October 2, 2025
Planning Commission meeting
Planning Commission meeting
Public Comments
56 Comments for
Betty Jo
37912
37912
7-P-24-RZ
Betty Jo (37912), July 8, 2024 at 12:26 PM
We agree wholeheartedly with Planning staff on denial of increasing the zoning on this property from single family to multi-family use. The Inskip area has been inundated with multi-family housing over the years. This would also increase the traffic on roads that have not been improved or updated in years. Please uphold staff's recommendation to not change the zoning or the plan amendments for this property. Betty Jo (37912), July 8, 2024 at 12:26 PM
Elizabeth
37912
37912
7-G-24-PA
Elizabeth (37912), September 24, 2024 at 12:48 AM
I live just next door to the property in question, and I'm restoring a 2 BR, 1 bath cottage built in 1940 that sits on the same sized lot. The re-zoning proposal for the property means that a 2-story duplex with 2 BRs each - that's maybe 8 people, easily, isn't enough. I'm concerned, and rezoning a lot the size of mine opens a can of worms for everybody all over the city. Please gently recommend alternatives, Elizabeth (37912), September 24, 2024 at 12:48 AM
Canaan
37912
37912
6-E-25-RZ
Canaan (37912), May 14, 2025 at 9:30 PM
I am a long time resident of Keck Road. This road has been continuously developed over the last several years with multiple single family homes. While these are nice, they contribute largely to the increase in traffic on our narrow street. There are children that live on this street, including my own, that more traffic will only hinder their outside play. The road also needs repair from the city due to the increase in traffic and ongoing water issues that cause the asphalt to break. Please see multiple reports to Knoxville's 311. Secondly, the property in question inhabits multiple wildlife species that thrive in the underdeveloped land. Over the years, the various wildlife have been driven out of their habitats by the development that continues to occur on Keck. They are driven towards Callahan Drive which is very dangerous for everyone including the animals. I ask that you heavily consider not re-zoning this for multiple dwellings rather keep it zoned AG for someone who will build 1-2 homes with space and care for our street and the multiple species that were here first. Canaan (37912), May 14, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Michele
37849
37849
6-E-25-RZ
Michele (37849), June 7, 2025 at 6:50 PM
The proposal to build multi-family complexes on Keck Road is not a good idea. Keck Road is narrow with ditches on each side with a drainage problem. There are many SINGLE FAMILY homes on this street as well as a natural habitat for animals and birds. Keck Road is a quiet street where families and their children spend time outside. Additional heavy traffic from even more multi-family dwellings would destroy this freedom. Please vote no to any more development on Keck Road and keep it AG.Michele (37849), June 7, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Thank you.
Betty
37912
37912
6-E-25-RZ
Betty (37912), June 9, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Keck Road is a cut through road with a lot of traffic. I never back out of my driveway. At a lot of places on the road, 1 car needs to pull over on the dirt to pass. The road is narrow. There is no sewer on this section of the road. I am on septic. I am against that many houses on this section of property. Betty (37912), June 9, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Ann
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Ann (37920), June 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM
I live in Lake Forest and turning left off Chapman Highway is dangerous but not as dangerous as Red Bud Road. Locust Hill is just before Red Bud and we do NOT need additional driveways or increased traffic on Locust Hill. Traffic studies should be done to see the impact of a new subdivision on Chapman Highway. Also, I am told there is a major cave system under this potential development. I am concerned that this steep and forested piece of land will be demolished to create new homes and thus stop one of the corridors of the Urban Wilderness. I am very concerned that developers use huge equipment to cut down all the trees on this type of property which could be developed for one or two houses and not a subdivision. Please consider the Hillside Protection area and the beauty of the surrounding neighborhoods. South Knoxville has more trees than other areas of town and we are proud of that. Please do not allow destruction of our forests.Ann (37920), June 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Concerned
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Concerned (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:24 PM
I am writing as a resident of Locust Hill Lane to formally object to the proposed development detailed in Case 7-SB-25-C. While I recognize the need for housing in our community, this specific site raises major red flags from a public safety and environmental standpoint that I believe must not be overlooked. Please see the attached rationale. Thank you. Concerned (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:24 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250624172435.pdf
Make it
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Make it (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Prioritizing Investment Property Over Community NeedsMake it (37920), June 24, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Perhaps most troubling is that the proposed homes are not intended to be affordable housing for local families or first-time buyers. These units are being marketed as investment properties, likely short-term rentals or absentee-owned income-generating assets. This does nothing to alleviate our communitys acute shortage of affordable, owner-occupied housing. In fact, it exacerbates displacement pressures and undermines the stability of our neighborhood.
Tiana
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Tiana (37920), June 24, 2025 at 7:38 PM
A steep-slope development is planned on parcel 123FA003,Âone of the highest, most unstable peaks along Chapman Highway. The narrow access road is already eroding, unsafe for EMS, and unfit for more traffic or housing. The developer began clearing land without permits, cutting old-growth trees, and misleading neighbors about his intentions.Tiana (37920), June 24, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is not affordable housing, its a high-risk project that endangers homes, wildlife, and Knoxvilles greenbelt.
Read the full letter and join us in demanding responsible, transparent planning
Your voice matters. Lets protect our hill
- Tiana Winter
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250624193820.pdf
Lucas
3792
3792
7-SB-25-C
Lucas ( 3792), June 25, 2025 at 7:54 AM
The access road is narrow, eroding, and unfit for additional traffic. EMS access is already limited, and stormwater from Locust Hill drains directly through the proposed site.Lucas ( 3792), June 25, 2025 at 7:54 AM
In response, residents formally request:
A limit of no more than 3 homes, with lot widths consistent with surrounding properties
See pdf continuation.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250625075414.pdf
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), June 25, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Please see attached PDF for full statementNancy (37920), June 25, 2025 at 6:08 PM
I live at 5304 Chapman Highway and would be significantly impacted by the proposal to build a development behind my house. I have lived here since 1979 and bought my house, in part, because of the wooded area. This woods is wildlife corridor, connecting some parts of the urban wilderness to East Red Bud.
This area is a steep hillside between Locust Hill Lane and 3 houses, such as mine, directly on Chapman Hwy. The proposals scope of 9 houses significantly enlarges density on this strip of land. The entire scope seems far greater than what this hillside can sustain.
There are two proposed houses very close to the area behind my house.
I am concerned also about trees being cut and the impact on erosion of the steep hill, which will impact my property.
This area would certainly have been an area that could have been a protected wildlife and wooded area, rather than inserting 9 houses on potentially unstable land. I urge the MPC to reconsider the need to alter this wildlife and wooded area of Knoxville.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250625180849.pdf
Gene
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Gene (37920), June 26, 2025 at 8:35 AM
The attached file is our strong objection to the development plan for Locust Hill Lane.Gene (37920), June 26, 2025 at 8:35 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250626083507.pdf
Responsible dev.
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Responsible dev. (37920), June 26, 2025 at 5:01 PM
In 3 years this hillside has experienced at least 20 fallen very mature trees which shows active erosion and instabilityResponsible dev. (37920), June 26, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Several vehicles have driven off edge resulting in needing pulled off hillside
A firetruck had to back all the way down and turnout in genes driveway
A streetside parked vehicle was struck by another vehicle.
Multiple kub outages from fallen lines
Tracy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Tracy (37920), June 27, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Please see attached about the concerns of this proposed development. Tracy (37920), June 27, 2025 at 1:51 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250627135144.pdf
Candace
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Candace (37920), June 28, 2025 at 10:48 AM
I am worried about the trees being taken down and the road being busy. Some houses would be okay but 9 is too many. Candace (37920), June 28, 2025 at 10:48 AM
Dede
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Dede (37920), June 29, 2025 at 2:01 PM
I write to ask you to please not approve the Subdivision Concept Plan 7-SB-25-C to be located at the corner of Locust and Chapman Highway. I am a Colonial Village resident and have been for nearly 30 years. I travel this particular section of Chapman Highway on a daily basis. I believe this to be one of the most dangerous stretches of highway in the whole City of Knoxville. There have been countless wrecks and even fatalities. This should be considered before allowing a developer to build more homes right in middle of this very dangerous area. Its literally a matter of life and death. Thank you for your kind consideration.Dede (37920), June 29, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Jaylene
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Jaylene (37920), June 30, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Id like to voice my extreme concern over the development on my very steep and narrow street Locust Hill Lane. My elderly mother lives with me and sadly calling for medical help is common. Its very difficult for emergency vehicles to turn around at our dead end. Im concerned with several more vehicles this will only worsen. Id also ask the consideration of the current setback if 25 feet to be increased to 40. There is no room for vehicles and these houses are most likely going to be vacation rentals for UT games bringing guests who have no concern for actual residents. The noise pollution will be horrendous with all the trees set to be cut down. We will need a stoplight to accommodate all the vehicles coming and going for safety. Im asking for a decrease in the houses being built fine to three. This is a horrible thing we are faced with. Thank you on your consideration. Jaylene (37920), June 30, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Alexis
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Alexis (37920), July 1, 2025 at 8:03 PM
The additional houses will cause so much more congestion to our dead end street that is already dangerous turning out into Chapman Highway on Alexis (37920), July 1, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Larry
37909
37909
7-B-25-OA
Larry (37909), July 7, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Please see attached document from Community Forum.Larry (37909), July 7, 2025 at 4:29 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250707162916.pdf
Nicholas
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nicholas (37920), July 8, 2025 at 1:00 AM
I am typing this comment today to formally object to this proposal. While I have only lived here for 9 years, compared to some of my neighbors, I know experienced enough to know that tearing up this hillside to build those houses on that steep of a grade can't be good. Please see my attached document for more details. Nicholas (37920), July 8, 2025 at 1:00 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250708010003.pdf
CharLee
37917
37917
7-B-25-OA
CharLee (37917), July 9, 2025 at 1:27 PM
I fully and wholeheartedly support higher density housing. It is the only way to increase affordable housing stock and efficiently serve the citizens of our county. The housing crisis needed to be dealt with in zoning code decades ago. Townhouses also serve as a wonderful intermediate between single family and multi family housing. Most folks dont want a giant apartment complex. Thats fine. But townhomes and duplexes are not those. They are homeownership opportunities for our residents. It will also lessen affordable housing barriers for developers. Giant apartment complexes get to go up with tax breaks with no opporsition. Smaller developers and affordable housing developers are getting unearned flack for how many apartments are going up. Affordable housing developers are having to jump through hoops to do lower density multi family housing that private developers are not being asked to do.CharLee (37917), July 9, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Save our neighbors from homelessness and cost burdened housing. Support multi family affordable housing.
Leland
37909
37909
7-B-25-OA
Leland (37909), July 10, 2025 at 11:53 AM
On behalf of the West Hills Community Association, we fully support Mr. Silverstein's letter regarding this proposed change to the zoning ordinances. Leland (37909), July 10, 2025 at 11:53 AM
We agree there has been very little time to become aware of the proposed change and creation of a new housing classification and the ramifications it may have on Knoxville's neighborhoods. We understand the City's desire to address housing options and prefer to be partners in the process.
To achieve a mutually agreeable solution to improve housing options, it is essential to include residents in neighborhoods across the city who will be impacted by any change in the zoning ordinance.
I and a handful of my neighbors just learned about this amendment and the other proposed changes this past weekend. Such a short notice does not benefit the process and only fosters deeper skepticism.
Therefore, we respectfully request the Planning Commission postpone any consideration or action until such time that we, the public, have the time to become involved as an informed, respected partner in the process.
Leland Hume
President, West Hills Community Association
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), July 15, 2025 at 7:27 PM
One issue that particularly impacts my property is that 2 houses are shown in the proposal directly behind my house. Because of the contour of the property, that is the most narrow point on the entire land. In addition, the slope directly behind my property is 28%. The distance between the top of Locust Hill to the back of my property line is 178 feet and drops at least 50 feet to the back of my property. The height at the top of Locust behind my house is 1050 feet. So the slope is 50/178=.28 (28%). This calculation was based on KGIS mapping and conducted by a UT geographer and mapping expert for me. It seems that the slope calculations should be done for each of the lots, not for the entire development parcel. In addition, the houses are most compressed in the 2 lots directly behind my house.Nancy (37920), July 15, 2025 at 7:27 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250715192712.pdf
East TN Realtors
37919
37919
7-B-25-OA
East TN Realtors (37919), Submitted during the meeting
Attachment handed out at meeting.East TN Realtors (37919), Submitted during the meeting
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250718083733.pdf
Submitted during the meeting
Coury
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Coury (37920), July 20, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Although it may be expected that residents of an old, quaint neighborhood will object to a new housing development in their midst, this particular plan is especially objectionable. It is so poorly sited that it boggles the mind. There are very good reasons why these particular plots of land have not already been developed in the past hundred years, and those reasons have only accumulated as our understanding of proper land use and careful traffic engineering have advanced.Coury (37920), July 20, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Please open the attached PDF for my thoughts on this proposed development.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250720221312.pdf
Cindy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Cindy (37920), July 29, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Please don't. Please just don't take this property for more development. Cindy (37920), July 29, 2025 at 2:09 PM
I understand my voice and view do not matter that much, but it does hurt my heart for more land to be made into a concrete jungle.
Steven
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Steven (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:05 PM
I am opposed to this devlopment. Hillside development is restricted and the environmental impact to the carst ecosystem is unacceptable. Not to mention the impact on wildlife and the reduction of our urban wilderness.Steven (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Leah
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Leah (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:36 PM
I am deeply concerned about the proposed subdivision. Clearing the land to build houses out of the character of South Knoxvilles charm will disrupt the area in several ways. First of all, South Knoxville DOES NOT have the facilities and infrastructure necessary to support such a project. Second, clearing the land will do irreparable harm to the areas wildlife and habitats. Deer and other animals depend on that wooded area. If the habitat is destroyed, deer and other animals will be forced to cross Chapman in search of food and shelter. Can you imagine the number of accidents this will cause on an already-dangerous road? Lastly, why? Why are we kowtowing to developers. Is Knoxville for sale to the highest bidder? As a Knoxville native, I sure hope not. I love this city. I love my home of South Knoxville and all its people. We need to focus on infrastructure to support a healthy, prosperous lifestyle for the people of South Knoxville, as well as its animals and habitats. The prospect of a new subdivision at the proposed location breaks my heart. Please dont let it break South Knoxville.Leah (37920), July 29, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Brianna
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Brianna (37920), July 29, 2025 at 9:39 PM
We do NOT need a subdivision made anywhere. Building is ruining our wildlife and ecosystem down the drain. And the housing we already have is being bought up by people who try and jack the prices up causing our community to not be able to afford to live anywhere. Please stop destroying our environment. Brianna (37920), July 29, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Kathleen
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Kathleen (37920), July 30, 2025 at 11:29 AM
As a resident of Colonial Village, I strongly oppose this new development at Locust Hill. My concerns are these:Kathleen (37920), July 30, 2025 at 11:29 AM
1. Environmental. Large healthy trees will be removed. The overhead canopy will be gone. Animals who use this property will find backyard In which to probably cause havoc.
2. Traffic at that location, it is on a curve and is already dangerous. Do we really need MORE traffic on Chapman.. particularly at that location?
3. Esthetics. Colonial Village is an established neighborhood with older, more classic styling. One can only imagine the modern cookie cutter homes they will want to place there. We like our diversity and our charm. We do not want square boxes for home with a twig in the from yard indicating that they reforested.
We all know what this will look like. And it is not suited for Colonial village.
VOTE NO ON LOCUST HILL!
Kathleen M.
[redacted]
Homeowner and VOTER
Darla
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Darla (37920), July 30, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Although housing is critical in Knoxville, it is imperative that your committee carefully plan for growth, as I know you are well aware. I oppose the building of units on a large, wooded acreage that fronts on Chapman Highway south of Stone Road between Larry Drive and East Redbud and backs up to the Urban Wilderness. Building will require the removal of many of the trees and destroy the wildlife pathway that is actively utilized by deer, bear and bobcats and affect the Goose Creek and Baker Creek watersheds. Residents in my neighborhood of Colonial Village have expressed concern about the scope of this development, which is on a steep hillside with numerous caves.Darla (37920), July 30, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Autumn
37876
37876
7-SB-25-C
Autumn (37876), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 AM
See the attached PDF File!!Autumn (37876), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 AM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806023016.pdf
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Concerns, recommendations and questions related to Locust Hill project 7-SB-25-CNancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:25 PM
8-6-25 Submitted on behalf of residents on Locust Hill Lane and Chapman Hwy
The homeowners on Locust Hill Lane and Chapman Highway are part of a close community that is concerned about the scope of the subdivision being proposed for the woods between these two streets. Although we are not against development, we do feel this proposal is too large for this community of houses that were built in the 1940s and 1950s. Our primary concerns are attached in the PDF.
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806142539.pdf
Nancy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Nancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Attached is the Chapman Highway Corridor Study 2006 referred to in our summary of concerns document posted. Nancy (37920), August 6, 2025 at 2:30 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250806143007.pdf
Terry
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Terry (37920), August 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
I have attached my comments of concern regarding the impact this subdivision will have on the acreage's cave system, the wildlife migration route, the removal of trees and its impact on the Goose Creek and Baker's Creek watersheds, and the egress and ingress from Locust Hill and Chapman HighwayTerry (37920), August 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
View Attachment
https://agenda.knoxplanning.org/attachments/20250810131654.pdf
Rebecca
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Rebecca (37920), August 11, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Dear Planning Commission,Rebecca (37920), August 11, 2025 at 9:50 PM
As a lifelong South Knoxville resident and a 25-year homeowner on Rebecca Lane,located off East Redbud, directly behind the proposed development,I respectfully urge you not to approve Subdivision 7-SB-25-C at the corner of Locust Hill Lane and Chapman Highway.
This section of Chapman Highway is already notoriously dangerous, with frequent accidents and heavy traffic congestion. There is no dedicated turn lane, making it hazardous for vehicles turning onto or off of Chapman. Adding more housing and traffic to this area would only increase the risk for residents, commuters, and emergency responders.
Additionally, the karst topography and steep hillside make this site ill-suited for development. The risks of erosion, drainage problems, and structural instability are significant, and would likely affect not only the proposed site but surrounding properties as well.
This land also borders the Urban Wilderness, a treasured and ecologically sensitive area. Development here would disrupt local watersheds and destroy crucial wildlife corridors. Deer and other animals, already squeezed by encroaching development, would be pushed into roadways and nearby neighborhoodsÂposing safety risks and harming local biodiversity.
I urge you to consider the long-term impacts on our community, our environment, and public safety. Please help us protect what makes South Knoxville special by rejecting this inappropriate development.
Melissa
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Melissa (37920), August 12, 2025 at 2:25 PM
No one in the Rebecca lane community wants this project to continue. Locust Hill already has traffic issues with Chapman Hwy., we all do. Its a bad idea for environmental reasons as well. Please leave this area alone. Lets give nature a chance to survive.Melissa (37920), August 12, 2025 at 2:25 PM
John
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
John (37920), August 12, 2025 at 3:06 PM
I do not mind the development of this site except for one potential unintendended consequence.John (37920), August 12, 2025 at 3:06 PM
Without the infrastructure of a left turning lane from Chapman Highway this project will lead to someones death. Left turns onto and from Chapman Highway in the stretch from the Stone Road traffic light to the next light at Colonial (I think) are quite risky.
Until whoever is responsible for adding a turn lane does so this project should be a no-go
Respectfully,
John K.
Betsy
37920
37920
7-SB-25-C
Betsy (37920), August 13, 2025 at 7:43 AM
Until traffic problems on Chapman Highway are resolved I dont think it makes sense to build on Locust. I live on East Red Bud, the next street south of Locust. It is difficult and at times dangerous to try to make a left turn off of Chapman. Locust is the same , if not worse. There are liability issues- building on Locust while knowing full well the traffic issues on Chapman is irresponsible. Betsy (37920), August 13, 2025 at 7:43 AM
Janis
37918
37918
9-E-25-DP
Janis (37918), September 5, 2025 at 9:57 PM
The agenda lists this as Commission District 5. I believe it is Commission District 8. If you would, please correct it on the agenda.Janis (37918), September 5, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Betty Jo
37912
37912
9-M-25-RZ
Betty Jo (37912), September 10, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Request a postponement of this case as the applicant has not spoken to the community association on the intent of the rezoning. We agree with staff recommendation to deny RN-5 as that is too intense for that corner lot on the interior of the community. There are already way too many apartments and high density on Inskip Drive.Betty Jo (37912), September 10, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Blake
37938
37938
10-D-25-DP
Blake (37938), September 13, 2025 at 12:02 PM
I strongly disagree with 49 new lots being proposed. We have some of the highest utility prices in Knox County due to age of the system and not being modern. I fear if this proposal goes through it will put even more pressure on utilities and cause our prices to rise. Another reason why I am against this is our roads in the area are not equipped to handle the added traffic that will come with all of the added homes. I am not against growth and opportunity but we need to be smart about our infrastructure and building it up to be able to handle these new developments and growth within Knox county.Blake (37938), September 13, 2025 at 12:02 PM
William
37922
37922
10-U-25-RZ
William (37922), September 15, 2025 at 9:28 AM
I would request that any development along Bluegrass Road incorporate sidewalks along bluegrass Rd. While surronding properties do not have sidewalks. Bluegrass road from Pellissippi Parkway to Ebenezer Road was approved for sidewalks, If the county approves an increased denisty along bluegrass the amount of traffic will increase. It is already dangerous to walk along bluegrass as there is no sidewalk or any shoulder. William (37922), September 15, 2025 at 9:28 AM
DICK
37922
37922
10-P-25-RZ
DICK (37922), September 15, 2025 at 10:25 AM
THE PROPOSED DENSITY AFFORDS A PRODUCT IN KEEPING WITH THE COMMUNITY.... THIS PARCEL WILL BE THE FINAL PARCEL TO COMPLETE THE GETTYSVUE COMMUNITY... MIKE STEVENS HOMES BRING AN EXCELLENT REPUTATION FOR COMPLETING PROJECTS WITH HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS... STRONGLY SUPPORT THE PROJECT AND THE BUILDER...DICK (37922), September 15, 2025 at 10:25 AM
Emma
37920
37920
10-E-25-PA
Emma (37920), September 15, 2025 at 3:49 PM
I would like to voice two main concerns regarding this rezoning request. Emma (37920), September 15, 2025 at 3:49 PM
While I am pleased to hear that this development company is interested in building multi-family housing on this property, which shares a boundary with mine, I would like to firmly state that the alley between the two lots is public property and is frequently used by me personally. Any attempt to include this land in the development or use it as a staging or parking area for construction equipment/crew will not be acceptable.
Additionally, please know that the adjoining neighbors will be closely watching the hillside protection efforts to determine if digging or other construction activities are damaging our properties (fencing, concrete work, building foundations, tree roots, etc.).
If the developer is not confident that the work to build the multi-family unit is feasible without infringing on the neighbors rights and without damage to their property, then I would encourage reassessing the planned construction.
josh
37938
37938
10-D-25-DP
josh (37938), September 15, 2025 at 6:05 PM
I am strictly opposed to any more large developments in this area. The roads and traffic are in horrible shape and cannot handle much more development. Roads and traffic flow and school capacity should be improved before any more large neighborhoods are approved. Cantrell heights across from this property is still nowhere near being completed and will add even more traffic to this road.josh (37938), September 15, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Donald
37919
37919
10-P-25-RZ
Donald (37919), September 16, 2025 at 8:30 AM
It's great that this last, almost blighted piece of Gettysvue is being developed.Donald (37919), September 16, 2025 at 8:30 AM
Jonathan
37923
37923
10-M-25-RZ
Jonathan (37923), September 16, 2025 at 12:51 PM
The density on this proposal is far too high for the area. This would ad potentially 33 homes to an already busy area. Is there any info on what type of residences they will be building? Can we object to the density and propose maybe 3 per acre max? Jonathan (37923), September 16, 2025 at 12:51 PM
Shannon
37931
37931
10-J-25-RZ
Shannon (37931), September 16, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Does the property have an easement just for TVA/ Power or is it public access? Can 2 vehicles pass each other up and down due to elevation? hillside protection area?Shannon (37931), September 16, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Linda
37920
37920
10-H-25-RZ
Linda (37920), September 16, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Please deny the request to rezone this property to higher density. Abner Cruze Road is a narrow road and already has a lot of traffic. If the access to this lot is from Governor John Sevier Highway, a greater traffic hazard will be created for people travelling at a high rate of speed on Governor John Sevier Highway when people stop and turn into this lot, and turn left across oncoming traffic.Linda (37920), September 16, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Abner Cruze Road is primarily single family residential. This lot is too small for the requested density when considering parking.
The character of the neighborhood will be greatly impacted by this rezoning.
Linda
37920
37920
10-H-25-RZ
Linda (37920), September 16, 2025 at 7:28 PM
The applicant states that he engaged surrounding neighbors about this rezoning. We have never been contacted about this rezoning by this applicant.Linda (37920), September 16, 2025 at 7:28 PM
We strongly object to this rezoning as it is inconsistent with the surrounding area. This area is mostly single story homes, and this rezoning will most likely create a taller building with lights glaring into surrounding homes, noise disturbances, traffic congestion, and a general disruption of the character of this neighborhood. The result will be a decrease in surrounding property values.
This rezoning is inconsistent with the surrounding area, and could be considered spot rezoning.
The staff and commission should deny this request.
Patti
37922
37922
10-U-25-RZ
Patti (37922), September 17, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Please dont jam too many homes n his area. The one street neighborhood adjacent to Blue grass Elementary is horrendous. The homes are huge and there is effectively no back yard for kids or pets to play. That makes the play grounds of the elementary school a bathroom for those pets. Not super sanitary. It looks horrible, too.Patti (37922), September 17, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Now they are jamming a high density complex next to the Bluegrass Veterinary.
It negatively affects a persons stress level to see that density.
I drive down blue grass road several times a day. Cant we get a neighborhood there with 2-3 houses an acre? Four houses max? Houses with a real yard?
I guess not. It sure would fit better with the surrounding area that way.
Jeremy
37920
37920
10-O-25-RZ
Jeremy (37920), September 17, 2025 at 8:47 AM
This area is becoming way too saturated. This is literally in my backyard.Jeremy (37920), September 17, 2025 at 8:47 AM
The school infrastructure and roads can not handle all these people. It's ruining what everyone here loves. Strongly disagree with this move.
David
37931
37931
10-R-25-RZ
David (37931), September 17, 2025 at 10:14 PM
I have lived here all my life and the area can not handle anymore traffic there are no shoulder on the road and to many cars and large trucks use it for a cut through to Middlebrook pike because when they were building Schaad rd it pushed traffic this way and now that it open they still use Bakertown there just been to much growth in this area . Thanks David I.David (37931), September 17, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Joshua
37938
37938
10-D-25-DP
Joshua (37938), September 17, 2025 at 11:22 PM
This is honestly a terrible idea. Traffic on our Hill Road is already bad due to Salem Church right across the from the our subdivision, which would butt up against this new development. The area is overly populated, and there is no infrastructure to support this size of growth.Joshua (37938), September 17, 2025 at 11:22 PM
DAVID
37931
37931
10-R-25-RZ
DAVID (37931), September 17, 2025 at 11:37 PM
This area in question for rezoning cannot handle an additional 24 units of any type for development. Attempting to cross the road to collect mail is dangerous already as Bakertown Road continues to be used a a cut-thru for traffic from Ball Camp to Joe Hinton for those trying to go to Middlebrook. Piney Grove, and the numerous other locations that are accessible. The area has already seen growth over the past 2 decades and the road, drainage, and landscape cannot handle any additional changes. The idea that adding up to 4 units per acre to this area, would leave a devastating impact to the rural community feel that is needed in this area. The Schaad road extension project has already greatly affected the area.(Not in a positive way.) While other areas of Knox County continue to be left out of the growth plan, and West/Northwest Knox County continues to be filled with development it is not ready for or needs. The area in question at 2924 Bakertown Rd, if developed would put unwanted and undesired development in the affected area. As a resident of the affected area, specifically on the same road of the land in question for rezoning, I am opposed to the request for rezoning to PR. Please consider denying this request. DAVID (37931), September 17, 2025 at 11:37 PM