Use On Review

3-C-18-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 69 detached dwelling units on individual lots and the reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25' along the southern property line, subject to 1 condition.


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
2315 Goff Rd

Northeast side of Maryville Pike, north of Rudder Rd.

Commission District 9
Census Tract 56.04


Size
20.60 acres

Sector
South County

Land Use Designation? LDR, HP & STPA


Currently on the Property
Vacant land

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 69 detached dwelling units on individual lots and the reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25' along the southern property line, subject to 1 condition.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 69 detached dwelling units on individual lots and the reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25' along the southern property line, subject to 1 condition.
Details of Action
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - April 7, 2018 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Scott Davis


Case History