Subdivision

Concept Plan

8-SA-22-C

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

Approve the requested variances and alternative design standards based on the justification provided by the applicant and the recommendations of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.

Approve the Concept Plan subject to 10 condit


See case notes below

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Applicant Request

+
Subdivision
8415 Ball Camp Pike
Lots
18 (Split)
Proposed Density
4.99
Residential?
Yes - MF

Variances

VARIANCES
1. Reduce the minimum intersection spacing from 300' to 124' between the intersection centerline of Road 'A' and the realignment of Ball Camp Pike and Byington Solway Road.
2. Reduce the minimum vertical curve on Road "A" from K=25 to K=15 at PVI STA 1+08.23.

ALTERNATIVE DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRING KNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL
1. Reduce the minimum private right-of-way width from 50' to 40'.
2. Reduce the minimum private right-of-way pavement width from 26' to 24'.

ALTERNATIVE DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRING KNOX COUNTY ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
1. Increase the maximum intersection grade from 1% to 2% at Road "A" and Byington Solway Road.


Property Information

+
Location
8415 BALL CAMP PIKE

North side of Ball Camp Pike, east of Byington Solway Road

Commission District 6


Size
3.61 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Land Use Designation? LDR (Low Density Residential)


Currently on the Property
Rural Residential

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
Approve the requested variances and alternative design standards based on the justification provided by the applicant and the recommendations of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.

Approve the Concept Plan subject to 10 condit

1) Connection to sanitary sewer and meeting other relevant utility provider requirements.
2) Provision of street names consistent with the Uniform Street Naming and Addressing System within Knox County (County Ord. 91-1-102).
3) Providing certification that the required sight distance can be obtained, with review and approval by Knox County Engineering and Public Works during the design plan phase. The sight distance must consider such things as guardrails and other visual impairments.
4) Road "A" must not impede water flow along the right-of-way or the County's permanent drainage easement for a culvert under the realigned Byington Solway Road.
5) Providing a right-turn out and full access in on Byington Solway Road. The design details will be determined during the design plan phase.
6) The right-of-way and curb radii at the Road "A" and Byington Solway Road intersection must not extend in front of the adjacent property to the west without the permission of that property owner.
7) Prior to certification of the plat for the first phase of this subdivision, the acreage of the PR (Planned Residential) zoning for this development must be verified. The maximum number of residential lots must not exceed the maximum allowed by the PR up to 5 du/ac zoning. If the acreage of the subdivision is less than 3.6 acres, lots must be eliminated to comply with the PR zoning.
8) Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.
9) Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.
10) Prior to certification of the final plat for the subdivision, establish a property owners association responsible for the maintenance of the common areas, amenities, and drainage system.
Disposition Summary
Approve the requested variances and alternative design standards based on the justification provided by the applicant and the recommendations of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.

Approve the Concept Plan subject to 10 condit

What's next?

+
After the Planning Commission
Because of its location in the County, appeals will be heard by Knox County Chancery Court.
Appeals of Concept Plans and Final Plats are filed with Chancery CourtThe Process
Applicant

8415 Ball Camp Pike

Mesana Investments, LLC


Case History