Subdivision

Final Plat

5-SI-26-F

Approved

Approve the variance from Section 3.03.E of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to be created without requiring the existing Joint Permanent Easement to be subject to the applicable requirements of Section 3.03.D of the Subdivision Regulations based on the following evidence of hardship. 1. The existing Joint Permanent Easement is owned and maintained by ASARCO. ASARCO's assets have been sold and transferred multiple times and it has undergone bankruptcy, making it unclear who is responsible for maintaining the current easement.
2. The property owner did not create the Joint Permanent Easement and does not have the legal right to improve it to meet the current subdivision regulation standards.
3. The Joint Permanent Easement and the two homes are pre-existing and the variance allows the homes to be on separate lots so they can be sold independently of each other. The traffic is established resulting in no additional impact to health and safety.

Approve the variance from Section 3.03.G of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to use the existing Joint Permanent Easement without updating the legal documentation based on the following evidence of hardship.

1. The property is served by a Joint Permanent Easement created by ASARCO in 1987. ASARCO has undergone several reorganizations, sales, and bankruptcies but the ownership information for the easement has not changed. There is no ability to obtain an updated easement agreement.
2. The property owner did not create the easement ownership issue and the resulting impossibility of obtaining an updated easement agreement by ASARCO.
3. The Joint Permanent Easement and the two homes are pre-existing and the variance allows the homes to be on separate lots so they can be sold independently of each other. The traffic is established resulting in no additional impact to health and safety.

Approve the final plat for 2 lots in the A district.


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+
Subdivision
Final Plat of Beverly Turner & Cathy L Bentley Property
Lots
2 (Split)
Residential?
Yes - SF

Variances

1. Variance from Section 3.03.E of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to be created without requiring the existing Joint Permanent Easement to be subject to the applicable requirements of Section 3.03.D of the Subdivision Regulations.

2. Variance from Section 3.03.G of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to use the existing Joint Permanent Easement without updating the legal documentation.


Property Information

+
Location
1920 WHIRLWIND WAY

East side of Whirlwind Way, south of Mascot Rd

Commission District 8


Size
5.01 acres

Place Type Designation
RL (Rural Living)

Currently on the Property
Rural Residential

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Fire Department / District
Rural Metro Fire

Case Notes

+
Disposition Summary
Approve the variance from Section 3.03.E of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to be created without requiring the existing Joint Permanent Easement to be subject to the applicable requirements of Section 3.03.D of the Subdivision Regulations based on the following evidence of hardship. 1. The existing Joint Permanent Easement is owned and maintained by ASARCO. ASARCO's assets have been sold and transferred multiple times and it has undergone bankruptcy, making it unclear who is responsible for maintaining the current easement.
2. The property owner did not create the Joint Permanent Easement and does not have the legal right to improve it to meet the current subdivision regulation standards.
3. The Joint Permanent Easement and the two homes are pre-existing and the variance allows the homes to be on separate lots so they can be sold independently of each other. The traffic is established resulting in no additional impact to health and safety.

Approve the variance from Section 3.03.G of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to use the existing Joint Permanent Easement without updating the legal documentation based on the following evidence of hardship.

1. The property is served by a Joint Permanent Easement created by ASARCO in 1987. ASARCO has undergone several reorganizations, sales, and bankruptcies but the ownership information for the easement has not changed. There is no ability to obtain an updated easement agreement.
2. The property owner did not create the easement ownership issue and the resulting impossibility of obtaining an updated easement agreement by ASARCO.
3. The Joint Permanent Easement and the two homes are pre-existing and the variance allows the homes to be on separate lots so they can be sold independently of each other. The traffic is established resulting in no additional impact to health and safety.

Approve the final plat for 2 lots in the A district.

Staff Recommendation
Approve the variance from Section 3.03.E of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to be created without requiring the existing Joint Permanent Easement to be subject to the applicable requirements of Section 3.03.D of the Subdivision Regulations based on the following evidence of hardship.
1. The existing Joint Permanent Easement is owned and maintained by ASARCO. ASARCO's assets have been sold and transferred multiple times and it has undergone bankruptcy, making it unclear who is responsible for maintaining the current easement.
2. The property owner did not create the Joint Permanent Easement and does not have the legal right to improve it to meet the current subdivision regulation standards.
3. The Joint Permanent Easement and the two homes are pre-existing and the variance allows the homes to be on separate lots so they can be sold independently of each other. The traffic is established resulting in no additional impact to health and safety.

Approve the variance from Section 3.03.G of the Subdivision Regulations to allow an additional lot to use the existing Joint Permanent Easement without updating the legal documentation based on the following evidence of hardship.

1. The property is served by a Joint Permanent Easement created by ASARCO in 1987. ASARCO has undergone several reorganizations, sales, and bankruptcies but the ownership information for the easement has not changed. There is no ability to obtain an updated easement agreement.
2. The property owner did not create the easement ownership issue and the resulting impossibility of obtaining an updated easement agreement by ASARCO.
3. The Joint Permanent Easement and the two homes are pre-existing and the variance allows the homes to be on separate lots so they can be sold independently of each other. The traffic is established resulting in no additional impact to health and safety.

Approve the final plat for 2 lots in the A district.
There is an existing Joint Permanent Easement agreement recorded in Instrument 198710200027379 by ASARCO that was subsequently platted in Instrument 198710200051316. The property is located along the easement and has two houses as allowed by right in the A zone, and the proposed subdivision would allow each house to be on its own lot. Subdividing a property along the existing Joint Permanent Easement per the requirements of Sections 3.03.E and 3.03.G is not possible due to ASARCO undergoing several sales of assets and bankruptcies resulting in an inability for the property owner to obtain an updated easement agreement.

VARIANCE FROM SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, ARTICLE 3.03, PREVIOUSLY APPROVED JOINT PERMANENT EASEMENT, SUBSECTION E:
A subdivision may be considered that would create additional lots on a previously approved joint permanent easement, or create additional lots that would require the extension of a previously approved joint permanent easement. Such subdivision of land shall be subject to the applicable requirements of Section 3.03.D.

In this case, improving the Joint Permanent Easement to Private Right-of-Way Standards required by Section 3.03.D is not possible due to the property owner not having the legal right to improve an easement they do not own.

VARIANCE FROM SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, ARTICLE 3.03, LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, SUBSECTION G:
Where access to a lot is provided by a proposed easement, private right-of-way or other approved means of access in lieu of direct frontage on a public street, such approved access shall be shown on the subdivision plat along with all engineering data, or reference to recorded documents, necessary to locate the approved access on the ground. The deed or other legal document establishing the easement, private right-of way, or other approved means of access, must be approved by the appropriate law department, city or county, as to legality and permanence of access rights, and a written statement of the law department's approval must be submitted prior to certification for recording. The document must also address property ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the approved access. Reference to such deed or other legal document shall also be shown on the plat.

If a new lot(s) is added to an existing easement, the easement agreement shall be updated to include the new property owners and establish updated maintenance responsibilities. This documentation must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate law department, as provided above.

In this case, there is no ability to contact ASARCO due to reorganizations, sales, and bankruptcies making it impossible for the property owner to obtain updated legal documentation for the additional lot on the Joint Permanent Easement.

What's next?

+
Because of its location in the COUNTY, appeals will be heard by Court of Competent Jurisdiction.
Final Plat appeals will be heard by the Planning Commission.
Appeals of Concept Plans and Final Plats are filed with Chancery CourtThe Process
Applicant

Final Plat of Beverly Turner & Cathy L Bentley Property

Cathy Bentley


Case History