August 14, 2025
Planning Commission meeting
Planning Commission meeting
Public Comments
84 Comments for
Carrie
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Carrie (37922), May 20, 2024 at 6:35 PM
If this property is zoned for single family, then it should STAY single family. There are no duplexes in this area. Duplexes are not needed and they look trashy. It’s bad enough that townhouses are being built on this road. Carrie (37922), May 20, 2024 at 6:35 PM
Homeowners on Westland Bay Drive
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Homeowners on Westland Bay Drive (37922), May 30, 2024 at 6:53 AM
The proposed driveway is right next to Westland Bay Drive. Even now it is not easy to turn onto Westland, and with cars and SUVs parked on the proposed driveway, the view of the oncoming, speeding traffic will be seriously jeopardized and will create a ripe situation for accidents.Homeowners on Westland Bay Drive (37922), May 30, 2024 at 6:53 AM
Approving this project will cause economic harm to homeowners on Westland Bay. Most people don't wish to buy a single-family home on a street that also has duplexes, so selling a house will be near impossible. Even cutting the trees that edge that property next to Westland Bay (where the proposed driveway is located) will reduce the economic value of all the homes on our street.
We very much hope the Planning Commission will deny the request based on these serious safety and economic concerns.
If however the MPC disregards these valid concerns and approves the application, please at least require that the plan is turned around so that the driveway is not next to Westland Bay but on the opposite side where the previous driveway was located, to avoid the serious safety issues. Please also require that the trees along our road not be cut, to somewhat mitigate the economic concerns of the homeowners on the street.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240530065326.pdf
Wayne
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Wayne (37922), June 3, 2024 at 1:45 AM
For more than 80 years residents in the immediate vicinity have fostered and developed single family residences. Sector Plans reflected community desires to maintain the single family heritage of this neighborhood. During rezoning we requested single family residential be maintained. Now, duplexes are being allowed in this zone, but that doesn't account for the character and history of this neighborhood. Allowing duplexes on this property establishes an unwanted and devaluing standard for this area of Westland Drive that should not be allowed. The Planning process should accomodate the historical legacy of this area, as Planning is the last bastion available to preserve the single family residential character of this neighborhood. The Immediate neighbors oppose such a degradation of development and request the single family character of our neighborhood be maintained.Wayne (37922), June 3, 2024 at 1:45 AM
William C & Deborah J
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
William C & Deborah J (37922), June 6, 2024 at 6:31 PM
See attached letter expressing our concerns regarding this proposed development. Hoping the commissioners will take these into consideration when the time comes to vote on this measure. William C. & Deborah J. HallWilliam C & Deborah J (37922), June 6, 2024 at 6:31 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240606183144.pdf
Chris
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Chris (37922), June 6, 2024 at 9:49 PM
We live on Westland Bay Drive, the private road immediately west of the proposed Dream Subdivision; and we would like to express two general concerns with the concept plan.Chris (37922), June 6, 2024 at 9:49 PM
First, as planned, the separation between Westland Bay Drive (serving 9 residences) and the proposed 25' access easement (serving 5 dwelling units) appears inadequate. For safety purposes, rather than abandoning the existing driveway on the eastern side of the proposed subdivision, it should be utilized as the shared driveway for all 5 of the units in the new subdivision.
Second, to help discourage use of our private road as access and parking for the proposed subdivision, a fence or other permanent barrier should be required along the entire boundary of the proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3 with Westland Bay Drive.
Jim and Cheryl
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Jim and Cheryl (37922), June 7, 2024 at 10:22 AM
Please see the attached letter which expresses our concerns with the proposed subdivision plan.Jim and Cheryl (37922), June 7, 2024 at 10:22 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240607102219.pdf
Homeowners Westland Bay
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Homeowners Westland Bay (37922), June 11, 2024 at 9:48 AM
We agree with previously expressed concerns and hope the MPC will deny the application. But if the MPC decides to approve the project, we ask that it be a conditional approval with the following requirements added to previous requests.Homeowners Westland Bay (37922), June 11, 2024 at 9:48 AM
The plan for the duplexes needs to be turned around (180 degrees, west to east) so that the 2 duplexes connect directly with the gravel driveway proposed for the third property. There is no need for a second, concrete driveway. This change will reduce the serious safety issues in turning onto Westland Drive from Westland Bay.
The garage for Lot 1 should be moved from its proposed location northwest of the house to southeast of the house to connect directly with the gravel driveway.
No trees along Westland Bay (bordering all three lots) should be cut.
The suggested wooden fence along Westland Bay should be about 6 feet tall and should not end at Westland Drive. To avoid people walking around the fence in either direction, the fence should turn at a right angle at Westland Drive, run along Westland Drive, and end at the gravel driveway.
Westland Bay Homeowners
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Westland Bay Homeowners (37922), June 11, 2024 at 9:52 AM
We request that the application (6-A-24-UR) be denied, not only for all the concerns expressed so far, but because of possible future development on Westland Bay by the applicant. It is likely that he is considering buying the large wooded tract on our street. He has already had it surveyed. It is also possible that he may buy the property at 1216 Westland Bay which the owner has tried selling many times. His plan may be to cram all this area with duplexes, which could result in about 20 duplexes at the small size he is planning. This may explain why he calls a plan for 2 duplexes and 1 ranch house a 'subdivision.' It would mean about 40 new families on a street where there have been only 9 single-family homes for 35 years. The homeowners on Westland Bay do not want a developer to encroach on our peaceful neighborhood with duplexes (possibly a string of them to come) and destroy the quiet character and the natural beauty of our single-family residential street. (Please read further details and concerns in the attachment.)Westland Bay Homeowners (37922), June 11, 2024 at 9:52 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20240611095224.pdf
Homeowners on Westland Bay Drive
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Homeowners on Westland Bay Drive (37922), July 6, 2024 at 10:31 AM
Homeowners on Westland Bay Drive request the MPC to deny the application for all the reasons mentioned in the 8 prior comments. Homeowners on Westland Bay Drive (37922), July 6, 2024 at 10:31 AM
However, if the MPC supports the staff recommendation to approve with conditions, please add another condition that the staff overlooked.
A fence is needed along the west side of the duplexes to ensure that construction trucks do not park on our private street. If they do, they will block access to emergency vehicles, delivery trucks, trash pick-up, etc. because our street is unusually narrow.
Also, the fence needs to be designed to prevent parking on our private street later by guests or workers coming to the duplexes. In addition to impeding access to our street if they park near the end, the county needs to ensure that no one other than legitimate visitors to our private street be allowed to park on it.
The fence should continue at a right angle along the south side of the lot to discourage visitors to the duplexes from parking on our street and simply walking around the fence. It should be set back a bit so as not to obscure the view of the traffic on Westland from the end of our street. All this should be a critical requirement for the approval process.
Jennifer
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Jennifer (37922), July 7, 2024 at 11:12 PM
Duplexes are "Uses Permitted on Review" and NOT a guaranteed land use based on our Knox County zoning regulations, as I understand it. This portion of Westland Drive has NO multi-family residences and I strongly believe it should remain single family only! The presence of duplexes will lower adjacent housing values and that is not fair to the many people who have lived here a very long time. Just because we are in an overall planned growth area does not mean we need to jam in several multi-family units on lots designated for a single family home. Westland has already endured the addition of a significant number of multifamily units at the Pellissippi, Westland exchange. Being "consistent" with the comprehensive plan is vague and insufficient reasoning in the staff recommendation. In actuality it is entirely inconsistent with our neighborhood along Westland. I respectfully request denial of this proposed land use.Jennifer (37922), July 7, 2024 at 11:12 PM
Matthew
37923
37923
5-E-25-RZ
Matthew (37923), April 26, 2025 at 12:26 PM
See attachment.Matthew (37923), April 26, 2025 at 12:26 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250426122618.pdf
5-C-25-PA
E (37922), May 5, 2025 at 2:28 PM
I would like to strongly discourage the change in zoning to Corridor Commercial. I live nearby and in that decade there have been numerous vehicle accidents on that section of Northshore due to the blind hills on both sides. Very dangerous to turn in and out of with very little shoulder. There is no way to have a turning lane or light either because of Bluegrass Lake. Very dangerous! E (37922), May 5, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Adair
37922
37922
5-C-25-PA
Adair (37922), May 6, 2025 at 7:42 AM
When you read the language of the church's proposal you see that all they want is a new sign. The city should just give them the ability to do this without having to rezone. I agree that any business on this stretch of Northshore would be unhelpful, but that's not what the current owners want either. This seems more like an issue with FUD not replacing the sign in like manner as agreed upon. I live in the neighborhood next door and can attest to the fact that dealing with FUD was limiting at times and we're still dealing with issues with landscaping leftover from their work. So let the church replace their sign without all of the red tape and be done with it.Adair (37922), May 6, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Matthew
37923
37923
5-E-25-RZ
Matthew (37923), May 7, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Changing the place type and zoning will not affect the traffic flow in any way, as the church is making NO changes to the land parcel other than adding a sign (AND CANNOT MAKE ANY CHANGES IN THE FUTURE DUE TO DEED RESTRICTIONS). The property will always remain a church and can NEVER turn into a business of any kind. Traffic flow and patterns will not change because our property is rezoned for CA. This, in our opinion, is an irrelevant argument put forward by the Planning Staff, grasping at straws to prevent our requests from being realized.Matthew (37923), May 7, 2025 at 2:02 PM
One of the reasons the Planning Staff is arguing for denial is that there have been no recent utility changes that warrant rezoning. This is simply untrue, another attempt to grasp at straws. FUD recently ran a completely new sewer line along the front of the church's property that required the removal of the church sign. That is a major utility change that has put significant hardship on the church. This major utility change merits rezoning so that we can have the sign we were promised.
Sherry
37934
37934
5-E-25-RZ
Sherry (37934), May 7, 2025 at 2:04 PM
We respectfully request the Commission consider our request so we can replace the sign at our church that needed to be removed due to the First Utilities project on Northshore Drive. Sherry (37934), May 7, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Due to the layout of the land, it is difficult for a sign to be seen from vehicles passing by.
Granting our request would enable us to let the community know we are there and still open.
The sign we would like is not ostentatious, nor would it be an eyesore to our community. It would allow us to keep members and visitors informed of upcoming meetings and events without having to place large banners near the road.
I have had many people ask if our church was still open because we don't have a sign now.
May God bless you as you strive to make Knoxville an even better place to live.
Ann
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Ann (37920), June 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM
I live in Lake Forest and turning left off Chapman Highway is dangerous but not as dangerous as Red Bud Road. Locust Hill is just before Red Bud and we do NOT need additional driveways or increased traffic on Locust Hill. Traffic studies should be done to see the impact of a new subdivision on Chapman Highway. Also, I am told there is a major cave system under this potential development. I am concerned that this steep and forested piece of land will be demolished to create new homes and thus stop one of the corridors of the Urban Wilderness. I am very concerned that developers use huge equipment to cut down all the trees on this type of property which could be developed for one or two houses and not a subdivision. Please consider the Hillside Protection area and the beauty of the surrounding neighborhoods. South Knoxville has more trees than other areas of town and we are proud of that. Please do not allow destruction of our forests.Ann (37920), June 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Concerned
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Concerned (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:24 PM
I am writing as a resident of Locust Hill Lane to formally object to the proposed development detailed in Case 7-SB-25-C. While I recognize the need for housing in our community, this specific site raises major red flags from a public safety and environmental standpoint that I believe must not be overlooked. Please see the attached rationale. Thank you. Concerned (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:24 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250624172435.pdf
Make it
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Make it (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Prioritizing Investment Property Over Community NeedsMake it (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Perhaps most troubling is that the proposed homes are not intended to be affordable housing for local families or first-time buyers. These units are being marketed as investment properties, likely short-term rentals or absentee-owned income-generating assets. This does nothing to alleviate our communitys acute shortage of affordable, owner-occupied housing. In fact, it exacerbates displacement pressures and undermines the stability of our neighborhood.
Tiana
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Tiana (37920), June 24, 2025 at 7:38 PM
A steep-slope development is planned on parcel 123FA003,Âone of the highest, most unstable peaks along Chapman Highway. The narrow access road is already eroding, unsafe for EMS, and unfit for more traffic or housing. The developer began clearing land without permits, cutting old-growth trees, and misleading neighbors about his intentions.Tiana (37920), June 24, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is not affordable housing, its a high-risk project that endangers homes, wildlife, and Knoxvilles greenbelt.
Read the full letter and join us in demanding responsible, transparent planning
Your voice matters. Lets protect our hill
- Tiana Winter
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250624193820.pdf
Lucas
3792
3792
7-SB-25-C
Lucas ( 3792), June 25, 2025 at 7:54 AM
The access road is narrow, eroding, and unfit for additional traffic. EMS access is already limited, and stormwater from Locust Hill drains directly through the proposed site.Lucas ( 3792), June 25, 2025 at 7:54 AM
In response, residents formally request:
A limit of no more than 3 homes, with lot widths consistent with surrounding properties
See pdf continuation.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250625075414.pdf
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), June 25, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Please see attached PDF for full statementNancy (37920), June 25, 2025 at 6:08 PM
I live at 5304 Chapman Highway and would be significantly impacted by the proposal to build a development behind my house. I have lived here since 1979 and bought my house, in part, because of the wooded area. This woods is wildlife corridor, connecting some parts of the urban wilderness to East Red Bud.
This area is a steep hillside between Locust Hill Lane and 3 houses, such as mine, directly on Chapman Hwy. The proposals scope of 9 houses significantly enlarges density on this strip of land. The entire scope seems far greater than what this hillside can sustain.
There are two proposed houses very close to the area behind my house.
I am concerned also about trees being cut and the impact on erosion of the steep hill, which will impact my property.
This area would certainly have been an area that could have been a protected wildlife and wooded area, rather than inserting 9 houses on potentially unstable land. I urge the MPC to reconsider the need to alter this wildlife and wooded area of Knoxville.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250625180849.pdf
Gene
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Gene (37920), June 26, 2025 at 8:35 AM
The attached file is our strong objection to the development plan for Locust Hill Lane.Gene (37920), June 26, 2025 at 8:35 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250626083507.pdf
Responsible dev.
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Responsible dev. (37920), June 26, 2025 at 5:01 PM
In 3 years this hillside has experienced at least 20 fallen very mature trees which shows active erosion and instabilityResponsible dev. (37920), June 26, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Several vehicles have driven off edge resulting in needing pulled off hillside
A firetruck had to back all the way down and turnout in genes driveway
A streetside parked vehicle was struck by another vehicle.
Multiple kub outages from fallen lines
Tracy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Tracy (37920), June 27, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Please see attached about the concerns of this proposed development. Tracy (37920), June 27, 2025 at 1:51 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250627135144.pdf
Candace
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Candace (37920), June 28, 2025 at 10:48 AM
I am worried about the trees being taken down and the road being busy. Some houses would be okay but 9 is too many. Candace (37920), June 28, 2025 at 10:48 AM
Dede
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Dede (37920), June 29, 2025 at 2:01 PM
I write to ask you to please not approve the Subdivision Concept Plan 7-SB-25-C to be located at the corner of Locust and Chapman Highway. I am a Colonial Village resident and have been for nearly 30 years. I travel this particular section of Chapman Highway on a daily basis. I believe this to be one of the most dangerous stretches of highway in the whole City of Knoxville. There have been countless wrecks and even fatalities. This should be considered before allowing a developer to build more homes right in middle of this very dangerous area. Its literally a matter of life and death. Thank you for your kind consideration.Dede (37920), June 29, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Jaylene
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Jaylene (37920), June 30, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Id like to voice my extreme concern over the development on my very steep and narrow street Locust Hill Lane. My elderly mother lives with me and sadly calling for medical help is common. Its very difficult for emergency vehicles to turn around at our dead end. Im concerned with several more vehicles this will only worsen. Id also ask the consideration of the current setback if 25 feet to be increased to 40. There is no room for vehicles and these houses are most likely going to be vacation rentals for UT games bringing guests who have no concern for actual residents. The noise pollution will be horrendous with all the trees set to be cut down. We will need a stoplight to accommodate all the vehicles coming and going for safety. Im asking for a decrease in the houses being built fine to three. This is a horrible thing we are faced with. Thank you on your consideration. Jaylene (37920), June 30, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Alexis
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Alexis (37920), July 1, 2025 at 8:03 PM
The additional houses will cause so much more congestion to our dead end street that is already dangerous turning out into Chapman Highway on Alexis (37920), July 1, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Patricia
37920
37920
7-A-25-OB
Patricia (37920), July 7, 2025 at 3:34 PM
The siteâs footprint should be moved north towards Waterfront Dr. The green area should be on the Phillips Ave. side. As the diagram shows there are no trees on Phillips just a concrete drive. As with Foggy Bottoms Flats the garages will not be used. TOO SMALL!Patricia (37920), July 7, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Removing Unit 1 completely, only five units would add line of sight on Phillips with trees and green space. There is little room between this site and Foggy Bottoms Flats for Phillips to handle any more parking, some park illegally on the corners. We have lost all of the public parking at Suttree and Langford due to over building.
Note, Foggy bottoms was to have trees and there are none. Storm runoff will be an issue just as Hensonâs development on Phillips has. Not sure why an extra sidewalk is added to the plan as the city will be adding walking space too.
Tom
37914
37914
7-C-25-OA
Tom (37914), July 7, 2025 at 3:49 PM
These amendments are appropriate for clarifying the middle housing (MH) code. The goal of this code is to allow structures that fit and complement neighborhoods with marginally increased density, not cram as much as possible into any lot. The non-conforming lot of record change is imperative as it currently seems to make the lot width requirements null and void. Because the MH code allows more density, it makes sense for it to be the only principal use of a lot. The Design Review Board makes a lot of sense to hear appeals of any staff determinations since they already review cases that are mostly design oriented and understand the context of city neighborhoods well.Tom (37914), July 7, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Sarah
37932
37932
6-A-24-UR
Sarah (37932), July 7, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Im writing to express my strong support for the proposal. Sarah (37932), July 7, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Single-family zoning has been the default for decades, but we now know that gentle density can help address housing shortages, reduce sprawl, and create more walkable, vibrant neighborhoods. This project wont disrupt the character of the community; instead, it will allow another household (perhaps a young family, retirees, or essential workers) to live in a neighborhood they otherwise couldnt afford.
Critics often fear change, but duplexes arent overdevelopment they are a modest, sensible way to add housing without drastically altering the area. Many thriving communities mix single-family homes with duplexes and small apartments seamlessly. This project is an opportunity to move beyond outdated zoning norms that exclude people and drive up costs.
I urge the Commission to approve this project. Lets welcome housing options that make our community more accessible, resilient, and dynamic.
Nicholas
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nicholas (37920), July 8, 2025 at 1:00 AM
I am typing this comment today to formally object to this proposal. While I have only lived here for 9 years, compared to some of my neighbors, I know experienced enough to know that tearing up this hillside to build those houses on that steep of a grade can't be good. Please see my attached document for more details. Nicholas (37920), July 8, 2025 at 1:00 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250708010003.pdf
Hancen
37917
37917
7-C-25-OA
Hancen (37917), July 8, 2025 at 1:09 PM
Please find attached comments related to the proposed amendments to the middle housing standards.Hancen (37917), July 8, 2025 at 1:09 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250708130948.pdf
Christina
37921
37921
7-C-25-OA
Christina (37921), July 9, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Please find comments attached.Christina (37921), July 9, 2025 at 10:25 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250709222501.pdf
Patricia
37920
37920
7-A-25-OB
Patricia (37920), July 10, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Please deny request for driveway at the location requested.Patricia (37920), July 10, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Looking more closely at the first overhead diagram showing the lot and the Foggy Bottoms Flats there is no safe distance or room for a driveway on Phillips Ave.
Foggy Bottoms driveway is located on Foggy Bottoms street crossing ROW. The drainage ditch on Foggy Bottom street will disappear when the road construction for the Round-About is completed. So that will be the best option for a driveway to go. Too much density on one lot.
The majority of the properties (lots) are and were single family on Phillips Ave and the house that was there was a single family home. Once the house was torn down SW2 FBC defined where the entrance location to be.
Emily
37777
37777
6-A-24-UR
Emily (37777), July 10, 2025 at 2:41 PM
The proposed development is in a planned growth area. Per Knox County's own policies, "The purposes of the Planned Growth Area designation are to encourage a reasonably compact pattern of development, promote expansion of the Knox County economy, offer a wide range of housing choices, and coordinate the action of the public and private sectors, particularly with regard to provision of adequate roads, utilities, schools, drainage and other public facilities and services." The proposed development will house a total of four families on 1.30 acres. This development is not going to change the overall character of the neighborhood. The plan is modest and comports with the county's policies and vision for future housing choices. I strongly support this plan. Emily (37777), July 10, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Homeowners, Westland Bay
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Homeowners, Westland Bay (37922), July 12, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Comment 11 is from someone who lives in 37932, not even in our neighborhood, and yet wants to comment on something that will not affect her personally. She callously disregards the valid concerns of people who do live here. Homeowners, Westland Bay (37922), July 12, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Despite the MPC staffs claim to the contrary, property values on our street will fall significantly if 4 townhomes (2 duplexes) are crowded on one small lot at the entrance of our street.
Just because the MPCs future land use plans envision different types of housing in new subdivisions, it does not justify crowding duplex townhomes on a street that has had only widely spaced out single-family houses for 37 years.
Also, planting trees along the curb will not prevent people from parking on our narrow street to get to these townhomes, creating difficulties for emergency vehicles, making it difficult for us to turn onto our street, and obscuring clear sight of Westland before turning onto this busy street. If approved, a fence is a must.
We request the application be denied. Approving it will drastically alter the long-established character of the street, in addition to creating the critical problems mentioned above and in the first 10 comments. Thank you.
Cameron
37912
37912
8-I-25-RZ
Cameron (37912), July 12, 2025 at 12:32 PM
I live across the street and I am a land surveyor so I understand the rules and regulations for rezoning. If the intention is to build a second single family dwelling on the property after subdividing the lot in two. The driveway access need to permitted off of Peltier Rd and or a shared easement established via 1623 Peltier and not Wilson rd. The property sits on a blind curve in the last year there have been 4 major accidents 2 of which resulted in cars being towed out of my yard. There is zero line of sight and people speed down Wilson road habitually. Cameron (37912), July 12, 2025 at 12:32 PM
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), July 15, 2025 at 7:27 PM
One issue that particularly impacts my property is that 2 houses are shown in the proposal directly behind my house. Because of the contour of the property, that is the most narrow point on the entire land. In addition, the slope directly behind my property is 28%. The distance between the top of Locust Hill to the back of my property line is 178 feet and drops at least 50 feet to the back of my property. The height at the top of Locust behind my house is 1050 feet. So the slope is 50/178=.28 (28%). This calculation was based on KGIS mapping and conducted by a UT geographer and mapping expert for me. It seems that the slope calculations should be done for each of the lots, not for the entire development parcel. In addition, the houses are most compressed in the 2 lots directly behind my house.Nancy (37920), July 15, 2025 at 7:27 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250715192712.pdf
Maria
37919
37919
7-C-25-OA
Maria (37919), Submitted during the meeting
Attachment handed out at the meeting.Maria (37919), Submitted during the meeting
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250718083945.pdf
Submitted during the meeting
Ryan
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Ryan (37922), July 18, 2025 at 8:48 AM
As a nearby resident of the Westland community, we are opposed to this rezoning proposal. Properties in the area are all single family homes and should remain so. The location of this parcel is also one where higher density housing would lead to potential safety concerns on to Westland Drive, a very busy 2 lane road. We urge the planning commission to reconsider and to deny this request.Ryan (37922), July 18, 2025 at 8:48 AM
Coury
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Coury (37920), July 20, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Although it may be expected that residents of an old, quaint neighborhood will object to a new housing development in their midst, this particular plan is especially objectionable. It is so poorly sited that it boggles the mind. There are very good reasons why these particular plots of land have not already been developed in the past hundred years, and those reasons have only accumulated as our understanding of proper land use and careful traffic engineering have advanced.Coury (37920), July 20, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Please open the attached PDF for my thoughts on this proposed development.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250720221312.pdf
Jennifer
37922
37922
6-A-24-UR
Jennifer (37922), July 23, 2025 at 9:45 PM
I ask the commission to please abide by the expectation that a zone established for single family homes remain as such and to not try to jam in duplexes in an established neighborhood. It is disrespectful to the existing families and homeowners to modify the zone and allow this type of housing when you know it was never intended for multifamily units. The residents abide by the long-standing belief that their property will not be de-valued by cramming in multifamily housing and it is incredulous that the planning commission hasn't already denied this years long attempt to change the character of our neighborhood. Just because a person can engineer a project so it can fit does not in any way mean that the project is smart, socially acceptable, and congruent with existing features of an area. Please deny the applicant's request.Jennifer (37922), July 23, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Hannah
37920
37920
8-SA-25-C
Hannah (37920), July 24, 2025 at 8:22 PM
We, neighbors and residents of Bays Mountain, reject this development. My grandfather worked for years to buy this land, just adjacent to the property in question, to create a peaceful, rural home for our family. That legacy is worth protecting. We operate a small farm here, and our livestock drink from the creek that runs through the proposed site. Leave it alone. We didnt bush hog our pasture this year because a mother deer raised her fawns there, one more sign of overdevelopment pushing wildlife into shrinking spaces. This land should be sold at a fair price to someone ready to start their own homestead, not to soulless developers building poor quality homes. It will bring in people who complain about livestock, tractors, and the very sounds and smells that define rural life. We strongly urge the county to deny this proposal and help preserve the history, soul, and quietness of our community.Hannah (37920), July 24, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Cindy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Cindy (37920), July 29, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Please don't. Please just don't take this property for more development. Cindy (37920), July 29, 2025 at 2:09 PM
I understand my voice and view do not matter that much, but it does hurt my heart for more land to be made into a concrete jungle.
Steven
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Steven (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:05 PM
I am opposed to this devlopment. Hillside development is restricted and the environmental impact to the carst ecosystem is unacceptable. Not to mention the impact on wildlife and the reduction of our urban wilderness.Steven (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Leah
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Leah (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:36 PM
I am deeply concerned about the proposed subdivision. Clearing the land to build houses out of the character of South Knoxvilles charm will disrupt the area in several ways. First of all, South Knoxville DOES NOT have the facilities and infrastructure necessary to support such a project. Second, clearing the land will do irreparable harm to the areas wildlife and habitats. Deer and other animals depend on that wooded area. If the habitat is destroyed, deer and other animals will be forced to cross Chapman in search of food and shelter. Can you imagine the number of accidents this will cause on an already-dangerous road? Lastly, why? Why are we kowtowing to developers. Is Knoxville for sale to the highest bidder? As a Knoxville native, I sure hope not. I love this city. I love my home of South Knoxville and all its people. We need to focus on infrastructure to support a healthy, prosperous lifestyle for the people of South Knoxville, as well as its animals and habitats. The prospect of a new subdivision at the proposed location breaks my heart. Please dont let it break South Knoxville.Leah (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Brianna
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Brianna (37920), July 29, 2025 at 9:39 PM
We do NOT need a subdivision made anywhere. Building is ruining our wildlife and ecosystem down the drain. And the housing we already have is being bought up by people who try and jack the prices up causing our community to not be able to afford to live anywhere. Please stop destroying our environment. Brianna (37920), July 29, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Kathleen
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Kathleen (37920), July 30, 2025 at 11:29 AM
As a resident of Colonial Village, I strongly oppose this new development at Locust Hill. My concerns are these:Kathleen (37920), July 30, 2025 at 11:29 AM
1. Environmental. Large healthy trees will be removed. The overhead canopy will be gone. Animals who use this property will find backyard In which to probably cause havoc.
2. Traffic at that location, it is on a curve and is already dangerous. Do we really need MORE traffic on Chapman.. particularly at that location?
3. Esthetics. Colonial Village is an established neighborhood with older, more classic styling. One can only imagine the modern cookie cutter homes they will want to place there. We like our diversity and our charm. We do not want square boxes for home with a twig in the from yard indicating that they reforested.
We all know what this will look like. And it is not suited for Colonial village.
VOTE NO ON LOCUST HILL!
Kathleen M.
[redacted]
Homeowner and VOTER
Lance
37918
37918
8-A-25-RZ
Lance (37918), July 30, 2025 at 5:21 PM
I request that you do not approve the 5:1 request. I understand the need for housing and am fine with building. To allow up to 30 dwellings in that area will be extremely unsafe at the intersection of Beeler rd and Emory, you will see many accidents as you do off Brown Gap and the other roads on Emory. The traffic off Beeler road will drastically increase in the next year as DR Horton continues building the dwellings off Beeler road. The Gibbs area and Surroundings have made their concerns known about these 4 and 5 to one ratio approvals. Please do not approve of this, Emory is already extremely dangerous.Lance (37918), July 30, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Darla
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Darla (37920), July 30, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Although housing is critical in Knoxville, it is imperative that your committee carefully plan for growth, as I know you are well aware. I oppose the building of units on a large, wooded acreage that fronts on Chapman Highway south of Stone Road between Larry Drive and East Redbud and backs up to the Urban Wilderness. Building will require the removal of many of the trees and destroy the wildlife pathway that is actively utilized by deer, bear and bobcats and affect the Goose Creek and Baker Creek watersheds. Residents in my neighborhood of Colonial Village have expressed concern about the scope of this development, which is on a steep hillside with numerous caves.Darla (37920), July 30, 2025 at 8:12 PM
William
37923
37923
8-A-25-SU
William (37923), July 31, 2025 at 11:12 AM
The West Hills Community Association respectfully opposes the removal of the existing "C" (Planned Residential) classification, which currently limits dwelling density on this property. We urge the Planning Commission to retain this designation, as it ensures a structured process that allows neighboring residents to participate meaningfully in shaping any future residential development on the site.William (37923), July 31, 2025 at 11:12 AM
We would also like to highlight that the RN-4 rezoning was approved based on representations made by the applicant at the time, specifically, that the development would be limited to a small number of townhomes with minimal impact on neighboring properties. Since then, the original applicant has withdrawn from the project, and the RN-4 zoning now permits a much larger-scale development than many City Council members had in mind when they voted in favor of the rezoning.
Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.
Please see the document attached for the neighborhoods stand on the decision to be made.
Please forward this attached document to all members of the Planning Committee
Case Number 8-A-25-SU
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250731111256.pdf
Boyd
37909
37909
8-A-25-SU
Boyd (37909), July 31, 2025 at 2:30 PM
The West Hills Community Association respectfully opposes the removal of the existing "C" (Planned Residential) classification, which currently limits dwelling density on this property. We urge the Planning Commission to retain this designation, as it ensures a structured process that allows neighboring residents to participate meaningfully in shaping any future residential development on the site. I would note that the RN-4 rezoning was approved based on representations made by the applicant at the time—specifically, that the development would be limited to a small number of townhomes with minimal impact on neighboring properties. Since then, the original applicant has withdrawn from the project, and the RN-4 zoning now permits a much larger-scale development than many City Council members had in mind when they voted in favor of the rezoning. I respectfully ask for your support in maintaining the "C" classification to ensure continued community involvement in this property's future developmentBoyd (37909), July 31, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Melissa
37923
37923
8-A-25-SU
Melissa (37923), August 2, 2025 at 9:19 AM
Please see attached PDFMelissa (37923), August 2, 2025 at 9:19 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250802091926.pdf
Alaina
37914
37914
8-D-25-SU
Alaina (37914), August 2, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Please don't build a 2 family home in that lot. We already have unsafe roads and iffy neighbors. I live across the street from that lot and there's no way for a parking area for that big of a house and I will not share my driveway our rent is already high enough dont add to it. We have enough problems on this street with drugs and speeding please do not add to our already problems. Alaina (37914), August 2, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Ethan
37918
37918
8-A-25-UR
Ethan (37918), August 2, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Im not against new homes, but I dont support building duplexes. They would increase traffic on an already busy road and reduce the privacy of my house, especially if a taller duplex is built. A single-family home would be more reasonable for the area.Ethan (37918), August 2, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Nancy
37871
37871
7-M-25-RZ
Nancy (37871), August 4, 2025 at 3:29 PM
I will submit comments below.Nancy (37871), August 4, 2025 at 3:29 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250804152953.pdf
Autumn
37876
37876
7-SB-25-C
Autumn (37876), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 AM
See the attached PDF File!!Autumn (37876), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806023016.pdf
TERESA
37920
37920
8-A-25-PD
TERESA (37920), August 6, 2025 at 1:43 PM
I live within a mile of this school and drive on Galbraith School Road almost daily. I support this application request, as I feel every abandoned building should find a new purpose in life. TERESA (37920), August 6, 2025 at 1:43 PM
I'm less enthusiastic about the future addition of townhomes, but I would feel better about it if the design of the townhomes fit with the style of the neighborhood around it; i.e., compatible with the older residences and older buildings (businesses, church) in general. I strongly abhor the modern design of the apartment complexes along the river and UT. I think a modern design similar to those would be horribly out of place especially in this neighborhood.
The applicant mentions the need for affordable housing in this city, and I hope that means he or she will make the rents affordable. Can that be a stipulation?
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Concerns, recommendations and questions related to Locust Hill project 7-SB-25-CNancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:25 PM
8-6-25 Submitted on behalf of residents on Locust Hill Lane and Chapman Hwy
The homeowners on Locust Hill Lane and Chapman Highway are part of a close community that is concerned about the scope of the subdivision being proposed for the woods between these two streets. Although we are not against development, we do feel this proposal is too large for this community of houses that were built in the 1940s and 1950s. Our primary concerns are attached in the PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806142539.pdf
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Attached is the Chapman Highway Corridor Study 2006 referred to in our summary of concerns document posted. Nancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806143007.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 6, 2025 at 6:02 PM
I am attaching a letter that some of the community members submitted to Mr. Kherani and Mr. Mullins. We have been trying to work together to develop a compromise. Though many of the neighbors are still adamantly opposed to any development on this property some of us are hopeful that we can reach an agreement that will work. However, we have not reached that goal quite yet. Joseph (37924), August 6, 2025 at 6:02 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806180236.pdf
Jessica
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Jessica (37924), August 6, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Comments attached.Jessica (37924), August 6, 2025 at 6:47 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806184706.pdf
Joseph
37902
37902
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37902), August 7, 2025 at 11:06 AM
See attachmentJoseph (37902), August 7, 2025 at 11:06 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250807110645.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Letter to the Planning Commission regarding a compromise for 205 North Wooddale Rd. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:46 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808184659.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Surveys from Neal's Landing residents, those most impacted by flooding issues. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:49 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808184943.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Surveys from Neal's Landing residents, those most impacted by flooding issues. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:50 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808185032.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Surveys from Neal's Landing residents, those most impacted by flooding issues. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:51 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808185112.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Surveys from Neal's Landing residents, those most impacted by flooding issues. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:51 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808185158.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:52 PM
Surveys from Neal's Landing residents, those most impacted by flooding issues. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:52 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808185241.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Surveys from Neal's Landing residents, those most impacted by flooding issues. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:53 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808185323.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Surveys from Neal's Landing residents, those most impacted by flooding issues. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:54 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808185401.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:56 PM
PowerPoint presentation that goes with submitted letter. Joseph (37924), August 8, 2025 at 6:56 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250808185624.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Petition signatures from opposed neighbors on Wooddale Rd. and in Neal's Landing. Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250809163301.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Petition signatures from opposed neighbors on Wooddale Rd. and in Neal's Landing. Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250809163320.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Petition signatures from opposed neighbors on Wooddale Rd. and in Neal's Landing. Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250809163343.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Petition signatures from opposed neighbors on Wooddale Rd. and in Neal's Landing. Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:34 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250809163457.pdf
Joseph
37924
37924
7-M-25-RZ
Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Conservation Area proposal to conserve the most sensitive wildlife corridor. Joseph (37924), August 9, 2025 at 4:37 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250809163703.pdf
Terry
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Terry (37920), August 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
I have attached my comments of concern regarding the impact this subdivision will have on the acreage's cave system, the wildlife migration route, the removal of trees and its impact on the Goose Creek and Baker's Creek watersheds, and the egress and ingress from Locust Hill and Chapman HighwayTerry (37920), August 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250810131654.pdf
Carlene
37918
37918
8-A-25-OA
Carlene (37918), August 10, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Please approve these amendments to the zoning ordinance. The amendments bring the Knoxville Zoning Ordinance into compliance with recent changes in state law regarding vested rights. The 8-6-25 Memo from the City Law Dept. provides a clear description of the amendments and the underlying rationale. It is important to note that the amendments include an appeal process that protects the rights of all parties.
Carlene V. Malone Carlene (37918), August 10, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Mike
37923
37923
8-H-25-DP
Mike (37923), August 10, 2025 at 5:15 PM
I would like to go on record as being vehemently against this rezoning and related development. Various members of my family - comprising 4 generations - have continuously lived at 2708 W Beaver Creek for over 60 years. The proposed development will destroy the natural rural surroundings of my property and greatly diminish the beauty of the surrounding land. Combined with the previous case, 9-I-24-RZ, to which I also wrote a similar objection, this will strip the forest from the surrounding area and replace it with high-density housing leaving little to no remaining green space. My son, who currently lives in the house, and I plan to attend the meeting, but we are not asking to speak because we have nothing to add beyond what Ive written here. Please consider those of who have lived here and paid property taxes for decades.Mike (37923), August 10, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Benjamin
37902
37902
7-M-25-RZ
Benjamin (37902), August 11, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Please see attached correspondence for comments regarding 7-M-25-RZ.Benjamin (37902), August 11, 2025 at 2:13 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250811141321.pdf
Rebecca
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Rebecca (37920), August 11, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Dear Planning Commission,Rebecca (37920), August 11, 2025 at 9:50 PM
As a lifelong South Knoxville resident and a 25-year homeowner on Rebecca Lane,located off East Redbud, directly behind the proposed development,I respectfully urge you not to approve Subdivision 7-SB-25-C at the corner of Locust Hill Lane and Chapman Highway.
This section of Chapman Highway is already notoriously dangerous, with frequent accidents and heavy traffic congestion. There is no dedicated turn lane, making it hazardous for vehicles turning onto or off of Chapman. Adding more housing and traffic to this area would only increase the risk for residents, commuters, and emergency responders.
Additionally, the karst topography and steep hillside make this site ill-suited for development. The risks of erosion, drainage problems, and structural instability are significant, and would likely affect not only the proposed site but surrounding properties as well.
This land also borders the Urban Wilderness, a treasured and ecologically sensitive area. Development here would disrupt local watersheds and destroy crucial wildlife corridors. Deer and other animals, already squeezed by encroaching development, would be pushed into roadways and nearby neighborhoodsÂposing safety risks and harming local biodiversity.
I urge you to consider the long-term impacts on our community, our environment, and public safety. Please help us protect what makes South Knoxville special by rejecting this inappropriate development.
Applicant
7-O-25-RZ
Applicant Correspondence
August 12, 2025 at 1:17 PM
See attachedApplicant Correspondence
August 12, 2025 at 1:17 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250812131716.pdf
applicant