the surrounding neighborhood streets.
This is a particular concern for Dawson St., where City Church Knoxville operates a parking lot that serves families with young children on Sunday mornings and throughout the week. The entrance to that lot is on Dawson St., and increased cut-through traffic or competition for street parking in this area would directly affect safe access for families dropping off and picking up children.
The transportation diagram also does not clearly address how traffic will flow to and from the site during peak hours, nor how delivery vehicles, moving trucks, and emergency access will be managed given the grade changes and limited street widths in this corridor.
We would ask that the planning commission require a traffic impact study and parking demand analysis as conditions of approval, with particular attention to the impact on Dawson St. and adjacent residential streets.
Davis
37919
4-A-26-OB
Davis (37919), May 12, 2026 at 8:56 AM
I support this project. i think it will be great for Knoxville at large & South Knoxville specifically.
Martha
37920
4-A-26-OB
Martha (37920), May 12, 2026 at 8:07 AM
From a design standpoint this could be improved by taking the west wing of the building (motel 6 design), moving it to the west and make it a tower which is allowed in the SW-6 zone. This would allow for a public plaza aligned with the Gay street bridge. The building could include a community room that can be open to the public on occasion like the Kerbela is now.
I like that this is geared to seniors but some seniors might prefer to live in a tower. It alleviates the monotony of the plan as presented. Most importantly it allows for a plaza with a sweeping vista of downtown that could be a showpiece for the city.
Alan
37920
4-A-26-OB
Alan (37920), May 11, 2026 at 9:35 PM
Please don't ignore or amend the rules set forth by planners for the South Waterfront. Allowance of a gated development with ignored setbacks is especially distasteful'
Karen
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Karen (37922), May 11, 2026 at 8:12 PM
I am a resident of the Woods at West Valley subdivision located off of George Williams Road. I am submitting this in opposition to the development being planned off George Williams rd. This area is already saturated and the roads cannot handle more traffic. It is becoming a safety issue with the amount of vehicles on George Williams and Fox roads.
Josh
37917
4-A-26-OB
Josh (37917), May 11, 2026 at 7:49 PM
I am not a resident of south Knoxville currently, and haven't been in about 15 years. I have lived in Knoxville since 2005, and have seen quite a bit of change in this city. Much of this change has been good, but much has not. A trend in the past several years has been to allow developments like this, and I do not believe this has been positive. I have been relatively pleased by the sprucing up Sevier Ave has received, and I believe this development would NOT be a positive addition, in fact quite the opposite. As such, I hope that this variance is not approved and that this project is not approved.
Mark
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Mark (37922), May 11, 2026 at 7:47 PM
My comments are attached. It includes commentary of both the Staff Recommendation and the new Applicant Correspondence submitted today.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260511194704.pdf
Deborah
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Deborah (37922), May 11, 2026 at 7:11 PM
I am unable to attend this meeting but feel strongly that this application be denied. George Williams has already taken on much more traffic in recent years and this development would be very dangerous. George Williams road is narrow and hilly making it unable to take on a development of this size. There is very heavy traffic during school hours as it carries traffic to West Valley Middle school. I live right next to the proposed site and it is very difficult to make a left during school morning hours as well as when school lets out. Environmentally, the loss of the vegetation is concerning. All the new developments in the nearby area has made the traffic on the Pellissippi Parkway audible from my home. Removing all of the trees on this beautiful property would only make this worse.
Thank you so much for considering my concerns!
Applicant
5-J-26-RZ
Applicant Correspondence
May 11, 2026 at 3:42 PM
Attached please find correspondence regarding 5-J-26-RZ.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260511154226.pdf
applicant
Lindsey
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lindsey (37920), May 11, 2026 at 3:31 PM
The South Waterfront Vision Plan was created through extensive public engagement, and projects on major gateway sites like this should uphold that vision.
This development is too large and exceeds the intended block size. Its setbacks and gated design isolate it from the surrounding community, conflicting with the connectivity and accessibility goals of the Vision Plan and form-based code. The project also lacks pedestrian engagement. There is no ground-floor retail, and large blank walls and parking garage frontage create an inactive and potentially unsafe pedestrian environment at night.
Additionally, there has been no traffic study presented for a project of this scale, and there appears to be little meaningful public access to the property. I urge the Planning Commission to seriously consider the concerns and recommendations of the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy group before approving this project.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260511153142.pdf
Kent
37918
4-A-26-OB
Kent (37918), May 11, 2026 at 1:47 PM
I love that South Knoxville continues to grow through commercial and residential development. However, from what I've seen, it does not appear that there is anywhere close to adequate parking allotted for this particular development. Until someone can solve that issue (which is already a massive issue along Sevier Ave), I am not in favor of the development.
Further congestion without solutions is not a net win for the Old Sevier community.
Applicant
5-R-26-RZ
Applicant Correspondence
May 11, 2026 at 1:31 PM
Attached please find correspondence regarding 5-R-26-RZ.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260511133151.pdf
applicant
James /Kelly
37909
5-B-26-SU
James /Kelly (37909), May 11, 2026 at 1:22 PM
We live behind the back of the church and their parking lot. Our only request would be the lighting used for the new lot would the type that directs light more downward. The lights in their parking lot now are very bright and visible to us and our neighbors. Also, there is a large LED light on the carport for the church vehicles that "aims" directly out at our house.
All of this became much more evident after a sub contractor for KUB cut down a large swath of trees that protected us from church lights and interstate noise. The church is a good neighbor and never causes noises.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260511132214.pdf
Kevin
37918
4-A-26-OB
Kevin (37918), May 11, 2026 at 1:11 PM
Knox Community Planning Alliance agrees and concurs with the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group request to postpone so they can continue to work with the developer on this project.
Melissa
37917
4-A-26-OB
Melissa (37917), May 11, 2026 at 11:13 AM
A comment critique of public engagement on development projects is that it fails to engage potential residents who would benefit from the project, biasing against the project. I would love to live in this area in a 55+ community (I'm currently eligible and very interested!) that is designed for pedestrian, bus and bicycle transportation. I would go car-free if I lived there. I am a potential future beneficiary of a Yes on this. I disagree with the comments that raise the issue of traffic or assert no more multi-family housing should be built.
However, I agree with the points raised in many of these comments about the visual prominence of the site and its importance to future designs according with the VP. I support the statement submitted by the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group on May 10.
I want to live here, but I want it to be as good for the community as possible because I want my future neighborhood to be strong, knitted together, and appreciative of the building where I live.
Kathleen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kathleen (37920), May 11, 2026 at 10:16 AM
Please heed the South Knoxville community's plea for a slowdown on this process. The code was created for a reason, and many citizens worked very hard to help us plan for the future. This undue haste is a slap in the face to all those citizens. We're pleased that the developers have (upon prodding) been willing to meet with residents and adjust plans somewhat. More needs to be done. Thank you! Katie H.
Maddi
37849
5-S-26-RZ
Maddi (37849), May 10, 2026 at 9:29 PM
I seriously cannot believe you/they whoever is trying to put more neighborhoods and businesses in Powell when it takes me over 30 minutes to get to places that used to take me about 7 minutes. Wasn't there a rule about leaving Powell drive alone? Powell needs areas to breathe and untouched and at least part of a road that doesn't have traffic and that's Powell drive. Do you live in Powell? Do you have to deal with the traffic EVERYDAY that's bound to cause accidents? No?? Then you should experience it. Just because you don't deal with it shouldn't mean we the people in Powell have to. I miss my small town Powell and now I'm starting to feel like I live in California which is crazy because this is TENNESSEE. Just because you see a piece of land you shouldn't look at it and see money from building. You should see what's left of the beautiful creation God made because we all know there ain't much of it left around here. Nature heals. Neighborhoods and businesses don't. I'd rather see a new Powell elementary school built here that you all claim Powell doesn't have the room for. Well here you go there's the room! NO MORE NEIGHBORHOODS OR BUSINESSES IN POWELL!!!!!
Natasha
37849
5-S-26-RZ
Natasha (37849), May 10, 2026 at 4:28 PM
This is absolutely 100% unacceptable. Powell is not a huge community and we like to have the small town feel. I personally live in the neighborhood that is immediately off of the round-a-bout you propose to build off of and this would be an incredibly horrible inconvenience. This would drastically increase traffic, create more noise and remove the peaceful county setting that those of us who live in this neighborhood greatly love.
Connie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Connie (37920), May 10, 2026 at 2:26 PM
As a resident of South Knoxville, I urge you to postpone this item to allow for more time for conversations and collaborations between the community and the developers, CR-Endeavors. More time for meaningful negotiations will contribute to making sure this extraordinary property is developed in a manner that conforms to and honors the South Waterfront Vision Plan.
Please carefully the review and consider the recommendations of the South Waterfront Advisory and and Advocacy Group. This group has done the "hard lifting" representing and listening to the community's concerns.
Thank you for your service to our community.
4-A-26-OB
Tim (37920), May 10, 2026 at 12:30 PM
Please do not allow this building to be built at this site. As a lifelong south Knoxville resident who grew up in Island Home and still lives here, South Knoxville is extremely important to me and the city of Knoxville is as well. I believe that this plot of land would serve the city much better as a park, art center, community center, over-look botanical garden etc..ANYTHING but another apartment building. We have way too many apartment buildings going up in south Knoxville and it is ruining the place that I have called home since the 60's. I ask again that you please reconsider what can be built at this site, as this has the potential to help and benefit the community if the right decision is made. Thank you for your time.
Louise
37920
4-A-26-OB
Louise (37920), May 10, 2026 at 9:52 AM
I respectfully request to postpone so that the community can keep working with the developer on design elements that don't meet the objectives and intent of the Vision Plan and SW code.
Katherine
37920
4-A-26-OB
Katherine (37920), May 10, 2026 at 9:50 AM
I want to request that you postpone the next step in the process of deciding what to do about the Kerbela Temple site and its eventual fate. More time is needed so that the community and the developer can continue working on proposed design elements that currently don't meet the objectives and intent of the Vision Plan and the southwest-Knoxville code.
Thank you,
Katherine H.
Stewart
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stewart (37920), May 10, 2026 at 8:07 AM
The applicant was fully aware of the South Waterfront Form Based Code when they developed their plan. They chose to ignore that code. Hours of work by many community members went into developing this code. Once we allow variances it will be harder to deny the next request. Soon the code will not matter at all and the next time the city asks for community input it will be met with little or no response.
Please deny these variances for the Kerbela site.
Debbie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Debbie (37920), May 10, 2026 at 6:48 AM
This area does not have the infrastructure to support more housing. With the location and the closure of the Gay Street Bridge, 90% of traffic created by this development will use Henley Street. Henley Street is already a source of extreme traffic congestion. This will make that substantially worse.
Rachel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37920), May 10, 2026 at 12:32 AM
Attached are comments from the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group. Individual signatures are the end of the document.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260510003227.pdf
Mike
37920
4-A-26-OB
Mike (37920), May 9, 2026 at 11:39 AM
See attachment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260509113914.pdf
Janis
37918
5-F-26-RZ
Janis (37918), May 9, 2026 at 7:59 AM
This change in zoning to 4.7 du/ac is not supported by the roads adjacent to the development. Bishop and Tate Trotter are narrow roads that will have difficulty supporting this additional traffic. Additionally, what are the enrollment capacities of the schools affected? Are the schools at capacity or is there room for these additional students. This should definitely be taken into account given the problems with the Bell Town development and it's impact on Powell Elementary School which resulted in the rezoning situation.
Annabel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Annabel (37920), May 7, 2026 at 11:02 PM
I reside and work in South Knoxville and traverse the area around the proposed apartment site daily. The Sevier avenue corridor has been through a lot of changes over the past few years, but the proposed apartment complex on the Kerbela temple site is beyond overwhelming in the many ways it does not follow the South Waterfront plan. Additionally, the lack of consideration for the community is quite concerning. The sheer size of the complex in and of itself is the most distressing part of the proposal. The additional vehicle traffic it will bring to an already overwhelmed area is potentially crippling to the community. And there is no benefit that I have seen for the community.
Please put the brakes on this and encourage the developers to follow the code, follow the recommendations of the South Waterfront Advisory Group and have some consideration for our community. Thank you
Mary
37849
5-D-26-PA
Mary (37849), May 7, 2026 at 10:39 PM
We the owners of the property at 7629 Heiskell RD are very much OPPOSED to this rezoning for a shopping center. Our property line is only a few feet from 7625 where this rezoning ends. We do not wish our property to be connected to a shopping center. Not only will it decrease our property but will raise our taxes and bring more crime and safety issues. Heiskell Rd can not handle the traffic now with residents having difficulty getting out of their driveways and area subdivisions that exit onto Heiskell. This would create more of a traffic congestion as it is only a 2 lane road. Heiskell Rd has always been a residential area and we wish it to remain Residential. No shopping center should even be considered past 500ft from Emory Rd.
PLEASE SAY NO TO THIS REZONING!!!!
Joseph
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Joseph (37924), May 7, 2026 at 5:59 PM
I am deeply concerned about the impact this proposed development could have on both my property and our community as a whole. As a property owner on Kitts Road adjacent to this proposed development, I am especially concerned about how this will directly affect my property, privacy, and quality of life. I also worry about increased traffic, strain on local schools and infrastructure, environmental disruption, drainage concerns, and the overall change to the character of our area. Growth should be thoughtful and responsible, and I do not feel the long-term impact on current residents has been adequately addressed.
4-A-26-OB
Dan (37920), May 7, 2026 at 1:52 PM
See attached pdf for comments
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260507135253.pdf
Grant
37902
5-H-26-RZ
Grant (37902), May 7, 2026 at 1:33 PM
See attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260507133325.pdf
Mary
37849
5-D-26-PA
Mary (37849), May 7, 2026 at 11:12 AM
We the property owners of 7629 Heiskell Rd are strongly opposed to this rezoning. This proposed shopping center would greatly affect us as our property line is connected to the 7625 property where shopping center ends. We do not wish to be fronted by said shopping center. Not only would it be an eyesore it would increase our taxes, result in more traffic congestion for an already congested area for us and other residents on Heiskell Rd and area subdivisions. This is a residential area and we wish to keep it Residential. We do not need a shopping center on Heiskell Rd, we have more than enough on Emory Rd. Please keep Heiskell Rd Residential and Say No to this rezoning!!
Julia
37918
5-A-26-DP
Julia (37918), May 6, 2026 at 5:24 PM
Hi. My name is Julia M. I live in Hidden Brook subdivision. My property backs up to the property that is proposed for townhome development. I am very concerned about our property value, traffic and scenery if this moves forward. I ask you to please consider not allowing this development. Due to the heavy traffic that we already have on East Beaver Creek and how hard it is to turn out of our subdivision now. I also don't want this to decrease our homes property value. We love having our backyard with the trees and the undeveloped land for the birds and the wildlife and serenity. If this has to be developed, please lower the number of town homes that are being considered. I also request that the developer leave a tree line between our properties in Hidden Brook subdivision that are on Hannah Brook Rd and Berkford Rd to help keep some serenity and not disturb all of the wildlife in the area.
Robert
37932
5-D-26-DP
Robert (37932), May 6, 2026 at 4:36 PM
This proposal flies in the face of both Knox County's Hillside and Ridgetop Protection Plans Guidelines and Best Practices, and Tennessee Technology Corridor's own Guidelines, from site disturbance, impervious area ratio, ground coverage area, setback, and ridgetop protection just to name a few. I know the TTC Development Authority was dissolved but the rules are still in effect and the planning staff within the TO is responsible for enforcement. Why make regulations at all if they can be ignored for the profit of sole individuals.
If Knox County's own rules are not enough then please consider the safety of the citizenry; unmitigated development on a small county road like Bob Gray has already increased traffic exponentially. As a citizen who lives on this road and has seen more wrecks on my property and responded to injuries and deaths from car wrecks, I pray the reviewing staff considers the already increased pressure the existing development will have, and for any number of legal reasons deny this project from going forward.
Please just Google both ridgetop protection plan and Tennessee Technology Corridor for Knox County's own documents and rules.
Thomas
37922
4-B-26-RZ
Thomas (37922), May 6, 2026 at 2:23 PM
Attached is a letter from the project engineer following a conversation between the engineer and Knox County Engineering & Public Works regarding the access to the site being off Kitts road.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260506142359.pdf
Lindsey
37902
5-G-26-RZ
Lindsey (37902), May 6, 2026 at 1:44 PM
Please see attached correspondence and objection to rezoning application on behalf of adjacent property owners Phillip and Janet Cruze.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260506134421.pdf
Joel
37921
4-A-26-OB
Joel (37921), May 6, 2026 at 11:26 AM
Whatever gets built on Kerbela Hill will dominate the view from almost everywhere downtown. The current plan looks like a prison crossed with a second-rate Motel 6, looming over a city that deserves far better. Knoxville deserves beautiful architecture that fits the character of downtown. This is not it.
The community already made the feedback clear: a site this visible cannot look like crap. Adding a pathway through the middle of the monstrosity does not fix the fact that it still looks like crap. This is not some cheap apartment complex in the middle of nowhere being peddled as luxury. It is one of the most important pieces of land in the city, and treating it this carelessly is insulting.
Deny this design. Hold the developers and the city to a higher standard. Build something on that hill that makes people look down Gay Street in wonder or at the very least, not in disgust.
Douglas
37917
4-A-26-OB
Douglas (37917), May 6, 2026 at 10:45 AM
These plans are terrible. I agree with a previous comment which states that planning needs to insist on SW-5 and SW-6 zoning rules be complied with. There are very good reasons for these rules that were discussed with and approved by the community. This is an important and very prominent location that deserves special attention and long term thinking. I also didn't see any traffic planning associated with this development or reasoning why an active retirement community needs to be placed on top of a hill. Are there no more flat, street level locations in all of Knoxville?
Jessica
37932
5-D-26-DP
Jessica (37932), May 6, 2026 at 8:31 AM
The fact that Arcip Horobet is attempting to develop what is left of the established trees on this property is absurd and shows that his priority is dollar signs and nothing else. This area is designated "HILLSIDE PROTECTION" - which is NEEDED for erosion and stormwater control. The planning commission already allowed him to develop significantly more than the recommended "protected" allotment of this property. If his request is granted and the remaining protected land is destroyed, Arcip Horobet and the approving planning committee members should be held PERSONALLY responsible for any surrounding water/ damage that results from the development of this land. Please, for once, have some consideration for the potential impacts of this decision. Have some integrity. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Brittany
37917
4-A-26-OB
Brittany (37917), May 5, 2026 at 10:22 PM
Please do not approve this development. It adds absolutely no character to Knoxville and will further degrades the city scape. The design needs to be completely redone.
Eric
37932
4-A-26-OB
Eric (37932), May 5, 2026 at 9:18 PM
What astonishingly boring design. This design will not age well, and in 15 years it's going to look terribly out of date. Knoxville needs to require the developer to come up with something a wee bit more interesting than two U-shaped six story buildings. Let's be known as a city with interesting architecture, not cookie cutter garbage.
Rose
37849
5-D-26-PA
Rose (37849), May 5, 2026 at 8:06 PM
I am not in favor of the rezoning, The traffic already causes problems getting in and out of my property on Heiskell Road, I do not believe that a shopping center is needed in this area,
Paul
37849
5-D-26-PA
Paul (37849), May 5, 2026 at 5:40 PM
There is no need for more shopping mallls in this area we have plenty. The roads can't handle the traffic now. Unable to get out of neighborhoods. If the area is rezoned it will make the taxes higher. We moved here to get out of the city and traffic. Vote NO
5-O-26-RZ
Jan (37920), May 5, 2026 at 10:36 AM
I am concerned about the increased traffic load and the nasty pond.
Please check for environmental hazards from the pond which is covered in scum.
Thank you
Mandy
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Mandy (37922), May 4, 2026 at 9:33 PM
Thank you for taking our comments. We request that you please reconsider this proposed zoning change. We understand Knox County needs additional housing, but we are very concerned that the proposed neighborhood, especially its density, could significantly impact already strained resources in this area by further pushing the limits of schools/bus capacity, increasing traffic congestion and risk to George Williams Rd., increasing audible noise from Pellissippi, and degrading the natural tree-lined landscape of our community.
Pleases see PDF attached with more detail to our concerns.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260504213355.pdf
Meghan
37932
5-C-26-DP
Meghan (37932), May 4, 2026 at 5:22 AM
We've lived in this neighborhood since October of 2012, the whole point of why we moved to an established neighborhood was because there wouldn't be any further development to its current layout. Additionally, a huge selling feature was the cul-de-sac, where our kids could play safely! Throwing a postage stamp house with a slab for a driveway will most certainly create parking overflow into the 'street' of our neighborhood. When the home beside us was being remodeled, that entire cul-de-sac was overtaken by construction workers. I got nails in my tires, my trash didn't get picked up, my mail didn't get delivered and packages weren't brought to our home because of the obstruction from the crew. Building a home from the ground up is going to create a problem in a tenfold matter. Please, please reconsider this. I don't understand how this could benefit anyone living here. There are more then enough homes and developments around, why change an established neighborhoods layout ??
Erika
37924
5-SB-26-C
Erika (37924), May 3, 2026 at 8:53 PM
PLEASE do not build this subdivision ¦ this area is already going to be OVERCROWDED with the new apartments and townhouses and no adjustments made to strawberry plains pike or any roads around it.
This is has been my home for 26 years and my parents for even longer€¦ I beg of yall to PLEASEEE stop this development or take it somewhere else that can actually HANDLE the traffic of this.
Jillian
37920
5-K-26-RZ
Jillian (37920), May 3, 2026 at 6:43 PM
See Attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260503184320.pdf
Erin
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Erin (37922), May 1, 2026 at 2:19 PM
I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding the continued approval of high-density developments along George Williams Road, Fox Road, and Emory Church Road. While development continues to accelerate, there has been a noticeable lack of concurrent infrastructure or traffic flow improvements. Our local roads—which remain narrow, rural routes—are being overwhelmed by volume they were never designed to handle. Please see attached PDF with more specific concerns.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260501141907.pdf
Brittney
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Brittney (37924), April 30, 2026 at 7:23 PM
We do not need added traffic in this area. Just look at the traffic accidents that have occurred nearby in the past year or even in the past month. This will make our roads even more unsafe as we do not have the infrastructure for this.
Steven
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Steven (37922), April 30, 2026 at 1:39 PM
Regarding the proposed rezoning of the property at 9857 George Williams Rd., the primary argument against the proposed unit density of 5 du/acre is that this would add 150 to 200 new residences to the area at the intersection of George Williams Rd. with Fox Rd. which would also bring approximately 300 to 400 new vehicles into an already congested area for traffic. There is already one neighborhood going in right at the George Williams - Fox Rd intersection and now this proposed development would add even more homes within 1/4 mile of the same intersection.
I propose two items for this project to be approved: 1. a reduction in the allowable residences per acre to a maximum of 3, and 2. even with such a prudent reduction, that the commission approve the construction of a traffic circle at the intersection of George Williams and Fox to facilitate the ease of movement of associated traffic. Further, that the traffic circle will be completed prior to any construction being allowed on the property in question. And, no, a traffic light is not a realistic or acceptable solution. That would be entirely inappropriate and more conducive to traffic jams and hassles than a traffic circle for the movement of vehicles on George Williams and Fox roads as well as making it more convenient for school buses to navigate the intersection.
Frank
37849
5-D-26-PA
Frank (37849), April 30, 2026 at 1:10 PM
Heiskell road can not handle the traffic now. We don't need another burger place & get the nails done. Vote NO!
KAYLA
37871
4-B-26-RZ
KAYLA (37871), April 29, 2026 at 11:12 PM
The rezoning is unwanted by local residence! Stop trying to make money off our area while not even contributing to upgrades to help the area.
Todd
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Todd (37924), April 29, 2026 at 10:29 PM
As a longtime resident of the Carter Mill community I am strongly against the rezoning at Kitts RD/ Pleasant Hill RD for development. We value the quiet community we live in and raise our families in. I understand the need for growth, but this area has experienced way too much in a short period of time. I don't consider building jack in the box houses on top of each other and as many as you can cram in an acre sensible or responsible growth. Please listen to the people of this community and vote against the rezoning - WE DONT WANT IT.
Henry
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Henry (37922), April 29, 2026 at 10:00 PM
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed subdivision. The current plan raises serious concerns about traffic safety and congestion that do not appear to be adequately addressed.
The development would significantly increase traffic volume in an area that is already constrained by limited road capacity. In particular, the proposal to create a through street connecting a major roadway to an existing two-lane road is problematic. This change is likely to redirect a substantial amount of cut-through traffic into a roadway that is not designed to handle higher volumes or speeds, increasing the risk of congestion, accidents, and delays.
Additionally, there does not appear to be sufficient traffic impact analysis demonstrating that the surrounding infrastructure can safely and efficiently accommodate the projected increase in vehicles. Without clear mitigation measures such as road widening, traffic calming strategies, or signal improvements, the proposal places an undue burden on current residents and commuters.
For these reasons, I urge the planning commission to deny or reconsider the subdivision proposal until a comprehensive traffic study is conducted and meaningful infrastructure improvements are included to address these concerns.
Debbie
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Debbie (37922), April 29, 2026 at 6:59 PM
I would like this project to be reconsidered. I am very concerned about the significant traffic to George Willams road. Adding this traffic to a road close to a school is a problem plus the road is very narrow and dangerous especially at night. Please do not approve this!
Donna
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Donna (37922), April 29, 2026 at 6:49 PM
I am very concerned about the high density housing you plan on building. Our roads just can't handle it, we already have a hard time turning left into George Williams off of Brooke Valley Blvd. We already have all the other high density housing coming in off Fox Rd. This will increase traffic coming in from Kingston Pike also. I oppose this Rezoning!
Spenser
37920
5-J-26-RZ
Spenser (37920), April 29, 2026 at 11:05 AM
To address those who have commented on this for clarification: this is an additional request for higher density on a development that is already happening right next to SDHS. It seems like it will add 6 more houses to the 70ish already approved. I live directly behind this and have to drive through it.
The problem is not that 6 houses is a huge difference or added pressure to the community in and of itself. The problem is when you approve a few 10 different times it takes a toll. This also seems like a work around in the system through which CMH approached the community with a plan which almost no one liked or wanted. It was approved despite about 90 negative public comments and provable deference to the previously voted on sector plan for south Knox. We continue to approve development while skipping needed infrastructure. Then after what was seemingly a good faith attempt to make us feel better about the development we didn't want here we are 2 years later asking to up the number even more. It's a bad look to sit before a community and say here's what we are doing and then go back on it because there was a marker downturn and your margins went down.
Commissioners, we are not anti-growth as a community. We are anti-irresponsible growth. 6 houses won't break anything. Blindly approving the requests of privatized money projects will.
Linda & Richard
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Linda & Richard (37922), April 28, 2026 at 8:24 PM
Our property is adjacent to this proposed development. Lot sizes in our neighborhood are 1/3 acre minimum. This proposed developments density of 5 du/ac is not consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods. It will put more traffic on George Williams Rd. and make turning left more dangerous. Higher density housing is more concerning to us than the fact that the land is being developed for residential purposes. We'll miss seeing the beautiful horses in the pasture and the wild turkeys strolling in our backyard.
Philip
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Philip (37922), April 28, 2026 at 6:41 PM
The applicant has requested rezoning of the entire 48.24 acres of the parcel at 5 dwelling units per acre, or 241 dwellings.
1. Access to the new residential development on the rezoned property should be limited to George Williams Road only. The applicant's parcel includes a 25 foot wide strip, a portion of an existing driveway, which extends approximately 1600 feet north and east to the terminus of Triplett Lane. Neither this 25 foot wide strip nor a combination of it with the parallel 25 foot strip to an adjacent parcel should ever be utilized to develop a public road to connect with or extend Triplett Lane to the new residential development.
2. The density is too high. It is very likely that when we finally see the site plan, only the southern slope near George Williams Road, approximately 34 acres, will be utilized for residential development, leaving the current owner's house, stables and pasture separated. At the allowed 241 dwellings, the new residential development would thus have a density 7.1 du/ac. The overall density should be reduced to a maximum of 4 du/ac.
Nicole
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Nicole (37922), April 28, 2026 at 4:47 PM
I am extremely opposed to this proposition in relation to the lack of infrastructure that is needed to sustain such population and traffic. George Williams and Fox Road cannot handle such traffic. This would be a disaster. Not to mention, the schools in this area cannot effectively incorporate an increase in population of this magnitude. Please consider denying this request. Sometimes common sense should supersede financial gain. At the very least take in consideration of advancing the infrastructure before hand.
Dixie
37922
5-R-26-RZ
Dixie (37922), April 28, 2026 at 3:16 PM
Dear Planning Commission
Many of us in Hidden Glen are a little alarmed at this proposed zoning change. 48 acres at 5 or even 4 per acre is way too many cars for two lane George Williams. With two entrance/exits on either side of Hidden Glen the amount of traffic created will invite backups or collisions on GW. The proposal also looks to connect the back of the property to Triplett Lane to Kingston Pike which would create a very busy pass through type shortcut to George Williams from all directions. I know people need places to live, but please vote No without clear upgrades, much less density and widening of affected roads
Jennifer
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Jennifer (37924), April 28, 2026 at 10:04 AM
Attached is the updated petition with over 1020 signatures and comments. Please take time to read these comments to better understand the community. thoughts on this rezoning.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260428100401.pdf
Sandy
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Sandy (37924), April 27, 2026 at 4:33 PM

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260427163351.pdf
Chris
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Chris (37924), April 27, 2026 at 3:11 PM
As we fast approach the meeting on May 14, I wanted to share community views on this rezoning in the hope you will consider the voice of the people of the community. This development does not fit the character of any other development in the immediate area. Designed to maximize developers return on investment, no matter the negative impact on the community.
Traffic impact from the report for this development says 1270 additional cars daily, which has to be something that impacts the area in an extremely negative way. The traffic study attached shows this rezoning would result in 1270 average daily impact with a yield of 13 students on the schools. This is far below the impact this will have if this rezoning is approved by the Planning Commission
All is on an attached PDF form.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260427151143.pdf
5-I-26-RZ
Ron (37949), April 25, 2026 at 1:37 PM
I'm a property owner North of the property trying to get rezoned, I wanna know if this is for Apartments,Condos or Strickly A Shopping Crnter?
Also what shops are planning on going in there?
I have a big concern with parking and commercial buildings being so close to my propertywith the loud noise not knowing if a band plays outside and heavy traffic backing up flow of traffic on heiskell road so we can't get out of our driveway?
Also what about my taxes going up years from now if they get it rezoned to commercial, I don't want higher taxes this has been residential on heiskel off emory for years and shouldn't go past 500-800ft from emory
William
37849
4-B-26-RZ
William (37849), April 25, 2026 at 12:00 AM
Listen to the citizens of rhe county that you are charged with representing. It is not hard to decipher where the community sentiment lies regarding this project, in terms of traffic, school overcrowding, preservation of the rural character, population density. It is obvious 1270 additional vehicles in daily traffic cannot be ignored, but will likely be pushed aside to pass the unwanted development. A developer buying property does NOT give them a God given right or a free pass from the commission. When you all take a stand that supportd your citizens then developers will be less willing to buy property for mass development if there is uncertainty of outcomes. If you all do more of what typically happens, another approval, citizens should see your removal from office and new appointments of the planning committee by the new mayor will at least have a fair shake chance of stopping this and other developments all over the county. We are full, traffic is a horrendous mess, whats done is done, the mess was approved by you all with blinders on apparently. Do something right in the eyes of your citizens versus approving an out of states developer's plan to cause more issues than we are already facing across the entire county. We are eager to see what you all do. The vegas odds are not in favor of the concerned citizens,.but only you the commission body can do what is right. See what you do on this.
Mark
37920
5-O-26-RZ
Mark (37920), April 21, 2026 at 3:17 PM
please assess property before approving rezoning. please have traffic study and also school capacity at mt olive
property has large pond ? environmental study would need to be looked at for safety of neighbors. ? run off ? retention pond.
Andrew
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Andrew (37924), April 20, 2026 at 8:43 AM
Please see attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260420084332.pdf
Alex
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Alex (37924), April 19, 2026 at 11:08 AM
The community is against this project. The reasons have been given over and over why this is a bad location. The future of this rural area belongs to the people that live there and love it. Vote no to this developers plan and vote for the people.
Deborah
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Deborah (37871), April 18, 2026 at 8:54 AM
I am against the rezoning of this property for this specified use. It is located in a small rural community and accessed by a very narrow road which could not handle the additional traffic. I vote NO to this and request it remain agricultural or single family homes.
David
37939
4-A-26-OB
David (37939), April 16, 2026 at 2:19 PM
Please consider the traffic this causes. The roads are already overloaded in this area due to recent developments that did not take this into consideration. Parking is also a problem with the developments there now. The neighborhood and businesses in this area do not deserve to suffer more of this problem. We need adequate infrastructure and parking and what is there now is not sufficient to handle this or even what was done prior to this. Please be a responsible government and due what is fair to all involved directly or indirectly. Thankyou for your attention, David
5-J-26-RZ
Pat (37920), April 15, 2026 at 7:44 PM
We do not need any more housing development in South Knox county-especially in that area! We don't have any infrastructure to support this development. The South Doyle High School is already over crowded and the traffic is bad now.
Quit selling out South Knoxville!
Kelly
d 379
5-J-26-RZ
Kelly (d 379), April 15, 2026 at 5:32 PM
These developers are destroying our town. How in the world did our beautiful community end up with a $300,000.00 Trailer Park on Tipton Station Rd? The developers are pushing out cheaply made housing and when these homes began to fall apart who's going to clean that mess up? I wish we could make developers live in a home they built.
Joyce
37920
5-J-26-RZ
Joyce (37920), April 15, 2026 at 5:22 PM
We need more infrastructure,-- schools, roads- before we get more houses. Too much traffic now. Do more planning instead of building.
Kristi
37853
5-J-26-RZ
Kristi (37853), April 15, 2026 at 4:36 PM
My family and I disagree with more subdivisions, condos, ect being built in South Knoxville. John Sevier Hwy is so over crowded now along with Chapman hwy. Our county roads are not in the best of shape and can't handle even more traffic. We have already way too many subdivisions coming our direction that South knox family did not want nor ask for.
Marie
37920
5-J-26-RZ
Marie (37920), April 15, 2026 at 3:41 PM
My concerns regarding the building of single-family homes on 7611 Sycamore Breeze Rd.
South side of Tipton Station Rd, east of Sycamore Breeze Rd are the following:
-Schools: Can South Doyle Middle School, South Doyle High School and Bonny Kate Elementary School support the new influx of children? If not, what is being done to make sure there is no overcrowding to these schools?
-Roads: John Sevier Highway is already overcrowded. What are the plans to accommodate the traffic that this new community will create?
Our small area is already overcrowded. We do not need new housing in an area that cannot support the influx of hundreds of new people.
Thank you
Charles
37914
5-N-26-RZ
Charles (37914), April 15, 2026 at 12:57 PM
Very interested in the future of this property I own the property directly across from this lot and have seen issues with this road ever since I was a kid. This road is very narrow very blind in a lot of road space areas the edges of the road are already deteriorating with the absence of the county care for most of my life. This property never had a for sale sign or any knowledge of sale for any local person to keep this agricultural. It was a horse field since before 1990 that I know of as I am 35 currently. Please send me emails of updates I'm sure that my individual voice no one cares about however I do think the sale was unfair to anyone that may have been interested and I'm also interested in if they move forward how they will get rid of the flooding that occurs across the road from the new Dr.Horton subdivision that is adjacent from this field will it worsen will they be prepared or made by the county fix this issue?
Lynette
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lynette (37920), April 13, 2026 at 8:31 PM
One set of the stairs up the steep North site of the hill facing the river needs to be converted into a long ramp. I'm a fairly active senior but if I lived there and were to cross the Gay street bridge to town and was counting on the elevator to get me back up the hill and I came back to find it not working.....believe me, I have been there and seen it when there is only one elevator....I would be up that proverbial creek without a paddle. A ramp I would be able to handle slowly but surely.
Chris
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Chris (37924), April 13, 2026 at 12:36 PM
Attached is the updated petition, effective 4-13-26 - 885 signatures, 276 comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260413123624.pdf
Alivia
37914
4-B-26-RZ
Alivia (37914), April 12, 2026 at 10:08 AM
I oppose the proposed development of 194 apartment units on farmland in East Tennessee. Once productive farmland is paved over, it is gone for good. Our rural communities depend on preserving open land, protecting local agriculture, managing stormwater naturally, and maintaining the character that makes this area special. A project of this size would also place added strain on already stretched roads, traffic patterns, schools, utilities, and emergency services. Growth should be planned responsibly in areas already suited for higher-density housing, not by sacrificing valuable farmland and rural infrastructure. I urge you to protect our community’s long-term future and vote against this proposal.
Kathleen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kathleen (37920), April 11, 2026 at 11:31 AM
As a home owner and business owner in South Knoxville, I vehemently disagree with the plan to build that complex at Kerbela shrine. They are asking for height and size variances. The South waterfront codes were written precisely to protect South Knoxville. There should be NO EXCEPTIONS TO THESE STANDARD STANDARDS. The corner of Chapman Highway/Henley and Blount Streets already have enough housing. The traffic alone from this complex will turn Chapman Highway into more of a death trap. People exiting their complex at Mimosa Avenue we’ll have to squeeze their way into northbound traffic to go over the Henley Bridge. There is currently a no left turn sign at mimosa and Chapman so there will be no way for residence of this complex to turn left. The southbound traffic coming over the Henley bridge will have to move into the center turn lane and then cross through two lanes of traffic to enter their complex at mimosa Avenue this entrance/egress cannot afford that kind of traffic. The Henley Street bridge is the only north south tributary that we have since the Gay Street bridge is closed.
Paul
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Paul (37920), April 9, 2026 at 10:00 AM
The attached will be used as part of my speaking opportunity for Case # 4-L-26-RZ today.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260409100024.pdf
Michael
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Michael (37924), April 9, 2026 at 6:20 AM
Please call a halt to any new development plans for East Knox county at least until a thorough look at the current infrastructure (roads, schools, water, sewage, quality of life for existing residents, etc.,) is completed and studied by both the commission and the residents. We love our area, most all of us have chosen the east Knox county area for just what it is, forsaking the west side because of what it has become. We don't need high-density apartments or condos. People live here because we have a little room to move, a little quieter life style, and feel your plans are against our values, our needs, and our capability of handling this level of development.
Debbie
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Debbie (37924), April 8, 2026 at 10:53 AM
I have lived in the Carter community all of my life. You used to see beautiful farmland. Now most of the land has gone to the developers. Building house after house and so many apartments. It's getting to where the roads and the stores are so crowded that I hate to even get out. Please vote no on these apartments. It's time to stop the developers.
Nikki
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Nikki (37871), April 8, 2026 at 8:26 AM
I am a concerned mother and member of the Carter community. I went to Carter as a child and 4 of my children go to Carter Elementary and Carter high. I have a friend that lives off of Pleasant Hill Road with her 2 daughters. She is now in fear of her children's safety if this development happens. They bought their little house on a little dead end the road so they could have a bit of peace knowing that their children would be safer playing outside. If this development happens that peace and feeling of safety is gone for everyone in the community. There will no longer be a safe place for any child to ride their little bicycles, walk to school or play basketball. This isn't just about making money here. Your decision is going affect every family mother, father and child in the community.. that little road barely fits two compact cars passing each other. You usually have to pull over to the ditch to let someone by if they're in a truck. This is a dangerous proposition. This is no place for any development. Our schools are packed. Our teachers are overwhelmed. It is not feasible. The only rational decision that can be made on this is voting NO to the proposed development. Our community matters, our children matter. I just hope they matter to you all too.
Linda
37918
4-B-26-RZ
Linda (37918), April 7, 2026 at 8:50 PM
Please just say NO! My family has lived in this area for generations. Please continue to keep this agricultural. Pleasant Hill cannot handle additional traffic safely!
Lori
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Lori (37924), April 7, 2026 at 3:30 PM
I say no to building apts in an area where traffic has already increased and the schools are getting overcrowded which will lead to kids falling behind!! It's bad enough with the increased traffic because of all the new housing going in with no significant road improvements ! The roads haven't been improved as it is and with so much land in other areas where the roads can be improved and have room for new schools why would this small 4 way area even be considered !! Please reconsider building elsewhere! Thank you, Lori F.
Teri
37920
4-A-26-OB
Teri (37920), April 7, 2026 at 8:49 AM
Please do not build any additional housing units at this location. We have so many "student" housing already in place in this vicinity and the traffic on Chapman Hwy -Henley Bridge is horrid. Since the Gay street bridge is only pedestrian-the traffic is a nightmare trying to get into the city or onto I-40. Knoxville is growing-we understand-but there are so many other places that can fit more housing units and it's not at this location. What an eyesore the riverfront has become with dozens of cheaply built, overpriced apartment complexes. When did Knoxville become a College with a city built around it instead of a City with a college? Money hungry out of town businesses are sucking the beauty out of our town.
4-B-26-RZ
Kat (37876), April 7, 2026 at 8:29 AM
We do not need apartments where you are seeking to put them. We need more farmland to continue, if you want to invest maybe try investing in something that truly helps the community.
If you want more apartments, build in Sevier county or closer to them. Maybe even Morristown. They've already sold their souls for folks like you who only see dollar signs.
Heck why not join in with the Buckee development and put your money to better use.
Thank you for offering to buy land to clear and sell to highest bidder but we don't need that type of stuff here.
Bradley
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Bradley (37920), April 6, 2026 at 10:44 PM
I, my family and my neighbors strongly oppose the proposed re-zoning request for 0 Tipton Station. Several have already noted the lack of infrastructure on Sayne Lane to accommodate the proposed housing development. The location on Tipton Station is also problematic as increasing traffic and development is inconsistent with current traffic capacity and safety. Furthermore, the proposed re-zoning is not consistent with the natural topography and land use in this region of South Knoxville. A prior re-zoning request on an adjacent property was denied in the past couple of years, providing local precedence for zoning considerations in our community. We ask that the planning committee continue to serve our local committee by rejecting this request from a developer from outside of South Knoxville. Thank you.
John
37920
4-L-26-RZ
John (37920), April 6, 2026 at 8:35 PM
I simply ask that the commission please give the people living in the local area priority over a few elected officials and inconsiderate builders who are only looking for a quick way to make a buck with no consideration of the people already living in the area who want no part of the many problems (congestion, drainage, air pollution, traffic, security, etc.) extra housing would present for Sayne Lane residents and the adjacent area. Sayne Lane is just that, a lane and not a two-way street. As I understand the owner sold the property with the promise by the buyer that only one house would be built. I have since learned that the proposed plan is to build 22-28 housing units. What happened to the promise?
Thank you for your kind consideration of the neighborhood's request and of the local homeowners. I ask that you please leave the property zoned Agricultural as is. Thank you for a common sense approach!!!!
4-L-26-RZ
joe (37920), April 6, 2026 at 6:34 PM
I do not agree with this. We do NOT have the roads or the infrastructure to more development!
NORMAN
37920
4-L-26-RZ
NORMAN (37920), April 6, 2026 at 5:06 PM
Please deny this request.Sayne Lane is a one lane dead end road with NO TURNAROUND.Anyone wanting to turn around are using private drives and property to do so mine included.The proposed zoning would only make a bad situation worse especially when they start logging that parcel and all the missed turns.My recommendation is DENY DENY DENY.Thank You Norman.
SUZIE
37920
4-L-26-RZ
SUZIE (37920), April 6, 2026 at 4:02 PM
I am opposed to any rezoning until the concerns regarding infrastructure are addressed. We are a rural community. We do not need more Commercial development or Residential Development at this time. And we do not have the resources to support it. We have so much development and proposed development going on at this time we have lost the appeal of the area.
Steven
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Steven (37920), April 6, 2026 at 3:27 PM
Please leave this property as agricultural zoning and put preservation over profit. While it is important to set aside land for development, it needs to be the right land. And there is plenty of more suitable land along John Sevier Highway and Chapman Highway. It is equally important (perhaps more-so with so much growth), to preserve land in Knox County. Once it is gone, it is gone forever. The area bordering and south of Tipton Station is home to a diversity of wildlife. Deer, bear, river otter, beaver, muskrat, great blue heron, bobcats, turkey, ducks, hawks, bald eagle and more. This parcel is home to Trillium, Strawberry Bush, Canada Mayflower, Eastern Woodland Sedge, Cranefly and more. It is my understanding that approving the developer's zoning request and developing this property as they wish will add an estimated 303 vehicle trips per day. Approving that request will add strain to an already overburdened infrastructure and further erode the rural nature of our community.
Gary
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Gary (37920), April 6, 2026 at 3:13 PM
A proposal of 4 dua at this site is completely out of character with the surrounding properties. The site fronts on Tipton Station Road and Sayne Lane. There is only approximately 190' of frontage on Tipton Station Road. Site distance in this area is not adequate and the distance between any proposed entrance and Sayne Lane will create a traffic problem. Sayne Lane is equivalent to a driveway and is not adequate to support any traffic associated with 4 dua. Based upon my development knowledge and knowledge of this site I am COMPLETELY opposed to this request. A density of 2 dua would be more adequate.
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), April 5, 2026 at 9:49 PM
Many cities have hills that are pleasant to look at instead of just apartment buildings. This particular hill in Knoxville deserves to be treated specially because of its location at the end of the Gay Street bridge and visible from downtown. Planning needs to insist on SW-5 and SW-6 zoning rules be complied with and WITHOUT VARIANCES. The slopes can be managed with landscaping which is pleasing. The steps should lead up to a park-light public space, not private property. South Knoxville does not need or want another mammoth apartment building on top of one of the few remaining hills that are on the South side. Please do not allow this private seller or developer to have variances to the form-based code that was so carefully planned by the public.
John
37931
4-B-26-RZ
John (37931), April 5, 2026 at 9:38 AM
This is one of the best ideas to come forward in a long time for this area. The Town Center Mixed Use zoning designation will allow this rezoning to be viable for the forseeable future. Integrated, walkable, open-air projects blending residential, commercial, cultural, and institutional uses to create vibrant community hubs is exactly what this area needs in the addition to much needed housing opportunities. This will also bring much needed consistent tax revenue and employment opportunities to an area that is in desperate need of them.
Tess
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Tess (37924), April 3, 2026 at 9:30 AM
Please resist the urge to approve any further large housing developments in our little northeast Knoxville. Most of us live here because it was quieter and not so busy. With the developments already here, the traffic, noise pollution, homeless, and infrastructure damage has increased massively. Please stop making us city.
Jeremy
37721
4-B-26-RZ
Jeremy (37721), April 2, 2026 at 7:46 PM
My mother in law owns a home not far from here off Thornhrove Pike and I own a home in Corryton inside Knox county. As an engineer, I believe there needs to be a series of traffic impact studies fully funded by this developer before we let them further overcrowd our already stressed roadway system. I think the results would clearly show that the surrounding roadways cannot support the increase in traffic. All over Knoxville congestion is a major problem because our streets were never designed for the population growth we have already seen post Covid. It is foolish to continue to allow dense retail centers with low wage jobs and high density apartment complexes with very high rent to take over this town. Working class people are being priced out of the very place they grew up and its not right! We need more affordable single family housing and regulations to prevent private equity firms from capitalizing on them to the detriment of working class folks! Thank you Adam Thompson for voting NO against this rezoning! Keep this area agricultural for now and let a builder like Worley rezone it for affordable houses like they build in Stonewood Creek!
Franklin
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Franklin (37871), April 2, 2026 at 5:51 PM
I was the ups driver in some form in this area until last year. I live maybe a half a mile from pleasant hill. I grew up riding my bike and walking the creeks here. But it’s to the point I even hate crossing the road to get the mail. Our roads can’t handle apartments. And our roads can not be reworked to handle the amount of people you’re trying to force on us. All my life I’ve looked forward to retiring in my little quiet town. You all are destroying all that’s left of strawberry plains USA. One store two sit down restaurants. Which was fine before. But with so many people now you can’t enjoy a night out or go to the store without people running you over in the lot. I understand the need for housing. I don’t understanding dumping 1000’s of people in a small town. Especially in something they can’t own. How much money is enough to these developers? I know this will fall on death ears if even read. But heck it made me feel better. Stop by sometime we will fish the pond and pick some blackberries. Hurry though. They will be covered in concrete soon!
Melissa
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Melissa (37871), April 2, 2026 at 5:18 PM
No one in our community wants this! We need better infrastructure before we can add this much to our population. Our roads and schools are not ready for this - affordable housing, yes! Apartments - no!
Jessi
37764
4-B-26-RZ
Jessi (37764), April 2, 2026 at 5:02 PM
My neighbors and I appreciate land zoned for agriculture as it helps keep our population less dense, our farming community thriving, and our surroundings more enjoyable. Currently, our schools are at max capacity for optimal learning and safety. Our roads also need many repairs before handling more traffic. We are already underserved in essential resources such as grocery stores, healthcare access, and emergency services. Allowing 194 more apartments to be built in this school zone in addition to the other multi-dwelling housing already approved recently (ie- Universal at Strawberry Plains Apartments, Village at Strawberry Hills, and Strawberry Meadows Townhomes) is negligent, not only for the reasons mentioned above, but also for children’s safety. Pleasant Hill is not eligible for a bus route, nor does it have a sidewalk. Increased apartments would result in increased kids walking on the narrow, winding roads home with increased traffic. It is both my and your responsibility to protect the Carter Community. In doing so we protect the legacy of those before us and safeguard the future of our children. Growth without proper planning is not progress, it’s a problem that causes more problems. The Carter Community would greatly appreciate you voting “NO” to rezoning Pleasant Hill so it can continue to live up to its name as a pleasant place for those who have been living there for generations.
Staci
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Staci (37924), April 2, 2026 at 2:49 PM
Not only does our community whole heartedly oppose the rezoning of this property, it would be detrimental to our everyday way of life. I’ve grown up in the Carter community my entire life, and the last 10 years I’ve spent growing my family on Pleasant Hill. Our community has already grown exponentially with several subdivisions popping up between us and the interstate, growth isn’t a problem here… we don’t need this!
David
37871
4-B-26-RZ
David (37871), April 2, 2026 at 11:24 AM
Please vote no on this. Traffic is already worse due to the recent housing developments not to mention the ones being constructed currently. Schools are overflowing. We live out in rural East Knoxville for reason and developments like this will change our way of life.

PLEASE VOTE NO.
Harold
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Harold (37871), April 1, 2026 at 7:11 PM
After all those living spaces become available traffic will lead to wrecks,deaths, and more tax payers money to install more traffic lights. The schools will be way over crowded for the next decade. People moving from these big city's working from home or trading stocks will drive the prices of everything up. The locals that have been here for multiple generations the family's that settled here and have been here since will be run out!! All the small town Carter community vibe will be nonexistent!! I grew up in Sevier County and watched it happen I don't want to see another small town/community disappear because a few people want to get more rich
Ethan
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Ethan (37924), April 1, 2026 at 5:02 PM
I've lived in East Knoxville/Strawberry Plains long enough to see what makes this place special and what's slipping away. This isn't just land on a map. It's the rhythm of rural life, the open spaces, the small roads, the culture that has shaped generations. Adding 194 units here isn't growth, it's overcrowding. It risks turning our quiet community into just another subdivision, erasing what makes it home. Please consider that not every inch of land should be built on, and not every community should lose its soul to development.
Daniel
37914
4-B-26-RZ
Daniel (37914), April 1, 2026 at 4:30 PM
I oppose this rezoning of this property. High density housing does not belong at this location. This isn't an urban environment nor should be. I'm not confident that there is an adequate plan for the impact on the schools in the Carter community, and I am definitely not confident that increased traffic has been adequately considered from this property all the way to the interstate. I am certain the the sum of population being added in east knoxville is not adequately studied/surveyed. While individual traffic studies are happening, where is the cumulative report on all the residential developments happening off Asheville Highway, John Sevier, and Strawberry Plains Pike?
4-B-26-RZ
Tom (37924), April 1, 2026 at 12:17 PM
The application under consideration is inconsistent with the surrounding residential neighborhood, which relatively speaking, is low density. Twelve housing units per acre in a community of low density, single-family dwellings, is exceedingly far more than would be compatible and consistent.

In addition, neither Pleasant Hill Road nor Kitts Road, as they currently exist, are able to safely manage vehicular and pedestrian traffic, especially in consideration of this location being in a Parental Responsibility Zone for public schools.

Comparing this proposed residential development with nearby developments, namely Brakebill Road, in which no obvious road improvements have been made, despite many new residential units either already constructed or under construction, makes me wonder whether there’s a plan for safely handling the anticipated traffic volume which is obviously bound to increase substantially.
Cathy
37806
4-B-26-RZ
Cathy (37806), April 1, 2026 at 11:09 AM
I am very concerned about the amount of traffic that the proposed housing would cause, there are students walking this road since it is in the PR zone. Many residents walk their dogs and children play near the street. There are no sidewalks on Pleasant Hill Rd and in fact it doesn't even have a shoulder for pedestrians to walk on. The influx of more students would put a strain on the schools which are already full. We would not be opposed to single family dwellings, Pleasant Hill Road and Kitts road are not able to handle the extra traffic a multi family housing project would add. We would like to see some commercial businesses in the area but not in the location proposed. Please use wise development
Kelly
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Kelly (37924), April 1, 2026 at 10:49 AM
Please see attached pdf
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260401104947.pdf
Charlotte
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Charlotte (37871), April 1, 2026 at 9:28 AM
almighty dollar. Be a person who wants to save the agricultural areas so children of today and tomorrows know that such things exist not just housing on top of housing and pavement. Remember your childhood in days of being outside. VOTE NO on this PLEASE
Marian
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Marian (37924), March 31, 2026 at 8:19 PM
I STRONGLY OPPOSE the rezoning of the property at 8934 Pleasant Hill Road (4-B-26-RZ) for numerous reasons but mainly:
-safety for the children that walk or bicycle to & from school
-increased traffic on this NARROW road which doesn't have the capacity to handle
-lack of commercial/retail businesses that are needed NOW to support the recent housing 'boom' within minutes of this area
-decrease in the value of all existing single family homes surrounding this property
-loss of integrity & history of a long-standing rural community
This area CANNOT support the proposed development of 194 'units' or any other proposed density of this magnitude!
I ask ALL members of the Planning Commission to say 'NO' to this rezoning because IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO!
Gayla
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Gayla (37920), March 31, 2026 at 2:36 PM
Please see my attached comments regarding 0 Tipton Station, Knox County, TN.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260331143601.pdf
Ashton
37914
4-B-26-RZ
Ashton (37914), March 31, 2026 at 2:01 PM
As a life long resident of the Carter community and as a parent of two kids that attend Carter and plan to stay in the area after they graduate. Four Way is a community center, but I think that our community center definition and the current administration definition are not the same.
Community to us does not come from the outside but from within. We already have a community adding a "multi family unit" to an area that has no infrastructure to support it, does not benefit our community, it hinders it.
 
The Carter area has at least 7 new or ongoing projects that I know about. Three of those being "multi family units" and the others being single family homes in tightly compressed subdivisions. We don't know what effect these new developments will have yet. But all these developments feed into the Carter schools. Schools that are already struggling to keep up with demand. As a parent I want to know that my taxes are going to benefit my children and all the children that come through after them.
 
For these reasons please vote NO on rezoning this property.
Kevin
37918
4-B-26-RZ
Kevin (37918), March 31, 2026 at 1:24 PM
Looking at the area context, this is an undeveloped parcel that's in an area with a lot of under-developed brownfield property. Instead of doing greenfield development here, I think the area and town center vision would benefit from some brownfield redevelopment instead of taking existing agricultural parcel - which provides connection to the rural character surrounding - and developing that.
Merle
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Merle (37924), March 31, 2026 at 12:19 PM
I am saying NO to the rezoning of property between Kitts & Pleasant Hill roads. The infrastructure in this area cannot support the possibility of 194 single/ multi-family units. The proposed site is isolated from businesses that are already struggling to meet the local community needs due to lack of them. Plus, the fact this would be sitting amongst single family homes that would cause many concerns and safety as well. Concerns such as current homes property values, policing, the amount of traffic this would create on such narrow and already outdated roads, and the fact that our youth use the roads to walk to school, skateboard and ride bikes due to location of Carter schools.

This property also has a natural spring that would be impacted from the change not only contamination but possibly creating water issues for properties that are located lower than the proposed site.

This was zoned agricultural and must remain that or zoned in as single family homes with a limitation of homes per acre. Preferably no more than 2 per acre which would be acceptable for most of us.
4-B-26-RZ
Jan (37914), March 31, 2026 at 11:11 AM
Please don't put apartments in that location. Single family houses might be OK, but the roads would still have to be improved. And not like the "improvements" made on Brakebill, which consisted of a turning lane at the development entrance. That narrow, crumbling road is not safe when meeting dualies, vehicles pulling lawn mower trailers, dump trucks, delivery trucks and other box trucks that travel across it throughout the day. We were misled by the developers. The infrastructure in our area can’t handle the developments being imposed on us.
Paul
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Paul (37920), March 31, 2026 at 10:36 AM
I am against the rezoning for appearance and safety reasons. The attached PDF has explanation and pictures.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260331103605.pdf
Kevin
37918
4-B-26-RZ
Kevin (37918), March 31, 2026 at 8:23 AM
Dear commissioners - the proposed rezoning is near an area that has for a long time been identified as potential town center area - the Four Way In area at the heart of the Carter Community. This was identified back in 2001 in the East County Sector Plan.

The 2011 East County Sector Plan identified an area for E Co-3. Importantly, it recommended a program to work with area stakeholders to consider the town center concept, including a “vision plan” to establish the land use relationships, future road and bicycle/pedestrian network and connections to schools and parks.

The same action plan was recommended in the 2017 East County Community Plan.

A vision plan has never been put together for this area. This community engagement is a critical step, but has been neglected. Now this rezoning request is before you, and because there has been no vision plan put together, the community is not onboard. You have no design standards from a vision plan that could guide a development plan application under the PR zone. I urge you to defer this request until you can do a vision plan.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260331082313.pdf
Brian
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Brian (37920), March 31, 2026 at 1:12 AM
Please the attached PDF for comments I would like to share related to the rezoning request for 0 Tipton Station. Thank you.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260331011248.pdf
Chris
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Chris (37924), March 30, 2026 at 11:26 PM
During a community meeting, the developer noted that the Planning Commission has recommended a high-density plan for this site. However, our infrastructure is not equipped to support the proposed 194 apartments. The property lies within a PRZ, and there are no sidewalks to safely accommodate students. Traffic congestion during drop-off and pickup at Carter Elementary would become unmanageable.

Additionally, Pleasant Hill Road northbound requires crossing two lanes of Andrew Johnson Highway, posing a significant safety concern. Traffic heading toward Strawberry Plains Pike would also face limited visibility due to a blind hill in both directions. Compounding these issues, the property contains a natural spring, and its development would likely result in severe environmental harm.

Taken together, the negative impacts of this proposed development far outweigh any potential benefits. I respectfully request a thorough review of the community impact. Please find attached a petition and comments from residents opposing this development. Attached are 549 people who signed the petition and 153 comments showing the community is not in favor of these developments. I ask that you consider the community's concerns regarding high-density zoning for the selected property. Thank you for your consideration. The petition and comments will be updated on April 2 as the Planning Board provides its recommendation on this property before the meeting on April 9.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260330232604.pdf
Beverly
ll 37
4-B-26-RZ
Beverly (ll 37), March 30, 2026 at 8:12 PM
I am totally against this! Please don’t allow this in our community. Thank you
Joey
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Joey (37924), March 30, 2026 at 9:02 AM
I have lived in this community my entire 52 years. This development will directly affect my property. I live on Pleasant Hill Rd and Lyons Creek runs through my back yard. When we get a lot of rain it has came up in my yard. The runoff from the roads and storm drains will run into the creek producing much more and quicker runoff, which will potentially flood properties.

Also this development is in the (PRZ) parental responsibility zone, so the busses do not stop. So all of the kids going to school if not being driven by a parent will have to walk. This road is small and that will be very dangerous.

The extra traffic will be too much for the road. Pleasant Hill is already a very busy road, with dangerous pullouts and both stop signs.
The end at Strawberry Plains pike is a blind hill. The Andrew Johnson end is at an angle onto a divided four lane, with Kitts Rd also coming into it just before a gas station. The intersection is already bad.

I am good with growth but wise growth and until the roads and infrastructure is taken care of first this is too much for the community and Pleasant Hill Rd.
Kelly
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Kelly (37924), March 30, 2026 at 8:47 AM
The 194 apartments that are planned to be built on Pleasant Hill Road would be detrimental to our neighborhood and community. Not sure if you are aware but we are in the PRZ (parental responsibility zone) therefore the buses do not run in the mornings, so a lot of children walk or ride bikes to school. More traffic through here would be dangerous these children plus it would increase the number of children walking or riding bikes to school. We also have a lot of elderly that walk their dogs daily and again more traffic would be extremely dangerous to them as well. Pleasant Hill Road is too narrow to support more traffic and the safety of our children and elderly is crucial. You must be aware that Carter Elementary is already at maximum capacity, and the pickup line is already a lengthy ordeal. Last but not least is the natural spring that runs through the proposed property, it will be compromised and can cause flooding to the existing homes. The wildlife that we all enjoy will be eradicated from this area. This proposed development will be a huge travesty to neighborhood and community. With only one large grocery store and three sit down restaurants we cannot support that volume of people here in the Strawberry Plains / East Knox community. Please choose to use wise development, we are begging you not to take away the peaceful little community we have and ruin it with overdevelopment.
Rhonda
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Rhonda (37871), March 29, 2026 at 5:07 PM
I am highly opposed to this rezoning. Pleasant Hill Road already has too many children dangerously playing in the road. They walk to school and the cannot access a sidewalk without being in a busy road for several blocks. Additionally, there is not enough retail and commercial access available to satisfy the existing population. Before we have significant population growth we need more grocery stores, restaurants and gas stations. We need to follow a planned growth path and not this type of development.
Kathy
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Kathy (37924), March 29, 2026 at 2:44 PM
We have heard over and over that new zoning was needed to protect farmland and preserve the beauty of this area. Yet before the process is even complete, developers are already trying to change it. Why implement a land use map if it can simply be altered whenever a developer wants something different?

This proposal appears to be driven by profit, not by what is best for the community. The area around the Four Way Inn along Asheville Highway has long been considered a Special Town Zone for a reason. That designation was meant to protect the character of the area, not open it up to this type of development.

This area should remain protected as a Special Town Zone. Changing it would not only alter the neighborhood but also place additional strain on roads and schools. There was a reason this designation existed in the first place.

Developers have many places they can build. Why choose the center of a community that was specifically set aside for something else? This decision should reflect long-term community interests, not short-term profit. Do not sell us out.
Steve
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Steve (37924), March 28, 2026 at 6:54 PM
Please stop all rezoning of 8934 Pleasant Hill Rd and the rest of East Knox county.
There is no infrastructure to support more people.
Current new housing is already and overload.
Side roads are too small and full of potholes.
North Pleasant Hill road and Molly bright hasn't been paved in over 35 years. Two trucks can't pass on it.
Highways are too crowded.
Not enough grocery stores.
Dump stays full supporting Knox, Jefferson, Grainger and Sevier counties. I see out of county tags every visit.
No gas.
No Sewer.
No water in places.
Martha
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Martha (37920), March 27, 2026 at 8:41 PM
I own property that is near this proposed rezoning. I am asking you to please consider the lack of road infrastructure, over populated school system before you make this decision.
 
This is an area I grew up in and know very well. It is very much family oriented.
 
We would Love to see more shopping and family restaurants come in further down Chapman Highway. Utilizing buildings or empty lots that stand vacant.
Galen
83616
4-F-26-DP
Galen (83616), March 27, 2026 at 4:15 PM
Good day, I support the decision to develop town homes at 1155 & 1161 Copperwood Lane. I own the adjacent property at 1162 Copperwood Lane which has existing town homes. The lots being considered for development have been an eye sore and a haven for illegal trash dumping. I am pleased to see that these lots are being cleaned up and planned for development. Thank you
Carolyn
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Carolyn (37871), March 27, 2026 at 9:46 AM
While East Knoxville realizes this community needs to grow with more restaurants and retail, it doesn't need to grow with adding 194 apartments on a very small road (pleasant Hill rd.) that is already a very busy road. There are kids that play in the road riding their bikes, walking their dogs and to walking to school. The buses do NOT pick up kids in this area due to being so close to the schools. Driving from Pleasant Hill Road to strawberry plains pike there is a very bad blind spot for drivers and the kids walking to school. I travel this road a lot visiting my brother and his family that lives at the corner of Pleasant Hill and Zesta Ln, this is a very busy road already. This is also an aging community, so you have senior citizens walking their dogs and driving this road very day has well. Adding more traffic will make it even more dangerous for the kids and seniors Also, something else to consider is the water run-off from the parking lots of the apartments that will be potentially built. You know there will be oil, gas, dirt etc. running off during rain and that will end up in the creek that runs through that community.

The East Knox Community appreciates your consideration in denying this rezoning request.
Sarah
37914
4-B-26-RZ
Sarah (37914), March 26, 2026 at 11:22 PM
I wholly disagree with the planning commission rezoning this land for more housing development. We love our small town feel and do not have currently, nor have the capacity to accommodate more people and the infrastructure that is required. Please do not rezoning this property
Sarah
37721
4-B-26-RZ
Sarah (37721), March 26, 2026 at 9:40 AM
I respectfully request that the zoning hold remain in place. Our community deserves the same level of thoughtful planning and long-range consideration that areas like West Knoxville by pausing large developments for the community to sustain long term growth . Rushing this process risks creating long-term issues that could be avoided with proper evaluation, infrastructure planning, and genuine community input.

We are simply asking for patience and the chance to ensure that growth is done responsibly, sustainably, and in a way that protects the character and safety of our area. Waiting now will prevent bigger problems later.

Thank you for your attention and commitment to making decisions that support the best interests of our community.
Jennifer
37914
4-B-26-RZ
Jennifer (37914), March 26, 2026 at 7:47 AM
Please stop building residential areas in East Knox County! We do not have the infrastructure for this! Our roads are not wide enough, there is too much traffic and we do not have enough grocery stores! Food City is NOT enough for the influx of people. Our wild life is suffering as well as they are losing their homes. Once they are gone, we will never get them back. Please!
KRISTYN
37924
4-B-26-RZ
KRISTYN (37924), March 25, 2026 at 2:04 PM
The proposed rezoning of 12 acres for 194 apartments would create serious safety, traffic, and infrastructure problems for the Pleasant Hill Road community. Kitts Road and Pleasant Hill Road would be the only two access points, neither of which can handle increased traffic or be widened. Nearby roads, including Strawberry Plains Pike, Andrew Jackson Highway, and I-40 exits, are already congested and dangerous. Increased traffic would threaten pedestrian safety for families and children who walk to local schools and community facilities. Area schools - Carter Elementary, Middle, and High - are already at capacity and unlikely to expand. The project would negatively impact home values, overwhelm infrastructure, and create hazardous conditions while prioritizing developer profit over community well-being.
Chris
37924
4-B-26-RZ
Chris (37924), March 24, 2026 at 3:19 PM
This rezoning, with the potential for 194 apartments, is unacceptable for this 12-acre property at 8934 Pleasant Hill Road. The school system has reached its capacity limits as enforced by the Tennessee Fire Marshal, and approving this and other developments only causes a safety issue for the impacted schools. I am researching the capacity limits set by the Fire Marshal and the total number of students and staff for each Knox County School. In my opinion, this will be a major factor given the recent approvals of the developments by the Zoning Board and County Commission. As the county continues to support development, safety issues will continue to mount. We must stop and review the developments moving forward. From schools, roads, and the disruption of the way of life are being affected, and citizens of East Knoxville is very upset - rightly so - of the continued development without support to manage the growth.
Jennifer
37871
4-B-26-RZ
Jennifer (37871), March 24, 2026 at 10:38 AM
Our area is already to congested. The schools are full. Our roads already can't handle the traffic is it currently has. Repairs are poor if even done to the roads now. Stop the over crowding of this area. This will only lead to more crime and accidents. Loss of wildlife because we keep destroying their homes then killing then as they get to close to us. This entire area needs an upgrade before even thinking about adding more traffic and population. We live here. We travel these roads daily and it's only getting worse.
Jerlissa
37890
4-B-26-RZ
Jerlissa (37890), March 24, 2026 at 9:43 AM
Save our farms
4-B-26-RZ
Ann (37914), March 23, 2026 at 3:53 PM
I live, worship, & have grandchildren in the schools. Our roads & schools can't support all these new developments that have already been approved much less more. Please stop this development from coming.
Lorraine
37721
4-B-26-RZ
Lorraine (37721), March 23, 2026 at 3:37 PM
The infrastructure will not support 194 dwellings. Pleasant Hill Rd is not wide enough to accommodate the amount of traffic this would create plus since is so close to Carter HS this road is used for kids walking to school.
Jason
37920
4-L-26-RZ
Jason (37920), March 19, 2026 at 8:17 PM
We met a few years ago to discuss how the members of the Sayne Lane community do not want any more rezoning to increase population density. This was already granted to a close property that was rezoned. Against the request of the community, Knox county granted an increase of density for that large tract making it into a large subdivision. This is enough. Based on that request, that should satisfy Knox County's desire for population increase. Clearly this is only to benefit the construction company to make more money with added freedom to sell more residences out side of the originally designed zone restrictions that the citizens of the communities found acceptable. STOP SELLING US OUT!