Use On Review

9-S-02-UR

Recommended for denial
by the Planning Commission

DENY the request for a 207 unit apartment complex at this location in the PR zoning District because it does not comply with the Use-on-Review development standards (Article 4, Sec 2 of the Knox Co.Zoning Ord.) SEE 9-S-02-UR-REV for final MPC action 4/1


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
DENY the request for a 207 unit apartment complex at this location in the PR (Planned Residential) Zoning District based on Staff's recommendation.

Staff recommended denial because the request does not comply with the Use-on-Review development standards (Article 4, Section 2 of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance)

The key issues on which the recommendation of denial is based include:

1. The proposed 10 unit per acre development is not consistent with the Southwest County Sector Plan's low density residential designation (up to 5 du/ac).
2. The multi-family development is not compatible with the established low density single-family neighborhoods that surround the property on three sides due to the intensity, scale and type of units proposed.
3. A 200% increase in traffic that would be directed through the single-family subdivision to the north.
4. The project's design has little consideration for pedestrian access throughout the development.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
0 George Williams Rd

Northwest side George Williams Rd., east and west sides of Confederate Dr.

Commission District 5


Size
20.69 acres

Sector
Southwest County

Land Use Designation? Low Density Residential


Currently on the Property
Vacant land

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
DENY the request for a 207 unit apartment complex at this location in the PR (Planned Residential) Zoning District because it does not comply with the Use-on-Review development standards (Article 4, Section 2 of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance)
The key issues on which Staff's recommendation of denial is based include:

1. The proposed 10 unit per acre development is not consistent with the Southwest County Sector Plan's low density residential designation (up to 5 du/ac).
2. The multi-family development is not compatible with the established low density single-family neighborhoods that surround the property on three sides due to the intensity, scale and type of units proposed.
3. A 200% increase in traffic that would be directed through the single-family subdivision to the north.
4. The project's design has little consideration for pedestrian access throughout the development.

IMPORTANT NOTE:
(This case was sent to BZA and BZA sent back MPC. See 9-S-02-UR-REV for final MPC Recommendation.)
Disposition Summary
DENY the request for a 207 unit apartment complex at this location in the PR zoning District because it does not comply with the Use-on-Review development standards (Article 4, Sec 2 of the Knox Co.Zoning Ord.) SEE 9-S-02-UR-REV for final MPC action 4/1
Details of Action
DENY the request for a 207 unit apartment complex at this location in the PR (Planned Residential) Zoning District based on Staff's recommendation.

Staff recommended denial because the request does not comply with the Use-on-Review development standards (Article 4, Section 2 of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance)

The key issues on which the recommendation of denial is based include:

1. The proposed 10 unit per acre development is not consistent with the Southwest County Sector Plan's low density residential designation (up to 5 du/ac).
2. The multi-family development is not compatible with the established low density single-family neighborhoods that surround the property on three sides due to the intensity, scale and type of units proposed.
3. A 200% increase in traffic that would be directed through the single-family subdivision to the north.
4. The project's design has little consideration for pedestrian access throughout the development.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.
After the Planning Commission
Because of its location in the County, appeals will be heard by .
December 18, 2002
Appeal by: November 9, 2002

The appeal deadline - November 9, 2002 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

The Williams Company


Case History