Design Review Board
Edgewood Park Infill Housing Overlay District
2-A-20-IH
Location
1731 Nickerson Ave. 37917
Owner
Daniel Daniel Orr
Applicant Request
Additions visible from the primary street; Changes to porches visible from the primary streetStaff recommendation is to deny the request.
1. The proposed front porch addition is not in compliance with three of the criteria suggested for additions:
a. Exterior covering…should be selected that are like those original to the house (p. 14).
b. Additions should be made to the rear or side of the house…(p.14).
c. The open appearance of front porches should be maintained; if porches are to be enclosed, glass should be used…(p. 14)
2. The Guidelines give an option for front porch enclosure, utilizing glass in lieu of opaque building materials for the enclosure (p. 14).
3. Repair and maintenance (in-kind) are allowed without the Committee's approval, so the applicant could repair the roof and maintain the original front façade. Needed storage space could be added to the rear façade.
4. Proposed porch enclosure and corbels would change the house from a variation of a Craftsman to a Folk Victorian.
5. The majority of the houses are of no significant architectural style, so while the proposal does not meet the Infill Housing Design Guidelines, it is not out of character for the neighborhood.
1. The proposed front porch addition is not in compliance with three of the criteria suggested for additions:
a. Exterior covering…should be selected that are like those original to the house (p. 14).
b. Additions should be made to the rear or side of the house…(p.14).
c. The open appearance of front porches should be maintained; if porches are to be enclosed, glass should be used…(p. 14)
2. The Guidelines give an option for front porch enclosure, utilizing glass in lieu of opaque building materials for the enclosure (p. 14).
3. Repair and maintenance (in-kind) are allowed without the Committee's approval, so the applicant could repair the roof and maintain the original front façade. Needed storage space could be added to the rear façade.
4. Proposed porch enclosure and corbels would change the house from a variation of a Craftsman to a Folk Victorian.
5. The majority of the houses are of no significant architectural style, so while the proposal does not meet the Infill Housing Design Guidelines, it is not out of character for the neighborhood.
Staff Comments
1. The applicant was unaware that he needed a building permit to enclose a portion of his front porch and began work without a permit. The applicant has since ceased construction and applied for a Certificate of Occupancy.
2. Due to roof and ceiling damage, the applicant was working on this portion of the house and started the porch enclosure as part of that process while making the needed repairs.
3. The proposal is to enclose the right side of the front porch to add storage. The addition would measure 12-ft wide at the front of the house, extending from the front right corner in towards the center. It would be 8-ft deep at the side of the house.
4. The addition would also add a front gable roof with an 8:12 slope of gray shingles to match the existing house. Three corbels beneath the front gable would provide a decorative element.
5. The front window would match the existing one-over-one pane pattern. The front door and front left window remain as that part of the porch would not be altered.
6. The existing house is reminiscent of the craftsman style, with a symmetrical façade, a low-pitched shed roof over the front porch, and a side gable roof over the primary part of the structure.
2. Due to roof and ceiling damage, the applicant was working on this portion of the house and started the porch enclosure as part of that process while making the needed repairs.
3. The proposal is to enclose the right side of the front porch to add storage. The addition would measure 12-ft wide at the front of the house, extending from the front right corner in towards the center. It would be 8-ft deep at the side of the house.
4. The addition would also add a front gable roof with an 8:12 slope of gray shingles to match the existing house. Three corbels beneath the front gable would provide a decorative element.
5. The front window would match the existing one-over-one pane pattern. The front door and front left window remain as that part of the porch would not be altered.
6. The existing house is reminiscent of the craftsman style, with a symmetrical façade, a low-pitched shed roof over the front porch, and a side gable roof over the primary part of the structure.
Applicant
Planning Staff
Email: michelle.portier@knoxplanning.org
Daniel Daniel Orr
Planning Staff
Michelle Portier
Phone: 865-215-3821Email: michelle.portier@knoxplanning.org
Case History
- December 11, 2006
- January 24, 2007
- June 28, 2007
- October 29, 2007
- October 31, 2007
- November 5, 2007
- November 13, 2007
- November 26, 2007
- November 28, 2007
- December 11, 2007
- December 17, 2007
- January 23, 2008
- February 19, 2008
- February 29, 2008
- May 28, 2008
- June 16, 2008
- August 8, 2008
- November 27, 2008
- December 12, 2008
- January 21, 2009
- January 27, 2009
- May 27, 2009
- June 16, 2009
- July 22, 2009
- August 17, 2009
- October 15, 2009
- October 28, 2009
- November 25, 2009
- November 30, 2009
- December 23, 2009
- January 28, 2010
- February 24, 2010
- July 28, 2010
- October 27, 2010
- February 23, 2011
- June 9, 2011
- July 27, 2011
- August 30, 2011
- October 26, 2011
- December 8, 2011
- December 21, 2011
- January 25, 2012
- March 20, 2012
- May 23, 2012
- August 17, 2012
- August 22, 2012
- October 24, 2012
- November 28, 2012
- December 3, 2012
- January 23, 2013
- February 1, 2013
- February 27, 2013
- August 28, 2013
- October 23, 2013
- November 27, 2013
- December 9, 2013
- December 18, 2013
- January 22, 2014
- February 26, 2014
- May 29, 2014
- November 19, 2014
- December 17, 2014
- January 30, 2015
- March 4, 2015
- August 19, 2015
- December 16, 2015
- January 27, 2016
- February 24, 2016
- August 24, 2016
- October 26, 2016
- November 16, 2016
- December 21, 2016
- February 22, 2017
- October 5, 2017
- November 2, 2017
- December 7, 2017
- January 4, 2018
- February 1, 2018
- August 2, 2018
- October 4, 2018
- December 6, 2018
- January 3, 2019
- March 7, 2019
- August 1, 2019
- October 3, 2019
- November 7, 2019
- February 6, 2020
- March 5, 2020
- October 21, 2020
- November 18, 2020
- December 16, 2020
- January 20, 2021
- February 17, 2021
- March 17, 2021
- October 20, 2021
- November 17, 2021
- December 15, 2021
- January 19, 2022
- March 16, 2022
- May 18, 2022
- July 20, 2022
- August 17, 2022
- September 26, 2022
- October 19, 2022
- November 16, 2022
- December 21, 2022
- February 15, 2023
- April 14, 2023
- October 18, 2023
- November 15, 2023
- December 1, 2023
- December 20, 2023
- January 4, 2024
- February 21, 2024
- April 15, 2024
- May 23, 2024
- June 20, 2024
- October 2, 2024
- October 16, 2024
- November 20, 2024
- November 21, 2024
- December 16, 2024
- December 18, 2024
- January 3, 2025
- January 15, 2025
- February 19, 2025
- March 19, 2025
To be heard