Rezoning

4-L-22-RZ

Approved with conditions
by the Planning Commission

Approve PR (Planned Residential) zoning up to 18 du/ac because it is adjacent to a large commercial node served by transit subject to the following 4 conditions.


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
0 W. Governor John Sevier Hwy.

South side of W. Governor John Sevier Highway, southwest of Chapman Highway, southeast of intersection of Abner Cruze Road

Commission District 9


Size
15.50 acres

Sector
South County

Land Use Designation? GC (General Commercial)


Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
Approve PR (Planned Residential) zoning up to 18 du/ac because it is adjacent to a large commercial node served by transit subject to the following 4 conditions:
1) Maintain a tree buffer with 50-ft of depth along the Governor John Sevier Highway frontage, except for allowing approved access to Governor John Sevier Highway, as recommended by the Governor John Sevier Scenic Highway Corridor Study. High visibility tree protection fencing shall be installed before clearing and grading activities begin and maintained until site and building construction are complete.
2) No clearing or grading of the site shall be permitted until a Concept Plan or Use on Review development plan is approved by the Planning Commission.
3) Provide a vegetated buffer consisting of a "Type B" landscape screen of 20-ft in depth adjacent to the RA and A zoned parcels on the south side of the property.
4) Provide a pedestrian connection to the large adjacent commercial node to the east that is served by transit.
Disposition Summary
Approve PR (Planned Residential) zoning up to 18 du/ac because it is adjacent to a large commercial node served by transit subject to the following 4 conditions.

What's next?

+
After the Planning Commission
This Rezoning case in the County was recommended for approval. The appeal deadline - May 14, 2022 has passed.
Applicant

Taylor D. Forrester


Case History