Use On Review

7-C-13-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the development plan for a museum and non-profit preservation organization office, subject to 4 conditions


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
3425 Kingston Pike

Northwest side of Kingston Pike, northeast of Cherokee Blvd.

Council District 2
Census Tract 26


Size
4.54 acres

Sector
Central City

Land Use Designation? LDR


Currently on the Property
Residences

Growth Plan
Urban Growth Area (Inside City Limits)

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the development plan for a museum and non-profit preservation organization office, subject to 4 conditions
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knoxville Zoning Ordinance.
2. Obtaining approval from the Knoxville Board of Zoning Appeals for the parking variance.
3. Recording the access and parking agreement between the Laurel Church of Christ and Knox Heritage which will include the changes outlined in the attached letter from the Laurel Church of Christ dated July 30, 2013.
4. If the access and parking agreement between the Laurel Church of Christ and Knox Heritage is modified or revoked, Knox Heritage shall submit alternative plans for access and parking to the Planning Commission for review and approval. Until such time as the alternative plans are approved and implemented, use of the museum and offices may be restricted.

With the conditions noted above, this request meets all requirements for approval in the R-1 zoning district, as well as other criteria for approval of a use on review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the development plan for a museum and non-profit preservation organization office, subject to 4 conditions

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - August 23, 2013 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Knox Heritage, Inc.


Case History