Special Use
7-F-26-SU
Planning Staff Recommendation
Approve the request for a new accessory structure, driveway, and accessible parking space for a place of worship, subject to three conditions:
See case notes below
Request
Property Info
Case Notes
What's next?
Applicant Request
− +Zoning
- Current
RN-2, (C)
RN-2 (Single-Family Residential Neighborhood), (C) (Previously Approved Planned District)The RN-2 Single-Family Residential Neighborhood Zoning District is intended to accommodate low density single- family residential development on relatively small lots with smaller setbacks within the City of Knoxville. Two-family dwellings may also be allowed by special use approval. Limited nonresidential uses that are compatible with the character of the district may also be permitted.
Land Use
- Current
Public/Quasi Public Land (church)
ProposedAccessory structure (pavilion) for a place of worship
Property Information
− +421 NORTH WINSTON RD
West side of North Winston Rd, north side of I-40/I-75
Council District 2
Size
10.07 acres
Planning Sector
Northwest City
Land Use Classification CI (Civic and Institutional) CI (Civic and Institutional)
Public/Quasi Public Land (church)
Growth Plan
N/A (Within the City limits)
Fire Department / District
Knoxville Fire Department
- Utilities
- Sewer
Knoxville Utilities Board
WaterKnoxville Utilities Board
Case Notes
− +Disposition Summary
Approve the request for a new accessory structure, driveway, and accessible parking space for a place of worship, subject to three conditions:Staff Recommendation
Approve the request for a new accessory structure, driveway, and accessible parking space for a place of worship, subject to three conditions:1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the City of Knoxville Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, Article 12 (Landscape).
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the City of Knoxville Department of Plans Review and Inspections.
3. Meeting all applicable requirements of the City of Knoxville Department of Engineering.
This request is for a new pavilion, driveway, and accessible parking space at the existing West Hills Baptist Church.
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING A SPECIAL USE (ARTICLE 16.2.F.2)
1) THE USE IS CONSISTENT WITH ADOPTED PLANS AND POLICIES, INCLUDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ONE-YEAR PLAN.
A. The proposed pavilion and driveway are not expected to adversely impact any existing neighborhoods and communities, and the placement minimizes tree loss on the large forested lot, which is consistent with the General Plan's Development Policies 9.2 and 9.3.
B. The proposed use is consistent with the One Year Plan's and Northwest City Sector Plan's CI (Civic/Institutional) land use classification.
2) THE USE IS IN HARMONY WITH THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THIS ZONING CODE.
A. This property is zoned RN-1 (Single-Family Residential Neighborhood) with a (C) district designation in a band along the northern and western lot lines. Per the transition rules of Article 1.4.G, the old zoning regulations apply to future development on this property, so the RP-1 (Planned Residential) regulations apply to this request. The (C) district designation covers the section of the property where the pavilion is proposed though that zone and the previously approved plans are associated with the Saint Andrews single family subdivision to the north that was approved in 1994 (3-G-94-UR).
B. The proposed driveway extends towards the pavilion from the existing parking lot, and the pavilion is situated directly to the west of the church. This location minimizes tree loss, is set far back from the subdivision to the north, and maintains a large buffer from Jean Teague Greenway, which runs through the north of the property. This location for the expansion is consistent with the intent of the RP-1 district.
C. The proposal complies with the development standards for uses permitted on review, pertaining to churches in the RP-1 district under the prior zoning code. Although a pavilion was not listed among the specific permitted accessory structures for a church under the prior zoning code, the accessory use complies with the general provisions for accessory uses and the applicable height regulations.
3) THE USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE IT IS PROPOSED, AND WITH THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF BUILDINGS IN THE VICINITY.
A. The church is a well-established structure in this area and predates much of the surrounding development. It serves as a buffer from the I-40/I-75 traffic for the single family neighborhood to the north. The request will have a minimal impact on the area, since the changes occur on the southern side of the property closer to the interstate.
B. The pavilion will be visible from I-40, which abuts the property to the south, but it will not be visible from the street or other nearby developments. The design of the pavilion is compatible with that of the existing church building.
4) THE USE WILL NOT SIGNIFICANTLY INJURE THE VALUE OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OR BY NOISE, LIGHTS, FUMES, ODORS, VIBRATION, TRAFFIC, CONGESTION, OR OTHER IMPACTS DETRACT FROM THE IMMEDIATE ENVIRONMENT.
A. There are no anticipated negative impacts to surrounding properties from the proposed minor expansion of the church use on the 10-acre property.
B. The pavilion and driveway are placed near the south of the property and are separated from the neighborhood and Jean Teague Greenway to the north by acres of remaining forest.
5) THE USE IS NOT OF A NATURE OR SO LOCATED AS TO DRAW SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THROUGH RESIDENTIAL STREETS.
A. The subject property is accessed via North Winston Road, a major collector street, and traffic would not be routed through residential streets. The anticipated traffic impact of the proposed expansion is minimal.
6) THE NATURE OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA IS NOT SUCH AS TO POSE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO THE PROPOSED USE OR TO CREATE AN UNDESIRABLE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE PROPOSED USE.
A. There are no known uses or environmental factors immediately surrounding the subject property that would pose a potential hazard or have an undesirable impact on the proposed use.
What's next?
− +Planning Commission decisions on Special Use (SU) cases are final unless appealed.
SU cases do not move forward to City Council unless the request is to remove a planned district designation from the zoning map.
Rick Friel
Case History
- May 26, 2026
Date Filed
- July 9, 2026
Heard by the Planning Commission