October 5, 2023
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

81 Comments
Case Number
Name
Comment
Attachment
On Behalf Of
Date
7-A-23-DP
Leslie
37923
7-A-23-DP
Leslie (37923), July 9, 2023 at 8:53 PM
The traffic situation near the proposed development on Nubbin Ridge Road has become increasingly more dangerous with high traffic volume, speeders, careless drivers, and oversized trucks. My husband and I live in Farrington Subdivision and regularly travel by Penrose Terrace and the proposed development. We have encountered numerous oncoming vehicles that have crossed over the center yellow line into our lane. Nubbin Ridge road on both approaches to 8502 is narrow, winding, hilly, and visually obscured by trees and fences. Line of sight is barely adequate during ideal conditions while driving the posted speed limit. We strongly urge you to deny the granting of a variance for this proposed development.
July 9, 2023
at 8:53 PM
8-C-23-OA
Tyler
37912
8-C-23-OA
Tyler (37912), July 24, 2023 at 2:44 PM
I'm all for densification, but I think letting landlords put ADUs in all their green spaces probably isn't the best route. If we keep the owner occupied property rule, I'd be in favor of the other changes, as it would all more low income homeowners to build ADUs.
July 24, 2023
at 2:44 PM
8-B-23-OA
John
37931
8-B-23-OA
John (37931), July 25, 2023 at 5:38 PM
I am fully in support of these changes. Far too often variances are required to rebuild identically to the surrounding houses and neighborhood. The current zoning ordinance is designed for larger .25 acre lots and is not consistent with the fact that most older neighborhoods have 50' widths. There has been substantial investment and vetting of these changes through the "missing middle study", but unfortunately none of them have been implemented yet. Building more homes is the only solution to the housing crisis we face.
July 25, 2023
at 5:38 PM
8-C-23-OA
Ron
37919
8-C-23-OA
Ron (37919), July 26, 2023 at 8:16 AM
We have owned and lived in our home for approximately 21 years. In our neighborhood our house is on a slope with a much larger front yard than backyard. Our children grew up and left town because they could no longer afford to live here.
Under the current rules for ADUs, we could not build one in our backyard. As I understand it this amendment would correct that and allow us to build one in our backyard.
I'm not sure why there's even a question about doing this we are in a serious housing crisis in this city and it seems like we need to use every possible means to address this housing shortage.
I also agree with the provision that is part of this amendment which allows only one ADU on a property. That protects the neighborhood and protects our home values.
July 26, 2023
at 8:16 AM
8-A-23-OA
Bill
37919
8-A-23-OA
Bill (37919), July 26, 2023 at 9:25 AM
I support R. Bentley Marlow's proposal to help allow more affordable housing and reduce our housing crisis.
July 26, 2023
at 9:25 AM
8-A-23-OA
Finbarr
37919
8-A-23-OA
Finbarr (37919), July 31, 2023 at 11:14 AM
this suggestion seem reasonable and probably helpful.
July 31, 2023
at 11:14 AM
8-B-23-OA
Finbarr
37919
8-B-23-OA
Finbarr (37919), July 31, 2023 at 11:17 AM
this recommendation seems reasonable.
July 31, 2023
at 11:17 AM
8-C-23-OA
Finbarr
37919
8-C-23-OA
Finbarr (37919), July 31, 2023 at 11:20 AM
this recommendation seems reasonable.
July 31, 2023
at 11:20 AM
8-D-23-OA
Finbarr
37919
8-D-23-OA
Finbarr (37919), July 31, 2023 at 11:22 AM
this suggestion seems reasonable.
July 31, 2023
at 11:22 AM
8-E-23-OA
Finbarr
37919
8-E-23-OA
Finbarr (37919), July 31, 2023 at 11:24 AM
this recommendation seems reasonable.
July 31, 2023
at 11:24 AM
8-A-23-OA
Christina
37921
8-A-23-OA
Christina (37921), August 2, 2023 at 8:12 PM
I support this application, particularly the addition of a “detached multi-family” development type and removal of the special use review requirement for ADUs. See supportive reasoning attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230802201252.pdf
August 2, 2023
at 8:12 PM
8-B-23-OA
Christina
37921
8-B-23-OA
Christina (37921), August 2, 2023 at 8:15 PM
If I have a C-N lot next to RN and want to build a single family house (permissible in C-N), I’m subject to a residential abutment setback of 20’. A single family in RN only needs 5’ / 15’ combined. That is a pretty absurd discrepancy, especially problematic for an average city lot 50’ wide.
This application raises an important question: what is the purpose of residential abutment setbacks? Not just for C-N but for other zones too (I-MU, C-G, etc). If the setback is intended for larger developments, why are these rules broadly applied for all uses? And for medium density developments, if you can build townhouses in RN-7 with 15’ combined setback, why 20’ residential abutment setback for townhouses in C-N, I-MU, or anywhere?
Needless to say, I support this amendment and would actually support an expansion of the amendment to include consideration of other zones as well. Maybe address the use matrix while you’re at it (e.g. why is SF permissible in commercial districts?).
August 2, 2023
at 8:15 PM
8-C-23-OA
Christina
37921
8-C-23-OA
Christina (37921), August 2, 2023 at 8:20 PM
I support this application. See supportive reasoning attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230802202011.pdf
August 2, 2023
at 8:20 PM
8-D-23-OA
Christina
37921
8-D-23-OA
Christina (37921), August 2, 2023 at 8:23 PM
I support and would consider expanding proposed item 6 in Article 11.3 to include all zones where these residential developments are permissible (not only C-N, but also I-MU, C-G, etc.).
I strongly support the removal of off-street parking requirements where there is street parking, but I am not sure if the wording "adequate street parking" is the most clear for enforcement purposes. Maybe "legal street parking"?
August 2, 2023
at 8:23 PM
8-E-23-OA
Christina
37921
8-E-23-OA
Christina (37921), August 2, 2023 at 8:24 PM
This application again reveals that the code was written with exclusive expectation for heavy development in these districts (not just C-N, but also I-MU, C-G, etc). Why are buffer yards required for low density housing developments in C-N (and others) but not for the same developments in any RN district? Obviously there is a discrepancy here that needs to be corrected.
August 2, 2023
at 8:24 PM
8-A-23-OA
Ron
37919
8-A-23-OA
Ron (37919), August 3, 2023 at 3:27 PM
It seems like this is exactly the kind of revision that our zoning needs to even attempt to address the findings of the MMH report and the need for affordable housing.
Detached multifamily housing seems like a greatly underutilized and a more affordable option in a city that moderate income people are having a hard time even finding housing in.
August 3, 2023
at 3:27 PM
8-B-23-OA
Ron
37919
8-B-23-OA
Ron (37919), August 3, 2023 at 3:30 PM
We're dealing with 75 years of urban sprawl planning that no longer serves the needs of this city. In the midst of a terrible housing crisis that seems like he just keeps getting worse and worse and more and more expensive it's time to rethink how we use our small lots in the CN zoned property. With this revision as I understand it it would allow townhomes and condos and other medium density housing options to be built. This seems like a reasonable revision in the current zoning laws to address our crisis state of housing in Knoxville.
August 3, 2023
at 3:30 PM
8-D-23-OA
Ron
37919
8-D-23-OA
Ron (37919), August 3, 2023 at 3:36 PM
Our city has had enough of urban sprawl and the long-lasting effect it's had on development in this city. It's time to reduce the parking minimums in residentially zoned areas to allow for heavier density development to address the ongoing housing and affordability crisis in Knoxville.
We've lived here for almost 23 years and almost every year the new home price has averaged over $400,000. We have done this to ourselves and it's time to correct it.
Right now in Knox County there are areas where people are living in their trailers and campers because there's extra space for parking. For the most part that does not exist in the city. But if we maintain these arbitrary and antiquated parking requirements it is likely to happen in the future or sooner. Please fix this zoning.
August 3, 2023
at 3:36 PM
8-E-23-OA
Ron
37919
8-E-23-OA
Ron (37919), August 3, 2023 at 3:43 PM
What sense does it make to require buffer zones between multifamily housing and traditional housing developments? Just because my quadruplex next door is owned a particular way does that somehow change its effective use as a house? The quadruplex has nothing more than a large house with four doors. Because of the affordability crisis in Knoxville right now people are renting out rooms people are renting out floors of their entire houses, or we've got multi-generational families where parents are living upstairs adult children in the basement This is far more common than people believe.
And yet I'm unaware of any large protest or complaints about these situations.
Let's move beyond the restrictive zoning that has made affordable housing almost unbuildable in Knoxville. I support this zoning amendment.

August 3, 2023
at 3:43 PM
7-SC-23-C
Angela
37923
7-SC-23-C
Angela (37923), August 4, 2023 at 1:51 PM
Please see 2 Page Objection. Page 3 is a high level timeline for easy reference. Pages 4-37 are reference documents
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230804135125.pdf
August 4, 2023
at 1:51 PM
7-A-23-DP
Angela
37923
7-A-23-DP
Angela (37923), August 4, 2023 at 1:52 PM
Please see 2 Page Objection. Page 3 is a high level timeline for easy reference. Pages 4-37 are reference documents
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230804135223.pdf
August 4, 2023
at 1:52 PM
8-A-23-OA
George
37932
8-A-23-OA
George (37932), August 7, 2023 at 12:05 PM
Agenda items (8A23OA,8B23OA,8C23OA,8D23OA,8E23OA)all relate to defining ADU's and relaxing set backs, buffers and the like. These requests can be construed to introduce ADU's to Knoxville. However, may also be construed as method to simply increase building density way tighter than current standards. They also can allow a rental property be added to nearly any lot/location.
I am against each of these agenda items.
And I think the County, the Planning Commission and residents need A LOT more conversations about introducing and controlling ADU's (like the ADU must be occupied by an immediate family member) prior to introduction of this concept.
Following this research, the concept should be trialed in one district to learn impact and control, and NOT just open the floodgates in all districts!
August 7, 2023
at 12:05 PM
8-B-23-OA
George
37932
8-B-23-OA
George (37932), August 7, 2023 at 12:08 PM
Agenda items (8A23OA,8B23OA,8C23OA,8D23OA,8E23OA)all relate to defining ADU's and relaxing set backs, buffers and the like. These requests can be construed to introduce ADU's to Knoxville. However, may also be construed as method to simply increase building density way tighter than current standards. They also can allow a rental property be added to nearly any lot/location.
I am against each of these agenda items.
And I think the County, the Planning Commission and residents need A LOT more conversations about introducing and controlling ADU's (like the ADU must be occupied by an immediate family member) prior to introduction of this concept.
Following this research, the concept should be trialed in one district to learn impact and control, and NOT just open the floodgates in all districts!
August 7, 2023
at 12:08 PM
8-C-23-OA
George
37932
8-C-23-OA
George (37932), August 7, 2023 at 12:10 PM
Agenda items (8A23OA,8B23OA,8C23OA,8D23OA,8E23OA)all relate to defining ADU's and relaxing set backs, buffers and the like. These requests can be construed to introduce ADU's to Knoxville. However, may also be construed as method to simply increase building density way tighter than current standards. They also can allow a rental property be added to nearly any lot/location.
I am against each of these agenda items.
And I think the County, the Planning Commission and residents need A LOT more conversations about introducing and controlling ADU's (like the ADU must be occupied by an immediate family member) prior to introduction of this concept.
Following this research, the concept should be trialed in one district to learn impact and control, and NOT just open the floodgates in all districts!
August 7, 2023
at 12:10 PM
8-D-23-OA
George
37932
8-D-23-OA
George (37932), August 7, 2023 at 12:12 PM
Agenda items (8A23OA,8B23OA,8C23OA,8D23OA,8E23OA)all relate to defining ADU's and relaxing set backs, buffers and the like. These requests can be construed to introduce ADU's to Knoxville. However, may also be construed as method to simply increase building density way tighter than current standards. They also can allow a rental property be added to nearly any lot/location.
I am against each of these agenda items.
And I think the County, the Planning Commission and residents need A LOT more conversations about introducing and controlling ADU's (like the ADU must be occupied by an immediate family member) prior to introduction of this concept.
Following this research, the concept should be trialed in one district to learn impact and control, and NOT just open the floodgates in all districts!
August 7, 2023
at 12:12 PM
8-E-23-OA
George
3
8-E-23-OA
George (3), August 7, 2023 at 12:15 PM
Agenda items (8A23OA,8B23OA,8C23OA,8D23OA,8E23OA)all relate to defining ADU's and relaxing set backs, buffers and the like. These requests can be construed to introduce ADU's to Knoxville. However, may also be construed as method to simply increase building density way tighter than current standards. They also can allow a rental property be added to nearly any lot/location.
I am against each of these agenda items.
And I think the County, the Planning Commission and residents need A LOT more conversations about introducing and controlling ADU's (like the ADU must be occupied by an immediate family member) prior to introduction of this concept.
Following this research, the concept should be trialed in one district to learn impact and control, and NOT just open the floodgates in all districts!
August 7, 2023
at 12:15 PM
8-A-23-OA
Tara
37920
8-A-23-OA
Tara (37920), August 8, 2023 at 7:47 AM
This proposal will damage existing neighborhoods with negligible affordable housing benefits. This removes opportunities for neighborhoods to have a voice in development, and loosens requirements for developers. This will change the character of historic neighborhoods, leading to additional traffic and safety issues. This is an effort to silence neighborhood input, while providing a boon for developers in the guise of ‘affordable housing.’
August 8, 2023
at 7:47 AM
8-A-23-OA
Aaron
37917
8-A-23-OA
Aaron (37917), August 8, 2023 at 8:28 AM
See attachment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230808082833.pdf
August 8, 2023
at 8:28 AM
8-A-23-OA
Dustin
37917
8-A-23-OA
Dustin (37917), August 8, 2023 at 8:11 PM
See attached for my full comments in support of this Amendment as both a local renter who can't afford a house due to lack of supply and as a Knoxville Transportation Authority Commissioner.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230808201157.pdf
August 8, 2023
at 8:11 PM
8-B-23-OA
Aaron
37917
8-B-23-OA
Aaron (37917), August 8, 2023 at 9:14 PM
I support this amendment on grounds that historical "neighborhood commercial" buildings and nodes often often had minimal setback. Staff makes a point that resonates with me that if engineering has to set setbacks based on sightline distance in the permitting process, that will create delays. For something standard like this and other typical sightline considerations (like when there are existing nonconforming structures on adjacent lot), I think it would be ideal to add a sightline diagram to the zoning ordinance.
August 8, 2023
at 9:14 PM
8-C-23-OA
Aaron
37917
8-C-23-OA
Aaron (37917), August 8, 2023 at 9:44 PM
An owner-occupancy requirement to construct or operate an ADU would be extremely expensive (and thus impossible) to actually enforce and really doesn't prevent developer-ownership of dwelling units in general; it only constrains housing supply. There is no need for a minimum lot size, maximum floor area, or floor area ratio requirement for ADUs as building coverage, impervious surface, and principle structure already effectively regulate ADU size and existence. ADUs should be exempt from parking requirements, as the person building the ADU is capable of determining the local market demand for parking and the transit richness of their particular context. Ability to use transit or non-automobile modes of transportation is much more granular in Knoxville than any particular zone. If we must have a codified requirement, ADUs should be exempt from parking when the street contains street parking or the ADU is within a 1/4 mile of a transit route. The height of ADUs should be increased to allow for garage apartments as a typology. A maximum of 25' or the height of the primary structure, whichever is less would accommodate garage apartments.
August 8, 2023
at 9:44 PM
8-D-23-OA
Aaron
37917
8-D-23-OA
Aaron (37917), August 8, 2023 at 10:03 PM
I support the reduction of parking requirements in the city in general, but agree with staff that this proposal would need to be clarified. In general, homeowners, developers, business owners, etc. are well-equipped to determine their own parking needs. A better approach to parking would be to neither subsidize nor mandate new vehicular parking and leave that determination to market forces.
August 8, 2023
at 10:03 PM
8-B-23-OA
Dustin
37917
8-B-23-OA
Dustin (37917), August 8, 2023 at 10:05 PM
See attached for my full comments supporting Ordinance Amendment 8-B-23-OA.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230808220538.pdf
August 8, 2023
at 10:05 PM
8-E-23-OA
Aaron
37917
8-E-23-OA
Aaron (37917), August 8, 2023 at 10:16 PM
I support this application with regard to the reduction in buffer yard width requirements, but I oppose removal of the landscape plan requirement to obtain a building permit. Landscape design is often overlooked and disrespected, but is as or more important for aesthetics and placemaking than building architecture. The ability to submit a landscape plan after a building permit has been issued will lead to disjointed site designs that do not take advantage of landscaping's ability to provide shade, clean and retain runoff, and contribute to ecosystems.
August 8, 2023
at 10:16 PM
8-C-23-OA
Dustin
37917
8-C-23-OA
Dustin (37917), August 9, 2023 at 9:19 AM
See attached for my full comments in support of all aspects of this Amendment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230809091938.pdf
August 9, 2023
at 9:19 AM
8-B-23-OA
Drew
37917
8-B-23-OA
Drew (37917), August 9, 2023 at 12:17 PM
Please see attached PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230809121714.pdf
August 9, 2023
at 12:17 PM
8-C-23-OA
Drew
37917
8-C-23-OA
Drew (37917), August 9, 2023 at 12:18 PM
Please see attached PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230809121833.pdf
August 9, 2023
at 12:18 PM
8-D-23-OA
Drew
37917
8-D-23-OA
Drew (37917), August 9, 2023 at 12:19 PM
Please see attached PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230809121927.pdf
August 9, 2023
at 12:19 PM
8-E-23-OA
Drew
37917
8-E-23-OA
Drew (37917), August 9, 2023 at 12:20 PM
Please see attached PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230809122019.pdf
August 9, 2023
at 12:20 PM
8-D-23-OA
Dustin
37917
8-D-23-OA
Dustin (37917), August 9, 2023 at 11:01 PM
See attached for my full comments in support of this amendment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230809230114.pdf
August 9, 2023
at 11:01 PM
8-A-23-OA
R. Bentley
37921
8-A-23-OA
R. Bentley (37921), August 10, 2023 at 12:16 PM
Please see attached...
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230810121655.pdf
August 10, 2023
at 12:16 PM
8-B-23-OA
R. Bentley
37921
8-B-23-OA
R. Bentley (37921), August 10, 2023 at 12:17 PM
Please see attached...
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230810121735.pdf
August 10, 2023
at 12:17 PM
8-C-23-OA
R. Bentley
37921
8-C-23-OA
R. Bentley (37921), August 10, 2023 at 12:18 PM
Please see attached...
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230810121810.pdf
August 10, 2023
at 12:18 PM
8-D-23-OA
R. Bentley
37921
8-D-23-OA
R. Bentley (37921), August 10, 2023 at 12:18 PM
Please see attached...
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230810121840.pdf
August 10, 2023
at 12:18 PM
8-E-23-OA
R. Bentley
37921
8-E-23-OA
R. Bentley (37921), August 10, 2023 at 12:19 PM
Please see attached...
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230810121911.pdf
August 10, 2023
at 12:19 PM
8-E-23-OA
Kevin
37918
8-E-23-OA
Kevin (37918), September 11, 2023 at 1:30 PM
The Board of Directors for the Knox County Planning Alliance supports the staff recommendation to deny this proposed amendment to the zoning code. The proposal to reduce buffer yard depth (changes to 12.8.C) applies to all buffer yards across all zoning districts. As staff points out, reducing the width that much would make it difficult to install the required planting, and would have unintended consequences across all districts in the city.
September 11, 2023
at 1:30 PM
8-E-23-OA
Patricia
37920
8-E-23-OA
Patricia (37920), September 12, 2023 at 3:16 AM
I disapprove of 70% decrease in a buffer 30% and landscaping. I live in SW-1 which is low density (homes) and we had Hensons 12 units built where 3 homes had been. They stand out like a sore thumb to the existing cottages and bungalows. There are issues with storm water run-off because the development was allowed to be build higher that the original lots. They’re concrete, no landscaping so the businesses across the alley get flooded. The cottage next door has. 5 feet high clay hill so water runs down onto their yard causing water issues with only 5’ side yard (no Variance). Buffers are more for the home next door for privacy with trees and vegetation not a planter. There are 12 garage and recycle bins too. Parking ends up on Dixie and Phillips and the alley way so car can’t get though nor waste trucks. I also disapprove of removing the owner occupied living on site for ADUs which can end up as a short term rental. A duplex would have been more in line with the vision plan and low density and blending with the character on the neighborhood. This is one dev. That should have been denied and should not get a C of O until issues are taken care of for the sorrounding homes. Phase II could have been buil at 1 1/2 story which could have fit better. This is a case of speculator getting the good old boy pat on the back when you read his permit. Henson appears to be oblivious to the SW-1 FBC.
September 12, 2023
at 3:16 AM
8-E-23-OA
Dale
37909
8-E-23-OA
Dale (37909), September 13, 2023 at 9:33 PM
As chair of Trees Knoxville, a non-profit with a focus on tree canopy promotion and preservation, we oppose the amendment to this ordinance. The landscape buffer possess both an environmental and aesthetic importance. Decreasing this buffer requirement will lead to further canopy loss of valuable tree canopy and increased canopy fragmentation. These are two critical components for maintaining a healthy wildlife habitat and preventing further degradation of our urban tree canopy.
September 13, 2023
at 9:33 PM
8-E-23-OA
Sandra
37914
8-E-23-OA
Sandra (37914), September 13, 2023 at 10:59 PM
Do not reduce our landscape regulations. Landscape plants, especially trees, are important because they:
screen disaparate development
buffer concrete, asphalt, buildings, vehicles
reduce heat islands
aid wildlife
improve mental health
and make our community more attractive
Fences are not trees. Trees provide shade, beauty, and soften our surroundings. Fences are six feet tall. Trees are at least 20 feet tall (or more). Trees are as tall as buildings. Fences barely screen trucks. Please do not change our landscape regulations. Landscaping has no relationship with midrange housing.
September 13, 2023
at 10:59 PM
8-E-23-OA
Thomas
37917
8-E-23-OA
Thomas (37917), September 19, 2023 at 8:05 AM
I support the staff recommendation to deny this proposed amendment to the zoning code. The proposal to reduce buffer yard depth (changes to 12.8.C) applies to all buffer yards across all zoning districts. As staff points out, reducing the width would make it difficult to install the required planting, and would have unintended consequences across the city. Although I understand the need for more housing, I can’t support the amendment. Many other comments have indicated the public benefit of trees and shrubs provided to our community. Trees Knoxville has been conducting a master planning process and the majority of the public has recommended a review of existing ordinances to improve, tighten, and increase the requirements for trees to meet the changing environmental conditions that are causing public harm and issues. Landscaping requirements are a minor cost to the overall development cost and have not been documented to be prohibitive or costly. Studies in Knoxville have shown that the largest need for more trees is on private property and efforts being considered in the master plan will be made to increase canopy cover across the city on all properties. The people who would be living in these new homes would greatly benefit from the added landscaping by reduced heating and cooling as well as other public health benefits. The present requirements should be maintained.
September 19, 2023
at 8:05 AM
7-SC-23-C
Lee
37923
7-SC-23-C
Lee (37923), September 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM
No number of proposed changes or variances alter the fact that the property was deemed unbuildable in the 2014 Concept Plan and it remains so to this day. Is the BZA willing to alter that determination simply to accommodate a persistent developer? I trust not. I drive this segment of Nubbin Ridge almost every day and this particular stretch is dangerous due to disregard of yellow center line. I have been forced to leave the road (which has virtually no shoulder along this stretch) due to oncoming traffic. Public safety should trump this developer's desire to build.
September 19, 2023
at 2:20 PM
8-E-23-OA
Carlene
37918
8-E-23-OA
Carlene (37918), September 21, 2023 at 12:24 PM
Please deny this request. The professional staff recommendation provides convincing reasons why the presently existing, thoughtful standards and processes, are both appropriate and necessary. They are based on experience and the community is well-served by them.
September 21, 2023
at 12:24 PM
10-K-23-RZ
Kimberly
37923
10-K-23-RZ
Kimberly (37923), September 21, 2023 at 5:16 PM
This is a horrible idea. I grew up on Roland Lane and the Butler Farms is now that crazy huge subdivision. It's overcrowded on those little 2 lane, double yellow lined road. Please do not approved this. 20 more house are not needed.
September 21, 2023
at 5:16 PM
11-A-22-RZ
Kevin
37909
11-A-22-RZ
Kevin (37909), September 21, 2023 at 7:49 PM
I live nearby and was hesitant when I first saw Mr.Radcliffs zoning request. I reached out to him via email and he alleviated all of my concerns. Mr.Radcliff has my full support on this rezoning request!
September 21, 2023
at 7:49 PM
10-K-23-RZ
Ryan
37931
10-K-23-RZ
Ryan (37931), September 23, 2023 at 4:30 PM
This is a horrible proposal. Today is the third time this year the water main has been down for repairs on this street. The utilities here are NOT adequate to suggest another 25 houses on that one lot could possibly be considered responsible planning. This narrow 2-lane road with almost 9,000 cars per day should not be forced to support additional traffic from another 25 new houses. 2713 has been a constant eyesore of filthy construction debris and household junk trashing up the lot for the better part of the past year. This builder should not be given license to increase pollution and drainage issues by bridging the stream, and continuing the poor site conditions they've displayed so far on this project. Please use reason and common sense and deny this greedy request. Please don't allow them to pretend 25 houses in a backyard should be called progress.
September 23, 2023
at 4:30 PM
10-K-23-RZ
Terry
37931
10-K-23-RZ
Terry (37931), September 23, 2023 at 9:01 PM
The ask of 5 per acre is not in line with surrounding area. Backs up to industrial park, homes in area 1/2 to 5 acre plots and fronts narrow 2 lane State Rd with zero shoulder room, no plans in State 10 year plan to widen.. Please note lack of frontage, clearly not laid out for that much density.
September 23, 2023
at 9:01 PM
7-A-23-DP
Angela
37923
7-A-23-DP
Angela (37923), September 25, 2023 at 11:42 AM
Providing additional information to consider since my objection submitted in August. It was stated that 15% of all accidents on Nubbin Ridge take place in the .25 mile stretch of road in front of Penrose Terrace Subdivision between Regality Way and Dunaire Dr. Unfortunately a fatal accident occurred at Regality Way on September 12. Information attached. Also a copy of the final plat application to the commission was acquired. The application includes a KGIS map of the property being part of the subdivision property lines and is included in the attachment. While the final plat signed by David Wilkinson left the property off, we see the final plat application by Michael Rhodes is consistent with all other documentation he submitted showing the property is part of the subdivision.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230925114212.pdf
September 25, 2023
at 11:42 AM
10-B-23-DP
Gayle
37920
10-B-23-DP
Gayle (37920), September 25, 2023 at 1:36 PM
We already have enough flooding and traffic problems in our neighborhood, and along Tipton Station. We don’t need high density housing. Our schools are crowded, Tipton Station is unsafe, and we flooding has always been a big problem in our waterways.
September 25, 2023
at 1:36 PM
10-B-23-OA
Danny
37920
10-B-23-OA
Danny (37920), September 25, 2023 at 2:23 PM
1. The City needs to update its Comprehensive Plans before making anymore Zoning changes. Continuing to make drastic changes to the Zoning without updating the Comprehensive Plans is a recipe for disaster and sets a terrible precedence for future Zoning changes. Some Sector Plans haven't been updated since 2007 and all still reference the former Zoning classifications. There is no basis for this change, as it is not guided by any Comprehensive Plan, just as Recode was adopted without updated Comprehensive Plans.
2. The images used to show the transition between existing neighborhoods and more intense Mid-Rise or downtown structures is deceiving. It shows the Missing Middle Housing in the transition area between bigger buildings and Single-Family neighborhoods, and most are probably okay with that, but that is not what is being proposed. What the City is proposing is to mix those MMH uses into the Single-Family neighborhoods against the desire of those residents.
3. There's a reason those uses were not included in the zones during Recode...the residents in those neighborhoods were opposed to them.
4. The MMH uses being proposed for all RN-2 should be restricted to RN-2 properties along roads at least classified as a Minor Collector Road. I grew up at 2415 Lawson Avenue and to suggest that someone could buy that house, tear it down and build a 4-plex building and not change the character of the neighborhood is just wrong.
September 25, 2023
at 2:23 PM
10-B-23-OA
R. Bentley
37921
10-B-23-OA
R. Bentley (37921), September 26, 2023 at 10:47 AM
Please see attached comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230926104759.pdf
September 26, 2023
at 10:47 AM
10-E-23-SP
Dale
7909
10-E-23-SP
Dale (7909), September 27, 2023 at 12:32 PM
I've lived on Westridge for 43 years. I've talked to the neighbors. No one wants duplexes / low density housing in our single family neighborhood To many rentals already. Many park on the street especially in the winter. Cars get hit ! Lots of pedestrian / bike traffic on Westridge. The last thing we need is more. Please don't let greedy developers mes up our single family neighborhood Westhills homeowners don't want it !!!
September 27, 2023
at 12:32 PM
10-K-23-RZ
Cynthia
37931
10-K-23-RZ
Cynthia (37931), September 27, 2023 at 3:01 PM
The amount of cars and traffic that use Byington Beaver Ridge Rd between the underpass and Oak Ridge Highway in a day is staggering. Almost 9,000 per day according to the traffic counts performed by the TPO (knoxtpo.org). For a narrow, 2 lane road with no shoulder that is used as a major thoroughfare, the impact of 24 homes with the street frontage similar to 1 of the existing houses on the street is not responsible. The daily congestion on this section of roadway is already too great. Please do not approve this application.
September 27, 2023
at 3:01 PM
10-K-23-RZ
Stefanie
37931
10-K-23-RZ
Stefanie (37931), September 28, 2023 at 10:59 AM
The traffic daily is horrible and tends to back up from red light or underpass. Their is constant construction. Their are wrecks all the time. Their are many occurrences of power outages or water outages lately. When it rains heavily the roads flood. Please do not add to the problem by building more houses.
September 28, 2023
at 10:59 AM
10-K-23-RZ
Randee
37931
10-K-23-RZ
Randee (37931), September 28, 2023 at 11:12 AM
Hello, I have lived off Hodge Rd facing Byington Beaver Ridge Road for 35 years of my life. My grandmother also lives off Byington Beaver Ridge Road. The years that I have lived there I have seen wreck after wreck. The road is dangerous! When I was 10 years old a semi truck ran off road and flipped on its side sliding almost 20 feet through the front yard. I have witnessed cars running off road into Butlers farm numerous times over many years, flipping the cars multiple times. People also do not drive the speed limit. Pulling out of Hodge Rd on Byington Beaver Ridge Rd is dangerous and has been for years. Adding a lot of homes will only cause more wrecks. Also additional frustrations for when power poles are knocked down post wrecks. Just a few years back right where the homes will be put a young lady died in a fatality car wreck coming around the corner of Byington. Traffic there is already at a stand still before school and at 5 o’clock pm. The road simply can’t maintain that amount of homes being added safely. My family who reside-off Byington Beaver Ridge Road is greatly against this proposal and plan to build more homes. The road itself is too dangerous to even pull out of the driveways now. Karns and Knoxville what matters most money or safety?
September 28, 2023
at 11:12 AM
10-B-23-OA
Whitney
37920
10-B-23-OA
Whitney (37920), September 28, 2023 at 12:50 PM
Unfortunately, the AIA Awards are tonight so I (and many of the architects in town) won't be able to make it to the missing middle workshop so I wanted to go ahead and share some thoughts. Please see attached.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230928125053.pdf
September 28, 2023
at 12:50 PM
10-B-23-OA
Aaron
37917
10-B-23-OA
Aaron (37917), September 29, 2023 at 10:35 AM
Please see attached comments and thank you for considering them.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20230929103504.pdf
September 29, 2023
at 10:35 AM
10-E-23-PA
Matt
37909
10-E-23-PA
Matt (37909), September 30, 2023 at 8:03 PM
I would not oppose to a single family residence being built at this location but the information regarding the developers plans seems misleading. We do not need, nor do we want, a duplex or a multi family housing plan in our neighborhood. This does not fit with the character of the neighborhood and until that is clearly communicated as to the true development intentions, I strongly oppose this rezoning.
September 30, 2023
at 8:03 PM
10-E-23-PA
Keirra
37909
10-E-23-PA
Keirra (37909), October 1, 2023 at 2:05 PM
I currently live Nextdoor to the property that was bought .I have some opinions that I would love to have heard. I personally an I think I can speak for half of the neighborhood do not want a duplex built beside my home . We live in a quite neighborhood an our zone is a single family residence an we would love to keep it that way . I sure don’t want a bunch of traffic outside my window durning the day a night as for all the children that play in the field during an after church hours . Please keep our neighborhood a single family residence a keep this area a low density area !!
October 1, 2023
at 2:05 PM
10-B-23-OA
John
37931
10-B-23-OA
John (37931), October 1, 2023 at 10:32 PM
I am disappointed in the city proposal. Frist, it only applies to roughly 5-10% of the city zones, so any benefit is negligible to nothing. Its really a wasted opportunity to make meaningful changes. Second, the city proposal doesn't include changes for RN-5 or reduce setback issues in other traditional neighborhoods, which all typically have 50' lots. Many of the recommendations from the missing middle report are left out completely. So much more needs to be done to revise the zoning code to increase the supply of housing. Mr Marlows proposals are much better and the board should approve those instead.
October 1, 2023
at 10:32 PM
8-C-23-OA
David
37917
8-C-23-OA
David (37917), October 2, 2023 at 8:15 AM
Hello, I was in favor of the ADU's when the Recode was going through its transformation, attended several of the meetings and thought then and still think that building ADU's in neighborhoods needs some guidelines. The owner of the property should have to live on-site, this will help with controlling the tenants who would live on the property. With an influx of outside investors, they will use ADU's as a tool to double the units per property, regardless of the effects it would have on their neighbors or the neighborhood as a whole. As to enforcing the owner-occupied rule, the city needs to come up with an enforcement provision....change in the deed?
October 2, 2023
at 8:15 AM
10-K-23-RZ
Josh
37931
10-K-23-RZ
Josh (37931), October 2, 2023 at 9:36 AM
I am a property owner on Byington Beaver Ridge Road that will be directly affected by more traffic being forced on our road. Another twenty houses on only 5 buildable acres is just too much. This will add at least 2 to 4 vehicles per house on an already over crowded STATE HWY. This will cause the road to be overused and need repaving more frequently. The bottom of my vehicle already scrapes when I pull out or my driveway from the state not sloping the asphalt into our entrances. There is currently water drainage problems in this area. When heavy rains come, the one lane tunnel is not even accessible. Building this many units on such a small property will increase the amount of drainage that goes in that direction. Although this will increase my property value, I am against the amount of units being proposed.
October 2, 2023
at 9:36 AM
8-B-23-OA
Christopher
37932
8-B-23-OA
Christopher (37932), October 2, 2023 at 9:51 PM
I fully support the idea of reducing setbacks on properties. There is no reason why a property needs to maintain a lawn if it does not have to. Besides, a lot of the grass used is not native with the environment and it requires a decent amount of watering, fertilizer, and pesticides that would be best kept to a minimum. My complaint is not against people who want a wide expansive yard, because I can see why some people like the aesthetic. However, forcing everyone to have a big lawn does tend to restrict development. For instance, much of downtown would be impossible to be built today because all the downtown apartments have no setbacks. R. Bentley Marlow's application is a reasonable one, and I hope that you all pass it through.
October 2, 2023
at 9:51 PM
10-E-23-PA
Mariana
37909
10-E-23-PA
Mariana (37909), October 3, 2023 at 11:18 AM
My house is directly across the street from this plan and like my neighbors I strongly oppose to any other development other than a single home. I agree with my neighbors that we do NOT need, nor do we want, a duplex or a multi-family housing plan,
October 3, 2023
at 11:18 AM
8-C-23-OA
Chris
37919
8-C-23-OA
Chris (37919), October 3, 2023 at 12:52 PM
See attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20231003125253.pdf
October 3, 2023
at 12:52 PM
10-B-23-OA
Caroline
37919
10-B-23-OA
Caroline (37919), October 3, 2023 at 12:54 PM
Please see attached comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20231003125429.pdf
October 3, 2023
at 12:54 PM
10-E-23-SP
Chuck
37909
10-E-23-SP
Chuck (37909), October 3, 2023 at 1:38 PM
I am strongly opposed to this proposed rezoning and development. We live on Gregg Ruth Way, right next to where it is proposed. This neighborhood is all single family homes. The proposed development, a duplex, is out of character with the neighborhood. There are three families and seven kids on our street and many more on Westridge. A single family home on that lot is a good fit. Duplexes are not. I also object on process. There are several things about how this has been proposed that seem a bit dodgy.
October 3, 2023
at 1:38 PM
10-E-23-PA
Chuck
37909
10-E-23-PA
Chuck (37909), October 3, 2023 at 1:40 PM
I am strongly opposed to the proposed development on its face and on process. This is a neighborhood of single family homes. Not duplexes. Developer greed should not take precedence over the needs and wants of the people living in this neighborhood.
October 3, 2023
at 1:40 PM
10-E-23-PA
Sam
37909
10-E-23-PA
Sam (37909), October 3, 2023 at 2:23 PM
The number of homes crowded into this section of Westridge Drive is already too high. Even adding another single family residence is problematic if the new occupants are going to park one or more of their vehicles on Westridge Drive, as many of the other residents on this street already have to, because the lots are so narrow and tight. This effectively turns Westridge Drive into a one lane road. This is quite problematic, especially during West Hills Elementary School pickup/drop-off times, and is always dangerous for the hundreds of children, adults, and bicyclists who come through this section of Westridge Drive daily, as it is one of the busiest parts of the Knoxville Greenway System. There have been several incidents of pedestrians and bicyclists struck here by cars attempting to drive down Westridge Drive, weaving left and right, trying to avoid the parked cars on one side of the road, and the Greenway Users on the other. It is also a nightmare for all of those occupants to simply backout of their small driveways onto Westridge Drive and not hit pedestrians or moving vehicles. Not sure we need more of that. West Hills was planned as a single family residential neighborhood, and its residents have always enjoyed that breathing room and that aesthetic. Please don't destroy that, and please keep Westridge Drive safe.
October 3, 2023
at 2:23 PM
10-B-23-OA
Celia
37917
10-B-23-OA
Celia (37917), October 3, 2023 at 2:32 PM
I commend the City of Knoxville Planning Department for acting on the housing shortage in this city. Many cities wait until the issue is so out of hand that they can never catch up to provide adequate and affordable housing for their residents. However, I think Knoxville is missing an opportunity to provide better solutions by so narrowly focusing this proposal on already dense neighborhoods close to the city center. The Planning Department is going after low hanging fruit, so to speak, by allowing existing homes to be subdivided under this proposal. My neighborhood of 4th & Gill spent over 30 years undoing these types of subdivisions of large homes so families could move in and build a stronger sense of community. Why hasn't any attention been paid to empty buildings and lots along or close to major corridors, such as Broadway and Central? Broadway has ample space for new construction and repurposing of empty buildings all the way from the Broadway bridge to Fountain City. Another example is the old Standard Knitting Mill off Hall of Fame, which has stood vacant for years. The owner does nothing while the building's deterioration gets worse. Why aren't incentives to develop housing in buildings such as the Mill part of a proposal for missing middle housing? There is so much more than can be done by the City than just targeting dense neighborhoods that don't have covenants to protect them. The City can do better!
October 3, 2023
at 2:32 PM
10-SB-23-C
Sarah
37920
10-SB-23-C
Sarah (37920), October 3, 2023 at 2:45 PM
I request the planning commission to require CMH to provide screening for both aesthetic and privacy purposes. Also, consider the safety of all of the residents in placing boundaries between the neighborhood and the farm lands, with dangerous machinery, deep ponds, etc. The land to the south of this development is beautiful agricultural land, the fields grow high with wildflowers. Currently, because the land being developed was previously zoned agricultural as well there are no permanent screens between property lines, just wonderful rolling hills. For the safety and privacy of the residents to the south of this development, please require a permanent fence to be put in place on the property line. In addition, require fast growing trees to be planted to buffer the disruptive noises of a subdivision. Of course, imagine what an eye sore these houses will be for the residents behind them with gorgeous land and beautiful custom homes so please try to match the aesthetic with screening designed from natural elements and vegetation.
October 3, 2023
at 2:45 PM
10-E-23-PA
Joseph
37909
10-E-23-PA
Joseph (37909), October 3, 2023 at 3:44 PM
This is a Single-Family Residential neighborhood, and our unprecedented increase in property taxes reflect this. LDR is not consistent with the conditions and development in the area, as there are no LDR properties in the area. The proposed entrance to this property is half a block from West Hills Elementary School and a block from West Hills and Bynon Park, and, more significantly, it's on the Greenway. The street receives heavy use by children riding bicycles, joggers, families, and their pets. Increased traffic on Westridge Dr is a hindrance to all those in our community who use the road as a way to take advantage of the City of Knoxville's impressive commitment to outdoor recreation as well as to children trying to get to and from school. An amendment to allow for a LDR property in this neighborhood would be made in bad faith. It would benefit the petitioner while harming nearby property owners and the surrounding community.
October 3, 2023
at 3:44 PM