Plan Amendment

Central City Sector Plan Amendment

1-A-10-SP

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

Mixed Uses (MU) (O, LI, MDR) and MU (C, O LI, MDR) as depicted on the attached MPC recommendation map


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
3605 Middlebrook Pike

Northeast side Middlebrook Pike, east side Keith Ave.

Council District 3
Census Tract 27


Size
6,854 square feet

Sector
Central City

Land Use Designation? Light Industrial


Currently on the Property
Commercial building

Growth Plan
Urban Growth Area (Inside City Limits)

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
ADOPT RESOLUTION #1-A-10-SP, amending the Central City Sector Plan to MU (Mixed Uses) (as depicted on the attached MPC staff recommendation map) and recommend that City Council also adopt the sector plan amendment. (See attached resolution, Exhibit A.)
Commercial is a logical extension of the sector plan designation from the north and west. Commercial use of this site is compatible with surrounding development and zoning. The One Year Plan calls for GC (General Commercial) uses for the site, consistent with the proposed C-3 zoning. But, the current sector plan does not call for commercial use of the site. Staff has recommended that the entire area of parcels 24 and 25 be redesignated to allow mixed uses. The area containing the subject property would allow consideration of commercial zoning. The recommended mixed use area would be limited to office, light industrial or medium density residential in the northern section, and limited to office, light industrial, medium density residential and commercial in the southern section along Middlebrook Pike.
Disposition Summary
Mixed Uses (MU) (O, LI, MDR) and MU (C, O LI, MDR) as depicted on the attached MPC recommendation map

What's next?

+
After the Planning Commission
This Plan Amendment case in the City was recommended for approval. The appeal deadline - January 29, 2010 has passed.
Applicant

This and That / MPC


Case History