Public Comments

February 18, 2021
at 12:05 PM

Courtney
37806

3-SB-21-C
Courtney (37806), February 18, 2021 at 12:05 PM

Hello my name is Courtney Key and I live in Mascot, Tennessee. Originally from the Powell area which is closer to the city of Knoxville I could not wait to move out here and experience what living in the country was like. I know that I don’t live in straw plains but I am still apart of this community and this particular area wanting to build a mega subdivision is very close to my home. Since I live so close I travel this area quite often. My husband and I love our community because of the slower paced, quiet and rural lifestyle. You can’t experience these things living closer to Knoxville which is why we moved out here. I fear for the day this area becomes too built up and brings with it a ton of traffic killing our way of life out here. Bringing in all this new traffic would really take away from the peaceful, quiet slow paced lifestyle that we all know and love out here. Not only that but the massive size of this project takes away from the beautiful land. I hope you will consider how the massive size of this project would affect the life of this community and the reason everyone loves living out here. Lastly please consider making this a smaller project, thank you.

February 18, 2021
at 3:40 PM

Evangelynn
37924

3-SB-21-C
Evangelynn (37924), February 18, 2021 at 3:40 PM

I am very concerned about this proposed development, particularly the potential impacts to the neighborhood streets and traffic and the area utility services (water and sewer). I believe the density of this planned development is inappropriate for the surrounding area, and the fact that the entry points are both on Ruggles Ferry is a huge drawback. Traffic on this road is already a concern and this will worsen that situation. Water and sewer services are sometimes a problem in this area and I am concerned this many lots will overburden the system. Finally, I don't want to see my property values decrease due to the issues created by this subdivision. This is very unfair to the other property owners in the neighborhood.

February 19, 2021
at 9:51 AM

Sarah
37871

3-SB-21-C
Sarah (37871), February 19, 2021 at 9:51 AM

The massive size of this subdivision is absolutely ridiculous for this area. Ruggles Ferry Road cannot support this much daily traffic. Most people have lived on this road their whole lives and have seen the traffic increase in the past few years and no one living on this road wants to see this increase dramatically. This is a rural area and while growth is welcomed, 482 houses is not needed/wanted for this community. Please consider downsizing the number of homes. You can profit just as much from nicer homes on larger lots.

February 19, 2021
at 10:16 AM

Carl
37924

3-SB-21-C
Carl (37924), February 19, 2021 at 10:16 AM

Attached is my letter opposing concept plan 3-SB-21-C. Thank you.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210219101600.pdf

February 22, 2021
at 10:30 AM

Becca
37871

3-SB-21-C
Becca (37871), February 22, 2021 at 10:30 AM

My house is directly across from the entrance to this MEGA-subdivision. This would create non-stop traffic on Ruggles Ferry and the connecting roads can not handle this traffic. The concept of this many houses does not fit with the current setting of this area.

February 22, 2021
at 12:45 PM

David
37924

3-SB-21-C
David (37924), February 22, 2021 at 12:45 PM

I oppose this high intensity project due to the negative environmental impact it will have on the Holston River Basin area of the proposed site. Has the Environmental Impact Study been completed?

February 22, 2021
at 5:43 PM

Derek
37924

3-SB-21-C
Derek (37924), February 22, 2021 at 5:43 PM

Please see my attached letter regarding the above noted planned development. Thank you for your service and for your consideration of our concerns.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210222174334.pdf

February 22, 2021
at 9:09 PM

Kevin
37871

3-SB-21-C
Kevin (37871), February 22, 2021 at 9:09 PM

I own and live on 12.5 acres adjoining this proposed dense subdivision. While I am not opposed to a subdivision that fits into the surrounding area, I am opposed to a subdivision that has almost 3 homes per acre. Most of the homes in this area are on 2 acres or more. One of the main reasons we moved from West Knoxville to this location 20 years ago is because it is more rural and has a country feel. A subdivision with this density would definitely take away from the attractiveness of this area. This proposed subdivision would not only dramatically increase traffic on Ruggles Ferry Road but would also decrease property values in the area.

February 25, 2021
at 7:57 AM

Peggy
37871

3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), February 25, 2021 at 7:57 AM

My family opposes this development. We moved here because of the rural nature of this community. North Ruggles Ferry Pike can not accommodate traffic from a subdivision of this magnitude. Please DO NOT approve this!

February 27, 2021
at 8:55 AM

Kathy and Kraig
37871

3-SB-21-C
Kathy and Kraig (37871), February 27, 2021 at 8:55 AM

Please do not approve this development! As a family we live in East Knox County because of the quiet rural environment and the sense of belonging to a community that embraces nature, community and supports our farmers. We still have bald eagles flying in the skies and Otters, Beavers and Muskrates swimming in the Holsten River. The proposed development will have a significant impact on our environment, especially the Holsten River habitat. This development does not match the surrounding area, nor the intent of the community to maintain its rural heritage.

The size of this development will have a significant impact on the infrastructure in our community. The impact on the feeder roads especially Burris Road, Pleasant Hill and Ruggles Ferry will create a level of traffic that will have dangerous results and a negative impact on noise levels, congestion and overall safety on our small rural roads.

Development is inevitable, however we ask that the County Commission represent the residence who live here presently and that you consideration the uniqueness of each part of our County and approve developments that enhance the East County community, not destroy it's very essence of rural living.

Bobby and Abby
37871

3-SB-21-C
Bobby and Abby (37871), March 1, 2021 at 4:15 PM

I do not agree with this new development as I am very concerned about the increase in traffic due to having small children and disruption of country side view.

March 1, 2021
at 4:15 PM

March 1, 2021
at 10:25 PM

Andrea
37871

3-SB-21-C
Andrea (37871), March 1, 2021 at 10:25 PM

I added my comments as a PDF. This development really needs to be evaluated to the impact of the community around it.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210301222522.pdf

GREG
37924

3-SB-21-C
GREG (37924), March 2, 2021 at 8:13 AM

I have property on Burris Road and Graves Road. I travel Ruggles Ferry back and forth with farm equipment. The traffic is already bad now at times and there has been numerous times of almost an accident due to high speed vehicles. We certainly DO NOT NEED ALL the traffic that this would bring it pose many problems. The Carter schools are crowded now , they would have trouble handling all the many children that this would be having. I AM OPPOSED TO THIS BEING PUT IN>

March 2, 2021
at 8:13 AM

March 2, 2021
at 10:01 AM

Constance
37924

3-SB-21-C
Constance (37924), March 2, 2021 at 10:01 AM

I disagree with the plan of building 400 new homes in an area that will need a lot of money to accommodate an increased number of people, traffic, and sewage. Unless their are plans comparable of increased road space on Ruffles Ferry Road, water and sewage accommodation and traffic needs it will would be Unadvisable to do so. There are many lower income families that live in this area that own property and houses. Increased taxes could make it impossible to keep their property and homes. Thank you for your time concerning this matter.

March 3, 2021
at 10:55 AM

Kenzie
37871

3-SB-21-C
Kenzie (37871), March 3, 2021 at 10:55 AM

see attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210303105556.pdf

Greg
37871

3-SB-21-C
Greg (37871), March 3, 2021 at 2:49 PM

Not a fan of this project, I live nearby- I already can not get some services like quality home internet (Bellsouth DSL) , the poor signal i get will now be divided between 482 other households which will cause the signal to be much worse per Bellsouth. Traffic on Ruggles Ferry which is a rural road will not be safe. Even worse are the connecting roads to get to Asheville Hwy such as Cash Rd, Pleasant Hill, and Wooddale Rd which are not even two lane roads and could not safely support this amount of traffic.

March 3, 2021
at 2:49 PM

Josh & Melissa
37924

3-SB-21-C
Josh & Melissa (37924), March 4, 2021 at 8:11 AM

Hello I am a home owner on Ruggles Ferry Pike and would like to voice my opposition to this new neighborhood. I agree with the concerns that I am sure you have heard about traffic on our small roads. While I oppose I understand growth is inevitable. My ask is that the lot size be a mandatory ½ acre (would love to have 1 acre lots!) and also would ask that since this will be a burden on the existing members of the community that the builders give us something we can all enjoy such as a community boat launch on the river and a playground/picnic area for residents to enjoy. Sidewalks throughout the neighborhood would be great as well to ensure the residents new and existing have a safe place to walk considering the additional traffic that will be added. Thank you in advance for your consideration and help with ensuring the betterment of the community.

March 4, 2021
at 8:11 AM

March 4, 2021
at 11:04 AM

Ritchie
37902

3-SB-21-C
Ritchie (37902), March 4, 2021 at 11:04 AM

I could not agree more with your email. While 1 acre lots would certainly be wonderful, the 1/2 acre size is still well below the density that would be allowed in that zone, so anything close to that would be a great compromise. I also agree with the amenities you have suggested, as this is a very nice existing neighborhood - arguably the highest end neighborhood in the entire 8th District.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210304110426.pdf

JUSTIN
37871

3-SB-21-C
JUSTIN (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:33 PM

See attached pdf
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210304153340.pdf

March 4, 2021
at 3:33 PM

Brad
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:37 PM

This project will be terrible for the community and will turn people off to our area. It does not fit what the people of Carter want and needs to be dropped.

March 4, 2021
at 3:37 PM

April
37871

3-SB-21-C
April (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:46 PM

The development of 482 lots on Ruggles Ferry Pike is not only going to be an eyesore for the area, but a logistical nightmare for the community. Traffic is already a problem early in the morning and later in the afternoons as people commute to school and work, and adding an additional 482 families is only going to make the experience worse. Additionally, Carter schools do not have the capacity to handle even half that amount of potential enrollees, and since Carter Elementary was recently renovated I can’t imagine it would be renovated once more to accommodate even more students any time soon. The homes currently on and around Ruggles Ferry are generally large, expensive family homes, and to add almost 500 lower-end homes will not only add the problems mentioned above, but will greatly impact the property value of any homes in this area. This is a project no one in the Carter community supports aside from those who are receiving the financial gain from it. It must be stopped to preserve our community.

March 4, 2021
at 3:46 PM

Sherry
37871

3-SB-21-C
Sherry (37871), March 4, 2021 at 3:55 PM

This plan has way too many houses. The roads can not handle this much traffic. Secondary roads are very narrow. I am very concerned about this development.

March 4, 2021
at 3:55 PM

Johnnie
37806

3-SB-21-C
Johnnie (37806), March 4, 2021 at 4:01 PM

482 new houses on Ruggles Ferry Rd would put way to much traffic on a already busy road. People built new houses in this community because of its scenic beauty and this housing development would destroy it. Please VOTE no on this request.

March 4, 2021
at 4:01 PM

Kylie
37871

3-SB-21-C
Kylie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:05 PM

I oppose the development of this high density development. Please consider a development plan that aligns to the current standards of the surrounding neighborhood.

March 4, 2021
at 4:05 PM

Whitney
37924

3-SB-21-C
Whitney (37924), March 4, 2021 at 4:06 PM

Please take the time on a lovely Sunday afternoon to walk, bike or drive around our relaxed, east Knox County neighborhood and enjoy our Holston River views towards House Mountain.

Please vote to reduce the houses to 1 per acre (or ideally 1 per 2 acres lol).

We would welcome 100 new neighbors but 482 is insane.

We do not want to become Turkey Creek East.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210304160627.pdf

March 4, 2021
at 4:06 PM

Donna
s Fer

3-SB-21-C
Donna (s Fer), March 4, 2021 at 4:16 PM

I am extremely opposed to this proposed development. With 482 homes it will add close to 1,000 cars to an already well traveled 2 lane Ruggles Ferry Pike. I can only go across the road to my mailbox at certain times due to the traffic already here. We moved here from Nashville and chose the area due to the rural atmosphere with sparse development. This may be the most densely populated development in Knox County which I feel is unacceptable for this area. Thank you

March 4, 2021
at 4:16 PM

Brandi
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brandi (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:22 PM

Ruggles Ferry cannot handle the traffic, the schools cannot handle that many more students. The beauty in Straw Plains is all the open land. Why does it have to be almost 500 homes stacked on top of each other, instead space them out and have and better quality built home especially in the area.

March 4, 2021
at 4:22 PM

Travis
37871

3-SB-21-C
Travis (37871), March 4, 2021 at 4:23 PM

I oppose the development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. This would be one of the largest and most dense developments in all of Knox County. Lessen the density.

March 4, 2021
at 4:23 PM

Ann Marie
37871

3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 5:36 PM

Please don’t allow this huge development to happen! There would be tremendous traffic congestion on our two lane rural road. I have lived on Graves Road for 50 of my 57 years and our community does not want such a huge development! How would the Carter schools even accommodate all of the potential children? All of the roads that feed into Asheville Highway are extremely narrow, so how would traffic be for those roads? Please, please let our community stay a small rural community!

March 4, 2021
at 5:36 PM

Jessie
37871

3-SB-21-C
Jessie (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:09 PM

I am writing for concern and opposing the large development in our rural area. You can drive down Ruggles Ferry almost any sunny day and see people walking, running, walking their dogs and riding bikes. Not only does a development this size and number of houses not match the rural area, but it is dangerous to our community with the increase of traffic for our pedestrians. A development with reasonable and respectful homes is considerable. The one in question is greedy and not appropriate for the area.

March 4, 2021
at 6:09 PM

Caroline
37871

3-SB-21-C
Caroline (37871), March 4, 2021 at 6:36 PM

I am opposed to the size and density of this development being nearly 3 homes per acre. I am concerned about the infrastructure needed to support a development of this size, as well as the impact that it will have on the school system, roads, environment, etc. I urge you to reconsider this development, or at the very least, to dramatically reduce the amount of homes reflected in the current plan.

March 4, 2021
at 6:36 PM

Steve
37709

3-SB-21-C
Steve (37709), March 4, 2021 at 6:51 PM

The number of vehicles this high density subdivision will bring to the immediate and surrounding areas is totally unacceptable. The infrastructure simply cannot handle it and widening of the current roads will have a bad effect on property values. In addition, the noise and light pollution this subdivision will bring will destroy the quietness of the area. Please vote against this construction of this subdivision.

March 4, 2021
at 6:51 PM

Anne
37871

3-SB-21-C
Anne (37871), March 4, 2021 at 7:08 PM

I have lived in this community for over 50 years. I have seen a lot of changes, some good, some not so good. While I am open to the concept of a subdivision being built in our area I am strongly opposed to the density of this proposal. I would like to see it reduced to a maximum of 1 house per acre or preferably 2 acres. We are a rural farming community. My house is 1.5 miles from the end of my driveway to the main entrance of the proposed subdivision. In this 1.5 miles there are 6 operating farms (and 2 on the other side of the entrance) that have slow moving farm equipment traveling all hours of the day and night. With the added growth in the last few years Ruggles Ferry has become a Nascar speedway. It has no shoulders or sidewalks and in some places steep drop offs that could cause serious injury if your wheel slipped off the edge of the road. It will be a disaster going to happen when an additional 800 to 1000 cars are added. Ruggles Ferry and the smaller side roads that carry traffic to Asheville Highway cannot handle this additional load.

This is a rural farming community and we would like for it to retain that atmosphere. We do not want it to become a West Knoxville. That is why we live HERE and not THERE.

March 4, 2021
at 7:08 PM

Ashley
37871

3-SB-21-C
Ashley (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM

This is going to negatively affect my community. The traffic, the beauty of the farm land will be destroyed by this. That is the main reason we live here. Our community will be destroyed. If this is something that goes through, The plan needs to be rethought. Take a look at the Hardin Valley community less houses bigger lots. Greenways, parks etc. This in someway should benefit the community if it goes in. We need a park for kids, an area families can gather, greenways for walking. That’s what this community needs.

March 5, 2021
at 7:03 AM

Scott
N/A

3-SB-21-C
Scott (N/A), March 5, 2021 at 7:59 AM

This project will be a disaster for our area. I oppose this completely. We already have enough trouble with the golfers racing down the road we don’t need another 1000 cars a day on this road.

March 5, 2021
at 7:59 AM

Betty
37871

3-SB-21-C
Betty (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:46 AM

I oppose the development of 482 lots on Ruggles Ferry RD

March 5, 2021
at 8:46 AM

Justin
37871

3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), March 5, 2021 at 8:53 AM

I’m against the construction plan to build 482 on Blake Lane.

March 5, 2021
at 8:53 AM

Brad
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 9:52 AM

I’m opposed to this project!

March 5, 2021
at 9:52 AM

March 5, 2021
at 10:09 AM

Becca
37871

3-SB-21-C
Becca (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:09 AM

Good morning. I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed development, "Innsbruck Farms" planned for N Ruggles Ferry Pike at Blake Road, case file number 3-SB-21-C. I live directly across from the proposed entrance into this subdivision. 482 houses, I feel, does not fit the current setting of this area. There is nothing in our community that dense. The closest subdivision that could even compare is Shannon Valley Farms with 2.1 DU/Acre with 91 units on 154.7 acres. Innsbruck Farms is proposing 482 units on 171.88 acres. This is so misplaced for our community. Also the roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to main highways can't not support the amount of traffic that 482 houses will add. Cash Road, Burris Road, Arms Road and Pleasant HIll Road are all connecting roads that now can't handle the traffic. None of these roads are lined and most aren't wide enough for 2 cars while passing.

I'm not against development in our community, but I feel like this development does not have the community at heart.

March 5, 2021
at 10:34 AM

Valerie
37871

3-SB-21-C
Valerie (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:34 AM

I am in opposition of the 485 house development being planned for Blake Lane. There is not adequate demand or infrastructure in that area for that many new homes. It should also be considered that less than a mile away Neals Landing is also being expanded to add hundreds of houses. Our current schools (especially Carter Elementary and Middle) do not have the space for students for a new build of this size. Those issues need to be addressed BEFORE a new subdivision of this size should even be considered. In addition, the land to house ratio of this proposed subdivision is WAY too low. If this passes I would hope it is at least for a lower number of houses on that amount of acreage to provide for a larger yard and maintain the standards set by the homes that have been built in that area in the last 20 years. And also requiring greenways and such like are being required in areas such as Hardin Valley will new subdivision development. The people of east Knox county deserve the same!

March 5, 2021
at 11:12 AM

Leslie
37924

3-SB-21-C
Leslie (37924), March 5, 2021 at 11:12 AM

This proposed subdivision would have terrible repercussions for the community. There would be too much traffic for the county roads affected to handle. Excessive speed on Ruggles Ferry Pk is already a problem and the added traffic would be a hazard. The schools in the community could also become overcrowded. A subdivision of this size should not be built in this area.

March 5, 2021
at 11:19 AM

Brent
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brent (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:19 AM

I oppose the development of 482 homes.

March 5, 2021
at 11:23 AM

Suzannah
37871

3-SB-21-C
Suzannah (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:23 AM

I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed development of 482 lots off Ruggles Ferry Pike. I am a home owner less than a mile from this development. I do not feel the current landscape of the community will support this number of homes, families or vehicles on Ruggles Ferry. I hope you will reconsider the desires of the community and reject this proposal.

March 5, 2021
at 11:26 AM

Pam
37871

3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), March 5, 2021 at 11:26 AM

Too many houses for this small area. Too much traffic for small roads

March 5, 2021
at 12:34 PM

Brittany
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brittany (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM

I think this is a terrible idea... It will crowed the Carter school community make the roads so busy

March 5, 2021
at 12:46 PM

Kristen
37721

3-SB-21-C
Kristen (37721), March 5, 2021 at 12:46 PM

This road cannot support this type of development nor can Carter Elem.

March 5, 2021
at 12:55 PM

Brad
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM

I am a member of the community and live less than a mile from the proposed site. I am writing to oppose the development. The landscape will not support the amount of homes projected on the development. Secondly, it will add an unacceptable and unsafe amount of traffic for Ruggles Ferry Pike and the surrounding roads. There are no roads in the area, other than Ruggles Ferry, to accommodate the amount of traffic the subdivision will bring. 428 homes times two cars (at least) each. That's close to 1000 vehicles on small country roads. I strongly support the denial of this development going forward and would hope the commission listens to the people it will effect the most. I urge the commission to vote against the development.

March 5, 2021
at 12:55 PM

Brad
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 12:55 PM

Whitney

3-SB-21-C
Whitney March 5, 2021 at 1:04 PM

I live off Ruggles Ferry Road and I am very troubled about nearly 500 houses being built in our neighborhood.

My immediate neighbors and I all own at least 5 acres of pristine east Tennessee land.

The houses closer to the proposed subdivision are beautiful, golf course homes with an acre or more between each on.

It's the type of neighborhood where kids feel safe, neighbors visit on porches and people feel safe walking along the road soaking up the sunshine and enjoying the fresh air.

We love land, trees, peace, quiet and space between ourselves to stretch out and breathe deep in east Knoxville.

If you drive along Ruggles Ferry Road, you'll notice beautiful family farms and road signs to watch out for tractors on the road.

We love the simple, uncomplicated, uncluttered and QUIET life out here.

482 homes would create a traffic nightmare on this little road and end our peaceful solitude along the Holston River.

It would end our country way of life with extra traffic and hoards of people buzzing around.

It would max out our local school's capacities to provide quality education for our kids.

The size and quality of houses within Innsbruck Farms would reduce our current property values.

This is a neighborhood where the newer homes built in the last 20 years are 4,000-5,000 square foot.

Innsbruck Farms homes would barely be what... ~ 1,200 square foot to fit 3 houses per acre.

Please take the time on a lovely Sunday afternoon to walk, bike or drive around our relaxed, east Knox County neighborhood and enjoy our Holston River views towards House Mountain.

And please vote to reduce the houses to 1 per acre (or ideally 1 per 2 acres lol).

We would welcome 100 new neighbors but 482 is insane.

We do not want to become Turkey Creek East.

March 5, 2021
at 1:04 PM

Chad
37871

3-SB-21-C
Chad (37871), March 5, 2021 at 1:10 PM

I oppose this development

March 5, 2021
at 1:10 PM

Ann Marie
N/A

3-SB-21-C
Ann Marie (N/A), March 5, 2021 at 1:21 PM

First of all, that you for taking your time to read my email. Please don’t allow this huge development to happen! There would be tremendous traffic congestion on our two lane rural road. I have lived on Graves Road for 50 of my 57 years and our community does not want such a huge development! How would the Carter schools even accommodate all of the potential children? All of the roads that feed into Asheville Highway are extremely narrow, so how would traffic be for those roads? Please, please let our community stay a small rural community!

March 5, 2021
at 1:21 PM

Whitney
N/A

3-SB-21-C
Whitney (N/A), March 5, 2021 at 1:24 PM

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210305132451.pdf

March 5, 2021
at 1:24 PM

travis
37871

3-SB-21-C
travis (37871), March 5, 2021 at 2:56 PM

Please see attached. Thank you
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210305145606.pdf

March 5, 2021
at 2:56 PM

Jody
37871

3-SB-21-C
Jody (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:27 PM

I am very concerned about the amount of traffic and the affect this project will have on our schools

March 5, 2021
at 7:27 PM

Justin
37914

3-SB-21-C
Justin (37914), March 5, 2021 at 7:28 PM

Knox County has set aside East Knoxville for the preservation of farmland and protection of wildlife. What is the EPA and TVA response to the impact of mass development to the natural resources of the area?

March 5, 2021
at 7:28 PM

Frances
37914

3-SB-21-C
Frances (37914), March 5, 2021 at 7:31 PM

Being a Realtor in the community I do need more homes to sell, but small lots are not what I hear customers are looking to purchase! The locals and all the out of town buyers that are moving to East Tennessee are asking me to find them homes on 1 acre++ I sold 14 homes in this neighborhood in 2020 and all were on 1 acre ++ There is a way to honor the community and the ancestors of this farm land community. Have you all considered an agrihood? What about a Liveonafarm agrihood community with a pavilion for a CSA Farmers Market and a community garden? The new model of living that is popping up across the country taps into the local food movement.

March 5, 2021
at 7:31 PM

Paul
37871

3-SB-21-C
Paul (37871), March 5, 2021 at 7:43 PM

Although not opposed to development, I believe this proposed project is completely inconsistent with the area. It should be approved at much less dense level.At least, please table this action until a later date to give more time for citizens review.

March 5, 2021
at 7:43 PM

Derek
37924

3-SB-21-C
Derek (37924), March 5, 2021 at 7:48 PM

I strongly oppose this development as presented. Its high density doesn’t fit our rural area and will create tremendous traffic and related safety issues. Rather than 1/4 to 1/3 acre lots with 482 houses, we would support 1/2 acre or larger lots with up to 150 or so houses. The present plan couldn’t be farther from the development recommended in the 2017 East Knox County Plan. Thanks you for your consideration.

March 5, 2021
at 7:48 PM

Deborah
37924

3-SB-21-C
Deborah (37924), March 5, 2021 at 8:09 PM

I strongly oppose the development as proposed. Adding that many homes will create major traffic and safety concerns. Ruggles Ferry is the only lined road. All of the other roads that will be traveled heavily are narrow, non-lined, windy roads with many blind curves and hills. Examples Burris, Cash, Pleasant Hill, etc. Thank you for hearing my concern.

March 5, 2021
at 8:09 PM

Allen
37871

3-SB-21-C
Allen (37871), March 5, 2021 at 9:34 PM

I oppose this massive build.

March 5, 2021
at 9:34 PM

Carl
37924

3-SB-21-C
Carl (37924), March 5, 2021 at 9:56 PM

We don't need this in our community. There will be to much traffic and waste of good farm land I farm and it's hard enough now to drive a tractor and transport hay equipment and with this it will be a heck of alot harder. The water line won't hold that much not the electric it will put to much of a load on things

March 5, 2021
at 9:56 PM

March 5, 2021
at 10:31 PM

Darrell
37871

3-SB-21-C
Darrell (37871), March 5, 2021 at 10:31 PM

As a resident of the community I believe the proposed development is to large. The road network surrounding the development is not designed to accommodate the amount of traffic 482 new units would generate.

Shirley
37871

3-SB-21-C
Shirley (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:12 AM

Dear Commissioners, Thank you for considering my concerns in the development known as,Innsbruck Farms. This 482 acre is one of the most dense proposals in the county. The traffic study indicates that more than 4,000 vehicles will will filter onto Ruggles Ferry and it's few subsidiary side streets. We are still proud to be an agricultural area. Farm equipment use Ruggles Ferry with slow-moving equipment. As you know, most of this two-lane road is double-lined, no pass zone. We have all witnessed what happens when frustrated drivers take risks.

We are seeing a growth in our part of the county. I am aware of three other smaller developments being proposed. I am very concerned about the impact of this greatly increased student population will have on Carter Schools.

We respectfully ask that a decision be delayed since our community was only made aware of this impactful development. Thank you

March 6, 2021
at 9:12 AM

Mary Gail
37871

3-SB-21-C
Mary Gail (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:34 AM

I oppose the development of Innsbruck Farms as proposed. The housing density is not in keeping with immediate neighborhood and general east Knox County area. We choose to retire here over 5 years ago. After living in “subdivisions” in Dallas, Houston, and California, we were attracted to the slower pace semi-rural nature of this area. West Knoxville certainly offered more of the amenities we were accustomed to (shopping, doctors, restaurants) but we were willing to make the extra drive to enjoy surroundings of natural beauty and open spaces. We have seen too many blighted landscapes of cheek by jowl rooflines on postage stamp, scraped earth parcels of land. They are an abomination here, an insult to current residents and a testament to heedless & unconscionable profit mongering. I do not oppose all development. I do oppose this proposed plan of suffocating density. It does not belong in our neighborhood.

March 6, 2021
at 9:34 AM

March 6, 2021
at 10:52 AM

Jeffrey
37871

3-SB-21-C
Jeffrey (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:52 AM

Let me first say that the meeting scheduled for Monday needs to be postponed to a later date. the citizens of this area need more time to gather facts, information, and plans to work in concert with the developer. I have not spoken to anyone who is against well planned and thought out growth and development. The proposed size and density of Innsbruck Farms brings with it many concerns, including but not limited too, dramatic traffic increase, sewage handling, traffic and pedestrian safety on Ruggles Ferry and connecting side roads, and current property values. This area does not have the infrastructure to handle a development of this size, and continue the quality of life for those who live here. I have lived on Ruggles Ferry for 57 years and have witnessed well planned growth and development. The proposed size of this development, and the safety concerns it brings is the exact opposite of well planned and thought out. The proposed Innsbruck Farms development is about nothing more than cramming in as many homes as possible, and making the most money possible, without concern for the surrounding community and the citizens who live here. As stated earlier, I am not against growth and development: however, I am opposed to development that is bereft of common sense, and concern for the surrounding community and its people. Thank you for your thought and attention regarding this urgent matter. Sincerely, Jeff McMillan

March 6, 2021
at 11:03 AM

Garlena
37871

3-SB-21-C
Garlena (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM

Please accept my letter of opposition for the Innsbruck Farms development proposed off Ruggles Ferry Pike.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306110323.pdf

March 6, 2021
at 11:04 AM

Melinda
37924

3-SB-21-C
Melinda (37924), March 6, 2021 at 11:04 AM

I not against growth in our community but I believe 400 + houses are the extreme! My biggest problem is the roads.. PLEASE before approving this ride on these roads.. Wooddale, Cash, Pleasant Hill & especially Burris Rd. These are small roads that if passing a wide truck not to mention a school bus you have to stop!!! School busses with precious cargo + 1000 more cars! The red lights lights at the end of Ruggles will not help the back roads!! And the roads should be fixed before any houses go up! Please think about the safety of our children & NO one should have to cross the road to get their mail... Death trap!

March 6, 2021
at 11:05 AM

Donald
37871

3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:05 AM

Please accept this as my opposition to the Innsbruck Farms development proposed off Ruggles Ferry Pike.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306110555.pdf

March 6, 2021
at 11:19 AM

Robbie
7871

3-SB-21-C
Robbie (7871), March 6, 2021 at 11:19 AM

Development is out of character with current homes and lots. Feeder roads are not designed to handle the extra traffic this development will produce. We moved here for peace and simplicity from west Knoxville. Please don’t destroy this area.

March 6, 2021
at 11:21 AM

Justin
37871

3-SB-21-C
Justin (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:21 AM

I respectfully oppose the plans for Innsbruck Farms. Growth and development is good but it is a travesty to learn that the current plans for this development if not ratified would result in the most densely populated subdivision in Knox county. We are not west Knoxville. We do not have the infrastructure, developments, schools and other public amenities to support a development of 482 lots in this area especially considering other planned developments in this area. The people of our community need the MPC to support our opposition and vote to limit the number of lots in this development. We support the decision to develop but this level of density will be a detriment to our community and the proposal clearly doesn’t take into consideration the negative impacts on our residents. Rather it’s only about squeezing in the most homes to make the most profits possible for the developer and land owner. Please consider to delay and oppose the current plans so that we may keep everyone’s best interests in consideration. Thanks Justin Cate

March 6, 2021
at 11:25 AM

Jeanine
37871

3-SB-21-C
Jeanine (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:25 AM

I am opposed to the proposed development, (Innsbruck) , on the basis of the density of # of homes per acre. 480 homes is way out of line if you consider the already established area surrounding the Innsbruck project. I strongly encourage you to table your vote re: Innsbruck. more time to consider other ratios within reason. The affect this project will have long term is far too important and should not be rushed through. This was just brought to our attention in the last month. In summary..... concerns are: traffic increase; peaceful setting that we invested in; impact on wildlife; community safety; further impact regarding increased interest in future developments.

March 6, 2021
at 11:34 AM

Jim and Donna
37871

3-SB-21-C
Jim and Donna (37871), March 6, 2021 at 11:34 AM

We are concerned and opposed to the subject development in our area. Reasons for this opposition include the impact on the traffic on 2-lane Ruggles Ferry Pike and also side roads that are sometimes difficult to maneuver because of the roads being narrow and winding. We see new housing going on around us continually, but the number proposed for this area seems unreasonable and would like to see a reduction in the number of houses on this property. Another concern is about the schools in the area being able to handle the possible increase in students. Thank you for taking the time to hear our community's concerns.

March 6, 2021
at 12:26 PM

Jessica
37871

3-SB-21-C
Jessica (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:26 PM

My family lives 2 miles from new development that is proposing 482 homes. We are 100% against this. Our small two lane road cannot accommodate such traffic. We are very concerned for the safety of our community.

March 6, 2021
at 12:47 PM

Julia
37871

3-SB-21-C
Julia (37871), March 6, 2021 at 12:47 PM

My husband and I strongly disagree with this high-density planned development with crowding homes on small lots when the uniformity of the surrounding area is lots at a minimum of 1 acre. Reasons as an insufficient traffic safety was performed during a pandemic, a Level 3 Traffic Study is requested. Existing infrastructure issues now and an increase of 482 homes will only impact that further. The duration of living through a construction zone for 10 years. The horrible affect on the living creatures in the environment. Safety concern of traffic issues with accessing our homes.

We oppose this high-density development but would appreciate a lower-density development of 1 acre per home at a minimum, for our safety and livelihood.

Larry
37924

3-SB-21-C
Larry (37924), March 6, 2021 at 2:20 PM

Opposition to this Concept PlanReasons1. Traffic could not handle: Ashville Hwy, Ruggles Ferry Rd, Burris RD, Wooddale Rd, and Cash Rd2. Danger to residents due to massive construction of homes, roads sewer, water, Electrical work (KUB), Xfinity. AT&T 3. Community does not have facilities in this area to handle the mass number of people that would be relocating here4. Changing a rural Framing community, large lots for residential homes, to massive housing development5. Destroying the tranquility and environment of this area

March 6, 2021
at 2:20 PM

Pam
37871

3-SB-21-C
Pam (37871), March 6, 2021 at 2:21 PM

I am seriously concerned about the traffic safety issues and the overwhelming burden the Innsbrook Farms development would place on our schools in the Carter community. I vehemently oppose the proposed development plan. Thank you.

March 6, 2021
at 2:21 PM

rebecca
37924

3-SB-21-C
rebecca (37924), March 6, 2021 at 2:41 PM

1-we live in this area for forty years because we wanted a quiet, peaceful, country setting. the increased traffic, planned subdivision of 480 homes will destroy this setting due to extreme overcrowding, noise pollution, increase traffic which leads to increased accidents on these narrow country roads. i am not opposed to building in this area but it should be where it fits into the country flavor of this area and reflects the homes already built on Ruggles Ferry. possibly decrease the number of homes by half the number proposed.

March 6, 2021
at 2:41 PM

Jennifer
37764

3-SB-21-C
Jennifer (37764), March 6, 2021 at 3:09 PM

To whom it may concern, We strongly oppose the proposed build of 482 homes in our rural community of Strawberry Plains. I live in River Islands subdivision, so I am in favor of proper development, as long as it is thoughtful. Many family and loved ones will be strongly affected by this plan, from their home/road/land, schools, lifestyle, privacy and safety. I grew up in East Knoxville, and these small back roads are not built to support this type of development. I have been entirely disappointed to hear of the proposed plan and hope that the builder might reconsider. I think the Carter community needs “less of the same” and instead build more upscale, custom homes with larger lot sizes that attract more economic support to our schools, churches and community. I strongly oppose this plan, and I hope that our many voices are heard. Thank you.

March 6, 2021
at 3:09 PM

Josh
55555

3-SB-21-C
Josh (55555), March 6, 2021 at 4:20 PM

This project could have substantial runoff issues for the Holston river which could impact the natural species that live and around it. The river is also a big destination/attraction for people and their families from all over that enjoy recreation water sports on the Holston. The Holston and lower watersheds such as the Tennessee River are famous for its smallmouth bass which are a big draw for the Knoxville area and especially for the tourism industry. Projects like this can have lasting affects on the ecosystems for generations.

March 6, 2021
at 4:20 PM

Randy
37871

3-SB-21-C
Randy (37871), March 6, 2021 at 7:46 PM

I attended a meeting this evening requested by the property interests and developer. After two hours of presentation and a Q&A session, I request the Planning Commission postpone a final determination on this concept plan.The reasons are the suddenness of the proposal and comments from the meeting today. By his own admission, the developer is in various stages of completing a website for the development, working on some safety and traffic concerns, considering amenities (non motorized vehicle access to the river, sidewalks, dog park, etc.), and finalizing covenants and restrictions.I support quality, safe, and sustainable development. I am very concerned that this very dense development will have unintended consequences for our community and result in very similar traffic/safety concerns endemic to This west Knox County.This is not consistent with the rural nature of East Knox County. Folks moving to our end of the county are not looking for this type dense neighborhood. This is an opportunity for the planning staff to have think a little out of the box for a unique neighborhood.If the county wants this type of development then maybe the county should fund some of the safety concerns expressed by my neighbors in our meeting today.

March 6, 2021
at 7:46 PM

Wilma
924

3-SB-21-C
Wilma (924), March 6, 2021 at 8:46 PM

I believe this project is not proper for our rural community. Traffic is already bad, plus the speeding is daily. Plus our children and walking,bikers are in jeopardy already. Our schools will be over crowded and terrible traffic during business hours. The side roads to Asheville Highway are so narrow you have to come to a stop to be able to pass. Blind hill is at the entrance so how long would it be before someone would be killed due to the frequent speeding. Too many homes to add, should be more of a community setting like we already have.

March 6, 2021
at 8:46 PM

RONNIE
37871

3-SB-21-C
RONNIE (37871), March 6, 2021 at 9:21 PM

The current development of 482 lots for houses that are going be built takes no true data showing the roads can handle the traffic. A vehicle count was taken only on one end of Ruggles Ferry which receives the least traffic. The west end is the most traveled due to the majority are headed to West Knoxville to work. The is a major safety issue for the current community. The houses that surround that have recently been built are on at least one acre to five acre tracts of land and most all wouldn’t have built if they knew this was going to happen. The feeder roads such as Burris Road and Cash road are not adequate for two vehicles to pass in certain sections. The concern is pollution to the Holstein River from run off and holding ponds. Such beautiful farm land to be cut up with such poor planning. Not happy with development but at least could have been one house per acre to keep our rural area safe and not so congested.

March 6, 2021
at 9:21 PM

March 6, 2021
at 10:28 PM

Shannon
37871

3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), March 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM

I strongly oppose Innsbruck development as proposed. It is too dense of a project and poses a safety risk to this area. I am attaching a PDF file.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210306222816.pdf

Elizabeth
37871

3-SB-21-C
Elizabeth (37871), March 7, 2021 at 8:18 AM

As a homeowner whose property adjoins this proposed development, I plead with the MPC to reject this concept plan. A bird's-eye view of Ruggle's Ferry Road reveals that the density of this planned subdivision is wholly out of sync with the character of this community. Twenty-five years ago, my husband and I bought nearly thirteen acres at auction and built our dream home here. We relocated from a crowded Cedar Bluff subdivision so that we could raise our four children in a place where they had room to explore, wildlife to observe, and fresh air to breathe in safety. We envisioned our grandchildren enjoying the same blessings. If the MPC approves this concept plan, you will allow this developer to bring West Knoxville to my backyard, literally---twenty lots squeezed along my property line. Please send this developer back to the drawing board. This property should be developed in a more intelligent, more respectful way that adds value to our beautiful community.

March 7, 2021
at 8:18 AM

March 7, 2021
at 11:25 AM

Sally
37924

3-SB-21-C
Sally (37924), March 7, 2021 at 11:25 AM

Please reconsider the site plan for this development. We are a RURAL community. We object to the projected noise pollution, light pollution, water pollution, and the increased traffic this dense housing development will bring to our community.

Vicki
37871

3-SB-21-C
Vicki (37871), March 7, 2021 at 1:07 PM

Hello, My family and I moved from a busy east Knoxville neighborhood to a beautiful 10 acre property on Shackleford Lane 7 years ago, mainly because we needed land and a barn for our six horses. Our property is very typical of other properties in this beautiful community, most houses on 5 to 15 acres aside from the large farms that remain and are actively being farmed. A high density subdivision simply does not match this community nor are the roads able to accommodate safely the kind of traffic this number of houses would bring in. Therefore we are strongly opposed to this developer's plan.

March 7, 2021
at 1:07 PM

Brittany
30024

3-SB-21-C
Brittany (30024), March 7, 2021 at 1:35 PM

I oppose the development of 482 lots on Ruffles Ferry Pike. This will be the largest and most dense development in the entire county. There has been no study done to see the effect this will have on the environment and echo systems in the area. The roads don’t have the infrastructure to handle all of the traffic this will bring and plainly put, no one wants to see the land demolished.

March 7, 2021
at 1:35 PM

Jill
37924

3-SB-21-C
Jill (37924), March 7, 2021 at 1:50 PM

I oppose the housing development project, and respectfully request delaying the planned development until an environmental study has been conducted. The vast density of this development will cause untold stress in this small communities infrastructure. Respectfully, Jill McMillan.

March 7, 2021
at 1:50 PM

Roy
37924

3-SB-21-C
Roy (37924), March 7, 2021 at 2:46 PM

I am Against this Subdivision of House’s and will be willing to speak or whatever is needed to get this Stopped!!!! Thanks

March 7, 2021
at 2:46 PM

Robert
37924

3-SB-21-C
Robert (37924), March 7, 2021 at 4:21 PM

We do not support the above mentioned project. The two main reasons being the density and the traffic. The roads that are to accommodate this project is not sufficient for the traffic. We request that you consider delaying the project until a better plan can be worked out to accommodate our community better and the neighbors surrounding the project.

March 7, 2021
at 4:21 PM

Rhett
37924

3-SB-21-C
Rhett (37924), March 7, 2021 at 4:49 PM

I live close to the proposed development, right off one of the feeder roads (Burris Lane), on Whitlock Lane. I have lived in this house for almost 35 years and moved here to be in a rural setting. Like most I hear, I am definitely not again growth, just not the proposed "crowded city development" in the middle of the country. The feeder roads which I travel to access Ruggles Ferry and Asheville Hwy are very narrow and many times require stopping to let another vehicle pass. It seems like this proposal needs some more input before proceeding ahead. Maybe a compromise, as to the density of the project, would be both wise and definitely safer.

March 7, 2021
at 4:49 PM

Angela
37764

3-SB-21-C
Angela (37764), March 7, 2021 at 5:00 PM

I speaking on behalf of my family that lives on Ruggles Ferry and my concern of the extra traffic it is going to cause with this proposed development. I’ve had family that has lived on this road for over 60+ years and Ruggles has become a heavy traffic area. I would ask you to allow the home owners a continuance in this,so they could work together with the developer to reach a solution with their concerns.

March 7, 2021
at 5:00 PM

Larry
37764

3-SB-21-C
Larry (37764), March 7, 2021 at 5:03 PM

I am contacting you concerning the subdivision build on Blake Lane off Ruggles Ferry. I have family members who live across the road from where the developers want to put 482 houses on this farm land. I am asking that you grant a continuance to the homeowners to work out a solution with the developers on a solution to the obvious problems regarding this development. Thank you

March 7, 2021
at 5:03 PM

Scott
37924

3-SB-21-C
Scott (37924), March 7, 2021 at 6:12 PM

I am AGAINST THIS Subdivision. This road cannot handle that many more cars on it. The school can’t handle that many more kids

March 7, 2021
at 6:12 PM

Brenda
37924

3-SB-21-C
Brenda (37924), March 7, 2021 at 6:37 PM

I oppose Innsbruck development because of: Safety Roads Schools Congestion Affect on farming

March 7, 2021
at 6:37 PM

Donna
37871

3-SB-21-C
Donna (37871), March 7, 2021 at 6:39 PM

The proposed development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry is way too many for this area. The additional number of automobiles on this stretch of the road will be very dangerous for the residents that already live along the road. They could very well be taking their lives in their hands just to walk across the road to get their mail. This community is small and rural and the residents that live there want it to remain that way. The time it will take to construct all this development will cause damage to this setting. The developer and the seller of the property are only interested in MONEY. They don't care how much this project will inconvenience the current residents. They don't care how all of the equipment going back and forth will damage the roads. They don't care how the noise will affect the peace of the neighborhood. The development should not be permitted.

March 7, 2021
at 6:39 PM

Traci
37924

3-SB-21-C
Traci (37924), March 7, 2021 at 6:47 PM

I OPPOSE THIS HAPPENING. THE ROAD COULD NOT HANDLE THAT MUCH TRAFFIC.

IT WOULD ALSO BE VERY DANGEROUS FOR FARMERS WHO ARE TRYING TO TRAVEL DOWN ROAD WITH HAY OR TAKING CARE OF LIVESTOCK. I AM NOT SURE HOW THEY COULD SAFELY MANUVER DOWN RUGGLES FERRY WITH THAT MANY PEOPLE.

I AM NOT SURE HOW OUR ROAD COULD SUPPORT THAT MUCH TRAFFIC. HOW COULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO EVERY MOVE UP OR DOWN THE ROAD WITHOUT HEAVY TRAFFIC.

I AM ALSO OPPOSE TO THE NUMBER OF HOMES PER ACRE. MOST HOMES ON THIS ROAD HAVE AT LEAST AN ACRE.

March 7, 2021
at 6:47 PM

Patricia B.
37924

3-SB-21-C
Patricia B. (37924), March 8, 2021 at 6:56 AM

I do not support the development that is planned for Ruggles Ferry Pike. I have lived there for MANY years and seen many changes. I want it added that I OPPOSE any development outside of one family homes in our beautiful community. DON'T LET THEM DESTROY IT.

March 8, 2021
at 6:56 AM

Julie
N/A

3-SB-21-C
Julie (N/A), March 8, 2021 at 8:34 AM

Attached is our letter of objection to this development. One added comment is that there are homes still for sell in surrounding developments in this area.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308083424.pdf

March 8, 2021
at 8:34 AM

Shannon
37871

3-SB-21-C
Shannon (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:38 AM

I am writing to oppose 3-SB-21-C a new development in East Knoxville near Ruggles Ferry Golf Course. I have included a letter that I would appreciate you taking the time to read and consider.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308083847.pdf

March 8, 2021
at 8:38 AM

Frank H.
N/A

3-SB-21-C
Frank H. (N/A), March 8, 2021 at 8:43 AM

Residents in the Strawberry Plains area have recently been made aware of a new development, “Innsbruck Farms" positioned on the banks of the Holston River in Strawberry Plains. This development consists of 482 homes on 171 acres of land, and currently ranks in the top three highest density populations in Knox County. Notwithstanding the impact on existing infrastructure, traffic, etc., the impacts on the ecosystem bear investigation. In contrast, I oppose the development as a Sportsmen, Conservationist, and a Champion of Environmental Quality simply due to the run-off into the Holston River.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308084333.pdf

March 8, 2021
at 8:43 AM

Allen
37871

3-SB-21-C
Allen (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:00 AM

We oppose the Innsbruck Farms development. The concept plan shows 482 lots on 171 acres. The current infrastructure along Ruggles Ferry Pike cannot handle this type of development.

March 8, 2021
at 9:00 AM

Allen

3-SB-21-C
Allen March 8, 2021 at 9:07 AM

I oppose the Innsbruck Farms development due to the housing density that is proposed. The current infrastructure along North Ruggles Ferry Pike cannot handle this size of development.

I'm not opposed to growth however I am opposed to 3 home per acre type builds.

March 8, 2021
at 9:07 AM

Michael (Bo)
37871

3-SB-21-C
Michael (Bo) (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:28 AM

Please see attached letter dated 03-08-2021
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308092809.pdf

March 8, 2021
at 9:28 AM

March 8, 2021
at 11:41 AM

Stanley
37871

3-SB-21-C
Stanley (37871), March 8, 2021 at 11:41 AM

Concerning the plan to build 482 homes on 171 Acres or 2.8 homes per acre. Concern #1 traffic on Ruggles Ferry Pk, which is already a busy 2 lane road. With 482 homes and 2 cars per home there would be 964 vehicles. To get to Ashville Highway many would travel Buris Rd., Cash Rd., or Weeddale Rd. All are very narrow and heavily populated with many children playing and people walking and riding bikes; they will not be able to handle this amount of traffic. Recent traffic count paid for by the developer on the other end of Ruggles going toward Strawberry Plains does not come close to the amount of traffic going toward Knoxville or the interstate. This amount of traffic on these narrow roads will cause many accidents, as well as, serious injuries and deaths. This property has 2 creeks that empty into the Holston River. The current plan to build this many homes cannot contain run off and will pollute the river. This amount of homes will also overpopulate Carter Schools. Construction using heavy equipment and trucks will destroy Ruggles Ferry Pk. This community does not attempt to keep from growing. This property could be a very nice development with larger lots and houses. This type of development will destroy our community as I have known it for 78 years. Please do your job and help our community to reach a better plan for the number of homes on this property.

March 8, 2021
at 11:43 AM

Kevin
37918

3-SB-21-C
Kevin (37918), March 8, 2021 at 11:43 AM

See attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308114356.pdf

March 8, 2021
at 12:11 PM

Janet and Robbie

3-SB-21-C
Janet and Robbie March 8, 2021 at 12:11 PM

My husband, Robbie, and I are opposed to this proposal as presented to us by the developers Saturday afternoon at neighborhood meeting. The proposed development is too dense for the character of our neighborhood. Consideration has not been given to the impact it will have on roads, schools and ecology of the area.

We were surprised when we heard this was happening and need more time to research and talk with developers as we are all affected by huge change.

Why try to bring west Knoxville here? Space is the character of east Knoxville. Help us keep it that way. Is this really the biggest neighborhood project in Knox County?

March 8, 2021
at 12:44 PM

Susan & Tom
37871

3-SB-21-C
Susan & Tom (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:44 PM

We are opposed to the Innsbruck Farms proposal as submitted. See pdf attachment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308124430.pdf

March 8, 2021
at 12:45 PM

Brandon & Kendra
37871

3-SB-21-C
Brandon & Kendra (37871), March 8, 2021 at 12:45 PM

We oppose the development of 482 lots off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. The numbers of houses is way too much for this area. Our farmers on tractors up and down this road are now in danger due to the high traffic that this development will bring. Our roads are now in danger. Our school system in the Carter community is not even equipped for this. We truly love our small and RURAL community and how we wish it could stay this way. This development should NOT be permitted. We strongly oppose.

Joshua
37924

3-SB-21-C
Joshua (37924), March 8, 2021 at 1:31 PM

I grew up in the Carter community. As a part of the Blake family I have fond memories of my grandfather "Rennie" and how he lived as a farmer and integral member of this community. Tractor rides with my grandfather on Ruggles Ferry Road, snapping beans with my grandmother Lillian, fishing for turtles to sell, seeing the interactions between my family and the community as they picked their own crops and took them to the store to pay and converse...these are a few of the memories and legacy of this area. Like many who are concerned with the new development I am not opposed to bringing more people into this area to enjoy it as well, but I am concerned that a massive housing development would forever change the feel and legacy that my family has had the privilege to be a part of for decades and centuries in truth. I have moved back to this area in hopes that my children will be able to appreciate the land and its people as I have. We have begun to use the land that my grandparents kept to pass on to us. My wife and I only have the beginnings of a small farm with chickens and a garden starting, but our plans are to expand and see what all we can accomplish in farming as a family in the years to come. I don't think the feel and spirit of area is to have the kind of development that has been proposed. I am not asking to halt everything all together, only to more carefully consider what the ramifications will be of such an undertaking. Thank you.

March 8, 2021
at 1:31 PM

Tim
37871

3-SB-21-C
Tim (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:03 PM

I live near the proposed development and I am strongly opposed to this Concept Plan and the negative impact on our community. I am supportive of well thought out planned development, but this plan fails in so many areas. This is one of the largest and highest density plans in all of Knox County to build 482 homes in our community. Our rural community will have major negative impact on our traffic, safety, infrastructure, side or feeder roads, and change the perspective of our entire rural character forever! This plan is not in alignment with the East Knox County Sector and East Knox Community Plans that were provided to give guidance for these types of future developments - in fact this is contrary to all of the primary objectives of those plans for future well thought out development. The traffic study accompanying this plan calls for significant recommendations from the negative impact of 4,400+ new daily trips as a result of this new planned development. I respectfully request a postponement of the March 11th meeting and allow our community 30-60 days to respond to the developer on this plan which is still being changed weekly. Thanks for your consideration.

March 8, 2021
at 2:03 PM

Bill
37871

3-SB-21-C
Bill (37871), March 8, 2021 at 2:14 PM

See attached file
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210308141419.pdf

March 8, 2021
at 2:14 PM

Herbert
N/A

3-SB-21-C
Herbert (N/A), March 8, 2021 at 3:40 PM

I’m contacting you about Innsbruck Farms development (Item 22, file #3-SB-21-C) This project came to the attention of the community about 3 weeks ago. There were many attempts to reach the developers with questions. We finally met with a representative on March 6th. Their plan is not complete and has changed many times in the 3 weeks. The traffic study showed an additional 4,400 trips per day on Ruggles Ferry Pike. Not to mention very narrow roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to Asheville Highway. Our community is not trying to stop the development, but simply asking the developers to be more responsible and sensitive to our rural community. In the +-5,700 acres that make up our community between the Holston River and Asheville Hwy & AJ Highway, there are approximately 800 homes. This developer is proposing 482 homes on +- 200 acres. We are asking for at least a 30 postponement, but a 60 day postponement would be better. I’m asking for your help. Again, we are not trying to stop development in our area, instead we are asking for developers and MPC be sensitive to our rural character. Also, efforts mentioned in the East Knox Community Plan which was adopted in 2017, have been for the most part not been considered in this plan. This is an opportunity for Knox County to have a showcase development. But 482 homes on +-200 acres is just not acceptable to our community. We want to work with the developer.

March 8, 2021
at 3:40 PM

Mary Beth
37871

3-SB-21-C
Mary Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:23 PM

As a lifetime resident of this community, I am writing to oppose the massive Innsbruck Farms subdivision. I am not opposed to a property owner wanting to develop his land nor am I opposed to welcome new neighbors. But anyone can look and see how our rural community looks. This obnoxiously sized subdivision does nothing to offer beneficial growth. Its throwing in 482 homes that our roads, schools and even emergency services can not support. It will ruin the community for those of us who have loved and supported and want the best for not just ourselves but for our neighbors as well. We politely and strongly urge you to refuse this massive development and encourage the developer to plan a development that benefits not only him but the whole community. I also ask that you consider yourself personally in this matter and what you would want if you were faced with a neighborhood destroying development. Please allow our community to keep its rural setting

March 8, 2021
at 4:23 PM

Hali
37871

3-SB-21-C
Hali (37871), March 8, 2021 at 4:25 PM

I read an article stating there was no way to stop the build of this subdivision, but is there any way to tremendously downsize? Residents of this area love that they have big yards, and livable ground. Putting this many houses in one area will not only be an eye sore, it will absolutely take away from the rural part of our community. Not to mention traffic concerns. There's a projected 1,000 car increase, and that's not what we need, especially in this particular area. Blake Lane is a dead end road, it's quiet, no traffic, we don't want, or need subdivision access on our road. We like quiet, laid back, and we most certainly love the view that we have without adding almost 500 houses and tons of cars in and out. This isn't the city. I understand the builders and contractors making money and creating revenue, but I don't believe it should be done at the expense of the Ruggles Ferry community.

March 8, 2021
at 4:25 PM

Kraig
3787

3-SB-21-C
Kraig ( 3787), March 8, 2021 at 4:27 PM

Due to the size of the proposed development and the short notice given to the community I feel that a continuation on the hearing is warranted We. need to be able to deliver our concerns.

March 8, 2021
at 4:27 PM

Catherine
37871

3-SB-21-C
Catherine (37871), March 8, 2021 at 6:03 PM

Hello, I am a member of the Carter Community and very concerned about this proposed development. While I am not opposed to forward progress and development as a whole, the size and range of homes proposed as part of this plan are unfortunately not in alignment with the surrounding area nor reflective of the type of development most desired by the community. There are numerous subdivisions already established in our community, two of which are currently expanding, that offer the same housing options that are being proposed. What our community doesn't have, and can support, is a housing range that is a step higher offering larger lots with custom homes that is complementary to what is already being built in that area. Personally, my family, and several like mine that have ties to and are grounded in this community, are looking for homes in the $400k and up range that have more spacious lots. Continuing on with this proposed plan will also very likely drive many of the invested families that have built nearby to move elsewhere outside of our community. That means they are also taking their economic value with them and unfortunately leaving a large void in their wake. The goal would be to build up our community value not diminish it. I hope you consider not moving forward with such a large development that doesn't support a long term need and does not serve our community. Thank you.

March 8, 2021
at 6:03 PM

Jeff
37871

3-SB-21-C
Jeff (37871), March 8, 2021 at 8:35 PM

I feel that the housing density of this planned subdivision is to much for the area it is in. I am not opposed to developing the land just not at this volume with more land in the area that has the ability to be developed in the future. It will put the poeple on this road in a dangerous future if the density is allowed to start at this rate

March 8, 2021
at 8:35 PM

Beth
37871

3-SB-21-C
Beth (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:18 PM

The proposed development of Innsbruck Farms should be reconsidered in regards to the number of houses intended to be built. A sudden growth of such magnitude for this area would greatly negatively affect the present surroundings. Further accurate assessments of the traffic situation should be performed to see the true ramifications of the proposed addition of 483 homes on the rural country roads running near this property. I am not opposed to the development taking place, but feel a reduction of homes involved would be better suited for the area. Doubling the lot sizes and reducing the number of homes in half would seem like a reasonable resolution to consider. I understand the necessity of business and profit, but feel this should not supersede doing the right thing in development of this project. I ask that more time be given to reconsider the present plan and make changes that would be more appropriate for the community while still providing a reasonable profit for the developer. Thank you.

March 8, 2021
at 9:18 PM

David
37871

3-SB-21-C
David (37871), March 8, 2021 at 9:26 PM

The density of this development is outrageous in comparison to the other properties in the area. I do not oppose the development, just the totally ridiculous decision to pack so many houses into it and then overload the area regarding traffic and utilities. This development just does not fit nor belong in this area in its presently proposed density. My family has been in East Knox County since the 1850’s and I have lived on Ruggles Ferry Pike the past 15 years. The rural character of this area should be preserved as much as possible even as it is understood that growth and development are inevitable. The responsible way to address the issue is to propose a plan that fits the area regarding lot sizes and house density. It is readily apparent that there has been an attempt to maximize the potential profit of a packed subdivision at the expense of preserving the character of the area. Please allow time for these matters to be respectfully discussed so that any reasonable alternatives can be explored regarding density and so that further evaluation of the effects on traffic and utilities can be properly assessed. Thank you. David L. Parker, DDS

March 8, 2021
at 9:26 PM

March 8, 2021
at 10:12 PM

Elyse
37924

3-SB-21-C
Elyse (37924), March 8, 2021 at 10:12 PM

As a resident in the area, I am very concerned about not only how it will change the feel and look of the area (the reason we moved here last fall), but also the safety and feasibility of adding such an enormous development. Our little road off of Ruggles Ferry can barely handle two cars passing each other as it is. The extra traffic on the feeder roads as well as Ruggles Ferry itself is a huge safety concern. I’m also worried, as a Realtor, if that many houses in a rural area subdivision will truly sell. I haven’t had a client in 3 years wanting to move INTO a subdivision. I wonder if the first phase of homes don’t sell as the developer hopes, if the remaining lots will be snatched up by a big name builder who will build cheap, unsightly homes and further ruin the land that has been a treasured part of this community for generations. The wildlife alone would be reason enough to conserve the land. When you add safety concerns - and if a traffic study was done on the side roads (which people WILL use) - it’s unbelievable such a project is even being considered by Knox county. I implore you not to allow this to happen to our community.

March 8, 2021
at 11:51 PM

Kelly
37924

3-SB-21-C
Kelly (37924), March 8, 2021 at 11:51 PM

I live on a road used as a cut through between Asheville Hwy and Ruggles Ferry. Our road is scary now, I cannot imagine what it will be once nearly 500 families move to our area. In my mind, that’s at least 600 more vehicles on our road. Speed, blind hills, elderly neighbors, children = safety concern. With the addition of houses on Ruggles Ferry golf course and more houses around the Graves road area have proven that our road is the main crossover between Asheville/Ruggles Ferry. On Cash Rd, we take our safety into our own hands when we leave home. Adding the additional traffic will just complicate our ability to leave home.

Mary
37871

3-SB-21-C
Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 8:21 AM

This plan will overwhelm the community. The roads, schools and businesses are not designed to have this many people. It will change the integrity of the community and is not welcomed. Change and growth are both invited, this change is too traumic for this community.

March 9, 2021
at 8:21 AM

David
37871

3-SB-21-C
David (37871), March 9, 2021 at 9:12 AM

Please see attached letter of opposition for 3-SB-21-C.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309091232.pdf

March 9, 2021
at 9:12 AM

March 9, 2021
at 10:34 AM

Mary
37871

3-SB-21-C
Mary (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:34 AM

I add my voice of opposition to the Concept Plan for this property. I second the concerns others have expressed about traffic, safety, burden on schools & infrastructure. Mr Chrisman admitted at our meeting with him on Saturday night that he has not performed due diligence....he has not performed market demand analysis to truly assess what buyers want. He stated”I know what demand is from builders.” He also seemed surprised to learn how much large (1-2+acres) have sold for recently, with larger, upscale homes built....homes that “fit” into the pastoral feel of the area. Homes like those surrounding his proposed development. When asked if he could consider building fewer homes on larger lots, he stated “the numbers don’t work.” Well of course we get it....scraping the land, building miles of roads and sewer lines is expensive. Perhaps those “numbers” could be different if he rethinks his plan, let’s go of his ego and works towards a different understanding of the best use of this property. He might make “the number” work with fewer roads, fewer sewers, fewer houses. Mr Chrisman should be sent back to his drawing board. We are people here, not numbers.

March 9, 2021
at 10:53 AM

jay
37871

3-SB-21-C
jay (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:53 AM

Lot sizes are to small for the development. The houses near there are on over half an acre. I would like the developer to make the lot sizes bigger so it will maintain house value in that area.

March 9, 2021
at 11:03 AM

Catie
37871

3-SB-21-C
Catie (37871), March 9, 2021 at 11:03 AM

Please reconsider allowing this development of over 400 new homes on Ruggles Ferry. My husband and I recently moved back home to Strawberry Plains with hopes of raising our children in a more rural area after spending the last 10 years living in large cities like Charlotte and Atlanta. We are currently building a home that will now be directly beside the entrance to this subdivision. I’m obviously concerned about the safety of my kids as they play in our yard, the traffic that will come considering there’s no infrastructure to support the added travelers, the overcrowding that will happen to the schools, the environmental impact that it will have on the river, and the way a subdivision this size would change the rural feel of this community that so many love and want to protect.

kevin
37871

3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 1:26 PM

I am opposed to this development as it is currently planned.

This is too much to add to this community without tremendous county (taxpayer) investment in road and other improvements. Even with those improvements, it would drastically lower the quality of life for current residents, especially during the proposed 10 year period of construction.

The Ajax transportation impact study included in the case information on the MPC website is missing about 60 pages. This is over 70% of the report that community members can't see. What's on those 60 pages? I think if it laid out plans and definite timelines showing everything would be fine, it would be there. As it is, we don't even know what was considered and what was overlooked. Is this even legal, to withhold this much of a report vital to the plan's consideration from the area stakeholders (residents)?

My more specific comments are in the attached letter. Please read it!
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309132658.pdf

March 9, 2021
at 1:26 PM

Winston
37924

3-SB-21-C
Winston (37924), March 9, 2021 at 2:29 PM

The quick timing and short period for the residence of the area to learn about the Innsbruck Farms Development is troubling. Anytime I see something trying to be pushed through approval in a hurried manner leaves me to believe there is something amiss.

The project is too dense for the surrounding community. The surrounding 5500 acres in the Ruggles Ferry Community has a land to home ratio of over 5 acres per home. This project has a land to home ratio of .34 acres to home. This is a drastic divergence from the residential character of the area.

The developer traffic study was flawed. They didn’t study the traffic pattern to the west (towards Knoxville) of the Innsbruck development which is the direction most traffic will go when leaving this area and consequently will return from this direction. To get to Ashville Highway most of this traffic will use Burris Road and Cash Road which are the main feeder roads for this area of the community, and they are currently inadequate for the existing homes not to mention the very active Ruggles Ferry Golf course traffic. This is a huge safety issue for myself and my neighbors on Cash road and will have disastrous results if not considered and addressed.

March 9, 2021
at 2:29 PM

Winston
37924

3-SB-21-C
Winston (37924), March 9, 2021 at 2:36 PM

My concerns about the Innsbruck Farms Development is the environmental impact this high-density development will have. This development is the first large development for RC Ruggles LLC/Blain Cristman and creates concern about this being engineered and developed correctly. With such high density the increased roofs, driveways, and roads will contribute greatly to water runoff into the Holston river.

Also, the project appears to have insufficient common area for community use. All the common areas on the map are storm water retention ponds, which have no recreational use, except one and it is a ¼ acre dog park. This is not nearly enough common area for a 200 acre tract with 480 homes.

March 9, 2021
at 2:36 PM

kevin
37871

3-SB-21-C
kevin (37871), March 9, 2021 at 5:38 PM

The developer is proposing 482 homes on 172 acres in this development. This calculates out to 2.80 dwelling units/acre. The knox county mpc has a useful tool to help picture what this would look like. The tool can be found at https://maps.knoxmpc.org/apps/DensityExplorer. If you will search ONLY detached housing units and set the DU/Acre slider to 2.7 to 2.8, one of the developments shown will be Creekside Manor in Hardin Valley. It's the small blue box closest to Loudon county on the map and has 2.8 dwelling units per acre according to the stats. Click on the box for aerial views to see what that looks like. That's the density the developer is planning for Innsbruck Farms. Fits in here---NOT!

March 9, 2021
at 5:38 PM

ALLEN
37871

3-SB-21-C
ALLEN (37871), March 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM

SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210309193835.pdf

March 9, 2021
at 7:38 PM

March 9, 2021
at 10:10 PM

Nathan
37871

3-SB-21-C
Nathan (37871), March 9, 2021 at 10:10 PM

We moved to Blake Lane in 2016 as a way for our severely autistic daughter to finally get peace and quiet away from a neighborhood. We have had many instances where she has had severe seizures and life or death was literally decided by a matter of minutes. Ambulances have not had to worry about fighting through traffic to get to our house. This development would change that. If there were an accident on any of the roads between us and the paramedics because of the increased vehicle count, they could arrive to us too late. In addition, when getting off the interstate at Asheville Highway after work each day, I already have to wait ten minutes just to get from the exit ramp on Interstate 40 to John Sevier. I can’t imagine what all the additional cars from this development would do to the after-work commute for all of us.

March 10, 2021
at 7:45 AM

Louis

3-SB-21-C
Louis March 10, 2021 at 7:45 AM

The current Innsbruck Farms subdivision development plan raises significant concerns regarding its impact on the Holston River.

Its proposed construction and resultant occupancy of the subdivision consists of 482 homes on 171 acres of land, an extremely high density.

Without all appropriate studies completed and then given the opportunity for public review, our concerns, given the proximity of the subdivision and it future residents to the Holston River, are for the potential of irreversible and ongoing harm to both its wildlife and downriver human inhabitants along the River including the length of its sensitive riparian environment.

Any and all agency approvals required to proceed with this development should be considered only when the required studies based on thorough and sound environmental protection policies are completed which are measurable, documented and made available for public review.

In addition, assurances should be in place during any preliminary site preparation, all construction and eventual occupancy that no harm be done whatsoever without enforceable consequences should harm occur.

March 10, 2021
at 9:17 AM

Joshua
37871

3-SB-21-C
Joshua (37871), March 10, 2021 at 9:17 AM

The proposed subdivision is too dense for the infrastructure and the community it will be part of. The local roads are not prepared to absorb an additional 1000 vehicles and the side roads connecting Ruggles Ferry to Asheville Hwy are barely wide enough for two cars to pass as is.

Increasing the traffic by that level will not only be a nuisance to existing residents but will pose a safety hazard for other drivers and the pedestrians I see walking on Ruggles Ferry daily. There are no sidewalks or other safe areas in our community for seniors and community members to walk near their homes and this would be removing that as an option.

While I don't oppose development, this level of density will not only impact the traffic on local homes, it will also change the rural feel of our community. It would be an overall negative to quality of life and place a burden on other community members.

Home lots should be restricted to 1 acre minimum at the smallest.

March 10, 2021
at 1:39 PM

Carl

3-SB-21-C
Carl March 10, 2021 at 1:39 PM

In addition to the 130+ comments on the MPC website (as well as the attendance of scores of concerned neighbors at recent meetings on March 5th and 6th), please note the following petitions which have been compiled in the Strawberry Plains community to oppose the Innsbruck Farms concept plan and request a postponement of the vote to approve. I trust that these numbers below speak for themselves. Thank you in advance for listening to the collective voice of concerned neighbors.

Paper Petition from Ruggles Ferry Pike neighbors and surrounding community – See attached… - ~170 physical signatures

Online petition -- https://www.thepetitionsite.com/650/917/529/oppose-concept-plan-3-sb-21-c/ - 547 electronic signatures and counting
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310133958.pdf

March 10, 2021
at 1:45 PM

Carl
37924

3-SB-21-C
Carl (37924), March 10, 2021 at 1:45 PM

In addition to the 130+ comments on the MPC website (as well as the attendance of scores of concerned neighbors at recent meetings on March 5th and 6th), In addition to the 130+ comments on the MPC website (as well as the attendance of scores of concerned neighbors at recent meetings on March 5th and 6th), please note the following petitions which have been compiled in the Strawberry Plains community to oppose the Innsbruck Farms concept plan and request a postponement of the vote to approve. I trust that these numbers below speak for themselves. Thank you in advance for listening to the collective voice of concerned neighbors.

1. Paper Petition from Ruggles Ferry Pike neighbors and surrounding community – See attached PDF >>>>> ~170 physical signatures

2. Online petition -- https://www.thepetitionsite.com/650/917/529/oppose-concept-plan-3-sb-21-c/ >>>>>> 547 electronic signatures and counting

Thank you in advance for your time, efforts, and consideration.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310134541.pdf

March 10, 2021
at 2:35 PM

Daniel
37920

3-SB-21-C
Daniel (37920), March 10, 2021 at 2:35 PM

I represent several members of the Ruggles Ferry Community who oppose the Innsbruck Farms concept plan. Please see the attached correspondence.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310143537.pdf

March 10, 2021
at 6:00 PM

Cara Beth
37871

3-SB-21-C
Cara Beth (37871), March 10, 2021 at 6:00 PM

I am not opposed to growth in the community. I am a real estate agent and I understand the need for more housing in this area. Growth is a great thing for the community however this is a rural area and the roads and schools are not equipped to handle a development this dense. I think the residents of this area need more time to hopefully reach a compromise with the developer so that this new development will become a positive asset to our wonderful community instead of something that will push out the current residents who love it so much.

March 10, 2021
at 7:13 PM

David
37924

3-SB-21-C
David (37924), March 10, 2021 at 7:13 PM

As an almost 30 resident of the Ruggles Ferry community I oppose the Innsbruck Farms subdivision as currently planned and ask the the developer for a postponement or for the Planning Committee to postpone 3-SB-21-C to give all parties more time for review and consideration. Please see my attached letter.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210310191333.pdf

March 10, 2021
at 11:52 PM

Donald
37871

3-SB-21-C
Donald (37871), March 10, 2021 at 11:52 PM

Strongly oppose this development, for the numerous reasons detailed by the 136 other people commenting thus far.

Too large and too crowded of a development for the area.Plan is totally out of character for the area.Traffic study is flawed: done in wrong direction (eastbound, not westbound) on one day only, during a pandemic when most people stayed home--does not represent the true situation.

please deny this application to overbuild a quiet, rural community.

March 11, 2021
at 11:34 AM

Scott
37924

3-SB-21-C
Scott (37924), March 11, 2021 at 11:34 AM

The planning for this is a sham. Little notice was given to the community in what appears to be an attempt to railroad this through. The traffic study that was "done" is completely inadequate as it did not study any of the other roads other than rubbles ferry. Burris rd will not handle 1000 cars a day "their estimate" as the traffic now is less than 20 cars a day. A further traffic study should be done. As the answers the builder gave about schools and roads was that’s the county’s problem.

March 12, 2021
at 9:12 PM

Heather
37924

3-SB-21-C
Heather (37924), March 12, 2021 at 9:12 PM

I hate that I missed getting this submitted before the hearing. But every time I thought about having too I felt sick. I’ve woken up many nights lately dreading this build. The sheer number of houses included is absurd and honestly just plain greedy on the developers part. Our community cannot handle this nor do we want to. I know what our small neighborhood did to Sunnyview community and we are only a neighborhood of 42 houses. Anyone who lives here knows we live this direction for a reason. We drive away from all the congestion. If you live in our community you know that Ruggles Ferry CANNOT handle almost 1000 more cars. Honestly it couldn’t handle 400 more cars from 180 houses. Our schools CANNOT accommodate these families. Personally I moved back to this community for all of these reasons and the fact that my family grew up here. My family are the Burrises of Burris Road. We all love our small community. This is the sort of build that will push us from our homes and to Jefferson City. Alas I know what’s going to be done is going to be done and I have very little faith that it will be the right thing.

March 17, 2021
at 6:52 PM

Peggy
37871

3-SB-21-C
Peggy (37871), March 17, 2021 at 6:52 PM

I am very strongly opposed to this development. Traffic study was flawed in that the counter was in front of my house on the east side of the development near A.J. High on a cold January day during a pandemic when most people were working from home. Most of the traffic will turn west towards Knoxville. Ruggles Ferry and the feeder side roads are not designed to handle the traffic. Schools are almost at capacity now. Does not fit with our rural environment. Please consider the surrounding community when looking at this proposal. We are still a farming community and want to retain our rural way of life.

March 20, 2021
at 4:03 PM

Chris
37924

3-SB-21-C
Chris (37924), March 20, 2021 at 4:03 PM

We my wife & myself have lived on Ruggles Ferry Pike for 42 1/2 years. We built our home in 1978 and have seen more than a few changes over the years. Growth is usually good for rural areas and we feel in this case, based on facts, this is not the case. We live on a two lane road and with
the amount of traffic a 482 home sub division will add to this area will be a huge problem for all who live on or off of Ruggles Ferry Pike. Ruggles Ferry Pike is only 7 Miles Long and the proposed sub division would contain 5.5 miles of roads . We are concerned with changes to our community
and the impact on life as we have known it . One other issue is the fact that this area has been promised two parks over 10 years ago and we still do not have one. A green space like every area in Knoxville contains for walking and enjoying time with family and friends. Please take a few minutes to drive around our community and I hope you will understand why we are requesting a second look at the situation as home owners we find ourselves in. We love our community and enjoy the rural setting we are in.

March 27, 2021
at 10:30 AM

Mia
37924

3-SB-21-C
Mia (37924), March 27, 2021 at 10:30 AM

I oppose the volume of homes being proposed in this project. We are concerned about the volume of cars and traffic and the impact on community services and schools. We moved here because it is a low density neighborhood, so 482 homes on 200 acres will completely reverse that in the area. I have heard from many neighbors in our subdivision who also oppose these plans. Many were told there would not be such an expansion when they chose to move here, and apparently those were outright lies. This is manipulative. Please listen to those living in the area and hear their concerns, as they should have a say over the profit of those wishing to build.

March 27, 2021
at 11:50 AM

Nicole
37924

3-SB-21-C
Nicole (37924), March 27, 2021 at 11:50 AM

The proposed Innsbruck Farms subdivision should not be allowed to move forward in its current form. This area is not designed for this volume of traffic, the schools are not capable of absorbing that many new students, and the density of homes in this cookie-cutter planned development is not going to help maintain property values of homes that have been here for a long time.

When existing AND new construction homes have been on the market for longer than the rest of Knox county here on this side of the county, I have a hard time trying to see how there is even a need for 482 new homes in this area. It seems poorly thought-out on so many levels. Quality over quantity would be much better for this area. Please consider fewer homes and homesites for this area if building has to happen. Maintaining safety and quality of life in our rural area is important to us.

March 29, 2021
at 10:00 PM

Scott
37924

3-SB-21-C
Scott (37924), March 29, 2021 at 10:00 PM

this is an abhorrent plan for the people who live here now. I didn't move here as my neighbors didn't either to be in the middle of a housing slum. This will destroy the very fabric of our community and the reason we live here. I don't want my road widened with a 1000 cars a day on it. When I moved here I was told by the county that the smallest lot size allowed was an acre. Is this guy being allowed to do this because he's rich and bribing people?

March 30, 2021
at 12:06 PM

Nancy
37871

3-SB-21-C
Nancy (37871), March 30, 2021 at 12:06 PM

We have several issues with Innsbruck Farms (Case #3-SB-21-C) and the proposed +/- 500 homes. First the density of the development does not even come close to matching the existing rural area of the Ruggles Ferry Community. Second is the traffic study. One study was completed on Ruggles Ferry Pike. There should be additional studies done on the feeder roads that lead to Andrew Johnson Highway. These roads include Cash Road, Burris Road, Wooddale Road and Pleasant Road. Once the commission sees these studies they will be able to see that the area cannot currently support and additional 4,500 to 5,000 additional trips by passenger cars, school busses, delivery vehicles, farm equipment and construction trucks. Third would be the capacities of our area utilities. None of the utilities have given a definitive answer if the current water, sewer, electrical, gas and sanitation would be able to handle a surge of +/- 500 homes in the area. The best answer given has been "we think". Lastly, has an environmental study been done on the acreage yet? It could be an ecological disaster if a protected specie resides inside that area and is discovered after any type of land development has begun. It is obvious that much more thought and planning needs to go into this development before any approval can be submitted and allowing the developer to move forward.

March 30, 2021
at 6:38 PM

gloria
37924

3-SB-21-C
gloria (37924), March 30, 2021 at 6:38 PM

P lease don't approve this. Ruggles Ferry Pike can not handle the traffic that this subdivision would bring. We already have a large amount of traffic. People leaving the subdivision and going to Knoxville would travel Ruggles Ferry because the other roads are too narrow and crooked. Please consider my request

March 30, 2021
at 11:12 PM

Scott
37917

3-SB-21-C
Scott (37917), March 30, 2021 at 11:12 PM

The level of traffic that this will cause is an abomination. We will not be able to get out of our driveway. we currently see about 20 cars a day go up and down our road and the traffic study says that will increase to a 1000. This level of development will destroy our community and the country way of life we enjoy. These people should be held to the same standard that the county told me when I moved here, that you could not have a lot size smaller than one acre. If they are being allowed to do this I want to know who they are bribing.

March 31, 2021
at 8:45 AM

steve
37924

3-SB-21-C
steve (37924), March 31, 2021 at 8:45 AM

See attached PDF please.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210331084530.pdf

March 31, 2021
at 9:41 PM

Fred
37871

3-SB-21-C
Fred (37871), March 31, 2021 at 9:41 PM

I have great concern for this development because of the number of houses planned and the limited road access to the site. None of the roads that would access the planned site are capable of handling the traffic flow that would be generated by this number of houses. Most of these roads (except for Ruggles Ferry) are narrow country roads that will not allow for a traffic flow of the volume that would result. Please consider limiting the number of houses that would be built in the development. I am not opposed to the development, just to the size of it/number of houses and traffic volume.

Kellen
37924

3-SB-21-C
Kellen (37924), April 2, 2021 at 2:59 PM

Please see attachment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210402145933.pdf

April 2, 2021
at 2:59 PM

April 5, 2021
at 12:13 PM

Staci
37924

3-SB-21-C
Staci (37924), April 5, 2021 at 12:13 PM

I do not support the Innsbruck Farms development. I am concerned about the negative effects this would have on our community.

4-G-21-SP

Betty
37912

4-G-21-SP
Betty (37912), April 6, 2021 at 12:32 PM

Has there been any study done about the traffic diversion if Keck Road is closed in the middle for this development? Keck Road is a cut through road from Callahan to Murray to Central Avenue and the reverse of this. Has any one done a traffic count on Keck Road? I live on Keck Road. While I would like to have less traffic, the Keck Road traffic will be fed to Lacy Road. Can Lacy Road handle the extra traffic? Lacy Road has more driveways on hills and curves. I would like this point to be brought up on Thursday. I am not a great speaker, but will ask about this if necessary.

April 6, 2021
at 12:32 PM

charles
37924

3-SB-21-C
charles (37924), April 7, 2021 at 6:45 PM

Please don't let this pass

April 7, 2021
at 6:45 PM

April 23, 2021
at 6:13 PM

Catherine
37923

5-G-21-UR
Catherine (37923), April 23, 2021 at 6:13 PM

I don’t think we need a third storage facility within a few miles of each other. This new faculty would be across the street from an exciting facility.

April 23, 2021
at 7:45 PM

Crystal
37918

5-G-21-RZ
Crystal (37918), April 23, 2021 at 7:45 PM

Please don't allow this land to be a residential area. My husband and I love on prairie clover lane and our back yard has the beautiful woods between our house and old Tazewell. We bought out house for the nature and beauty of the woods, enjoy watching the blue Jay's and cardinals and the other bird species in our trees. The roads on Murphy and Tazewell are already congested and Smithbuilt is already adding 60 more homes in a subdivision on Murphy road which will add even more traffic and congestion. Please don't do this. Thanks for taking the time to consider our concerns.

April 28, 2021
at 9:23 AM

Catherine
37923

5-G-21-UR
Catherine (37923), April 28, 2021 at 9:23 AM

I don’t think we need a third storage facility within a few miles of each other. This new faculty would be across the street from an exciting facility.

4-M-21-RZ

Sherry
37912

4-M-21-RZ
Sherry (37912), May 1, 2021 at 12:42 PM

Industrial Rezoning of these parcels are not CONSISTENT with the last 100 years of development on Keck Rd. These areas are a wildlife haven which needs to be protected from destruction. Already development in our area has threatened the livelihood of our beloved deer, turkey, birds and numerous other animals. Stewardship of our earth should be practiced to protect the wildlife that reside in this SCARCE HABITAT! Paving and building excessively is not in the best interest of this task. Removal of this woodland area could also promote excessive flooding from runoff.
Please DO NOT REZONE this area! Thank you for your time and consideration in this important decision.

May 1, 2021
at 12:42 PM

4-G-21-SP

Sherry
37912

4-G-21-SP
Sherry (37912), May 1, 2021 at 12:44 PM

May 1, 2021
at 12:44 PM

4-B-21-PA

Sherry
37912

4-B-21-PA
Sherry (37912), May 1, 2021 at 12:46 PM

May 1, 2021
at 12:46 PM

Applicant

5-B-21-SC
Applicant Correspondence
May 2, 2021 at 11:05 PM

Per phone conversation with a planning commission representative on 4/30/21. I requested that a public pedestrian easement be added to the proposed street / right of way closure application.

Being the applicant for this proposal I thought this would eliminate confusion with access to the Greenway from neighboring residents. Basically described as a Beach Access between condos.

applicant

May 2, 2021
at 11:05 PM

Charles
37909

5-B-21-SC
Charles (37909), May 3, 2021 at 10:20 AM

Glenmore drive being a publicly accessible street allows my family and I to access the park without having to walk all the way down to the park entrance, along our street, which is a double-yellow line road with no sidewalks. We moved here 5 years ago specifically for the near park access without having to go through neighbor's yards, most of whom have constructed fences backing up to the park.

Removing public care and maintenance of this road will also undoubtedly result in its falling into disrepair given the nature of how it's already being used as boat and vehicle storage, about where there have already been multiple issues.

I sincerely hope this does not go through, and it would be both an inconvenience and a potential blight on the entire neighborhood.

May 3, 2021
at 10:20 AM

Megan
37909

5-B-21-SC
Megan (37909), May 3, 2021 at 8:53 PM

We moved to 8009 Bennington Drive four years ago; we love the West Hills neighborhood and we love being within walking distance of West Hills park. We have two small children and because Bennington Drive has alot of traffic, Glenmore Drive is our closest access to the park. We walk on this street several times a week to get to the playgrounds. I respectfully request that Glenmore Drive remain a public road. Thank you for your consideration.

May 3, 2021
at 8:53 PM

Joe
37909

5-B-21-SC
Joe (37909), May 5, 2021 at 2:12 PM

Please see attached.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210505141212.pdf

May 5, 2021
at 2:12 PM

Anita
37909

5-B-21-SC
Anita (37909), May 6, 2021 at 9:41 AM

Opposing Viewpoint
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210506094121.pdf

May 6, 2021
at 9:41 AM

Mark
37909

5-B-21-SC
Mark (37909), May 6, 2021 at 6:14 PM

As 20+ year residents of Bennington Dr, we strongly oppose the closure of the Glenmore Dr ROW. This ROW provides public access to the neighborhood's main park, and this public access is especially important in terms of safety considering there are no sidewalks on this section of Bennington Dr. It appears this closure is being sought as a remedy to address a fence and pool which were installed against city code. The closure of this public area and its conveyance to a private property owner at no cost is not a proper remedy to address the applicant's issues.

May 6, 2021
at 6:14 PM

Kelli
37909

5-B-21-SC
Kelli (37909), May 10, 2021 at 1:59 AM

The upkeep of this road is paid for with taxpayer money and exists for community use. Privatization would be detrimental for the neighborhood.

May 10, 2021
at 1:59 AM

Kacie
37909

5-B-21-SC
Kacie (37909), May 10, 2021 at 2:02 AM

This road is meant to be for public use of the community. The neighborhood pays for it so it should remain public.

May 10, 2021
at 2:02 AM

Leonore
37909

5-B-21-SC
Leonore (37909), May 10, 2021 at 10:02 AM

why would a street be closed so one person living on this street can build/complete a pool. what about the right of the other neighbors living on this street. just think of this and let justice be heard

May 10, 2021
at 10:02 AM

Kalyn
37914

5-B-21-SC
Kalyn (37914), May 10, 2021 at 11:52 AM

Has anyone who has commented on this gone to talk to the family that is trying to get this passed? Or is everyone listening to a third party that has pitted the entire street against a family they have never spoken with?

May 10, 2021
at 11:52 AM

Tim

5-B-21-SC
Tim May 10, 2021 at 5:15 PM

I live at 8008 Bennington Dr. and fully support the right of way closure referenced above. We see cars accessing the park and driving along the pipeline via this entrance. They will then drive and park by the pavilions for their parties. This is not only dangerous to my kids in the park, but to everyone who uses the park. We're in the park frequently walking our dog, running and riding bikes as a family. Closing this access point to the general public will funnel traffic and parking to either side of the park by West Hills Elementary school and the YMCA. Most of this happens on the weekends and nights.

We also see a lot of people drive through the West Hills neighborhood as it's a major cut through route from Middlebrook to Kingston Pike. We've had two rocking chairs stolen from our front porch. I'm for anything that will limit access to the park to only the two specific points with designated parking lots on either end of the greenway/park.

Cars park illegally on this side street all the time. I can see why it would be very frustrating to live in either of the houses on the side of this street with parked cars and people that are not West Hills residents accessing the park via their cars.

West Hills park is wonderful and we have wonderful neighbors, but it needs to be accessed correctly from either end of the park and without motorized vehicles.

May 10, 2021
at 5:15 PM

Melody
37909

5-B-21-SC
Melody (37909), May 10, 2021 at 6:17 PM

Opposed to the rezone of Glenmore Drive
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210510181728.pdf

May 10, 2021
at 6:17 PM

Richard
37909

5-B-21-SC
Richard (37909), May 11, 2021 at 6:09 AM

See Attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210511060951.pdf

May 11, 2021
at 6:09 AM

Christa
37909

5-B-21-SC
Christa (37909), May 11, 2021 at 10:36 AM

The Clark family's request for the street closure has less to do with their fence/pool and is actually more about addressing illegal parking and safety concerns related to the dead end street. I have been a guest in their home many times and deemed an honorary family member. I understand the concerns, issues and hardships the street has created for them and I would love to see it closed as well. As a resident of the West Hills community, I feel closing Glenmore Dr. would enhance the safety of the neighbors around the street while continuing to provide families with access to the park and greenway.

May 11, 2021
at 10:36 AM

Christa
37909

5-B-21-SC
Christa (37909), May 11, 2021 at 11:35 AM

May 11, 2021
at 11:35 AM

Christa
37909

5-B-21-SC
Christa (37909), May 11, 2021 at 11:40 AM

[ ] The Clark family's request for the street closure is about addressing illegal parking and safety concerns related to the dead end street. I understand the concerns, issues and hardships the street has created for them and I would love to see it closed as well. As a resident of the West Hills community, I feel closing Glenmore Dr. would enhance the safety of the neighbors around the street while continuing to provide families with access to the park and greenway.

May 11, 2021
at 11:40 AM

Christa
37909

5-B-21-SC
Christa (37909), May 11, 2021 at 11:44 AM

The request for the street closure is about addressing illegal parking and safety concerns related to the dead end street. I understand the concerns, issues and hardships the street has created and I would love to see it closed. As a resident of the West Hills community for 15 years, I feel closing it would enhance safty while continuing to provide families with access to the greenway.

May 11, 2021
at 11:44 AM

Caitlin
37909

5-B-21-SC
Caitlin (37909), May 11, 2021 at 10:06 PM

I am opposed to closing Glenmore Drive. Public access to the park is central to our enjoyment of our neighborhood and I do not believe closing this street is in the best interest of West Hills.

May 11, 2021
at 10:06 PM

Robert
37909

5-B-21-SC
Robert (37909), May 11, 2021 at 10:11 PM

I would like to see this road remain open for public/community use and not privatized on the backs of the good tax paying citizens who enjoy its use in an unfettered manner.

May 11, 2021
at 10:11 PM

Kenneth

5-B-21-SC
Kenneth May 12, 2021 at 8:40 AM

Attached are my comments in favor of the ROW Closure 5-B-21-SC.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210512084020.pdf

May 12, 2021
at 8:40 AM

Tim
37909

5-B-21-SC
Tim (37909), May 12, 2021 at 4:04 PM

We're for the closure of the road to vehicle traffic. This side street should only be for foot traffic (outside of the two homeowner driveways) and not used for a public access by people driving vehicles. People use this as an access point to drive vehicles into the park and down the pipeline right of way and to the pavilions in the park. West Hills park is very busy with families and it's simply a safety issue with everyone using the park running, walking and enjoying the grassy areas. Vehicles need to be blocked from going into the park from this access point and every access point from the fields to the parking lots. I'm on board with a compromise approach to limit this road to foot traffic only.

May 12, 2021
at 4:04 PM

Michael
37909

5-B-21-SC
Michael (37909), May 12, 2021 at 9:31 PM

I am opposed making this public road into a private drive. Keeping public access to the park is in the public’s best interest.

May 12, 2021
at 9:31 PM

Katie
37931

5-G-21-UR
Katie (37931), May 12, 2021 at 9:31 PM

Please see attachment.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210512213151.pdf

May 12, 2021
at 9:31 PM

Rachael
37909

5-B-21-SC
Rachael (37909), May 12, 2021 at 9:37 PM

As a Bennington Drive resident I feel it is in the best interest of the neighborhood to keep Glenmore drive open and am opposed to the rezoning of the street.

May 12, 2021
at 9:37 PM

Ken
37909

5-B-21-SC
Ken (37909), May 12, 2021 at 10:09 PM

Please see attachment.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210512220903.pdf

May 12, 2021
at 10:09 PM

Esther
37909

5-B-21-SC
Esther (37909), May 13, 2021 at 4:36 AM

The street should remain open to the public because it was created and maintained by tax payer funding. Residents of the other side of the street often cannot drive up their steep driveways safely in winter weather conditions and thus need to park on Glenmore. Street parking is not legal on Bennington Drive. Closing down streets would make this neighborhood less welcoming to present and future residents.

FYI, many direct conversations have happened between all of the involved households about this issue, so none of it should be a surprise.

May 13, 2021
at 4:36 AM

Aaron
37909

5-B-21-SC
Aaron (37909), May 13, 2021 at 8:24 AM

I support the road closure at Glenmore Drive. My property borders Glenmore Drive at 8000 Bennington. My reasoning comes down to safety. Every day, cars speed down the road causing safety issues for both my family as well as the Clark family. They are led by GPS navigation as an end-point to the park. Public access points to the park already exist, therefore, if the street is unnamed, navigation will correct to the proper destination waypoints. As I understand it, the city has recommended a public easement along the street to allow for foot traffic. This is a good compromise and should satisfy any issues regarding park access.

There is a street off Corteland Drive that leads to the West End Church of Christ. It is an unnamed street. Like ours, there are two homes along either side. What are the circumstances around that street? I’m sure there is a solution that would stop the vehicle traffic and make this road safer for my family, as well as those around me.

May 13, 2021
at 8:24 AM

6-I-21-UR

David
37931

6-I-21-UR
David (37931), May 17, 2021 at 9:41 AM

Please deny this request for outdoor self-storage. This company already built their 3- story indoor storage building (with 78 outdoor RV/boat parking spots) which is adjacent to this lot. See 6-D-19-UR. I can only hope the owner and the commission can find a better use of this plot.

May 17, 2021
at 9:41 AM

Lynda
37931

6-A-21-SP
Lynda (37931), May 20, 2021 at 2:48 PM

Traffic is already very bad on Ball Camp Pike and will get worse with the construction of the Schaad Road extension. The nearby existing intersections are already dangerous to pull out of. Rezoning this plot and the adjoining plot will result in making an already dangerous situation worse and I am afraid will result in bodily injury to someone or worse.

May 20, 2021
at 2:48 PM

Tyler
37931

5-G-21-UR
Tyler (37931), May 23, 2021 at 9:28 AM

Another storage facility in Cedar Bluff, specifically butted up against this highly residential area is a mistake. There is already an existing adjacent storage facility on the corner of Cedar Bluff Rd. and Middlebrook Pike. There is also another newer storage facility less than a mile up the road from this proposed location. Storage facilities typical diminish the general facade of an area, typically constructed as a concrete or metal box eye sore and there already seems to be plenty in this area. I don’t believe that a storage facility would help this community in any way, instead only infuriate the locals in this area. Please consider denying this request.

May 23, 2021
at 9:28 AM

Phillip

3-SB-21-C
Phillip May 24, 2021 at 2:09 PM

Thank you for your willingness to serve Knoxville and Knox County through your role on the planning commission! I am writing today in support of the proposed Innsbruck Farms development located in East Knox County off of Ruggles Ferry Pike.

I ask that you consider the drastic need and long-term benefits to Knox County from this project. In order to support a growing city/county and future job growth, there has to be large housing developments of all kinds (rural, suburban, urban, downtown, etc.) to sustain our future. All across the United States, housing demand is at an all time high. At the time of this email, there are only 361 active real estate listings for homes in all of Knox County. Development projects like this are crucial to combat the large housing need.

I have been on both sides of the aisle with development, as a concerned resident and as a property owner working to develop properties. I understand not wanting to see an area change or get developed, but individuals have to realize that it is only a matter of time before this currently underdeveloped part of our county starts receiving more and more proposed residential and commercial developments.

I have repeatedly heard the argument of the concerns of increased traffic on the adjoining roads surrounding this property and the associated safety. Sure some of the smaller roads will need widening and improvements, but how often is this not an issue with a new development. I am on Ruggles Ferry Pike often, which I feel can safely accommodate the increased traffic from this neighborhood at its peak. Oftentimes when driving on Ruggles Ferry Pike, you will only meet one or two cars on this long 6 mile road. In my opinion, this road is currently underutilized, considering the size and quality of this road.

Thank you for taking the time to read my email. I ask that you support this needed development project in Knox County.

May 24, 2021
at 2:09 PM

LaTesha
37924

5-H-21-UR
LaTesha (37924), May 24, 2021 at 8:59 PM

This doesn’t belong in the middle of our community. This location is way to close to our schools, senior center, library and ball fields. I’m concerned about the safety of our children in the community.

May 24, 2021
at 8:59 PM

Marian
37924

3-SB-21-C
Marian (37924), May 24, 2021 at 9:01 PM

Regarding the Innsbruck Farms proposed development:

I am emphatically Opposed to the amount of houses for this development!!!

I feel it would have a very negative impact on our community with regards to traffic, safety, environmental issues as well as diminishing the ‘rural living’ of so many who have enjoyed this area for years!!

May 24, 2021
at 9:01 PM

Tesha
37924

3-SB-21-C
Tesha (37924), May 24, 2021 at 9:12 PM

I’m against this development 100%. I’m concerned about the safety with adding that many houses to an already busy road. I don’t think our roads, schools or community would be able to grow that much that fast. Please don’t allow this to pass. I love my community as it is and very concerned with the changes that could come from this very large subdivision.

May 24, 2021
at 9:12 PM

VANESSA
37924

3-SB-21-C
VANESSA (37924), May 24, 2021 at 10:47 PM

My family has personally owned property on Ruggles Ferry since the turn of the century and before. My ancestors operated a small store as well as a dairy farm. As of this date, my husband and I own 35 acres on Ruggles Ferry. We have no intention of developing the property. It's history. We live in a subdivision in north Knoxville, that was sadly, once a vibrant farm. Enough is enough! There is no "planning" to this. Ruggles Ferry Rd is no where near prepared for the amount of the traffic that a subdivision of this size would bring. It's ridiculous! There is not even a decent grocery store in the area! The Food City on Ashville Hwy can in no way handle the volume of customers that a subdivision of that size would bring. Not to mention the size of the schools in the area. Unfortunately, it's all about money and greed. It was heartbreaking enough when I watched the Blake Farm become the golf course, but as it developed-I came to terms with it-beautiful houses, estate size lots and the golf course still has a "rural" feel/look to it. Fine-develop it to a degree-but 482 homes??!! No one in this area wants Ruggles Ferry/East Knox County to become the next Hardin Valley! Developers have been allowed to continue to develop beautiful farm property for urban sprawl with no regard to infrastructure! This is beautiful property backing up to the Holston River! Please save our peaceful community!

May 24, 2021
at 10:47 PM

Larry
37924

3-SB-21-C
Larry (37924), May 24, 2021 at 11:09 PM

The development of more than 400+ Homesites is not what our community needs. Currently, we suffer from poor service from KUB Electrical infrastructure. The approving committee needs to base their vote on the lack of infrastructure to support a development of this size. Many of the roads are narrow and are already strained during the golf season with traffic not yielding to proper traffic laws such as high speeds and passing along several long stretches with adjacent roads. For the best interest of North Ruggles Ferry Pike and its outlining roads, we would best benefit from fewer homes with 1 Acre lots to preserve the appearance of the rural area feel. We have enough poorly approved developments in Knox County with bottlenecks of getting to main roads.... A planning commission should be planning ahead prior to any approval of large development.

May 24, 2021
at 11:09 PM

Tony
37931

6-A-21-SP
Tony (37931), May 24, 2021 at 11:18 PM

Please see attachment
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210524231849.pdf

May 24, 2021
at 11:18 PM

Anne
37871

5-H-21-UR
Anne (37871), May 26, 2021 at 3:23 PM

I am very strongly opposed to this additional 40 bed rehab facility. It is within the Carter Elementary School District, within 1 mile of the Middle School and High School along with the Senior Citizens Facility, Library and softball fields used by children. The first 40 bed facility passed during a pandemic without anyone knowing what was going on. This has no place in our community.

May 26, 2021
at 3:23 PM

6-C-21-UR

Anita
37914

6-C-21-UR
Anita (37914), May 26, 2021 at 3:46 PM

I have attached my PDF file as required
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210526154618.pdf

May 26, 2021
at 3:46 PM

6-B-21-UR

Charles
37931

6-B-21-UR
Charles (37931), May 26, 2021 at 5:08 PM

If you are going to approve this development, there needs to be some consideration in changing/fixing the intersection at Ball Camp Pike and Bakertown Road. Currently, it is offset and is controlled only by 2 stop signs. Additionally, there is a railroad crossing to deal with. With the uptick in traffic and this horrible intersection, it is only a matter of time until tragedy strikes.

May 26, 2021
at 5:08 PM

DAVID
37931

6-A-21-SP
DAVID (37931), May 26, 2021 at 11:54 PM

The current planned zoning change for this area does not appear to be one that would benefit the community. The area is located on Ball Camp Pike which is already extremely congested with traffic flow, to only increase with the Shaad Rd extension project. The area in recent weeks has seen deadly motor vehicle accidents due to the level of congestion at Hitching Post and Daybreak Drive, along with the traffic that flows off of Middlebrook Pk. as well as traffic from Lovel Road. While I am sure the current land owner is interested in finding some use for the parcel of land that is currently not useable for any other purpose and can't be sold likely due to the Shaad Rd extension plan. I see no benefit. The area is already close to many restaurants and the hope of possible gaining business from either the local soccer crowd or the county park were concession are sold for the purpose of benefitting the youth sports leagues there seems like a poor choice of showing community support. I strongly urge the County Commission the reject the request for rezoning of this location.

May 26, 2021
at 11:54 PM

Billie
37871

5-H-21-UR
Billie (37871), May 27, 2021 at 7:19 AM

This is way too close to Carter Elementary School, 1 mile of the Library, Senior Citizens meeting facility, softball fields used by our kids, Carter Middle School and Carter High School. We have no way of knowing what type of criminals, drug users, sex offenders, etc. that will be housed in this facility. I am all for people finding help, but it is entirely too close to our children and has no place in that area.

May 27, 2021
at 7:19 AM

6-C-21-UR

Taylor
37914

6-C-21-UR
Taylor (37914), May 27, 2021 at 9:30 AM

Hello, my name is Taylor and I have been raised on this property for 13 years! The only view we have is of the field in front of our house. Everything surrounding us is trees except for the field. I love sitting on my front porch and listening to the birds and watching the squirrels and deer feed. If a subdivision is built in the field, everything nice that we have will be gone. I have a pitbull I let roam on our property. I will not be putting her on a leash when she goes outside. Also, people in subdivisions spray weed killer in their yards....the wind brings the spray over into OUR yard, killing anything the bees are attracted to, AND the bees! We have a garden, we need those pollinators in order to have a decent garden/grow!!!
This will destroy everything we have done over the years to have a decent food crop for years to come!! We have way too many memories in that field to just let this happen. On July 4th, we shoot off fireworks in the field. We use the field to lay and watch the stars at night. We look for shapes in the clouds... If anything, I would much rather a house ranch be built than a subdivision full of nosey neighbors. We live our here specifically to have our own peace. Please don't take that from us.

May 27, 2021
at 9:30 AM

Katy
37924

5-H-21-UR
Katy (37924), May 27, 2021 at 3:31 PM

It is unacceptable that the MPC votes in yet another large 40 bed drug rehab house in TWO MONTHS ! A large 40 bed facility has already been approved by the MPC Commissioners and is in operation right in the center of the Carter Community. Located in the basement of Drayers Physical Therapy. People are just now finding out about its approval & are shocked that it was approved across the HWY from Carter Elementary School. Within the 1000 foot safety zone. This community had no real chance to respond to this controversial use because they were in lock down during the pandemic .This is not wanted here and the people that are backing it knows that. Why is it being pushed so hard & so fast on our community?

May 27, 2021
at 3:31 PM

6-C-21-UR

Anita
37914

6-C-21-UR
Anita (37914), May 27, 2021 at 3:55 PM

One or two more comments:
I see this is for Urban Growth Development....so does this also mean the taxes will be raised or now included in the city property to collect more taxes??

This property also borders half of my driveway. Another big concern I have is people using my private drive as a "back gate" so to speak. Or trespassers coming onto my property without permission.

And there is the issue of people who live in subdivisions spraying for weed control, while I am trying to keep my pollinators around for my garden....that is a very big issue!! The winds will blow their spray right into my garden area.

May 27, 2021
at 3:55 PM

Ralph

5-H-21-UR
Ralph May 27, 2021 at 9:19 PM

I want to voice my concern and opposition to the approval of the drug rehab facility in the Carter Community.

May 27, 2021
at 9:19 PM

Erica

5-H-21-UR
Erica May 27, 2021 at 9:20 PM

I am reaching out to you in regards to the rezoning of 8535 Asheville Highway to accommodate Soul Savages drug rehab facility. First, I am not completely against this but not completely for it either. I am an experienced registered nurse with 16 years of experience, 10 of those years were spent in a nearby ER. During those 10 years I have resuscitated numerous of addicts and ministered to addicts.

I do believe the location of this facility is not ideal considering the close proximity to the schools, park, and residential areas. We already have addicts that wander the highway and exit 398 hotels. I have seen numerous first responders attending to drug overdoses in these areas. Along with this activity comes criminal activities.

I am also concerned this Jennifer Pitt has very little drug rehab management experience and the fact she’s a prior felon. Many of these drug rehab centers work off of donations which can be quite profitable, really that seems to be the real agenda to make money not rehab people.

We are often the forgotten part of Knox County, we are the last to experience tax payer dollars, we had to fight to get our new Carter Elementary school. We don’t have nice parks or even a community center. Please don’t put this drug rehab center in the heart of our community!

May 27, 2021
at 9:20 PM

Tracie

5-H-21-UR
Tracie May 27, 2021 at 9:21 PM

As a member of the Carter Community with both a child at the High School and a father who regularly attends the Carter Senior Center I am very concerned with the potential location of the new drug rehabilitation facility so close to the heart of our community. I understand and agree that people seeking drug rehabilitation need and deserve help from licensed clinical professionals in a secure facility. My concern is that the proposed area is so close to the elementary, middle and high schools, along with the Senior Center, ballfields, library, and pool/community park that it will be come a problem to our most vulnerable populations. Thank you for your time in addressing this concern.

May 27, 2021
at 9:21 PM

Community Resident

5-H-21-UR
Community Resident May 28, 2021 at 9:07 AM

Please reconsider this Rehab in our community. We have a great community that comes together for each other. Our community is totally against this. Please reconsider and try to find a new location.

May 28, 2021
at 9:07 AM

Darrel

5-H-21-UR
Darrel May 28, 2021 at 10:37 AM

I am contacting you concerning information regarding a drug addict reform bedding house located near Drayer physical therapy. My main concern is the proximity to the schools and the placement of this type of facility housing mentally unstable persons which poses a clear and present danger to our children and the community in general. This type of facility, although probably needed, does not have any place being located this close to our schools and children. Please consider my request to locate this facility at least several miles away from any schools.

May 28, 2021
at 10:37 AM

Paul & Denise

5-H-21-UR
Paul & Denise May 28, 2021 at 11:14 AM

As residents of the Carter Community, we are strongly against the Recovery House that is near many single-family residential properties, schools, etc.

May 28, 2021
at 11:14 AM

April

5-H-21-UR
April May 28, 2021 at 2:27 PM

My name is April Laymon I'm writing concerning the Rehab that is being talked about, coming to my community, The Carter Community. I have several concerns in that the letter I seen says that the lady purchasing the property and opening the rehab has no formal education in dealing with People who need such as a Rehab Facility, I would think someone would need a education in Sociology, Psychology, and also a Dr or RN degree for medical reasons , it has been said she's just a recovered addict and felon with no education or medical degree in such , I agree that we need a facility in our area like a Rehab, but believe a credible person should be considered for this, also I have concerns that she will be transporting felons, and people on probation, is she equipped to handle that? Will she have officers or guards? Will there be safety measures for travel, and also will sex offenders be able to be that close to our schools and community Ball parks etc. , that's just 1 and 1/2 miles away... that's not very far.. 7,920 feet from our Elementary school. I'm aware the TN law says only 1,000 feet are required for sex offenders but this is a small country town and we would like it to remain as safe as possible, and the paper I read says she will lock them up at night will she have the security required for that? I'm almost 41 and I grew up here , so did my parents, grandparents and great grandparents, this is our home and my wish is that it stays safe for future generations. If we wanted to live in the city towards Knoxville around these kinds of things we could have chosen to leave our community, we stayed here because its safer and lifetime citizens remain loyal and trustworthy and seems there's more people wanting to put an end to that. Also I would like to add my sister Jill was an addict and she passed away several years ago at 40, she was 13 years older than me . I've been through what drugs and addiction puts families through and seen what she put our family through when I was a teenager , I agree we need help in our community but am just concerned it's not being handled correctly. I feel like people want to bring more harm to our community by just letting anyone in... I hope you and whomever is in charge can reconsider or make some necessary judgments to make sure this is handled as safely as possible, in the mean time all we can do is pray and eventually look for a new home/ community if this non sense keeps going down here...

May 28, 2021
at 2:27 PM

Chris

5-H-21-UR
Chris May 28, 2021 at 3:16 PM

It would appear that there are forces in play to turn the carter community into a drug rehabilitation area.

There is much skepticism regarding the qualifications of the operator and liability in that young children are a simple walk away along with established housing.

I hope the planning commission will look hard into this matter and factor in the the most vulnerable of us into the equation.

Not to mention homeowners who will now have to worry what type of addict will be settled in their backyard.

I believe this is not the location for such a facility and the people in this community should have not have to worry about the security of their home or family.

Please help us find a better location for this type of "housing".

May 28, 2021
at 3:16 PM

Veronica

5-H-21-UR
Veronica May 28, 2021 at 4:51 PM

I wanted to reach out to say I object to the recovery house. Simply stated it is too close to our schools. I know and understand that these types of facilities are needed. My brother in law has required a recovery facility multiple times....and that's part of why I am objecting. He has been in and out of jail. In and out of facilities....and that is not something I feel comfortable having located so close to the schools that I work in and that my children attend.

Please help our community by voting no on the recovery house!

May 28, 2021
at 4:51 PM

Gordon
70454

5-H-21-UR
Gordon (70454), May 28, 2021 at 7:25 PM

I am for the recovery house to help those that need it to change their lives and become productive members of society. I would help sponsor some of these souls and if it wasn’t for places like this, I would not be where I am today.

May 28, 2021
at 7:25 PM

Jamie

5-H-21-UR
Jamie May 29, 2021 at 10:11 AM

I’m writing to express my great protest to increasing the number of beds to increase the rehab facility in the Carter 4 way in community. It appears the person making the application has no real experience and is a felon also. Nothing worse than putting the fox in charge of the hen house! If this was a honest go goodness rehab facility it might be different but it is not.

Please encourage the MPC to not bring this into our community and across from our elementary school?? Is anyone thinking about the possible repercussions of that?

We are all begging that this is not allowed. Bring us a decent restaurant or shopping Area. Something that will benefit our community not hurt us.

May 29, 2021
at 10:11 AM

William and Shirley

3-SB-21-C
William and Shirley May 30, 2021 at 12:38 PM

Twenty-one years ago we left the congestion and confines of a west Knox suburb to enjoy our haven on Ellijay Way. We have never missed the amenities of shopping, restaurants or entertainment venues because our current lifestyle fulfills our desires.

We live on small acreage where quiet prevails. In the morning, we listen to the calls of turkey. In the dark of night, we hear the mournful cry of coyotes. Big open skies provide a show of meteor showers, rainbows and constellations. The Holston River is our backyard where waterfowl and recreationist enjoy clean waters. We see beauty in hay bales nestled in open fields. Cattle graze openly in meadows. Agriculture is evident here.

The density of the Innsbruck Farms development will alter what we have protected and valued. We ask for oversight in protecting the waterway from pollution from the development of lawns. Eagles are making a comeback and a heron rookery exists a short distance away.

We ask for protection from noise and light pollution.

A serious traffic plan must be developed to safely control the four thousand cars that will be clogging our roadways.

The Carter Schools must be awarded building funds to handle the influx of students.

The destruction of wildlife habitat will permanently destroy how we coexist with valued wildlife.

We purposely chose this area of the county because it is not suburbia. That is what we left behind. Please help us protect what we love.

May 30, 2021
at 12:38 PM

Leona
37923

5-G-21-UR
Leona (37923), June 1, 2021 at 1:08 AM

This request needs to be denied and the land remains residential /rural!! There is a huge new storage facility within a few miles near the West Town Mall, in addition to another just a block down on the corner of Middlebrook and Cedar Bluff!! The requested use is not compatible with the character of the neighborhood where it is proposed. The lay of the land is rolling uphill which makes it impossible to not be an eyesore!! The storage units would be rising higher and higher up the hill as you drive by with no viable solution to remedy with fencing, shrubs, or trees. Right now there is a housing shortage and it makes more sense to build residential homes. For once, you should listen to what your residents who live in the area want and not what will bring in the most tax dollars. This is a residential neighborhood. Leave it that way!!

June 1, 2021
at 1:08 AM

Shana Beth
37923

5-G-21-UR
Shana Beth (37923), June 1, 2021 at 8:05 AM

We do not need additional storage facilities. We already have this available in the all directions of this site. This will add to an already overwhelmed traffic situation. It will not in any way add to the value of the property owners but will impact them negatively. Development is welcome when it add to the area in a positive way. This will not do that

June 1, 2021
at 8:05 AM

Edmond

5-G-21-UR
Edmond June 1, 2021 at 8:08 AM

I oppose building another storage unit in the Cedar Bluff/Middle Brook Pike area. We have enough of those facilities in the area and I fear it will degrade the property values in the area.

June 1, 2021
at 8:08 AM

Sharon
37923

5-G-21-UR
Sharon (37923), June 1, 2021 at 8:52 AM

I don’t think we need a third storage facility within a few miles of each other. This new faculty would be across the street from an exciting facility.

We need residential area not more commercial.

June 1, 2021
at 8:52 AM

Steven
37932

5-G-21-UR
Steven (37932), June 1, 2021 at 9:31 AM

I am a member of Grace Lutheran Church located just up the street from this planned facility and I must agree that a storage facility in this area is not in keeping with the aesthetic value of the neighborhood. Unlike other commercial business outdoor storage facilities are not aesthetically pleasing and more of an eyesore. Fencing for security is usually chain link and ugly, and garbage and the like builds up against it with proprietors not servicing and cleaning the area enough. Again, our church is up the street from this eyesore which adds no apartments, homes, or condominiums that Grace can support for spiritual needs. Again this is a thriving neighborly community of which an outdoor facility like the one proposed detracts from those that live or have a vested interest in the area. Please vote "No" on this proposal.

June 1, 2021
at 9:31 AM

Diane
37923

5-G-21-UR
Diane (37923), June 1, 2021 at 10:06 AM

PLEASE do not allow this storage facility to be built in this neighborhood vicinity. We have had so many problems and trouble already in our neighborhoods and this would add to the demise. We already have a storage facility across and down the trees from there which devaluations our properties and additional traffic, vagrancy and an eyesore for the neighborhood.

I appreciate your attention to this matter that will affect many citizens/voters.

June 1, 2021
at 10:06 AM

Chris
37923

5-G-21-UR
Chris (37923), June 1, 2021 at 11:31 AM

I would like to voice my opinion against the building of such a storage facility at this location on Middlebrook Pike as there are two such storage facilities within close proximity to the lot of the proposed additional unit. The first is less than a mile away, just across the street behind Bruster's Ice Cream (in the triangular island of business between Middlebrook Pike, Cedar Bluff Rd and Old Cedar Bluff Rd); the second sits 1-2 miles east of the empty lot, at the T-intersection formed by Middlebrook Pike and Joe Hinton Rd. An additional facility is superfluous and will add unnecessary traffic and crime risk to the area.

June 1, 2021
at 11:31 AM

BRENDA
37931

5-G-21-UR
BRENDA (37931), June 1, 2021 at 2:38 PM

With all due respect, this request needs to be denied and the land should zoned as remain residential /rural. There is no need for another storage facility. Has a business plan been completed for the proposed facility?
There are other new storage facilities in close proximity, e.g., VERY large one near West Town Mall, another VERY large one at the corner of Middlebrook Pike and Jo Hinton Rd (just about a mile from the location of the proposed facility), and a smaller one at the corner of Middlebrook Pike and Cedar Bluff Road. We DO NOT need another storage facility in this area.

The requested use is not compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhoods where it is proposed. The lay of the land is rolling uphill which makes it impossible to not be a large, overbearing structure. The storage units would probably rise high above the road and neighborhoods and the topography would not allow a viable solution for screening with fencing, shrubs or trees.

June 1, 2021
at 2:38 PM

Shauna
37931

5-G-21-UR
Shauna (37931), June 1, 2021 at 3:48 PM

Too many storage facilities look junky and lower property values. They also can bring crime.

June 1, 2021
at 3:48 PM

Kendra
37923

5-G-21-UR
Kendra (37923), June 2, 2021 at 11:16 AM

I am NOT in favor of another storage facility in this location. There are multiple other storage facilities within a couple miles in either direction. This is not the best use of this property.

June 2, 2021
at 11:16 AM

Charles
37934

5-G-21-UR
Charles (37934), June 2, 2021 at 3:58 PM

This looks like a good use of the land. I strongly support.

June 2, 2021
at 3:58 PM

Mike
37922

5-H-21-UR
Mike (37922), June 2, 2021 at 8:09 PM

I urge you to vote no or delay the vote on the proposed 40 bed drug rehab facility at 8537 Asheville Highway. The residence of the Carter Community do not want this in their neighborhood. Listen to their concerns before moving forward.

June 2, 2021
at 8:09 PM

6-I-21-UR

Robert
37931

6-I-21-UR
Robert (37931), June 3, 2021 at 10:51 AM

Please deny this request for additional self-storage. This developer is already building a massive 3-story indoor self-storage facility with plenty of additional outdoor parking areas in the adjacent lot, refer to 6-D-19-UR. Please consider a better use for this land between Beaver Ridge and Oak Ridge Highway.

June 3, 2021
at 10:51 AM

Ronald
37871

5-H-21-UR
Ronald (37871), June 3, 2021 at 7:03 PM

Concerned citizen of carter Community, wish to express my concern for this drug rehab center. For one, it is directly across the street from a bar. Second, it is with-in less than 1/2 mile from the Elementary School. Not to mention our churches close by.

June 3, 2021
at 7:03 PM

Al
37932

5-G-21-UR
Al (37932), June 3, 2021 at 7:48 PM

There are several storage unit facilities within a short distance from the proposed development. The area is well served with this sort of facility. In addition, a storage facility, by its nature, tends to be "industrial" in both appearance and in attracting homeless persons as well as criminal elements. This facility will detract from the quality appearance of this residential area.

June 3, 2021
at 7:48 PM

Herb
37871

5-H-21-UR
Herb (37871), June 3, 2021 at 11:23 PM

Please do not allow this request to move forward. This facility should be on an area that has public transportation and other conveniences for the residents of these recovery centers. How will the residents get to shopping, jobs, doctors appointments, etc. This is not a good fit for the residents or the community.

June 3, 2021
at 11:23 PM

Jennifer

6-F-21-UR
Jennifer June 4, 2021 at 8:22 AM

I am against the planned rezoning from PR to Commercial. This is a residential neighborhood, and we do not need a Dollar General on this corner. There is currently one located less than two miles from this new location. A brand new one just opened up on Cedar Lane, also just two miles away. Keep the businesses in the commercial district and don’t make a residential district commercial.

Put a home there. Not a Dollar General.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210604082225.pdf

June 4, 2021
at 8:22 AM

Pam and Gene

6-F-21-UR
Pam and Gene June 4, 2021 at 10:24 AM

We don't need another dollar general in this area. We have one a mile down the road. I can’t imagine the traffic this would create on Dry Gap. There is already danger lurking with the sheer drop off on the road.

June 4, 2021
at 10:24 AM

6-E-21-RZ

Kim
37932

6-E-21-RZ
Kim (37932), June 4, 2021 at 10:39 AM

On behalf of Hardin Valley Planning Advocates, I would like to offer support of the staff recommendations of Rural Residential / HP and Planned Residential up to 1.6 du / acres for this parcel. We ask that this body consider upholding these recommendations based on the following:

1. The Rural Residential land use classification allows consideration of additional residential density at this
location up to 2 dwelling units per acre and the majority of the surrounding residential densities are within that range as well.
2. The slope analysis for the property also recommends a reduced density up to 1.6 du/ac. Storm water issues continue to be a concern in this area.
3. 1.6 du/acre aligns with existing development.
4. Consideration to the additional impact of overcapacity student enrollment numbers. One single student contributes to the overcapacity number. The number of students cushioned by the construction of the new Northwest Elementary School is less than the current over capacity enrollment.
5. Consideration of proposed TVA routes should be noted.

June 4, 2021
at 10:39 AM

Kelley

6-F-21-UR
Kelley June 4, 2021 at 10:52 AM

Please do not allow this to happen. Please do not place a DISCOUNT RETAILER in the middle of a nice neighborhood. This will slowly in the long run lower the value of all of the homes, which will result in less property taxes for the County. Discount retailer = discount homes. In North Knox and East Knox in general there should remain some nice neighborhoods that are not associated with discount retailers and the association that comes along with that. If someone tried to place a Dollar General in a neighborhood in Farragut it would never happen.

June 4, 2021
at 10:52 AM

Amy

6-F-21-UR
Amy June 4, 2021 at 10:54 AM

June 4, 2021
at 10:54 AM

Amy

6-F-21-UR
Amy June 4, 2021 at 11:07 AM

There is plenty of Knox County residential area circled in the attached image with no Dollar Generals. Why are there none there? See attached image
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210604110709.pdf

June 4, 2021
at 11:07 AM

Jared

6-F-21-UR
Jared June 4, 2021 at 11:15 AM

I’m a resident at Sterchi Hills and just heard about a Dollar General being developed around the neighborhood. I can confidently say no one in this neighborhood wants this store built. We have a Dollar General Market just down the road from the subdivision and have no need for the store.

My primary concern is the rise in burglaries in the neighborhood. My truck was stolen out of my driveway earlier this year and people regularly report burglaries. It is most likely from the motels down the road off the interstate. My concern is that a Dollar General in that area will encourage people without cars who are staying at the motels to walk to the store and realize our subdivision is within walking distance and burglarize the subdivision. This has become a serious issue in the neighborhood and this store is a step in the wrong direction. I will be extremely disappointed in our county leadership if this goes through and hope you will reconsider.

June 4, 2021
at 11:15 AM

Melissa

6-F-21-UR
Melissa June 4, 2021 at 11:39 AM

It is my understanding that there is an upcoming commission meeting regarding a potential Dollar General store on Dry Gap adjacent to Sterchi Hills subdivision. As a 17 year resident of Sterchi Hills, I strongly oppose approval of this store/commercial building being located adjacent to our subdivision. Traffic is already saturated enough without adding a store in a residential zone and it’s impending traffic. In addition, there are two other Dollar General stores within a five minute drive of this proposed store location. I urge you to not approve this construction.

June 4, 2021
at 11:39 AM

Alan

6-F-21-UR
Alan June 4, 2021 at 1:34 PM

I strongly oppose the planning of erecting a new Dollar General Store next to our subdivision, it will cause more traffic and certainly affect our peaceful quality of life that we have been having here for 20 years. You have a store 1.5 miles away already and there should not be a need for another location that close. I hope this will be considered before moving forward. I would think you could find another location other than next to a subdivision especially to decrease the value of my home! Thank you, Alan Clemmer

June 4, 2021
at 1:34 PM

Christine

6-F-21-UR
Christine June 4, 2021 at 1:38 PM

I would like to ask that it not be approved for a Dollar General to be built at the corner of Dry Gap and Fountain City Road. As a resident of Sterchi Hills, I am concerned with the amount of crime it could bring to the area. Much of the crime around Knoxville in the past year has taken place in the parking lots of Dollar General stores—I am concerned that this trend will continue if one is built near our neighborhood and could bring crime into our neighborhood. With the spike in crime in Knoxville over the past year, we already have enough to worry about without inviting crime into the area. We already have a Dollar General market close by and have no need for a Dollar General store in this location. Thank you for your consideration.

June 4, 2021
at 1:38 PM

Roy
37924

5-H-21-UR
Roy (37924), June 4, 2021 at 3:19 PM

I am Against this Drug Rehab being in this Neighborhood and being just across the road from Carter Elementary School. I also have a Business just down the Road and do not need all of the Drug People in this area of the Community. This needs to be Stopped and put somewhere else besides this close to a Elementary School. You need to use common Sense and see how Dangerous this can be for the Kids at Carter Elementary. I for One Am Totally Against This. So Thanks For Your Time. I have Lived here all of My Lifetime and am 62 Years Old and Do Not Want this to be Allowed.

June 4, 2021
at 3:19 PM

Grace
37918

6-F-21-UR
Grace (37918), June 4, 2021 at 3:49 PM

Please don't. Just don't. Dry Gap Pike is dangerous enough as it is. They keep adding more subdivisions on Dry Gap and now this. The semi trucks and school buses are enough on this 2 lane road. Dry Gap is a death trap as it is. This development would only add to it and make my property value drop even further. Dollar General is notorious for drawing undesirables. The neighborhood is bad enough as it is. No one wants this here. No one. I speak for myself & my neighbor who would be living across the street from it. How about widening the road like you guys said you were going to do & put those sidewalks in before someone gets killed? Do something with the looming timber down Dry Gap before more semi trucks take out more branches? I didn't buy a house next to a grocery store. I don't want a house next to a grocery store. I keep getting inquiries about selling my house. Are they wanting to make all this commercial? Please don't add to the already overload of traffic here. I can't get out of my driveway safely as it is.

No to Dollar General. Thank you for your time.

June 4, 2021
at 3:49 PM

Kellie
37934

5-G-21-UR
Kellie (37934), June 4, 2021 at 5:08 PM

I utilize this area quite a bit and my family owns several homes in this area. I do not think this is a good use of this property. There are approximately 17 of these facilities within a 5 mile driving distance of this location. I called multiple of these properties and all had vacancies of every size they offered. We as a community definitely are seeing a need for more homes, this area is designated residential. Please do not change this zoning and allow this.

June 4, 2021
at 5:08 PM

Brenda
3791

6-F-21-UR
Brenda ( 3791), June 4, 2021 at 6:13 PM

Regarding the proposed Dollar Store......locating it at this intersection is a bad idea . This is not a commercial area..it is residential. In addition there is a church right behind the property and the Tommy Schumpert recreational park and Sterchi Hill greenway is nearby. The Dollar store will put more traffic onto Fountain City Road. Walkers, runners,bikers cross this road every day on the greenway.. I’m one of them and we have to be extremely careful when crossing Fountain City road as it is. More traffic would make it really dangerous. In addition it’s a simple decision ..this is not a commercial area. There are other appropriate commercial areas where this could be placed.

June 4, 2021
at 6:13 PM

Stacey
37918

6-F-21-UR
Stacey (37918), June 4, 2021 at 8:17 PM

As a resident of Sterchi Hills Subdivision I am strongly against the proposed Dollar General Store location at the corner of Dry Gap and Fountain City Road. This is a residential area with multiple subdivisions and neighborhoods and there should not be a commercially-zoned lot right in the middle of it. Sterchi Hills, Sterchi Village, and all other surrounding subdivisions have quick and easy access to Merchant’s Road, Clinton Hwy, and Emory Road and therefore easy access to other nearby Dollar General Stores. There is no need for a Dollar General Store smack in the middle of this neighborhood.

I also feel like the additional traffic it would bring is unwanted and pulling in and out of Dry Gap and/or Fountain City Road proposes a much higher risk for traffic accidents.

I think having a store at that location will hurt property values as well. It would make our neighborhood much less attractive and therefor less desirable.

I hope my comments are taken into consideration along with other residents’ input. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

June 4, 2021
at 8:17 PM

Kelley
37918

6-F-21-UR
Kelley (37918), June 4, 2021 at 8:43 PM

I am resident of Sterchi Village subdivision and I strongly oppose approval of commercial zoning and business at this location. The surrounding roads cannot accommodate more traffic, two nearby intersections already have frequent accidents, it would decrease the value of the homes nearby, and there are several Dollar General stores within a few mile radius.

June 4, 2021
at 8:43 PM

Linda
37918

6-F-21-UR
Linda (37918), June 4, 2021 at 9:20 PM

Our lovely community is seconds from all sorts of shopping and dining conveniences, and honestly, is there a need for one more Dollar General in East TN? I’ve never been near or in one that had the clientele that represents our neighborhood. I’ve remained a resident of Sterchi Hills since 1998, owning 2 homes during this time and one of the awesome perks of living here is is the lack of commercial properties connecting to our neighborhood. Please no commercial properties on the corner of Dry Gap and Dante.

June 4, 2021
at 9:20 PM

Jeff
37918

6-F-21-UR
Jeff (37918), June 5, 2021 at 4:33 PM

The Sterchi Hills Home Owners Association would like to express our clear and overwhelming opposition to the proposed Dollar General store @ Dry Gap/Fountain City Rd. In a poll conducted online of our residents asking for a vote of in favor or opposition of this project, at last count the numbers were 105 against and 9 for with at least 2 of the in favor of votes coming from non-residents of Sterchi Hills.

We have more than enough traffic on Dry Gap and Dante as it is without adding additional traffic because of this project. Our subdivision already is dealing with individuals coming into the neighborhood from surrounding areas, in particular two less than desirable hotels located at Dante/Central and Callahan/I-75 stealing and vandalizing our properties. Dollar General, operating as a discount store could possibly draw even more of those types of individuals who while traveling to the proposed store swing through our neighborhood in hopes of getting an even better deal........free.

Lastly there are six stores operating as either a Dollar General, Dollar Tree or Dollar General Market all within 5.0 miles of Sterchi Hills and Sterchi Village. We clearly do not need another one and more importantly we do not need the additional traffic this proposed store will bring and then if the store is not a success and I can assure you no one from our neighborhood will being doing business there, we are stuck with a large vacant building.

We ask that this proposal be rejected.

June 5, 2021
at 4:33 PM

Karen
37918

6-F-21-UR
Karen (37918), June 6, 2021 at 2:19 PM

There are currently 6 stores of this same type within a 5 to 6 mile radius of this planned location. The planned location is not suited for commercial traffic. Due to the potential for increased crime and the negative impact on the surrounding area I hope this plan does not come to fruition.

June 6, 2021
at 2:19 PM

4-M-21-RZ

Kevin
37918

4-M-21-RZ
Kevin (37918), June 6, 2021 at 8:14 PM

KCPA has looked at this rezoning and asks that you consider the following issues during the rezoning, and look at what can be done to mitigate impacts about:

- noise during evening hours - this will be a 24 hour facility, and it is adjacent to residential uses.

- Site Lighting should be shielded and low enough in height that the allowable spillage does not impact adjacent properties

- landscape shielding along the perimeter of the development

- traffic on Keck Rd and how the residents would be impacted with a road closure.

June 6, 2021
at 8:14 PM

Kevin
37918

5-G-21-RZ
Kevin (37918), June 6, 2021 at 8:26 PM

I support the staff recommendation of 3 units per acre for the rezoning; 5 units is not consistent with the Growth Plan, General Plan, or the adjacent larger subdivisions.

I note that this would be an excellent small timber stand - a productive use of land. If we had a Transfer of Development rights program in place, perhaps a builder of a subdivision on Murphy Rd could have bought the development rights to this property, allowing denser (i.e. the desired more profitable) development on some land, and leaving this land as undeveloped land. Please consider recommending a Transfer of Development Rights program to Knox County Commission.

June 6, 2021
at 8:26 PM

6-C-21-SP

Kevin
37918

6-C-21-SP
Kevin (37918), June 6, 2021 at 8:34 PM

KCPA supports the staff recommendation to deny the requested sector plan amendment to CA. The other corners of this intersection are all NC. KCPA does not support the extension of the GC sector plan more than absolutely necessary. Neighborhood Commercial land use designations offer several zoning options for the applicant, particularly the CN (Neighborhood Commercial) ZONE which would align with the other 3 corners of the Rutledge Pike / Roberts Rd intersection.

June 6, 2021
at 8:34 PM

6-G-21-RZ

Kevin
37918

6-G-21-RZ
Kevin (37918), June 6, 2021 at 8:41 PM

KCPA supports the recommendation to deny the requested CA zone. That zoning designation is very broad with its allowed, does not have sufficient landscape requirements to buffer it from adjacent residential uses, nor does it contain lighting requirements, and the signage requirements are... skimpy. KCPA could support a CN (Neighborhood Commercial) zone which would align it with the other 3 corners of Roberts Rd, but we do not support a CA zone. We ask that you support the sector plan land use designation chart and the staff recommendation.

June 6, 2021
at 8:41 PM

Kevin
37918

5-H-21-UR
Kevin (37918), June 6, 2021 at 9:18 PM

See attached letter. KCPA urges postponement until all of the information required to meet the conditions of 4.105 has been submitted.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210606211811.pdf

June 6, 2021
at 9:18 PM

Kevin
37918

6-F-21-UR
Kevin (37918), June 6, 2021 at 10:05 PM

See attached letter. Urge commission to make sign externally lit, to add conditions that the exterior of the building match the Exterior View submitted in the application.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210606220531.pdf

June 6, 2021
at 10:05 PM

6-B-21-SP

Chris
37932

6-B-21-SP
Chris (37932), June 7, 2021 at 8:45 AM

Please do not approve any additional building of neighborhoods. The roads and schools are overloaded already. If you are going to continue to approve these neighborhoods then force the developers to builder wider roads and add buildings to the schools. Other places in the US does this so it is not uncommon. The developers can pool their resources and accomplish this. It is crazy to me that neighborhood after neighborhood is approved without forcing the developers to improve the roads and schools.

June 7, 2021
at 8:45 AM

6-E-21-RZ

Alisandra

6-E-21-RZ
Alisandra June 7, 2021 at 10:12 AM

Please give strong consideration to the study by CDM Smith and the recommendation on page 21 concerning the critical improvements needed to Hardin Valley Road. As many of us have already stated, "You cannot backfit infrastructure."

"Hardin Valley Road, east of the site, should be improved to a 4-lane divided or 5-lane arterial from Pellissippi Parkway to west of Campbell Station Road where it might transition to a 3- lane arterial to west of Marietta Church Road. A 3-lane section may accommodate traffic at a LOS E with the 2025 traffic condition but may also need to be improved to a multi-lane arterial as development continues to occur along the Hardin Valley Road corridor."

Those of us who are living through today's heavy traffic (and I mean heavy in both numbers and type of traffic) understand that the chance of improvement is somewhere between slim and none, but we HOPE someone on the Knox County Commission will read the CDM Smith study and begin to move toward infrastructure improvement.

June 7, 2021
at 10:12 AM

Applicant

5-G-21-RZ
Applicant Correspondence
June 7, 2021 at 11:23 AM

Applicant Correspondence. Please see attached on behalf of the Applicant
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210607112348.pdf

applicant

June 7, 2021
at 11:23 AM

Brian
37918

6-F-21-UR
Brian (37918), June 7, 2021 at 1:02 PM

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210607130207.pdf

June 7, 2021
at 1:02 PM

Christopher
37918

6-F-21-UR
Christopher (37918), June 7, 2021 at 1:03 PM

I wish to strongly oppose the building of a Dollar General on Dry Gap Road. From what I can tell, this will violate ordinance 3.90.02, Section D: No illuminated sign shall be permitted within three hundred feet of property zoned RA, Low Density Residential, RAE, Exclusive Residential, PR, Planned Residential, RB, General Residential..... unless such sign is so designed that it does not shine or reflect its own illumination rays onto such property. With residential properties within half that distance, see no way they can have any illuminated sign that would not shine on residential properties. I don't think anyone would like to have a bright green and yellow sign that close to their house, shining in their bedroom window. I did not see the ordinance for parking lot lights, but these would end up being just as bright, in not brighter, and being elevated, would shine even worse across fences and into people's yards/houses. There are no street lights in this area, so it is quite dark at night. With the addition of business lighting, it will be quite a noticeable distraction to residents.

June 7, 2021
at 1:03 PM

Area Petition
37931

6-A-21-SP
Area Petition (37931), June 7, 2021 at 1:13 PM

Please see attached letter and signatures of 34 residents in the immediate area that oppose the rezoning of this property.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210607131302.pdf

June 7, 2021
at 1:13 PM

P
37918

6-F-21-UR
P (37918), June 7, 2021 at 1:32 PM

I respectively ask that this area not be developed into a commercial zone for the following reasons:

1. This is a mostly quiet, mainly residential area. Developing a commercial building will add to traffic noise, as well as increase in public annoyances.
2. The intersection is already a hazard and adding more traffic will only increase this problem.
3. The neighborhoods, housing values, etc will be decreased substantially with this development. This will cause our neighborhood to go "downhill" very quickly in terms of quality and desire to live here.
4. There is a relatively new Dollar General just over on Merchants Drive that is easily accessible and in a commercial/non residential area - suitable.
5. There is a Dollar General Market just over on Emory - again easily accessible and in a commercial/nonresidential area.
There is no need for another one between the 2 already existing stores.

Again, there is no reason for this addition and it will substantially negatively impact our desirable neighborhood. We petition the county to NOT develop this area into an unnecessary commercial land.

June 7, 2021
at 1:32 PM

Kevin
37918

5-G-21-UR
Kevin (37918), June 7, 2021 at 2:04 PM

Please see attached. I request that staff and commission consider adding conditions that for sides facing and visible from adjacent residences, house-side shields be required for free-standing luminaires and that the building material beneath wall scones be a non-reflective, dark material to reduce or eliminate the glare from the wall scone cast the wall.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210607140400.pdf

June 7, 2021
at 2:04 PM

Crystal
37918

5-G-21-RZ
Crystal (37918), June 7, 2021 at 3:07 PM

I would support the planning commissions recommendation of 3 units/acre as opposed to the 5 units/acre. Hopefully, this would allow us to keep some of the undeveloped agriculture land and trees behind our homes on Prairie Clover Lane. We have already had some drainage issues and removal of the trees and brush behind our homes may pose additional drainage issues for not only us, but also any new residential build on old Tazewell.

June 7, 2021
at 3:07 PM

Robert
37820

5-H-21-UR
Robert (37820), June 7, 2021 at 3:24 PM

It appears as the property manager, you are taking considerations from non- community members what should happen to property that has been owned by the family since the 1940’s. Wilma has been on that property since her birth (1947) in either a residential or a small business owner. She agree to lease it to Jennifer and the ministry because the community needs that type of help.

Tim Grigsby, Kevin Murphy and every other objector resides outside the zone and community impacted, but would see benefit from it. The lies and mis-information they are spreading, slanderous comments towards my Mother-in-law (deceased) the property owner and myself, and then and private information that was given to them by the planning office has be blast illegally out in a harassment manner.

Your team has pushed this and pushed it out, in trying to drive a negative impact to this tenant, who has jumped through every hoop you put in front of them. We have been abused by the team there for someone’s that is not part of the property or property’s interest.

I would be appreciated that you review the valid information, and leave Mr. Murphy to worry about Amazon and not 8535 Asheville Hwy.

June 7, 2021
at 3:24 PM

Alison
37918

6-F-21-UR
Alison (37918), June 7, 2021 at 3:40 PM

The proposed Dollar General is out of place in the proposed area and has the probability of increasing crime in the nearby neighborhoods. The Sterchi Hills subdivision has been having a significant increase in property theft recently and increased "shoppers" traffic can only add to the problem. There is already a problem with people walking along Dante Rd in the area stretching from Central Avenue Pike to the Health Dept. where sidewalks are lacking. Having a Dollar General a short distance away from the budget motel will be an incentive to walk a bit further along the road where drivers are going faster and the risks to all is higher. There are already three (3) Dollar General locations within four (4) miles of the proposed location. The proposed location is not near a bus route so is not needed by those without transportation so any of the other locations will suffice.

I am asking you to reconsider location a Dollar General at the corner of Dry Gap Pike and Dante Road.

June 7, 2021
at 3:40 PM

Kim
37918

6-F-21-UR
Kim (37918), June 7, 2021 at 3:55 PM

I am commenting to oppose the building of a Dollar General at Dry Gap and Fountain City Rd. Our community does not want this. There is one on Merchants Rd as well as Emory. Our neighborhood is already seeing more issues with the motels and Weigels at the other end of Dante. I personally don't want any increase of traffic for Dante Rd let alone more foot traffic. Reconsider your plans and keep our neighborhood quiet and safe.

June 7, 2021
at 3:55 PM

Gracie
37918

6-F-21-UR
Gracie (37918), June 7, 2021 at 4:15 PM

Are there plans to widen/straighten Dry Gap Pike BEFORE building the store? That is such a dangerous part of the road. Adding turning traffic both in and out of the store parking lot without the necessary road work ensures there will be numerous accidents.

My husband and I do not support this store.

June 7, 2021
at 4:15 PM

Franklin
37918

6-F-21-UR
Franklin (37918), June 7, 2021 at 4:27 PM

I live in Phase 3 of Sterchi Hills, and I am a part of the HOA

Please do not allow Dollar General to build a store on Dry Gap Pike, where Dante Road and Fountain City Road meet. This will put more traffic on all three of these roads, and all of these roads do not need the increased traffic. Plus, I fear the building of the store will lower home values in our subdivision.

June 7, 2021
at 4:27 PM

James
37914

5-H-21-UR
James (37914), June 7, 2021 at 10:22 PM

4.105.01. Minimum requirements.A. The facility shall be located, so that they are not within one thousand three hundred twenty (1,320) feet of another "recovery housing" facility;

The 8535 & 8537 properties are two separate properties. They have two separate buildings and have paid separate taxes for dozens of years. This is a clear violation of the zoning ordinance to consider two of them as one. That is why we have the zoning laws to protect the taxpayers. To say that the MPC will use their "administrative judgment " to bypass the zoning requirement to force a large drug recovery house on a community that does not want it is just wrong on so many levels. Wilma tore down Cardin's and left this community behind. Robert doesn't live in this community. They are not concerned about the little children at the elementary school right across the highway. Shame. Shame. Shame.

The soul savages ARE SAYING that they are buying that 8535 property from Robert, not leasing it. This is not about helping the community. This is just about making money.

June 7, 2021
at 10:22 PM

Richard
37909

5-B-21-SC
Richard (37909), June 8, 2021 at 4:08 AM

To all residents that had concerns about safety and how would the police respond if Glenmore Dr. was made private property between the 7916 and 8000 Bennington Dr. residents. The answer is no response if kept public. It is one of the lowest priority calls that can be made. A parking issue in a NO PARKING TOW AWAY ZONE.

Latest incident is attached
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608040834.pdf

June 8, 2021
at 4:08 AM

Kandy
37918

6-F-21-UR
Kandy (37918), June 8, 2021 at 7:27 AM

I have been a resident in Sterchi Hills subdivision for the last 20 years. I do not see any benefit to our community in having a Dollar General store placed in the proposed location. I do not know any residents in our community that DO want it. We have access to plenty of shopping options without having one in our backyard. I am against the placement of a Dollar General at this location.

June 8, 2021
at 7:27 AM

Vanessa
37918

6-F-21-UR
Vanessa (37918), June 8, 2021 at 8:05 AM

As a parent who already worries about the amount of traffic in our neighborhood, I do not want the Dollar General built directly across the street from where my children play. This will add to the amount of traffic we already have. We also have two different Dollar General stores with in two miles. Those are the only two I pass there could be more. This is a residential area, not a commercial area. Bringing in this business is only going to allow more businesses to come in. That will affect the amount of traffic and the crime rate of our area. I also fear that having a business that close to my home is going to affect to value of it. This is not something I want to deal with when going to sell my house. Please do not allow this business or any other business to go into this area.

June 8, 2021
at 8:05 AM

Blake
37918

6-F-21-UR
Blake (37918), June 8, 2021 at 8:42 AM

I am not in favor of a Dollar General Store being built on Dry Gap Rd across from Sterchi Hills neighborhood. I feel it will become a negative impact on the community and we have another Dollar General less than 5 minutes away. I feel like the proposed store will increase foot traffic and allow loitering, as well as add unneeded vehicle traffic to that intersection.

June 8, 2021
at 8:42 AM

Applicant

6-F-21-UR
Applicant Correspondence
June 8, 2021 at 8:57 AM

APPLICANT CORRESPONDENCE
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608085708.pdf

applicant

June 8, 2021
at 8:57 AM

Julie
37918

6-F-21-UR
Julie (37918), June 8, 2021 at 9:29 AM

There is a Dollar General store that is being planned for our area. It is across the street from our subdivision. Our subdivision is experience being a huge influx of crime and drug related break-ins. Several people from the hotel at Central and Callahan walk up this way and steal and go through our private property and cars. Adding a dollar general will only encourage more of that type of traffic and more illegal activity. Additionally the road cannot handle more traffic as it is already very and safe with many ignoring the red light at that intersection. Having large delivery trucks come through a residential area where many children are is not only unsafe but is a disruption to the peace and quiet of the community. I do not support a dollar general store in this area. Especially given there are two within a couple of miles from this area already.

June 8, 2021
at 9:29 AM

6-D-21-UR

Applicant

6-D-21-UR
Applicant Correspondence
June 8, 2021 at 9:39 AM

Correspondence on behalf of the applicant.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608093955.pdf

applicant

June 8, 2021
at 9:39 AM

Gregg
37924

5-H-21-UR
Gregg (37924), June 8, 2021 at 9:43 AM

Thank you for receiving this correspondence concerning case # 5-H-21UR. I have been the Pastor of the Eastmore Church of God, located a short distance from the proposed site, for 16 years. I am also well acquainted with the rehab organization involved. I have been privileged to speak to the clients and know some of the staff members involved for approximately 5 years. I am also aware of some of the accusations being made by individuals against the proposal, much of which is misinformation and totally false. For example, many accusations have been made that pedophiles will be brought into the community, and nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, background checks are done on each potential client, and sex offenders are automatically disqualified. Many have also stated they are concerned that people with addiction issues will be introduced into the community as though there are currently no such individuals in the area. Being a pastor in this community the last 16 years I know the problems many families in the area have faced due to addiction issues, and I welcome this organizations help where the need is so great

June 8, 2021
at 9:43 AM

Kelly
37918

6-F-21-UR
Kelly (37918), June 8, 2021 at 9:52 AM

With all due respect, I ask that Dollar General not be brought into our neighborhood. Our housing values will be decreased & it will be a less desirable area to live. There is a DG less than 2 miles on Emory Road and one on Merchants Road. Extra traffic will make an already hazardous intersection even worse. Please do not build in our quiet neighborhood!!!

I petition the county to NOT develop this area into an unnecessary commercial land.

June 8, 2021
at 9:52 AM

5-J-21-RZ

Applicant

5-J-21-RZ
Applicant Correspondence
June 8, 2021 at 10:04 AM

Correspondence on behalf of Applicant.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608100402.pdf

applicant

June 8, 2021
at 10:04 AM

Herbie
37918

6-F-21-UR
Herbie (37918), June 8, 2021 at 10:48 AM

I've lived in Sterchi Hills for 18 years. I like the quite neighborhood and am opposed to the Dollar General at Dry Gap & Ftn. City Road. There is a Dollar General Market 2.2 miles from my house on Emory Road and another 2.5 miles on Cedar Lane. That's close enough. It will devalue our property and cause additional traffic.

June 8, 2021
at 10:48 AM

Kevin
37918

6-F-21-UR
Kevin (37918), June 8, 2021 at 11:19 AM

..
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608111902.pdf

June 8, 2021
at 11:19 AM

Applicant

6-F-21-UR
Applicant Correspondence
June 8, 2021 at 11:21 AM

APPLICANT CORRESPONDENCE (attachments only)
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608112157.pdf

applicant

June 8, 2021
at 11:21 AM

kevin
37918

6-F-21-UR
kevin (37918), June 8, 2021 at 11:36 AM

I am reposting this as I realized after the fact that my attached petition was not formatted correctly.

As the President of the Sterchi Hills Home Owners Association, we are greatly opposed to rezoning Residential land in our neighborhood to Commercial. At this time, we have 206 signatures on a petition from the residents of Sterchi Hills and Sterchi Village who are opposed to this zoning change. We ask the Planning Committee to reject Dollar General's proposal. There are several reason why this rezoning is bad for our community, including increased traffic on narrow roads that are not designed for commercial use, increased crime, decrease in property values, the addition of sidewalks along Dante and Fountain City rd and an overall reduction in the peaceful beauty of our neighborhood. The proposed Dollar General would be right in the middle of a residential area with a beautiful park nearby, having commercial properties in this area is not something we want, especially when there are two other dollar general stores within a few minutes drive of the proposed location. You can see the petition live at: https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/sterchi-hills-say-no-to-rezoning-land-for-dollar
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608113608.pdf

June 8, 2021
at 11:36 AM

Dru
37918

6-F-21-UR
Dru (37918), June 8, 2021 at 12:24 PM

It has come to my attention that there may be a Dollar General store built near my neighborhood. Sterchi Village is a quiet, safe, neighborhood with easy access to restaurants, grocery stores, service stations and "quick marts." All of these businesses are represented within a 5 minute drive of my home. These include 4 locations of Dollar General, one 1.6 miles away on Emory Rd, a second 1.9 miles on Cedar Lane, a third 2.5 miles on Tazewell Pike and a fourth 2.5 miles on Dutch Valley Rd.

It is my opinion that there is no need for a Dollar General store at the proposed location. The location is isolated, surrounded by natural growth. Is this really going to be a safe location after dark? Safe for shoppers or employees? I wonder about what will happen after the first business is built. Is this a foot in the door for still more unpleasant construction, more unnecessary businesses, more lights and noise? More traffic, less safety and comfort in our homes? It seems to be more than a bit excessive to build yet another Dollar General.

Dollar General is known to be a felon-friendly employer. I’d like to believe that current and future employees are upright and honorable folks, but one does wonder. I feel no need to tempt potential criminals by inviting them to our neighborhoods. I do wonder if the members of the commission would welcome this business adjacent to their neighborhoods. If not, why not?
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608122443.pdf

June 8, 2021
at 12:24 PM

Kelley
37918

6-F-21-UR
Kelley (37918), June 8, 2021 at 12:46 PM

I oppose the plans to build a dollar general on Dry Gap. I live in Sterchi Hills and would hate to see more traffic on the roads to our homes. We are a residential area and I would love to see it stay that way. Please consider our families in Sterchi Hills and our love for our private safe residential, non commercial area. There are several other dollar general stores in the area so there isn’t even a need for one.

June 8, 2021
at 12:46 PM

Adrian
37924

5-H-21-UR
Adrian (37924), June 8, 2021 at 1:01 PM

It is well documented in respected medical literature that addiction and mental illness are highly comorbid conditions. "37% of alcohol abusers and 53 % of drug abusers have at least one serious mental illness."

Over half of addicts are mentally ill, it is a fact. Not something said to be hurtful, but a well-established medical fact. Not an opinion. It is fact. Meth can cause prolonged psychotic reactions. Some drugs cause loss of impulse control and violence. The debate is not that these addicts need help with recovery, it is that no one can guarantee how they will act during recovery. Hoping that they can cope is not enough for the safety concerns this causes so close to the elementary school.

Withdrawing addicts get agitated and crave drugs. It is known that drug withdrawal can drive addicts to theft and violent crimes. It would be great if prayers could stop the violent urges, but addiction is its own evil. It takes over even the best people, and they can do terrible things.

You must stop and ask yourself why anyone would think it is a good idea to gather up lots of people who are predisposed to mental illness and crime and put them in the school zone right across the highway from almost every small child in our community. There are so many other available buildings in East Knox that are just sitting empty that this business could use instead. It sounds like someone must be getting paid well to sell out the safety of all those children.

June 8, 2021
at 1:01 PM

R
37918

6-F-21-UR
R (37918), June 8, 2021 at 1:46 PM

One of the lead attorneys has to travel 11 miles to his nearest Dollar General! Oh the humanity. Seems you should be backing the development of a store closer to your home, possibly less than a mile a way? It’s always easier to do things you’d rather not have, in someone else’s neighborhood. If you lived on Maremont would seriously be backing this proposed plan?

June 8, 2021
at 1:46 PM

Jennifer
37924

5-H-21-UR
Jennifer (37924), June 8, 2021 at 2:34 PM

I am opposed to the 40 bed rehab facility in the Carter Community. It is too close to schools, library and parks. There is no public transportation close and there are no stores within walking distance to facility. Also brought up that the owner is not educated in running such facility with positive outcomes. Please reconsider this proposal.

June 8, 2021
at 2:34 PM

Ryan
37918

6-F-21-UR
Ryan (37918), June 8, 2021 at 3:09 PM

I do not agree with the placement of a Dollar General store at the corner of Dry Gap Pike and Fountain City Rd. This area is residential and there are already three Dollar General stores within 4 miles of this location. The closest location is 1.6 miles away. This placement will also bring unwanted and unnecessary traffic to an already busy intersection.

June 8, 2021
at 3:09 PM

Jessica
37918

6-F-21-UR
Jessica (37918), June 8, 2021 at 8:07 PM

Please do not approve this lot to be developed commercially. I have lived in my neighborhood for over 20 years and I have safety and traffic concerns about a potential retailer at this location. There is already 2 other Dollar Generals less than 3 miles away, I do not believe this business would be successful and would just be an ugly empty building in a residential area.

June 8, 2021
at 8:07 PM

Amanda
37918

6-F-21-UR
Amanda (37918), June 8, 2021 at 8:29 PM

I absolutely DO NOT want another dollar general in the area. We are flooded with them already. We want to keep our area free of all the traffic this ridiculous store would being! Stay Away!!!

June 8, 2021
at 8:29 PM

Amanda
37918

6-F-21-UR
Amanda (37918), June 8, 2021 at 9:40 PM

Hello,I am writing to ask you to not approve the construction of yet another Dollar General. This will not only contribute to the many traffic issues in this area, it will lower the property values of nearby subdivisions.

We already have two Dollar stores close by, another isn't needed.

Thank you,Amanda Atkins

June 8, 2021
at 9:40 PM

Joseph
37604

5-B-21-SC
Joseph (37604), June 8, 2021 at 9:56 PM

Below is my attachment to rebut the opposition to closing the dead-end street of Glenmore Dr. I also urge you to reread Richard Clark's statement as it goes into more detail than my own. Most of the comments on this forum (in opposition) are both false and character attacks against my father, my family, and my household. I explain why this is so in simple, clear language to make it the least complicated it can be.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210608215606.pdf

June 8, 2021
at 9:56 PM

Richard
37909

5-B-21-SC
Richard (37909), June 9, 2021 at 1:19 AM

Only having 5 minutes to make a statement at the meeting on 6/10/21 I had to submit this additional statement attached. The statement is in rebuttal to the planning staffs new multiple point comments:

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210609011940.pdf

June 9, 2021
at 1:19 AM

kevin
37918

6-F-21-UR
kevin (37918), June 9, 2021 at 1:29 AM

As the President of the Sterchi Hills Home Owners Association and in light of the recently approved addition of 44 homes in the Sterchi Village sub-division, planning committee case 11-J-20-UR, I ask the planning committee to address the following concerns of the Sterchi Hills HOA which are on the attached document.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210609012920.pdf

June 9, 2021
at 1:29 AM

Amy
37918

6-F-21-UR
Amy (37918), June 9, 2021 at 9:03 AM

Please do not place a discount retailer in the middle of a beautiful residential area, as well as Tommy Schumpert Park. We have to preserve some areas WITHOUT commercial businesses. There are already SIX Dollar Generals, Dollar Trees or Dollar General Markets within 5 miles of our neighborhood. Preserve the natural area without a business on every corner.

June 9, 2021
at 9:03 AM

Jennifer
37918

6-F-21-UR
Jennifer (37918), June 9, 2021 at 9:05 AM

I am against putting a Dollar store on this tract of land. This is a small residential valley of more affluent homes. If Schaad insists on putting a business here, allow it to be something that adds value to our area, not a dollar store that won’t serve the needs of the community. We already have access to two Dollar Generals less than two miles away.

June 9, 2021
at 9:05 AM

Applicant

5-G-21-UR
Applicant Correspondence
June 9, 2021 at 9:29 AM

APPLICANT CORRESPONDENCE
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210609092953.pdf

applicant

June 9, 2021
at 9:29 AM

Leland
37909

5-B-21-SC
Leland (37909), June 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM

Please see attached PDF.
View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210609101336.pdf

June 9, 2021
at 10:13 AM

Anne
37918

6-F-21-UR
Anne (37918), June 9, 2021 at 11:26 AM

Thank you for the opportunity to speak against this application for yet another Dollar General store in this area. I live in Sterchi Village, which is part of a residential neighborhood that already has a full dozen Dollar General stores within a five mile radius (per Google maps, please see attached) including the one recently built on Cedar Lane, a mile and a half away. This is now a very quiet area except for the motorcycles and other speeders on the Rifle Range Rd. straightaway between Fountain City Rd. and Dry Gap Pike, just around the corner from the proposed Dollar General. How much worse will the traffic become with the addition of a convenience store?

The Dollar General on Cedar Lane stays open until 10 pm every night. What are the hours of the proposed store? We just don't need the light pollution from any store's commercial lighting here any more than we need more traffic in and out of a parking lot right on a corner that already can be fairly busy at some hours.

Please also consider how the addition of a Dollar General, or any convenience store, would affect your own neighborhood. Just because there’s a corner that hasn’t been built on yet, can it not be left green? Especially when the proposal is not to add another home to the neighborhood, but to put up a convenience store, completely inappropriate and unneeded on that site.

View Attachment

https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20210609112639.pdf

June 9, 2021
at 11:26 AM

Lynne
37924

5-H-21-UR
Lynne (37924), June 9, 2021 at 12:21 PM

I DO live in this community. I am strongly opposed to this rehab facility going in so close to the elementary school. Regardless of all the prayers and wishes and high hopes of these people, the fact still remains that recovering addicts are unpredictable. I also object to the idea that the staff is going to provide for the transportation needs of residents. This is going to make the residents feel like they are imprisoned, making all of the drawbacks even more acute. Finally, it seems that the facility should not be approved right next door to the site of another facility, since that is actually a requirement! These requirements exist for a reason! Why is all this being forced on people who don't want it?

June 9, 2021
at 12:21 PM

Donna
37924

5-H-21-UR
Donna (37924), June 9, 2021 at 12:26 PM

I am opposed to moving the second drug recovery house into the Carter Community, and ask our MPC commissioners to VOTE NO on the 5-H-21-U-R agenda on June 10th. Please help protect the citizens of the NO 8th district. While the community was on pandemic lockdown, on April 8th, 2021, the Knox MPC Planning Commission approved a large 40 bed rehab for the property of 8537 Asheville HWY (close to our children and seniors). Just as we are understanding how this drug rehab will affect our community, we learn of a request to approve ANOTHER 40 bed drug recovery house in the middle of the Carter Community- again, so close to our children and seniors. The second one is located across the highway from Carter Elementary School (In the school zone) and less than a mile from our middle school, high school, senior center, library, Carter park swimming pool, and children's ballfields. The community will not know what type of criminals or sex offenders will be in these recovery houses. We are very concerned for our community, and especially the safety of our most vulnerable. There are so many empty available buildings around knoxville, that I am sure you can find a more suitable one for the recovery house.
I pray that you will stand up to protect the Carter community. Thank you sincerely, Donna Lorcher

June 9, 2021
at 12:26 PM

John
37924

5-H-21-UR
John (37924), June 9, 2021 at 1:53 PM

I want to appeal to the MPC Commissioners to vote against another drug recovery house in the Carter Community. Those seeking drug rehab need help from licensed clinical professionals in a secure and beneficial location, but to my understanding, the person making application is not fully qualified to run such a facility, having no real experience, being a multiple convicted felon, not having the necessary support to secure a 40 bed drug recovery house, etc. Having no public transportation for these residents, how will they travel to jobs, appointments, stores, etc to meet their ongoing and increasing needs? To the community's surprise during the pandemic, we already acquired a new 40 bed rehab facility April 8th, 2021 that was too close to our most vulnerable citizens. This new facility is too close to our schools, the senior center, library, Carter Park, Carter swimming pool, children's ballfields, and very close to the first facility. Our community needs you to represent us by voting NO on June 10th on agenda 5-H-21-UR. Respectfully,

June 9, 2021
at 1:53 PM

Katie
37931

5-G-21-UR
Katie (37931), June 9, 2021 at 2:10 PM

This is a new and ongoing petition in opposition for this planned development.
http://chng.it/DTrVmJ7F

June 9, 2021
at 2:10 PM