August 13, 2026
Planning Commission meeting

Public Comments

397 Comments for
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), April 5, 2026 at 9:49 PM
Many cities have hills that are pleasant to look at instead of just apartment buildings. This particular hill in Knoxville deserves to be treated specially because of its location at the end of the Gay Street bridge and visible from downtown. Planning needs to insist on SW-5 and SW-6 zoning rules be complied with and WITHOUT VARIANCES. The slopes can be managed with landscaping which is pleasing. The steps should lead up to a park-light public space, not private property. South Knoxville does not need or want another mammoth apartment building on top of one of the few remaining hills that are on the South side. Please do not allow this private seller or developer to have variances to the form-based code that was so carefully planned by the public.
Teri
37920
4-A-26-OB
Teri (37920), April 7, 2026 at 8:49 AM
Please do not build any additional housing units at this location. We have so many "student" housing already in place in this vicinity and the traffic on Chapman Hwy -Henley Bridge is horrid. Since the Gay street bridge is only pedestrian-the traffic is a nightmare trying to get into the city or onto I-40. Knoxville is growing-we understand-but there are so many other places that can fit more housing units and it's not at this location. What an eyesore the riverfront has become with dozens of cheaply built, overpriced apartment complexes. When did Knoxville become a College with a city built around it instead of a City with a college? Money hungry out of town businesses are sucking the beauty out of our town.
Kathleen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kathleen (37920), April 11, 2026 at 11:31 AM
As a home owner and business owner in South Knoxville, I vehemently disagree with the plan to build that complex at Kerbela shrine. They are asking for height and size variances. The South waterfront codes were written precisely to protect South Knoxville. There should be NO EXCEPTIONS TO THESE STANDARD STANDARDS. The corner of Chapman Highway/Henley and Blount Streets already have enough housing. The traffic alone from this complex will turn Chapman Highway into more of a death trap. People exiting their complex at Mimosa Avenue we’ll have to squeeze their way into northbound traffic to go over the Henley Bridge. There is currently a no left turn sign at mimosa and Chapman so there will be no way for residence of this complex to turn left. The southbound traffic coming over the Henley bridge will have to move into the center turn lane and then cross through two lanes of traffic to enter their complex at mimosa Avenue this entrance/egress cannot afford that kind of traffic. The Henley Street bridge is the only north south tributary that we have since the Gay Street bridge is closed.
Lynette
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lynette (37920), April 13, 2026 at 8:31 PM
One set of the stairs up the steep North site of the hill facing the river needs to be converted into a long ramp. I'm a fairly active senior but if I lived there and were to cross the Gay street bridge to town and was counting on the elevator to get me back up the hill and I came back to find it not working.....believe me, I have been there and seen it when there is only one elevator....I would be up that proverbial creek without a paddle. A ramp I would be able to handle slowly but surely.
David
37939
4-A-26-OB
David (37939), April 16, 2026 at 2:19 PM
Please consider the traffic this causes. The roads are already overloaded in this area due to recent developments that did not take this into consideration. Parking is also a problem with the developments there now. The neighborhood and businesses in this area do not deserve to suffer more of this problem. We need adequate infrastructure and parking and what is there now is not sufficient to handle this or even what was done prior to this. Please be a responsible government and due what is fair to all involved directly or indirectly. Thankyou for your attention, David
Eric
37932
4-A-26-OB
Eric (37932), May 5, 2026 at 9:18 PM
What astonishingly boring design. This design will not age well, and in 15 years it's going to look terribly out of date. Knoxville needs to require the developer to come up with something a wee bit more interesting than two U-shaped six story buildings. Let's be known as a city with interesting architecture, not cookie cutter garbage.
Brittany
37917
4-A-26-OB
Brittany (37917), May 5, 2026 at 10:22 PM
Please do not approve this development. It adds absolutely no character to Knoxville and will further degrades the city scape. The design needs to be completely redone.
Douglas
37917
4-A-26-OB
Douglas (37917), May 6, 2026 at 10:45 AM
These plans are terrible. I agree with a previous comment which states that planning needs to insist on SW-5 and SW-6 zoning rules be complied with. There are very good reasons for these rules that were discussed with and approved by the community. This is an important and very prominent location that deserves special attention and long term thinking. I also didn't see any traffic planning associated with this development or reasoning why an active retirement community needs to be placed on top of a hill. Are there no more flat, street level locations in all of Knoxville?
Joel
37921
4-A-26-OB
Joel (37921), May 6, 2026 at 11:26 AM
Whatever gets built on Kerbela Hill will dominate the view from almost everywhere downtown. The current plan looks like a prison crossed with a second-rate Motel 6, looming over a city that deserves far better. Knoxville deserves beautiful architecture that fits the character of downtown. This is not it.
The community already made the feedback clear: a site this visible cannot look like crap. Adding a pathway through the middle of the monstrosity does not fix the fact that it still looks like crap. This is not some cheap apartment complex in the middle of nowhere being peddled as luxury. It is one of the most important pieces of land in the city, and treating it this carelessly is insulting.
Deny this design. Hold the developers and the city to a higher standard. Build something on that hill that makes people look down Gay Street in wonder or at the very least, not in disgust.
4-A-26-OB
Dan (37920), May 7, 2026 at 1:52 PM
See attached pdf for comments
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260507135253.pdf
Annabel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Annabel (37920), May 7, 2026 at 11:02 PM
I reside and work in South Knoxville and traverse the area around the proposed apartment site daily. The Sevier avenue corridor has been through a lot of changes over the past few years, but the proposed apartment complex on the Kerbela temple site is beyond overwhelming in the many ways it does not follow the South Waterfront plan. Additionally, the lack of consideration for the community is quite concerning. The sheer size of the complex in and of itself is the most distressing part of the proposal. The additional vehicle traffic it will bring to an already overwhelmed area is potentially crippling to the community. And there is no benefit that I have seen for the community.
Please put the brakes on this and encourage the developers to follow the code, follow the recommendations of the South Waterfront Advisory Group and have some consideration for our community. Thank you
Mike
37920
4-A-26-OB
Mike (37920), May 9, 2026 at 11:39 AM
See attachment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260509113914.pdf
Rachel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37920), May 10, 2026 at 12:32 AM
Attached are comments from the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group. Individual signatures are the end of the document.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260510003227.pdf
Debbie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Debbie (37920), May 10, 2026 at 6:48 AM
This area does not have the infrastructure to support more housing. With the location and the closure of the Gay Street Bridge, 90% of traffic created by this development will use Henley Street. Henley Street is already a source of extreme traffic congestion. This will make that substantially worse.
Stewart
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stewart (37920), May 10, 2026 at 8:07 AM
The applicant was fully aware of the South Waterfront Form Based Code when they developed their plan. They chose to ignore that code. Hours of work by many community members went into developing this code. Once we allow variances it will be harder to deny the next request. Soon the code will not matter at all and the next time the city asks for community input it will be met with little or no response.
Please deny these variances for the Kerbela site.
Katherine
37920
4-A-26-OB
Katherine (37920), May 10, 2026 at 9:50 AM
I want to request that you postpone the next step in the process of deciding what to do about the Kerbela Temple site and its eventual fate. More time is needed so that the community and the developer can continue working on proposed design elements that currently don't meet the objectives and intent of the Vision Plan and the southwest-Knoxville code.
Thank you,
Katherine H.
Louise
37920
4-A-26-OB
Louise (37920), May 10, 2026 at 9:52 AM
I respectfully request to postpone so that the community can keep working with the developer on design elements that don't meet the objectives and intent of the Vision Plan and SW code.
4-A-26-OB
Tim (37920), May 10, 2026 at 12:30 PM
Please do not allow this building to be built at this site. As a lifelong south Knoxville resident who grew up in Island Home and still lives here, South Knoxville is extremely important to me and the city of Knoxville is as well. I believe that this plot of land would serve the city much better as a park, art center, community center, over-look botanical garden etc..ANYTHING but another apartment building. We have way too many apartment buildings going up in south Knoxville and it is ruining the place that I have called home since the 60's. I ask again that you please reconsider what can be built at this site, as this has the potential to help and benefit the community if the right decision is made. Thank you for your time.
Connie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Connie (37920), May 10, 2026 at 2:26 PM
As a resident of South Knoxville, I urge you to postpone this item to allow for more time for conversations and collaborations between the community and the developers, CR-Endeavors. More time for meaningful negotiations will contribute to making sure this extraordinary property is developed in a manner that conforms to and honors the South Waterfront Vision Plan.
Please carefully the review and consider the recommendations of the South Waterfront Advisory and and Advocacy Group. This group has done the "hard lifting" representing and listening to the community's concerns.
Thank you for your service to our community.
Kathleen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kathleen (37920), May 11, 2026 at 10:16 AM
Please heed the South Knoxville community's plea for a slowdown on this process. The code was created for a reason, and many citizens worked very hard to help us plan for the future. This undue haste is a slap in the face to all those citizens. We're pleased that the developers have (upon prodding) been willing to meet with residents and adjust plans somewhat. More needs to be done. Thank you! Katie H.
Melissa
37917
4-A-26-OB
Melissa (37917), May 11, 2026 at 11:13 AM
A comment critique of public engagement on development projects is that it fails to engage potential residents who would benefit from the project, biasing against the project. I would love to live in this area in a 55+ community (I'm currently eligible and very interested!) that is designed for pedestrian, bus and bicycle transportation. I would go car-free if I lived there. I am a potential future beneficiary of a Yes on this. I disagree with the comments that raise the issue of traffic or assert no more multi-family housing should be built.
However, I agree with the points raised in many of these comments about the visual prominence of the site and its importance to future designs according with the VP. I support the statement submitted by the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group on May 10.
I want to live here, but I want it to be as good for the community as possible because I want my future neighborhood to be strong, knitted together, and appreciative of the building where I live.
Kevin
37918
4-A-26-OB
Kevin (37918), May 11, 2026 at 1:11 PM
Knox Community Planning Alliance agrees and concurs with the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group request to postpone so they can continue to work with the developer on this project.
Kent
37918
4-A-26-OB
Kent (37918), May 11, 2026 at 1:47 PM
I love that South Knoxville continues to grow through commercial and residential development. However, from what I've seen, it does not appear that there is anywhere close to adequate parking allotted for this particular development. Until someone can solve that issue (which is already a massive issue along Sevier Ave), I am not in favor of the development.
Further congestion without solutions is not a net win for the Old Sevier community.
Lindsey
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lindsey (37920), May 11, 2026 at 3:31 PM
The South Waterfront Vision Plan was created through extensive public engagement, and projects on major gateway sites like this should uphold that vision.
This development is too large and exceeds the intended block size. Its setbacks and gated design isolate it from the surrounding community, conflicting with the connectivity and accessibility goals of the Vision Plan and form-based code. The project also lacks pedestrian engagement. There is no ground-floor retail, and large blank walls and parking garage frontage create an inactive and potentially unsafe pedestrian environment at night.
Additionally, there has been no traffic study presented for a project of this scale, and there appears to be little meaningful public access to the property. I urge the Planning Commission to seriously consider the concerns and recommendations of the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy group before approving this project.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260511153142.pdf
Josh
37917
4-A-26-OB
Josh (37917), May 11, 2026 at 7:49 PM
I am not a resident of south Knoxville currently, and haven't been in about 15 years. I have lived in Knoxville since 2005, and have seen quite a bit of change in this city. Much of this change has been good, but much has not. A trend in the past several years has been to allow developments like this, and I do not believe this has been positive. I have been relatively pleased by the sprucing up Sevier Ave has received, and I believe this development would NOT be a positive addition, in fact quite the opposite. As such, I hope that this variance is not approved and that this project is not approved.
Alan
37920
4-A-26-OB
Alan (37920), May 11, 2026 at 9:35 PM
Please don't ignore or amend the rules set forth by planners for the South Waterfront. Allowance of a gated development with ignored setbacks is especially distasteful'
Martha
37920
4-A-26-OB
Martha (37920), May 12, 2026 at 8:07 AM
From a design standpoint this could be improved by taking the west wing of the building (motel 6 design), moving it to the west and make it a tower which is allowed in the SW-6 zone. This would allow for a public plaza aligned with the Gay street bridge. The building could include a community room that can be open to the public on occasion like the Kerbela is now.
 
I like that this is geared to seniors but some seniors might prefer to live in a tower. It alleviates the monotony of the plan as presented. Most importantly it allows for a plaza with a sweeping vista of downtown that could be a showpiece for the city.
Davis
37919
4-A-26-OB
Davis (37919), May 12, 2026 at 8:56 AM
I support this project. i think it will be great for Knoxville at large & South Knoxville specifically.
Melanie
37918
4-A-26-OB
Melanie (37918), May 12, 2026 at 11:05 AM
I am writing in support of residential development at 315 Kerbela Ave, while raising specific concerns about the adequacy of the parking and traffic flow provisions in the current proposal.

The plan proposes 228-235 parking spaces for 217-223 residential units, approximately one space per unit. This ratio does not appear to account for visitor parking or real-world usage patterns, and the plan does not include a traffic or parking demand study to support these numbers. The shortfall in on-site parking will likely push resident and visitor vehicles onto the surrounding neighborhood streets.

This is a particular concern for Dawson St., where City Church Knoxville operates a parking lot that serves families with young children on Sunday mornings and throughout the week. The entrance to that lot is on Dawson St., and increased cut-through traffic or competition for street parking in this area would directly affect safe access for families dropping off and picking up children.

The transportation diagram also does not clearly address how traffic will flow to and from the site during peak hours, nor how delivery vehicles, moving trucks, and emergency access will be managed given the grade changes and limited street widths in this corridor.

We would ask that the planning commission require a traffic impact study and parking demand analysis as conditions of approval, with particular attention to the impact on Dawson St. and adjacent residential streets.
Nancy S
37920
4-A-26-OB
Nancy S (37920), May 12, 2026 at 11:07 AM
It is very important that this project comply with the South Waterfront codes. Since there are deficiencies in the proposal, this project should be postponed for the developer to work with the City and community groups to create a compliant project for such a prominent place.

I oppose including the use of the historic 'ghost steps' in any way. The steps should be preserved as an important beloved relic as they are. The property owner could/should apply for inclusion of the "steps to nowhere" on the National Registry of Historic Places. That would be a win/win because the property owner/developer would not have to include non-code compliant steps in the project while mollifying the citizens who demand that they be included.
 
Please postpone this.
Colton
37920
4-A-26-OB
Colton (37920), May 12, 2026 at 11:38 AM
I have concerns about the project's potential impact on parking availability and traffic flow in the surrounding neighborhood. With over 200 residential units and approximately 228-235 parking spaces proposed , I am concerned that the on-site capacity will not adequately meet demand, which could lead to overflow parking on nearby streets. Additionally, the increased vehicle traffic may place added strain on already constrained roadways and affect the safety and character of the neighborhood.
Mary Beth
37920
4-A-26-OB
Mary Beth (37920), May 12, 2026 at 1:01 PM
This is one of the most important sites in Knoxville and absolutely no variances should be allowed. The code is in place for a reason and this site, above all others, should be held in 100% compliance.
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), May 12, 2026 at 1:13 PM
I request that this proposal be delayed for additional input from the community and revised plans from the developer. I appreciate the South Waterfront zoning and vision and this proposal does not meet those requirements. And we should have learned from several ugly buildings on the south side of the river that variances are bad.

This hilltop is an important part of downtown Knoxville and the booming South Knoxville waterfront area. I would like to see something that reflects the uniqueness and artfulness of the Knoxville community rather than another huge apartment building. Surely there can be a plan that includes a welcoming feel to the public rather than a private secluded area. Other cities have such prominent hills be an asset for all citizens. Please work with the developers to be more creative. Thank you.
4-A-26-OB
Kat (37920), May 12, 2026 at 1:39 PM
I have sweet memories of sitting in the Shriners parking lot in the early morning of summer with my friends to watch the sunrise.
 
I love South knoxville. I think it's great that our community is expanding and so is the infrastructure to accommodate the community.
 
I love to see more spaces where all kinds of people from different walks of life can walk and bike around and enjoy nature and local businesses. This is the type of community and growth is something I want to be a part of.
 
This building plan seems squirrelly when it comes to working around city ordinances and has missed the mark of checking in with and hearing the voices of actual community ideas and opinions that will create the type of future we hope for in south knox.
 
Please don't sequester off this beautiful lot and turn it into something that keeps its residents separate. Please create a space where we can get to know residents and frequent local establishments and enjoy the view together.
Aaron
37917
4-A-26-OB
Aaron (37917), May 12, 2026 at 1:43 PM
See attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260512134309.pdf
Maggie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Maggie (37920), May 12, 2026 at 2:14 PM
I do not support the redevelopment in this proposed capacity and urge you to consider the viewscape. This architectural plan will not flow with the current vision for sevier ave and extends the already overly generic multistory development of the area to the west through chapman highway. Please consider requesting multi-use and multi-height development plans rather than two big tall blocks on this prominent Knoxville skyline location.
Kevin
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kevin (37920), May 12, 2026 at 2:49 PM
I would like to share my support for the upcoming project at 315 Kerbela Avenue. I have called South Knoxville my home since 1981 when I started the 4th grade at Giffin Elementary School. I went to Giffin Elementary for 4th & 5th grade and then later on Graduated at South Young High School in 1989 while living on Earl Avenue.
 
I left for the United States Navy in 1989 and at that time South Knoxville was on the decline. Walking or riding a bike along Sevier Avenue was very dangerous , homes were not being maintained, and the area that I loved and called home had a very bad stigma. I would always here conversations of "stay out of South Knoxville".
 
Seeing the growth over the past 10 years and being able to be a part of the revitalization has brought me much joy and now seeing that South Knoxville is one of most desirable areas in Knoxville is amazing. I love going to Sevier Avenue to enjoy food & entertainment and I know that this new development will add so much value to South Knoxville, the waterfront, and the community overall.
Cohl
37920
4-A-26-OB
Cohl (37920), May 12, 2026 at 2:55 PM
I am in full support of this development. For decades the property itself has provided little benefits to the general public and generated little revenue for the city, but that is about to change. This developer has clearly taken the South Knox community, and Knoxville as a whole, into consideration when designing these plans. The developer redesigned their project after 3 public meetings with the community (how many other developers in Knoxville have done that?). They have agreed to bring back the JFG sign, work with the city to provide walk ways leading to Kerns bakery (Kern's bakery owner has publicly states he is in full support of this development) and reduce the scale and size of the buildings after hearing public feedback. The site has serious topo and rock challenges that limit what a developer can do with the property which is why variances are needed. The shriner organization could have sold to a student housing developer or any other typical apartment developer but instead chose this buyer because they are building housing for seniors. The city has spent serious tax dollars on the bridge and sevier avenue street scape project. This project can help generate the revenue needed to pay that back.
4-A-26-OB
Amy (37923), May 12, 2026 at 3:05 PM
I was so excited to learn about the development of a 55+ community in downtown Knoxville. I respectfully request that the planning commission support this development.
 
This would allow my senior father the opportunity to downsize while remaining in the vibrant area he loves. He is a retired UT professor, and has invested and lived in downtown Knoxville for 40+ years. There are many like him who have invested in and live in the 4th and Gill and Park Ridge areas, and need to transition.
 
Regarding comments about increased traffic----this isn't student or young adult housing. Seniors are much less likely to drive. Professionally managed communities typically provide transportation via shuttles / small buses.
Joshua
37920
4-A-26-OB
Joshua (37920), May 12, 2026 at 3:23 PM
I am a property owner and local developer who has built and owns a number of homes and developments in South Knoxville.
I am in favor of this development. We need to continue supporting new housing opportunities and local businesses along Sevier Avenue.
Adding a senior community will further cultivate the diverse age diversity and sense of community that makes South Knoxville such a special place.
Marisa
37920
4-A-26-OB
Marisa (37920), May 12, 2026 at 3:34 PM
This new development will add a lot of value to South Knoxville, the waterfront, and the community overall. It seems the developer has even taken the community into consideration throughout this process such as bringing back the iconic JFG sign and providing walkways for easy access to other South Knox developments. I support the proposed development at 315 Kerbela Avenue and believe it would be a great addition to South Knox.
Stephen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stephen (37920), May 12, 2026 at 4:03 PM
Attached are comments from City Church, a direct neighbor of the Kerbela development.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260512160324.pdf
Jeff
37920
4-A-26-OB
Jeff (37920), May 12, 2026 at 4:11 PM
I appreciate that the developers are open to adjustments, but we need to go further with this. I like how Gay and Kerns can be connected, but the building itself if so pitifully designed for Knoxville and its position on our city skyline. Break this building up, put a park overlooking the river, or make a tower to give height difference. Anything other than a 5 story mega block stretching the width of that hill. Knoxville has enough of those! Bring us something better that the city can be proud of at this downtown summit. And please be more intentional with the JFG sign if you are planning to utilize it.
Cobren
37920
4-A-26-OB
Cobren (37920), May 12, 2026 at 8:52 PM
Generally, I like development.
I don't want the design to be haphazard.
I think there have been some really important aspects that have not been considered. Especially pertaining to the south water front plans.
Please postpone the meeting so that there is sufficient time to review all the plans.
We can come up with something special, but we need to proceed with care.
Nancy S
37920
4-A-26-OB
Nancy S (37920), May 12, 2026 at 9:01 PM
The Board of Governors of the Island Home Park Neighborhood Association requests that the proposal be postponed to give the developer time to work with the City and the community to make sure the project meets the South Waterfront form based codes as well as the spirit of the Vision Plan. A traffic study is needed, also.
Nathan
37920
4-A-26-OB
Nathan (37920), May 12, 2026 at 11:17 PM
I am a life long South Knoxville resident and have watched our little corner of the scruffy city grow immensely the last 10 years. Responsible growth is a net positive for our city. However, I do not believe a 55+ apartment building fits the spirit of The South Waterfront long term goals.
 
Here is what I would like to see change in the plan:
1. Remove the age requirement. We need a diverse citizenry with young adults, families, and seniors. Age restrictions are a form of reverse discrimination and I do not think we should perpetuate the practice.
2. Require a public accessible overlook area to preserve the amazing view of downtown and the river for all to enjoy.
3. Require residents to use the Kay st access point and do not connect the parking lot to Mimosa or Sevier Ave. We need to continue building pedestrian friendly zones on Sevier Ave. and routing more cars that direction will go against this goal.
4. Limit surface parking. Require a garage or structure to avoid large paved areas that will trap heat.
5. Trees. Plant as many native trees as possible under the guidance of a qualified arborist.
 
Some of these items are addressed in the plan, but I want to reiterate their importance.
Lastly, in general, this development will be seen by Everyone looking across the river into South Knoxville. Please treat our home with as much care as we do and make it something we are proud of.
Brianna
37920
4-A-26-OB
Brianna (37920), May 13, 2026 at 6:57 AM
We do NOT need any more development, apartments, etc. You all are crowding us who were born and raised in South Knox. I can barely get to work now without sitting in traffic or waiting on construction. All the development is actually ruining nature.
4-A-26-OB
Amy (37920), May 13, 2026 at 7:22 AM
This project might seem to solve one problem (lack of available housing) but creates more problems. 1) Increasing traffic in an already congested area, 2) Inaccessibility for pedestrians to and by the surrounding community, 3) Lack of equitable access for persons with disabilities (which is especially important in a 55+ community), and 4) Disrespect for the community that thoughtfully planned for the future of South Knoxville. Surely there is another viable plan that doesn't create more issues.
Linda
37920
4-A-26-OB
Linda (37920), May 13, 2026 at 8:21 AM
I appreciate the work that the developer of the Kerbela site (South Waterfront) has done to involve the community in their plans. However, more work needs to be done to make it better. This site is too visible and too important to not get this right. I respectfully ask you to please postpone tomorrow's decision to give the developer and the community more time to work together.
christie
37920
4-A-26-OB
christie (37920), May 13, 2026 at 9:30 AM
The proposed development is not aligned with the previously approved south waterfront vision and plan. It's also not very public-friendly, as currently designed and planned, but could become more so with more time and input from the surrounding community. Not enough time and opportunities have been provided for the community to appropriately weigh in and be heard. Please postpone any final decisions on this development to allow further discussion with additional stakeholders. This development sits at a critical location for south Knoxville at the intersection of Henley/Chapman and the river, and full consideration should be given to such a significant development.
Gary
37924
4-A-26-OB
Gary (37924), May 13, 2026 at 10:12 AM
I would like to suggest obtaining the land between council place and Sevier Ave. Reconstruct that part of Sevier Ave into a two way street with a turning lane onto and off of Dawson Street. Block Council place from vehicle traffic altogether and make it into part of the greenway system connecting to the Gay Street Bridge as part of this development.
Allen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Allen (37920), May 13, 2026 at 10:13 AM
Please see attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513101344.pdf
Mark
37920
4-A-26-OB
Mark (37920), May 13, 2026 at 10:18 AM
Infrastructure must come before more housing developments. Roads and traffic in South Knoxville are already overloaded, and adding another 200 housing units will only make congestion worse and the area harder to access and enjoy.

There is also understandable skepticism about promises that these developments will remain “active 55+” communities. We have already seen a similar situation with the retirement community on John Sevier Highway, where rezoning was approved based on one proposal, only for the property to later become a standard housing development. That precedent raises legitimate concerns about long-term accountability and whether the original intent will actually be maintained.

Before approving additional housing projects, the city and county should first prioritize road improvements, traffic planning, and infrastructure expansion. Growth without infrastructure planning only creates more congestion, safety concerns, and strain on existing residents. Responsible development means ensuring roads, traffic management, and public services are in place before adding hundreds of new housing units.
Terry
37920
4-A-26-OB
Terry (37920), May 13, 2026 at 10:21 AM
As one of the founders and a former representative on the South Knoxville Neighborhood and Business Coalition that gave input on the South Waterfront project, I strongly urge you to support SWAAG's request for another postponement on this agenda item. There are many parts of this proposal that still need to be addressed by CR Endeavors, to ensure that the community will see fruition and not left with empty promises. So please, I urge postponement on this matter.
Jessica
37917
4-A-26-OB
Jessica (37917), May 13, 2026 at 10:54 AM
I am writing in opposition of the Kerbela Development Proposal on the South Knoxville waterfront. The last several years have brought numerous apartments and townhouse style homes, most of them being unsightly and thrown together. Aside from this project breaking codes, the design is an eyesore. Additionally this will cause traffic (which is already bad) to be a nightmare. Why is our city okay with the idea of allowing an out of town developer to break the codes our citizens worked so hard to create with a dismal building that in 15 years will look like garbage? Please listen to your citizens and do not let this pass. We love our waterfront and skyline. This is one of the few beautiful features of Knoxville we have left. Also, please leave the ghost steps as they're a part of Knoxville's history. Instead of this apartment complex, a park would fit wonderfully in this space. It would be appreciated by everyone and not create a worse environment for those in South Knoxville. Thank you for your time.
4-A-26-OB
Zoe (37939), May 13, 2026 at 12:04 PM
Bike Walk Knoxville is in support of SWAAG's position on this project. Please see attached comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513120431.pdf
Pamela
37920
4-A-26-OB
Pamela (37920), May 13, 2026 at 12:23 PM
Bottom ground-level floor should be commercial space to be open to the public. Private residences and private communal spaces can then be built on-top of these public-facing commercial spaces, but no exceptions should be allowed for height for the complex itself, as its view should not impede the view of historic civil war sites directly across Gay Street Bridge. Whatever monolithic statue/structure for elevator that is placed in direct view of pedestrians on Gay Street should be agreed upon by members of the City of Knoxville community.
Kellie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kellie (37920), May 13, 2026 at 1:25 PM
The Kerbela Shriner Temple currently sits on a key location on the edge of South Knoxville and downtown Knoxville. This key location demands the highest level of scrutiny for any new development.

While an active senior living development is not an issue inherently, the manner in which CR Endeavors has approached this is. The facade in the plans does not fit the style of long-lasting development that makes our downtown so inviting and valuable. The massing of the building exceeds the maximum perimeter and footprint in either of the districts the parcels belong to. Considering the elevated location of this site, this is a factor that should not be allowed under any circumstances.

Because of its key location and proximity to downtown, Kerns, and the Art Trail, this site should prioritize public engagement and amenities, public passage and connectivity, and areas that invite leisurely public activities. We should not allow our city to develop into something that is not usable by its people. Development in this location should inherently carry those core values, and any new development should aspire, at minimum, to be as good as, if not better, than the development around it. Promoting apartment deserts with no retail, construction that is an eyesore to any passerby, lack of public outdoor greenspace, and large quantities of traffic in an already congested area creates an unlivable, non-functioning city.

See attached PDF for full comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260513132545.pdf
Logan
37902
4-A-26-OB
Logan (37902), May 13, 2026 at 6:13 PM
This boring rip off of a kitschy Sevierville condo building from the early 2000's will be such a terrible backdrop to Gay St. Why are they using oversized gable roofs and a stone veneer over storefront? All the precedents they used fit in much better than this will and it looks nothing like those, it also looks nothing like what the SW plan envisioned for this area.

Alternative compliance should be allowed when complying with the vision of the form based code requires an alternative approach. We can do better.
Rachel
37918
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37918), May 13, 2026 at 7:06 PM
We dont need more apartment complexes here! The traffic is already bad enough. People keep promising responsible growth, this isn't really responsible growth. The infrastructure cant even take it as it is. This needs to stop.
Whitney
37920
4-A-26-OB
Whitney (37920), May 13, 2026 at 7:30 PM
Please allow for a postponement so that SWAAG and the developer have an opportunity to address all the issues that are so important to the neighborhood.

This property is unique and how the final plan looks can set a precedence for future projects.

Let's make sure we get it right. Thank you for your continued commitment to thoughtful planning and community input.
4-A-26-OB
Ian (37920), May 14, 2026 at 10:43 AM
It is very important that this project comply with the South Waterfront codes. I agree with the many local longtime residents of south Knoxville that are concerned about safety, traffic, parking, congestion, & the generic design that is not deserving of such prime real estate. Those of us who were here before covid are not happy with outside developers building their crappy apartments and overpriced homes here for quick cash. I'm also reading that it is walled off? If that's true a gated community atop our best hill overlook is not welcome. The steps should lead up to a park/public space, not private property. Please stop allowing developers to hack us up. I understand that CR Endeavors has been listening so far, and they need to slow it down further. I'm sure they can do business elsewhere if it's not to their liking. Also, a traffic study is needed, come on.
Mark
37920
4-A-26-OB
Mark (37920), May 14, 2026 at 11:43 AM
I attended the meeting with the developer at the Kerbela site and agree with all the concerns expressed in the SWAAG document. This highly visible property deserves a more carefully worked out plan that is in line with the South Waterfront zoning code and Vision Plan. Please grant a postponement of CR-Endeavor's proposal to allow further planning and community input.
Louise
37920
4-A-26-OB
Louise (37920), June 5, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Please require this project to adhere to the community guidelines in all ways, especially providing -N/S as well as E/W public pathways within the project. These pathways could utilize a pedestrian bridge partnership with the city that would help the walking/biking population reach Kerns and the Rail Trail. Please, City of Knoxville participate in this from the outset instead of making this a future improvement that might never happen. 
 
-Some first floor retail/food spaces would be lovely. Other apartment projects in the area have implemented this successfully.
-An exterior design and finish material commensurate with the high profile of this location. This project will be front and center in our cityscape. 
 
I am very excited to welcome a cutting edge 55+ rental opportunity to the south shore. It is a great idea so let's make them build the best version for us.
Annabel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Annabel (37920), June 5, 2026 at 8:36 PM
I am commenting once again as I don't see any of the major concerns raised by community members being addressed in the revised plans. If the developers truly want to be part of our community, they will follow the South Waterfront code. If they continue to try to get around the code, the Planning Commission needs to deny their petition.
Maggie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Maggie (37920), June 6, 2026 at 8:14 AM
I don't support the development moving ahead before a traffic study is completed in this key area of S Knox and recommend the planning commission require the development to complete a review of the impact on traffic flow and safety. Further, please consider alternatives to the size of this development. The placement will be extremely impactful and shorter units should be considered.
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), June 7, 2026 at 1:00 PM
Once again, this proposal is for a massive private development on a prominent hill in South Knoxville. It will benefit the developers and perhaps the residents but it is not of benefit to the citizens of Knoxville. Instead of adding beauty and access to a large area currently under-used, it will stress city services including transportation, stormwater, waste, lighting and others by unplanned growth. It will not provide a cure for the current middle and lower class housing crisis. The view from downtown and the Gay Street bridge should be welcoming and have the tree canopy the city says it want to maintain or create. The public should have access to the riverfront by more than an asphalt walkway.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), June 7, 2026 at 1:41 PM
I hope you are doing well. I am writing in concer over the expansion of Vulcan. I live in Hickory Meadows subdivision and my home between purchase price and improvements is pushing 500,000.00 in investment. There are roughly 100 houses in this subdivision alone. That is potential of 50,000,000.00 in economic damage just to home owners, which no one can afford. Add in the reduction of property tax revenue and other financial damages. It will reduce/destroy air quality, my house is a year old and is caked with dust. Can't imagine how much worse it will get. Silica is lung damaging, causing a host of severe medical issues from lung cancer to COPD. Simply put, Knox County has grown to much to keep a health and property risk such as Vulcan running much less allowing them to expand. Farragut and Hardin Valley are two of the most affluent parts of Knox County. Significant invest from the state, county, businesses and home owners will be eliminated by the destruction this will cause to our communities. We beg this not be permitted to proceed. Thank you.
Rachel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37920), June 8, 2026 at 2:54 AM
Attached are comments from the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group on the revised proposal submitted to the PC for the June, 2026 meeting. Individual signatures are at the end of the document.
South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group
Stewart
ce
4-A-26-OB
Stewart (ce), June 8, 2026 at 12:08 PM
The revised plan provided by the developer has failed to address the concerns of our South Knoxville community. There is no public north south passage, there is no ground level accommodation for retail and the size of the development exceeds the spirit of the SWFBC. The refusal of the developers to engage with the community does not bode well for future integration into the wider community. For all practical purposes this development will be a gated community. By allowing this development to move forward will encourage other developers to ignore the SWFBC. I understand that South Knoxville is not represented on the PC but I am hopeful the members of the PC will consider the wishes of the residents and deny this development as submitted.
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), June 8, 2026 at 1:04 PM
No variances!! The riverfront code was carefully developed to preserve some sanity regarding development next to the Tennessee river which is a unique feature of Knoxville and historically was the start of the city. The condos on the south side were granted way too many variances and they are not good looking. I am sorry to drive Neyland Drive and look across to see block structures with a bunch of windows. NO VARIANCES!
Benjamin
37902
4-A-26-OB
Benjamin (37902), June 8, 2026 at 3:37 PM
Attached please find the following correspondence from Mr. Mullins regarding Agenda Item #12.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260608153752.pdf
4-A-26-OB
Zoe (37919), June 8, 2026 at 4:09 PM
Please see attached comments on behalf of Bike Walk Knoxville.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260608160942.pdf
Alan
37920
4-A-26-OB
Alan (37920), June 8, 2026 at 8:33 PM
As a 75 year old South Knoxvillian I recall a time when the 'ghost' steps leading to the Kerbela area actually led to homes of many of my friends. Some pathways even connected Sevier Ave to points near Kerns Bakery. I fear the design of the proposed building will prohibit pedestrian traffic. I would like for plans to include pedestrian access to the hill and beyond. I don't believe non-apartment dwellers will have access around the development as it is now designed. It is my understanding ground floor businesses are called for in the regulations for the project. Pedestrian traffic seems to be essential for the businesses to be successful. Thank you for the chance to express my opinion.
Lindsey
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lindsey (37920), June 8, 2026 at 8:56 PM
I am submitting the attached comments from the South Waterfront Advisory & Advocacy Group in support of denying this application. The revised submission fails to address the core concerns raised by residents and stakeholders regarding public access, pedestrian connectivity, block size, future retail opportunities, and compatibility with the South Waterfront Vision Plan. I respectfully ask the Planning Commission to give these concerns substantial weight in its deliberations.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260608205649.pdf
Rachel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37920), June 8, 2026 at 11:18 PM
Attached are comments from the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group. I tried to submit these on Sunday, but apparently forgot the attachment.

View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260608231845.pdf
South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Grou
Debbie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Debbie (37920), June 9, 2026 at 8:04 AM
These revisions do not address the fundamental issues identified by the community. Granting any kind of exception renders the code moot and sets the precedent for any developer to ignore the code and just count on being granted a variance.

This area and the south Knoxville community does not have the infrastructure for this project, nor is it what was envisioned for the community.

Please deny the developer's request.
4-A-26-OB
Kat (37920), June 9, 2026 at 8:55 AM
I've reviewed the revised proposal for this development and I am disappointed in how it still fails to meet the codes that are in place to make sure that new construction will meet the needs of this community.

We actually live here, we want to build this community in a way that creates opportunities for connection and shared spaces.

We can't have this lack of consideration become the lackluster standard as this part of town continues to grow and change.

We have a real opportunity and responsibility to create something special together for a more sustainable future of our growing Knoxville. Let's at least try.
Becky
37920
4-A-26-OB
Becky (37920), June 9, 2026 at 10:02 AM
I completely agree with the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group. The vision and spirit for the South Waterfront is not considered at all in this development. It is WAY to large, and would look like a monstrosity looking down from above from all vantage points. If it is something that is going to be built, there should not be ANY variances allowed. Speaking from experience living near the Livano Apartment complex, and how many variances were allowed by the BZA is disappointing. I've lived in large cities that do a better job at protecting their riverfronts and waterfronts in order for them to be enjoyed as open spaces for the public and not build apartment block after apartment block. I would like for this current plan to be disallowed and have them go back to the drawing board to create more open spaces and use for public access.

I also agree that a traffic study should be done BEFORE any approval, as I live on W Blount and can tell you from experience that traffic patterns should NOT be an afterthought and should be considered prior to any development approvals. They should also have plan improvements made prior to any plan development prior to additional traffic in order to respect those who area currently living in the neighborhood.
4-A-26-OB
Dan (37920), June 9, 2026 at 10:18 AM
1. The Developer's changes from the Admin Committee were very minor. The building as propose will still result in the loss of a scenic feature (Article 7.0.2.G.8.v), specifically the view from the Gay Street Bridge and Riverwalk. The horizontal and vertical massing can easily be mitigated by adding materials and colors to the east and west wings, and by not keeping the same colors and materials at consistent elevations. The project doesn't have to stick with the boring palate of tans and white. Please require at least one and preferably two additional colors, and two additional types of materials (perhaps appropriate shades of green and blue). These colors and materials can also be added to offset and emphasize the gable ends. The massing can also be somewhat offset by the addition of vertical projections at the roof level.

2. Don't be so repetitive with the location and sizing of the windows and the balconies. They can be significantly different across the north elevation.
Lynette
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lynette (37920), June 9, 2026 at 11:27 AM
The BZA, City Council and the Planning Commission refused to approve my house plan application because it did not meet the intention of the South Waterfront Vision Plan. This plan for the Kerbela site does not meet the intention of the South Waterfront Vision Plan and likewise should be rejected.
Kellie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kellie (37920), June 9, 2026 at 2:15 PM
After reviewing the updates from CR-Endeavors, I'm extremely disappointed that they did not address any of the major concerns that both the community or the Planning Commission board mentioned during the last meeting. I attended that meeting, and it was very clear from all parties that there needed to be public access through the site, that the site needed to be developed for commercial/public use cases for the future, and that the aesthetics needed to be significantly improved. The new proposal by CR-Endeavors only lightly touches on the aesthetics of the building, and does absolutely nothing for the public access and future use cases of the property. This directly goes against the Vision Plan and the form-based code for this area. Their proposal does not meet the community or city requirements, and it is clear they have no desire to work with the community or city. If they actually cared about the community, then they would design a property development that adhered to the Vision Plan and the code, but it is clear they do not have the or city in mind, either for today or the future. This is a major disappointment and, frankly, an insult to our beloved city. As the Shriners mentioned, they have already had multiple offers. Let's pick a developer that actually cares about our community and is wholeheartedly willing to follow the Vision Plan and the code. Our city is too valuable to kowtow to a developer who is not willing to do the bare minimum.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260609141509.pdf
John
37917
4-A-26-OB
John (37917), June 9, 2026 at 8:38 PM
If this development acts as a hindrance to pedestrian and cyclist connectivity, the city must deny this proposal. This is entirely contradictory to the communal efforts to better connect South Knoxville, and the city as a whole, by means of accessibility without motor vehicles. A gated residential property has no business being so close to an urban center of a growing city.
Cathy
37920
4-A-26-OB
Cathy (37920), June 10, 2026 at 1:24 PM
CR-Endeavors seem like the typical out of town developers that have come to Knoxville to make a fast buck. They build eyesores, leave disorder in the form of traffic/parking or actual detritus, allow Kudzu to run rampant and destroy our nature.
When they do get cited by Codes they sell the property to a 'new' LLC. Which makes it hard to hold owners accountable. It takes lawyers and money to pierce the corporate veils the shadow LLCs. Money that the City or County Codes don't have. So nothing happens.
We are no longer a poor Appalachian town in need of investment, we need better planning standards as we grow! Especially when it comes to destroying a uniquely designed historic highly visible building.
Kevin
37918
4-A-26-OB
Kevin (37918), June 10, 2026 at 1:43 PM
On behalf of the Knox Community Planning Alliance (KCPA): The KCPA board of directors respectfully requests that you deny the submitted application. The South Waterfront Advisory & Advocacy Group provided substantial and actionable feedback and ideas for improving the design. Many other public comments have also provided useful, and actionable, feedback.
The applicant's revised application has failed to take most of that into account, and the submitted plan does not line up with the South Waterfront Vision.
While uncomfortable, you are our LOCAL appointed representatives. 20 years ago, the community and city put substantial time into developing the design guidelines to make this look like Knoxville, not anyplace else. The applicant has not met the intended vision. Your duty is to represent Knoxville, provide them reasons why you are denying it, and then deny the application because it doesn't fit.
Stephen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stephen (37920), June 10, 2026 at 2:22 PM
City Church respectfully requests that the Commission deny the revised plans for development on the Kerbela site in its current form.
Our attached comments substantiates this request.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260610142241.pdf
Lindsey
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lindsey (37920), June 10, 2026 at 3:28 PM
Hello, I walk with friends weekly in the area of Kerns, Kerbela and the Gay St bridge. Our route takes us down Sherrod Rd, across Kerbela lot, down the stairs on the hillside onto Sevier ave, directly across from Gay St. Bridge. After walking the bridge, we head back the same way, up the stairs and across the Kerbela lot to Sherrod to the apartment complex. These stairs are the best access to Gay St and Blount for the folks in those apartments up from Kerns. I hope keeping that access open is part of the new development.
Aaron
37917
4-A-26-OB
Aaron (37917), June 10, 2026 at 10:13 PM
YES! Knoxville believes that this development should be required to provide guaranteed and legally-enforceable public access through the site for pedestrians. We also encourage the developer to consider taking full advantage of the density allowed in the SW districts, in which they are working, because, in addition to being (presumably) more financially viable for the project, the increased tax base, decreased carbon emissions per housing unit, shorter commutes, and increased walkability will benefit the current and future residents of Knoxville.
James
37918
7-O-26-RZ
James (37918), June 13, 2026 at 9:18 PM
How is this new project going to affect our utilities. We are currently at a high-water pressure in order to supply homes down the line. Every day we have 3 or 4 severe water pressure drop offs during high usage times. (solution is larger water supply line down Crippen).
We currently have minor road flooding in a couple of areas during heavy or prolonged rains. Plus, extreme flooding in the greenway after prolonged rains. When you open up the forestry area where is all the water to go. Since Oaks Springs Villas sits at a lower elevation, we will suffer the effects which will not be good. The 3DU/AC zoning they are requesting seems to be a direct conflict with current drainage issues of our area. (They should be restricted to 2DU/AC. This would allow yards to retain some of the runoff water).
Currently traffic is already bad at rush hour. On several occasions I have had to wait 3 lights to get through the light on Crippen. Adding another 16,200+ car each month will really make a mess out of traffic and is already bumper to bumper all the way up Maynardville pike to the top of the hill.
Steven
37932
7-B-26-UR
Steven (37932), June 15, 2026 at 10:45 PM
I live in the Hickory Meadows neighborhood here in Hardin Valley. I have a lot of concerns to voice regarding the newly proposed Vulcan expansion. This expansion would back up straight to my property.
First, the whole neighborhood can already feel the physical effects of blasting from Vulcans current location and moving closer to our properties would be disastrous for the structural integrity of our homes.
Next, I also worry of the health concerns from the effects of RCS (Respirable Crystalline Sylica) for my wife, son, and myself.
Like many other young families in the neighborhood, we are first time home owners. We bought this house looking to start our lives and build equity. This expansion would ultimately ruin everything and completely put our family in financial purgatory.
My final question/thought is, we were never made aware of this expansion being a possibility. If it was always an option and a strong possibility at that, why was zoning ever approved in the first place for our neighborhood? It makes our family feel betrayed.
At the end of the day, the only clear outcomes that can save the families in this neighborhood from financial ruin would be for either Vulcan, Knox County, or another entity to buy our homes or the expansion to be declined.
Would love to hear feedback and what actions can be taken here.
Robert
37918
7-O-26-RZ
Robert (37918), June 16, 2026 at 9:48 AM
As a resident of Oak Spring Villas in Halls, I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning case 7-O-26-RZ regarding the 18-acre parcel at 4628 Crippen Road.
The property is designated as both Rural Conservation (RC) and Hillside Ridgetop Protection (HP). Given the environmental sensitivity and the steep slopes associated with an HP designation, I urge the planning committee to carefully weigh these factors against the proposed PR zoning of 3 du/ac.
Furthermore, I have serious concerns regarding the impact on local infrastructure. Crippen Road is a minor collector with a pavement width of only 18-20 feet. Adding upwards of 50 homes would generate hundreds of additional daily vehicle trips, significantly compromising safety at the already hazardous intersection of our subdivision entrance. We expect a comprehensive traffic study to be conducted to fully evaluate the potential impact of this development.
George
37918
7-O-26-RZ
George (37918), June 17, 2026 at 1:51 PM
Greetings,
I have several concerns and they are:
- Safety concerns on Crippen Road given the potential for increased flow. This road is already heavily traveled and is not designed for the current flow of traffic.
- Fire Hydrant Lines; does the existing infrastructure have adequately to handle an increase of services
- Potable Water Lines; Same infrastructure concerns as mentioned immediately above.
- Damaging storm water runoff and potential damage to the Halls Marsh Area
- Safety concerns for traffic due to the close proximity of several entrances and egresses onto Crippen Road ( hidden drives due to existing road and terrain conditions ).
- School bus ( School Children ) safety given the item immediately above.
- Speeding along Crippen Road; unchecked speeding on this road. Crippen is utilized as short cut between Hiskel / Gibbs and Knoxville ( bypassing Halls Cross Roads Intersection )
These are the opportunities that come to my mind. I'm sure that other concerned citizens will provide others that are equally pressing and concerning.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback into the process.
V/r,
GJ D.
Brad
37917
4-A-26-OB
Brad (37917), June 25, 2026 at 10:59 AM
There are many opportunities for this site to be better engaged with the community and intent of the SW code while accomodating the slope. The center of the building where they've proposed the leasing one story space should be removed and incorporated into a central corridor that is open to the public. Commercial spaces that act as an inviting path and connector between the hillside connector and mimosa avenue, Kerns, and Rail to Trail. To accomodate this, building the building taller. This would give a purpose to the stairs which currently dead end into fencing to the enclosed apartment spaces. This can be done well. The architecture is mediocre, but small improvements to the connectivity will go a long way. I'm glad that it has more stone/solid exterior material. Needs to have more architectural interest and a more diverse building style. More external connections, townhouse style units on the lower levels would help a lot on this connecting to the neighborhood as well.
James
37918
7-O-26-RZ
James (37918), June 28, 2026 at 5:14 PM
Concerns
Daniel
37932
7-B-26-UR
Daniel (37932), June 29, 2026 at 11:47 AM
My family was among the first five families to purchase a home in the Hickory Meadows subdivision. Like many of our neighbors, we are first-time homeowners who invested our savings with the expectation of providing a safe and healthy environment for our family.
At no point during the home-buying process were we informed that Vulcan's operations had expanded as far as we now know, nor were we made aware of the potential physical and financial hardships that this expansion could impose on nearby residents.
Our family's concerns are deeply personal. Four members of our household have been diagnosed with asthma, and one has been diagnosed with subglottic stenosis. Had we been provided with complete and transparent information regarding the proximity and potential impacts of this development, we would never have chosen to place our family in this situation.
We work hard to provide for our family, and we believe no family should have to choose between the home they worked so hard to purchase and their health and well-being. We respectfully urge you to reconsider this expansion. If that is not possible, we ask that you consider offering to purchase our property so that our family can relocate to a safer environment.
No one deserves to have their health, financial security, and quality of life placed at risk due to circumstances they were never fully informed about.
Thomas
37932
7-B-26-UR
Thomas (37932), June 29, 2026 at 1:12 PM
Please see attached PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260629131250.pdf
Linda
37920
7-H-26-DP
Linda (37920), June 30, 2026 at 11:55 AM
There is no detention basin/pond or stormwater control shown on the concept plan. All the water from 15 driveways and 15 houses are at a higher elevation than the property at 1508 Tipton Station Road, and this will create a major and substantial increase in water flow that will flow downhill onto 1508 Tipton Station Road. While a 15 inch culvert crosses Sayne Lane, onto 1508 Tipton Station Road, the natural water flow is normal and has been greatly limited by the forest that exists at 0 Tipton Station, wherein once the forest is cleared, and thousands of square feet of newly installed impervious surface cause runoff, the impact of uncontrolled storm water will be substantial. There is also runoff from the road widening project that will increase the existing runoff. Finally, stormwater credit has been afforded to the open space. However, the open space is at an elevation of 910, 900, and 890, which is a higher elevation than all the 15 lots as well as the elevation of the parcel located at 1508 Tipton Station. While the open space is undisturbed, there is still runoff from this open space and it will run to its lowest point creating a substantial increase in stormwater runoff. This concept plan should be denied unless proper stormwater management is included.
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 5, 2026 at 10:54 AM
Please see the attached documents for review to assist in stopping Vulcan Material Company expansion in the DixeLee Quarry.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260705105401.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 5, 2026 at 10:56 AM
Please see the attached documents against the Vulcan DixieLee Quarry expansion.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260705105635.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 5, 2026 at 11:02 AM
Please see the attached documents against the Vulcan DixieLee Quarry expansion.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260705110257.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 5, 2026 at 11:04 AM
Please see another donument with evidence against the Vulcan DixieLee Quarry expansion.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260705110401.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 5, 2026 at 11:17 AM
EVIDENCE TO STOP THE EXPANSION OF DIXIELEE QUARRY AND VULCAN MATERIAL COMPANY
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260705111705.pdf
Donna
37932
7-B-26-UR
Donna (37932), July 5, 2026 at 3:07 PM
Closing Graybeal Road permanently removes an existing public road from the county transportation network. The study evaluates only current traffic, not long-term residential growth. The study evaluates only selected intersections rather than the entire affected road network.
David
37932
7-B-26-UR
David (37932), July 5, 2026 at 3:33 PM
Dust impacts deserve site-specific modeling. Prevailing wind direction should be evaluated. PM2.5 impacts are not discussed. Silica exposure deserves independent review. Dust affects outdoor recreation. Dust affects children's health.
Darian
37932
7-B-26-UR
Darian (37932), July 5, 2026 at 3:35 PM
Water quality monitoring should occur before expansion. Existing wells deserve baseline testing. Future groundwater contamination could be difficult to reverse. The public deserves long-term monitoring commitments.
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 5, 2026 at 5:23 PM
Please see the attached research in opposition to the Vulcan Dixie Lee Quarry expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260705172339.pdf
Dylan
37932
7-B-26-UR
Dylan (37932), July 5, 2026 at 6:18 PM
The traffic study measures only vehicle delay, not overall public safety. The report does not analyze emergency vehicle response times. The report ignores the loss of alternate evacuation routes. School bus routing impacts are not evaluated. Bicycle traffic was not studied. Pedestrian access was not studied. No independent traffic study has been presented.
Donna
37932
7-B-26-UR
Donna (37932), July 5, 2026 at 11:32 PM
Please see attachment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260705233257.pdf
Crystal
37932
7-B-26-UR
Crystal (37932), July 6, 2026 at 7:34 AM
Public roads belong to the public, not private corporations. Permanent road closures should occur only when clearly necessary. The application does not demonstrate why Graybeal Road must be closed. Closing this road reduces future transportation flexibility. The county should not surrender public infrastructure for private industrial expansion. Road closures create permanent consequences long after mining ends.
Justin
37932
7-B-26-UR
Justin (37932), July 6, 2026 at 9:42 AM
The proposal deserves independent groundwater review. East Tennessee karst geology increases uncertainty. Sinkhole risks deserve additional study. Groundwater flow patterns should be modeled. Surface drainage changes require review. Stormwater impacts deserve cumulative analysis.
Crystal
37932
7-B-26-UR
Crystal (37932), July 6, 2026 at 12:34 PM
See attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260706123452.pdf
Jeffrey
37902
7-O-26-RZ
Jeffrey (37902), July 6, 2026 at 2:29 PM
submitted by mail
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260706142940.pdf
Joshua
37932
7-B-26-UR
Joshua (37932), July 6, 2026 at 9:45 PM
Noise increases as operations move closer. Backup alarms affect nearby neighborhoods. Heavy equipment noise should be modeled.
Early morning operations affect residents. Evening operations reduce neighborhood enjoyment. Construction noise differs from operational noise.
Shawn
37921
4-A-26-OB
Shawn (37921), July 7, 2026 at 10:44 AM
I respectfully ask the Planning Commission to deny or postpone this proposal until its impacts are fully evaluated.
Knoxville is already experiencing significant traffic congestion throughout the city, and state and local agencies are investing in transportation improvements to address existing bottlenecks. Approving a major development before those issues are resolved is premature.
I am especially concerned that most north-south traffic in this area relies on the Henley Street Bridge, which already serves as a major bottleneck with few practical alternatives. A project of this scale will add additional traffic to an already strained corridor, affecting commuters, emergency response times, and overall quality of life.
To my knowledge, no comprehensive traffic study has been presented that adequately evaluates the cumulative impact this development will have on the Henley Street Bridge and surrounding road network. The Planning Commission should have this information before making a decision.
Jessica
37917
4-A-26-OB
Jessica (37917), July 7, 2026 at 1:24 PM
This is an iconic area of Knoxville and these apartments will ruin it. It would be wonderful to utilize this space as a public park instead and keep the beauty of our nature which is being demolished daily. Knoxville is drowning in new apartment and house builds. We do not need this, especially on the river. Additionally, the influx of traffic will make it a nightmare to drive through. Has anyone done a traffic study here?
Greg
37920
4-A-26-OB
Greg (37920), July 7, 2026 at 1:30 PM
The project itself seems interesting and the layout seems ok, but since this project will be "on display on the hill top" I think the facade could be more unique and appealing. The trend of "cheap multiple material facades" on apartments and student housing is **exhausting and depressing**. It's bad enough One Riverwalk and 303 Flats already utilizes the bland facades, it'd be great if this project could stand out with a brick/stone facade. It would also be great if this tied in with existing trails (like the new Rails to Trails along the abandoned railway). Maybe there are plans to tie in and I missed that in the plans, but I wanted to mention it.
Matt
37932
7-B-26-UR
Matt (37932), July 7, 2026 at 7:56 PM
Blasting will occur closer to homes than before. Residents deserve independent blasting impact analysis.
Geological conditions vary across every quarry.
Existing compliance does not guarantee future impacts. Ground vibration increases concern as mining approaches residences. Air overpressure impacts deserve independent review.
Crystal
37932
7-B-26-UR
Crystal (37932), July 7, 2026 at 8:06 PM
Comments attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260707200616.pdf
Rachel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37920), July 8, 2026 at 3:57 AM
Comments from the South Waterfront Advisory and Advocacy Group are attached. Please refer also to our comments prior to the June meeting.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260708035720.pdf
Margaret
37919
4-A-26-OB
Margaret (37919), July 8, 2026 at 4:36 AM
What's proposed will be very visible from Gay Street although it is part of the South Knoxville Waterfront District has any thought been given to requiring input from the Downtown Design Review Board?
A new mixed-use multifamily housing and shopping area on the Kerbela site is really an opportunity to win architectural awards. Instead, what is proposed looks rather dismal. Do we really want this looming over our city?
Something in that location that looks more like Regas Square would be a great enhancement:
We'll be living with whatever is built on the hill for decades. Please make it truly exceptional, not just another sprawling apartment complex
Mark
37920
4-A-26-OB
Mark (37920), July 8, 2026 at 9:34 AM
It seems the developer is making some much-needed concessions. There is little to say that hasn't been said about how unfortunate this inherently ugly building will be once it is perched above the beautiful Gay Street bridge and the at-least-dignified Regal Entertainment headquarters. Many have lamented the lining of our river with cheaply built, cookie-cutter, mediocre buildings. This is one more example of this trend, but due to its prominent site, perhaps the most egregious example of them all. Must we resign ourselves to it?
Stephen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stephen (37920), July 8, 2026 at 10:32 AM
As the adjacent neighbor to the proposed project, City Church remains concerned about the lack of engagement with the community regarding the generational impact of this development. While we appreciate the addition of a pedestrian cut-through, this level of deviation from the South Waterfront Plan is considerable. City Church would still like to see the issues surrounding the proposed one-way road and the alleyway cut-through adjacent to our property addressed by the City, and for SWAAG's comments to be taken seriously.
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), July 8, 2026 at 12:32 PM
Once again, after a postponement meant to allow more communication, this developer has not communicated well with the community and its representatives. They are still proposing a massive structure that does not meet the guidelines nor intent of the South Waterfront code. Public access and input seems to be small areas at the edges without real opportunities to be part of this iconic and scenic and very visible hill in downtown Knoxville. A tunnel is a very weak idea costing lots of money and providing very little--an overlook in the middle of apartments?! I ask the Planning committee to reject this development and be patient for a creative and civically-minded partner.
Jessica
37932
7-B-26-UR
Jessica (37932), July 8, 2026 at 3:16 PM
Future residents cannot recover a road once abandoned. The public investment in Graybeal Road should not be discarded lightly. Alternative alignments have not been explored. Maintaining public connectivity should remain a county priority.
Annette
37932
7-B-26-UR
Annette (37932), July 8, 2026 at 3:26 PM
Valid complaints have been posted about the Vulcan expansion. If it is approved, I'd like to see some conditions. Vulcan protected Hickory Creek & the wetlands South of Graybeal in the 2009 expansion. I request the spring, blueline stream, & wetlands on the North side of Graybeal be unaltered and protected. The existing berm on the South side of Graybeal is 50-55 feet tall. I request the new berm along Hickory Meadows Subdivision, and our farm which borders two sides of the expansion be 50-55 feet as well. Taller berms offer protection from falling rock and suppress noise and air vibration. It also acts as a windbreak for fugitive dust. Photo documentation has shown large amounts of dust escaping Vulcan currently. You can imagine the amount that will escape a 20 foot berm. I request Hickory Meadows Subdivision, our house, and our well be structurally evaluated and any subsequent damage be repaired at Vulcans expense. I appreciate that Vulcan has been meeting with its neighbors to find ways to mitigate the unpleasant aspects of a quarry expansion.
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 8, 2026 at 3:42 PM
Please see the leagal agrument to suspend this vote for further evaluation. Thank you for your time and consideration.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260708154238.pdf
Thomas
37929
7-B-26-UR
Thomas (37929), July 8, 2026 at 4:27 PM
Please see the attached letter with additional communications relevant to tomorrow's hearing.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260708162732.pdf
Lori
37932
7-B-26-UR
Lori (37932), July 8, 2026 at 4:34 PM
Dust accumulates on homes and vehicles. Dust affects gardening and landscaping. Dust affects nearby streams. Dust complaints should be anticipated before expansion.
Alan
37920
4-A-26-OB
Alan (37920), July 8, 2026 at 4:54 PM
I appreciate the change to the one story amidst the other higher construction.
I still believe the plan restricts public access to the top of the area and feel the tunnel contributes to isolating the general public from accessing much of the region.
I would like to see more assurances for ground level commercial use.
Lisa
37920
4-A-26-OB
Lisa (37920), July 8, 2026 at 5:51 PM
When I was a little girl I was always captivated by Kerbela Temple. It is an iconic location and known fondly not only by citizens of South Knoxville, but of Knoxville as a whole. The first time I entered the building as an adult, I eagerly walked to the large window facing downtown Knoxville and Gay Street Bridge. This is one of the most beautiful views of Downtown Knoxville and I thought that it was a shame that most folks would not have the opportunity to see this view like I could. Now Knoxville has that opportunity share this wonderful view with the world. SWAAG went to great lengths to make the South Knoxville Water Front area for all to enjoy with their vision plan. Compared to other cities, Knoxville has embarrassingly not made the most of our resources. Let's make this property one that everyone can enjoy. Have 70 percent transparency on the ground floor for restaurants, shops, businesses. Have an easy walking/bike path to connect Kerns Food Hall and the upcoming Art Rails to Trails. If there is connectivity, this area will be well used by all. A destination. I envision magazines, blogs, travel sites and travel agencies having photos of this area advertised as a highlight for our city. To the developer and Knoxville Planning Commission, please adhere to SWAAG's vision and make the most of this beautiful view.
Jessica
37932
7-B-26-UR
Jessica (37932), July 8, 2026 at 6:16 PM
See attached pdf document.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260708181627.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), July 8, 2026 at 8:10 PM
This is the petition against the Vulcan expasion for the Dixie Lee Quarry.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260708201021.pdf
Matthew
37918
7-O-26-RZ
Matthew (37918), July 8, 2026 at 9:49 PM
I have serious concerns with the planned development at 4628 Crippen Road. I believe extensive research is needed regarding the expected water runoff from the proposed development. The Halls Marsh/Beaver Creek will flood from an average rainfall event and it should be noted that the rainfall from 6/27 and 6/28 resulted in standing water on the greenway at a height of 3'-4'. Photos were collected on 7/2. The area simply cannot handle any additional watershed and development of 20 acres would result in significant damage to the Halls Marsh and park.
Additionally, Crippen Road is in a constant state of disrepair. Added private and commercial traffic will eventually force Knox County to address the roadway which has been neglected. Safety is also a concern as the road is routinely traveled 10-15 mph over the posted speed limit.
I also suspect that this property will eventually fall into the Gibbs schools as the zone line has moved further south on Crippen over the last 15 years.
Miriam
37932
7-B-26-UR
Miriam (37932), July 9, 2026 at 8:30 AM
Public roads belong to the public, not private corporations, regardless of the fact a corporation owns land on either side of the roadway. Permanent road closures should occur only when clearly necessary. The application does not demonstrate why Graybeal Road must be closed.
Closing this road reduces future transportation flexibility, to include that of emergency vehicles. The county should not surrender public and publicly funded infrastructure for private industrial expansion. This road closure will create permanent negative consequences long after mining ends.
Gina
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gina (37932), July 9, 2026 at 9:22 AM
Our property at 1520 Grayville Rd. 37932 consist of approximately 4500 ft. brick home built in 2003 on 4 acres. Over this time. The blasting done by bulking has damaged our tile more than once and cracked our drywall, the blaster felt tremendously now Before this proposal. Based on county taxes, our home is worth 1,475,000 which means the market value would be at least 2 million due to the fact that we are in the hotspot of Hardin Valley schools and academy if this expansion is past the value of our property will diminish drastically when I asked the representatives of Vulcan if they were to be purchasing a home with they buy a home in these conditions none of the representatives could give me an answer. Any damage done to our home or any other home affected by this, including the new subdivision of over 200 homes that border the proposal would not be covered by homeowners insurance, it would be a straight denial as blasting is not covered under any homeowner policy. These homes are all built on slabs, and therefore they would most likely all sustain damage. The dust alone covers our vehicles my windows weekly let alone the damage it can do to our bodies by breathing the dust. If this comes closer to us, we we will all sustain damage. If this passes, I feel that welcome should be made to buy our property at our at the market value as of today because it would drop drastically if passed.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 10:02 AM
Increased insect activity due to blasting
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260709100238.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 10:04 AM
Car Damage is a concern. Along with paint damage, dust can and does harm other parts of the car like mechanical components
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260709100439.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 10:24 AM
This violates the Hardin Valley Mobility Plan
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260709102430.pdf
Lorien
37932
7-B-26-UR
Lorien (37932), July 9, 2026 at 10:33 AM
The proposed proximity of mining operations under this application are a threat to the right to quiet enjoyment of property by residents in Hickory Meadows and other adjacent homes. Air quality, noise pollution, blast noise and, significant vibration, and over-pressure are already an issue, and will be amplified significantly if mining is permitted in the parcel past the existing Graybeal Road.
Cumulative industrial noise deserves evaluation.
Outdoor living becomes less enjoyable.
Property use is affected by persistent industrial noise.
Noise mitigation commitments should be enforceable.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 10:37 AM
Expansion will cause a single point of failure
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260709103719.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 10:51 AM
We have a resident that suffers from PTSD
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260709105102.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 11:06 AM
Moving utilities is a costly procedure and the residents do not wish to foot the bill.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260709110627.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 11:43 AM
Eagle on property
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260709114312.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 11:48 AM
Formal notice to the commission of possible Fair Housing Act violation and American with Disabilities Act. A resident has long document Autism and Sensory Disorder.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 11:51 AM
Formal notice to the commission that resident have significant evidence of extreme dust disbursement from Vulcan's Dixie Lee Quarry
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 11:53 AM
Formal notice to the commission of documented protected animals in the area. Including but not limited to Bats, Turtles, Eagles, etc.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 11:57 AM
Formal Notice to the commission of concerns over current tax appraisals and the appeals process.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 11:59 AM
Formal notice to the commission that residents have concerns with emergency response times.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 12:01 PM
Formal notice to the commission of residential issue under the Doctrine of Incompatible Use
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), July 9, 2026 at 12:03 PM
Formal Notice to commission that residents have concerns over the June 17th blast that by inspector report says "possible or potential violation".
Steve
37932
7-B-26-UR
Steve (37932), July 13, 2026 at 11:55 AM
I do not believe Vulcan Materials has done an adequate job of making the surrounding community aware of the proposed quarry expansion.
A project of this size, especially one involving blasting, crushing, and the potential for airborne dust, deserves much greater transparency. Quarry operations can impact residents beyond the immediate property line. Blasting vibrations, noise, and dust can travel significant distances, and many residents are concerned about what long-term exposure to airborne particulate matter could mean for their homes, families, and health.
What is especially concerning is that only a limited number of residents appear to have received postcards about this expansion. I live less than a quarter mile from the proposed quarry area and I did not receive any notification.
How can a community make informed decisions when many of the people who may be directly affected are not even aware of what is being proposed?
Residents deserve proper notice, open communication, and the opportunity to ask questions before a major industrial expansion moves forward in their backyard. This is about transparency, accountability, and protecting the quality of life for everyone who calls this community home.
Annette
37932
7-B-26-UR
Annette (37932), July 14, 2026 at 2:07 PM
See attached PDF. Please advise if you have any problems opening this PDF document
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260714140704.pdf
Thomas
37932
7-B-26-UR
Thomas (37932), July 16, 2026 at 9:02 AM
See attached File
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260716090241.pdf
Applicant
7-B-26-UR
Applicant Correspondence
Submitted during the meeting
submitted at meeting
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260717100111.pdf
applicant
Submitted during the meeting
Applicant
7-B-26-UR
Applicant Correspondence
July 17, 2026 at 3:22 PM
Please see the attached from the Applicant.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260717152246.pdf
applicant
Sarah
37914
8-C-26-SU
Sarah (37914), July 20, 2026 at 9:51 AM
Loves Creek Road has a high volume of traffic. Most do not adhere to the speed limit. Is a traffic studying required or road improvements?
Troy
37938
8-C-26-PA
Troy (37938), July 21, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Please consider the wildlife and watershed in the heavily wooded are of this property. From my backyard I see and enjoy many deer, turkey, groundhogs, squirrels and bird life. There are many culverts that empty to this land to prevent flooding in the Garfield Estates subdivision. A tributary is located in the lowest part of the property to mitigate large amounts of water shed during heavy rain storms.
Greta
37917
8-A-26-SU
Greta (37917), July 21, 2026 at 10:57 AM
As a nearby neighbor of this property for almost 20 years, I would like to record my enthusiastic support for this proposed reuse. The building has been vacant in my time here. What better new purpose than a business that will provide jobs, bring the community together, and stuff us all with bread? The City and County have been working hard to help align our zoning needs with modern realities. I look forward to this project's success.
Brittany
37917
8-A-26-SU
Brittany (37917), July 21, 2026 at 11:35 AM
I am writing in support of the conversion of 808 Winona St. Parkridge is a special neighborhood with several small locally-owned businesses that only make the neighborhood more vibrant. Allowing 808 Winona to further add to the neighborhood would increase our ability to shop local, interact with our neighbors, and restore the functionality of a very cool historic structure. I really hope we can see this come to fruition as I am very excited to see continued renewal in Parkridge.
Casey
37917
8-A-26-SU
Casey (37917), July 21, 2026 at 2:49 PM
I'd like to express my support for this application. This is exactly the kind of neighborhood development Parkridge needs. As a member of the community and neighborhood organization, I'm excited to see residents taking an interest in enabling more local businesses and mixed use space in the area. Thank you for considering this application.
Hannah
37917
8-A-26-SU
Hannah (37917), July 21, 2026 at 3:39 PM
I have been a resident of Parkridge Neighborhood since 2019. I have loved watching the area change with Husmus and Ricky's. I visit Husmus several times a week for coffee, walking every time right by 808 Winona and have always wondered what it used to be and what it could be. So I feel very supportive of the use it could have and even more excited to know that the wish is for it to be used for local bakers to make it into a little neighborhood bakery. It is very in the theme of the knit of the neighborhood which is very family oriented, warm, and artistic. I would be very happy for it to develop further in this way.
Marie
37924
8-C-26-SU
Marie (37924), July 21, 2026 at 5:13 PM
Do traffic analysis. Road needs traffic light at back entrance of Walmart. Loves Creek needs to be widen. Can be dangerous at times. New apartment units have many units for rent at $1600 to $2000 a month. Many cannot afford them.
Jonathan
37917
8-A-26-SU
Jonathan (37917), July 21, 2026 at 8:01 PM
I have been struck in recent months by the depth and reach of enthusiasm, both in Parkridge and beyond, for Husmus Studio and Ricky's Neighborhood Pub, two businesses with an ethos very much in line with the two local bakeries sited in the Applicant's proposal. It is remarkable that when the right tone is struck for a neighborhood that longstanding narratives of businesses not being able to survive in X location can fly out the window. Indeed, I have heard residents talking about Parkridge finally getting its due with this little corridor burgeoning at Washington and Winona. This proposal seems canny, well-timed, and in the perfect spot. -Jonathan B.
Aaron
37917
8-A-26-SU
Aaron (37917), July 22, 2026 at 8:38 AM
I'm writing in support of this zoning change. I live a block away and am excited about the possibility of this building becoming something that will benefit our neighborhood. It's already adjacent to our commercial corridor, which is finally beginning to thrive. All the neighbors I've talked to about this are in full support of this zoning change.
Sarah
37917
8-A-26-SU
Sarah (37917), July 23, 2026 at 12:37 PM
YES PLEASE! I'm the owner of Husmus Studio, a coffee shop and home goods store down the street from the building requesting rezoning. I have loved being in this neighborhood as a business owner (2 years) and resident (6 years). To see another vacant building become available for a fellow small business would mean so much to this community and this neighborhood. I would love to see a daytime business like a bakery be open in that space.
Wesley
37709
8-SE-26-C
Wesley (37709), July 23, 2026 at 3:27 PM
While it is great to see sidewalks along Loves Creek Rd throughout this development, it isn't ideal that the parking for this project has been placed at the front of the property, with the multifamily buildings set back. It would be great to see the parking and multifamily switch places so that the actual buildings front the street and new sidewalks similar to how the new Jewel apartments on Washington Pike do. This would not only improve access/walkability to the project/units and follow better urban design principles, but also make this road feel narrower than it is because the buildings would be closer to vehicles passing by, helping naturally slow traffic. In this vein, it would also be great to see some sort of marked crossing with flashing lights where the sidewalks end on both the Buffet Mill and Loves Creek side so that people can cross the street more safely. Even though there aren't any connections the crossings would lead to, it would at least help facilitate a safer crossing for those who do walk along the shoulders of these roads. Please consider these changes as conditions to approval if the site allows. Thanks!
Heidi
37917
8-A-26-SU
Heidi (37917), July 23, 2026 at 9:48 PM
I am writing to express my strong support for the special use request for 808 Winona Street. Converting this long-vacant former dentist office into a small, locally owned bakery is exactly the kind of thoughtful redevelopment that strengthens neighborhoods while preserving their character.
This project represents an investment in neighborhood revitalization, supports local entrepreneurs, and helps address the lack of fresh food options in East Knoxville. Small businesses like neighborhood bakeries create gathering places, encourage walkability, and contribute to the long-term vitality of our community.
From discussions I have held, it seems clear that the neighborhood is united in its support of this special use request. Residents recognize the value of bringing this underutilized property back into active use in a way that serves the neighborhood and surrounding area, and enhances quality of life.
I respectfully encourage you to approve the special use request for and support this opportunity to invest in East Knoxville, local small business, and the continued revitalization of Parkridge.
Thomas
37929
7-B-26-UR
Thomas (37929), July 24, 2026 at 4:05 PM
Please see the attached from the Applicant.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260724160522.pdf
Applicant
7-B-26-UR
Applicant Correspondence
July 24, 2026 at 4:07 PM
Please see the attached from the Applicant.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260724160702.pdf
applicant
Robert
37917
8-A-26-SU
Robert (37917), July 24, 2026 at 9:06 PM
My interest is piqued each time I hear rumors of a new food and drink establishment taking root in the Parkridge neighborhood. Being retired, I enjoy any excuse to get out of the house, without having to brave four lanes of motor vehicle traffic just to get a bite to eat. Please move application 8-A-26-SU forward.
Jake
37917
8-D-26-SU
Jake (37917), July 24, 2026 at 10:15 PM
Attached
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260724221501.pdf
Bonnie
37917
8-A-26-SU
Bonnie (37917), July 26, 2026 at 12:56 PM
Hello, I am writing in support of this zoning change request. This is adjacent to a commercial corridor in Parkridge which is active and growing. I feel this rezone will provide a great resource to the neighborhood and community. The neighbors I have spoken to about this are in favor of this rezone. We are excited about the support the rezone will provide to aligned local small businesses.
Robert
37918
8-C-26-RZ
Robert (37918), July 27, 2026 at 5:07 PM
I am extremely worried about this property being changed due to the Fact that TVA High Voltage power lines which require a 75 ROW pass over the property in question. And a creek on the other side that floods during heavy rain that can't be averted. And there will be no room for someone to build. I am concerned for the SAFETY of all parties.
Applicant
7-B-26-UR
Applicant Correspondence
July 27, 2026 at 5:23 PM
Please see the attached from the applicant.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260727172319.pdf
applicant
SCOTT
37924
8-A-26-PA
SCOTT (37924), July 27, 2026 at 9:59 PM
This property was recently rezoned and it should stay as is. I live next door to this location.
Lance
37918
8-F-26-RZ
Lance (37918), July 28, 2026 at 7:45 PM
Hello,
Emory road is already extremely dangerous due to the amount of stopping and going into neighborhoods. There is already another development that is going in across the street. I request not allowing this dense of a project. It is not safe and the area's infrastructure can not take it.
Claire
37917
8-A-26-SU
Claire (37917), July 29, 2026 at 8:01 AM
I live just a few houses down from this location and I am in full support of this proposal! The space has sat vacant for a while, and the owners have taken great care to fix it up so that we can welcome a small local business into the space. This would be a great addition to our community!
Shelbi
37921
8-A-26-SU
Shelbi (37921), July 29, 2026 at 8:18 AM
I strongly support this addition to the Parkridge neighborhood. The incredible positive impact that businesses like Ricky's and Husmus have had is demonstrative of the importance of gathering places in and around neighborhoods.
Andrew
37917
8-A-26-SU
Andrew (37917), July 29, 2026 at 9:58 AM
I am a neighbor who lives less than a block away from the proposed bakery and am in full support of the proposal. These establishments on the edges of our neighborhood - Orange Hat/Baker Boy pizza, Likewise, Husmus, Retrolocal, Ricky's, the YMCA, Caswell Park - make our neighborhood more lively, engaged, and safer.
Jeffrey
37920
8-F-26-DP
Jeffrey (37920), July 29, 2026 at 4:58 PM
I oppose this development as I see nothing being done to expand the rot 33 roadway. This will cause more traffic issues around the school which already experiences problems. It will also cause noise pollution especially during construction. I bought my property because it is quiet and not congested which this development will destroy.
Jordan
37920
8-F-26-DP
Jordan (37920), July 29, 2026 at 11:11 PM
First, Goff nor Berry Road can handle the traffic associated with a 257-unit development. Our roads are little more than 1.5 lanes, with us often needing to pull off to let other small vehicles pass, and they are usually under maintained in regard to upkeep and weather events. Secondly, Mount Olive Elementary School does not have the additional resources to handle the amount of students that would come along with a 257-unit development.
Also, I would just like to add that public forums like this being held mid-workday in the middle of the week is absurd. It gives the illusion that you all don't actually want to hear opinions from the community.
Thank you for your time.
Jonathan
37918
8-A-26-UR
Jonathan (37918), July 30, 2026 at 9:31 AM
Please deny this commercial sports complex. My fiance Brittany and I recently purchased our home in the adjacent Casa Bella subdivision, and this development threatens to trap our neighborhood in daily, unmitigated traffic.
Having previously lived next to a complex of this exact scale, I have seen firsthand how "tournament overlap" consistently overwhelms parking capacity. Arriving teams park before departing teams leave, which will inevitably force overflow parking directly onto Maloneyville Road and into Casa Bella. Because Washington Pike lacks sidewalks, this creates a severe pedestrian safety hazard.
Approving a multi-field complex on a two-lane road without a mandatory Traffic Impact Study and dedicated turn lanes is irresponsible. I urge you to reject this application or strictly mandate road infrastructure upgrades and lighting/noise curfews before any approval.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260730093153.pdf
Kacy
37924
8-B-26-DP
Kacy (37924), July 30, 2026 at 11:14 AM
Please consider proper planning before adding additional houses for Carter Mill Dr. Currently, there are at least a thousand cars a day passing on a road that is made for 1.5 cars. My vehicle was totaled on this road last week, and I have had several "close" incidents of getting hit head-on. Carter Mill Rd doesn't even have lines. This is a huge safety issue and must be addressed before adding additional housing.
Kathy
37923
8-C-26-DP
Kathy (37923), July 30, 2026 at 11:51 AM
Will you please address the added traffic pressure on Gleason! The road is already busy and the City/County need to do THEIR part to develop THEIR roads to support developers. Adding to the width of the road and adding a turning lane to my subdivision would be a huge help! We like the development, but the roads surrounding our area need to be develped too!
Thank you.
KS/DS
Steve
37932
7-B-26-UR
Steve (37932), July 30, 2026 at 12:32 PM
My family owned the property years ago that Hickory Meadows is located. There was 2 large sink holes on the land. You could drop a rock and it took at least 6-8 seconds before you could hear a splash. We lost a cow in the hole. One day the sink hole closed up . There needs to be studies done to see if blasting that close could cause the sink holes to open back up and cause damage to houses in Hickory Meadows or even cause injury or death.
Donna
37920
8-F-26-DP
Donna (37920), July 31, 2026 at 8:53 AM
Please do Not allow this to be approved! South Knoxville traffic is already horrible, our schools are already suffering and this will only over crowd our precious elementary schools, where learning should be a top priority as it's the foundation to every child's education!!!
Nathaniel
37919
8-C-26-SU
Nathaniel (37919), July 31, 2026 at 10:10 AM
See the attachment explaining the reasons to deny this special use request and concept plan.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260731101045.pdf
Rachel
37917
8-A-26-SU
Rachel (37917), July 31, 2026 at 10:16 AM
We live 1 block away from this property and LOVE the idea of a bakery or small business moving into this space.
We've spoken to 6-7 of our neighbors in the surrounding houses and everyone was excited by the prospect of more local business moving to the block that has slowly begun to develop in Parkridge.
The entire neighborhood rallied around the opening of Ricky's, Husmus Studio, and Retro Local this past year.
With a bakery across the street from that budding hub, it'd create an even greater sense of community and give us more spaces to gather and support local business.
Resoundingly in favor of this move and can't wait!
Sarah
37920
8-F-26-DP
Sarah (37920), July 31, 2026 at 5:06 PM
We cannot keep overdeveloping the small amount of rural area we have left. The roads cannot handle the traffic that comes with this type of development. The elementary school could not handle the influx of students. Nobody living in the community has expressed any positive feeling towards this that I have seen or heard from.
Heather
37920
8-F-26-DP
Heather (37920), August 1, 2026 at 8:58 AM
I'm a resident in Sevier Meadows right next the the proposed development. Mensana Investment, do not complete their projects, we have empty lots that have not been sold or attempted to be build on. Then what was supposed to be to phase 3 was not even finished due to the large rock/boulders ungrounded. There are huge mounds dirt and rock on the backside of Bayonet. Mt. Olive Elementry can't handle this type of traffic. I do not recommend this planning.
Barry
37924
8-SB-26-F
Barry (37924), August 2, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Before anymore homes are allowed to be developed and accessed from Carter Mill RD, the remainder of the narrow road section to the west should have to be widened and paved to meet current county requirements as the traffic now results in numerous vehicles narrowly missing each other posing a serious safety hazard. The intersection of Carter Mill Rd and McCubbins needs to be reworks as it is so tight only one vehicle can turn at a time if on coming traffic wants to access the intersection.
Applicant
7-B-26-UR
Applicant Correspondence
August 3, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Please see the attached from the Applicant.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260803125956.pdf
applicant
Megan
37922
8-SA-26-C
Megan (37922), August 3, 2026 at 1:51 PM
A development of this density is not compatible with the surrounding area. The entry/exit directly across from Bexhill's entry/exit will create additional vehicular hazard and danger on Ebenezer Road. Further, pedestrian traffic such as children walking to and from school would be further endangered with another high-density development.
Rachel
36922
8-SA-26-C
Rachel (36922), August 3, 2026 at 3:43 PM
As a long time resident in the Bexhill community right across Ebenezer, this planned development would be detrimental to our community in several ways. The traffic on Ebenezer over the past few years has increased significantly and I’ve noticed more accidents, excessive speeding, and increased difficulty navigating the area. The crosswalks that were installed on Ebenezer are rather pointless because of a pedestrian hits the button, traffic never stops! It’s dangerous! The increased traffic and lack of infrastructure has caused a very dangerous road, Ebenezer, and made it exceptionally difficult for residents to navigate their own community. I strong oppose this proposed development and hope the community voices their opposition as well. The road cannot handle this kind of development and nothing is being done to add safety measures or to protect the residents who already live here! I ask that you consider my comment in your decision to approve or disapprove the proposed development. I, and my family, are strongly opposed to this development and feel this will make our community even more dangerous than it already is due to traffic, number of residents, and lack of infrastructure and obedience of road and traffic laws by the increasing number of people in the area. Thank you for your consideration!
Wesley
37709
8-SB-26-F
Wesley (37709), August 3, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Please consider a pedestrian connection to the adjacent Carter Community Pool, either through an extension of the sidewalk along Carter Mill Dr. or via a new pedestrian pathway somewhere between lots 437-443 that runs into the back side of the parking area of the pool, as a condition of approval. A host of excellent and expansive pedestrian improvements/connections have been made throughout the Carter community within the past few years, so this opportunity should not be overlooked. Thanks!
Mike
37923
8-C-26-DP
Mike (37923), August 3, 2026 at 6:01 PM
I live across the street, and there are already times of day that it is quite difficult to turn left onto Gleason. If at all possible, some turn lanes need to be added on Gleason, which is becoming a nightmare due to poor planning over time. Turn lanes would at least keep traffic from backing up. That being said, I have no problem with the proposed new houses. Just please be careful where you put their access to Gleason Rd. Putting the entrance to the new subdivision right across the street from where Ashton Ct resident turn onto Gleason would be making an already bad situation worse. People fly down Gleason in both directions, and denser units will lead to more car accidents if ways aren't found to create more traffic gaps on the road.
Wesley
37709
8-A-26-UR
Wesley (37709), August 3, 2026 at 6:18 PM
I am in support of approving this Use on Review! This area is sorely lacking in parks/public amenities/sports facilities, and this would be a step in the right direction to remedy that. If a pedestrian connection is possible to the Casa Bella neighborhood via the KUB pump station lot located within the neighborhood at 4629 Bella Capri Ln, then that should be explored/encouraged. Considering there are, at minimum, three large new neighborhoods/neighborhood expansions being constructed within a few miles of this proposal, the need for this new amenity, which is a vital asset in strengthening growing communities, is more important than ever! Thank you all for considering this in your decision.
Janet
37938
8-D-26-PA
Janet (37938), August 3, 2026 at 11:26 PM
I would like to know if there are plans to preserve the integrity of the property around the historic Gray bell spring. The immediate area around the spring is overgrown, but there are remnants of stone substructure around the part of the spring that is closest to McCloud Road. The spring appears to seep up to the surface at several areas on the west end of this property.
Lindsey
37922
8-SA-26-C
Lindsey (37922), August 4, 2026 at 7:59 AM

I understand this development may already be moving forward, but I hope you'll consider the concerns of those of us who already live in this area.
I live directly across from the proposed development. Traffic is already a major issue, and turning left out of our neighborhood has become increasingly difficult and, at times, unsafe. This area has experienced significant growth over the past several years, with numerous apartment complexes and new developments adding thousands of vehicles to roads that were never designed to handle this volume of traffic.
Our schools are also becoming increasingly overcrowded. It feels like new developments continue to be approved before the necessary infrastructure is in place to support them.
I'm not opposed to growth, but growth should be planned responsibly. Roads, traffic improvements, and public infrastructure should keep pace with development, not lag years behind it.
My family chose to live here because we believed this would remain a community with thoughtful, manageable growth. I respectfully ask Knox County to prioritize the needs of current residents by ensuring there is a clear plan to address traffic, road capacity, and infrastructure before approving additional large housing developments.
Please put the people who already live here first by planning for sustainable growth that protects both current and future residents.
Thank you for your consideration
Carol
37923
8-SC-26-C
Carol (37923), August 4, 2026 at 8:55 AM
I live in Briarglen subdivision, which will back up to this proposed development. The creek that runs between my property and the proposed development has widened and deepened since I have lived here due to out of control development. This new development will only increase the amount of runoff into the creek, which will result in more erosion. What does the developer plan to do to minimize the effects on neighboring properties?
Daniella
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Daniella (37938), August 4, 2026 at 10:18 AM
I have serious concerns about the impact this proposed development would have on existing residents and infrastructure in our community.
Many of the roads in this area are already extremely narrow, some to the point that it can be difficult for two vehicles to safely pass one another. Traffic during normal school and work commute times is already becoming a significant source of frustration for residents. Adding a substantial number of additional homes and vehicles raises an important question: are our existing roads, schools, and emergency services actually equipped to accommodate this level of additional growth?
Growth should not be evaluated solely on whether additional development can physically fit within an area. The impact on the people who already live here should matter as well. Additional congestion and added minutes to residents' daily commutes are not beneficial to their quality of life, particularly when the infrastructure serving the area is already strained.
Before approving additional development, I believe there should be a clear and realistic assessment of roadway capacity and safety, school capacity, emergency response capabilities, and the cumulative traffic impact of developments that have already been approved or constructed, not simply the impact of this project considered in isolation.
Alex
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Alex (37938), August 4, 2026 at 11:17 AM
I am opposed to rezoning application 8-H-26-RZ.
I live off Hill Road, and it is already difficult to safely leave my neighborhood because of the traffic on Fort Sumter Road. Adding approximately 50 new homes would bring well over 100 additional vehicles, plus school buses, delivery trucks, and visitors, to roads that are already struggling to handle current traffic.
I am also concerned about increased stormwater runoff and erosion. Developing this property could increase runoff and create drainage issues that may affect nearby homes and properties.
Finally, this area has always been a rural community. Many of us chose to live here because of its open space and low-density character. This development would permanently change the feel of our community and set a precedent for more high-density growth in the future.
I respectfully ask the Planning Commission to deny this rezoning request and preserve the safety, infrastructure, and rural character of our community.
Laura
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Laura (37938), August 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Please no more subdivision near McCloud. The road is like a main highway anymore and we have to pull out of driveways and pray for our life as people fly down this road like it is a drag strip. Also we have wildlife that lost ma y homes when the fruit and berry patch was sold so where else will these other animals go as we are taking all the land from them and they have no place to go!!! Someone needs to just sit in Halls on Friday evening and see all the traffic madness. We are full and have no room at the schools either!!!. You all just look at the money and not what is best for the community. Please don't add more subdivision to our community.
Whitney
37920
8-C-26-SU
Whitney (37920), August 4, 2026 at 2:13 PM
Please deny this special use request for the following reasons:
- There is currently a historic home on this property that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The site plan says existing building to be removed. There is an approval process to follow for demolishing a historic building. That process should be reviewed before anything is approved at planning commission.
- I do not live in this area but the comments I hear from those that do is this road is not suited for the additional access points and traffic without some additional amount of rework on the road.
- The property also has two water ways nearby and the amount of impervious surface seems inappropriate given the site conditions. It also appears some of the buildings and impervious areas are in the riparion buffer zones. The amount of parking and clear area needed for this development will remove a great deal of tree canopy as well.
- Housing is needed and I support density in areas that make sense such as areas that have good access to public transit and are walkable. This area is much more suited for single family residential or low-density residential such as townhomes. The zoning already allows for this more appropriate type of housing and has a lower demand for parking & impervious area.
Amanda
37920
8-F-26-DP
Amanda (37920), August 4, 2026 at 2:41 PM
Did you ever do a traffic study to see how this would affect the Maloney Rd underpass? I'm assuming not, but I'll find out.
Deanna
37938
8-C-26-PA
Deanna (37938), August 4, 2026 at 4:36 PM
Please see attached comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260804163610.pdf
8-F-26-DP
ROB (37920), August 4, 2026 at 7:50 PM
I am also a resident of Sevier Meadows subdivision. We moved to this location 5yrs ago and loved everything about it. Tucked away behind Alcoa hwy; it was quiet, serene, low traffic, etc. Since then, Maryville pk has turned into a mini hwy..same goes for Gov. John Severe. As Heather had stated, the original project was never finished as proposed, the schools cannot handle the extra students this would bring, our roads cannot handle the influx of more traffic either. Stop over developing all of the rural areas for cash sake! Lastly, the public are wise to your plans; intentionally scheduling thr meeting mid-day while you know everyone will be at work, you don't want anyone there in hopes no one will bat an eye! Highly suspicious and ridiculous. I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS PROJECT. IF this comes to pass, will probably look to move outta here....
Robert
37932
7-B-26-UR
Robert (37932), August 5, 2026 at 1:41 PM
I have lived on Pittman Drive for 30 + years. Our house shakes every time Vulcan blasts in their existing quarry. Vulcan purchased their property 20 + years ago and should have started this proposed project then not after 100 + houses have been built with more planned for the area. Now Vulcan wants to close or move Graybeal Road closer to Hickory Meadows in order to connect to Buttermilk Road. The grade difference would make it impossible to exit onto Buttermilk in an ice storm (opinion need engineer to verify). The current situation is difficult to exit as we experienced this past winter. Additional consideration needs to be regarding emergency services and times.
Rita
37914
8-C-26-SU
Rita (37914), August 5, 2026 at 1:50 PM
This proposed apartment complex has too many buildings for this site. The drawings show very simple box designs which are out of character for a woodland area. There are not enough parking spaces allotted per apartment. Guest parking is almost non-existent. The traffic flow along Loves Creek Road is busy, especially during "rush hours." An all-way stop sign at the intersection of Buffat Mill and Loves Creek will help, but probably is not enough. The traffic will just stack up at the proposed all way stop sign on Loves Creek Road during "rush hours" just as it already does at the railroad tunnel near the intersection of Rutledge Pike and Loves Creek Road. Turning in and out of the proposed apartment driveways will be dangerous and rear end collisions are likely. I live about a mile away from this site and see it frequently. I know that it needs redevelopment but this proposal is not right for this site. Reduce the number of units; increase the resident parking spaces; change the driveway so it feeds only into and out of Buffat Mill Road; change the timing of the traffic signals at Millertown Pike and Rutledge Pike so that deliberate gaps are created in the traffic the goes past this site and allows people to safely enter and exit; develop a more woodland appearance to the buildings so they look like they fit in. Create some charm to how it looks when people go past it and you will have no trouble with resident turnover and empty apartments.
Jennifer
37922
8-SA-26-C
Jennifer (37922), August 5, 2026 at 1:56 PM
Ebenezer is already overly congest at many point in the day, especially with school pick up and drop offs. The amount of traffice trying to beat out speeding cars while trying to exit and enter their neighbohoods is extremely dangerous to all the students who have to walk down and cross that dangerous road. Adding another entrance/exit right by the crosswalk at an already congested spot will exponentially rose the risk to children and family who have to walk. This area has an extremley large community of walkers of all ages. With children being of the biggest concern, Blue Grass Elementary can not handle another strain on it resources imposed by the influx of families in the affordable housing units opened down the road just last school year. We do not want this, it will not enrich our community/neighborhoods, it will only drain our BGE resources and increase the safety risk to our children and families.
LORETTA
37920
8-F-26-DP
LORETTA (37920), August 5, 2026 at 2:13 PM
Please do not build these! There is so much traffic now and what about the wildlife where are they going to live? The noise from building , we will be disturbed for months! This is just a bad idea!
Blair
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Blair (37938), August 5, 2026 at 11:11 PM
I am opposed to the development of this property. I believe three homes per acre is incompatible with the surrounding community and exceeds what the existing roads, schools, drainage, and infrastructure can reasonably support.
I would like to see reports/actions on the following:
Transportation impact
Stormwater management
Utility, water and sewer capacity
Mccloud rd and Fort Sumter infrastructure - needs to be widened
Halls schools current capacity versus potential enrollment
Potential cumulative impact from recently approved development on Maynardville hwy
Amanda
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Amanda (37938), August 6, 2026 at 6:05 AM
I am not opposed to growth or development in Halls. I understand our community will continue to grow. My concern is whether this particular proposal is the right density for this location and whether our existing infrastructure can support it.
This proposal would place 51 homes on approximately 17 acres -”about three homes per acre. I ask the Planning Commission to carefully consider not only the impact of this development alone, but also the cumulative impact of other recently approved developments in the Halls area.
Specifically, I ask that you consider:
* The current and projected capacity of Halls schools, as these developments are built out.
* The traffic impact on McCloud Road, Fort Sumter, and Maynardville Highway, where residents already experience significant congestion during school drop-off, dismissal, and peak commuting hours.
* Whether the existing road network can safely and efficiently handle the additional daily traffic generated by 51 new homes.
* Whether improvements to roads and infrastructure should be in place before approving additional high-density residential development.
Growth should be planned responsibly. I believe this proposal is simply too dense for the existing roads, schools, and infrastructure serving this area.
I respectfully ask the Commission to deny this rezoning request as proposed or require a lower-density development that better fits the capacity of our community.
Thank you for your time and your consideration.
8-A-26-SU
Bre (37914), August 6, 2026 at 9:36 AM
The space would make a great bakery! The building is the perfect size. It's a good set up and location to be an asset to the neighborhood.
Applicant
7-B-26-UR
Applicant Correspondence
August 6, 2026 at 11:28 AM
Please see the attached Revised Application on behalf of the Applicant.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260806112809.pdf
applicant
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), August 6, 2026 at 12:27 PM
Please see the attached proposal submitted to Vulcan Material Company by CARE at the July 28th meeting.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260806122757.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), August 6, 2026 at 12:32 PM
Please see the attached nocument for negotiation between CARE and Vulcan July 28th. 2026.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260806123255.pdf
Kayla
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Kayla (37938), August 6, 2026 at 1:34 PM
Halls is already overflowing and traffic is overwhelming as is. To continue to build in such a small space can't not help the people of Halls
Matthew
37902
4-A-26-OB
Matthew (37902), August 6, 2026 at 2:05 PM
South Knoxville has been on such a positive growth path and it is amazing to see how the community has blossomed. New developments continue to bring the area to life and give Knoxville the spark that has attracted so many. As a downtown resident, I would like to see more people join our community and continue to support the businesses and people that make this place amazing. I support this project and hope local leadership will do the same!
Taylor
37902
4-A-26-OB
Taylor (37902), August 6, 2026 at 2:08 PM
South Knoxville and Downtown are in real need of a 55+ active adult community, and this site is well-positioned to fill that gap. Beyond meeting that housing need, this development would bring year-round residents to South Knoxville. This is the kind of consistent, day-to-day foot traffic that local retailers depend on to stay in business. It's also worth noting that this site currently generates no tax revenue for the City of Knoxville, while the proposed development stands to bring in millions of dollars in tax revenue once built out. Finally, I want to recognize that the developer has made substantial changes to the plan in direct response to feedback from SWAG, showing a genuine willingness to work with the community rather than around it. For these reasons, I urge approval of this project.
Costen
37902
4-A-26-OB
Costen (37902), August 6, 2026 at 2:23 PM
I support the proposed redevelopment at 315 Kerbela Ave (Case 4-A-26-OB). South Knoxville and downtown would benefit from additional housing options, particularly a 55+ active adult community that allows residents to remain engaged in the area while freeing up housing elsewhere in the market. Bringing more year-round residents to South Knoxville will help support local businesses and retailers. Additionally, this property currently generates no property tax revenue, while the proposed redevelopment would create significant new tax revenue that can benefit the community. I also appreciate that the developer has worked with stakeholders and made meaningful revisions to the plan in response to feedback from SWAG. I encourage the Planning Commission to approve this proposal
Stephanie
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Stephanie (37938), August 6, 2026 at 2:46 PM
As someone who works with the school system and also who lives on Fort Sumter. I would ask that you reconsider. We cannot continue to add houses and traffic to our infrastructure. Halls is losing its small community feel. We moved here for the community
Carter
37922
4-A-26-OB
Carter (37922), August 6, 2026 at 4:12 PM
I support the proposed redevelopment of 315 Kerbela Avenue (Case 4-A-26-OB). This project provides an opportunity to bring much-needed 55+ active adult housing to South Knoxville while adding year-round residents who will help support local businesses and strengthen the surrounding community.The property currently does not generate property tax revenue for the City of Knoxville. Redeveloping the site will create significant long-term tax revenue while putting an underutilized property to productive use.
I also appreciate that the developer has worked with the community and made revisions to the proposal in response to feedback from SWAG. Their willingness to collaborate demonstrates a commitment to creating a project that benefits both current and future residents.
For these reasons, I encourage the Planning Commission to approve this proposal.
Robert
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Robert (37938), August 6, 2026 at 5:17 PM
I oppose the rezoning. These roads can barely handle the traffic currently here . The infrastructure is not there to support 3 houses per acre
Larry
37918
8-A-26-UR
Larry (37918), August 6, 2026 at 6:17 PM
See PDF attachment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260806181716.pdf
Misty
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Misty (37938), August 6, 2026 at 9:28 PM
We do not need another subdivision in Halls. Our roads cannot handle more traffic. Our roads are in poor condition and already are at max capacity. Our schools are at max capacity. It takes 30 minutes going Emory road at 4:00pm on a Thursday to get to the interstate, and going through halls to 640 is just as bad. Until there is a solution to our infrastructure and schools VOTE NO. We have had a huge subdivisions on Pedigo Rd, on Emory, and on McCloud in the past 3 years with 3 homes per acre. It's too many developments. Property tax have went up, the amount of homes being collected on have enlarged, but yet the money is not being used to make our roads and schools match the influx of people that will be using them.
Elijah
37902
4-A-26-OB
Elijah (37902), August 7, 2026 at 9:28 AM
I am in support of this project. There are many benefits that it will bring to the city and the South Knoxville area.
1. This will immediately add to the number of permanent residents in South Knoxville. Businesses will benefit from this, organizations will benefit from this, and the city will as well.
2. This site currently produces roughly $1000 in property taxes for the city of Knoxville; the proposed development will bring in millions.
3. South Knoxville and Downtown need an active 55+ adult community. There is an assisted living facility off James White Pkwy. I am sure they do great things, but nothing in the area that will be like this. According to the 2024 U.S. Census Bureau. "Age and Sex." American Community Survey, the City of Knoxville has a population of 55+ adults of 46,659. Nearly 1/4 of the total population.
Thank you for your consideration.
Tiffany
37924
8-SB-26-C
Tiffany (37924), August 7, 2026 at 10:57 AM
We truly do not need 121 more homes in this area. They are already building homes at the other end of Carter Mill near the pool and now this is planned. New and old homes are barely selling right now as it is, there is no need for more. Widening Carter Mill Road to the west to the McCubbins Road intersection needs to happen now and even more if this plan is fully approved. Also needed in this area is a right turn lane at the I-40W ramp off Strawberry Plains. More homes in the area means more traffic. I've almost been hit multiple time with people passing on the shoulder to get onto the highway. There is clearly enough shoulder area available to put in a right turn lane.
Andy
37920
8-F-26-DP
Andy (37920), August 7, 2026 at 12:05 PM
I oppose this development because it will severely deteriorate Knob Creek due to the large amount of ground disturbance planned. The property has several steep slopes that are protected under the Hillside Protection Plan. This project cannot be completed without degrading the slopes and removing the vegetation, which helps with preventing erosion and flooding. Knob Creek will become even more full of silt during construction and afterwards. Please do not approve this project.
Crystal
37932
7-B-26-UR
Crystal (37932), August 7, 2026 at 12:47 PM
See attached comment
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807124727.pdf
Joshua
37932
7-B-26-UR
Joshua (37932), August 7, 2026 at 1:26 PM
See attached comment.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807132608.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 7:29 PM
Potential for vehicle damages due to fatigue dust.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807192926.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:00 PM
We believe that approving this expansion could violate the Americans with Disabilities Act and in turn the Fair Housing Act.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807200013.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:33 PM
CARE has acquired evidence of a bald eagle spending about a week in a tree inside of Hickory Meadows subdivision during critical mating and nesting season.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807203330.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:38 PM
Vulcan seems to have well documented history of air pollution violations as well as their subsidiaries. Here is one example.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807203809.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:39 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807203950.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:40 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807204028.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:41 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807204100.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:41 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807204143.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:42 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807204221.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:43 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807204327.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:44 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807204408.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:44 PM
Vulcan seems to have a well documented history of air pollution violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807204447.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 8:56 PM
Documented evidence of protected bats calling this habitat home.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807205603.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807211821.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:19 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807211910.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:19 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807211952.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:20 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807212046.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:21 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807212149.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:22 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807212231.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:23 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807212325.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:24 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807212442.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807212545.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 7, 2026 at 9:31 PM
Vulcan has a well documented history of environmental violations, along with their subsidiaries. Here is an example
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260807213140.pdf
Kimberly
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Kimberly (37938), August 8, 2026 at 10:37 AM
Good morning I am currently a resident in the overlook Estates subdivision that's off of McLeod Road that goes to the area you are talking about. I am against this because when you build up there on the hill, the runoff will be bad to McLeod Road, which is already bad enough as it is and it will cause McLeod Road to collapse it'll cost flooding and we do not need that in this area. We have enough homes out here as it is already. I also am against it for wildlife purposes we do have a lot of wildlife out here and we'd like to keep it the way it is dear lots of things that come out groundhogs everything we just like to keep it the way it is and I'm totally against this. Lastly, I would say it would bring more traffic in here and the traffic is bad enough and the schools are cramped and full as it is, we don't need more housing in the area..
David
37922
8-SA-26-C
David (37922), August 8, 2026 at 3:45 PM
Resident safety must be a consideration when making planning decisions. The planned entry/exit for this development will compound an already dangerous intersection. Over the last several years, the growth our area has experienced has far outpaced the safety measures and infrastructure.
Ebenezer Road has hundreds more daily vehicles which make thousands more trips. It's already dangerous to turn left out of Bexhill at certain times of day. Adding a hundred new residents and placing entry/exit points directly across from Gatwick would significantly endanger residents and people traveling, likely speeding, on Ebenezer.
We have a huge number of pedestrians, including elementary aged students who walk to Blue Grass. We recently had an e-bike accident at the front of the neighborhood! With more vehicles and trips more accidents are inevitable.
Please consider the families who already live here when making planning decisions. We do not oppose reasonable, responsible growth with consideration given to the safety of families who already live here. Thank you.
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), August 8, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Please see the legal arguments against the expansion of the Vulcan Dixie Lee Quarry.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260808180343.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), August 8, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Please read through this legal arguement in opposition of the Vulcan Dixie Lee Quarry expansion.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260808180510.pdf
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), August 8, 2026 at 6:06 PM
Thank you all for what you are contributing.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260808180615.pdf
Lindsay
37922
8-SA-26-C
Lindsay (37922), August 8, 2026 at 7:13 PM
Please reconsider the entry and exit point. This development is already going to make Ebenezer busier and therefore more dangerous. The entry exit shouldn't be next to another major entry exit like Gatwick.
Brittany
37917
4-A-26-OB
Brittany (37917), August 8, 2026 at 8:34 PM
This development should not go forward with it's current design, Knoxville deserves better than this boring concept that will detract rather enhance the city. Please find a developer that cares about neighborhoods and designing beautiful spaces.
Megan
37920
4-A-26-OB
Megan (37920), August 9, 2026 at 1:32 PM
There remains no traffic plan for a development of this size and scope. Henley/Chapman and the bridge are overloaded currently. The small neighborhood streets and Sevier Ave. cannot be expanded nor can they handle hundreds of additional vehicles each day. I think everyone can get behind the idea of dense housing when it is done well, but this isn't that. This is a quick hustle with no infrastructure in sight. If the commission wants this type of development, the infrastructure has to be done first. This could easily make South Knoxville unliveable for those of us who need to go north for work, shopping, dining, and activities.
John
37920
4-A-26-OB
John (37920), August 9, 2026 at 2:20 PM
We are in favor of the proposed 55+ center on the Kerbala Shriner Temple property. We are 7 year residents of the One Riverwalk apartments located very close to the property. The Shriners take their decision to sell to the developer very serious and are not just selling to the highest bidder. As someone retired and in our late 60s, the option of a 55+ community in this area is very needed. As far as pedestrian access from Blount/Sevier Avenues to/from Kerbala Ave and Kerns, currently the access is either trespassing up the stairs through the Shriner property or using the elevator/stairs in the public accessible Riverwalk Garage. The pedestrian/bicycle access from Sevier Ave to the Kerns location will become much clearer once the Rails to Trails path is complete through the existing railroad tunnel under Sherrod Street. This trail conversion will be completed before the Shriners project is undertaken. We believe the Shriners have been very patient with this planning process and should be allowed to sell the property that they have owned for over 80 years.
Jane
37917
4-A-26-OB
Jane (37917), August 9, 2026 at 4:25 PM
Please don't let them build another massive apartment building in south Knox. We need more parks and green space.
Annabel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Annabel (37920), August 9, 2026 at 4:42 PM
Once again, the developer has made very few concessions. The building is still an eyesore. There's very little commitment to community engagement. They're still not following the code that was established to make sure things like this did not happen. I'm not understanding why we would set code and then not enforce it. South Knoxville does not need a 55 and over residential community. And South Knoxville does not need any more traffic. The concerns that have been brought up have not been addressed. The developer has not shown a good faith effort to interact with the community. They have thumbed their noses at the south waterfront development plan. I think it is time to give the developer a firm NO.
Michael
37924
8-B-26-DP
Michael (37924), August 10, 2026 at 7:27 AM
Wooddale Church Road is a narrow, hilly, winding road. It was never meant to handle the amount of traffic that it does now, let alone more. I have lived here for 30 years now and in the first 25 years never had a close call or really any big need to complain about the traffic - other than speeders. Our driveway is just over a hill. Several times now I have almost been hit by other cars coming over the hill while I slowed or had to stop for traffic before entering my driveway. Many times I have had to almost hit the ditches when an approaching truck was on or over the center line - it needs to be widened. What it really needs though is No More Traffic. We moved out here for the rural-ness, the quiet, the "close to Knoxville but in the country" feel and vibe of the area. You are ruining another piece of what makes the county wonderful.
4-A-26-OB
Dan (37920), August 10, 2026 at 7:35 AM
The development will be an over-55 residence UNTIL IT ISN'T!
We've already seen this happen in North Knoxville with the old high school. The developer apparently wasn't making enough money under the over-55 restrictions, so the property was converted to allow residents of all ages. It then breezed through the necessary approvals and became a regular apartment development.
Around that same time, there was also an attempt to obtain a variance to turn the old South Knoxville School into an addiction treatment center. Fortunately, that proposal did not move forward, particularly given its location immediately next to an elementary school.
Now imagine that corner not being an over-55 residence.
The traffic implications could be enormous. Without the Gay Street Bridge, adding a full-scale apartment complex to that location could create a traffic juggernaut at the intersection of Henley Street and Blount Avenue. And if the over-55 designation is eventually removed, as has happened with other developments, the number of residents, vehicles, and daily trips could increase substantially.
The question isn't simply what the development is being proposed as today. We should also be asking what it could become five or ten years from now, and whether the surrounding infrastructure can handle it.
Matt
37924
8-B-26-DP
Matt (37924), August 10, 2026 at 7:36 AM
McCubbins rd is not wide enough! My parents live off McCubbins road and it's always a burden passing cars. Please do not build this subdivision.
8-B-26-DP
Roy (37924), August 10, 2026 at 7:50 AM
McCubbins Rd is to narrow for all of that traffic, and Wooddale church Rd is also to narrow for that traffic and Carter Mill Rd is to narrow for all that Traffic. We do not Want or Need all of those houses up here in this end of the County so go somewhere else. We like being in the County and don't need all of these city people in our area. So Please don't keep Building in this Area. We are country people and want to stay that way. Thank You
Donta
37920
4-A-26-OB
Donta (37920), August 10, 2026 at 8:00 AM
As a South Knoxville resident, I fully support the proposed development at 315 Kerbela Avenue. South Knoxville is growing, and I believe thoughtful multifamily development in the South Waterfront area is an important part of that growth.
This project can help bring more housing options to an area that is already evolving and becoming more walkable and connected to the rest of South Knoxville.
I encourage the Planning Commission to approve the proposed development and allow South Knoxville to continue moving forward in a thoughtful and positive direction.
Jennifer
37914
8-SB-26-F
Jennifer (37914), August 10, 2026 at 8:29 AM
Have any of you on Planning Commission OR Knox Co Planning actually visited this area? I highly doubt that you have, because if so you would see that this area can NOT handle the amount of traffic that you are planning to add! It can't handle the traffic it has now. The roads are too narrow. Not in good shape. There are no lines on the road (not that it matters, people don't stay in their own lane). There are no shoulders on the roads, so if you need to move over you are often going down into a ditch. This is going to add more vehicle traffic to an already too busy Strawberry Plains Pike (which is poorly designed, especially with the addition of Dollar General and no turn lane for vehicles to enter/exit) . Coming out of Wooddale Church Road is already a nightmare. We just do not have the infrastructure to support this. We have ONE grocery store. The biggest issue is that our wildlife are losing THEIR land. We have had bears in our back yard more this year than any other since we've lived here. Once we lose our wildlife, we are done. I don't know why you all have the desire to take the country out of East Knox county. We moved to the county to be in county. PLEASE reconsider this and any other developments in this area. We don't want it and our precious wildlife can't afford it. Get your tax money from somewhere else.
Elizabeth
37924
8-B-26-DP
Elizabeth (37924), August 10, 2026 at 8:46 AM
We have wayy to many developements going on in the stars every plains pike area we DONT NOT WANT ANYMORE! Traffic is already horrible not to mention off Wooddale Mc Cummins and the Carter Ridge/Carter pool area. The roads are not big enough to fit. The people you guys are trying to put in here. We don't want any more people we have plenty with the state cutting teachers pay school pay. We don't have enough teachers to accommodate the children that we have now but yet you're wanting to add so many more homes to teachers who already don't get paid enough and they continue to cut their pay and continue to cut the positions, but yet y'all are wanting to put more children on loads of teachers, who are barely surviving as is.. take this new development elsewhere we can't affford anymore places here!
Melissa
37924
8-B-26-DP
Melissa (37924), August 10, 2026 at 8:48 AM
We moved to the county because it wasn't a crowded and we could farm. If we wanted to live ontop of each other, we would move downtown with Kincannon but we don't align with her values let a lone the garbage that comes with it. You all know the infrastructure will not hold the amount of homes you want to put out in Carter community. All of our roads are so small you can't even paint a true 2 lane road and all the neighboring streets will be affected as well. The school's can't even handle the amount of kids they have now, and they are already graduating without knowing basic math and can barely read. East Knox isn't the city. Stop trying to turn it into part of the the scruffy city. Us country folk have had all of it we want. Stop letting DR Horton and smith built, buliding horrible homes, stop cramming houses ontop of each other. Leave the east side alone before you destroy it like you have the city. We don't want water problems, we don't want flooding because you will absolutely approve homes in flooding zones and it will ripple over onto neighboring neighborhoods. The new transplants are already flying down our 20mph road and it is only going to get worse. I don't even let my kids wait for the school bus because the road is so dangerous now and adding close to 200 homes will be detrimental to our community.
Michael
37924
8-B-26-DP
Michael (37924), August 10, 2026 at 8:54 AM
Send a PDF
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810085402.pdf
Linda
37924
8-B-26-DP
Linda (37924), August 10, 2026 at 10:00 AM
The infrastructure (roads) in this area are not sufficient to handle the additional traffic this would create. Not just Carter Mill Road, but also the other roads to reach Carter Mill Road. Please vote no to this development.
Thanks
Tanya
37924
8-B-26-DP
Tanya (37924), August 10, 2026 at 10:33 AM
Carter Mill Road, McCubbins Road, and Wooddale Church Road cannot handle the additional traffic from 120 more properties being placed on Carter Mill Road. This would add over 240+ more vehicles to roads that are already overcrowded even if you say at least 2 vehicles per house but most likely more. With the new condo neighborhood already being added at the end of Wooddale Church Road there is going to be so much congestion trying to even get out on Strawberry Plains Pike. We do not have the infrastructure for the continued growth in our area. Everyday the interstate is now backed up at Strawberry Plains Pike and Asheville Highway. We don't want to be part of the city! Enough is enough!
Jennifer
37871
8-B-26-DP
Jennifer (37871), August 10, 2026 at 10:36 AM
This development is extremely detrimental to our livelihood. Please do not approve anymore development in this area! Many of us have well water that is being affected. The roads, schools, the one main grocery store, amongst other community amenities cannot support the influx of structures and/or people in this area. Furthermore, the wildlife in this area have little space left and many are important to our ecosystem. Lastly, this area is already suffering from heavy pollution from the adjacent I-40. I encourage you to deny the developers request and not give in to greed! Thanks for your time and attention.
Belinda
37871
8-B-26-DP
Belinda (37871), August 10, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Please deny this! Our roads are to narrow for extra traffic. The traffic we have now is ridiculous, you can barely get out of your own driveway without being hit by a car that is coming over to pass a car. We don't need anymore people in our area.
Joshua
37919
4-A-26-OB
Joshua (37919), August 10, 2026 at 11:33 AM
I want to express my support for the proposed 55+ community at the Shriners site. I believe this project is a great opportunity to improve an important property and create something that will be a long-term benefit to the surrounding community.
There is a growing demand for quality housing options designed for people 55 and older. This development would help meet that demand while giving residents the opportunity to live in a great location and remain active and connected to the Knoxville community.
I also believe this development will have a positive impact well beyond the property itself. Bringing more residents to the area will mean more customers for local restaurants, shops, and businesses. It will also add more people who can enjoy and support everything happening along the South Waterfront.
The Shriners site is a unique property, and this is an opportunity to put it to a use that complements the surrounding area and contributes to its continued growth. I encourage the Planning Commission to support and approve the proposed development. I believe a well-designed 55+ community will strengthen the South Waterfront, support local businesses, provide a needed housing option, and be a positive addition to Knoxville for years to come.
Jessica
37917
4-A-26-OB
Jessica (37917), August 10, 2026 at 11:37 AM
I am not in support of this project. The last thing we need is more apartments in South Knox, especially ones that will drastically change the skyline on the river. We should be protecting our historical buildings, not destroying them.
John
37920
4-A-26-OB
John (37920), August 10, 2026 at 12:12 PM
DO NOT BUILD THIS! There is far too much congestion in this area already, and this will only make it worse since obviously nothing will be done to improve ingress and egress! We all know you only care about making money and have zero regard for citizens who actually live and work here!
Benjamin
37902
8-A-26-PA
Benjamin (37902), August 10, 2026 at 12:34 PM
Attached please find the following position statement from Mr. Mullins regarding Agenda No. 13, 8-A-26 PA and 8-4-26 RZ. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our firm.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810123420.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 12:56 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for communities around a quarry with the furthest documented fly rock travelling 11,532 feet.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810125603.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 12:57 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810125712.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 12:58 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810125808.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 12:58 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810125855.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810125950.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:00 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130029.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:01 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130121.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:02 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130200.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:02 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130256.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:03 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130348.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:05 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130521.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:06 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130612.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:07 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130702.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:08 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130803.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:08 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810130858.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:10 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131003.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:11 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131101.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:12 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131200.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:13 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131309.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:14 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131406.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:14 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131458.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:16 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131605.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:17 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131712.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:18 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810131808.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:21 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810132137.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:26 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810132604.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:26 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810132639.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:27 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810132720.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:27 PM
Fly rock is a huge concern for homes around a quarry. The furthest documented fly rock was 11,532 feet
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810132756.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:29 PM
Fly rock deaths
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810132958.pdf
Scott
37920
8-SG-26-C
Scott (37920), August 10, 2026 at 1:30 PM
We respectfully request that the Planning Commission deny the alternative design standard to increase the grade from 12% to 12.92%. If the 12% grade cannot be met, then the overall plan should be modified to accommodate the required 12% maximum grade. Note that this request should have been foreseen when the Planning Commission chose to ignore "Hillside Protection" in making their previous decision to approve this development.
Furthermore, I want to take this opportunity to oppose the overall development for many reasons which are outlined in my previous comments (see attached) and that we attempted to address at the Planning Commission meeting on September 11, 2025 (see meeting video @ 30 min. September 11, 2025 - Planning Commission | Videos & Movies on Vimeo). However, it is very difficult and downright disrespectful to only allot a combined of 5 minutes to an entire community that will be affected long term by this and other developments.
Please see my attached comments.
Respectfully,
Scott A. Ballard, P.E.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133027.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:30 PM
Fly Rock deaths
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133040.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:32 PM
Violation list
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133244.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:34 PM
Vulcan subsidiaries
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133402.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:35 PM
Tennessee violations
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133529.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:36 PM
Tennessee Violations
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133609.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:37 PM
Tennessee Violations
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133707.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:39 PM
Water pollution violations
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810133925.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:40 PM
Water Violations
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810134007.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:40 PM
Water Violations
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810134047.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 10, 2026 at 1:41 PM
Water Violations
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810134128.pdf
Dian
37871
8-B-26-DP
Dian (37871), August 10, 2026 at 1:52 PM
Please follow staff recommendation and deny this concept plan and development plan due to inadequate road width. As the transportation analysis says, Carter Mill Drive is too narrow to accept this amount of houses. But what the transportation analysis fails to mention is that the roads that Carter Mill Drive leads to - Wooddale Church Road and McCubbins Road - are also far too narrow. Even if Carter Mill Road is widened, these roads would need to be widened too.
Scott
37920
8-F-26-DP
Scott (37920), August 10, 2026 at 1:54 PM
I apologize if these comments are redundant or show up on 8-G-26-DP/ 8-SF-26-C. Both show up as "Pruitt Farms" on the agenda.
We respectfully request that the Planning Commission deny the alternative design standard to increase the grade from 12% to 12.92%. If the 12% grade cannot be met, then the overall plan should be modified to accommodate the required 12% maximum grade. Note that this request should have been foreseen when the Planning Commission chose to ignore "Hillside Protection" in making their previous decision to approve this development.
Furthermore, I want to take this opportunity to oppose the overall development for many reasons which are outlined in my previous comments (see attached) and that we attempted to address at the Planning Commission meeting on September 11, 2025 (see meeting video @ 30 min. September 11, 2025 - Planning Commission | Videos & Movies on Vimeo). However, it is very difficult and downright disrespectful to only allot a combined of 5 minutes to an entire community that will be affected long term by this and other developments.
Please contact me to further discuss these comments and concerns.
Thanks,
Scott A. Ballard, P.E.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810135456.pdf
Chris
37938
8-D-26-PA
Chris (37938), August 10, 2026 at 2:04 PM
See attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810140439.pdf
Chris
37938
8-I-26-RZ
Chris (37938), August 10, 2026 at 2:09 PM
See attached. 
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810140931.pdf
Anita
37922
8-SA-26-C
Anita (37922), August 10, 2026 at 2:19 PM
Once again, the Planning Commission is asked to consider a variance for a very busy section of Ebenezer Road that is already crowded with businesses and housing developments, which the current road design was not made to handle. This area has experienced more accidents because of rezoning the Bexhill field to include a strip mall and additional housing less than a quarter mile from the planned townhouses. Also, this area is home to Bluegrass Elementary School, which was once walkable for our children. Now, it is unsafe due to increased traffic. I ask the commission to please deny this variance - continued development is destroying what was once an area where moderate-income families could live safely.
4-A-26-OB
Amy (37923), August 10, 2026 at 2:21 PM
I am in support of the development of the Shriner Site! South Knoxville and Downtown need a 55+ active adult community.
It also needs more year round residents to support retailers
Andrew
37919
4-A-26-OB
Andrew (37919), August 10, 2026 at 2:30 PM
I support this development and would love to see it be approved to move forward. I am a lifelong Knoxvillian and believe this land has so much potential to be a positive influence on the community.
Savannah
37920
4-A-26-OB
Savannah (37920), August 10, 2026 at 2:46 PM
SWAG does not represent all of South Knoxville. SWAG is not an elected group of people. SWAG has been granted a lot of what they wanted out of this project. Did they get everything they requested? No, but they have gotten a lot of 'wins' out of this project. Their aggression towards this site needs to end. As a South Knoxville resident, I welcome this project. Please approve this! 
Aaron
37917
4-A-26-OB
Aaron (37917), August 10, 2026 at 3:09 PM
YES! Knoxville has reviewed the updated proposal prepared for the 08.13.2026 Planning Commission Meeting and still believes that this development should be required to provide guaranteed and legally-enforceable public access through the site for pedestrians. We are not aware of how a tunnel will be a functional, safe, and legally guaranteed means of public access. We advocate for an "eyes on the street" approach to public ways for engagement and safety. We also encourage the developer to consider taking full advantage of the density allowed in the SW districts, in which they are working, because, in addition to being (presumably) more financially viable for the project, the increased tax base, decreased carbon emissions per housing unit, shorter commutes, and increased walkability will benefit the current and future residents of Knoxville. We encourage the developer to investigate how to engage with the Dawson Street frontage by directly placing housing units and/or leasable commercial space along the street. It is unclear how a parking garage is feasible along that frontage but housing units or leasable commercial space is not.
Todd
37924
8-B-26-DP
Todd (37924), August 10, 2026 at 4:51 PM
Please deny 8-B-26-DP in Carter Mill . Carter Mill road cannot handle any more traffic due to it being too narrow for traffic. It is extremely dangerous for two vehicles to pass yet alone construction vehicles. Also, McCubbins road pose the same traffic safety issue. Woodall Church road is nearly impossible to get out at Strawberry Plains Pike during evening hours and i'm afraid there will be bad accidents there in the near future . My family and friends travels this route often and it's getting very dangerous due to the influx of homes you have already passed for development. Any logical traffic study or camera will back up my claim. I am tired of constantly seeing more land up to build with 5 homes per acre without ANY plans to fix the infrastructure around it. We here in Carter demand that proper infrastructure and traffic management be implemented before giving any developer a Green light. We will not have this area ruined by irresponsible building and irresponsible commissioners .period. ! This also means changing rural conservation land to residential. Enough is enough ! If you really want to see a community turnout plan the meetings for the working families to attend i'll guarantee you will be turning people away due to fire code reasons. Do the right thing and say no.
Carolyn
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Carolyn (37938), August 10, 2026 at 5:37 PM
Please see attached comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810173744.pdf
Deborah
37920
4-A-26-OB
Deborah (37920), August 10, 2026 at 8:13 PM
I feel it is very important that any development of the Kerbela property adhere to the South Waterfront Code. As someone who redeveloped a historical building on Sevier Avenue and adhered to the South Waterfront Code I believe any redevelopment also adhere to the code. Due to active population located in South Knoxville I believe a gated design does not fit and a connection from north to south should be planned.
Rachael
37938
8-H-26-RZ
Rachael (37938), August 10, 2026 at 9:20 PM
Please see attached comments.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260810212000.pdf
Janet
37838
8-C-26-PA
Janet (37838), August 11, 2026 at 12:03 AM
See attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811000352.pdf
Cohl
37920
4-A-26-OB
Cohl (37920), August 11, 2026 at 7:28 AM
The developer has met with the community multiple times, has met with SWAG multiple times, and has had multiple meetings with local gov officials. The developer has changed their plan multiple times to better fit the South waterfront code. This site has extreme challenges that will make any developer have to deviate from the code, so no plan will ever be perfect or able to follow the code. I, along with many other South Knoxville residents and business and property owners, want to see this project happen. The building materials will be some of the nicest ever used along the waterfront ( mostly stone ), public viewing areas have been added, a walkway through the site has been added, the JFG sign is coming back, and most importantly, millions of dollars of tax revenue will be generated for the city from this project. The community has gotten a lot of wins out of this project. Please approve this!
4-A-26-OB
Zoe (37919), August 11, 2026 at 9:14 AM
Please see attached comments on behalf of Bike Walk Knoxville.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811091446.pdf
Sheev
37912
4-A-26-OB
Sheev (37912), August 11, 2026 at 9:22 AM
Chair and Commissioners,
I support the proposed redevelopment of the Kerbela Shriners Temple site at 315 Kerbela Avenue.
CR Endeavors has listened to the community and revised the plan. The project brings needed 55+ housing near downtown, preserves the site's history, and opens public connection to the Gay Street landing on a bluff that's sat underused for decades.
Please move it forward.
Hailey
37920
4-A-26-OB
Hailey (37920), August 11, 2026 at 9:51 AM
I wanted to add my voice to the concerns that SWAAG has discussed with this project about having a public connection from Mimosa to Old Sevier, and to do something for the public good at Dawson. I walk and ride my bike a lot and often have to jet over to walk along Chapman since there are few ways through to Gay St bridge or Old Sevier. It would be great to have a way through right at the bridge, and it would honor the intention of the stair that exists there now. Much of the development on the waterfront has not included the neighborhood in the planning (case in point the development at Regal right there) and it really takes away from the vitality of the waterfront area. Let's think long term!
Maggie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Maggie (37920), August 11, 2026 at 9:52 AM
A skyline defines a city and East TN, with beautiful hills and valleys, needs special planning to ensure the skyline is attractive. This particular hill overlooking and directly visible from downtown (Gay St.) should be pleasant to look at instead of just giant apartment buildings. Planning needs to insist on SW-5 and SW-6 zoning rules be complied with and WITHOUT VARIANCES. Managing slopes with landscaping and welcoming parks and pathways would provide a public good and should be prioritized. Housing within that type of site plan can be accommodated. South Knoxville residents should be supported to move within the space and not blocked by another GIANT apartment building on top of one of the few remaining hills with historic significance. Please do not allow this private developer to have variances to the form-based code that was so carefully planned by the public.
Michael
37849
4-A-26-OB
Michael (37849), August 11, 2026 at 9:55 AM
I'm a barber at a shop in South Knoxville.This project would absolutely benefit all the businesses on Sevier avenue and the surrounding area. I have heard a few comments about how we don't need any more development in South knoxville, but this exactly what we need. This isn't more student housing. This is a senior living development that brings more business to our local shops and restaurants.
Also, as a lifetime Knoxville resident, it's good to see upward movement in the area proposed. The Shriners Temple has just decayed over the years and I'd love to see the space improved.
WILLIAM
37917
4-A-26-OB
WILLIAM (37917), August 11, 2026 at 10:19 AM
We don't need these apartments on the river.
Jessica
37917
4-A-26-OB
Jessica (37917), August 11, 2026 at 10:22 AM
This developer does not care about how this will affect the people of Knoxville. We all know this, they don't even live here. Why is coding completely being ignored? And how long before the "55 and up" changes to all ages? We have already seen the absolute mess that overdevelopment has caused our city. This is disgusting and I can't believe we are having to fight this so hard. It's exhausting.
Scott
37920
8-F-26-DP
Scott (37920), August 11, 2026 at 10:28 AM
Another note for Engineering. The boundary survey of the properties is incomplete. All corners have not been located/marked.
4-A-26-OB
Ann (37920), August 11, 2026 at 11:17 AM
This is a major geographical area of the city of Knoxville. It is also part of the South Waterfront Vision Plan that was carefully crafted with neighbor and professional input. The proposed development is an affront to that vision. We don't want a huge gated building on top of the only undeveloped hill visible from downtown. The developers have not made credible efforts to comply with the Code or meet with the advisory group's notable efforts to cooperate. I would much rather an art installation or artistic building or something promoting environmental beauty above the Tennessee river. This is an opportunity to make something beautiful but if planners only listen to economic development proposals that don't even come close to what citizens want in their city, it will become just another notable mistake on a hill.
Roger
37902
4-A-26-OB
Roger (37902), August 11, 2026 at 11:26 AM
I am in favor for this development for the following reasons: The development would create significant new tax revenue. The site currently generates little to no tax revenue for the City of Knoxville, while the proposed development is expected to generate millions in new tax revenue.
The developer has responded to community concerns. The plan has been substantially revised at SWAG's request, demonstrating a willingness to address concerns and make reasonable adjustments.
The decision should be based on administrative standards, not emotion. If the proposal meets applicable zoning and development requirements, approval should be based on those objective standards rather than subjective opposition.
Kevin E.
37932
7-B-26-UR
Kevin E. (37932), August 11, 2026 at 1:33 PM
CARE is submitting legal arguements against the Vulcan Dixie Lee Quarry expansion.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811133309.pdf
Allen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Allen (37920), August 11, 2026 at 2:08 PM
As a South Knoxville resident, I strongly support the proposed redevelopment of the property at 315 Kerbela Avenue into a 55+ active adult residential community. South Knoxville has experienced tremendous growth in recent years, but there remains a need for quality housing options that allow older adults to remain in the community they know and love. This development provides an opportunity for residents to downsize without leaving South Knoxville and Downtown. The area has increasingly become more student based, which means a lot of seasonal customers for local businesses. Redeveloping this underutilized property into this well-designed senior housing community is an appropriate use of the site and will provide long-term benefits to the neighborhood that are not seasonal. Future residents will have convenient access to shopping, restaurants, parks, and other amenities while contributing to the local economy. It is my understanding that the site produces no tax revenue as is, but once this development is approved, it would generate millions of dollars in tax revenue for the city. I believe this project represents a thoughtful investment in South Knoxville's future and respectfully encourage its approval.
Marisa
37920
4-A-26-OB
Marisa (37920), August 11, 2026 at 3:31 PM
I support the proposed development and believe it will be a positive addition to South Knoxville. This area needs more 55+ active adult housing options, and this development would help bring more year-round residents to the area who will support our local businesses, restaurants, and retailers. I appreciate that the developer has listened to the community and made significant changes to their original plan. I believe the revised proposal is a thoughtful investment in South Knoxville and will benefit the surrounding community.
Kellie
37921
8-E-26-SU
Kellie (37921), August 11, 2026 at 4:18 PM
Hello! My property backs up closely to where this is planned! I am unable to come to the meeting due to prior commitments. However, I did still want to raise some concerns. I am concerned about how this will impact local flooding. This seems to be right where a natural valley is in the land that collects a lot of rain water to protect houses in the area. Additionally, I hate to see the landscape go away. One of the things that makes our neighborhood special and beautiful and still being in the great city of Knoxville is the mature trees. Just last week I saw a fox running in this area. Additionally, we have many bunnies, squirrels, birds, and I have even been able to see deer in the exact area this is planned to be built. Our street, and the land directly next to this project, has seen many water leaks, too. The water leak on Rohar Rd seemed to happen just after they cleared the land for this project. How can we be sure the land and existing infrastructure will be protected and millions of gallons of water not be wasted? I hope this doesn't go through but if it does, I certainly hope that the integrity of the land in this special area is put first. Thank you, and have a wonderful day.
Renea
37709
4-A-26-OB
Renea (37709), August 11, 2026 at 5:07 PM
As a South Knoxville resident I fully approve of this proposal and am thankful for the developers efforts to open this to our community.
Scott
37871
8-SB-26-C
Scott (37871), August 11, 2026 at 5:45 PM
As a resident of this community, I ask you to take your staff's recommendation and deny these plans. As the traffic analysis states, Carter Mill Road is too narrow. Further, Wooddale Church Road is too narrow and all the traffic on Carter Mill Road will end up on it.
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Here is evidence of protected turtles that call this habitat home. A baby soft shell turtle being moved off of Graybeal Road
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811175344.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 5:57 PM
A protected turtle that calls this habitat home. A baby soft shell turtle being removed from Graybeal Road.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811175734.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 5:58 PM
Protected bat species that call this habitat home
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811175841.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 5:59 PM
Protected bat that calls this habitat home
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811175929.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:01 PM
June 17th, 2026 blast report
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811180113.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:02 PM
June 17, 2026 Blast memo shows potential violation
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811180222.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:04 PM
June 17th, 2026 blast can be seen on Google maps. You can clearly see the dust originating in Vulcan's quarry and travelling out. Fatigue dust is trespassing.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811180428.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Dust cloud starting on June 17th, 2026 after Vulcan blast
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811180533.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:06 PM
A protected Bald Eagle located in a tree inside of Hickory Meadows subdivision during mating and nesting season
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811180659.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:08 PM
A protected bald eagle in a tree inside of Hickory Meadows subdivision during mating and nesting season
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811180811.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:09 PM
A protected bald eagle in a tree inside of Hickory Meadows subdivision during mating and nesting season
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811180925.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:11 PM
Vulcan's quarry in Greenville, TN had a berm failure on July 12, 2026 showing why residents here are concerned with this expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181122.pdf
Ellen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Ellen (37920), August 11, 2026 at 6:12 PM
Another development in an already saturated area? Pump the brakes!
Since the Gay Street Bridge was closed, the intersection at Henley Bridge and Blount Avenue has become a mess. The apartments on Blount Avenue were at least approved before the Gay Street Bridge was closed, but those apartments still have not been fully occupied.
Can we please see what happens to traffic once the new housing on Blount Ave is filled before approving even more building in this corridor?
With all of this development, I worry about the impact on the students and staff at South Knox Elementary. The school is an important anchor in a rapidly changing community, and we need to make sure it remains a safe, functional place for the children who attend it and the people who work there.
And regarding the over 55 aspect of this development, I have reason to be skeptical. My mother was living at South High when they were trying to get that property rezoned. Many of the staff members quit, and we became so concerned about her safety that we felt we had no choice but to move her.
I would bet money that this development will only remain over 55 for a short time. We have seen how these promises can change when the economics change. Once the development is built, what happens if the developer decides they can make more money by opening it to residents of all ages?
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:13 PM
Vulcan's quarry in Greenville TN experienced a berm failure on July 12th, 2026. This is why residents have concerns over this expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181308.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:14 PM
Vulcan's quarry in Greenville TN experienced a berm failure on July 12th, 2026. This is why residents have concerns over this expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181405.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:15 PM
Vulcan's quarry in Greenville TN experienced a berm failure on July 12th, 2026. This is why residents have concerns over this expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181513.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:16 PM
Vulcan's quarry in Greenville TN experienced a berm failure on July 12th, 2026. This is why residents have concerns over this expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181627.pdf
Thomas
37932
7-B-26-UR
Thomas (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:16 PM
Please see attached PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181656.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:17 PM
Vulcan's quarry in Greenville TN experienced a berm failure on July 12th, 2026. This is why residents have concerns over this expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181731.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:18 PM
Vulcan's quarry in Greenville TN experienced a berm failure on July 12th, 2026. This is why residents have concerns over this expansion
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181817.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:19 PM
My front door after only 18 months of my home being constructed
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811181953.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:20 PM
My front door after only 18 months of my home being constructed
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811182038.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:21 PM
My front door after only 18 months of my home being constructed
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811182129.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:22 PM
A second protected soft shell turtle
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811182226.pdf
Gary
37932
7-B-26-UR
Gary (37932), August 11, 2026 at 6:23 PM
A third protected soft shell turtle
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811182320.pdf
Stephanie
37921
8-E-26-SU
Stephanie (37921), August 11, 2026 at 6:41 PM
Before the city considers adding new duplexes in this area, there needs to be some serious attention given to the literal downstream impact of stormwater and the existing drainage/infrastructure issues already occurring.
My house is on Sullivan Rd and backs up to the first house on Rohar. Anytime we get heavy rain, our backyard essentially turns into a creek and our front yard turns into a river.
Please understand, this is not a hypothetical concern. It's already happening with the development that currently exists.
I have a hard time understanding how adding additional homes, pavement, rooftops, and runoff is going to improve an area that already cannot adequately handle heavy rainfall.
It seems incredibly irresponsible to consider adding new development before addressing the infrastructure needed to support it. Before approving anything new, the city should take a serious look at the drainage issues in this area and the impact on the residents already living here.
Kristen
37921
8-E-26-SU
Kristen (37921), August 11, 2026 at 7:05 PM
I live in Cumberland Estates and do not approve of this build. It needs to be left as it is for watershed purposes along with the animals that call the plot home. Aside from that, a new multi family home does not belong in a quaint 1950s era neighborhood.
Kathy
37924
8-B-26-DP
Kathy (37924), August 11, 2026 at 8:36 PM
Please deny this rezoning because the infrastructure is stressed to the limits in this area. The traffic is terrible and there are over 1200 new rooftops here already. We do not need any more houses.
Laura
37921
8-E-26-SU
Laura (37921), August 11, 2026 at 10:57 PM
My family's concern is that the duplex style of housing would degrade the neighborhood cohesive aesthetics of single family homes. If the lots are owned and sold individually to a family wanting to build that's one thing and I would approve. I personally do not agree with the proposal and I am against it. Our neighborhood is sought after for its single family homes with good size lots. I would hate for this to start changing.
Maria
37917
8-A-26-SU
Maria (37917), August 11, 2026 at 11:11 PM
attached letter!
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811231110.pdf
Austin
37921
8-E-26-SU
Austin (37921), August 11, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Please see attachment. I urge the Commission to deny this request or postpone until proper surveys/impact analyses are completed.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260811232807.pdf
Ritschl
3792
8-SG-26-C
Ritschl ( 3792), August 11, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Absolutely not, we can not handle any increased traffic on our archaic asphalt directly on the ground narrow roads. I complete reconstruction would be necessary complete with a base and curbs. We can not safely accept the increased traffic flow on Rudder.
Summer
37849
8-J-26-RZ
Summer (37849), August 11, 2026 at 11:58 PM
Some concerns need to be addressed before approving. As a neighbor, living next to the location, I'd like to bring up considerations. First, the land is a water shed , retention pond, when there is rain. The pasture becomes flooded after downpour. Where would water go? Flood new properties? If land is built up to level it out, would water not be forced to run into adjacent properties? If built in the sunken field, water will still settle. If members visit after rain, presence of high water will be visible. Who wants to have a neighborhood in a flood zone? My second topic is about HEISKELL ROAD. As residents, it's necessary to accelerate quickly out of our driveways or risk getting hit by oncoming traffic. We are in the path of a dangerous part of this road, with sign stating that Hill blocks view, near the entrance of the parcel. Visibility is limited. There have been car accidents in this location due to lack of visibility. Imagine many new residents in this development, turning, within an already dangerous stretch of road, potentially causing more risk & accidents. Traffic is challenging when cars turn into the neighboring Country Walk or one of our homes. If school bus, trash truck, or mail truck are stopped, traffic gets congested. Water retention , traffic and road visibility concerns, and cramming a multi dwelling community in a rural setting where a hill blocks views should be researched before approving.
Rachel
37920
4-A-26-OB
Rachel (37920), August 12, 2026 at 3:56 AM
Attached are comments from the South Knoxville Advisory and Advocacy Group. We also refer you to our comments from July.,
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260812035611.pdf
Stewart
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stewart (37920), August 12, 2026 at 6:50 AM
I am not in favor of this development as proposed. They have not adequately responded to the concerns regarding SWFBC. The developers were fully aware of the code and have not adhered to it with from the beginning and after multiple chances they have not embraced the codified desires of the community. I am aware that South Knoxville is not represented on the PC but it is my hope that our concerns will be honored and this project will be denied as proposed.
Christina
37924
8-SB-26-F
Christina (37924), August 12, 2026 at 7:21 AM
I am begging you to reconsider this development. This will be tearing down a farm, and the road is basically one lane and can't support any more residents. Please do the right thing for my community that I live in and have been my entire life... please don't grow it until we don't recognize it or until we can't get around. Please!
Louise
37920
4-A-26-OB
Louise (37920), August 12, 2026 at 7:46 AM
This proposal still does not meet the letter or spirit of the existing plan for our south waterfront.
-The gated enclave design is very disappointing.
-The north/south passageway is unacceptable. This tunnel that is labeled a breezeway is neither open nor inviting.
- The public engagement area at the Dawson corner doesn't seem to have any plan, funding or schedule for construction. I am afraid it will just remain an empty promise for years to come.
Housing on this spot is a great idea. Continuing to revitalize the south waterfront is a great idea. Bringing new business to our city is a great idea. But please, can we do it in a manner that follows the guidelines, serves the existing community, and makes our city a shining example of well considered progress?
Marisa
37804
4-A-26-OB
Marisa (37804), August 12, 2026 at 7:57 AM
As it sits, the site is private property and there is no walk way through this site. The Shriners own it, it's private property, and is closed off from the community. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL CHANGE THAT!
The developer is proposing more sidewalks, activated street corners, the return of the JFG sign, and a walk way through the site. SWAG members obsession with this property is concerning, and their efforts could cost Knoxville millions in tax dollars. PLEASE APPROVE!
4-A-26-OB
Jay (37804), August 12, 2026 at 8:55 AM
I own property on Sevier Avenue near this site and I fully support this development. Please see my statement attached.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260812085534.pdf
Cofield
37919
4-A-26-OB
Cofield (37919), August 12, 2026 at 9:02 AM
More residents living within walking distance means more everyday foot traffic for the restaurants and shops already there. The success of Kern's Food Hall and Sevier Avenue businesses depends on regulars who can pop in easily, and new neighbors nearby are exactly that kind of customer. This kind of steady, local demand also helps small businesses stay open through slower weekdays, not just weekends.
Stephen
37920
4-A-26-OB
Stephen (37920), August 12, 2026 at 9:15 AM
Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
City Church of Knoxville supports the redevelopment of the former Kerbela Shriners property and welcomes the addition of new housing and neighbors to South Knoxville. However, as an immediate neighbor, we remain concerned that several important issues have not been adequately addressed.
First, we continue to request a Traffic Impact Study. The development will introduce a substantial number of new residents and vehicle trips near Dawson Street, Kerbela Avenue, surrounding neighborhood streets, and our church property. Given the number of families and children regularly using our campus, we believe traffic and pedestrian safety should be fully evaluated before approval. The City should be instrumental in setting the scope of this traffic study and its cost borne by the developer.
We also remain concerned about the treatment of the Dawson Street frontage, particularly the placement of a parking structure along the street. We encourage further consideration of residential, commercial, or other active uses that better engage the neighborhood.
City Church is not opposed to this development. We simply ask that the Planning Commission ensure that the project addresses these still unresolved concerns before granting the requested alternative compliance.
Respectfully,
Stephen Ellett
City Church of Knoxville
KEVIN
37774
4-A-26-OB
KEVIN (37774), August 12, 2026 at 9:49 AM
I am a long time resident and former Chairman of Planning and Zoning in CT.
I support this redevelopment.
Thank you,
Kellie
37920
4-A-26-OB
Kellie (37920), August 12, 2026 at 10:11 AM
I am very disappointed in the so-called resolutions the developer has offered. They have really made it clear A) that they are not interested in working with the community on this and B) that they think they are above the form code and the intent for South Knoxville as laid out in the vision plan.
The developer claimed they could not dig into the bedrock because it would be a hardship, but now their solution to prevent pedestrians from mingling with people in their condo system is to ... building a tunnel into the bedrock? So much for a hardship. Their "solution" also completely disregards the intent of allowing pedestrians access through the site. And having a timed gate entry? No. There are plenty of buildings downtown and in South Knox with retail on the bottom and apartments above. The streetscape needs to be activated. As is, this design does not fit the area and does not allow pedestrian access.
The Kerbela site will set a precedent for all new development like this, and the city can not allow such a flagrant violation of the form code and vision plan to be approved.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20260812101102.pdf