Development Plan

Planning Commission

1-E-23-DP

Approved with conditions
by the Planning Commission

Approve the development plan for a residential subdivision with up to 86 detached dwellings on individual lots and reduction of the 35-ft peripheral setback to 25-ft for lots 8, 10, 22, 23, 63-69, and the Beeler Road frontage of lots 84-86, as shown on


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
0 BEELER RD

East and west side of Beeler Rd, south of Beeler Farms Ln

Commission District 8


Size
27.53 acres

Sector
Northeast County

Land Use Designation? LDR (Low Density Residential), HP (Hillside Protection), SP (Stream Protection)


Currently on the Property
Agriculture/Forestry/Vacant Land

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
Approve the development plan for a residential subdivision with up to 86 detached dwellings on individual lots and reduction of the 35-ft peripheral setback to 25-ft for lots 8, 10, 22, 23, 63-69, and the Beeler Road frontage of lots 84-86, as shown on
1) Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR district and the criteria for approval of a development plan.
Disposition Summary
Approve the development plan for a residential subdivision with up to 86 detached dwellings on individual lots and reduction of the 35-ft peripheral setback to 25-ft for lots 8, 10, 22, 23, 63-69, and the Beeler Road frontage of lots 84-86, as shown on

What's next?

+
After the Planning Commission
Planning Commission decisions on Development Plans (DP) are final unless appealed.

Appeals can be filed with the Knox County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 days of the Planning Commission's decision (Knox County, Tennessee Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Zoning, 6.50.08).

Applicant

Mesana Investments - Beeler Road

Mesana Investments - Beeler Road


Case History