Subdivision

Concept Plan

10-SB-02-C

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE variances 1-2 because the site's topography restricts compliance with the Subdivision Regulations, and the proposed variances will not create a traffic hazard.

APPROVE the concept plan subject to 11 conditions


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Connection to sanitary sewer and meeting any other relevant requirements of the Knox County Health Department.
2.. Provision of street names which are consistent with the Uniform Street Naming and Addressing System within Knox County (County Ord. 91-1-102).
3. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.
4. Compaction of fill areas to be done in accordance with the requirements of the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works.
5. Place a note on the final plat that all lots will have access only to the internal street system.
6. Meeting all requirements of the approved use on review development plan.
7. A final plat application based on this concept plan will not be accepted for review by the MPC until certification of design plan approval has been submitted to the MPC staff.
8. Relocating the entrance or removing the hump in Greenwell Rd., north of the proposed entrance, in order to provide 300' of sight distance in each direction at the entrance to this development.
9. Certification on the final plat by the applicant's engineer that there is 300' of sight distance in both directions on Greenwell Rd.
10. The geotechnical study called for in note #8 must be completed and approved by the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works prior to any of the identified lots obtaining final plat approval.
11. Meeting all applicable requirements and obtaining all necessary permits from the Tenn. Dept. of Environment and Conservation.

Applicant Request

+
Subdivision
Southland Group on Greenwell Rd.
Lots
100 (Split)
Proposed Density
2.19 du/ac

Variances

1. Intersection grade variance from 1% to 3% at Road A and Road B.
2. Intersection grade variance from 1% to 3% at Road E and Road D.


Property Information

+
Location
Northeast side of Greenwell Rd., north of E. Emory Rd.

Commission District 7


Size
45.83 acres

Sector
North County

Currently on the Property
Vacant

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE variances 1-2 because the site's topography restricts compliance with the Subdivision Regulations, and the proposed variances will not create a traffic hazard.

APPROVE the concept plan subject to 11 conditions

1. Connection to sanitary sewer and meeting any other relevant requirements of the Knox County Health Department.
2.. Provision of street names which are consistent with the Uniform Street Naming and Addressing System within Knox County (County Ord. 91-1-102).
3. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.
4. Compaction of fill areas to be done in accordance with the requirements of the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works.
5. Place a note on the final plat that all lots will have access only to the internal street system.
6. Meeting all requirements of the approved use on review development plan.
7. A final plat application based on this concept plan will not be accepted for review by the MPC until certification of design plan approval has been submitted to the MPC staff.
8. Relocating the entrance or removing the hump in Greenwell Rd., north of the proposed entrance, in order to provide 300' of sight distance in each direction at the entrance to this development.
9. Certification on the final plat by the applicant's engineer that there is 300' of sight distance in both directions on Greenwell Rd.
10. The geotechnical study called for in note #8 must be completed and approved by the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works prior to any of the identified lots obtaining final plat approval.
11. Meeting all applicable requirements and obtaining all necessary permits from the Tenn. Dept. of Environment and Conservation.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE variances 1-2 because the site's topography restricts compliance with the Subdivision Regulations, and the proposed variances will not create a traffic hazard.

APPROVE the concept plan subject to 11 conditions

Details of Action
1. Connection to sanitary sewer and meeting any other relevant requirements of the Knox County Health Department.
2.. Provision of street names which are consistent with the Uniform Street Naming and Addressing System within Knox County (County Ord. 91-1-102).
3. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.
4. Compaction of fill areas to be done in accordance with the requirements of the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works.
5. Place a note on the final plat that all lots will have access only to the internal street system.
6. Meeting all requirements of the approved use on review development plan.
7. A final plat application based on this concept plan will not be accepted for review by the MPC until certification of design plan approval has been submitted to the MPC staff.
8. Relocating the entrance or removing the hump in Greenwell Rd., north of the proposed entrance, in order to provide 300' of sight distance in each direction at the entrance to this development.
9. Certification on the final plat by the applicant's engineer that there is 300' of sight distance in both directions on Greenwell Rd.
10. The geotechnical study called for in note #8 must be completed and approved by the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works prior to any of the identified lots obtaining final plat approval.
11. Meeting all applicable requirements and obtaining all necessary permits from the Tenn. Dept. of Environment and Conservation.

What's next?

+
After the Planning CommissionAppeals of Concept Plans and Final Plats are filed with Chancery CourtThe Process
Applicant

Southland Group on Greenwell Rd.

Southland Group, Inc.


Case History