4-B-26-SU cindy (37914), April 9, 2026 at 10:31 AM
The noise and disturbance this church already creates is bad enough. I am opposed to the expansion. Plus there are 5 other churches within walking distance of this one.
Please consider the wildlife and watershed in the heavily wooded are of this property. From my backyard I see and enjoy many deer, turkey, groundhogs, squirrels and bird life. There are many culverts that empty to this land to prevent flooding in the Garfield Estates subdivision. A tributary is located in the lowest part of the property to mitigate large amounts of water shed during heavy rain storms.
Please consider proper planning before adding additional houses for Carter Mill Dr. Currently, there are at least a thousand cars a day passing on a road that is made for 1.5 cars. My vehicle was totaled on this road last week, and I have had several "close" incidents of getting hit head-on. Carter Mill Rd doesn't even have lines. This is a huge safety issue and must be addressed before adding additional housing.
8-D-26-PA Janet (37938), August 3, 2026 at 11:26 PM
I would like to know if there are plans to preserve the integrity of the property around the historic Gray bell spring. The immediate area around the spring is overgrown, but there are remnants of stone substructure around the part of the spring that is closest to McCloud Road. The spring appears to seep up to the surface at several areas on the west end of this property.
8-H-26-RZ Daniella (37938), August 4, 2026 at 10:18 AM
I have serious concerns about the impact this proposed development would have on existing residents and infrastructure in our community. Many of the roads in this area are already extremely narrow, some to the point that it can be difficult for two vehicles to safely pass one another. Traffic during normal school and work commute times is already becoming a significant source of frustration for residents. Adding a substantial number of additional homes and vehicles raises an important question: are our existing roads, schools, and emergency services actually equipped to accommodate this level of additional growth? Growth should not be evaluated solely on whether additional development can physically fit within an area. The impact on the people who already live here should matter as well. Additional congestion and added minutes to residents' daily commutes are not beneficial to their quality of life, particularly when the infrastructure serving the area is already strained. Before approving additional development, I believe there should be a clear and realistic assessment of roadway capacity and safety, school capacity, emergency response capabilities, and the cumulative traffic impact of developments that have already been approved or constructed, not simply the impact of this project considered in isolation.
8-H-26-RZ Alex (37938), August 4, 2026 at 11:17 AM
I am opposed to rezoning application 8-H-26-RZ. I live off Hill Road, and it is already difficult to safely leave my neighborhood because of the traffic on Fort Sumter Road. Adding approximately 50 new homes would bring well over 100 additional vehicles, plus school buses, delivery trucks, and visitors, to roads that are already struggling to handle current traffic. I am also concerned about increased stormwater runoff and erosion. Developing this property could increase runoff and create drainage issues that may affect nearby homes and properties. Finally, this area has always been a rural community. Many of us chose to live here because of its open space and low-density character. This development would permanently change the feel of our community and set a precedent for more high-density growth in the future. I respectfully ask the Planning Commission to deny this rezoning request and preserve the safety, infrastructure, and rural character of our community.
8-H-26-RZ Laura (37938), August 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Please no more subdivision near McCloud. The road is like a main highway anymore and we have to pull out of driveways and pray for our life as people fly down this road like it is a drag strip. Also we have wildlife that lost ma y homes when the fruit and berry patch was sold so where else will these other animals go as we are taking all the land from them and they have no place to go!!! Someone needs to just sit in Halls on Friday evening and see all the traffic madness. We are full and have no room at the schools either!!!. You all just look at the money and not what is best for the community. Please don't add more subdivision to our community.
8-H-26-RZ Blair (37938), August 5, 2026 at 11:11 PM
I am opposed to the development of this property. I believe three homes per acre is incompatible with the surrounding community and exceeds what the existing roads, schools, drainage, and infrastructure can reasonably support. I would like to see reports/actions on the following: Transportation impact Stormwater management Utility, water and sewer capacity Mccloud rd and Fort Sumter infrastructure - needs to be widened Halls schools current capacity versus potential enrollment Potential cumulative impact from recently approved development on Maynardville hwy
8-H-26-RZ Amanda (37938), August 6, 2026 at 6:05 AM
I am not opposed to growth or development in Halls. I understand our community will continue to grow. My concern is whether this particular proposal is the right density for this location and whether our existing infrastructure can support it. This proposal would place 51 homes on approximately 17 acres -about three homes per acre. I ask the Planning Commission to carefully consider not only the impact of this development alone, but also the cumulative impact of other recently approved developments in the Halls area. Specifically, I ask that you consider: * The current and projected capacity of Halls schools, as these developments are built out. * The traffic impact on McCloud Road, Fort Sumter, and Maynardville Highway, where residents already experience significant congestion during school drop-off, dismissal, and peak commuting hours. * Whether the existing road network can safely and efficiently handle the additional daily traffic generated by 51 new homes. * Whether improvements to roads and infrastructure should be in place before approving additional high-density residential development. Growth should be planned responsibly. I believe this proposal is simply too dense for the existing roads, schools, and infrastructure serving this area. I respectfully ask the Commission to deny this rezoning request as proposed or require a lower-density development that better fits the capacity of our community. Thank you for your time and your consideration.
8-H-26-RZ Stephanie (37938), August 6, 2026 at 2:46 PM
As someone who works with the school system and also who lives on Fort Sumter. I would ask that you reconsider. We cannot continue to add houses and traffic to our infrastructure. Halls is losing its small community feel. We moved here for the community
8-H-26-RZ Misty (37938), August 6, 2026 at 9:28 PM
We do not need another subdivision in Halls. Our roads cannot handle more traffic. Our roads are in poor condition and already are at max capacity. Our schools are at max capacity. It takes 30 minutes going Emory road at 4:00pm on a Thursday to get to the interstate, and going through halls to 640 is just as bad. Until there is a solution to our infrastructure and schools VOTE NO. We have had a huge subdivisions on Pedigo Rd, on Emory, and on McCloud in the past 3 years with 3 homes per acre. It's too many developments. Property tax have went up, the amount of homes being collected on have enlarged, but yet the money is not being used to make our roads and schools match the influx of people that will be using them.
8-SB-26-C Tiffany (37924), August 7, 2026 at 10:57 AM
We truly do not need 121 more homes in this area. They are already building homes at the other end of Carter Mill near the pool and now this is planned. New and old homes are barely selling right now as it is, there is no need for more. Widening Carter Mill Road to the west to the McCubbins Road intersection needs to happen now and even more if this plan is fully approved. Also needed in this area is a right turn lane at the I-40W ramp off Strawberry Plains. More homes in the area means more traffic. I've almost been hit multiple time with people passing on the shoulder to get onto the highway. There is clearly enough shoulder area available to put in a right turn lane.
8-H-26-RZ Kimberly (37938), August 8, 2026 at 10:37 AM
Good morning I am currently a resident in the overlook Estates subdivision that's off of McLeod Road that goes to the area you are talking about. I am against this because when you build up there on the hill, the runoff will be bad to McLeod Road, which is already bad enough as it is and it will cause McLeod Road to collapse it'll cost flooding and we do not need that in this area. We have enough homes out here as it is already. I also am against it for wildlife purposes we do have a lot of wildlife out here and we'd like to keep it the way it is dear lots of things that come out groundhogs everything we just like to keep it the way it is and I'm totally against this. Lastly, I would say it would bring more traffic in here and the traffic is bad enough and the schools are cramped and full as it is, we don't need more housing in the area..
8-B-26-DP Michael (37924), August 10, 2026 at 7:27 AM
Wooddale Church Road is a narrow, hilly, winding road. It was never meant to handle the amount of traffic that it does now, let alone more. I have lived here for 30 years now and in the first 25 years never had a close call or really any big need to complain about the traffic - other than speeders. Our driveway is just over a hill. Several times now I have almost been hit by other cars coming over the hill while I slowed or had to stop for traffic before entering my driveway. Many times I have had to almost hit the ditches when an approaching truck was on or over the center line - it needs to be widened. What it really needs though is No More Traffic. We moved out here for the rural-ness, the quiet, the "close to Knoxville but in the country" feel and vibe of the area. You are ruining another piece of what makes the county wonderful.
McCubbins Rd is to narrow for all of that traffic, and Wooddale church Rd is also to narrow for that traffic and Carter Mill Rd is to narrow for all that Traffic. We do not Want or Need all of those houses up here in this end of the County so go somewhere else. We like being in the County and don't need all of these city people in our area. So Please don't keep Building in this Area. We are country people and want to stay that way. Thank You
8-B-26-DP Elizabeth (37924), August 10, 2026 at 8:46 AM
We have wayy to many developements going on in the stars every plains pike area we DONT NOT WANT ANYMORE! Traffic is already horrible not to mention off Wooddale Mc Cummins and the Carter Ridge/Carter pool area. The roads are not big enough to fit. The people you guys are trying to put in here. We don't want any more people we have plenty with the state cutting teachers pay school pay. We don't have enough teachers to accommodate the children that we have now but yet you're wanting to add so many more homes to teachers who already don't get paid enough and they continue to cut their pay and continue to cut the positions, but yet y'all are wanting to put more children on loads of teachers, who are barely surviving as is.. take this new development elsewhere we can't affford anymore places here!
8-B-26-DP Melissa (37924), August 10, 2026 at 8:48 AM
We moved to the county because it wasn't a crowded and we could farm. If we wanted to live ontop of each other, we would move downtown with Kincannon but we don't align with her values let a lone the garbage that comes with it. You all know the infrastructure will not hold the amount of homes you want to put out in Carter community. All of our roads are so small you can't even paint a true 2 lane road and all the neighboring streets will be affected as well. The school's can't even handle the amount of kids they have now, and they are already graduating without knowing basic math and can barely read. East Knox isn't the city. Stop trying to turn it into part of the the scruffy city. Us country folk have had all of it we want. Stop letting DR Horton and smith built, buliding horrible homes, stop cramming houses ontop of each other. Leave the east side alone before you destroy it like you have the city. We don't want water problems, we don't want flooding because you will absolutely approve homes in flooding zones and it will ripple over onto neighboring neighborhoods. The new transplants are already flying down our 20mph road and it is only going to get worse. I don't even let my kids wait for the school bus because the road is so dangerous now and adding close to 200 homes will be detrimental to our community.
8-B-26-DP Linda (37924), August 10, 2026 at 10:00 AM
The infrastructure (roads) in this area are not sufficient to handle the additional traffic this would create. Not just Carter Mill Road, but also the other roads to reach Carter Mill Road. Please vote no to this development. Thanks
8-B-26-DP Tanya (37924), August 10, 2026 at 10:33 AM
Carter Mill Road, McCubbins Road, and Wooddale Church Road cannot handle the additional traffic from 120 more properties being placed on Carter Mill Road. This would add over 240+ more vehicles to roads that are already overcrowded even if you say at least 2 vehicles per house but most likely more. With the new condo neighborhood already being added at the end of Wooddale Church Road there is going to be so much congestion trying to even get out on Strawberry Plains Pike. We do not have the infrastructure for the continued growth in our area. Everyday the interstate is now backed up at Strawberry Plains Pike and Asheville Highway. We don't want to be part of the city! Enough is enough!
8-B-26-DP Jennifer (37871), August 10, 2026 at 10:36 AM
This development is extremely detrimental to our livelihood. Please do not approve anymore development in this area! Many of us have well water that is being affected. The roads, schools, the one main grocery store, amongst other community amenities cannot support the influx of structures and/or people in this area. Furthermore, the wildlife in this area have little space left and many are important to our ecosystem. Lastly, this area is already suffering from heavy pollution from the adjacent I-40. I encourage you to deny the developers request and not give in to greed! Thanks for your time and attention.
8-B-26-DP Belinda (37871), August 10, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Please deny this! Our roads are to narrow for extra traffic. The traffic we have now is ridiculous, you can barely get out of your own driveway without being hit by a car that is coming over to pass a car. We don't need anymore people in our area.
8-B-26-DP Dian (37871), August 10, 2026 at 1:52 PM
Please follow staff recommendation and deny this concept plan and development plan due to inadequate road width. As the transportation analysis says, Carter Mill Drive is too narrow to accept this amount of houses. But what the transportation analysis fails to mention is that the roads that Carter Mill Drive leads to - Wooddale Church Road and McCubbins Road - are also far too narrow. Even if Carter Mill Road is widened, these roads would need to be widened too.
8-B-26-DP Todd (37924), August 10, 2026 at 4:51 PM
Please deny 8-B-26-DP in Carter Mill . Carter Mill road cannot handle any more traffic due to it being too narrow for traffic. It is extremely dangerous for two vehicles to pass yet alone construction vehicles. Also, McCubbins road pose the same traffic safety issue. Woodall Church road is nearly impossible to get out at Strawberry Plains Pike during evening hours and i'm afraid there will be bad accidents there in the near future . My family and friends travels this route often and it's getting very dangerous due to the influx of homes you have already passed for development. Any logical traffic study or camera will back up my claim. I am tired of constantly seeing more land up to build with 5 homes per acre without ANY plans to fix the infrastructure around it. We here in Carter demand that proper infrastructure and traffic management be implemented before giving any developer a Green light. We will not have this area ruined by irresponsible building and irresponsible commissioners .period. ! This also means changing rural conservation land to residential. Enough is enough ! If you really want to see a community turnout plan the meetings for the working families to attend i'll guarantee you will be turning people away due to fire code reasons. Do the right thing and say no.
8-SB-26-C Scott (37871), August 11, 2026 at 5:45 PM
As a resident of this community, I ask you to take your staff's recommendation and deny these plans. As the traffic analysis states, Carter Mill Road is too narrow. Further, Wooddale Church Road is too narrow and all the traffic on Carter Mill Road will end up on it.
8-B-26-DP Kathy (37924), August 11, 2026 at 8:36 PM
Please deny this rezoning because the infrastructure is stressed to the limits in this area. The traffic is terrible and there are over 1200 new rooftops here already. We do not need any more houses.
8-H-26-RZ Stephanie (37938), August 12, 2026 at 11:21 AM
I really think you all need to consider that section of road/ highway is already maxed out with the amount travelers during all period of the day. Adding 2 major housing developments that close together would make an already dangerous section of road that much worse.
8-SB-26-C Gary (37924), August 12, 2026 at 1:08 PM
Please stop with all of this continued building and development. The people who are from here and actually live here are tired of seeing our community change so rapidly. I don't understand why we constantly have to battle these committees just to have our voices heard. Everyone knows this isn't really about affordable housing. it's about increasing profits and property values. The reality is that many of these new homes are becoming unaffordable for the people who have lived and worked here for years, while those coming from out of state are the ones who can afford them. We need to start listening to the people who actually call this place home and protect the community we've built.
8-H-26-RZ Samantha (37938), August 12, 2026 at 1:19 PM
These developments are getting out of control! Stop building on every piece of open land! We are overrun with people and cookie-cutter houses by SmithBuilt, DR Horton, and other contractors. Our schools are at capacity. Our busses are overloaded. We're having to put up new traffic lights just to try and keep up. Enough is enough! Leave our little piece of Heaven in North Knox Co ALONE.
8-SB-26-C Carol (37871), August 12, 2026 at 3:11 PM
My husband and I drove down Carter Mill Road two weeks ago and a standard at the number of housing units that had gone in. The Carter schools have to be crowded. Traffic in the mornings for school has to be overwhelming. We drove on out to McCubbins Road and my feeling was to stop more development on Carter Mill. East Knox County roads are not wide enough for all the traffic that is being placed on them. I would say no to Carter Valley or part nine of Carter Mill. Carol B.
8-SB-26-C Erika (37924), August 12, 2026 at 7:32 PM
The road y'all are trying to build all these homes on is a one lane road, so for safety reasons please do reconsider building anything more out here. All you money hungry developers can go to another state and do this, we're full and broke so please I beg of you STOP.
8-C-26-PA Ryan (37938), August 12, 2026 at 11:37 PM
I am not confident that this is the best decision surrounding the development of this part of the neighborhood. While my residence here has only been a few years in this area. Historically, the neighborhood itself has maintained a reputation of being quiet, distinct, and rich with seclusion from the more rural areas. A development like this would greatly impose on the existing peace, and quiet that currently exists here. While I am all for the further development and expansion of the Halls area. I, for one, don't believe that this is the right move for this location. If it was a development for a single family home, or even two, I'd be exited to add to our quiet community. However, being that this plan would suggest the introduction of multi-family housing. You won't have my vote on being convinced that this is a good idea. It just doesn't make sense.
8-B-26-DP Todd (37924), August 13, 2026 at 6:55 AM
Carter Mill Drive is simply not designed or equipped to safely accommodate the significant increase in traffic that would come with the addition of 120 new homes. The road is already narrow, with limited shoulders and little room for vehicles to safely pass in many areas. Adding potentially hundreds of additional vehicle trips each day would create serious concerns for residents, school buses, emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and everyone who currently travels this road. Before a development of this size is approved, the safety and capacity of Carter Mill Drive must be addressed. Growth should not come at the expense of the safety of the families and residents who already live in this community.
9-SC-26-C William (37849), August 16, 2026 at 9:52 PM
I live west of this proposal. The traffic is already horrendous without adding the additional burden of 20 new dwellings. I would ask at most keep the density to 2 units per acre due to terrible traffic already. The entrance exit to the proposed property is in somewhat of a blind spot going both directions. Additional traffic will cause more accidents and safety concerns.
9-B-26-DP Randall (37849), August 27, 2026 at 4:10 PM
This is a horrible place for an entrance/exit for a subdivision. This road already carries more traffic than it was ever designed for and most of it is traveling well beyond the posted speed limit. We have family that lives just over this hill, and it is very dangerous pulling in and out of the driveway. I guarantee you that you are creating a situation that will result in numerous accidents. An entrance/exit to a subdivision at this location is quite frankly irresponsible and, in my opinion, shows a total disregard for public safety.
9-B-26-DP Gene (37921), August 31, 2026 at 2:58 PM
The MONDAY property line borders the entire back line of the proposed subdivision. Concerns: 1) Water drainage issues. 2) Would like to request privacy fence or tree-lined border at property line.
9-B-26-DP CHRISTINA (37849), August 31, 2026 at 4:38 PM
from the topo shown on C2.0: the site's existing contours run roughly from a low around El. 990' near W. Beaver Creek Drive/Evanel Way (southwest) up to a high point near El. 1023' - 1040' around the cul-de-sac (northeast), with Lazy Acres Subdivision bordering the site along the east/southeast side in that same elevation band. That means at least part of the new development's runoff has a natural grade toward the Lazy Acres boundary. Where is the proposed stormwater detention/BMP sited??
Are the site lines field-verified sightlines?? We have a concern about the traffic at the bottom of this blind hill. The issue is that very few people who travel this road adhear to the speed limit posted. Not many slow when approaching this intersection and there seems to be no concern from the county on getting people to slow down. Is there anythig the county can suggest to mitigate additionl issues that this development may cause?
9-B-26-DP Sandra (37849), September 9, 2026 at 1:39 PM
This property at 4114 West Beaver Creek Drive (Parcel ID 67 131) sits at the top of a blind down-going hill. At the bottom of the hill is Lazy Acres subdivision. The people from Lazy Acres have only one means of ingress and egress into the subdivision, and it discharges directly onto West Beaver Creek less than 1/8 of a mile from the property proposed for subdivision development. There will be no additional means of egress from this proposed subdivision either--except to discharge onto West Beaver Creek on a blind area. It would cause me no angst for the builder to add two homes or a duplex or even a single-family dwelling to this site. However, I highly object to a subdivision being added to discharge onto West Beaver Creek without further considering the traffic. There are no turn lanes, this is a rather narrow two-lane street, there are no warning lights or signs to indicate that the hill is blind. Additionally, the proposal is for the builder to add 5 du/acre on 8.1 acres. That would total 40+ additional homes on a highly traveled road. My vote probably doesn't matter much to the planning commission, but I DO NOT FAVOR THIS PROPOSAL until such time as the roads are taken into consideration. This lot previously had a single-dwelling home. I realize property in Powell is at a premium, but I feel that if this proposal is approved, the neighborhood will suffer.
10-G-26-RZ Amy (37919), September 17, 2026 at 4:55 PM
Im highly opposed to this rezoning. I live very close to this property. Gallaher View is already a dangerous road and increased traffic will make it more so. And please, must we tear down every little speck of woods we have left to put up more housing? Knoxville residents are sick and tired of it. Please leave the little 7 acres of woods, and the animals that live there, alone. This is not welcome.
10-F-26-RZ Lisa (37938), September 17, 2026 at 7:48 PM
I live on Johnson Vista Way and pass this home multiple times daily. I am not opposed to the approval of this change to allow a mobile home to be moved onto the land IF the property is cleaned up and maintained appropriately. There is currently at least 5 cars in various states of disrepair along with trash and unkempt yard. This is a constant eyesore. I would ask before the mobile home is allowed that the grounds be cleaned and vehicles hauled off. I think this is a reasonable request. Thank you for allowing and considering my requests.
10-A-26-HPA Kevin (37921), September 18, 2026 at 9:19 AM
This is a ridiculous plan!! I beg you not to pass this subdivision. NICKLE ROAD IS A ONE LANE road in certain parts - and with the immense amount of construction traffic this would bring, it would be disastrous. I cant wait till a dump truck comes at me head on. Ill just sit and wait for him to back up :) Furthermore The entrance to this subdivision is on a BLIND HILL thats so steep itll make your stomach drop if you go over it too fast. There are plenty of other areas in town we can add homes. Nickle road is NOT one of them Id be happy to personally show you the major issues with this development.
10-A-26-HPA Rae (37921), September 18, 2026 at 9:31 AM
Please reconsider this development it has so many impacts on a road that is tiny. This road is barely passable in some spots now, the extra traffic will only make getting off Nickle Rd onto Western or pleasant ridge a nightmare. Increased accidents too. Plus what about our tiny school that is already over-crowded. We already have outside portable units being used. Not to mention a school that is historic and has had no expansion or updates. This is farm land out here not intended for subdivisions. Please consider all the issues that come along with putting a subdivision in. There is not room!!
10-A-26-HPA Melissa (37921), September 18, 2026 at 11:46 AM
I am against the hillside variance exception. This just makes for more overdeveloped neighborhood chaos. Frankly, I am against the size of this entire development. There are no plans to improve Nickel Road. This will be a neighborhood traffic disaster. Scale it down and you wont need a hillside variance plus the traffic wont be as much of an issue. We dont need to be shoehorning housing into existing neighborhoods and screwing them up.
10-A-26-HPA Judy (37921), September 18, 2026 at 11:52 AM
Please review the boundary line of 6216 Flint Rd. I have a 20 year old fence and wooden shed that I am stating I have adverse possession of this property that I have maintained for 45 years
10-A-26-HPA Donna (37921), September 20, 2026 at 2:22 PM
The hillside protection area was initiated using code requirements. The utility easement was developed under a plan as well. Both were put in place for reasons. The applicant was not in any way deceived about the property. If they didn't do their due diligence that is their issue. The hillside protection should stand as written. There will be significant erosion on this property even with the protected area intact. Please deny this request.
10-G-26-RZ Robert (37919), September 20, 2026 at 3:40 PM
I oppose the rezoning of the 7.6 wooded acres on S. Gallaher View Road from Agricultural to Planned Residential. The road is already dangerous. We don't need more traffic on it. The wooded acreage is one of very few habitats for wildlife in the area. The proposed rezoning would increase density, traffic, and noise thereby negatively impacting area property values.
10-G-26-RZ Valerie (37919), September 20, 2026 at 5:57 PM
I own my residence on Kingsdale Rd, which backs up to Gallaher View Rd - directly across from the proposed rezoning property. I request that you vote no on rezoning this land to planned residential. The property is on a dangerous curve and blind spot on Gallaher with a documented crash history that includes crashes with injuries. We are already seeing single home houses and vacant land on Gallaher and Westland being bulldozed for multi-unit apartments and residences, exponentially increasing the burden on our resources and infrastructure: more daily traffic on the same size roads, destroyed natural habitats, an increase in construction noise and damage from heavy construction equipment. Rezoning 637 S Gallaher View Rd will add more traffic congestion on the most dangerous part of Gallaher and will make driving less safe for the teenagers and residents of our neighborhood. I turn left off Gallaher into my neighborhood right at 637 S Gallaher, and multiple times a week have dodged speeding cars on the curve. In addition to the increased density and traffic, there will be months and months of construction noise, land closures, construction traffic, loss of wooded buffer and natural habitat for rehabilitated owls released in July, a potentially negative impact to property values. Please vote no on rezoning this property.
10-G-26-RZ Lu (37919), September 21, 2026 at 4:17 PM
Our property is located directly across the street from 637 S Gallaher View Road. We respectfully ask the Planning Commission to carefully evaluate the road capacity, traffic safety, construction impacts, tree and wildlife habitat, drainage, and compatibility of the proposed density with the surrounding neighborhood before making a decision on Case #10-G-26-RZ. Thank you for taking the concerns of area residents into consideration. Dominic and Lu Jan P. [redacted]
10-G-26-RZ Jerry (37919), September 21, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Leave this area untouched. we must have this area for various animals to exist.... two lane street cannot handle anymore traffic... area is already overbuilt...stop this now..... keep me informed .... we will be watching... thank you much.... Jerry C. resident
10-G-26-RZ Igor (37923), September 21, 2026 at 7:09 PM
Dear Members of the Knox County Planning Commission, I live in the area and urge you to deny 10-G-26-RZ, or at minimum hold density close to what the current zoning allows. S Gallaher View is very narrow and curving, with a documented history of crashes, including injury crashes. I've had a near miss on this road myself, despite being a careful driver, simply because of how narrow and curvy it is. The road is already absorbing traffic from the 27-lot development approved at 860 S Gallaher View last year, which your staff estimated could generate up to 364 daily trips, plus other new housing nearby. Each case looks small on its own, but together they add far more traffic than this road was built for. These 7.6 acres are also heavily wooded and buffer existing homes. Once the land is rezoned and cleared, that canopy can't be replaced. If you do approve PR, please cap density well below the request and add conditions requiring road improvements and preservation of mature trees along the property edges. Thank you for your consideration.
10-G-26-RZ Meredith (37919), September 21, 2026 at 8:54 PM
I often drive by this expanse of trees on Gallagher View Rd and marvel at what a rarity it is these days to see such a natural habitat undisturbed. It's a beautiful oasis for the neighborhood and creates much needed shade. I know development is inevitable, but please try to preserve as many trees as possible, and take a care for the many insects and animals that call this area home. Thank you.
10-B-26-RZ Jim (37932), September 23, 2026 at 12:21 PM
I ask that the commission consider the impact of increased current traffic on this two-lane section of Hardin Valley Road that is situated just after a curve in the road when driving West. I travel this section of Hardin Valley Road nearly every day and have seen many near misses at the curve with East and West bound traffic at the same time. If approved for rezoning to residential from agricultural, the commission, at the very least should require the developer to widen Hardin Valley Road in this area by installing a turn lane for both directions at any proposed entrance to the property from Hardin Valley Road. Additionally, a traffic study should be done with the results reviewed by an appropriate firm to determine if any additional traffic control measures are required, such as reduced speed limit, traffic control devices, and signage. Thank you for considering my comments.
10-B-26-RZ Jonathan (37932), September 24, 2026 at 2:17 PM
live very close to this proposed development and am not opposed to growth in Hardin Valley. However, our infrastructure has not kept pace with the growth we have already experienced. Hardin Valley Road regularly has long lines and standstill traffic during morning and evening hours, with frequent accidents and near misses around N Campbell Station and The Brook at Hardin Valley. Additional residential development will add even more traffic to an already strained corridor. Of particular concern is the Parent Responsibility Zone (PRZ). Knox County Schools does not provide bus transportation for elementary students within 1 mile of their school or middle and high school students within 1.5 miles. Parents are responsible for getting these students to school. The proposed development is approximately 0.6 miles from Hardin Valley Elementary and well within the PRZ for Middle and Academy, yet there is no continuous sidewalk connection. Families may therefore live within walking distance and receive no school bus transportation, but still have no safe way for their children to walk to school. The practical result is more parents driving and more traffic during already congested school hours. If this development moves forward, I respectfully ask that the developer be required to provide appropriate turn lanes and extend the sidewalk from The Brook, past State Farm and the church, to the existing sidewalks at Food City.
10-G-26-RZ Wayne (37919), September 27, 2026 at 4:03 PM
S. Gallaher View in this section is an extremely narrow road with many areas of limited visibility. Adding additional dwellings along this area will create a dangerous hazard for traffic. Construction of dwellings on the steep grade that is on the property could cause massive erosion into the bottom of the property and pollution to the watershed.
10-B-26-RZ Mark (37932), September 28, 2026 at 9:04 AM
Further study of storm water runoff and the planned 30-foot easement along Conner Creek needs to be performed. The new neighborhood to the north is part of the Conner watershed and already has water issues with the new construction. Also consider that the 100- year flood level sits at approximately 300 feet wide along Conner Creek at the narrowest section and exceeds 600 feet wide in some parts. How would all of this new construction impact the stream protection and hillside protection areas? Hillside protected area is almost a quarter of the parcel with stream protection covering almost an additional 25%. What is the point of designating something hillside protection or stream protection if a developer can just come in and have it rezoned and developed?
10-G-26-RZ Tyler (37919), September 28, 2026 at 12:45 PM
I live right across the street from the property at 637 S. Gallaher View Road and I oppose the proposed rezoning from Agricultural to PR. The decisions made about this land will directly affect my home. S. Gallaher View is already a dangerous road with a history of crashes, including injury crashes. Adding more traffic to an already busy road will create more problems, which concerns me as a parent who has kids that play in a yard that backs up to S. Gallaher. The large wooded area is one of the reasons we purchased property here. It is unnecessary to remove the beautiful mature forest that exists here and severs as a habitat for wildlife, including recently released rehabilitated owls. I urge you to please vote no on rezoning this area.
10-A-26-HPA Katie (37921), September 28, 2026 at 12:50 PM
Many properties in the adjacent Cumberland Estates neighborhood have problems with stormwater runoff during heavy rains. There are several homes downhill from this planned subdivision, that would experience increased water flow during rain events, including a new build at the corner of Wilkshire Drive and Flint Rd. Part of the site plan that indicates dense tree cover is under powerlines, and is not dense trees but kept clear for access. Currently the forested area protects the properties downhill from the planned subdivision from water flowing from this direction. Removing the trees and disturbing more hillside would remove this protection.
10-SB-26-F Philip (37919), September 28, 2026 at 1:11 PM
The intersection at Dunkirk and South Gallagher View is already extremely dangerous. Adding 98 homes would further increase the danger that exists and will only continue to get worse once the apartment complex at the end of South Gallagher View is completed. Property values, construction traffic, and lane closures are some other concerns that need to be considered.
10-A-26-HPA Donna (37921), September 28, 2026 at 1:13 PM
The attached pdf shows the flooding in my front yard on October 8, 2021 when the same applicant began clearing when their first application was submitted. They started without proper permitting and zero erosion control. A stop work order was issued by the city when they investigated my complaint. This applicant has already shown their disregard for the rules. You can’t put back forty year old trees when they overstep approved areas. View Attachment
10-G-26-RZ Marcel (37923), September 28, 2026 at 8:42 PM
The rezoning of this property is ill-conceived and should not be approved. I would like to give the following arguments why this proposal should not be approved. There are at the moment three school bus stops on this road. The increased traffic -- not even accounting for the additional traffic from the newest development at intersection with Westland Drive -- will make it an even more dangerous situation for our children.
The topography does not lend itself to development. There is, in my estimation, at least a 100 foot elevation difference between the north side and south side of the road. Besides the fact that such a steep gradient is not amenable to building housing, any development will affect drainage. By clearing the vegetation, waterflow will be severely affected, affecting hillside drainage, intercepting surface runoff and trigger soil erosion. I am not aware of any plan to mitigate these risks. It is not clear if property in such a topological environment will be able to obtain insurance with such high risk of potential damage.
Furthermore, there are high voltage lines that run directly across the property. How will their operational reliability be ensured when these lines are more exposed to erosion? How will the neighborhood and development be protected from adverse affects of downed power lines given the increased frequency of violent storms that are being observed?
10-G-26-RZ Mira (37919), September 29, 2026 at 3:47 PM
We live near to 637 S. Gallaher View Road and drive it daily. We have always been relieved as we drive by the wooded area that is would never be able to be developed. Now we and our neighbors are shocked that there is a proposal to rezone and develop this area. The roads are narrow and curvy, the steep drop off in the wooded area and this is the home to many wildlife are some of the reasons to never develop this area. Also, the quality of life for those in homes around the wooded area would diminish - both for the humans and wildlife. We are asking this Planning Commission to leave the natural state of this area alone and protect it from developers. Thank you.
10-G-26-RZ Chris (37919), September 29, 2026 at 6:52 PM
As a longtime homeowner in this area, I have enjoyed the relative quiet of our neighborhood and the convenience of being close to most everything one could want. I suspect others seek the same, however at what expense? The uptick in traffic in Knoxville in general requires road improvements to accommodate the increase. Unfortunately most of the work needed has yet to be done all while more and more housing increases at a frenetic pace leaving current homeowners with ever increasing property taxes with a dwindling quality of life.
8-B-26-DP Christina (37924), September 30, 2026 at 7:43 AM
I live in this subdivision and the road in and out doesn't support the traffic we have now. It's a narrow road that you have to get into the ditch to pass.
8-B-26-DP Kara (37871), September 30, 2026 at 8:53 AM
Carter Mill Road and S Carter School Road cannot handle all the traffic. We already have issues with the amount of traffic coming out of Carter Mill onto Carter School Road there have been multiple wrecks at this intersection already. Its getting more and more dangerous in this area. More house and more traffic is going to be deadly unless there are major road improvements in our area.
8-B-26-DP Elizabeth (37924), September 30, 2026 at 9:24 AM
Please, we ask you to deny this.. our community is struggling now in our schools our teachers on our roads.. our community is packed to its limits as is please deny this
8-B-26-DP Kristin (37924), September 30, 2026 at 9:57 AM
We have lived in both carter mill and Carter ridge subdivision for 18 years. The traffic on Carter mill road has increased significantly the last few years with the extension of Carter ridge. The road is narrow and dangerous and barely enough room for 2 cars to pass , and it cannot accommodate more traffic from another subdivision. There are farms on Carter mill that we donât want to see harmed as well. The traffic on the narrow mccubbins road will be pose more risks as well. Thank you so much for your time!.
8-B-26-DP Nikki (37871), September 30, 2026 at 10:00 AM
I wanna start by saying that I have family and their friends that live on this road. Driving on this road has always been a hazard just because it’s such a narrow road. A car cannot safely pass by school bus without going off the edge a little or pulling over into a driveway. This causes me great concern for the children riding the school buses and the community members. This narrow roadway and the impending heavy traffic is a recipe for disaster. Someone is going to get severely injured. This isn’t just about the housing. It’s about the safety of the people especially the children in our community. Please consider how incredibly hazardous this can be. As a mother with children at Carter Elementary and Carter high school I already know that their class sizes are at maximum and the school cannot handle all the children that are coming with this impending housing build. Which means our community members and their children are going to suffer. The teachers are going to suffer. The staff are going to suffer. This is going to bring nothing good to our community. The only thing it is bringing is hard times for students and staff at our schools and safety hazards to the community. Please do the right thing, protect our little community and protect our children.
8-B-26-DP Julian (37924), September 30, 2026 at 10:02 AM
I understand that Knoxville is growing, but where does all of this end. Developers do not care about where they put up houses because they are only interested in the bottom line. My family and I moved away from West Knoxville because of this same problem. Developers would rather throw up houses as quick as possible without thinking about the infrastructure that must first be in place. Money is the primary motivator in this conversation and it is understandable how it can sway the conversation. It would be interesting to see if the shoe was on the other foot and these developers had to deal with the problems that come from rapid growth. We would to this area because it was quiet and we like being away from the city, but it seems like more and more politicians and zoning boards only care about who is willing to pay the most. More houses means more people and this area is currently not equipped for that. Most of the city is struggling because of this exact problem. Leave this area alone until you are able to improve the infrastructure that is needed. By rushing this process you neglect all of the people that call this place home. Knoxville may be a boom town right now, but if you continue to push the housing limits, you will very quickly see people start moving away because they do not want to be subjected to the impact of rapid growth. Stop letting big developers buy your votes and start letting the community decide their future.
10-G-26-RZ James (37919), September 30, 2026 at 10:50 AM
We oppose this rezoning for a number of reasons. First, S. Gallaher is already a dangerous two-lane road with blind curves where people often drive too fast. Additional traffic from a multi-dwelling development would only make matters worse. We also believe the additional traffic on S. Gallaher would negatively impact our property values. People would look at the narrow road to our subdivision and be inclined to make a lower offer than the current value of our homes. Maybe most importantly, this wooded habitat is home to deer, foxes, raccoons, foxes and other types of animals. There have also been rehabilitated owls released into this area and they keep various vermin under control. Surely there are better places than this wooded area for a development. Please register our opposition to this rezoning.
8-B-26-DP Belynda (37914), September 30, 2026 at 11:04 AM
The infrastructure in our area, Carter-Thorngrove-Strawberry Plains Pike, cannot handle more houses, i.e. TRAFFIC, schools are overloaded, etc. PLEASE DO NOT PASS THIS! Thank you.
8-B-26-DP Thomas (37924), September 30, 2026 at 12:10 PM
I am a resident of East Knox County, and I am asking that the county carefully consider the impact of the proposed 121-home Phase 9 development. I am not opposed to growth or to new families coming to our community. My concern is whether our roads, schools, emergency services, utilities, and other infrastructure can realistically keep up with the amount of development being proposed in this area. Carter Mill Road and the surrounding roads are already heavily impacted by traffic, and continued subdivision development will only add to that burden. I am also concerned about the cumulative effect of adding hundreds of homes across multiple developments rather than considering each phase individually. Most importantly, I worry about losing the rural character and sense of community that make East Knox County special. Once open land, farmland, and green space are developed, we cannot get them back. I respectfully ask that Phase 9 be evaluated not simply on whether 121 homes can fit on this property, but on whether our existing community and infrastructure can responsibly support them. Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who already call East Knox County home.
10-G-26-RZ Vicky (37919), September 30, 2026 at 12:47 PM
I would like to voice my opposition to the rezoning of the 7.6 wooded acres at 637 S. Gallaher Rd for the following reasons: 1. First and foremost would be the additional traffic on S Gallaher View Rd which is already dangerous as it is very narrow and curvy. 2. Another housing development, recently approved and less than a mile away, will be adding to the challenging traffic along this road as well. 3. This heavily wooded area currently serves as a noise buffer and wildlife habitat. As a lifelong resident of Knox County, I ask that you not ruin another area of our county for those that live nearby. If you are not familiar with this area, please come look for yourself before approving this proposal.
8-B-26-DP Linda (37924), September 30, 2026 at 1:08 PM
Please vote no on the additional units. Our roads are not equipped to handle all this traffic. Accidents are happening already. We don't have the infrastructure in place to keep building and it appears no one cares to fix that issue.
8-B-26-DP Danika (37924), September 30, 2026 at 2:16 PM
You need to vote no on this development. Carter Mill Dr and McCubbins Rd are not suitable for the amount of road traffic this additional development will bring. Part of Carter Mill Dr is so narrow that itâs very difficult for cars to even pass each other. Add on - the infrastructure out here is severely lacking. We have that tiny rural metro station, no sheriff substation, 1 main grocery store & the schools are at capacity. My understanding is that when developers change these plots - theyâre supposed to pay a fee to the county to help with changing the infrastructure out here. Iâm wondering where this money is going because aside from a sidewalk that goes nowhere - we have yet to see any sort of improvements.
10-B-26-SU Windy (37912), September 30, 2026 at 2:20 PM
We are against this happening for the fact that our property runs right beside it and we will lose ALL of our privacy. This property has been in my family since 1988 and we have always felt safe. If his happens then you will be taken not only our privacy but security. All the added traffic on a small road that can’t handle it. And all the traffic of cars and people we do not know, right in our front, side and backyard having access to our property and children/grandchildren. We will never feel safe again. This time a residenceal area this should not be allowed. Please we are begging you not to let this happen. We have lived here for almost 40 years and love our home. Please do not take our privacy, safety and that feeling of love from our family. Thank you the Parton family
8-C-26-PA Katie (37909), September 30, 2026 at 4:05 PM
We believe families should have choices. Not every family wants to maintain a large rural property, but many families also don't want to raise their children in an apartment or multifamily setting. Our vision is to provide that middle ground: high-quality single-family homes, private yards, a safe neighborhood environment, and a community where children can grow up and play with other children. The requested increase from two homes per acre to three is intended to allow us to create a more thoughtfully planned community while preserving the property's basin, gully, and catchment area as natural space for drainage, vegetation, and wildlife. Our objective is not simply more homes. It is a better-planned family community, one that provides quality housing, encourages a sense of community, preserves meaningful natural areas, and creates a neighborhood families will be proud to call home. View Attachment
8-D-26-PA Katie (37909), September 30, 2026 at 4:08 PM
We believe families should have choices. Not every family wants to maintain a large rural property, but many families also don't want to raise their children in an apartment or multifamily setting. Our vision is to provide that middle ground: high-quality single-family homes, private yards, a safe neighborhood environment, and a community where children can grow up and play with other children. The requested increase from two homes per acre to three is intended to allow us to create a more thoughtfully planned community while preserving the property's basin, gully, and catchment area as natural space for drainage, vegetation, and wildlife. Our objective is not simply more homes. It is a better-planned family community, one that provides quality housing, encourages a sense of community, preserves meaningful natural areas, and creates a neighborhood families will be proud to call home. View Attachment
10-G-26-RZ Richard (37919), September 30, 2026 at 4:46 PM
Myself and many of our neighbors are concerned about the potential development of this 7.6 acres. Gallaher View road is already very heavy with traffic. The land is home to lots of wildlife, including deer and red foxes, and rehabilitated owls. Can't we please have a piece of woodland (this piece is too steep to develop easily anyway) that is left alone and not developed! Please say no to the rezoning of this land. Thank you, Richard M.
8-B-26-DP Todd (37924), September 30, 2026 at 5:26 PM
As a long time resident of Carter Mill I am strongly against this new proposed development . These subdivisions are already overdeveloped and adding more will only cause more congestion. Carter Mill Rd going to McCubbins road is barely wide enough for 2 side by sides yet alone two vehicles or construction equipment. Please reconsider and work on getting infrastructure and road better equipped to handle it. I ask that you Commissioners travel on that road yourself especially when meeting another vehicle oncoming. Also come around 5pm and try getting out of Woodale Church rd onto Strawberry Plains...its getting impossible. This over developing need to be halted we don't want it.
10-G-26-RZ Ava (37919), September 30, 2026 at 6:29 PM
Dear Members of the Knox County Planning Commission, I am a homeowner who lives directly across the street from the property at 637 S. Gallaher View Road, and I respectfully urge you to deny the requested rezoning from Agricultural to Planned Residential.
10-G-26-RZ David (37923), September 30, 2026 at 6:45 PM
I am writing in opposition to this proposal and my intent to fight this to the end. This proposal will add more traffic to an already congested area. Any discussion of traffic studies or expected traffic impact is a farce, as there are already multiple developments in the area that are already going to add to congestion. We don't know the impact that the new units at Westland and Gallaher View and the massive development near Gleason and Ebenezer will have on this area. This proposal cannot actually take into account the real effect that all of this will have on our area. Additionally, this is a mature wooded area home to significant wildlife. What plan does this have for the owls, deer, coyotes, etc.? The answer is undoubtedly none. We cannot continue to grow simply for the sake of growth. Not every wooded area in Knox County must be developed. Not when this comes at the expense of those that have lived in the area for years. This is entirely unnecessary and can't possibly pass muster. It's time for this body to step up and not approve the destruction of every square inch of Knox County. We must wait and see the effect that all the other projects will have on this area before adding additional burdens upon our roadways, the wildlife, and our citizens. Best, David R. Houbre Attorney at law
10-G-26-RZ Valerie (37919), September 30, 2026 at 7:18 PM
Please distribute attached document to the committee for review re: case 10-G-26-RZ. The present application is materially different from the July request. The previous request sought PR zoning at up to 4 dwelling units per acre; the current request seeks up to 1 dwelling unit per acre. This reduction lowers the potential number of dwellings and reduces staffs estimated traffic impact from 333 to 87 daily vehicle trips. The objection is not that the two applications are identical. The issue is whether the reduced density, without a binding development plan or complete transportation review, resolves the unchanged roadway and environmental concerns. Staff acknowledges that existing Agricultural zoning and requested PR zoning allow the same general density of approximately 1 dwelling unit per acre. The record therefore should explain why a zoning amendment is necessary, rather than merely advantageous for a preferred arrangement or clustering of dwellings.
10-G-26-RZ Karl (37919), September 30, 2026 at 8:30 PM
I would like to voice my concern for the development of this land. The acreage is located immediately across from the entrance to our neighborhood, Cambridge. South Gallaher Road is a very narrow, curvy, hilly, and dangerous road. In addition it is a main thoroughfare for cars to use as a cut through from Westland Road to Gleason Road and Kingston Pike. Much development has been done on South Gallaher Road over the past 30 years with no improvement at all to the road. Our fear is that an additional housing development will only cause a more dangerous situation for the existing residents. The density of our area is already stretching Gallaher View to the max. Construction on the road would most certainly require road closures and delays to an already hard to navigate road, resulting in a dangerous situation for all. This land is the only wooded and natural area left in the immediate area and should be left for the existing wildlife that call it home. Disturbing the area would disrupt that wildlife and the rehabilitated owls that were released in July. Please give serious thought and consideration to our concerns and opposition. We appreciate your help in this matter.
10-G-26-RZ Melinda (37919), September 30, 2026 at 9:55 PM
I strongly oppose the building of any dwellings on this site. The last thing we need on this already highly travelled road is more traffic. S.Gallaher View is narrow and curving, with a documented crash history, including injury crashes. With the new housing units being built on the corner of Westland and Gallaher, this will only get worse. The construction of the project will be an ongoing issue for months, and, more importantly, the wildlife habitat will be destroyed. I have read the other comments and I agree with everyone. Please do NOT go forward with this project.
10-G-26-RZ Scott (37919), September 30, 2026 at 10:08 PM
I strongly oppose this zoning change. Living very close to this location, I'm familiar with this property along a narrow stretch of road on a sharp curve that is wholly unsuitable for development. The traffic burden on S. Gallaher has already increased significantly in recent years. Adding more volume through residences on this sharp turn is unsafe, irresponsible, and will irreversibly damage one of the remaining pockets of natural habitat that contributes to the identity of our community. View Attachment
8-B-26-DP Kenneth (37924), September 30, 2026 at 10:28 PM
There are several concerns with this project and other in this district. Strawberry Plains Pike at the school is current a busy area of the community and Carter Mill Road is currently only a 2 lane road and narrow. I understand the sidewalk but that will limit the ability to expand the road if needed due to additional traffic. Other access roads are also smaller and inadequate. Has a current traffic impact study been done and subitted to the county for current capacity and projected numbers? Drawing show they are only putting the neighborhood road in and will be a steep road. With East Tennessee weather it will be hard to maintain and control runoff. The topograhy in the Carter area has alot of natural sinkholes and need to verify that the "ponds" will not be built at a sinkhole location and downstream properties needs to be adressed. The actual house lots will only be buildable in certain areas and the lots will have a majority of it be too steep to build on. Lastly, the surrounding schools are already overcrowed and there is aready over 1200 house to be built on the books to be built in the Carter area. The existing infrastructure system is already having issues and updates need to also be made to accomidate the growth of the community.
10-G-26-RZ Sharon (37919), October 1, 2026 at 5:53 AM
My neighborhood backs up to the property that is being reviewed for rezoning. To rezone this property would be a huge mistake by local government. Gallaher View is a dangerous road. It's already difficult to pull out onto Gallaher View because it's used as a cut through from Westland to Kingston Pike. It's a curvy narrow road, and people already drive too fast on it. The wooded area is home to a variety of wildlife. We frequently see deer, wild turkeys, owls and more. The grading and removal of trees would seriously impact the integrity of the land around those seven acres. We have very few green spaces in this area. We have lost many others in the last few years. There is already development at the south end of Gallaher. Any thing more would cause overcrowding and overdevelopment that would have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhoods for years to come.
8-B-26-DP Daniel (37924), October 1, 2026 at 5:54 AM
Carter Mill Road, McCubbins Road, and Wooddale Church Road are all unsafe. Particularly Carter Mill Road, which is only 1.5 lanes wide, with rutted drop offs on each side. This development will significantly worsen that problem, because those roads are used to access Straw Plains Pike near exit 398. Any developer interested in building here without fixing these roads does not have the best interests of the community at heart. Please do not approve without a meaningful plan for widening Carter Mill Road and possibly other roads. Sincerely, a TN licensed attorney and homeowner in Carter Mill with longstanding ties to the area.
10-G-26-RZ Stephen (37919), October 1, 2026 at 6:13 AM
We have lived and raised our family in the Woodbrook Park Subdivision which is positioned against the area in question to be re-zoned. This area of Gallagher View road Cannot handle the road traffic if another plot of houses are built. I agree 100% with a letter submitted by our neighbor Hannah Stuart who lives on Brooktree Road. This would obviously disrupt the wildlife eco system that has been thriving in these woods for years. The site is on a slope which would mean a tremendous amount of dirt etc would have to be brought in which Will cause significant drainage issues not only for that area but our subdivision which sits below. Please reconsider zoning this for residential, there are Many people in this area that Will be affected and do not want this to happen.
10-G-26-RZ Jo Ann (37919), October 1, 2026 at 6:34 AM
This property is on the almost 360 degree curve on Gallaher View Rd - a road used by young drivers attending Bearden High School. There is all ready construction of 64 additional dwellings near the railroad tracks that will add traffic onto this street. Another consideration is the high voltage TVA power lines that goes thru the middle of this property that makes placement of entrances at more dangerous locations My personal concern is the added runoff of water that will flow thru my neighborhood as we are located down the hill from this potential development. Please deny this request for a change of land use.
8-B-26-DP Alexis (37924), October 1, 2026 at 6:58 AM
I strongly oppose the proposed 121-home development on Carter Mill Road. People choose to live outside Knoxville city limits for a reason. We want peace, quiet, nature, open space, and the rural way of life that East Knox County provides. We would prefer to keep our community the way it is instead of turning every available piece of land into another subdivision. These narrow roads were not built for this amount of traffic, and the roads should be improved before any large development is approved. We want to enjoy our natural surroundings and the peace that comes with living outside the city. Please listen to the residents who already live here and protect the character of East Knox County.
9-A-26-SU Philip (37921), October 1, 2026 at 8:42 AM
I would like to express my concern for this proposed property development. With the added properties over the past couple of years to Savoy Street, we have had an increase in car accidents and improper parking on a street that does not adequately accommodate parking and passing traffic, with this additional property being a two family or more dwelling being added, the improper parking and cars accidents could increase drastically, furthermore a two family house or duplex would not fit the aesthetics of the existing area.
10-G-26-RZ Jennifer (37919), October 1, 2026 at 10:10 AM
I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed rezoning of 10G-26R-Z from Agricultural to Planned Residential.
My biggest concern is traffic and road safety on Gallaher View Road. This is not a straight, wide road designed to accommodate a substantial increase in traffic. It has numerous curves, limited visibility, and areas with poor sight distance, creating an already challenging and potentially dangerous driving environment.
Adding a large number of homes would bring significantly more vehicles onto Gallaher View and surrounding roads. I am concerned that the existing road infrastructure cannot safely support this increase.
This is about more than inconvenience, it is about the safety of residents who live here and travel these roads every day. Before approving this rezoning, I ask the County Commission to determine whether the roads have the capacity and safety infrastructure necessary to support the proposed development.
I respectfully ask the County Commission to deny rezoning case 10G-26R-Z.
Thank you for considering the concerns of Gallaher View residents.
10-G-26-RZ Jim and Shannon (37919), October 1, 2026 at 11:06 AM
We live in close proximity to the proposed development off Gallagher View Rd. This section of Gallagher View is already hazardous to travel. This proposal just increases those hazards. Construction traffic and lane closures are very likely to create significant access and exit issues for current residents of existing neighborhoods in the area. The wildlife in the area depends on the canopy provided by all the mature trees. Removal forces that wildlife out. PLEASE take all of this into consideration when making your decision
10-G-26-RZ Meagan (37919), October 1, 2026 at 11:19 AM
My home backs up to Gallagher View Road. There is already construction underway to build a huge amount of homes at the south end of the street. This road cannot sustain more development. It is a two lane, dangerous street with blind curves. We ask that you leave the small amount of habitat that remains for the animals that live in this area. We don't want more development.
10-G-26-RZ Laura (37919), October 1, 2026 at 12:09 PM
I also live in the Woodbrook Park subdivision downstream from the subject property. I share similar opinions to those expressed. I thank the planning commission for seeking to limit the density on this site. However, I would strongly suggest that the planning commission at least require a development plan be submitted before approving any change in zoning. There needs to be some idea of where and how a development would be clustered on the site. And please keep the density at no more than currently allowed. This is a very dangerous road as it currently exists.