Use On Review

5-F-01-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the development plan for a 95 foot monopole telecommunications tower subject to 8 conditions


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Revising the landscape plan to move the landscape screen to the south side of the existing fence line located near the back of the property.
2. Installing proposed landscaping as shown on the revised landscape plan within six months of the tower becoming operational
3. Since the FAA does not require any lighting for this facility, there shall be no lighting on the tower.
4. Obtaining approval from the Knoxville Department of Development Inspection Bureau for placement of the support equipment within the adjoining storage building.
5. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Zoning Ordinance.
6 Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Department of Engineering and Public Works.
7. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville City Arborist.
8. A revised site plan, reflecting the conditions of approval must be submitted to MPC staff prior to issuance of any building permits for the project.

With the conditions noted above, the development plan meets all requirements of a use on review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
8848 Kingston Pike

South side of Kingston Pike, east of Ebenezer Rd.

Council District 2


Size
2.19 acres

Sector
Southwest County

Land Use Designation? Commercial


Currently on the Property
Self-storage facility

Growth Plan
Urban Growth Area (Inside City Limits)

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the development plan for a 95 foot monopole telecommunications tower subject to 8 conditions.
1. Revising the landscape plan to move the landscape screen to the south side of the existing fence line located near the back of the property.
2. Installing proposed landscaping as shown on the revised landscape plan within six months of the tower becoming operational
3. Since the FAA does not require any lighting for this facility, there shall be no lighting on the tower.
4. Obtaining approval from the Knoxville Department of Development Inspection Bureau for placement of the support equipment within the adjoining storage building.
5. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Zoning Ordinance.
6 Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Department of Engineering and Public Works.
7. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville City Arborist.
8. A revised site plan, reflecting the conditions of approval must be submitted to MPC staff prior to issuance of any building permits for the project.

With the conditions noted above, the development plan meets all requirements of a use on review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the development plan for a 95 foot monopole telecommunications tower subject to 8 conditions
Details of Action
1. Revising the landscape plan to move the landscape screen to the south side of the existing fence line located near the back of the property.
2. Installing proposed landscaping as shown on the revised landscape plan within six months of the tower becoming operational
3. Since the FAA does not require any lighting for this facility, there shall be no lighting on the tower.
4. Obtaining approval from the Knoxville Department of Development Inspection Bureau for placement of the support equipment within the adjoining storage building.
5. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Zoning Ordinance.
6 Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Department of Engineering and Public Works.
7. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville City Arborist.
8. A revised site plan, reflecting the conditions of approval must be submitted to MPC staff prior to issuance of any building permits for the project.

With the conditions noted above, the development plan meets all requirements of a use on review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - May 25, 2001 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

SprintCom, Inc.


Case History