Use On Review

6-BB-01-UR

Approved
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the plan for a duplex on this lot subject to 9 conditions


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Health Dept.
2. Provision of a street name consistent with the Uniform Street Naming and Addressing System within Knox County (Ord. 91-1-102).
3. Provision of a "Class B" landscape screen along the full width of the rear of this lot adjoining Concord Woods Subdivision (see attached).
4. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works.
5. Access being provided to this site via the joint driveway as shown on the development plan.
6. Meeting all requirements of the approved Concept Plan (6-SL-01-C).
7. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.
8. Provision of a minimum of 12,000 sq. feet of lot area,
9. A geotechnical report stating the depression on this lot is not a sinkhole and any lost stormwater storage is replaced on the site.

With the conditions noted this plan meets the requirements for approval in the RA Zone and the other criteria




Sentinel Builders
6-BB-01-UR
Page 2


for approval of a Use on Review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
East side of Loop Rd., east of Olive Rd.

Commission District 5


Size
16,012 square feet

Sector
Southwest County

Currently on the Property
Vacant

Growth Plan
Urban Growth Area - Farragut

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the plan for a duplex on this lot subject to 9 conditions
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Health Dept.
2. Provision of a street name consistent with the Uniform Street Naming and Addressing System within Knox County (Ord. 91-1-102).
3. Provision of a "Class B" landscape screen along the full width of the rear of this lot adjoining Concord Woods Subdivision (see attached).
4. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works.
5. Access being provided to this site via the joint driveway as shown on the development plan.
6. Meeting all requirements of the approved Concept Plan (6-SL-01-C).
7. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.
8. Provision of a minimum of 12,000 sq. feet of lot area,
9. A geotechnical report stating the depression on this lot is not a sinkhole and any lost stormwater storage is replaced on the site.

With the conditions noted this plan meets the requirements for approval in the RA Zone and the other criteria




Sentinel Builders
6-BB-01-UR
Page 2


for approval of a Use on Review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the plan for a duplex on this lot subject to 9 conditions
Details of Action
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Health Dept.
2. Provision of a street name consistent with the Uniform Street Naming and Addressing System within Knox County (Ord. 91-1-102).
3. Provision of a "Class B" landscape screen along the full width of the rear of this lot adjoining Concord Woods Subdivision (see attached).
4. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works.
5. Access being provided to this site via the joint driveway as shown on the development plan.
6. Meeting all requirements of the approved Concept Plan (6-SL-01-C).
7. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.
8. Provision of a minimum of 12,000 sq. feet of lot area,
9. A geotechnical report stating the depression on this lot is not a sinkhole and any lost stormwater storage is replaced on the site.

With the conditions noted this plan meets the requirements for approval in the RA Zone and the other criteria




Sentinel Builders
6-BB-01-UR
Page 2


for approval of a Use on Review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - July 14, 2001 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Sentinel Builders, Inc


Case History