Download as PDF

Special Use

11-C-23-SU

Related Cases

11-SD-23-C

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

Approve the Special Use to modify the previously approved planned district for the Clear Spring Plantation subdivision (AKA The Highlands at Clear Spring).

See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

− +
  • Land Use
      Current
      Agriculture/Forestry/Vacant Land
      Proposed
      Removal of the condition to extend Parasol Ln. to Autumn Creek Dr.

Property Information

− +
Location
0 Autumn Creek Dr.

East side of Autumn Creek Dr, northeast of Glen Creek Rd

Council District 4

Size
7,750 square feet
Sector
Northeast County

Land Use Designation? LDR (Low Density Residential)

Currently on the Property
Agriculture/Forestry/Vacant Land
Growth Plan
Urban Growth Area (Inside City Limits)
  • Utilities
      Sewer
      Knoxville Utilities Board
      Water
      Northeast Knox Utility District

Case Notes

− +
Staff Recommendation
Approve the Special Use to modify the previously approved planned district for the Clear Spring Plantation subdivision (AKA The Highlands at Clear Spring).
This request meets the former RP-1 (Planned Residential) zone requirements, the previously approved development plan, and the criteria for approval of a special use for modifications to previously approved planned districts per Article 1.4.G.
Disposition Summary
Approve the Special Use to modify the previously approved planned district for the Clear Spring Plantation subdivision (AKA The Highlands at Clear Spring).

What's next?

− +
After the Planning Commission
Planning Commission decisions on Special Use (SU) cases are final unless appealed.

SU cases do not move forward to City Council unless the request is to remove a planned district designation from the zoning map.

Applicant

Highlands at Clear Springs

W. Scott Williams & Associates

Planning Staff
Mike Reynolds
Phone: 865-215-3827
Email: mike.reynolds@knoxplanning.org
Submit CommentsRequest to Speak

Case History