Development Plan

8-E-25-DP

To be heard August 14, 2025Agenda Item No. 41

Planning Staff Recommendation

Approve the development plan for up to 9 single-family homes on individual lots and a reduction in peripheral setback from 35 ft to 25 ft, subject to 2 conditions.


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
0 BAYS MOUNTAIN RD

Corner of Kimberlin Heights Rd & Bays Mountain Rd

Commission District 9


Size
2.40 acres

Place Type Designation
RL (Rural Living)

Currently on the Property
Agriculture/Forestry/Vacant Land

Growth Plan
Rural Area

Fire Department / District
Seymour Volunteer Fire Department

Case Notes

+

Staff Recommendation
Approve the development plan for up to 9 single-family homes on individual lots and a reduction in peripheral setback from 35 ft to 25 ft, subject to 2 conditions.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County zoning ordinance.
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the criteria for approval of a development plan.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN ANALYSIS PER ARTICLE 6, SECTION 6.50.06 (APPROVAL OR DENIAL)
The Planning Commission shall determine, in the exercise of its administrative judgment, whether the proposed plan is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and adopted plans.

1) ZONING ORDINANCE - PR (Planned Residential) up to 3 du/ac:
A. The property is zoned PR (Planned Residential) with a density of up to 3 du/ac. The applicant is proposing to create 9 single family lots on 3.29 acres, which will bring the development density to 2.74 du/ac.
B. The PR zone allows single family houses as a permitted use. The administrative procedures for the PR zone require the Planning Commission to approve the development plan before permits can be issued (Knox County Zoning Ordinance Article 5, Section 5.13.15).
C. The applicant is requesting a reduction to the peripheral setback from 35 ft to 25 ft along all boundary lines. The Planning Commission can reduce the 35-ft peripheral setback to 15 ft when the subject property abuts the A zone, which this property does. There is a blue line stream constraining the property on the western boundary, which further supports the requested reduction.

2) KNOX COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - FUTURE LAND USE MAP
A. The property's place type is RL (Rural Living) on the Future Land Use Map. The Rural Living area is made of primarily of single-family homes within a rural setting. The proposed development is consistent with this place type.

3) KNOX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES
A. This development is consistent with Implementation Policy 2, which ensures that development is sensitive to existing community character. The development is adjacent to single family subdivisions on small lots to the west and east.

4) KNOXVILLE - FARRAGUT - KNOX COUNTY GROWTH POLICY PLAN
A. The property is within the Rural Area of the Growth Policy Plan and was zoned PR (Planned Residential) with a density of up to 3 du/ac in 2020. Section 4.1 states that The Knox County Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map shall determine land uses permitted in the Rural Area, and that the rural designation shall not impede the right of a property owner to use or develop the property for a purpose permitted by that property's zoning. Section 4.3 states that, as of the effective date of the plan, all previously approved densities in the Rural Area shall remain in effect and are subject to all plans, regulations, and/or conditions of their approval.

What's next?

+
Planning Commission decisions on Development Plans (DP) are final unless appealed.

Appeals can be filed with the Knox County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 days of the Planning Commission's decision (Knox County, Tennessee Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Zoning, 6.50.08).

Applicant

Camp Fox S/D

W. Scott Williams & Associates


Case History