Special Use

11-B-22-SU

Recommended for approval by the Planning Commission

Approve the request for a drive-through facility in the C-G-1 zoning district, subject to 7 conditions.


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
10248 KINGSTON PIKE

Southeast quadrant of the intersection of Kingston Pk and S. David Ln

Council District 2


Size
0.66 acres

Sector
Southwest County

Land Use Designation? GC (General Commercial)


Currently on the Property
Commercial

Growth Plan
N/A (Within City Limits)

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
1. Meeting the requirements of principal use standards for drive-through facilities (Article 9.3.F) of the City of Knoxville Zoning Ordinance.
2. Meeting the requirements of Article 13 (Signs) of the City of Knoxville Zoning Ordinance.
3. Installation of landscaping per the requirements of Article 12 (Landscaping) of the City of Knoxville Zoning Ordinance or the applicant may request an alternative landscape design, as per Article 12.2.D.
4. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Department of Engineering.
5. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Tennessee Department of Transportation.
6. Meeting all other applicable requirements of the City of Knoxville Zoning Ordinance.
7. Meeting all the application requirements of the City of Knoxville Plans Review and Inspections Department.

With the conditions noted above, this request meets the requirements of C-G-1 zoning, the principal use standards for drive-through facilities, and other criteria for approval of a special use.
Disposition Summary
Approve the request for a drive-through facility in the C-G-1 zoning district, subject to 7 conditions.

What's next?

+
After the Planning Commission
Planning Commission decisions on Special Use (SU) cases are final unless appealed.

SU cases do not move forward to City Council unless the request is to remove a planned district designation from the zoning map.

Applicant

Pavilion Development Company


Case History