June 11, 2026
Planning Commission meeting
Planning Commission meeting
Public Comments
23 Comments for
Craig
37931
37931
4-G-26-RZ
Craig (37931), March 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM
This location cannot house a development with the current road infrastructure. It's a 2 lane tight road. And the only road access out of developement would be on a blind curve. Craig (37931), March 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM
Charles
37914
37914
5-N-26-RZ
Charles (37914), April 15, 2026 at 12:57 PM
Very interested in the future of this property I own the property directly across from this lot and have seen issues with this road ever since I was a kid. This road is very narrow very blind in a lot of road space areas the edges of the road are already deteriorating with the absence of the county care for most of my life. This property never had a for sale sign or any knowledge of sale for any local person to keep this agricultural. It was a horse field since before 1990 that I know of as I am 35 currently. Please send me emails of updates I'm sure that my individual voice no one cares about however I do think the sale was unfair to anyone that may have been interested and I'm also interested in if they move forward how they will get rid of the flooding that occurs across the road from the new Dr.Horton subdivision that is adjacent from this field will it worsen will they be prepared or made by the county fix this issue? Charles (37914), April 15, 2026 at 12:57 PM
Julia
37918
37918
5-A-26-DP
Julia (37918), May 6, 2026 at 5:24 PM
Hi. My name is Julia M. I live in Hidden Brook subdivision. My property backs up to the property that is proposed for townhome development. I am very concerned about our property value, traffic and scenery if this moves forward. I ask you to please consider not allowing this development. Due to the heavy traffic that we already have on East Beaver Creek and how hard it is to turn out of our subdivision now. I also don't want this to decrease our homes property value. We love having our backyard with the trees and the undeveloped land for the birds and the wildlife and serenity. If this has to be developed, please lower the number of town homes that are being considered. I also request that the developer leave a tree line between our properties in Hidden Brook subdivision that are on Hannah Brook Rd and Berkford Rd to help keep some serenity and not disturb all of the wildlife in the area.Julia (37918), May 6, 2026 at 5:24 PM
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 12:38 PM
We ask that consideration of this plan for Phase 2 be delayed by 2-3 months to allow the developer additional time to correct long-standing design deficiencies in the Phase 1 drainage plan. If the developer cannot complete essential drainage work for Phase 1, he cannot be expected to do so for Phase 2. The attached letter to Mr. Jim Snowden, together with attachments to the letter, reflects the efforts by and on behalf of Mr. Pittman to address these matters over the past several years. Not only is his property adversely affected, but also the sediment build-up in Beaver Creek is impacted, and current and future owners of units sold by the developer may be burdened with a non-conforming and improperly functioning drainage system Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 12:38 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513123813.pdf
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:53 PM
Here are 4 additional attachments loaded in 4 separate submissions that did not load previously.Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:53 PM
Additional submission 1.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513165308.pdf
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:54 PM
Here are 4 additional attachments loaded in 4 separate submissions that did not load previously.Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:54 PM
Additional submission 2.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513165416.pdf
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:55 PM
Here are 4 additional attachments loaded in 4 separate submissions that did not load previously.Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:55 PM
Additional submission 3.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513165528.pdf
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:56 PM
Here are 4 additional attachments loaded in 4 separate submissions that did not load previously.Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:56 PM
Additional submission 4.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513165635.pdf
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:57 PM
Here are 4 additional attachments loaded in 4 separate submissions that did not load previously.Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:57 PM
Additional submission 4.
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:59 PM
And here is a 5th additional attachment that we understand was previously submitted to PC staff by the engineer for the developer.Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 4:59 PM
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 5:01 PM
Here is the 5th Additional Attachment that we failed to load on the previous submission.Arnold (37919), May 13, 2026 at 5:01 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513170150.pdf
Robert
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Robert (37932), May 13, 2026 at 8:39 PM
The case notes state "The rear lot (Lot 2R3) will have access to Harrison Springs Lane as well.Robert (37932), May 13, 2026 at 8:39 PM
Which resident(s) on Harrison Springs Lane will be having an access point through their yard? Or will the access point be going through Harrison Springs HOA owned property? How can this access be given when the property being reviewed does not even have contact with Harrison Springs Lane? Have the homeowners who border this property been contacted regarding this access?
If the statement above was listed in error, then what other statements in the case notes are also in error?
Robert
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Robert (37932), May 13, 2026 at 8:54 PM
All properties along Harrison Springs Lane are located downhill from proposed site plan. Robert (37932), May 13, 2026 at 8:54 PM
In the attached document, blue arrows show current flow of storm water runoff. As of May 13, 2026, natural barriers have already been removed. Currently, no stormwater management plan is in place. What is the mitigation plan to prevent storm water from flooding and damaging homes along Harrison Springs Lane?
Proposed easement and 2-way road (per conversation w/ property owners in early May 2026) will be elevated above the backyards of Harrison Springs residents, many of whom have children playing in their backyard. Proposed road maybe within 5 feet of residents' backyards. Some residents have had all natural barriers removed between the easement and their backyard. What is the mitigation plan to prevent vehicles from crashing into backyards w/ children playing? Can residents request an additional 50 ft setback?
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513205438.pdf
Justin
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Justin (37932), May 13, 2026 at 11:51 PM
I am voicing concerns with the proposed development having access to Harrison Springs Lane. There is currently access to Shaeffer Road for both of the proposed units on the existing property. There is no reason to remove trees to gain access to Harrison Springs Lane. This will also create safety issues with the amount of construction vehicles that will be using the one entrance and exit intended and designed for the 167 residents of Harrison Springs Subdivision. Please do not approve access to Harrison Springs Lane.Justin (37932), May 13, 2026 at 11:51 PM
Joshua
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Joshua (37932), May 14, 2026 at 9:17 AM
I have major concerns about this addition. It will literally put a road 5 feet off of my back yard - a safety issue with cars driving for my children and family. I think this road needs be redirected to the existing driveway. It appears the family does not want the traffic at their house and are redirecting to our yards. Also, they have begun work before this meeting - even before the SWPP protection was in place. Please consider this. Thank you!Joshua (37932), May 14, 2026 at 9:17 AM
Joshua
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Joshua (37932), May 14, 2026 at 10:07 AM
I live at Lot 61 in Harrison Springs and I'm writing about Case 5-B-26-DP. I'm not asking for denial - just that these questions get answered before permits are issued.Joshua (37932), May 14, 2026 at 10:07 AM
The slope analysis shows 7.4 of 7.5 acres is in the HP (Hillside Protection) area, including 1.3 acres of 25-40% slope. Our homes sit at the base of this hill. The wooded slope currently absorbs and slows rainfall â clearing and grading will change that. The staff report calls the impact "minimal disturbance" but doesn't specify what's planned on the steeper slopes. I'd ask that the applicant be required to detail what HP area disturbance is planned and how drainage will be managed to protect the homes downhill.
The plan calls for direct road access to Harrison Springs Lane, already the main road in and out of our neighborhood for residents and a substantial number of delivery traffic and other service workers. The estimated 28 daily vehicle trips plus construction traffic will add to that load. Has the access point been formally approved by Knox County Engineering and Public Works under Condition 3?
Finally, the plat notes the JPE access road won't be maintained by the city or county. Who is responsible for it? An unmaintained private road on a steep slope is also a drainage concern - degraded pavement and shoulders can channel water directly toward neighboring properties. That needs a clear answer before approval.
Kim
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Kim (37932), May 14, 2026 at 10:32 AM
I am writing in reference to Case 5-B-26-DP. Kim (37932), May 14, 2026 at 10:32 AM
I am concerned about the drainage issues that may arise. The homes in Harrison Springs sit at the base of the hill that will be regraded. Right now the slope is wooded, and the trees, root systems, and leaf cover absorb and slow rainfall before it reaches our properties. I would like to make sure the applicant submits a plan to ensure the drainage will be managed and the Harrison Springs residents will not have run off from the project.
My second concern is the use of Harrison Springs Lane as an access road. This is already the primary road in and out of our neighborhood and sees heavy use from residents and delivery traffic throughout the day. The estimated 28 daily vehicle trips from this development will add to that, on top of construction traffic. I am concerned about the safety of our residents, especially children, with the high traffic volume expected during construction.
Lastly, there has been a lot of this proposed construction that has already started and many trees have been cut and grading has been done. I do not understand how this is allowed to happen before the proposal has been approved, but I know the residents that live directly below the access road have major concerns about erosion.
Please take the existing residents of Harrison Springs into consideration before moving along to ensure that our property will not be affected any more than it has been. Thank you for your time.
Arnold
37919
37919
5-A-26-DP
Arnold (37919), May 14, 2026 at 10:47 AM
Neither my client nor I will be available to appear at today's PC meeting. We still request that the Commission consider postponing until KC Engineering has determined whether the developer has remedied the drainage features to comply with the Phase 1 design and any needed modifications. His 11th-hour surge of activity should not be relied upon for compliance without independent verification, as it was likely motivated by pressure to obtain approval of the Phase 2 plan. Clearly, this development will require significant inspections and monitoring.
Arnold (37919), May 14, 2026 at 10:47 AM
Gina
37902
37902
5-B-26-DP
Gina (37902), May 14, 2026 at 10:50 AM
Dear Commissioners and staff,Gina (37902), May 14, 2026 at 10:50 AM
I am reaching out as my constituents are concerned at this location. I am not against this project, but I do have a few conditions I would like to be added on this location.
I would like lots 61-67 ( in Harrison Springs) to be protected as trees have already been removed. I feel this will cause erosion . I would like the applicant to provide a buffer where natural buffer was removed. I would like the buffer to include 6 ft green giants offset every 6 feet along the property line.
The next condition is I would ask the access would only be Schaeffer Rd. The neighborhood is not comfortable with connections. This is a well established neighborhood and since there is already access to Schaeffer Rd. we request that be the only location for access.
Thank you for your consideration and making this a successful project for the applicant and the existing neighbors.
Gina OsterKnox County Commission Chair
Thomas
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Thomas (37932), May 14, 2026 at 10:53 AM
I am writing to formally and vehemently object to the proposed development plan that includes routing an access road through our existing neighborhood for the benefit of a completely separate development. This proposal is unacceptable and would cause serious and irreversible harm to our community, our property values, our quality of life, and most importantly, the safety of our children. Thomas (37932), May 14, 2026 at 10:53 AM
Since this message box permits only a brief comment, I kindly ask you to examine the attached PDF file that reflects the opinions of all my friends and neighbors!
We strongly urge the planning commission to reject this proposal in its entirety and require the developer to find alternative access solutions that do not burden and endanger an established residential neighborhood. There is overwhelming opposition to this proposal from affected homeowners, and we fully expect our concerns to be taken seriously. This development access plan must NOT move forward!!!
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260514105303.pdf
Robert
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Robert (37932), May 14, 2026 at 12:14 PM
Grading for the easement has already begun. Attached are photos showing the proposed access to Harrison Springs Lane and the concerns for stormwater plans. Existing homeowners already have stormwater challenges due to slopes from adjacent property.Robert (37932), May 14, 2026 at 12:14 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260514121402.pdf
Blair
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Blair (37932), May 14, 2026 at 12:16 PM
To whom this may concern,Blair (37932), May 14, 2026 at 12:16 PM
Attached are some of my concerns as an owner/resident of Harrison Springs lane backing up against 1908 Schaeffer Road.
Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concerns.
Blair H.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260514121659.pdf
Robert
37932
37932
5-B-26-DP
Robert (37932), May 14, 2026 at 12:23 PM
Attached letter from Harrison Springs residents with their concerns.Robert (37932), May 14, 2026 at 12:23 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260514122324.pdf